Osmotic Blood-brain Barrier Disruption Research Articles

Osmotic blood–brain barrier disruption chemotherapy for diffuse pontine gliomas

The prognosis for patients with diffuse pontine gliomas (DPG) remains poor. New aggressive innovative treatments are necessary to treat this disease. From 1984 to 1998, eight patients (4M/4F), median age 11 years, with DPG were treated with monthly osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption (BBBD) chemotherapy using intraarterial carboplatin or methotrexate and intravenous cytoxan and etoposide. Patients presented for a median duration of 6 weeks with increased intracranial pressure, long tract signs, diplopia, ataxia, and nausea/vomiting. DPG was demonstrated on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in seven patients and on CT in one. Two patients had biopsies that showed an astrocytoma and an anaplastic astrocytoma. Three tumors enhanced on MR imaging after contrast administration. Three patients had radiation therapy before BBBD chemotherapy and four afterwards. Two patients had chemotherapy (tamoxifen, topotecan) before BBBD chemotherapy and two afterwards. In general, patients were evaluated with MR imaging every 3 months to monitor for a response to treatment. The median number of chemotherapy cycles that were administered by BBBD was 10, mean 10. Three patients also received one, two, or three cycles of intraarterial chemotherapy without BBBD. One patient that was started on carboplatin was converted to methotrexate, and five that were started on the methotrexate protocol were later converted over to carboplatin. One patient received monthly methotrexate followed by 14 days of procarbazine and one patient started on methotrexate was switched to navelbine. MR imaging demonstrated two partial responses, five patients with stable disease, and one with disease progression. The median time to tumor progression was 15 months with the range from <1 to 40 months. The median survival from the time of diagnosis was 27 months, ranging from 7 to 80 months. The median survival time from the first BBBD or intraarterial treatment was 16.5 months, ranging from 5 to 69 months. One patient was lost to follow-up with an unknown date of death. Although the sample size is small, the TTP and survival times are longer than those previously reported in other DPG series. In addition, the ability to demonstrate stable disease or partial responses in DPG on MR imaging argues for the therapeutic benefit of BBBD chemotherapy. The enhanced delivery of chemotherapy afforded by osmotic BBBD supports the further examination of this treatment modality for patients with DPG.

Enhanced chemotherapy delivery by intraarterial infusion and blood‐brain barrier disruption in malignant brain tumors

The treatment of malignant brain tumors is hampered by the presence of the blood-brain barrier, which limits chemotherapy penetration to the central nervous system (CNS). In recent years, different strategies have been designed to circumvent this physiologic barrier. The osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption (BBBD) procedure is one such strategy, and has been studied extensively in preclinical and clinical studies. The authors detail their experience so far with the procedure in the context of an open Phase II study in the treatment of malignant brain tumors. Patients with histologically proven malignant gliomas, primitive neuroectodermal tumors, primary CNS lymphomas, and metastatic disease to the brain were eligible. Patients enrolled were treated every 4 weeks (1 cycle) for < or = 12 cycles. A methotrexate-based regimen was offered to patients with lymphomas, whereas a carboplatin-based regimen was offered to patients with all other histologies. Before intraarterial chemotherapy infusion, patients were submitted to an osmotic BBBD procedure. Seventy-two patients were included in the current report. The overall median survival times (MST) from treatment initiation for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), anaplastic oligodendrogliomas, primary CNS lymphomas, and metastases were, respectively, 9.1, 13.9, not reached, and 9.9 months, whereas time to disease progression was 4.1, 9.2, 12.3, and 3.3 months. The MST from diagnosis was 32.2 months for GBM. These encouraging results prompted the authors to further refine their knowledge of the potential contribution of this procedure in the treatment of brain tumors. These authors designed a randomized Phase III study for patients with GBM that is now open.

