Outcomes Of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Research Articles

Effects of Transradial Access on In-Hospital Outcomes in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: Insights from the Japanese Nationwide Database

Due to its superior safety profile and improved outcomes, trans-radial percutaneous coronary intervention (TRI) has become the preferred access in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of native coronary disease. This study investigated the impact of TRI on in-hospital outcomes after PCI for coronary artery bypass graft vessels (GV-PCI). We analyzed patients who underwent GV-PCI in 2019–2022 from the Japanese nationwide registry. Patients were categorized into the TRI and trans-femoral percutaneous coronary intervention (TFI) groups. We assessed the association of TRI and in-hospital outcomes. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital death and major bleeding. GV-PCI was performed in 2,295 Out of 972,370 total PCI procedures. The primary outcomes occurred in 29 patients (1.3%), including 17 deaths (0.7%). Major bleeding occurred in 12 patients (0.5%), and access site bleeding in seven patients (0.3%). The TRI group (N=1,521) showed lower crude rates of the primary outcome (0.9% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.039), major bleeding (0.3% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.027), and access site bleeding (0.1% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.047) compared to the TFI group (N=774). Univariable logistic regression demonstrated a significant association of TRI with reduced primary outcome (odd ratio (OR):0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI):0.22-0.98), major bleeding (OR:0.25, 95% CI:0.07-0.80), and access site bleeding (OR:0.20, 95% CI:0.03-0.94). In the multivariable analysis, TRI was still significantly associated with a decrease in major bleeding events (OR:0.29, 95% CI:0.07-0.93). In conclusion, the use of TRI was associated with a reduction in bleeding events when referenced to TFI in the context of GV-PCI.

Intravascular Imaging and Angiography Guidance in Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Among Patients With Diabetes

Data are limited regarding the effects of intravascular imaging guidance during complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with diabetes. To compare the clinical outcomes of intravascular imaging-guided vs angiography-guided complex PCI in patients with or without diabetes. This prespecified secondary analysis of a subgroup of patients in RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI (Randomized Controlled Trial of Intravascular Imaging Guidance Versus Angiography-Guidance on Clinical Outcomes After Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention), an investigator-initiated, open-label multicenter trial, analyzed enrolled patients who underwent complex PCI at 20 sites in Korea from May 2018 through May 2021. Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to undergo either the intravascular imaging-guided PCI or angiography-guided PCI. Data analyses were performed from June 2023 to April 2024. Percutaneous coronary intervention was performed either under the guidance of intravascular imaging or angiography alone. The primary end point was target vessel failure (TVF), defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization. Among the 1639 patients included in the analysis (mean [SD] age, 65.6 [10.2] years; 1300 males [79.3%]), 617 (37.6%) had diabetes. The incidence of TVF was significantly higher in patients with diabetes than patients without diabetes (hazard ratio [HR], 1.86; 95% CI, 1.33-2.60; P < .001). Among patients without diabetes, the intravascular imaging-guided PCI group had a significantly lower incidence of TVF compared with the angiography-guided PCI group (4.7% vs 12.2%; HR, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.25-0.67]; P < .001). Conversely, in patients with diabetes, the risk of TVF was not significantly different between the 2 groups (12.9% vs 12.3%; HR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.60-1.57]; P = .90). There was a significant interaction between the use of intravascular imaging and diabetes for the risk of TVF (P for interaction = .02). Among patients with diabetes, only those with good glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c level ≤7.5%) and who achieved stent optimization by intravascular imaging showed a lower risk of future ischemic events (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.12-0.82; P = .02). In this secondary analysis of a subgroup of patients in the RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI trial, intravascular imaging guidance reduced the risk of TVF compared with angiography guidance in patients without diabetes (but not in patients with diabetes) during complex PCI. In patients with diabetes undergoing complex PCI, attention should be paid to stent optimization using intravascular imaging and glycemic control to improve outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03381872.

