Otolaryngology Residents Research Articles

The Digital Dilemma: Perspectives From Otolaryngology Residency Applicants on Social Media.

To evaluate the impact of otolaryngology programs' social media on residency candidates in the 2020 to 2021 application cycle. An anonymous survey was distributed via Otomatch, Headmirror, and word of mouth to otolaryngology residency applicants in the 2021 Match. Survey items included demographics, social media usage, and impact of programs' social media on applicant perception and ranking. Descriptive statistics were performed, and responses based on demographic variables were compared using Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney U tests. Of 64 included respondents, nearly all (61/64, 95%) used Facebook, Instagram, and/or Twitter for personal and/or professional purposes. Applicants (59/64, 92%) most commonly researched otolaryngology residency programs on Instagram (55/59, 93%) and Twitter (36/59, 61%), with younger (P = .023) and female (P = .043) applicants being more likely to engage with programs on Instagram. Program accounts were most helpful in showcasing program culture (50/59, 85%) and highlighting its location (34/59, 58%). Nearly one third (19/59, 32%) reported that social media impacted their rank list. Age, gender, reapplication, home program status, or time taken off before and/or during medical school did not significantly influence social media's usefulness in the application cycle. Social media platforms like Instagram and Twitter are frequently used by applicants to assess otolaryngology residency programs. Programs' social media accounts effectively demonstrate program culture and affect applicants' rank lists. As social media usage continues to rise in the medical community, these findings can help otolaryngology residency programs craft a beneficial online presence that aids in recruitment, networking, and education.

Multi-institutional Study of Otolaryngology Resident Intraoperative Experiences for Key Indicator Procedures.

There is concern that current otolaryngology residents may not receive adequate surgical training. We aimed to characterize residents' surgical experiences at 5 academic centers performing the 14 key indicator procedures (KIPs) outlined by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Prospective study. Five otolaryngology training programs. Data were gathered from December 2019 to December 2020 with a smartphone application from the Society for Improving Medical Professional Learning. After each operation, residents and faculty rated trainee autonomy on a 4-level Zwisch scale and performance on a 5-level modified Dreyfus scale. Residents and attendings (n = 92 and 78, respectively) logged 2984 evaluations. Attending ratings of resident autonomy and performance increased with training level (P < .001). Resident self-assessments of autonomy and performance were lower than paired attending assessments (P < .001). Among attending evaluations of KIPs performed by senior residents (postgraduate year 4 or 5), 55% of cases were performed with meaningful autonomy (passive help or supervision only). Similarly, attendings rated 55% of these cases as a practice-ready or exceptional performance. Senior residents had meaningful autonomy for ≥50% of cases for most KIPs, with the exception of flaps and grafts (40%), pediatric/adult airway (39%), and stapedectomy/ossiculoplasty (33%). Similarly, senior residents received practice-ready or exceptional performance ratings for ≥50% of cases across all KIPs other than pediatric/adult airway (42%) and stapedectomy/ossiculoplasty (33%). In this multicenter study, resident surgical autonomy and performance varied across otolaryngology KIPs. The development of nationwide benchmarks will help programs and residents set educational goals. 2.

The Otolaryngology Residency Program Preference Signaling Experience.

ProblemIn the 2021 residency application cycle, the average otolaryngology applicant applied to more than half of programs. Increasing application numbers make it difficult for applicants to stand out to programs of interest and for programs to identify applicants with sincere interest.ApproachAs part of the 2021 Match, otolaryngology applicants could participate in a preference signaling process, signaling up to 5 programs of particular interest at the time of application submission. Programs received a list of applicants who submitted signals to consider during interview offer deliberations. Applicants and program directors completed surveys to evaluate the signaling process and assess the impact of signals on interview offers.OutcomesAll otolaryngology residency programs participated in the signaling process. In total, 611 students submitted applications for otolaryngology residency programs, 559 applicants submitted a Match list including an otolaryngology program, and 558 applicants participated in the signaling process. The survey response rate was 42% for applicants (n = 233) and 52% for program directors (n = 62). The rate of receiving an interview offer was significantly higher from signaled programs (58%) than from both nonsignaled programs (14%; P < .001) and the comparative nonsignal program (23%; P < .001) (i.e., the program an applicant would have signaled given a sixth signal). This impact was consistent across the spectrum of applicant competitiveness. Applicants (178, 77%) and program directors (53, 91%) strongly favored continuing the program.Next StepsMany specialties face high residency application numbers. Programs have difficulty identifying applicants with sincere interest, and applicants face limited opportunities to identify programs of particular interest. Applicants to these specialties may benefit from a preference signaling process like that in otolaryngology. Additional evaluation is needed to determine the impact of signals across racial and demographic lines and to validate these early outcomes.

