Osteoporosis Medication Use Research Articles

Assessing the Value of Imaging Data in Machine Learning Models to Predict Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients.

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) affects over 650 million patients worldwide. Total knee replacement is aimed at end-stage OA to relieve symptoms of pain, stiffness and reduced mobility. However, the role of imaging modalities in monitoring symptomatic disease progression remains unclear. This study aimed to compare machine learning (ML) models, with and without imaging features, in predicting the two-year Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score for knee OA patients. We included 2408 patients from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) database, with 629 patients from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST) database. The clinical dataset included 18 clinical features, while the imaging dataset contained an additional 10 imaging features. Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) was set to 24, reflecting meaningful physical impairment. Clinical and imaging dataset models produced similar area under curve (AUC) scores, highlighting low differences in performance AUC < 0.025). For both clinical and imaging datasets, Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) models performed the best in the external validation, with a clinically acceptable AUC of 0.734 (95% CI 0.687-0.781) and 0.747 (95% CI 0.701-0.792), respectively. The five features identified included educational background, family history of osteoarthritis, co-morbidities, use of osteoporosis medications and previous knee procedures. This is the first study to demonstrate that ML models achieve comparable performance with and without imaging features.

Factors Impacting Fall Severity in Hospitalized Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Objectives: This retrospective case-controlled study aimed to evaluate the association between the severity of fall-related injuries and fall-risk-increasing drugs (FRIDs) in hospitalized patients. Methods: Data were collected from Changhua Christian Hospital, Taiwan, of all adult inpatients who experienced falls between January 2017 and December 2021, and were divided into two groups based on whether they sustained severe fall-related injuries. Retrospective data that may affect the severity of fall-related injuries and the use of FRIDs were investigated. Results: Among 1231 documented cases of falls, 26 patients sustained severe fall-related injuries. Older patients and those with osteoporosis were more susceptible to more severe injuries from a fall. The use of mobility aids and osteoporosis medications showed protective effects against fall injuries. No significant association was observed between fall-related injuries and comorbidities or FRIDs. Multivariate analysis confirmed the inverse correlation between the use of mobility aids, osteoporosis medications, and fall severity. Patients with osteoporosis exhibited significantly higher odds of sustaining more severe injuries with a fall (odds ratio = 3.02, 95% confidence interval: 1.21-7.53). Conclusions: This study highlights the importance of addressing risk factors associated with fall severity among hospitalized patients. Providing mobility aids to persons at greater risk.

Osteoporosis Management in Patients with Hip Fracture post Fall

Introduction: Osteoporosis increases the risk of fragility fracture. Hip fractures are associated with poor outcomes. Men are under-screened and under-treated for osteoporosis, which tends to be secondary, and men have higher mortality and worse outcomes after hip fracture than do women. This study aimed to describe patients admitted with hip fracture following minimal trauma and to explore any gender differences in calcium and vitamin D deficiency and use of osteoporosis medication before admission. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study included all patients admitted to Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital with a fracture of the hip post fall, with or without surgery, from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019. Each patient's electronic medical record was reviewed to collect data. The data were extracted and analysed using GraphPad Prism 9.5.1. Unpaired Student's t-tests and Fisher's exact test were used in the analysis. Results: A total of 203 patients were included with a mean age of 83.5 ± 8.8 years and a range of 40 to 103 years, with over half (51.2%) aged 81 to 90 years. Fifty-nine (29.1%) were male. Of 196 patients with vitamin D levels available, 78 (39.8%) had a deficiency, including 30 of 57 (52.6%) males and 48 of 139 (34.5%) females. Males were twice as likely to be vitamin D deficient as were females on admission (OR 2.106; 95% CI 1.143 to 3.939; p = 0.0243). Of 203 patients, 39 (19.2%) were on osteoporosis treatment before admission, including 6 of 59 (10.2%) male and 33 of 144 (22.9%) female patients. Males were 2.6 times more likely to have had no osteoporosis treatment before admission than were females (OR 2.626; 95% CI 1.059 to 6.340; p = 0.0486). Conclusions: Males were more likely to have vitamin D deficiency and not be prescribed osteoporosis medication before admission in a cohort of patients admitted to the hospital with hip fracture post minimal trauma. To prevent hip fracture and resultant hospitalization, increased awareness is needed in diagnosing and managing osteoporosis in men, ideally occurring in the community.

