Outcome Measure In Clinical Trials Research Articles

The Potential of Metabolomics to Find Proper Biomarkers for Addressing the Neuroprotective Efficacy of Drugs Aimed at Delaying Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s Disease Progression

The first objective is to highlight the lack of tools to measure whether a given intervention affords neuroprotection in patients with Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s diseases. A second aim is to present the primary outcome measures used in clinical trials in cohorts of patients with neurodegenerative diseases. The final aim is to discuss whether metabolomics using body fluids may lead to the discovery of biomarkers of neuroprotection. Information on the primary outcome measures in clinical trials related to Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease registered since 2018 was collected. We analysed the type of measures selected to assess efficacy, not in terms of neuroprotection since, as stated in the aims, there is not yet any marker of neuroprotection. Proteomic approaches using plasma or CSF have been proposed. PET could estimate the extent of lesions, but disease progression does not necessarily correlate with a change in tracer uptake. We propose some alternatives based on considering the metabolome. A new opportunity opens with metabolomics because there have been impressive technological advances that allow the detection, among others, of metabolites related to mitochondrial function and mitochondrial structure in serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid; some of the differentially concentrated metabolites can become reliable biomarkers of neuroprotection.

Development of a measuring app for systemic sclerosis-related digital ulceration (SALVE: Scleroderma App for Lesion VErification).

To test the hypothesis that photographs (in addition to self-reported data) can be collected daily by patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) using a smartphone app designed specifically for digital lesions, and could provide an objective outcome measure for use in clinical trials. An app was developed to collect images and patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) including Pain score and the Hand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis-Digital Ulcers (HDISS-DU) questionnaire. Participants photographed their lesion(s) each day for 30 days and uploaded images to a secure repository. Lesions were analysed both manually and automatically, using a machine learning approach. 25 patients with SSc-related digital lesions consented of whom 19 completed the 30-day study, with evaluable data from 27 lesions. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) baseline Pain score was 5.7 (2.4) and HDISS-DU 2.2 (0.9), indicating high lesion and disease-related morbidity. 506 images were used in the analysis (mean number of used images per lesion 18.7, SD 8.3). Mean (SD) manual and automated lesion areas at day 1 were 11.6 (16.0) and 13.9 (16.7) mm2 respectively. Manual area decreased by 0.08mm2 per day (2.4mm2 over 30 days) and automated area by 0.1mm2 (3.0mm2 over 30 days). Average gradients of manual and automated measurements over 30 days correlated strongly (r = 0.81). Manual measurements were on average 40% lower than automated, with wide limits of agreement. Even patients with significant hand disability were able to use the app. Automated measurement of finger lesions could be valuable as an outcome measure in clinical trials.

Application of Digital Tools and Artificial Intelligence to the Myasthenia Gravis Core Examination.

Advances in video image analysis and artificial intelligence provide the opportunity to transform the approach to patient evaluation through objective digital evaluation. We assessed ability to quantitate Zoom video recordings of a standardized neurological examination the myasthenia gravis core examination (MG-CE), which had been designed for telemedicine evaluations. We used Zoom (Zoom Video Communications) videos of patients with myasthenia gravis undergoing the MG-CE. Computer vision in combination with artificial intelligence methods were used to build algorithms to analyze videos with a focus on eye or body motions. For the assessment of examinations involving vocalization, signal processing methods were developed, including natural language processing. A series of algorithms were built that could automatically compute the metrics of the MG-CE. Fifty-one patients with MG with videos recorded twice on separate days and 15 control subjects were assessed once. We were successful in quantitating lid, eye, and arm positions and as well as well as develop respiratory metrics using breath counts. Cheek puff exercise was found to be of limited value for quantitation. Technical limitations included variations in illumination, bandwidth, and recording being done on the examiner side, not the patient. Several aspects of the MG-CE can be quantitated to produce continuous measures via standard Zoom video recordings. Further development of the technology offer the ability for trained, non-physician, health care providers to perform precise examination of patients with MG outside the clinic, including for clinical trials. Advances in video image analysis and artificial intelligence provide the opportunity to transform the approach to patient evaluation. Here, we asked whether video recordings of the typical telemedicine examination for the patient with myasthenia gravis be used to quantitate examination findings? Despite recordings not made for purpose, we were able to develop and apply computer vision and artificial intelligence to Zoom recorded videos to successfully quantitate eye muscle, facial muscle, and limb fatigue. The analysis also pointed out limitations of human assessments of bulbar and respiratory assessments. The neuromuscular examination can be enhanced by advance technologies, which have the promise to improve clinical trial outcome measures as well as standard care.

Psychometric properties of MG-ADL items and MG-ADL score: An assessment of distributional characteristics, validity and factor structure in two large datasets

BackgroundThe Myasthenia Gravis–Activities of Daily Living scale (MG-ADL) is an 8-item outcome measure to assess symptoms and functional limitations in myasthenia gravis (MG) patients. The MG-ADL score is an equally weighted level sum score that is used as primary outcome measures in clinical trials, in clinical practice, and as an end-point in health economic evaluation. This data analysis aims to obtain detailed knowledge of measurement properties of MG-ADL items and the MG-ADL score. MethodsCross-sectional data from a real-world prospective study (MRW) were combined with longitudinal data from the ADAPT trial. Outcome measures included were MG-ADL, Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis score (QMG), MG 15-item Quality of Life (MG-QOL15r) and EQ-5D-5L. Patients were categorized by their Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) clinical classification. The following measurement properties were assessed: distributional characteristics, inter-item correlation, convergent, known groups and construct validity and internal factor structure. ResultsCorrelations of items within MG-ADL dimensions were moderate, while MG-ADL correlations between comparable MG-QOL15r and QMG items were mixed. Known groups validity for the MG-ADL score was demonstrated for MGFA class. Mean MG-ADL item level scores by MGFA class demonstrated construct validity. PCA, including all four outcome measures, resulted in a nine factor solution. DiscussionPsychometric properties of individual MG-ADL items were moderate to good. This study showed that the MG-ADL adequately captures the multidimensional heterogeneous nature of MG. This is, however, accompanied by mixed psychometric performance of the MG-ADL score, which may complicate health economic modelling.Registration: MyRealWorld-MG was registered on November 25, 2019, with registration numberNCT04176211. The ADAPT randomized clinical trial is registered atClinicalTrials.gov(NCT03669588).

Dysarthria and dysphagia in patients with mitochondrial diseases

BackgroundInformation about dysarthria and dysphagia in mitochondrial diseases (MD) is scarce. However, this knowledge is needed to identify speech and swallowing problems early, to monitor the disease course, and to develop and offer optimal treatment and support. This study therefore aims to examine the prevalence and severity of dysarthria and dysphagia in patients with MD and its relation to clinical phenotype and disease severity. Secondary aim is to determine clinically relevant outcome measures for natural history studies and clinical trials. MethodsThis retrospective cross-sectional medical record study includes adults (age ≥ 18 years) diagnosed with genetically confirmed MD who participated in a multidisciplinary admission within the Radboud center for mitochondrial medicine between January 2015 and April 2023. Dysarthria and dysphagia were examined by administering the Radboud dysarthria assessment, swallowing speed, dysphagia limit, test of mastication and swallowing solids (TOMASS), and 6-min mastication test (6MMT). The disease severity was assessed using the Newcastle mitochondrial disease scale for adults (NMDAS). ResultsThe study included 224 patients with MD with a median age of 42 years of whom 37.5% were male. The pooled prevalence of dysarthria was 33.8% and of dysphagia 35%. Patients with MD showed a negative deviation from the norm on swallowing speed, TOMASS (total time) and the 6MMT. Furthermore, a significant moderate relation was found between the presence of dysarthria and the clinical phenotypes. There was a statistically significant difference in total time on the TOMASS between the clinical phenotypes. Finally, disease severity showed a significant moderate relation with the severity of dysarthria and a significant weak relation with the severity of dysphagia. ConclusionDysarthria and dysphagia occur in about one-third of patients with MD. It is important for treating physicians to pay attention to this subject because of the influence of both disorders on social participation and wellbeing. Referral to a speech and language therapist should therefore be considered, especially in patients with a more severe clinical phenotype. The swallowing speed, TOMASS and 6MMT are the most clinically relevant tests to administer.