Editorial introductions.

Editorial introductions.

Flexible Bronchoscopy Simulation as a Tool to Improve Surgical Skills in Otolaryngology Residency.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the benefits of simulation to teach flexible bronchoscopy.Study DesignA prospective cohort study to assess the bronchoscopic skills of residents in an otolaryngology training program using a commercially available bronchoscopy simulator.SettingTertiary care otolaryngology residency program.MethodsThirty-two otolaryngology residents and 4 expert faculty across 2 academic institutions were assessed on 3 flexible bronchoscopy tasks: diagnostic bronchoscopy, foreign body removal, and tracheal lesion biopsy. Performance was evaluated with a modified version of the validated Bronchoscopy Skills and Tasks Assessment Tool. At 1 of the 2 academic institutions, an additional tool was implemented to evaluate the simulator.ResultsThere was a correlation between postgraduate training year and time taken to complete tasks, including bronchoscopy, foreign body extraction, and passing through the glottis (P < .001, P = .04, and P < .01, respectively). There was a significant difference between residents and faculty laryngologists for a range of skills and tasks, including percentage of time in middle lumen, contact with bronchial walls, inadvertent esophagus entry, and biopsy of healthy tissue (P < .001, P = .003, P < .001, and P < .001). Additionally, increasing postgraduate level was correlated with a higher percentage of time in the center of the lumen and reduced time to task completion (P = .05 and P < .001). Of 32 residents, 20 evaluated the simulator on its realism, with an average score of 4.1 of 5.ConclusionThe commercially available flexible bronchoscopy simulator provides a valid assessment of bronchoscopic skill and is a useful tool for practicing bronchoscopy in a safe, controlled environment.Level of EvidenceIndividual cohort study.

Opportunity for Improved Transparency on Otolaryngology Residency Websites for Prospective Applicants.

ObjectiveOtolaryngology residency applicants often struggle to gauge their competitiveness at programs due to the lack of information available, resulting in a rising number of applications. We aimed to evaluate otolaryngology websites for information pertaining to prospective applicants.Study DesignSystematic content analysis.SettingWeb.MethodsWe reviewed 50 otolaryngology websites from June to July 2021. We searched for information pertaining to the application process, including requirements, screening and/or selection processes, and average interviewee or matched resident statistics.ResultsAll websites had a page for prospective applicants. Under half (n = 24, 48%) explicitly listed required application components. Only 23 (46%) mentioned the desired number of letters of recommendation, and only 2 (4%) noted the need for a letter from the department chair. The majority (n = 35, 70%) provided no information regarding the number of applications received or interviews granted. Most (n = 35, 70%) did not mention how candidates are evaluated. A minority (n = 14, 30%) provided very general metrics on which candidates are scored or ranked. Almost all (n = 49, 98%) did not mention screening processes in place to select applicants for interview. None provided information about the academic characteristics or demographics of their interviewed applicants, and only 1 (2%) included this information for matched applicants.ConclusionOtolaryngology websites contain limited information pertaining to the residency application process for prospective applicants, making it difficult for candidates to discern their competitiveness at programs and potentially contributing to match inefficiency.

The Advantages of a Rural Resident Rotation in Otolaryngology Training: Comparing Surgical Case Volumes of a Rural Rotation with a University Rotation

Objective: Rural residency rotations have played a significant role in encouraging surgical residents to pursue a career in a rural community. This study reviews the resident caseload of an otolaryngology residency rural rotation in comparison with a traditional primary university-based urban location. Methods: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) case log system was used to review cases logged by residents during their rural rotations from July 2017 to December 2018. Case log data were compared with a matched resident of similar training experience on the university service during the same time period. Results: Rural residents reported more cases than their urban-based counterparts (1143 vs 690 cases). Junior residents had over double the number of cases in rural practice (400) compared to junior residents on the university service (168). The university service was much stronger on H&N Neck (54 vs. 28 cases), Larynx (39 vs 8) and Endoscopy (92 vs 42). In contrast, the rural rotation provided substantially more Endocrine cases (103 vs 47) and comparable Salivary cases (23 vs 21) compared to the university service. Discussion: This study defines a surgically robust rotation in rural medicine and highlights the possibility of obtaining exposure to a surgical practice unique to a rural setting. By participating in high volume surgical rural residency rotations, trainees may better understand the otolaryngologic needs of a rural

Effect of 3D‐Printed Models on Cadaveric Dissection in Temporal Bone Training

ObjectiveMastoidectomy is a cornerstone in the surgical management of middle and inner ear diseases. Unfortunately, training is challenged by insufficient access to human cadavers. Three-dimensional (3D) printing of temporal bones could alleviate this problem, but evidence on their educational effectiveness is lacking. It is largely unknown whether training on 3D-printed temporal bones improves mastoidectomy performance, including on cadavers, and how this training compares with virtual reality (VR) simulation. To address this knowledge gap, this study investigated whether training on 3D-printed temporal bones improves cadaveric dissection performance, and it compared this training with the already-established VR simulation.Study DesignProspective cohort study of an educational intervention.SettingTertiary university hospital, cadaver dissection laboratory, and simulation center in Copenhagen, Denmark.MethodsEighteen otorhinolaryngology residents (intervention) attending the national temporal bone dissection course received 3 hours of mastoidectomy training on 3D-printed temporal bones. Posttraining cadaver mastoidectomy performances were rated by 3 experts using a validated assessment tool and compared with those of 66 previous course participants (control) who had received time-equivalent VR training prior to dissection.ResultsThe intervention cohort outperformed the controls during cadaver dissection by 29% (P < .001); their performances were largely similar across training modalities but remained at a modest level (~50% of the maximum score).ConclusionMastoidectomy skills improved from training on 3D-printed temporal bone and seemingly more so than on time-equivalent VR simulation. Importantly, these skills transferred to cadaveric dissection. Training on 3D-printed temporal bones can effectively supplement cadaver training when learning mastoidectomy.

Downward Trend in Resident Myringotomy and Tympanostomy Tube Experience.

Historically, myringotomy, and the insertion of tympanostomy tubes has served as one of the initial surgical training experiences for residents. Resident experience with this procedure since the introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines has not been well described in the literature. The objective of this study was to identify trends in resident training experience with chronic otitis media-related surgeries, such as myringotomy and tympanostomy tube placement. While multiple factors influence resident experience, we hypothesize that resident experience has decreased since the introduction of the pneumococcal 13-valent conjugate vaccine (PCV13). In a retrospective review of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) National Data Reports, mean number of myringotomy and tympanostomy tube cases logged in the Resident Case Log System from 2006 to 2019 were collated and plotted against years to identify monotonic trends. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare pre-PCV13 era and post-PCV13 era data. Since the introduction of PCV13, there is a national decreasing trend in the myringotomy and tympanostomy tube placement by otolaryngology residents (P = .001). Otologic surgeries are an important part of resident education and historically have served as one of the initial surgical training experiences for residents. There has been a significant reduction in the number of myringotomy and tympanostomy procedures performed by otolaryngology residents in the past decade. While multiple factors influence resident experience, it is possible that introduction of PCV13 has impacted resident exposure to myringotomy and tympanostomy tube placement. Resident proficiency with this procedure has likely not been affected by introduction of PCV13. Data should be reassessed in 5 years to determine if an impact of the PCV13 vaccine on resident training is evident.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the 2021 Otolaryngology Residency Match: Analysis of the Texas STAR Database.