Bone Health Evaluations and Secondary Fragility Fractures in Hip Fracture Patients.

This study sought to examine the utilization of bone health evaluations in geriatric hip fracture patients and identify risk factors for the development of future fragility fractures. A consecutive series of patients ≥55 years who underwent surgical management of a hip fracture between September 2015 and July 2019 were identified. Chart review was performed to evaluate post-injury follow-up, performance of a bone health evaluation, and use of osteoporosis-related diagnostic and pharmacologic treatment. A total of 832 patients were included. The mean age of the patients was 81.2±9.9 years. Approximately 21% of patients underwent a comprehensive bone health evaluation. Of this cohort, 64.7% were started on pharmacologic therapy, and 73 patients underwent bone mineral density testing. Following discharge from the hospital, 70.3% of the patients followed-up on an outpatient basis with 95.7% seeing orthopedic surgery for post-fracture care. Overall, 102 patients (12.3%) sustained additional fragility fractures within two years, and 31 of these patients (3.7%) sustained a second hip fracture. There was no difference in the rate of second hip fractures or other additional fragility fractures based on the use of osteoporosis medications. Management of osteoporosis in geriatric hip fracture patients could be improved. Outpatient follow-up post-hip fracture is almost 70%, yet a minority of patients were started on osteoporosis medications and many sustained additional fragility fractures. The findings of this study indicate that orthopedic surgeons have an opportunity to lead the charge in treatment of osteoporosis in the post-fracture setting.

Bone health in women with premature ovarian insufficiency/early menopause: a 23-year longitudinal analysis.

Bone health in women with premature ovarian insufficiency/early menopause: a 23-year longitudinal analysis.

Osteoporotic Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty Have a Similar 5-Year Cumulative Incidence Rate of Periprosthetic Fracture Regardless of Cemented Versus Cementless Femoral Stem Fixation

BackgroundIn osteoporotic patients, surgeons may utilize cemented femoral fixation to minimize risk of fracture. The purpose of this study was to compare 5-year implant survivability in patients who have osteoporosis who underwent elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) with cementless versus cemented fixation. MethodsA retrospective analysis of patients who have osteoporosis undergoing THA with either cemented or cementless femoral fixation was conducted using a national administrative claims database. Of the 18,431 identified THA patients who have osteoporosis, 15,867 (86.1%) underwent cementless fixation. The primary outcome was a comparison of the 5-year cumulative incidences of aseptic revision, mechanical loosening, and periprosthetic fracture (PPF). Kaplan–Meier and Multivariable Cox Proportional Hazard Ratio analyses were used, controlling for femoral fixation method, age, sex, a comorbidity scale, use of osteoporosis medication, and important comorbidity. ResultsThere was no difference in aseptic revision (Hazard’s Ratio (HR): 1.13; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.79 to 1.62; P value: .500) and PPF (HR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.64 to 1.44; P value: .858) within 5 years of THA between fixation cohorts. However, patients who had cemented fixation were more likely to suffer mechanical loosening with 5 years post-THA (HR: 1.79; 95% CI: 1.17 to 2.71; P-value: .007). ConclusionsWe found a similar 5-year rate of PPF when comparing patients who underwent cementless versus cemented femoral fixation for elective THA regardless of preoperative diagnosis of osteoporosis. While existing registry data support the use of cemented fixation in elderly patients, a more thorough understanding of the interplay between age, osteoporosis, and implant design is needed to delineate in whom cemented fixation is most warranted for PPF prevention.

Denosumab use reduces risk of rheumatoid arthritis in patients with osteoporosis.

To investigate the protective effect of osteoporosis medications on the risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients with osteoporosis. We conducted a retrospective cohort study from 1 January, 2011 to 31 March, 2023. There was a total of 971901 patients from a hospital-based population in Taiwan. In this cohort, there was a total of 17065 osteoporosis patients with or without pathological fracture. In these patients, 7180 patients were osteoporosis medication users, and 9605 patients were non-osteoporosis medication users, after exclusion of previous RA. The risk of RA in the patients with osteoporosis medications was assessed, and stratified by sex and different medications, including bisphosphonates, denosumab, raloxifene and teriparatide. Patients with osteoporosis medication use had a reduced risk of RA compared with non-osteoporosis medication users [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR)=0.484, 95%CI: 0.270-0.867, p<0.05), after adjusting for age, comorbidites and medications. Specifically, patients with ever use of bisphosphonates (n=2069) or denosumab (n=4510) had a reduced risk of RA (aHR=0.405, 95%CI: 0.173-0.951, p<0.05, and aHR=0.394, 95%CI: 0.192-0.809, p<0.05, respectively). Notably, patients that only used denosumab (n=2938) had a further reduced risk of RA (aHR=0.32, 95%CI: 0.12-0.83, p<0.05), particularly in female patients (aHR=0.26, 95%CI: 0.09-0.74, p<0.05). Patients taking raloxifene or teriparatide did not have a significantly reduced risk of RA. Denosumab use reduces the risk of RA in patients with osteoporosis. Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL) mediated osteoclast joint damage may be involved in the pathogenesis of RA during the preclinical stage.

Secondary fracture prevention with osteoporosis medication after a fragility fracture in Sweden remains low despite new guidelines

SummaryThis national register study investigated osteoporosis medication prescriptions for secondary fracture prevention among older Swedish adults. Although prescription proportions are increasing for both men and women, they remain low, especially among individuals aged 90 and older. Improved Fracture Liaison Services could increase the prescription proportions and should be bolstered.PurposeDespite clear guidelines for secondary fracture prevention among older adults, it seems undertreatment persists. We aimed to describe secondary fracture prevention with medical osteoporosis treatment in the older Swedish population. Specifically, how prescription has changed over time and if these patterns differ in sociodemographic subgroups.MethodsBetween 2007 and 2020, osteoporosis medication use was studied among all Swedish residents aged 70 and older who had a fragility fracture in the previous 5 years. Previous fragility fractures were defined as fractures of the humerus, wrist, hip, or vertebrae. Osteoporosis medication was defined as any prescription of bone-enhancing medications (including bisphosphonates and denosumab).ResultsOsteoporosis medication increased over the study period, especially among men. Prescription among individuals 90 + was consistently two- to threefold lower compared to 70–79- and 80–89-year-olds. In 2018–2020, 8–17% of women and 5–9% of men, depending on age, received osteoporosis medication. At the beginning of the study period, women with higher education were more likely to be prescribed osteoporosis medication, though this difference decreased over time. Prescription of vitamin D and/or calcium as the only treatment was more common than osteoporosis medications throughout the study period.ConclusionDespite increasing prescription proportions, medical treatment for secondary fracture prevention remains low. In addition, it is more common to be prescribed vitamin D or calcium than osteoporosis medication after a fragility fracture, contrary to current guidelines. These results indicate that there is room for improvement for Fracture Liaison Services in Sweden.

Frank Stinchfield Award: Creation of a Patient-Specific Total Hip Arthroplasty Periprosthetic Fracture Risk Calculator

BackgroundMany risk factors have been described for periprosthetic femur fracture (PPFFx) following total hip arthroplasty (THA), yet a patient-specific risk assessment tool remains elusive. The purpose of this study was to develop a high-dimensional, patient-specific risk-stratification nomogram that allows dynamic risk modification based on operative decisions. MethodsWe evaluated 16,696 primary nononcologic THAs performed between 1998 and 2018. During a mean 6-year follow-up, 558 patients (3.3%) sustained a PPFFx. Patients were characterized by individual natural language processing-assisted chart review on nonmodifiable factors (demographics, THA indication, and comorbidities), and modifiable operative decisions (femoral fixation [cemented/uncemented], surgical approach [direct anterior, lateral, and posterior], and implant type [collared/collarless]). Multivariable Cox regression models and nomograms were developed with PPFFx as a binary outcome at 90 days, 1 year, and 5 years, postoperatively. ResultsPatient-specific PPFFx risk based on comorbid profile was wide-ranging from 0.4-18% at 90 days, 0.4%-20% at 1 year, and 0.5%-25% at 5 years. Among 18 evaluated patient factors, 7 were retained in multivariable analyses. The 4 significant nonmodifiable factors included the following: women (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.6), older age (HR = 1.2 per 10 years), diagnosis of osteoporosis or use of osteoporosis medications (HR = 1.7), and indication for surgery other than osteoarthritis (HR = 2.2 for fracture, HR = 1.8 for inflammatory arthritis, HR = 1.7 for osteonecrosis). The 3 modifiable surgical factors were included as follows: uncemented femoral fixation (HR = 2.5), collarless femoral implants (HR = 1.3), and surgical approach other than direct anterior (lateral HR = 2.9, posterior HR = 1.9). ConclusionThis patient-specific PPFFx risk calculator demonstrated a wide-ranging risk based on comorbid profile and enables surgeons to quantify risk mitigation based on operative decisions. Level of EvidenceLevel III, Prognostic.