Composite outcome measures in high-impact critical care randomised controlled trials: a systematic review

BackgroundThe use of composite outcome measures (COM) in clinical trials is increasing. Whilst their use is associated with benefits, several limitations have been highlighted and there is limited literature exploring their use within critical care. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the use of COM in high-impact critical care trials, and compare study parameters (including sample size, statistical significance, and consistency of effect estimates) in trials using composite versus non-composite outcomes.MethodsA systematic review of 16 high-impact journals was conducted. Randomised controlled trials published between 2012 and 2022 reporting a patient important outcome and involving critical care patients, were included.Results8271 trials were screened, and 194 included. 39.1% of all trials used a COM and this increased over time. Of those using a COM, only 52.6% explicitly described the outcome as composite. The median number of components was 2 (IQR 2–3). Trials using a COM recruited fewer participants (409 (198.8–851.5) vs 584 (300–1566, p = 0.004), and their use was not associated with increased rates of statistical significance (19.7% vs 17.8%, p = 0.380). Predicted effect sizes were overestimated in all but 6 trials. For studies using a COM the effect estimates were consistent across all components in 43.4% of trials. 93% of COM included components that were not patient important.ConclusionsCOM are increasingly used in critical care trials; however effect estimates are frequently inconsistent across COM components confounding outcome interpretations. The use of COM was associated with smaller sample sizes, and no increased likelihood of statistically significant results. Many of the limitations inherent to the use of COM are relevant to critical care research.

American College of Rheumatology and Food and Drug Administration Summit: Summary of the Meeting May 17-18, 2022.

The American College of Rheumatology and the US Food and Drug Administration co-sponsored a public meeting in May 2022 about challenges in the clinical development of drugs for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), focusing on innovative clinical trial designs, outcome measures, and data collection methods. Recommendations include early dose-ranging studies and use of active comparators. Challenges and opportunities in assessing long-term safety by leveraging real-world data from electronic health records (EHRs) and claims data are discussed, along with insights from European registries and the evolving role of real-world evidence and artificial intelligence in regulatory evaluations. Endpoints for assessing disease activity and outcome measures used in RA and PsA trials are explored, emphasizing challenges in defining remission, assessing clinical response, and evaluating structural progression. The need for outcome measures that better reflect treatment targets and the potential of advanced imaging in future trials are highlighted. Challenges with placebo-controlled trials in RA are discussed and use of non-inferiority clinical trial design, in which new drugs are evaluated with active comparators, is proposed. Pragmatic trials in RA and PsA, employing decentralized approaches, are highlighted for their real-world relevance and administrative efficiencies. Strategies for identifying at-risk populations for RA and the challenges of using EHRs and insurance claims data in drug development are discussed. Registry data and digital health technologies show promise in bridging the gap between clinical trials and real-world effectiveness.

Quantitative muscle magnetic resonance imaging in limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type R1 (LGMDR1): A prospective longitudinal cohort study.

Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD) type R1 (LGMDR1) is the most common subtype of LGMD in Europe. Prospective longitudinal data, including clinical assessments and new biomarkers such as quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI), are needed to evaluate the natural course of the disease and therapeutic options. We evaluated eight thigh and seven leg muscles of 13 LGMDR1 patients (seven females, mean age 36.7 years, body mass index 23.9 kg/m2) and 13 healthy age- and gender-matched controls in a prospective longitudinal design over 1 year. Clinical assessment included testing for muscle strength with quick motor function measure (QMFM), gait analysis and patient questionnaires (neuromuscular symptom score, activity limitation [ACTIVLIM]). MRI scans were performed on a 3-T MRI scanner, including a Dixon-based sequence, T2 mapping and diffusion tensor imaging. The qMRI values of fat fraction (FF), water T2 relaxation time (T2), fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, axial diffusivity and radial diffusivity were analysed. Within the clinical outcome measures, significant deterioration between baseline and follow-up was found for ACTIVLIM (p= 0.029), QMFM (p= 0.012). Analysis of qMRI parameters of the patient group revealed differences between time points for both FF and T2 when analysing all muscles (FF: p< 0.001; T2: p= 0.016). The highest increase of fat replacement was found in muscles with an FF of between 10% and 50% at baseline. T2 in muscles with low-fat replacement increased significantly. No significant differences were found for the diffusion metrics. Significant correlations between qMRI metrics and clinical assessments were found at baseline and follow-up, while only T2 changes in thigh muscles correlated with changes in ACTIVLIM over time (ρ = -0.621, p< 0.05). Clinical assessments can show deterioration of the general condition of LGMDR1 patients. qMRI measures can give additional information about underlying pathophysiology. Further research is needed to establish qMRI outcome measures for clinical trials.