Racial Disparities in Outcomes of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Secondary to Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a rare cause of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), predominantly affecting women. Because primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is reserved for a select group of patients, vulnerable and minority patients may suffer delays in appropriate management and adverse outcomes. We examined racial differences in the outcomes for SCAD patients undergoing PPCI for STEMI. Records of patients ≥18 years old who underwent PPCI for SCAD-related STEMI between 2016 and 2020 were identified from the National Inpatient Sample database. Clinical, socioeconomic, and hospital characteristics were compared between non-White and White patients. Weighted multivariate analysis assessed the association of race with inpatient mortality, length of stay (LOS), and hospitalization costs. The total weighted estimate of SCAD-STEMI patients undergoing PPCI was 4945, constituting 25% non-White patients. Non-White patients were younger (56 vs. 60.7 years, p<0.001), had a higher prevalence of diabetes, acute renal failure, and obesity, and were more likely to be uninsured and be in the lowest income group. Inpatient mortality (7.7% vs. 8.4%, p=0.74) and hospitalization costs ($34213 vs. $31858, p=0.27) were similar for non-White and White patients, and adjusted analysis did not show any association between patients’ race and inpatient mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.32-1.13; p=0.11) or hospitalization costs (β: 215; 95% CI: -4193 to 4623; p>0.90). Similarly, there was no association between patients’ race and LOS (incident rate ratio: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.00-1.45; p=0.054]. Weighted multivariate analysis showed that age; clinical comorbidities such as diabetes, acute renal failure, valvular dysfunction, and obesity; low-income status; and hospitalization in the Western region were associated with adverse outcomes. In conclusion, our study does not show any differences in inpatient mortality, length of stay, and hospitalization costs between non-White and White patients undergoing PPCI for SCAD-related STEMI.

The Usefulness of Intravascular Ultrasound and Optical Coherence Tomography in Patients Treated with Rotational Atherectomy: An Analysis Based on a Large National Registry.

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) have been shown to improve the clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in selected subsets of patients. The aim was to investigate whether the use of OCT or IVUS during a PCI with rotational atherectomy (RA-PCI) will increase the odds for successful revascularization, defined as thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 3 flow. Data were obtained from the national registry of PCIs (ORPKI) maintained by the Association of Cardiovascular Interventions (AISN) of the Polish Cardiac Society. The dataset includes PCIs spanning from January 2014 to December 2021. A total of 6522 RA-PCIs were analyzed, out of which 708 (10.9%) were guided by IVUS and 86 (1.3%) by OCT. The postprocedural TIMI 3 flow was achieved significantly more often in RA-PCIs guided by intravascular imaging (98.7% vs. 96.6%, p < 0.0001). Multivariable analysis revealed that using IVUS and OCT was independently associated with an increased chance of achieving postprocedural TIMI 3 flow by 67% (odds ratio (OR), 1.67; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.40-1.99; p < 0.0001) and 66% (OR, 1.66; 95% CI: 1.09-2.54; p = 0.02), respectively. Other factors associated with successful revascularization were as follows: previous PCI (OR, 1.72; p < 0.0001) and coronary artery bypass grafting (OR, 1.09; p = 0.002), hypertension (OR, 1.14; p < 0.0001), fractional flow reserve assessment during angiogram (OR, 1.47; p < 0.0001), bifurcation PCI (OR, 3.06; p < 0.0001), and stent implantation (OR, 19.6, p < 0.0001). PCIs with rotational atherectomy guided by intravascular imaging modalities (IVUS or OCT) are associated with a higher procedural success rate compared to angio-guided procedures.

Long-term clinical outcomes of image-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry.

Imaging modalities for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), such as intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT), have increased in the current PCI era. However, their clinical benefits in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have not been fully elucidated. This study investigated the long-term outcomes of image-guided PCI in patients with AMI using data from the Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry. A total of 9,271 patients with AMI, who underwent PCI with second-generation drug-eluting stents between November 2011 and December 2015, were retrospectively examined, and target lesion failure (TLF) at 3 years (defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization) was evaluated. From the registry, 2,134 patients (23.0%) underwent image-guided PCI (IVUS-guided: n = 1,919 [20.6%]; OCT-guided: n = 215 patients [2.3%]). Based on propensity score matching, image-guided PCI was associated with a significant reduction in TLF (hazard ratio: 0.76; 95% confidence interval: 0.59-0.98, p = 0.035). In addition, the TLF incidence in the OCT-guided PCI group was comparable to that in the IVUS-guided PCI group (5.3% vs 4.7%, p = 0.903). Image-guided PCI, including IVUS and OCT, is associated with favorable clinical outcomes in patients with AMI at 3 years post-intervention. Additionally, OCT-guided PCI is not inferior to IVUS-guided PCI in patients with AMI.

Percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes based on American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association coronary lesion classification over 14 years – Melbourne interventional group (MIG) registry

BackgroundThe American College of Cardiology / American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) introduced a coronary lesion classification in 1988 to stratify coronary lesions for probability of procedural success and complications after coronary angioplasty. Our aim is to assess the validity of the ACC/AHA lesion classification in predicting outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a contemporary cohort of patients. MethodsConsecutive PCI procedures performed between 2005 and 2018, were divided into three periods. At each period, the ACC/AHA lesion classification (A, B1, B2, C) was analysed with respect to procedural characteristics, in-hospital and 30-day outcomes, as well as long-term mortality by linkage to the National Death Index (NDI). ResultsIn total, 21,437 lesions were included with 7399 lesions (2005–2009), 6917 lesions (2010–2014) and 7121 lesions (2015–2018). There was a progressive increase in the number of complex lesions treated over time with ACC/AHA type C (15 %, 21 % and 26 %, p < 0.01). The rate of PCI procedural success decreased with increase in the complexity of lesions treated across all three periods (p < 0.01). Further, in-hospital and 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) increased across all three time periods (all p < 0.05). ConclusionsOur study validates the ACC/AHA lesion classification as a meaningful tool for prediction of PCI outcomes. Despite advances in PCI techniques and technology, complex lesion PCI defined by this classification continues to be associated with adverse outcomes.

Temporal Trends in the Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Zotarolimus Eluting Stents Versus Everolimus Eluting Stents: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Long-term follow-up results of various trials comparing Zotarolimus eluting stents (ZES) with Everolimus eluting stents (EES) have been published recently. Additionally, over the last decade, there have been new trials comparing the ZES with various commercially available EES. We aim to conduct an updated meta-analysis in light of new evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to provide comprehensive evidence regarding the temporal trends in the clinical outcomes. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase. RCTs comparing ZES with EES for short (<2 years), intermediate (2-3 years), and long-term follow-ups (3-5 years) were included. Relative risk was used to pool the dichotomous outcomes using the random effects model employing the inverse variance method. All statistical analysis was conducted using Revman 5.4. A total of 18 studies reporting data at different follow-ups for nine trials (n = 14319) were included. At short-term follow-up (<2 years), there were no significant differences between the two types of stents (all-cause death, cardiac death, Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), target vessel myocardial infarction, definite or probable stent thrombosis or safety outcomes (target vessel revascularization, target lesion revascularization, target vessel failure, target lesion failure). At intermediate follow-up (2-3 years), EES was superior to ZES for reducing target lesion revascularization (RR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.05-1.58, p < 0.05). At long-term follow-up (3-5 years), there were no significant differences between the two groups for any of the pooled outcomes (p > 0.05). ZES and EES have similar safety and efficacy at short, intermediate, and long-term follow-ups.

In-hospital outcomes in metabolically healthy and unhealthy individuals over 65 years of age with obesity undergoing percutaneous intervention for acute coronary syndrome: A nationwide propensity-matched analysis (2016–2020)

BackgroundThe obesity paradox in patients with coronary artery disease is well established, but the role of the metabolic syndrome associated with obesity is not well studied. Our study aims to evaluate the in-hospital outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in metabolically healthy individuals with obesity (MHO) and metabolically unhealthy (MUHO) individuals with obesity over 65 years of age with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) between 2016 and 2020. MethodsThis was a retrospective and observational study. Patients were identified through utilizing the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) Database (2016–2020) and ICD-10 codes. By employing a t-test and Pearson's Chi-square test, we assessed and contrasted the initial attributes, concurrent conditions, and results pertaining to all-cause mortality (ACM), cardiogenic shock (CS), length of stay (LOS), and hospitalization expense. Moreover, propensity score matching was conducted in a 1:1 ratio with respect to age, gender, and race. We also utilized multivariable logistic regression to compare MHO and MUHO in terms of the impact on all-cause mortality. ResultsOut of a total of 135,395 patients identified, 2995 patients with MUHO were matched with 2995 MHO patients. Patients in the MUHO group had a higher prevalence of chronic pulmonary disease (24.9 % vs. 19.5 %), peripheral vascular disease (9.3 % vs. 6.7 %), hypothyroidism (16 % vs. 11.5 %), prior myocardial infarction (15.9 % vs. 6.2 %), and prior stroke (7.5 % vs. 2.8 %). Patients in the MHO group had a higher ACM (12.4 % vs. 2.8 %, p < 0.001), CS (18.55 % vs. 7 %, p < 0.001), stroke (2.2 % vs. 1 %, p < 0.001), ventricular assist device insertions (5.2 % vs. 2.7 %, p < 0.001), and IABP insertions (8.8 % vs. 3.8 %) compared to the MUHO cohort. ConclusionOur study revealed an obesity paradox in individuals over 65 years of age undergoing PCI demonstrating worse outcomes, including higher in-hospital mortality, CS, stroke, Ventricular assist device and IABP insertion in MHO patients compared to the MUHO cohort.