National trends in osteoporosis medication use among Medicare beneficiaries with and without Alzheimer's disease/related dementias.

Osteoporotic fractures are a leading cause of disability and premature death in the elderly. Patients with Alzheimer's and related dementia (ADRD) have high rates of osteoporosis (OP) and substantial risk of osteoporotic fractures. Yet research is sparse on trends and predictors of OP medication use in ADRD. Medicare beneficiaries with OP aged ≥ 67years have Medicare parts A/B/D without HMO from 2016 to 2018. Our outcome was receipt of OP medications in 2018. A multivariable logistic regression assessed association between ADRD and OP drug prescribing, adjusted for age, sex, race, region, Medicare entitlement, dual Medicaid eligibility, chronic conditions, number of provider visits/hospitalizations, and nursing home (NH) resident status. Age/ADRD and NH residency/ADRD interactions were tested. Our sample consisted of 47,871 people with OP and ADRD and 201,840 with OP without ADRD. OP drug use was 38.6% in ADRD patients vs. 52.7% in non-ADRD. After adjustment for demographics, chronic conditions, and previous hospitalizations/physician visits, the OR for OP drug in ADRD vs. non-ADRD was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.83-0.87). NH residents had lower odds for OP medication (OR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.58-0.64). There were significant interactions between ADRD and age, and between ADRD and NH residency. The OR for OP drug use associated with ADRD was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.86-0.90) among community-dwelling elders and 0.66 (95% CI: 0.64-0.69) among NH residents. ADRD patients received OP drugs at a lower rate than their non-ADRD counterparts. More research is needed on when to prescribe or deprescribe OP drugs in the context of different ADRD severity, patient preferences, remaining life expectancy, and time-to-benefit from OP drugs.

TRENDS IN OSTEOPOROSIS DRUG USE AMONG MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES WITH &amp; WITHOUT ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE/RELATED DEMENTIAS

Abstract Background Osteoporotic fractures are a leading cause of disability and premature death in the elderly. Patients with Alzheimer’s and related dementia (ADRD) have high rates of osteoporosis (OP) and substantial risk of osteoporotic fractures. Yet research is sparse on trends and predictors of OP medication use in ADRD. Methods Medicare beneficiaries with OP aged ≥67 years with Medicare parts A/B/D without HMO from 2016–2018. Outcome was receipt of OP medications in 2018. A multivariable logistic regression assessed association between ADRD and OP drug prescribing, adjusted for age, sex, race, region, Medicare entitlement, dual Medicaid eligibility, chronic conditions, number of provider visits/hospitalizations, and nursing home (NH) resident status. Age/ADRD and NH residency/ADRD interactions were tested. Results Sample consisted of 47,871 people with OP and ADRD and 201,840 with OP without ADRD. OP drug use was 38.6% in ADRD patients vs. 52.7% in non-ADRD. After adjustment for demographics, chronic conditions, previous hospitalizations/physician visits, the OR for OP drug in ADRD vs. Non-ADRD was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.83–0.87). NH residents had lower odds for OP medication (OR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.58–0.64). There were significant interactions between ADRD/age and between ADRD/NH residency. The OR for OP drug use associated with ADRD was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.86–0.90) among community-dwelling elders and 0.66 (95% CI: 0.64–0.69) among NH residents. Conclusions: ADRD patients received OP drugs at lower rates than non-ADRD counterparts. More research is needed on prescribing or deprescribing OP drugs in context of ADRD severity, patient preferences, remaining life expectancy and time-to-benefit from OP drugs.

Controversies in Osteoporosis Treatment of Nursing Home Residents.