Objectives/HypothesisTo estimate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic on the 2021 otolaryngology match with regard to geographic clustering, interview distribution, applicant‐reported costs, and matched applicant characteristics.Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.MethodsSurvey data from applicants to otolaryngology residency programs were obtained from the Texas Seeking Transparency in Applications to Residency database. Applicant differences between the 2021 match year and prior match years (2018, 2019, and 2020) were analyzed using two‐sided t‐tests, Chi‐square tests, and Fisher's exact tests.ResultsA total of 442 otolaryngology residency applicants responded to the survey, including 329 from the match years 2018 to 2020 and 113 from match year 2021. In 2021, 30.7% of responding applicants reported matching at a program where they had a geographic connection, compared to 40.0% in prior years (P = .139). Matched applicants in 2021 reported attending less interviews than applicants in prior years (mean 12.2 vs. 13.3, P = .040), and 26.1% of responding applicants reported matching at a program where they sent a preference signal. Applicants in the 2021 match reported significantly lower total costs than applicants in prior years (mean difference −$5,496, 95% confidence interval −$6,234 to −$4,759; P < .001). Compared to prior match years, matched applicants in 2021 had no meaningful differences in characteristics such as United States Medical Licensing Exam board scores, clerkship grades, honors society memberships, research output, volunteer experiences, or leadership experiences.ConclusionBased on this sample, there was no evidence of significant interview hoarding or increased geographic clustering in the 2021 otolaryngology match, and the COVID‐19 pandemic did not appear to result in significantly different matched applicant characteristics.Level of Evidence4 Laryngoscope, 132:1177–1183, 2022

Price Transparency and Compliance With Federal Regulation for Pediatric Tonsillectomy.

To improve hospital price transparency, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) requires, as of January 2021, that all hospitals reveal charges for specific items and services. This analysis investigates whether otolaryngology residency-affiliated hospitals have complied with this new regulation, and it evaluates the variability in hospital-reported charges for pediatric tonsillectomy. Cross-sectional analysis. Subset of hospitals affiliated with otolaryngology residency programs. Hospital websites were searched to determine compliance rates with CMS guidelines by posting a price transparency tool and specific charges for Current Procedural Terminology code 42820 (tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy, <12 years old). Various charges were collected: gross charge, discounted cash price, deidentified minimum and maximum negotiated charges, hospital fees, and physician fees. Overall 104 unique hospitals were analyzed: 81 (78%) provided pricing data, but only 28 (27%) complied with CMS guidelines. The median reported total gross charge was $13,239 (range, $600-$41,957); deidentified minimum negotiated charge, $9222 (range, $337-$25,164); and deidentified maximum negotiated charge, $17,355 (range, $1002-$54,987). Hospital fees (median, $11,900; range, $2304-$38,831) were consistently higher than physician fees (median, $1827; range, $420-$5063). All estimates included a disclaimer stating that values likely underrepresent true prices. Hospital compliance with the new regulation remains low, which limits efforts toward improved price transparency. There is wide variability in reported charges for pediatric tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy.

Evaluation of Neurotoxin and Filler Injection Training in Otolaryngology Residency

Introduction: Residency training courses are fundamental to an Otolaryngology (ENT) residency curriculum. Neurotoxin and filler injections have become common during ENT residency, and the outcomes of training courses have not been previously evaluated. We hypothesize that after participating in the course, resident knowledge, skill, and likelihood of using neurotoxin and filler injections in future practice will significantly improve. Materials and Methods: A prospective study was designed among ENT residents undergoing neurotoxin and filler injection educational training courses from April 2019 to November 2020. After the completion of the course and injections, residents completed a self-evaluation to assess their level of knowledge and skill level with neurotoxin and filler injections. Results: The mean number of neurotoxin and filler injections besides within the course was 1.67 and 0.33, whereas during the course was 3.39 ( P = .008) and 1.39 ( P = .0009), respectively. Resident knowledge, skill, and likelihood of using neurotoxin and filler injections in future practice all significantly improved ( P &lt; .05). This study found that a biannual training course for neurotoxin and injectable fillers was an effective strategy at improving resident knowledge, skill, and likelihood of use in future practice.