La barrière hémato-encéphalique : un facteur clé en Neuro-oncologie

Limited therapeutic success in the treatment of CNS neoplasia with chemotherapy is generally attributed to two factors: natural or acquired resistance to chemotherapy expressed by tumor cells, and delivery impediment related to the blood-brain barrier. The anatomic and physiological properties of the normal blood-brain barrier prevent passage of ionized water-soluble compounds with a molecular weight greater than 500 Daltons. Although complex, the blood-brain barrier basically functions at the level of the tight junctions of the cerebral vascular endothelial cells. Different approaches have been advocated to improve delivery across the blood-brain barrier. One such approach, transient osmotic permeabilization of the blood-brain barrier, is an invasive procedure offering the potential of global delivery. This strategy involves cerebral intravascular infusion of a hypertonic solution to produce, in a given cerebral distribution (carotid or vertebral), producing a transient increase in blood-brain barrier permeability. Two parameters are paramount in the ability to mediate a hyperosmolar modification of the barrier: the osmolality of the solution, and the infusion time. The procedure has been found to produce a marked increase (10- to 100-fold) in brain and cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of methotrexate and of other markers. Pre-clinical studies are underway to assess the use of this procedure to improve delivery of different molecules, including standard chemotherapy, monoclonal antibodies and gene therapy molecules. This approach has been standardized for clinical use. It has been extensively used in patients. Using a standard protocol of osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption to enhance chemotherapy delivery with three different chemotherapy regimens, more than 3000 procedures have been performed in more than 300 patients across the blood-brain barrier distribution consortium, an entity which includes six university centers coordinated by the Oregon Health Sciences University. The procedure has been found to be safe, with very limited toxicity. As part of this consortium, the Sherbrooke University center has been offering this treatment modality since November 1999. We have performed more than 500 procedures in 122 patients with various histologies (malignant gliomas, primary central nervous system lymphoma and metastasis) with low toxicity. In our view, the median survival rate of 138 weeks obtained with glioblastoma multiforme patients is promising; further research to improve these results is needed.

Prospects for gene therapy in the fragile X syndrome.

"If politics is the art of the possible, research is the art of the soluble. Both are immensely practical-minded affairs." P. B. Medawar.Gene therapy is unarguably the definitive way to treat, and possibly cure, genetic diseases. A straightforward concept in theory, in practice it has proven difficult to realize, even when directed to easily accessed somatic cell systems. Gene therapy for diseases in which the central nervous system (CNS) is the target organ presents even greater challenges and diverse vectors and brain delivery approaches are under investigation. We argue that in the case of the fragile X syndrome the approach most likely to have a chance of being effective should consist of a small, diffusible vector derived from the adeno-associated virus, carrying an FMR1 cDNA comprising the 5' promoter region and the 3' untranslated region of the gene, delivered to the entire brain by osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption. The approach can be tested in Fmr1 knockout mice, although changes in their neurobehavioral abnormalities may be difficult to evaluate. A defect in the expression of GABA(A) receptors in these mice-if shown to be a direct consequence of the Fmr1 defect-promises to be a more readily assessable marker of restored FMRp function on gene transfer.

Bone marrow chemoprotection without compromise of chemotherapy efficacy in a rat brain tumor model.

Thiol chemoprotective agents can reduce chemotherapy side effects, but clinical use is limited due to concerns of impaired chemotherapeutic efficacy. We evaluated whether an optimized bone marrow chemoprotection regimen impaired the efficacy of enhanced chemotherapy against rat brain tumors. Nude rats with intracerebral human lung carcinoma xenografts were treated with carboplatin, melphalan, and etoposide phosphate delivered intra-arterially with osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption (n = 8/group). Thiol chemoprotection was N-acetyl-L-cysteine (1000 mg/kg) 60 min before chemotherapy and/or sodium thiosulfate (8 g/m(2)) 4 and 8 h after chemotherapy, when the blood-brain barrier is reestablished. Blood counts were obtained before treatment on day 3 and at sacrifice on day 9. N-acetylcysteine serum clearance half-life was 9 to 11 min. Pretreatment with N-acetylcysteine combined with delayed administration of sodium thiosulfate protected against toxicity toward total white cells, granulocytes, and platelets (P = 0.0016). Enhanced chemotherapy reduced intracerebral tumor volume to 4.3 +/- 1.0 mm(3) compared with 29.1 +/- 4.1 mm(3) in untreated animals (P < 0.0001). Tumor volume was 3.7 +/- 0.6 mm(3) in rats that received N-acetylcysteine before and sodium thiosulfate after chemotherapy. The data indicate the efficacy of enhanced chemotherapy for rat brain tumors was not affected by thiol chemoprotection that provided excellent protection for hematological toxicity. Negative interactions of thiols with antitumor efficacy were avoided by temporal and spatial separation of chemoprotectants and chemotherapy.