Osteoporotic fractures are a common and serious health problem for older adults living in nursing homes (NHs). Risk of fracture increases with age and dementia status, yet gaps in evidence result in controversies around when to start and stop treatment for osteoporosis in NH residents, particularly those who have high fracture risk but have limited life expectancy. In this article, we discuss these areas of controversy. We provide an overview of current guidelines that explicitly address osteoporosis treatment strategies for NH residents, review the evidence for osteoporosis medications in NH residents, and use these sources to suggest practical recommendations for clinical practice and for research. Three published guidelines (from the United States, Canada, and Australia) and several studies provide the current basis for clinical decisions about osteoporosis treatment for NH residents. Practical approaches may include broad use of vitamin D and selective use of osteoporosis medication based on risks, benefits, and goals of care. Clinicians still lack strong evidence to guide treatment of NH residents with advanced dementia, multimorbidity, or severe mobility impairment. Future priorities for research include identifying optimal approaches to risk stratification and prevention strategies for NH residents and evaluating the risk-benefit profile of pharmacologic treatments for osteoporosis NH residents across key clinical strata. In the absence of such evidence, decisions for initiating and continuing treatment should reflect a patient-centered approach that incorporates life expectancy, goals of care, and the potential burden of treatment.

Trends in osteoporosis medication use in US postmenopausal women: analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2000 through 2017-2018.

This study aimed to examine trends in the use of osteoporosis medications in postmenopausal women between 1999-2000 and 2017-2018. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data were analyzed to describe trends in the use of osteoporosis medications in US women 50 years and older. Joinpoint regression software was used to detect points at which significant changes in the direction and magnitude of the trends occurred over time. Logistic regression models adjusted for potential confounders were assembled to determine the independent association between time period (2007-2008 vs 2017-2018) and osteoporosis medication use. Of 13,826 postmenopausal women, about 7% reported taking osteoporosis medications. Joinpoint regression demonstrated that the prevalence of women taking osteoporosis medications significantly decreased by -23.3% on average (95% confidence interval [CI], -23.3% to -37.7%) per survey cycle between 2007-2008 and 2017-2018. Similarly, bisphosphonate use decreased by -22.6% on average (95% CI, -38.8% to -2.1%) from 2007 to 2008 onward. Logistic regression demonstrated that, after adjustment for potential confounders including bone mineral density and self-reported hip or spine fractures, postmenopausal women were 61% and 56% less likely to use any osteoporosis medications and bisphosphonates in 2017 to 2018 compared with their counterparts in 2007 to 2008, respectively. The use of osteoporosis medications in postmenopausal US women has significantly decreased since 2007 to 2008 onward. This finding was mostly attributed to a low prescription rate of bisphosphonate drugs. Moreover, the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women was suboptimal and decreased over time.

Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scanner mismatch in follow-up bone mineral density testing.

Detecting significant changes in bone mineral density (BMD) with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanners relies on the least significant change (LSC). Results from two different DXA scanners can only be compared, albeit with decreased sensitivity for change, if the LSC between the two scanners has been directly determined through cross-calibration. Performing follow-up DXA scans on non-cross-calibrated scanners (scanner mismatch) has safety and economic implications. This study aims to determine the proportion of scanner mismatch occurring at a population level. All patients who completed at least two DXA scans between 1 April 2009 and 31 December 2018 in the province of Alberta, Canada, were identified using population-based health services databases. Scanner mismatch was defined as a follow-up DXA scan completed on a DXA scanner that differed from and was not cross-calibrated to the previous DXA scanner. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess predictive factors that may contribute to scanner mismatch. A total of 264,866 patients with 470,641 follow-up DXA scans were identified. Scanner mismatch occurred in 18.9% of follow-up DXA scans; 28.7% of patients experienced at least one scanner mismatch. Longer duration between scans (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.24-1.26) and major osteoporotic fracture history before index scan (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03-1.08) increased risk of scanner mismatch. Osteoporosis medication use before index scan (OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.88-0.91), recency of follow-up scans (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.73-0.98), female sex (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94-1.00), and age at last scan (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.99-1.00) were associated with lower risk of scanner mismatch. Scanner mismatch is a common problem, occurring in one-in-five follow-up DXA scans and affecting more than a quarter of patients. Interventions to reduce this large proportion of scanner mismatch are necessary.

The association between osteoporosis medications and lowered all-cause mortality after hip or vertebral fracture in older and oldest-old adults: a nationwide population-based study.