Otolaryngology residency selection: are we doing it right?

This article will provide an overview of recent disruptions to the otolaryngology residency match process and conclude with questions and resources that can guide future selection system design. During the implementation of the single accreditation system, the loss of osteopathic programs, reduction of osteopathic leadership positions, and lack of interest in Osteopathic Recognition represent serious threats to the profession; this has implications for the distribution of the otolaryngology workforce, plausibly decreasing healthcare access in less-populated communities. Next, the impacts of COVID-19 reverberated throughout the application process, including the reduction/elimination of away rotations, modification of application requirements, conversion to virtual interviews, and initiation of preference signaling. Soon, the transition to pass/fail scoring for the United States Medical Licensing Exam Step 1 could stimulate a paradigm shift, with a heightened emphasis on holistic review. The last two match cycles have been the most dynamic and unpredictable in decades. Out of the commotion, the otolaryngology community has an opportunity for a fresh start, combining insights from past literature with recent articles compiled for this review. Moving forward, it will be advantageous to approach residency selection as a well-executed quality improvement project, requiring continuous assessment and adjustment.

How Does Geographic Region Affect the Total and Individual Costs for Medical Students Applying to the Competitive Surgical Residencies?

Studies have individually assessed the expenses for medical students desiring a surgical residency in neurosurgery, orthopaedic surgery, otolaryngology, plastic surgery, and urology. A detailed comparison of expenses by geographic region have not been reported. The aim was to geographically compare the expenses of United States medical students applying to the 5 most competitive surgical residencies. Anonymous nationwide survey of plastic surgery, orthopaedic surgery, otolaryngology, urology, and neurological surgery residency applicants. A cross sectional, retrospective analysis of the 2019-2020 Texas STAR Dashboard database, an online tool generated from a nationwide survey of students. Individual (application, away rotation, interview) and total costs for medical school seniors were recorded in addition to applicant characteristics. Mean and median costs were reported for each specialty with percentile distributions and geographic comparisons. A Kruskal-Wallis H test was performed to compare differences in costs between surgical specialties and medical school region. In total, 1136 applicants to surgical residency were included. The number of applicants to orthopaedic surgery (OS) (n = 459), neurological surgery (NS) (n = 121), urology (UR) (n = 191), plastic surgery (PS) (n = 117), and otolaryngology (OTO) (n = 248) were reported. Mean total costs were (OS; $8,205), (NS; $11,882), (UR; $8,207), (PS; $10,845), and (OTO; $7,516) (p ≤ 0.029). Application fees were only significantly different in the northeast and southern applicants between the different specialties, notably orthopaedic surgery applicants spent the most. In all geographic regions excluding the west, neurosurgery and plastic surgery applicants spent significantly more than other specialties for interview costs and away rotation costs. In all geographic regions neurosurgery and plastic surgery applicants spent significantly more than other specialties in total costs. Orthopaedic surgery applicants spend the most on application fees in select geographic regions. Neurosurgery and plastic surgery applicants spend more on interviews, away rotations, and total costs in nearly all geographic regions.

Development of a Cadaveric Multiport Model of Posterior Circulation Aneurysm Clipping for Neurosurgery and Otolaryngology Residents.