Biodegradable Polymer Versus Polymer-Free Ultrathin Sirolimus-Eluting Stents: Analysis of the Stent Arm Registry From the HOST-IDEA Randomized Trial.

The efficacy and safety of each third-generation drug-eluting stent with ultrathin struts and advanced polymer technology remain unclear. We investigated the clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention using the Coroflex ISAR polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) or Orsiro biodegradable polymer SES. The HOST-IDEA trial (Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of Coronary Artery Stenosis-Coronary Intervention With Next-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Platforms and Abbreviated Dual Antiplatelet Therapy), initially designed with a 2×2 factorial approach, sought to randomize patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention based on dual antiplatelet therapy duration (3 versus 12 months) and stent type (Coroflex ISAR versus Orsiro). Despite randomizing 2013 patients for dual antiplatelet therapy duration, the stent arm transitioned to a registry format during the trial. Among these, 328 individuals (16.3%) were randomized for Coroflex ISAR or Orsiro SES, while 1685 (83.7%) underwent percutaneous coronary intervention without stent-type randomization. In this study, the Coroflex ISAR (n=559) and Orsiro groups (n=1449) were matched using a propensity score. The prespecified primary end point was target lesion failure, a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 12 months. The baseline patient and procedural characteristics were well balanced between the Coroflex ISAR and Orsiro groups after propensity score matching (n=559, each group). The Coroflex ISAR group was significantly associated with a higher rate of target lesion failure, mainly driven by clinically driven target lesion revascularization, compared with the Orsiro group (3.4% versus 1.1%; hazard ratio, 3.21 [95% CI, 1.28-8.05]; P=0.01). A higher risk of target lesion failure in the Coroflex ISAR group was consistently observed across various subgroups. The rates of any bleeding (hazard ratio, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.51-1.40]; P=0.52) and major bleeding (hazard ratio, 1.58 [95% CI, 0.61-4.08]; P=0.34) were comparable between the 2 groups. In this propensity score-matched analysis of the stent arm registry from the HOST-IDEA trial, the Orsiro SES was associated with significantly better outcomes in terms of 1-year target lesion failure, mainly driven by clinically driven target lesion revascularization, than the Coroflex ISAR SES. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02601157.

Long-Term Outcomes of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Moderate Lesions in Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndrome

Background: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is crucial to evaluating coronary artery stenosis in patients diagnosed with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). By assessing the severity of stenosis, FFR assists in determining whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is necessary. Methods: Conducted at Tehran Heart Center from 2013 through 2017, this cohort study involved 52,248 CCS patients who underwent coronary angiography. Among them, 598 symptomatic individuals, despite receiving comprehensive medical treatment, underwent FFR assessment. Subsequently, 225 patients with positive FFR (≤0.80) underwent PCI, while 373 patients received solely medical treatment. The patients were monitored for 3 years to evaluate primary and secondary endpoints. Results: After 3 years, the PCI group demonstrated a lower incidence of the primary composite endpoint, consisting of all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, repeat target vessel/lesion revascularization (TVR/TLR), and coronary artery bypass graft surgery, than the medical treatment group (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.98; P=0.012). Additionally, urgent TVR/TLR significantly decreased in the PCI group (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.74; P&lt;0.001). Conclusion: FFR-guided PCI demonstrated effectiveness in reducing long-term major adverse cardiac events, primarily by lowering the incidence of TVR/TLR. The results emphasize the significance of FFR-guided PCI in addressing stenosis rather than alleviating ischemia.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Optimal Medical Therapy for Severe Ischemic Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction

Coronary artery disease is the most common cause of heart failure, which is the leading cause of cardiovascular-related death worldwide. There are insufficient data to make strong recommendations for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with severe ischemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). In that context, we performed a meta-analysis to compare the outcomes of PCI with those of optimal medical therapy alone in patients with severe ischemic LVSD. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to December 2023. Our outcome of interest was all-cause mortality in patients undergoing PCI vs medical therapy. We used random effects models to aggregate data and to calculate pooled incidence and relative risk with 95% CIs. Four studies including 2 randomized controlled trials with 2080 patients (PCI, 1082; optimal medical therapy, 998) were included. All-cause mortality did not differ significantly between the groups: 168 patients (15.5%) in the PCI group vs 200 patients (20.0%) in the optimal medical therapy group (relative risk, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.75-1.09; P=.25). In conclusion, the available evidence indicates that PCI does not improve all-cause mortality in patients with severe LVSD without lifestyle-limiting anginal symptoms. Further data are needed to identify subgroups of patients better served by each modality.

National Trends, Mortality and Outcomes in Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States.

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) have become increasingly utilized in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Despite these purported advantages, prior reports regarding the use of IVUS and OCT have indicated that contemporary use of intravascular imaging remains low with significant regional variation. Here, we present the findings of an updated contemporary analysis regarding the use of IVUS/OCT guided PCI vs. angiography-guided PCI in the United States. We also evaluated in-hospital mortality and clinical outcomes between IVUS/OCT-guided PCI versus angiography-guided PCI-only over million patients in the United States. There has been a significant decrease in the number of PCIs performed, while there has been increasing in trend of IVUS/OCT-guided PCI over this period. Most importantly, we found that IVUS/OCT guided PCI were associated with better clinical outcomes in terms of in-hospital mortality, compare with angiography guided PCI.

PCI Vs. CABG: Battle For Better Outcomes in Pakistani Triple Vessel Disease Patients

Background: Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of mortality worldwide, with Triple Vessel Disease (TVD) representing a severe form that poses significant treatment challenges. In Pakistan, the burden of CVDs is high, exacerbated by genetic and lifestyle factors. Objective: To evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) in patients diagnosed with Triple Vessel Disease (TVD) in a Pakistani cohort. Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted at Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021. A total of 400 patients diagnosed with TVD based on angiographic findings were enrolled. Inclusion criteria included age above 18 years, clinical diagnosis of stable angina or non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, and consent to participate. Exclusion criteria were previous revascularization procedures, concomitant valvular or congenital heart disease, and life expectancy less than a year due to non-cardiac conditions. Patients were assigned to either PCI or CABG based on clinical decisions by their managing cardiologists, considering anatomical considerations, comorbid conditions, and patient preferences. Baseline demographic and clinical data, including age, gender, smoking status, presence of diabetes, hypertension, and previous myocardial infarction (MI), were collected through patient interviews and medical record reviews. Clinical outcomes were monitored for 12 months post-procedure. Primary outcome measures included mortality, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and stroke within 12 months. Secondary outcomes were hospital readmission rates and quality of life scores, measured using a standardized 10-point scale. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 25, with continuous variables expressed as means and standard deviations and categorical variables as percentages. The chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used for categorical outcomes, and the student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous outcomes, with a p-value of less than 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: The mean age of the participants was 62.5 ± 7.8 years, with 62 ± 8 years in the PCI group and 63 ± 7 years in the CABG group (p=0.45). Gender distribution was similar, with 255 males and 145 females overall (p=0.55). Smoking status, diabetes, hypertension, and previous MI were comparably distributed between the groups. Mortality was 5% in the PCI group and 3% in the CABG group (p=0.31). Myocardial infarction occurred in 10% of PCI patients compared to 5% of CABG patients (p=0.05). Repeat revascularization was required in 15% of the PCI group versus 7% of the CABG group (p=0.01). Stroke incidence was 2% in the PCI group and 1% in the CABG group (p=0.45). Hospital readmission rates were 20% for PCI and 15% for CABG (p=0.10). Quality of life scores were higher in the CABG group (8.0 ± 1.1) compared to the PCI group (7.5 ± 1.2) (p=0.04). Conclusion: CABG may offer superior outcomes compared to PCI in managing TVD among Pakistani patients, particularly in reducing myocardial infarction rates and repeat revascularization. Despite the invasive nature of CABG, its long-term benefits suggest it should be considered preferentially for patients with complex coronary anatomies. Clinical decisions should, however, be tailored to individual patient factors and preferences.

Procedural Results and Long-term Outcome of Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in a UK Non-surgical Centre.

Chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has evolved a great deal over recent years, with increased procedural success and lower complication rates being reported. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility, safety and success of a dedicated CTO programme in a large UK PCI centre without on-site cardiothoracic surgery facilities. Clinical and procedural data were retrospectively collected for consecutive unselected patients undergoing CTO PCI between 2015 and 2019 from the local database and regional electronic patient records. In-hospital outcomes and long-term major adverse cardiovascular events (all-cause mortality, MI, stroke and target vessel revascularisation) were recorded. A total of 170 patients underwent 191 CTO procedures during the study period. The mean age was 63 ± 10 years and 80.6% of patients were male (n=137). The clinical indications were: stable chronic coronary syndromes in 88.5% (n=169) of patients; staged procedures in the context of acute coronary syndromes in 1.6% (n=3); and presentation with acute coronary syndrome in 9.9% (n=19). The procedural success rate was 50.0% (n=25) for general interventional cardiologists and 90.1% (n=127) for dedicated CTO operators. In-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events occurred once (0.5%) and interhospital transfer for emergency salvage cardiac surgery was not required. Long-term follow-up data at a median duration of 3.8 years revealed 4 (2.4%) cardiac deaths, 14 (8.3%) spontaneous MI events and 10 (5.9%) target vessel revascularisations. These data suggest CTO PCI using contemporary techniques is both safe and effective when undertaken in a high-volume non-surgical centre by experienced operators.

Influence of time-to-diagnosis on time-to-percutaneous coronary intervention for emergency department ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients: Time-to-electrocardiogram matters.

Earlier electrocardiogram (ECG) acquisition for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is associated with earlier percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and better patient outcomes. However, the exact relationship between timely ECG and timely PCI is unclear. We quantified the influence of door-to-ECG (D2E) time on ECG-to-PCI balloon (E2B) intervention in this three-year retrospective cohort study, including patients from 10 geographically diverse emergency departments (EDs) co-located with a PCI center. The study included 576 STEMI patients excluding those with a screening ECG before ED arrival or non-diagnostic initial ED ECG. We used a linear mixed-effects model to evaluate D2E's influence on E2B with piecewise linear terms for D2E times associated with time intervals designated as ED intake (0-10 min), triage (11-30min), and main ED (>30min). We adjusted for demographic and visit characteristics, past medical history, and included ED location as a random effect. The median E2B interval was longer (76vs 68 min, p<0.001) in patients with D2E>10 min than in those with timely D2E. The proportion of patients identified at the intake, triage, and main ED intervals was 65.8%, 24.9%, and 9.7%, respectively. The D2E and E2B association was statistically significant in the triage phase, where a 1-minute change in D2E was associated with a 1.24-minute change in E2B (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-2.05, p=0.003). Reducing D2E is associated with a shorter E2B. Targeting D2E reduction in patients currently diagnosed during triage (11-30 min) may be the greatest opportunity to improve D2B and could enable 24.9% more ED STEMI patients to achieve timely D2E.

Comparison of Post PCI TIMI Flow Between Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Individuals

Background: Cardiovascular diseases remain the leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally, with diabetes significantly exacerbating the incidence and severity of coronary artery disease. Diabetic patients experience altered coronary blood flow dynamics, which can impact the efficacy of therapeutic interventions like percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Objective: This study aims to compare the post-PCI Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grades between diabetic and non-diabetic patients to assess the impact of diabetes on the short-term outcomes of coronary revascularization. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted at the National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases in Karachi, involving 3,000 patients who underwent primary PCI between January 2018 and December 2020. Patients were categorized into diabetic (1,500) and non-diabetic (1,500) groups. Data collected included demographics, coronary artery risk factors, TIMI flow grades before and after PCI, and the use of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25, employing chi-square tests, t-tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests for comparative analysis, with a p-value of &lt;0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: The study found significant differences in postoperative TIMI3 flow rates, with non-diabetic patients achieving a higher rate of TIMI3 (59.4%) compared to diabetic patients (58.1%). The use of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors was higher in diabetic patients (34.7%) than in non-diabetic patients (1.8%). Additionally, diabetic patients showed a higher incidence of multi-vessel disease and more severe lesion profiles, including higher rates of triple branch lesions (45.9% vs. 39.9%) and left main lesions (53% vs. 43.9%). Conclusion: Diabetic patients exhibit worse post-PCI TIMI flow grades and more complex coronary lesions compared to non-diabetic patients, suggesting that diabetes adversely affects the outcomes of coronary revascularization. These findings underscore the need for tailored therapeutic approaches to improve PCI outcomes in diabetic patients.