The importance of including Long COVID outcomes when developing novel treatments for acute COVID-19.

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic continues to present surges in infections demonstrating the persistent threat posed by COVID-19. Amidst efforts to develop effective treatments for acute COVID-19, there is a growing recognition of the need to address Long COVID. This manuscript reviews the current landscape of acute COVID-19 treatments and highlights the opportunity to incorporate Long COVID as a key outcome measure in clinical trials. Our analysis includes a review of current US clinical trials investigating acute COVID-19 treatments. Of the 19 studies that met our inclusion criteria, only one study currently incorporates Long COVID measurements. In our review, we argue there are 7 compelling reasons to include Long Covid measurements, including: (1) Long COVID is not rare (2) Long COVID is debilitating to individuals and has a high societal cost (3) Those at high risk of severe COVID-19 are also at higher risk of developing Long COVID if they are infected with COVID-19 (4) Treatments for acute COVID-19 may reduce the risk of Long COVID (5) Measures exist to track Long COVID (6) Long COVID considerations are potentially important for acute COVID-19 treatment decision-making (7) Deaths and hospitalizations due to COVID-19 are increasingly rare, creating an opportunity for other important clinical endpoints to be considered In conclusion, while not every trial needs to include assessments of Long COVID, it is worth the research burden to include assessments where possible as this could facilitate the uptake of acute COVID-19 treatments that lessen the societal burden of Long COVID.

Application of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements in Adult Tumor Clinical Trials in China: Cross-Sectional Study.

International health policies and researchers have emphasized the value of evaluating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical studies. However, the characteristics of PROs in adult tumor clinical trials in China remain insufficiently elucidated. This study aims to assess the application and characteristics of PRO instruments as primary or secondary outcomes in adult randomized clinical trials related to tumors in China. This cross-sectional study identified tumor-focused randomized clinical trials conducted in China between January 1, 2010, and June 30, 2022. The ClinicalTrials.gov database and the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry were selected as the databases. Trials were classified into four groups based on the use of PRO instruments: (1) trials listing PRO instruments as primary outcomes, (2) trials listing PRO instruments as secondary outcomes, (3) trials listing PRO instruments as coprimary outcomes, and (4) trials without any mention of PRO instruments. Pertinent data, including study phase, settings, geographic regions, centers, participant demographics (age and sex), funding sources, intervention types, target diseases, and the names of PRO instruments, were extracted from these trials. The target diseases involved in the trials were grouped according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual, 8th Edition. Among the 6445 trials examined, 2390 (37.08%) incorporated PRO instruments as part of their outcomes. Within this subset, 26.82% (641/2390) listed PRO instruments as primary outcomes, 52.72% (1260/2390) as secondary outcomes, and 20.46% (489/2390) as coprimary outcomes. Among the 2,155,306 participants included in these trials, PRO instruments were used to collect data from 613,648 (28.47%) patients as primary or secondary outcomes and from 74,287 (3.45%) patients as coprimary outcomes. The most common conditions explicitly using specified PRO instruments included thorax tumors (217/1280, 16.95%), breast tumors (176/1280, 13.75%), and lower gastrointestinal tract tumors (173/1280, 13.52%). Frequently used PRO instruments included the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire-30, the visual analog scale, the numeric rating scale, the Traditional Chinese Medicine Symptom Scale, and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Over recent years, the incorporation of PROs has demonstrated an upward trajectory in adult randomized clinical trials on tumors in China. Nonetheless, the infrequent measurement of the patient's voice remains noteworthy. Disease-specific PRO instruments should be more effectively incorporated into various tumor disease categories in clinical trials, and there is room for improvement in the inclusion of PRO instruments as clinical trial end points.

Categorization of the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis population via the clinical determinant of post-onset ΔFS for study design and medical practice.

The amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) functional rating scale-revised (ALSFRS-R) has become the most widely utilized measure of disease severity in patients with ALS, with change in ALSFRS-R from baseline being a trusted primary outcome measure in ALS clinical trials. This is despite the scale having several established limitations, and although alternative scales have been proposed, it is unlikely that these will displace ALSFRS-R in the foreseeable future. Here, we discuss the merits of delta FS (ΔFS), the slope or rate of ALSFRS-R decline over time, as a relevant tool for innovative ALS study design, with an as yet untapped potential for optimization of drug effectiveness and patient management. In our view, categorization of the ALS population via the clinical determinant of post-onset ΔFS is an important study design consideration. It serves not only as a critical stratification factor and basis for patient enrichment but also as a tool to explore differences in treatment response across the overall population; thereby, facilitating identification of responder subgroups. Moreover, because post-onset ΔFS is derived from information routinely collected as part of standard patient care and monitoring, it provides a suitable patient selection tool for treating physicians. Overall, post-onset ΔFS is a very attractive enrichment tool that is, can and should be regularly incorporated into ALS trial design.