Efficacy after sequencing of brain radiotherapy and enhanced antibody targeted chemotherapy delivery in a rodent human lung cancer brain xenograft model

Purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of sequencing radiation therapy (RT) and antibody targeted chemotherapy (BR96-DOX) in nude rats bearing human lung cancer (B.5 LX-1) intracerebral (i.c.) xenografts.Methods and Materials: Our approach was to administer RT using 20 Gy single-fraction cranial irradiation either before, concurrent with, or after BR96-DOX treatment via osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption to enhance immunoconjugate delivery. All rats were inoculated with i.c. B.5 LX-1 tumors and were randomly assigned to treatment groups.Results: BR96-DOX alone on Day 6 or Day 12 significantly increased survival compared to negative control rats receiving no treatment (25.9 ± 2.1 and 23.3 ± 2.5 days vs. 14.8 ± 1.9 days, p < 0.05). Rats that received chemotherapy before radiation (34.0 ± 2.0 days) lived the longest compared to the other sequences (RT prior, 29.5 ± 1.9; RT concurrent, 27.1 ± 2.1). Histopathology of 39 rat brains did not reveal any neuropathology.Conclusions: Enhanced delivery of immunoconjugates is more effective in combination with RT for the treatment of experimental metastatic brain tumors. Moreover, BR96-DOX administration prior to RT significantly increased survival compared to those receiving RT and chemotherapy concurrently (p < 0.05).

Quantification of early blood–brain barrier disruption by in situ brain perfusion technique

Osmotic disruption is currently being used to circumvent the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and enhance the delivery of therapeutic molecules in human brains. To date, however, the time course during the early phase of disruption has not been clarified. In order to demonstrate the rapid change in cerebrovascular permeability after BBB disruption in rats, we developed a method of in situ brain perfusion to demonstrate the earliest reversibility in cerebrovascular permeability. Osmotic BBB disruption was attained by intracarotid infusion of hypertonic mannitol. Perfusate containing [ 14C]-sucrose was infused at different time points following osmotic stress followed by measuring cerebrovascular permeability. The earliest BBB disruption was seen to occur 5 min after osmotic stress, after which the exact time course of cerebrovascular reversibility was studied. The protocol reported here, in contrast with those reported in previous studies, was shown to be qualitative, simple, and fast. In addition, the method can be applied to measure any low BBB permeability molecules. This protocol should be helpful for any research focused on enhancing drug delivery into the brain following osmotic BBB disruption.

Association of total dose intensity of chemotherapy in primary central nervous system lymphoma (human non-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome) and survival.

The importance of enhanced drug delivery in patients with central nervous system (CNS) malignancies has not yet been demonstrated conclusively. Intra-arterial chemotherapy in combination with osmotic bloodbrain barrier disruption (BBBD) increases drug delivery to tumor by 2- to 5-fold and to surrounding brain tissue by 10- to 100-fold as compared with intravenous administration of chemotherapy. Primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) is an excellent model for studying dose intensity because PCNSL is a highly infiltrative, chemosensitive, primary CNS malignancy in which the integrity of the blood-brain barrier is highly variable. Survival time was assessed in 74 non-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome patients with PCNSL who underwent a total of 1047 BBBD procedures. Total dose intensity is estimated by using the number of intraarterial infusions or a cumulative degree of BBBD score. Using proportional hazards multivariable analyses to adjust for baseline characteristics, survival was significantly associated with the total intensity of BBBD (P < 0.05). Additional statistical analyses demonstrate that survival bias does not fully explain these associations. Even when only patients who attained a complete response are considered, increased dose intensity resulted in increased survival. In patients with PCNSL, a chemotherapy-responsive tumor type, survival time is highly associated with total drug dose delivered, even in analyses designed to control for potential survival biases. These results probably constitute the strongest evidence to date of the importance of total dose intensity in treating CNS malignancies.

The effects of the Na +/Ca ++ exchange blocker on osmotic blood–brain barrier disruption

Osmotic disruption of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) by mannitol is currently being used to enhance drug delivery in human brains. Despite clinical and experimental interest, to date the time course in the early phase of disruption has not been accurately identified. The mechanism in barrier closure also remains elusive. We first studied the rapid change in cerebrovascular permeability after BBB disruption in rats, and then demonstrated that the Na +/Ca ++ exchange blocker (KB-R7943) prolongs osmotic disruption. Osmotic BBB disruption was attained by using intra-arterial infusion of hypertonic mannitol in Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats. To measure the changes in cerebrovascular permeability, perfusate containing [ 14C]-sucrose was infused intra-arterially at different time points following osmotic stress. Cerebrovascular permeability was then measured with the in situ brain perfusion technique. This is the first in vivo study demonstrating that osmotic disruption is prolonged by the Na +/Ca ++ exchange blocker, which did not affect the peak level of BBB disruption. The exact time course of cerebrovascular reversibility was studied and the earliest BBB disruption was seen to occur 5 min after osmotic stress. Histopathological examination after osmotic disruption with the Na +/Ca ++ exchange blocker showed no neuronal damage in rat brains. Our findings represent important experimental information regarding pharmacological manipulation of BBB disruption. The possibility of prolonging the transient opening of the BBB has major clinical implications.