Background: Osteoporotic fracture is a common public-health problem in ageing societies. Although post-fracture usage of osteoporosis medications may reduce mortality, recent results have been inconsistent. We aimed to examine associations between osteoporosis medication and mortality in older adults, particularly oldest-old adults (>=85 years old).Methods: Participants aged 65 years old and older newly diagnosed with both osteoporosis and hip or vertebral fractures within 2009-2017 were recruited from the records of 23,455,164 people in Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). Osteoporosis medication exposure was calculated after the first-time ambulatory visit with newly diagnosed osteoporosis. Mortality and its specific causes were ascertained from Cause of Death Data. Patients were followed until death or censored at the end of 2018.Results: A total of 87,935 participants aged 65 years old and over (73.4% female), with a mean 4.13 follow-up years, were included. Taking medication was associated with significantly lower risk of mortality (hip fracture HR 0.75, vertebral fracture HR 0.74), even in the oldest-old adults (hip fracture HR 0.76, vertebral fracture HR 0.72), where a longer duration of taking osteoporosis medication was associated with lower all-cause mortality. Specific causes of mortality were also significantly lower for participants taking osteoporosis medication (cancer HR 0.84 in hip fracture, 0.75 in vertebral fracture; cardiovascular disease HR 0.85 in hip fracture, 0.91 in vertebral fracture).Conclusions: Osteoporosis medication after hip or vertebral fracture may reduce mortality risk in older adults, notably in oldest-old adults. Encouraging the use of post-fracture osteoporosis medication in healthcare policies is warranted.

The effect of low-intensity whole-body vibration with or without high-intensity resistance and impact training on risk factors for proximal femur fragility fracture in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: study protocol for the VIBMOR randomized controlled trial

BackgroundThe prevailing medical opinion is that medication is the primary (some might argue, only) effective intervention for osteoporosis. It is nevertheless recognized that osteoporosis medications are not universally effective, tolerated, or acceptable to patients. Mechanical loading, such as vibration and exercise, can also be osteogenic but the degree, relative efficacy, and combined effect is unknown. The purpose of the VIBMOR trial is to determine the efficacy of low-intensity whole-body vibration (LIV), bone-targeted, high-intensity resistance and impact training (HiRIT), or the combination of LIV and HiRIT on risk factors for hip fracture in postmenopausal women with osteopenia and osteoporosis.MethodsPostmenopausal women with low areal bone mineral density (aBMD) at the proximal femur and/or lumbar spine, with or without a history of fragility fracture, and either on or off osteoporosis medications will be recruited. Eligible participants will be randomly allocated to one of four trial arms for 9 months: LIV, HiRIT, LIV + HiRIT, or control (low-intensity, home-based exercise). Allocation will be block-randomized, stratified by use of osteoporosis medications. Testing will be performed at three time points: baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1; 9 months), and 1 year thereafter (T2; 21 months) to examine detraining effects. The primary outcome measure will be total hip aBMD determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Secondary outcomes will include aBMD at other regions, anthropometrics, and other indices of bone strength, body composition, physical function, kyphosis, muscle strength and power, balance, falls, and intervention compliance. Exploratory outcomes include bone turnover markers, pelvic floor health, quality of life, physical activity enjoyment, adverse events, and fracture. An economic evaluation will also be conducted.DiscussionNo previous studies have compared the effect of LIV alone or in combination with bone-targeted HiRIT (with or without osteoporosis medications) on risk factors for hip fracture in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. Should either, both, or combined mechanical interventions be safe and efficacious, alternative therapeutic avenues will be available to individuals at elevated risk of fragility fracture who are unresponsive to or unwilling or unable to take osteoporosis medications.Trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (www. anzctr.org.au) (Trial number ANZCTR12615000848505, https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id = 368962); date of registration 14/08/2015 (prospectively registered). Universal Trial Number: U1111-1172-3652.

Timing of osteoporosis therapies following fracture: the current status.

