You have accessJournal of UrologyKidney Cancer: Basic Research & Pathophysiology III1 Apr 2016MP92-19 EXPERIMENTAL IMAGING IN ORTHOTOPIC XENOGRAFT MODELS OF RENAL CELL CARCINOMA: COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF HIGH-RESOLUTION ULTRASONOGRAPHY, IN-VIVO MICRO-CT AND 9.4T MRI Johannes Linxweiler, Christina Körbel, Andreas Müller, Volker Jung, Eva Jüngel, Stefan Siemer, Michael Stöckle, Kerstin Junker, Michael D. Menger, and Matthias Saar Johannes LinxweilerJohannes Linxweiler More articles by this author , Christina KörbelChristina Körbel More articles by this author , Andreas MüllerAndreas Müller More articles by this author , Volker JungVolker Jung More articles by this author , Eva JüngelEva Jüngel More articles by this author , Stefan SiemerStefan Siemer More articles by this author , Michael StöckleMichael Stöckle More articles by this author , Kerstin JunkerKerstin Junker More articles by this author , Michael D. MengerMichael D. Menger More articles by this author , and Matthias SaarMatthias Saar More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.2652AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Orthotopic xenografts are increasingly used preclinical in-vivo models for the study of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, monitoring of these tumors requires sophisticated imaging techniques. Herein we comparatively evaluated modern small animal imaging tools like high-resolution 3D-ultrasonography (3D-US), contrast-enhanced in-vivo micro-CT (CE-CT) and 9,4T MRI (MRI) to monitor tumor growth in an orthotopic RCC xenograft model. METHODS 106 CAKI-1 cells were injected under the renal capsule of 18 Balb/c-nude mice. Every 14 days from week 4 imaging was performed by CE-CT and 3D-US. 10 weeks after cell inoculation, all animals additionally underwent MRI. At autopsy, tumor volumes were determined with a caliper and compared to in-vivo imaging results. CE-CT, MRI and 3D-US were evaluated regarding tumor detection, tumor volume analysis, radiographic imaging properties and examination time. Finally, RCC cell lines KTCTL30 (n=2) and 786-0 (n=1) were used to test their applicability for the orthotopic xenograft model. RESULTS In 16/18 animals (take rate 89%) all methods enabled to adequately visualize orthotopic tumors and to display their growth over time. While the tumors had a homogenously radiolucent signal in CE-CT, 3D-US and MRI could better visualize intratumoral structures and surrounding soft tissue. CT had the best spatial resolution, followed by 3D-US and MRI. Median examination time was 4.8min per 3D-US, 12.5min per CT and 37.9min per MRI, respectively. Of interest, tumor volumes determined by CE-CT and 3D-US showed strong correlation with each other (n=85, R=0.985) as well as with caliper measurements at autopsy (CT: n=16. R=0.922; 3D-US: n=16, R=0.934). Similarly, tumor volumes measured with T2w MRI correlated well with those determined by CT, 3D-US and caliper. No side effects due to radiation exposure were seen. Mice inoculated with KTCTL30 cells developed partly cystic, partly solid tumors. 786-O cells yielded purely solid, fast growing tumors. CONCLUSIONS All three imaging modalities are feasible tools for a non-invasive monitoring of orthotopic tumor growth and show excellent correlation with each other. While 3D-US allows for a fast analysis of tumor volume with excellent resolution, MRI provides the best soft tissue contrast and can give additional information about tumor biology (e.g. diffusion, perfusion). CT has the best spatial resolution and enables simultaneous screening for bone and lung metastases but relies on the use of contrast agent and ionizing radiation. © 2016FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 195Issue 4SApril 2016Page: e1169 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2016MetricsAuthor Information Johannes Linxweiler More articles by this author Christina Körbel More articles by this author Andreas Müller More articles by this author Volker Jung More articles by this author Eva Jüngel More articles by this author Stefan Siemer More articles by this author Michael Stöckle More articles by this author Kerstin Junker More articles by this author Michael D. Menger More articles by this author Matthias Saar More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract