As cochlear implant technology continues to evolve, general outcomes improve, but some implant users still suffer from other symptoms of their underlying condition, such as tinnitus and vertigo. Furthermore, the ongoing neural degeneration characteristic of hearing loss may not be fully prevented by electrical stimulation, which implies the possibility of some degree of performance degradation after several decades of implant use. As criteria for implantation expand, ears with progressively more residual hearing are implanted, and often the better-hearing ear is chosen. Minimal trauma electrode designs and surgical approaches have allowed the benefits of combined electric and acoustic stimulation to be demonstrated, which will increase user expectations for protection of residual hearing. Current advances in molecular and inner-ear biology and genetics hint at new possibilities for enhancement of general outcome through application of drugs or biologics. For example, increased understanding of the molecular mechanisms of cell death after ototoxic and acoustic insults allows the investigation of a number of possible therapies to ameliorate the effects of trauma on neural tissue. Those currently under investigation generally belong to the families of neurotrophic factors, antioxidants or anti-apoptotic factors (Raphael, 2002). Additionally, the fields of gene therapy and stem cell transplantation, though still in their infancy, may in time offer long-lasting solutions to some underlying cochlear insufficiencies. Finally, regrowth of peripheral processes of the auditory neurons can be achieved using neurotrophic factors. If certain hurdles can be overcome, this technology might eventually allow closer coupling between implant and nerve, which might have the potential to reduce stimulation currents and increase the number of useful information channels. Each possible therapy identified through basic research requires a delivery solution capable of accurate dosage to the target tissues. Possible delivery mechanisms include systemic, round window (diffusion or injection), depot substances, including coatings applied to a substrate, and delivery in fluid form through a catheter integrated into the implant electrode. Proteins, peptides, liposomes and biologics require parenteral delivery. For many drugs it is anticipated that local delivery will be preferable, to avoid systemic effects and allow accurate dosage, and in some cases this may be necessary due to the blood–perilymph barrier. Round-window delivery does not allow accurate dosage and tends to restrict treatment to the base of the cochlea (Salt and Ma, 2001). Biodegradeable coatings may offer certain advantages (such as ease of use and spatially uniform delivery), but products of breakdown may be toxic, delivery rate is not precisely defined and drug application cannot be terminated without explantation. Prieskorn and Miller (2000) have demonstrated the feasibility of delivery of large proteins in solution to the modiolus through scala tympani application, using an implantable pump. The cochlear implant electrode array is inserted deep into the perilymph of the scala tympani. If used as a conduit, it offers the potential for safe delivery of an accurate and controllable dose of drug to the cochlea. The cochlea is, however, a delicate and highly structured organ offering its own unique risks and challenges. The venture requires extensive multidisciplinary collaboration, and the following are essential criteria for the therapy.
Read full abstract