Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Research Articles

Development of an Orthopedic Surgery Anatomy Curricular Model for Fourth Year Medical Students Using a Modified Delphi Method

The purpose of this study was to develop anatomy-focused learning outcomes that can be used to design a fourth-year elective for students matriculating into orthopedic surgery residencies. A series of proposed learning outcomes (N=72) was developed using the ACGME Orthopedic Milestones 2.0 as a framework. In 2021, these were converted into a survey asking participants to rate the importance of each outcome on a 5-point Likert scale. The modified Delphi Method was used to refine the list of outcomes until group consensus was achieved. The consensus was defined using a conservative 3-tier approach. Eighteen academic centers with an associated orthopedic surgery residency. Twenty-six orthopedic surgeons (ranging from 1 to 42 years in practice). Of the 72 learning outcomes from the first-round survey, 25 met consensus criteria. Of the 62 learning outcomes from the second-round survey, 45 met consensus criteria. All learning outcomes that met consensus criteria after the second-round survey were stratified into low-yield (n = 8), intermediate-yield (n = 34), and high-yield (n = 28) categories. Using a modified Delphi Method, this study elicited feedback from experts in the field of orthopedic surgery to develop a framework for a fourth-year elective focused on anatomical concepts important for students applying to residencies in orthopedic surgery. The product of this process affords a great deal of flexibility when utilizing the results of this study in institution-specific curricular development.

Unveiling the Economic Toll of Surgical Learning Curve in Elderly Hip Fractures.

Can the financial impact of implant choice during the learning curve of inexperienced surgeons in hip fracture surgery be quantified? Hip fractures in the elderly are a significant medical concern, often requiring surgical interventions performed by orthopedic surgery residents. As healthcare costs rise, exploring cost reduction opportunities within the healthcare system becomes crucial. In this prospective analysis, we examined the financial implications of implant choices encountered by residents during their learning curve in hip fracture surgery. Our study included 278 surgically treated pertrochanteric fractures using the same locking cephalomedullary nail. Data on patients, surgeons (including their experience and seniority), and all implants charged by the hospital were collected. This encompassed documentation of any nail-related equipment that was opened on the operating table and whether it was subsequently used by the end of the procedure. By calculating the number and cost of these implants, we assessed the financial burden associated with suboptimal choices made during the learning curve. Our findings revealed that in 16.18% of surgeries, instances of suboptimal implant utilization occurred, highlighting the complexities of the learning process. Importantly, the rate of these challenges was not influenced by surgeon seniority or patient characteristics. The mean additional cost per surgery was determined to be USD 65.69 ± 157.63 for surgeries with suboptimal implant utilization, compared to USD 56.55 ± 139.13 for surgeries without such challenges. Although there was a trend towards higher implant-related costs in resident-led surgeries, the difference did not reach statistical significance. These findings underscore the feasibility of enabling residents to autonomously perform intramedullary nailing surgeries, even without specialist supervision, while incurring minimal additional expenses during the learning curve. By acknowledging the financial implications associated with the learning curve in the management of hip fractures, we can strive to optimize healthcare costs, thus addressing an important aspect of this issue.

Technology-Assisted Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Orthopaedic Residency Training: A National Survey.

The adoption of technology-assisted total joint arthroplasty (TA-TJA) is increasing; however, the extent to which TA-TJA is used among orthopaedic trainees is unknown. The purpose of this study was to assess the current use of TA total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) by orthopaedic residents and to evaluate resident perceptions toward TA-TJA in their surgical training. In this cross-sectional study, an anonymous electronic survey was sent to all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited orthopaedic surgery residency program coordinators to distribute to their PGY-2 to PGY-5 residents. The survey consisted of 24 questions, including resident demographics, utilization of TA-TJA in their training, and perceptions regarding TA-TJA. A total of 103 orthopaedic residents completed the survey, of whom 68.0% reported using TA-TJA at their institution. Of the residents using TA-TJA, 28.6% used TA for total TKA only, 71.4% used TA for both TKA and THA, and none used TA solely for THA. One-third of residents (33.3%) use TA for more than half of all TKAs conducted, whereas 57.0% use TA for <10% of all THAs conducted. Approximately half of all residents (49.5%) thought that training in TA-TJA should be required during residency, with no significant differences between junior and senior level residents ( P = 0.24). Most (82.0%) thought that trainees should be required to learn conventional TJA before learning TA-TJA. 63.0% thought that technology had a positive effect on their primary TJA training experience; however, 26.0% reported concern that their training conducting conventional TJA may be inadequate. This study demonstrates that most orthopaedic residents currently conduct TA-TJA and highlights notable differences in TJA training experiences. These results provide a platform for future work aimed at further optimizing TJA training in residency, particularly as technology continues to rapidly evolve and utilization of TA-TJA is projected to grow exponentially. N/A, survey-based study.