Posterior circulation aneurysms are difficult to treat with the current methods of coiling and clipping. To address limitations in training, we developed a cadaveric model to train learners on endoscopic clipping of posterior circulation aneurysms. An endoscopic transclival approach (ETA) and a transorbital precaruncular approach (TOPA) to successfully access and clip aneurysms of the posterior circulation are described. The model has flexibility in that a colored silicone compound can be injected into the cadaveric vessels for the purpose of training learners on vascular anatomy. The other option is that the model could be connected to a vascular perfusion pump allowing real-time appreciation of a pulsatile or ruptured aneurysm. This cadaveric model is the first of its kind for training of endoscopic clipping of posterior circulation aneurysms. Learners will develop proficiency in endoscopic skills, appropriate dissection, and appreciation for relative anatomy while developing an algorithm that can be employed in a real operative arena. Going forward, various clinical scenarios can be developed to enhance the realism, allow learners from different specialties to work together, and emphasize the importance of teamwork and effective communication.

Establishing a Multidisciplinary Cavernous Carotid Injury Simulation to Train Neurosurgical, Otolaryngology, and Anesthesia Residents.

Carotid artery injuries are serious complications of endoscopic endonasal surgery. As these occur rarely, simulation training offers an avenue for technique and algorithm development in resident learners. This study develops a realistic cadaveric model for the training of crisis resource management in the setting of cavernous carotid artery injury. An expanded endonasal approach and right cavernous carotid injury is performed on a cadaveric head. The cadaver's right common carotid artery is cannulated and connected to a perfusion pump delivering pressurized simulated blood. A simulation mannequin is incorporated into the model to allow for vital sign feedback. Surgical and anesthesia resident learners are tasked with obtaining vascular control with a muscle patch technique and medical management over the course of 3 clinical scenarios with increasing complexity. Crisis management instructions for an endoscopic endonasal approach to the cavernous carotid artery and blood pressure control were provided to the learners prior to beginning the simulation. An independent reviewer evaluated the learners on communication skills, crisis management algorithms, and implementation of appropriate skill sets. After each scenario, residents were debriefed on how to improve technique based on evaluation scores in areas of situational awareness, decision-making, communications and teamwork, and leadership. After the simulation, learners provided feedback on the simulation and this data was used to improve future simulations. The benefit of this cadaveric model is ease of set-up, cost-effectiveness, and reproducibility.

Operative Airway Exposure in an Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Training Program. A Survey of Current Trainees.

To survey Otolaryngology residents to evaluate their operative airway exposure during their training and to assess if the exposure was adequate to decide whether to pursue fellowship in pediatric. A modified and validated survey was distributed among otolaryngology trainees in the Western region of Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. It assesses operative airway exposure during training, adequacy of experience to decide on whether to pursue fellowship in pediatric otolaryngology, and plan to perform the following six procedures (diagnostic rigid bronchoscopy, diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy, endoscopic airway foreign body removal, rigid esophagoscopy with or without foreign body removal, suspension microlaryngoscopy procedures, open tracheostomy) in practice. Only 24/60 (60%) of respondents perceived that they had adequate training as to whether or not to make them decide to pursue fellowship in pediatric. In regard to over all assessment of the level of exposure: the vast majority of trainees regarded the training as adequate 30/60 (50%), 3/60 (5%) thought it was excellent, 6/60 (10%) thought it was good, and 21/60 (35%)assessed the training adequacy as poor. 24/33 (72.7%) perceived that the presence of a pediatric fellow with them enhanced their training. In regards to performing surgeries after training, 78% were planning to perform rigid bronchoscopy, flexible bronchoscopy (58%), endoscopic airway FB removal (92%), esophagoscopy (54%), suspension microlaryngoscopy (82%), and open tracheostomy (100%). The presence of a pediatric fellow in service was thought of by most residents as being beneficial, however, the exposure to airway surgeries were not adequate as to inform trainees if they want to pursue fellowship in pediatric, when they were not exposed to a fellow.