Room D, 10/16/2000 9: 00 AM - 11: 00 AM (PS) Loss of Heart Rate Variability in Patients Undergoing Osmotic Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption (BBBD)

Room D, 10/16/2000 9: 00 AM - 11: 00 AM (PS) Loss of Heart Rate Variability in Patients Undergoing Osmotic Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption (BBBD)

Unexpected neurotoxicity of etoposide phosphate administered in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents after blood-brain barrier modification to enhance delivery, using propofol for general anesthesia, in a rat model.

Osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption (BBBD) increases brain and brain tumor delivery of chemotherapeutic agents, which results in increased efficacy against brain tumors. We previously noted that the use of propofol anesthesia for BBBD increased the percentage of successful disruptions, resulting in delivery of increased amounts of chemotherapeutic drugs. This study evaluated the neurotoxicity of combination chemotherapeutic administration with this enhanced delivery system. Osmotic BBBD was performed in Long-Evans rats with isoflurane (n = 11) or propofol (n = 90) anesthesia. Carboplatin and/or melphalan, methotrexate, or etoposide phosphate was administered intra-arterially (IA) after BBBD using propofol anesthesia. Animals were assessed for systemic and neurological toxicity. Animals were killed for neuropathological evaluation 30 days after treatment. With propofol or isoflurane anesthesia, BBBD alone produced no systemic or neurological toxicity. Single agents were relatively non-neurotoxic when administered IA with BBBD, as were the combinations of carboplatin or melphalan with methotrexate. Etoposide phosphate in combination with any other agent was observed to be highly neurotoxic if both agents were administered after BBBD. Administration of etoposide phosphate before BBBD completely eliminated neurotoxicity, although acute pulmonary toxicity occurred with any combination of etoposide phosphate and methotrexate, regardless of the timing of administration. Neurotoxicity was significantly increased for etoposide phosphate combination groups, particularly when both drugs were administered IA after BBBD. This increase in neurotoxicity may reflect on increase in drug delivery observed with propofol anesthesia. The neurotoxicity of IA administered etoposide phosphate with BBBD and propofol anesthesia could be minimized by administering etoposide phosphate IA before BBBD and administering carboplatin or melphalan IA after BBBD.

Pharmacokinetics of methotrexate in cerebrospinal fluid and serum after osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption in patients with brain lymphoma.

To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of methotrexate in ventricular cerebrospinal fluid and serum after osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption and intra-arterial administration compared with intravenous or simple intra-arterial infusion in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma. Serum and ventricular cerebrospinal fluid were sampled after methotrexate administration in 12 patients. Blood-brain barrier disruption was induced on 2 sequential days by mannitol (25%) infusion delivered to the vertebral or internal carotid artery territories followed by intra-arterial methotrexate (dose, 1.4 g/m2; 47 treatments). Sixteen treatments were given without barrier disruption by intravenous (3.5 g/m2; nine treatments) or intra-arterial (2.8 g/m2; seven treatments) infusion. Ventricular cerebrospinal fluid-methotrexate peak levels after blood-brain barrier disruption of the vertebral and the internal carotid arteries territories were 19.3 +/- 2.9 and 8.5 +/- 0.7 micromol/L (P < .001), and the area under the curve from time 0 to infinity was 178.0 +/- 21.3 and 110.0 +/- 12.4 [micromol/L x h, respectively (P < .01). No significant differences were observed in serum levels. After intra-arterial infusion was performed without disruption, the serum peak level was higher than that achieved by intravenous treatment (518.2 +/- 67.7 versus 180.6 +/- 31.8 micromol/L; P < .001). No differences were observed in cerebrospinal fluid concentrations, which dropped below 1 micromol/L at 6 hours. The cerebrospinal fluid/serum ratio [AUC(%)] of methotrexate after blood-brain barrier disruption was three to four times greater than that by systemic administration. Enhanced methotrexate delivery to the central nervous system can be attained by intra-arterial administration combined with osmotic disruption of the blood-brain barrier compared with simple intra-arterial or intravenous administration.