Decoding the Signals: An Analysis of Preference Signaling in the 2023 Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Match.

While previously used in other specialties, the preference signaling program (PSP) was implemented in the 2022 to 2023 orthopaedic surgery residency application process for the first time. The PSP allowed for 30 signaling tokens to be sent by applicants to programs of their choice to indicate particular interest in a program. It remains unknown how the PSP affects applicants and programs in the orthopaedic surgery residency match. Thus, this study's purpose was to assess the utility of preference signaling within the orthopaedic surgery residency application process in its inaugural year of use. An anonymous electronic survey was emailed to all orthopaedic surgery residency applicants who applied to the authors' institution during the 2022 to 2023 application cycle. The survey was sent after match lists were submitted and closed before the release of match results. The survey collected information regarding applicant demographics, preference signaling habits, and attitude toward preference signaling. The survey was completed by 101 applicants. Applicants applied to a mean of 90 programs (range: 10-197) and received an average of 12 interview invitations (range: 0-39). Applicants almost uniformly used all 30 signals, with nearly two-thirds signaling their home programs (65%, 49/76), and nearly all applicants sending signals to programs at which they performed away rotations (95.7%, 88/92). Applicants received a mean of 9 invitations from programs they signaled, compared with 2 invitations from programs they did not signal. Applicants were significantly more likely to receive an interview invite at a program they signaled than one they did not (p < 0.01). Overall, 57% of applicants (57/101) found the PSP to be helpful, whereas 28% (28/101) found it to be unhelpful, and 16% (16/101) had a neutral opinion. This study reports that the PSP in the 2022 to 2023 orthopaedic surgery match was an effective method of expressing interest in a program because applicants were significantly more likely to receive interview invites to signaled programs. More than half of respondents felt PSP to be helpful; however, the effect on application numbers is still unclear. III.

Assessing Gender Differences in Technical Skills and Confidence in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Applicants.

Variations in confidence for procedural skills have been demonstrated when comparing male and female medical students in surgical training. This study investigates whether differences in technical skill and self-reported confidence exist between male and female medical students applying to orthopaedic residency. All medical students (2017 to 2020) invited to interview at a single orthopaedic residency program were prospectively evaluated on their technical skills and self-reported confidence. Objective evaluation of technical skill included scores for a suturing task as evaluated by faculty graders. Self-reported confidence in technical skills was assessed before and after completing the assigned task. Scores for male and female students were compared by age, self-identified race/ethnicity, number of publications at the time of application, athletic background, and US Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 score. Two hundred sixteen medical students were interviewed, of which 73% were male (n = 158). No gender differences were observed in suture task technical skill scores or mean difference in simultaneous visual task scores. The mean change from pre-task and post-task self-reported confidence scores was similar between sexes. Although female students trended toward lower post-task self-reported confidence scores compared with male students, this did not achieve statistical significance. Lower self-reported confidence was associated with a higher US Medical Licensing Examination score and with attending a private medical school. No difference in technical skill or confidence was found between male and female applicants to a single orthopaedic surgery residency program. Female applicants trended toward self-reporting lower confidence than male applicants in post-task evaluations. Differences in confidence have been shown previously in surgical trainees, which may suggest that differences in skill and confidence may develop during residency training.

Health Literacy Awareness Among Orthopaedic Surgery Residents: A COERG Survey.