Outcome Measures of Clinical Trials in Pediatric Chronic Kidney Disease

Outcome Measures of Clinical Trials in Pediatric Chronic Kidney Disease

The Natural History of Retinal Sensitivity Loss in Diabetic Macular Ischemia over One Year Evaluated by Microperimetry.

Background/Objectives: This one-year prospective observational study, conducted at two centers, aimed to report the natural history of retinal sensitivity (RS) loss in diabetic macular ischemia (DMI). Methods: Patients with stable-treated proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) were recruited if there was evidence of DMI on optical coherence tomography angiography, defined as a foveal avascular zone ≥ 0.5 mm2 or parafoveal capillary dropout ≥ 1 quadrant. The minimal visual acuity required for performing microperimetry (MP) was ≥54 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters (Snellen equivalent 20/80). The overall RS (oRS) and pointwise sensitivity (PWS) within the 3 × 3 mm macula were assessed at baseline and twelve months. A value <25 decibels (dB) was defined as impaired RS, and a decrease of 2 and 7 dB was regarded as mild and severe loss, respectively. Results: A total of 88 patients (97 eyes) were included. No statistically significant MP changes were detected at one year. However, 10% of the cohort lost oRS ≥ 2 dB, and 73% lost ≥2 dB PWS in ≥5 loci, whereas 1% lost oRS ≥ 7 dB, and 4% lost ≥7 dB PWS in ≥5 loci. The foveola and temporal parafovea were the most vulnerable to severe RS loss. Compared to their counterpart, eyes with baseline oRS ≥ 25 dB had significantly more RS loss in the macula and superior parafovea (55% versus 32% and 53% versus 28%, both p = 0.01). Conclusions: Rather than oRS loss, ≥2 dB loss in PWS in ≥5 loci is a more feasible outcome measure for clinical trials in DMI.

Detection of structural lesions of the sacroiliac joints in patients with spondyloarthritis: A comparison of T1-weighted 3D spoiled gradient echo MRI and MRI-based synthetic CT versus T1-weighted turbo spin echo MRI.

To investigate the detection of erosion, sclerosis and ankylosis using 1mm 3D T1-weighted spoiled gradient echo (T1w-GRE) MRI and 1mm MRI-based synthetic CT (sCT), compared with conventional 4mm T1w-TSE. Prospective, cross-sectional study. Semi-coronal 4mm T1w-TSE and axial T1w-GRE with 1.6mm slice thickness and 0.8mm spacing between overlapping slices were performed. The T1w-GRE images were processed into sCT images using a commercial deep learning algorithm, BoneMRI. Both were reconstructed into 1mm semi-coronal images. T1w-TSE, T1w-GRE and sCT images were assessed independently by 3 expert and 4 non-expert readers for erosion, sclerosis and ankylosis. Cohen's kappa for inter-reader agreement, exact McNemar test for lesion frequencies and Wilcoxon signed-rank test for confidence in lesion detection were used. Nineteen patients with axial spondyloarthritis were evaluated. T1w-GRE increased inter-reader agreement for detecting erosion (kappa 0.42 vs 0.21 in non-experts), increased detection of erosion (57 vs 43 of 152 joint quadrants) and sclerosis (26 vs 17 of 152 joint quadrants) among experts, and increased reader confidence for scoring erosion and sclerosis. sCT increased inter-reader agreement for detecting sclerosis (kappa 0.69 vs 0.37 in experts) and ankylosis (0.71 vs 0.52 in non-experts), increased detection of sclerosis (34 vs 17 of 152 joint quadrants) and ankylosis (20 vs 13 of 76 joint halves) among experts, and increased reader confidence for scoring erosion, sclerosis and ankylosis. T1w-GRE and sCT increase sensitivity and reader confidence for the detection of erosion, sclerosis and ankylosis, compared with T1w-TSE. These methods improve the detection of sacroiliac joint structural lesions and might be a useful addition to SIJ MRI protocols both in routine clinical care and as structural outcome measures in clinical trials.

