BackgroundIn vitro, animal, and clinical comparative studies have revealed that combinations of rifampicin with antibacterial agents are effective in the treatment of biofilm-associated infections. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of rifampicin combination therapies compared with monotherapies without rifampicin in patients with orthopedic implant-related infections. Materials and MethodsThe clinical literature was comprehensively searched for studies assessing the effectiveness of rifampicin combination therapy in patients with orthopedic implant-related infection. Identified studies were screened based on the PRISMA flow diagram. The primary outcome was the cure rate and the secondary outcome was the incidence of adverse events. Subgroup analyses were performed based on causative organisms, antibacterial agents, and types of surgical intervention. ResultsTwenty-seven studies were identified, including two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 25 cohort studies. Rifampicin combinations were associated with significantly higher cure rates than monotherapies in cohort studies, but not in RCTs. Subgroup analyses showed that rifampicin combinations were effective in patients infected with Cutibacterium and Staphylococcus spp.; in patients who underwent debridement, antibiotics, implant retention (DAIR) procedures; and in patients with one-stage revision. Moreover, combinations of rifampicin and fluoroqinolones were more effective than fluoroquinolones alone, while combinating rifampicin with other antibacterial agents showed no significant benefit. Combination treatment did not significantly affect adverse events in either RCTs or observational studies. Risk of bias assessment and summary of findings showed that the certainty of evidence for both RCTs and observational studies was very low. ConclusionThis systematic review and meta-analysis confirmed the potential effectiveness of rifampicin combination therapy for the cure of orthopedic implant-related infection in some circumstances, although the certainty and quality of evidence were very low.
Read full abstract