This study was endorsed by the Collaborative Orthopaedic Education Research Group board. A 17-item questionnaire was administered anonymously to orthopaedic residents through a secure online platform in the 2020 to 2021 academic year. All participation was voluntary. One hundred ninety-two residents (42%) from 19 orthopaedic programs completed the survey. Most residents felt "somewhat comfortable" with issues related to HL. Most residents reported no specific training in HL issues during residency (77.5%). Of the 43 residents (22.3%) who did receive formal training, most of these individuals felt that the training is effective (N = 42, 97.7%). Role playing/standardized patient encounters were reported as the most effective form of HL training. Residents felt it was somewhat important to receive formal HL training in residency (median = 4.0, interquartile range = 3.0-5.0), and there was a modest desire for formalized training (39%). This study is the first to characterize orthopaedic resident perceptions of HL issues in practice and training. Residents were somewhat confident in their understanding of HL concepts, and those who received formal training felt it was effective. However, there remains a low rate of formal orthopaedic resident training in HL issues, which may be an area for improvement in orthopaedic training paradigms.

Effect of a surgical skills month on intern performance in the orthopaedic in-training examination

Background: The orthopaedic in-training examination (OITE) is an annual national assessment of knowledge in orthopaedic surgery residents. Our primary aim was to determine if intern performance in the OITE (measured by correct answers) differed before and after the adoption of a formal surgical skills month (SSM) in the residency curriculum. A secondary aim was to evaluate the relationship between intern OITE and post-graduate year two (PGY-2) scores. Methods: A single institution retrospective cohort study was performed, comparing orthopaedic surgery interns who took the OITE before (15 residents) and after (16 residents) the year 2013 (when an SSM was introduced). De-identified OITE raw and percentage correct scores were obtained from all resident records. Statistical testing included independent sample t test and linear regression, with a significance level of 0.05. Results: Comparison of OITE percentage of correct answers overall, between interns before and after 2013, showed a significant increase after initiating the SSM (44.8%±4.13% vs. 49.9%±8.44%, P=0.0414). In addition, regression analysis demonstrated a positive linear relationship between intern and PGY-2 OITE scores after the SSM was implemented (R 2=0.380, P=0.011, β=0.424, CI: 0.1135341 –1.190913). Conclusion: Implementation of an SSM led to increased intern OITE scores. Moreover, intern OITE scores were more predictive of PGY-2 scores after SSM implementation. Earlier education (such as a surgical skills month) for orthopaedic surgery interns can aid knowledge acquisition and career development at the beginning of their training. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Diversity-Related Positions in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Programs.

The Association of American Medical Colleges and the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons have incorporated diversity and inclusion as one of their primary goals. Orthopaedic surgery remains the least diverse medical specialty when measured for practicing physicians and trainees. The purpose of this study was to determine the number and distinct types of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) positions within orthopaedic surgery residency programs in the United States. The Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database was used to obtain a list of all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited orthopaedic surgery residency programs. The following was collected from 193 residency program websites between June 6, 2022, and June 26, 2022: program location, university or community based, allopathic or osteopathic recognition, number of faculty in the orthopaedic department, number of residents per year, diversity-related statements, and diversity-focused faculty positions. Of the 193 programs evaluated, 74 (38.9%) included DEI statements on their website while only 42 (21.8%) had at least one DEI-specific faculty role (e.g., diversity committee, diversity liaison, vice chair for DEI). For 16 (8.3%) programs, the faculty role was nonspecific to the orthopaedic residency program. Nonspecific roles were primarily created by the affiliated school of medicine, but in 4 (2.1%) outlier cases, faculty members assumed DEI roles through a medical center, a graduate medical education program, or a department of surgery. Less than half of orthopaedic surgery residency programs currently advocate for DEI on their associated websites while fewer than 25% have a DEI faculty position. Previous studies have called for a greater number of DEI positions and committees among orthopaedic residencies because of the lower admittance rate of qualified Under Represented in Medicine (URiM) applicants. A role dedicated to DEI may increase the number of women and URiM applicants pursuing a career in orthopaedic surgery.

Match Rates Among Underrepresented Minority and Female Applicants to Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Programs from 2011 to 2021: How Are We Doing?