Vitamin E (Alpha-tocopherol) Central Nervous System (CNS) Effects [Increasing Ramified Microglia; Decreasing Astrocytosis; Decreasing Oxidative Stress Biomarkers; Slowing Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) Progression from Early to Advanced Disease] and Respiratory System Effects [Decreasing Vital Capacity Loss with Age by Increasing Alpha-tocopherol and Decreasing Gamma-tocopherol; Improving Resistance to Respiratory Bacterial Infections] Require Proper Dose/Dose Exposure Time and Outcome Measures for Future

Vitamin E (Alpha-tocopherol) Central Nervous System (CNS) Effects [Increasing Ramified Microglia; Decreasing Astrocytosis; Decreasing Oxidative Stress Biomarkers; Slowing Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) Progression from Early to Advanced Disease] and Respiratory System Effects [Decreasing Vital Capacity Loss with Age by Increasing Alpha-tocopherol and Decreasing Gamma-tocopherol; Improving Resistance to Respiratory Bacterial Infections] Require Proper Dose/Dose Exposure Time and Outcome Measures for Future

The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System is a valid, reliable, and responsive tool to assess symptom burden in decompensated cirrhosis.

While there is a growing need for interventions addressing symptom burden in patients with decompensated cirrhosis (DC), the lack of validated symptom assessment tools is a critical barrier. We investigated the psychometric properties of the revised Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS-r) in a longitudinal cohort of patients with DC. Adult outpatients with DC were prospectively recruited from a liver transplant center and completed ESAS-r at baseline and week 12. We examined reliability, floor/ceiling effects, structural validity, and known-groups validity. We examined the convergent and predictive validity of ESAS-r with health-related quality of life using the Short Form Liver Disease Quality of Life (SF-LDQOL) and responsiveness to changes in anxiety and depression using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 from baseline to week 12. From August 2018 to September 2022, 218 patients (9% Child-Pugh A, 59% Child-Pugh B, and 32% Child-Pugh C) were prospectively recruited and completed the ESAS-r, SF-LDQOL, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at baseline and week 12 (n = 135). ESAS-r had strong reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.86), structural validity (comparative fit index 0.95), known-groups validity (Child-Pugh A: 25.1 vs. B: 37.5 vs. C: 41.4, p = 0.006), and convergent validity (r = -0.67 with SF-LDQOL). Floor effects were 9% and ceiling effects were 0.5%. Changes in ESAS-r scores from baseline to week 12 significantly predicted changes in SF-LDQOL (β = -0.36, p < 0.001), accounting for 30% of the variation. ESAS-r was strongly responsive to clinically meaningful changes in SF-LDQOL, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. ESAS-r is a reliable, valid, and responsive tool for assessing symptom burden in patients with DC and can predict changes in health-related quality of life. Future directions include its implementation as a key outcome measure in cirrhosis care and clinical trials.

Validation of the Investigator Global Assessment of Chronic Hand Eczema (IGA–CHE): a new clinician reported outcome measure of CHE severity

The Investigator Global Assessment of Chronic Hand Eczema (IGA–CHE) is a novel Clinician-Reported Outcome measure that allows investigators to assess cross-sectional CHE global disease severity using clinical characteristics of erythema, scaling, lichenification/hyperkeratosis, vesiculation, oedema, and fissures as guidelines for overall severity assessment. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the IGA–CHE for use as an outcome measure in CHE clinical trials and clinical practice. Psychometric analyses were performed using data from a sample of 280 patients with moderate to severe CHE from a phase 3 trial of delgocitinib cream, pooled across treatment groups. Test–retest reliability results were moderate to strong with kappa coefficients ranging from 0.63 to 0.76. Correlations with measures assessing related concepts were moderate or strong (range 0.65–0.72) and exceeded a priori hypotheses, providing evidence of convergent validity. Known-groups validity was supported by statistically significant differences between severity groups (< 0.001). Within-group effect sizes were consistently larger for improved groups compared to stable groups, providing evidence of ability to detect change. Anchor-based analyses generated within-subject meaningful change estimates ranging from – 0.8 to – 2.3. A correlation weighted average suggested a single value of – 1.7 in change from baseline. These findings provide evidence the IGA–CHE scale has strong reliability, construct validity, and ability to detect change, supporting its use as an endpoint in CHE clinical trials and clinical practice. Based on the evidence, 2-level changes in IGA–CHE score are considered a conservative meaningful change threshold; however, findings also indicate 1-level change in IGA–CHE scores reflects a clinically meaningful improvement for patients.Clinical trial registration: NCT04871711.