In vivo assessment of the window of barrier opening after osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption in humans.

Osmotic blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption induced by intraarterial infusion of mannitol is used in conjunction with chemotherapy to treat human brain tumors. The time course to barrier closure, or the so-called therapeutic window, has been examined in animals but little information is available in humans. The authors, therefore assessed the time course to barrier closure after osmotic BBB disruption in humans. Disruption of the BBB was demonstrated using 99mTc-glucoheptonate (TcGH) single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) scanning in 12 patients who were treated monthly with combination chemotherapy in conjunction with BBB disruption. The primary diagnosis was primary central nervous system lymphoma in seven patients and primitive neuroectodermal tumors in five. The TcGH (20 mCi) was injected at 1- to 480-minute intervals after osmotic BBB disruption, and patients underwent SPECT scanning after 4 hours. A total of 38 studies was performed. Good-to-excellent BBB disruption was obtained in 29 procedures and poor-to-moderate disruption was seen in the other nine studies. The TcGH indices correlated with the degree of BBB disruption as measured postprocedure on contrast-enhanced CT scans (r = 0.852). Mean baseline TcGH indices were 1.02+/-0.07. For the group of patients with good-to-excellent disruptions the mean indices at 1 minute postdisruption measured 2.19+/-0.18. After 40 minutes no significant change was noted (mean index 2.13+/-0.2). Then the indices declined more steeply and at 120 minutes after the disruption the index was 1.36+/-0.02. A very slow decline was noted between 120 and 240 minutes after mannitol infusion. At 240 minutes the barrier was still open for all good-to-excellent disruptions (index 1.33+/-0.08) but at 480 minutes the mean indices had returned to the baseline level. Results of these in vivo human studies indicate that the time course to closure of the disrupted BBB for low-molecular-weight complexes is longer than previously estimated. The barrier is widely open during the first 40 minutes after osmotic BBB disruption and returns to baseline levels only after 6 to 8 hours following the induction of good or excellent disruption. These findings have important clinical implications for the design of therapeutic protocols.

Enhanced delivery improves the efficacy of a tumor-specific doxorubicin immunoconjugate in a human brain tumor xenograft model.

To evaluate dose intensification with osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption (BBBD) and the potential use of drug targeting with monoclonal antibody (MAb) BR96 conjugated to doxorubicin (BR96-DOX, now called SGN15) for treatment of intracerebral and subcutaneous human LX-1 small cell lung carcinoma xenografts in rats. LX-1 tumors with high, low, or heterogeneous levels of the Lewis(y) antigen for BR96 were evaluated. Rats were treated with intracarotid or intravenous BR96-DOX, with or without osmotic BBBD. Both BR96-DOX and MAb BR96 treatment resulted in significant regression of subcutaneous tumors, in contrast to control groups including doxorubicin alone, saline, or nonbinding doxorubicin immunoconjugate. BR96-DOX delivered with BBBD to brain tumors with low antigen expression resulted in significantly (P < 0.001) increased rat survival time compared with animals that received intravenous or intra-arterial BR96-DOX. The combination of an effective drug such as doxorubicin with a MAb to facilitate tumor-selective localization and osmotic BBBD to increase tumor delivery may have practical application in the clinic, because an increased delivery of drug to tumor can be obtained without increasing the dose of systemic drug.

The influence of anesthetic choice, PaCO2, and other factors on osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption in rats with brain tumor xenografts.