Orthopaedic surgery residency programs have traditionally had less representation of underrepresented minority (URM) and female trainees compared with other medical specialties. Widespread efforts have been implemented to increase the diversity of orthopaedic surgery residency programs; however, it is not known whether URM and female applicants are increasingly likely to match as a result. Thus, we aimed to study the independent association between URM and female applicants and matching into orthopaedic surgery over the past decade. Applicant-level data from the Electronic Residency Application Service were reviewed from 2011 to 2021 with variables including demographic variables, URM status, and matriculation to an orthopaedic surgery residency program. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the likelihood of matriculating into orthopaedic surgery when controlling for number of applications, top 40 medical school status, AOA status, and MD/other degree. Twelve thousand one hundred eleven applicants were identified from 2011 to 2021 with a match rate of 70% overall. Two thousand fifty-six applicants (17%) were female and 1,926 (16%) classified as URM. The total number of applications increased from 1,074 in 2011 to 1,229 in 2021. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) associated with matching among all applicants decreased from 0.75 in 2011 to 0.64 in 2021, p < 0.001, and the OR of non-URM male and female applicants also decreased (female: 0.79-0.69, p < 0.001; male: 0.78-0.65, p < 0.001). The OR of URM male applicants did not change significantly (0.57-0.55, p = 0.60). The OR for URM female applicants, however, increased significantly from 0.46 to 0.61, p < 0.001. Over the entire time frame, the odds of matching were significantly lower for URM applicants compared with non-URM applicants (both male and female). Overall, the adjusted odds ratio of matching into orthopaedic surgery among female URM applicants has increased over the past decade, indicating successful efforts to improve the diversity of orthopaedic surgery training programs. The odds of URM male applicants have remained relatively constant, and the odds of URM male and female applicants were significantly lower than all non-URM applicants. III.

Evaluating ChatGPT Performance on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination.

Artificial intelligence (AI) holds potential in improving medical education and healthcare delivery. ChatGPT is a state-of-the-art natural language processing AI model which has shown impressive capabilities, scoring in the top percentiles on numerous standardized examinations, including the Uniform Bar Exam and Scholastic Aptitude Test. The goal of this study was to evaluate ChatGPT performance on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE), an assessment of medical knowledge for orthopedic residents. OITE 2020, 2021, and 2022 questions without images were inputted into ChatGPT version 3.5 and version 4 (GPT-4) with zero prompting. The performance of ChatGPT was evaluated as a percentage of correct responses and compared with the national average of orthopedic surgery residents at each postgraduate year (PGY) level. ChatGPT was asked to provide a source for its answer, which was categorized as being a journal article, book, or website, and if the source could be verified. Impact factor for the journal cited was also recorded. ChatGPT answered 196 of 360 answers correctly (54.3%), corresponding to a PGY-1 level. ChatGPT cited a verifiable source in 47.2% of questions, with an average median journal impact factor of 5.4. GPT-4 answered 265 of 360 questions correctly (73.6%), corresponding to the average performance of a PGY-5 and exceeding the corresponding passing score for the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part I Examination of 67%. GPT-4 cited a verifiable source in 87.9% of questions, with an average median journal impact factor of 5.2. ChatGPT performed above the average PGY-1 level and GPT-4 performed better than the average PGY-5 level, showing major improvement. Further investigation is needed to determine how successive versions of ChatGPT would perform and how to optimize this technology to improve medical education. AI has the potential to aid in medical education and healthcare delivery.

Pediatric Lateral Humeral Condyle Fractures: Reliability of a Modified Jakob Classification System and its Impact on Treatment Planning With or Without Arthrography.

Various lateral humeral condyle fracture (LHCF) classification systems have been in use since the 1950s, but limited research exists on their reliability. The most widely utilized, yet un-validated system is that of Jakob and colleagues. The purpose of the current study was to analyze the reliability of a modified Jakob classification system and its value in guiding treatment either with or without arthrography. Interrater and intrarater reliability studies were performed using radiographs and arthrograms from 32 LHCFs. Radiographs were presented to 3 pediatric orthopaedic surgeons and 6 pediatric orthopaedic surgery residents who were asked to classify the fractures according to a modified Jakob classification system, enunciate their treatment plan, and whether they would utilize arthrography. Classification was repeated within 2 weeks to assess intrarater reliability. The treatment plan using radiographs only and radiographs with arthrography were compared at both rating points. The modified Jakob system had excellent interrater reliability using only radiographs with a kappa value of 0.82 and an overall agreement of 86%. The average kappa for intrarater reliability using only radiographs was 0.88 with a range of 0.79 to 1.00 and an average overall agreement of 91% with a range of 84% to 100%. Interrater and intrarater reliability was poorer using both radiographs and arthrography. On average, arthrography changed the treatment plan in 8% of cases. The modified Jakob classification system proved to be a reliable classification system for LHCFs, independent of arthrography, given the excellent free-marginal multirater kappa values. Level III-diagnostic.