Analysis of caregiver perspectives on patients with mucopolysaccharidosis II treated with pabinafusp alfa: results of qualitative interviews in Japan

BackgroundMucopolysaccharidosis type II (MPS II), or Hunter syndrome, is a rare X-linked metabolic disorder predominantly affecting males. Pabinafusp alfa, an iduronate-2-sulfatase enzyme designed to cross the blood-brain barrier, was approved in Japan in 2021 as the first enzyme replacement therapy targeting both the neuropathic and somatic signs and symptoms of MPS II. This study reports caregivers’ experiences of MPS II patients receiving pabinafusp alfa through qualitative interviews.MethodsSemi-structured, qualitative interviews were conducted with caregivers at seven clinical sites in Japan using a semi-structured moderation guide (Voice of the Caregiver guide). Thematic analysis was applied to the interview transcripts to identify symptoms and health-related quality of life impacts at baseline, changes during treatment, and overall treatment experience.ResultsSeven caregivers from 16 trial sites participated, representing seven children aged 8–18 years who had received pabinafusp alfa for 3.3–3.5 years at the time of the interviews. Data suggest a general trend toward improvement in multiple aspects, although not all caregivers observed discernible changes. Reported cognitive improvements included language skills, concentration, self-control, eye contact, mental clarity, concept understanding, following instructions, and expressing personal needs. Further changes were reported that included musculoskeletal improvements and such somatic changes as motor function, mobility, organ involvement, joint mobility, sleep patterns, and fatigue. Four caregivers reported improvements in family quality of life, five expressed treatment satisfaction, and all seven indicated a strong willingness to continue treatment of their children with pabinafusp alfa.ConclusionCaregivers’ perspectives in this study demonstrate treatment satisfaction and improvement in various aspects of quality of life following therapy with pabinafusp alfa. These findings enhance understanding of pabinafusp alfa’s potential benefits in treating MPS II and contribute to defining MPS II-specific outcome measures for future clinical trials.

Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy European Patient Survey: Assessing Patient Reported Disease Burden and Preferences in Clinical Trial Participation.

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a genetic disorder characterized by progressive muscle weakness leading to permanent disability. There are no curative treatments, however, there are several upcoming clinical trials testing new therapies in FSHD. This study aimed to explore the disease burden and patient preferences of people with FSHD to ensure that clinical trials can be designed to include outcome measures that are relevant and important to patients. A survey was developed with a steering committee clinicians and physiotherapists with relevant experience in the disease, patient representatives, a registry expert and industry consultants. Themes of the survey included; participant demographics, disease progression and impact on function, factors encouraging or discouraging clinical trial participation, and positive outcomes of a clinical trial. 1147 participants responded to the online survey, representing 26 countries across Europe and a range of disease severities. The study highlighted the key symptoms causing concern for FSHD patients - muscle weakness and mobility issues - reflecting what participants want targeted for future therapies. The need for clear information and communication throughout clinical trials was emphasised. Factors most encouraging trial participation included access to new investigational therapies, access to trial results and benefits for the FSHD community. Factors most discouraging trial participation included travel related issues and fear of side effects. The results from this study identify the patient reported burden of FSHD and should provide researchers and industry with areas of therapeutic research that would be meaningful to patients, as well as supporting the development of patient centric outcome measures in clinical trials.

The Multiple Odysseys in Research and Clinical Care for Neurogenetic Conditions.

Neurogenetic conditions (NGC; e.g., fragile X, Angelman, Prader-Willi syndromes) represent the cause for intellectual or developmental disabilities in up to 60% of cases. With expanded diagnostic options and an increasing focus on the development of gene therapies comes the potential of improved quality of life for individuals with NGCs and their families. However, these emerging initiatives also bring new challenges and considerations for NGC researchers and clinicians, including considerations for supporting caregivers and assuring outcome measures for clinical trials adequately reflect the lived experiences of people with NGCs. This paper summarizes the advances and current and future challenges of research and clinical service provision for people with NGCs and their caregivers.