Prevalence, Bias, and Rank List Impact of Illegal Questions in Surgical Specialty Residency Interviews

The purpose of this study is to characterize illegal questions as defined by federal law and to assess their impact on applicants' rank lists across four surgical specialties. A survey was developed and sent to surgical specialty residency applicants. The survey asked demographics, the frequency of questions about age, gender, religion, sexual orientation, family status and impact on final rank list. Applicants were asked to respond anonymously based on their experience at all institutions at which they interviewed during the interview cycle. Results were compared by applicant specialty and gender. A large university-affiliated academic medical center PARTICIPANTS: Survey was administered to 3854 applicants (comprising between 28.9% and 41.2% of applicants nationwide) to general surgery, orthopaedic surgery, urology, and otolaryngology residency programs at a single institution during the 2018 and 2019 cycles. A total of 1066 applicants completed the survey. A total of 789 (74.0%) of applicants reported being asked at least one illegal question during the interview process at any institution. Applicants to orthopaedic surgery programs were most likely to be asked illegal question (n = 315, 81.6%), and general surgery applicants were least likely to be asked illegal questions (n = 324, 66.8%, p < 0.001). Females were more likely than males to be asked about gender (n = 99, 26.3% vs. n = 18, 2.6%, p < 0.001) and plans for pregnancy (n = 78, 20.8% vs. n = 78, 11.4%, p < 0.001). 152 (19.4%). Applicants reported that being asked an illegal question lowered a program on their rank list. Female applicants were more likely to lower a program on their rank list as a result of an illegal question (n = 102, 35.4% vs. n = 50, 10.1%, p < 0.001). Illegal questions in surgical specialty residency interviews are common, vary by specialty and applicant gender, and lower programs on applicants' rank lists. This data should serve to inform larger and more inclusive studies in the future. Programs should focus on educating interviewers on illegal topics in an effort to minimize illegal topics that may alienate applicants and contribute to workplace discrimination.

Going Global: Interest in Global Health Among US Otolaryngology Residents.

Background:To meet the rising interest in surgical global health, some surgical residency programs offer global health experiences. The level of interest in these programs, however, and their role in residency recruitment and career planning has not been systematically evaluated.Objective:(1) Define interest in global health among Otolaryngology residents in the USA. (2) Assess engagement of Otolaryngology residencies in global health training. (3) Determine barriers to global health training in residency.Methods:A survey questionnaire was developed and sent to all Otolaryngology Residency Program Directors for distribution to all current Otolaryngology residents in the US.Results:A total of 91 complete surveys were collected. A majority of respondents felt that global health was either “very important” or “extremely important” (67%). Two-thirds of respondents had prior global health experience (68%). While 56% of respondents would definitely participate in a global health elective and 78% would likely or definitely participate, only 37% of residency programs offered a global health experience. The availability of a global health elective significantly correlated with residency match choice in respondents with previous global health experience. The three most common barriers to participation were insufficient time, insufficient funding, and lack of program.Conclusion:Participation in bilateral and equitable international electives is a unique experience of personal and professional growth. There is an interest in these opportunities during residency training among Otolaryngology residents that is not reflected in availability within training programs. This suggests the need for development of humanitarian outreach exposure through global health experiences during surgical residency training.

Otolaryngology Resident Education and Perceptions of e-cigarettes.

To date, there are no reports of otolaryngology residents' knowledge and confidence in discussing e-cigarette use. The purpose of this study was to evaluate otolaryngology resident e-cigarette knowledge and confidence in counseling patients on e-cigarette use. Cross-sectional national survey. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education otolaryngology residents in the United States. US otolaryngology residents were distributed surveys electronically in September 2020. A total of 150 participants replied for a response rate of 8.88%. The majority, 93.10% have not received formal education on e-cigarettes during their residency training. The most common resource of e-cigarette information overall was social media (78.46%). Within academia, the most common resources of e-cigarette education were patient interactions (63.16%) and colleagues (54.74%). Patients commonly inquire residents about e-cigarettes for smoking cessation (85.07%) and their long-term health effects (83.58%). Almost 67% of residents rarely or never ask patients about e-cigarette use. Only 4.35% of residents are not confident discussing traditional cigarette use, while 58.70% are not confident discussing e-cigarettes. Otolaryngology residents have not received formal education in e-cigarettes and are not confident discussing e-cigarettes with their patients. This highlights the need for e-cigarette education during otolaryngology residency to improve patient e-cigarette counseling.