In most patients, osteoporosis is diagnosed only after the occurrence of the first fragility fracture. It is of utmost importance to start osteoporosis medications immediately in these patients to prevent future fractures and also to reduce associated mortality and morbidity. There remains a hesitancy over initiating osteoporotic medications, specifically for antiresorptive agents like bisphosphonates following an acute fracture due to concern over their effect on fracture healing. The purpose of this review is to study the effect of the timing of initiation of different osteoporosis medications on healing after an acute fracture. Most of the human studies, including randomized control trials (RCTs), did not find any significant negative effect on fracture healing with early use of bisphosphonate after an acute fracture. Anabolic agents like teriparatide have shown either neutral or beneficial effects on fracture healing and thus can be started very early following any osteoporotic fracture. Although human studies on the early use of other osteoporosis medications like denosumab or strontium ranelate are very sparse in the literature, none of these medications have shown any evidence of delay in fracture healing. To summarize, among the commonly used anti-osteoporosis agents, both bisphosphonates and teriparatide are safe to be initiated in the early acute post-fracture period. Moreover, teriparatide has shown some evidence in favor of reducing fracture healing time.

Call for NICE to reverse decision to reject novel osteoporosis drug

Clinicians are calling for the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) to reconsider its provisional decision not to recommend use of the first new osteoporosis medication it has considered for more than a decade. Romosozumab, which works by both inducing new bone formation and reducing bone breakdown, is one of only two treatments […]

Predictive factors of non-treatment and non-persistence to osteoporosis medication after fragility hip fractures at 3years after discharge: a multicentre, prospective cohort study in the northern Kyushu district of Japan.

Fragility hip fractures (FHF) caused by osteoporosis decrease the quality of life and worsen life expectancy. Use of osteoporosis medication may be an efficient method in the prevention of secondary FHF. However, previous studies have reported low rates of osteoporosis medication and persistence after FHF. This study aimed to evaluate osteoporosis medication use and factors affecting persistence in patients with FHF in the northern Kyushu area of Japan. A total of 497 FHF patients aged ≥ 60years with a 3-year follow-up were included. We prospectively collected data from questionnaires sent every 6months regarding compliance with osteoporosis medication. We compared baseline characteristics among three groups: no treatment (NT), no persistence (NP), and persistence (P), and conducted multivariable regression models to determine covariates associated with non-treatment (NT vs. NP/P) and non-persistence (NP vs. P). There were 219 (44.1%), 151 (30.4%), and 127 (25.5%) patients in the NT, NP, and P groups, respectively. Factors associated with non-treatment were male sex, chronic kidney disease, no previous osteoporosis treatment, and low Barthel index (BI) at discharge. The only factor associated with non-persistence was a low BI at discharge. Factors associated with a low BI at discharge were male sex, older age, trochanteric fracture, and surgical delay. Low BI at discharge is a risk factor for both non-treatment and non-persistence to osteoporosis medication. Therefore, appropriate interventions to improve BI may result in persistence to osteoporosis medication.

Heavy clinical and economic burden of osteoporotic fracture among elderly female Medicare beneficiaries.

Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis are stratified to high and very-high fracture risk categories, and this categorization drives algorithms for osteoporosis management in osteoporosis treatment guidelines. This study comprehensively describes a very-high-risk cohort. This retrospective cohort study used the Medicare 20% database; elderly women with an outpatient visit in 2011 and fracture within 2 years before the visit were included. Outcomes included fracture risk, all-cause and fracture-related healthcare resource utilization and cost, and osteoporosis medication use in the 5 years after the visit. Overall, 43,193 patients were included. The 5-year probability was 0.36 for major fracture and 0.11 and 0.17 for hip fracture and vertebral fracture, respectively, much higher than the guidelines' 10-year probability thresholds for very-high-risk (0.3 for major fracture, 0.045 for hip fracture). Rates of hospitalizations, emergency department visits or observation stays, and skilled nursing facility stays in year 1 were 53.7, 57.0, and 18.8 per 100 patient-years, respectively, decreasing slightly in subsequent years. Mean healthcare cost was $23,700 in year 1, decreasing to $18,500 in year 5. About 29.1% of patients received osteoporosis medications in year 1, decreasing to 16.9% by year 5. Rates for all outcomes, especially fractures, were much higher among vertebral and multiple fracture cohorts. Elderly women with a fracture within last 2 years were at very-high-risk for subsequent fracture and high healthcare utilization and cost, especially those with vertebral or multiple fractures. However, rates of fracture prevention treatments were low. More effort is needed to identify and treat patients at very-high-risk for fracture.