The Impact of Radial Vs Femoral Access on Vascular Complications and Patients Outcomes in Complex PCI

Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a primary treatment modality for coronary artery disease, particularly in complex cases involving multivessel disease, chronic total occlusions, or bifurcation lesions. The choice of vascular access site—radial versus femoral—can significantly impact patient outcomes and the incidence of vascular complications. Recent trends favor radial access due to its potential advantages in safety and recovery. Objective: To evaluate the impact of radial versus femoral access on vascular complications and patient outcomes in complex PCI. Methods: This randomized control trial was conducted at the Chaudhary Pervaiz Elahi Institute of Cardiology, Wazirabad, Pakistan, over a six-month period from September 2023 to February 2024. A total of 350 patients undergoing complex PCI were enrolled, with 210 assigned to radial access and 140 to femoral access. Baseline characteristics, including age, BMI, and prevalent comorbidities (dyslipidemia, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus), were recorded. Major outcomes measured included periprocedural myocardial infarction, in-hospital mortality, and stent thrombosis. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Version 26. Results: The mean age of participants was 52.90 ± 8.07 years. No significant differences were found in BMI and comorbid conditions between the groups. In-hospital mortality was 1.4% in the radial group compared to 4.3% in the femoral group (P=0.05). Rates of periprocedural myocardial infarction were similar between groups (0.5% radial vs 0.7% femoral, P=0.77). Stent thrombosis was observed in 0.5% of the radial group and was absent in the femoral group. Conclusion: Radial access in complex PCI was associated with lower in-hospital mortality compared to femoral access, with similar rates of myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis. These findings suggest that radial access may provide a safer alternative, supporting its increasing use in clinical practice.

Myocardial Infarction in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Results from the Nationwide Readmission Database

Introduction: Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a hematological malignancy with an excellent prognostic outcome. After the advancements in CML treatment and the introduction of different tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the life expectancy of CML patients has become equivalent to that of the general population. As a result, coronary artery disease is anticipated to be the leading cause of death among CML patients. Moreover, TKI use is associated with a risk of endothelial dysfunction, thrombosis, and cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction. In this study, we compare the outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with CML to their matched non-CML counterparts. Method: This is a retrospective cohort study using the Nationwide Readmission Database from January 2016 to December 2020. Adults with or without CML hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction and underwent PCI were included. The patients were identified using ICD-10 codes. The primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and 30-day readmission rates. The secondary outcomes were PCI complications rates. Results: Out of 2,727,619 patients with myocardial infarction, 2,124 CML patients were identified. A total of 888 CML patients underwent PCI. CML patients were significantly older (mean age: 68.34 ± 11.14 vs. 64.40 ± 12.61 years, p < 0.001) than non-CML patients without a difference in sex distribution. Hypertension (85.45% vs. 78.64%), diabetes (45.48% vs. 37.29), stroke (11.84% vs. 7.78) at baseline were significantly higher in the CML group. Prior myocardial infarction events (20.51% vs. 15.17%) and prior PCI procedure (24.47% vs. 16.89%) were significantly higher in the CML group. CML patients had a significantly longer hospital stay (4.66 ± 4.40 vs. 3.75 ± 4.62 days, p = 0.001). The primary outcomes did not differ between the comparison groups. The risk of post-PCI complications did not differ between the comparison groups in the propensity matched analysis except for coronary artery dissection (odds ratio [OR]: 0.10; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.02–0.65, p = 0.016) and ischemic stroke (OR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.14–0.93, p = 0.034) which were lower in the CML group. Conclusion: This analysis showed no statistically significant difference in mortality, 30-day readmission, and post PCI complications rates between CML and non-CML patients. However, interestingly, CML patients may experience lower coronary artery dissection and ischemic stroke events than those without CML diagnosis.

C-28 | Percutaneous Coronary Intervention outcomes with IVUS guidance compared to Angiography alone: A systematic review and meta-analysis

C-28 | Percutaneous Coronary Intervention outcomes with IVUS guidance compared to Angiography alone: A systematic review and meta-analysis

D-39 | Comparative Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Patients with Chronic Total Occlusions: The Impact of Active Cancer

D-39 | Comparative Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Patients with Chronic Total Occlusions: The Impact of Active Cancer