POINT-COUNTERPOINT COMMENTSThe muscle pump, What question do we want to answer?M. Harold LaughlinM. Harold LaughlinPublished Online:01 Aug 2005https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00578.2005MoreSectionsPDF (33 KB)Download PDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesGet permissionsTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInEmailWeChat This letter is in response to the Point-Counterpoint series “The muscle pump is/is not an important determinant of muscle blood flow during exercise” that appeared in the July issue (vol. 99: 371–375, 2005; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00381; http://jap.physiology.org/content/vol99/issue1).Letter to the Editor: Our group has a long-standing interest in the muscle pump (MP) hypothesis of Pollack, Folkow, and colleagues to explain interactions of gravity and muscle contractions on venous pressure and blood flow (BF) in human limbs (2). The MP may provide up to 60% of the driving force for BF in humans during locomotion (1, 2, 4), yet there is a growing number of types of contractile activity where there is no MP effect. I wish a full accounting of mechanisms producing the following two observations could be provided without invoking the MP: 1) How can human and animal muscle BFs be as high as 3–5 ml·min−1·g−1 during locomotion (1)?, and 2) How can going from supine to the upright posture produce a twofold increase in exercise BF in humans (4)? However, a demonstration that the MP has little or no effect on BF in different forms of muscle contraction or models of exercise [even from our laboratory (3)] will not answer the fundamental question: does the MP contribute importantly to muscle BF during locomotory exercise (1)? All agree that a number of types of muscle contraction exhibit no MP effect. Whether rhythmic muscle contraction produces a MP effect depends on complex interactions of a number of mechanical factors (2). Finally, if the MP aids venous return it must also aid muscle BF.REFERENCES1 Laughlin MH. Skeletal muscle blood flow capacity: role of muscle pump in exercise hyperemia. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 253: H993–H1004, 1987.Link | ISI | Google Scholar2 Laughlin MH and Joyner M. Closer to the edge? Contractions, pressures, waterfalls and blood flow to contracting skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol 94: 3–5, 2003.Link | ISI | Google Scholar3 Laughlin MH and Schrage WG. Effects of muscle contraction on skeletal muscle blood flow: when is there a muscle pump? Med Sci Sports Exerc 31: 1027–1035, 1999.Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar4 Shiotani I, Sato H, Yokoyama H, Ohnishi Y, Hishida E, Kinjo K, Nakatani D, Kuzuya T, and Hori M. Muscle pump-dependent self-perfusion mechanism in legs in normal subjects and patients with heart failure. J Appl Physiol 92: 1647–1654, 2002.Link | ISI | Google Scholar Download PDF Previous Back to Top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedInformationCited ByCardiovascular Response During Exercise28 November 2019In Vivo Models of Muscle Stimulation and Mechanical Loading in Bone MechanobiologyEffects of Intermittent Pneumatic Compression on Leg Vascular Function in People with Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Study3 August 2017 | The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, Vol. 42, No. 5Silent Pumpers: A Comparative Topical Overview of the Peristaltic Pumping Principle in Living Nature, Engineering, and Biomimetics14 June 2019 | Advanced Intelligent Systems, Vol. 1, No. 2Characterizing rapid-onset vasodilation to single muscle contractions in the human legDaniel P. Credeur, Seth W. Holwerda, Robert M. Restaino, Phillip M. King, Kiera L. Crutcher, M. Harold Laughlin, Jaume Padilla, and Paul J. Fadel15 February 2015 | Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 118, No. 4Interrelation between external oscillatory muscle coupling amplitude and in vivo intramedullary pressure related bone adaptationBone, Vol. 66Dynamic fluid flow stimulation on cortical bone and alterations of the gene expressions of osteogenic growth factors and transcription factors in a rat functional disuse modelArchives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Vol. 545Cardiovascular Response During Exercise8 July 2013Mechanotransduction in Musculoskeletal Tissue Regeneration: Effects of Fluid Flow, Loading, and Cellular-Molecular PathwaysBioMed Research International, Vol. 2014Dynamic hydraulic fluid stimulation regulated intramedullary pressureBone, Vol. 57, No. 1Dynamic hydraulic flow stimulation on mitigation of trabecular bone loss in a rat functional disuse modelBone, Vol. 51, No. 4Bone blood flow is influenced by muscle contractionsJournal of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Vol. 04, No. 07Intramedullary pressure and matrix strain induced by oscillatory skeletal muscle stimulation and its potential in adaptationJournal of Biomechanics, Vol. 42, No. 2 More from this issue > Volume 99Issue 2August 2005Pages 774-774 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2005 the American Physiological Societyhttps://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00578.2005PubMed16020444History Published online 1 August 2005 Published in print 1 August 2005 Metrics