Gender Disparities Among Professional Team Sports Medicine Physicians.

Although recent trends from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) present encouraging growth of female representation in sports medicine, the field is still lagging behind other specialties. This study investigates gender disparities among physicians providing care for professional sports teams in male and female sports leagues. Information regarding physicians providing sports medicine care to professional teams obtained by database queries (May 2021). Chi-square analysis compared gender data of orthopaedic team physicians with American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM) and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) membership, residency, and fellowship census data. Primary care sports medicine physicians were compared with American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM) and primary-care sports medicine fellowship census data. Professional sports health care. Professional league physicians. None. Gender, residency, and fellowship training of professional league physicians. Among a total of 608 team physicians, 572 (93.5%) were male and 40 (6.5%) were female. Orthopedic surgeons comprised 64.7% of the physicians. Fourteen (3.6%) team orthopedic surgeons were female. Thirty-five percent of team physicians were primary care sports medicine physicians. Twenty-six primary care sports medicine physicians (11.6%) were female. Orthopaedic female team physician representation overall was comparable with AOSSM and AAOS membership but significantly less than orthopaedic surgery residents and sports medicine fellows ( P < 0.01). Women's National Basketball Association orthopaedic team physicians were more represented than female membership among AOSSM, AAOS, and orthopaedic sports medicine fellows ( P < 0.01). Except for the WNBA, Premiere Hockey Federation, National Women's Soccer League, and United States Football League, female primary care sports medicine physicians were underrepresented in professional sports compared with AMSSM membership and primary care sports fellows ( P < 0.01). Overall, female representation is poor among orthopaedic surgeons and primary care physicians providing sports medicine care to professional teams. Leagues encompassing female athletes tend to have better representation of female physicians. IV.

Analysis of Academic Accomplishments and Demographics for Elected Presidents of National Orthopedic Surgery Organizations in the United States.

This study analyzed the academic accomplishments and demographics of elected presidents of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), American Orthopaedic Association (AOA), and American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS). Curriculum vitae and internet-based resources were reviewed to collect demographics, training characteristics, bibliometrics, and National Institutes of Health (NIH) research funding of contemporary presidents (1990-2020). Eighty presidents were included. Most presidents were men (97%), and 4% of presidents were non-White (3% Black and 1% Hispanic). Few had an additional graduate degree (4% MBA, 3% MS, 1% MPH, 1% PhD). Ten orthopedic surgery residency programs trained 47% of these presidents. Most had fellowship training (59%), and the top three were hand surgery (11%), pediatric orthopedics (11%), and adult reconstruction (10%). Twenty-nine presidents (36%) participated in a traveling fellowship. The mean age at appointment was 58±5 years, which was 27 years since residency graduation. The mean h-index was 36±23, resulting from 150±126 peer-reviewed manuscripts. Orthopedic surgery presidents had more peer-reviewed manuscripts (150±126) than chairs (73±81) and program directors (27±32) (P<.001). AOA presidents had the highest mean h-index (42±21) compared with AAOS (38±27) and ABOS (25±16) presidents (P=.035). Nineteen presidents had NIH funding (24%). More presidents had NIH funding in the AOA (39%) and AAOS (25%) than the ABOS (0%) (P=.007). Orthopedic surgery presidents possess high levels of scholarly output. AOA presidents had the highest h-index values and prevalence of NIH funding. Females and racial minorities remain underrepresented at the highest levels of leadership. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(1):e45-e51.].

The Value of Signaling an Orthopaedic Surgery Program: A Survey to Orthopaedic Surgery Programs.

