Distinct patterns of vegetation on ancient lake sediments in Ruby Valley, Nev., define differences in soil-water-plant relations resulting either from differences in depth to ground water or from differences in water-retention capacities of soils deriving water only from precipitation. In order of increasing depth to ground water, dominant plant species are Juncus balticus, Distichlis stricta, Potentilla fruticosa, Elymus cinereus, Sarcobatus vermiculatus, and Chrysothamnusnauseosus. Dominant species on soils in order of increasing water-retention capacity are Artemesia tridentada nova, Chrysothamnus viscidiflorous pumilus, Ceratoides lanata, A rtemesia tridentada tridentada, A triplex nuttallii gardneri, and Atriplex confertifok Minimum and maximum levels of soil-water stress measured were systematically related to waterretention capacities of soils. A relationship was defined that permits approximation of amounts of water evapotranspired by different plant communities from percent of area under live plant cover. There are separate relationships, relating plant cover to amounts of plant stress or to amount of water evapotranspired, for habitats that receive water from the water table and those that do not. Levels of osmotic stress encountered in surface soils appear to influence plant-community distribution. Plant communities found in habitats ranging from mesic to xeric, and on sediments ranging from clay to gravel in Ruby Valley, Nev., (Fig. 1) provided an opportunity to investigate soil-waterplant relationships under a wide range of conditions. The information obtained is directly applicable to similar high valleys in the Great Basin. Knowledge obtained concerning mechanisms of moisture retention by soils and its subsequent depletion by evapotranspiration has even wider potential for application.