Increasing the delivery of therapeutic drugs to the brain improves outcome for patients with brain tumors. Osmotic opening of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) can markedly increase drug delivery, but achieving consistent, good quality BBB disruption (BBBD) is essential. We evaluated four experiments compared with our standard isoflurane/O2 protocol to improve the quality and consistency of BBBD and drug delivery to brain tumor and normal brain in a rat model. Success of BBBD was assessed qualitatively with the large molecular weight marker Evans blue albumin and quantitatively by measuring delivery of the low molecular weight marker [3H]-methotrexate. With isoflurane/O2 anesthesia, the effects of two BBBD drugs of different osmolalities were evaluated at two different infusion rates and infusion durations. Arabinose was superior to saline (P = 0.006) in obtaining consistent Evans blue staining in 16 of 24 animals, and it significantly increased [3H]-methotrexate delivery compared with saline in the tumor (0.388 +/- 0.03 vs 0.135 +/-0.04; P = 0.0001), brain around the tumor (0.269 +/- 0.03 vs 0.035 +/- 0.03; P = 0.0001), brain distant to the tumor (0.445 +/- 0.05 vs 0.034 +/- 0.07; P = 0.001), and opposite hemisphere (0.024 +/- 0.00 vs 0.016 +/- 0.00; P = 0.0452). Forty seconds was better than 30 s (P = 0.0372) for drug delivery to the tumor. Under isoflurane/O2 anesthesia (n = 30), maintaining hypocarbia was better than hypercarbia (P = 0.025) for attaining good BBBD. A propofol/ N2O regimen was compared with the isoflurane/O2 regimen, altering blood pressure, heart rate, and PaCO2 as covariates (n = 48). Propofol/N2O was superior to isoflurane/O2 by both qualitative and quantitative measures (P < 0.0001). Neurotoxicity and neuropathology with the propofol/N2O regimen was evaluated, and none was found. These data support the use of propofol/N2O along with maintaining hypocarbia to optimize BBBD in animals with tumors. Propofol/N2O anesthesia may be better than isoflurane/O2 for optimizing osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption for delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs to brain tumor and normal brain.

The Influence of Anesthetic Choice, PaCO2, and Other Factors on Osmotic Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption in Rats with Brain Tumor Xenografts

Increasing the delivery of therapeutic drugs to the brain improves outcome for patients with brain tumors.Osmotic opening of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) can markedly increase drug delivery, but achieving consistent, good quality BBB disruption (BBBD) is essential. We evaluated four experiments compared with our standard isoflurane/O (2) protocol to improve the quality and consistency of BBBD and drug delivery to brain tumor and normal brain in a rat model. Success of BBBD was assessed qualitatively with the large molecular weight marker Evans blue albumin and quantitatively by measuring delivery of the low molecular weight marker [(3) H]-methotrexate. With isoflurane/O (2) anesthesia, the effects of two BBBD drugs of different osmolalities were evaluated at two different infusion rates and infusion durations. Arabinose was superior to saline (P = 0.006) in obtaining consistent Evans blue staining in 16 of 24 animals, and it significantly increased [(3) H]-methotrexate delivery compared with saline in the tumor (0.388 +/- 0.03 vs 0.135 +/- 0.04; P = 0.0001), brain around the tumor (0.269 +/- 0.03 vs 0.035 +/- 0.03; P = 0.0001), brain distant to the tumor (0.445 +/- 0.05 vs 0.034 +/- 0.07; P = 0.001), and opposite hemisphere (0.024 +/- 0.00 vs 0.016 +/- 0.00; P = 0.0452). Forty seconds was better than 30 s (P = 0.0372) for drug delivery to the tumor. Under isoflurane/O2 anesthesia (n = 30), maintaining hypocarbia was better than hypercarbia (P = 0.025) for attaining good BBBD. A propofol/N (2) O regimen was compared with the isoflurane/O2 regimen, altering blood pressure, heart rate, and PaCO2 as covariates (n = 48). Propofol/N2 O was superior to isoflurane/O2 by both qualitative and quantitative measures (P < 0.0001). Neurotoxicity and neuropathology with the propofol/N2 O regimen was evaluated, and none was found. These data support the use of propofol/N2 O along with maintaining hypocarbia to optimize BBBD in animals with tumors. Implications: Propofol/N2 O anesthesia may be better than isoflurane/O2 for optimizing osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption for delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs to brain tumor and normal brain. (Anesth Analg 1999;88:559-67)

Effect of hyperosmotic solutions on human brain tumour vasculature.

Reversible opening of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) has been used to increase delivery of chemotherapeutic agents into brain tumours, but it is complicated and requires general anaesthesia. Without affecting the normal BBB, and avoiding the complications of BBB modification by hyperosmotic solution, we tried an adequate minimal BBB disruption in brain tumours. Although the effect of BBB disruption on normal brain has been described, there are no reports of the effect of an impaired BBB on microcirculation. In this study, four patients underwent surgical resection of a glioblastoma multiforme (GM; n = 1), astrocytoma (n = 2), or metastatic brain tumour (n = 1). Epicerebral microcirculation was observed in the operative field. Serial fluorescein microangiograms of the tumour and peritumoural area were obtained before and after BBB disruption was introduced intra-operatively by retrograde infusion of mannitol introducing a catheter via the temporal superficial artery back to the carotid bifurcation. On the initial microangiogram, staining by the fluorescein dye was observed in the GM and metastatic tumour but not in the astrocytoma; no extravasation of fluorescein dye was observed in the peritumoural areas. After BBB disruption, fluorescein perfusion increased and extravasation of fluorescein dye from the venules was observed in the GM and the metastatic tumour and in the peritumoural area of both lesions; BBB disruption started from venules in the peritumoural area without affecting the normal brain. However, such effects were not observed in the astrocytomas after BBB disruption nor in normal brain tissue in any patient. It appears that the integrity of the BBB is less stable in the peritumoural area of GM and metastatic brain tumours than it is in astrocytomas or normal brain. Osmotic BBB disruption may offer a method for achieving global delivery of therapeutic agents to brain tumours and peritumoural areas.

Luciferase: a sensitive and quantitative probe for blood-brain barrier disruption

A novel method for quantitative analysis of blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption is described, using luciferase as a probe in a murine model system. Purified luciferase was delivered to mouse brain by osmotic BBB disruption with hypertonic mannitol; control animals received an intracarotid inoculation of saline prior to infusion of luciferase. Delivery of luciferase to brain tissue was then assessed by enzyme assay of tissue extracts, and by immunohistochemical staining. Luciferase activity in the brain of mannitol-treated animals was found to be significantly elevated (approx. sevenfold), when compared to activity in control (saline-treated) mice. This finding was confirmed by quantitative immunohistochemical staining of tissue sections, using a luciferase-specific antibody. These studies showed that there was an eight-fold elevation in the level of extravascular luciferase particles within the brain of mannitol-treated animals, as compared to controls. Taken together these data show that purified recombinant luciferase can be used as a sensitive probe, with which to study the integrity of the BBB.

Outwitting the blood-brain barrier for therapeutic purposes: osmotic opening and other means.

This article reviews historical aspects of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and recent advances in mechanisms to deliver therapeutic agents across the BBB for the treatment of intracerebral tumors and other neurological diseases. The development of the osmotic BBB disruption procedure as a clinically useful technique is described. Osmotic BBB disruption is contrasted with alternative methods for opening or bypassing the BBB, including pharmacological modification of the BBB with bradykinin and direct intracerebral infusion. Laboratory studies have played a fundamental role in advancing our understanding of the BBB and delivery of agents to brain. Preclinical animal studies will continue to serve an integral function in our efforts to improve the diagnosis and treatment of a number of neurological disorders. Techniques involving the modification of the BBB and/or blood-tumor barrier to increase delivery of therapeutic agents have been advanced to clinical trials in patients with brain tumors with very favorable results. Improving delivery of agents to the brain will play a major role in the therapeutic outcome of brain neoplasms. As techniques for gene therapy are advanced, manipulation of the BBB also may be important in the treatment of central nervous system genetic disorders.

Delivery of herpesvirus and adenovirus to nude rat intracerebral tumors after osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption.

The delivery of viral vectors to the brain for treatment of intracerebral tumors is most commonly accomplished by stereotaxic inoculation directly into the tumor. However, the small volume of distribution by inoculation may limit the efficacy of viral therapy of large or disseminated tumors. We have investigated mechanisms to increase vector delivery to intracerebral xenografts of human LX-1 small-cell lung carcinoma tumors in the nude rat. The distribution of Escherichia coli lacZ transgene expression from primary viral infection was assessed after delivery of recombinant virus by intratumor inoculation or intracarotid infusion with or without osmotic disruption of the blood-brain barrier (BBB). These studies used replication-compromised herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV; vector RH105) and replication-defective adenovirus (AdRSVlacZ), which represent two of the most commonly proposed viral vectors for tumor therapy. Transvascular delivery of both viruses to intracerebral tumor was demonstrated when administered intraarterially (i.a.) after osmotic BBB disruption (n = 9 for adenovirus; n = 7 for HSV), while no virus infection was apparent after i.a. administration without BBB modification (n = 8 for adenovirus; n = 4 for HSV). The thymidine kinase-negative HSV vector infected clumps of tumor cells as a result of its ability to replicate selectively in dividing cells. Osmotic BBB disruption in combination with i.a. administration of viral vectors may offer a method of global delivery to treat disseminated brain tumors.