A new system was implemented by the Association of American Medical Colleges called the preference signaling program for the 2022 to 2023 orthopaedic surgery residency match. Applicants were able to signal 30 orthopaedic surgery programs to indicate high interest in a specific program. The purpose of this study was to address how important signaling was to an orthopaedic surgery program this 2022 to 2023 application cycle. A five-question survey was sent to orthopaedic surgery residency programs participating in the Electronic Residency Application Service this application cycle. Contact information was gathered through the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education residency website and program websites. Responses were obtained from 69 of the 151 programs (46%) contacted. The average number of applicants per program was 727 (range, 372 to 1031, SD 155). Thirty-four of 61 respondents (56%) stated that 100% of their interviewees signaled their program. Fifty-five of 61 respondents (90%) indicated that their interviewee pool consisted of 75% or more applicants who signaled. Applicants who signaled had a 24.4% (range, 12.77 to 47.41, SD 8.04) chance of receiving an interview. Applicants who did not signal had just a 0.92% (range, 0 to 13.10, SD 2.08) chance of receiving an interview. Fifty-four of the 63 applicants (86%) answered that signaling played an important role in considering an applicant for an interview. Over half of the responding programs only interviewed applicants who signaled their program, and over 90% of programs' interview lists consisted of at least 75% of signaling applicants. Eighty-six percent of programs indicated that signaling played an important role in considering an applicant for an interview. Applicants who signaled were 26.5 times more likely to receive an interview than those who did not (P < 0.0001). With this information, applicants can narrow down their list of programs to apply to, knowing that their signal to a program will give them a better chance at receiving an interview.

Higher Grit Scores are Associated With Greater Scholarly Productivity Among Orthopaedic Surgery Residents

Higher Grit Scores are Associated With Greater Scholarly Productivity Among Orthopaedic Surgery Residents

Trends in Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Diversity Among Hand Surgery Fellows From 2007 to 2021

There is a paucity of research on the demographic trends of orthopedic and plastic hand surgery fellows. The purpose of this study was to ascertain the current state of racial and gender demographic trends in hand surgery fellowship from 2007 to2021. We analyzed fellowship demographic data from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education public database from 2007-2008 through 2020-2021. The gender of hand surgery fellows was categorized as male, female, or not reported and their race/ethnicity as White, Non-Hispanic; Asian or Pacific Islander, Hispanic; Black, Non-Hispanic; American Indian or Alaskan Native; other; or unknown. We extracted the number of fellows per year for each category and calculated the percentage equivalents and average percentages. We performed the chi-square test for trend (Cochran-Armitage test) to identify any significant changes in the percentages of gender and race/ethnicity between 2007 and2021. There was a significant increase in the percentage of hand surgery fellows who are women (20.7% to 30.7%) and Asian or Pacific Islander (13.3% to 25.3%). There was no significant change in the percentage of Hispanic or Black, Non-Hispanic fellows. Although there have been some increases, hand surgery fellows continue to be underrepresented by women and minorities, consistent with the demographic of orthopedic and plastic surgery residents. There have been increasing trends in the number of women and minorities in medical schools, which leaves room for improvement from the downstream prospective applicant pool. The physician-patient relationship can potentially be strengthened by race and gender concordance; however, many minority and female hand surgery patients do not have physicians who are women or of the same ethnic background. Patient satisfaction, trust, and potential health outcomes may be improved with a physician workforce that reflects the diversity of their patients.

Can Artificial Intelligence Pass the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Examination? Orthopaedic Residents Versus ChatGPT.

Advances in neural networks, deep learning, and artificial intelligence (AI) have progressed recently. Previous deep learning AI has been structured around domain-specific areas that are trained on dataset-specific areas of interest that yield high accuracy and precision. A new AI model using large language models (LLM) and nonspecific domain areas, ChatGPT (OpenAI), has gained attention. Although AI has demonstrated proficiency in managing vast amounts of data, implementation of that knowledge remains a challenge. (1) What percentage of Orthopaedic In-Training Examination questions can a generative, pretrained transformer chatbot (ChatGPT) answer correctly? (2) How does that percentage compare with results achieved by orthopaedic residents of different levels, and if scoring lower than the 10th percentile relative to 5th-year residents is likely to correspond to a failing American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery score, is this LLM likely to pass the orthopaedic surgery written boards? (3) Does increasing question taxonomy affect the LLM's ability to select the correct answer choices? This study randomly selected 400 of 3840 publicly available questions based on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination and compared the mean score with that of residents who took the test over a 5-year period. Questions with figures, diagrams, or charts were excluded, including five questions the LLM could not provide an answer for, resulting in 207 questions administered with raw score recorded. The LLM's answer results were compared with the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination ranking of orthopaedic surgery residents. Based on the findings of an earlier study, a pass-fail cutoff was set at the 10th percentile. Questions answered were then categorized based on the Buckwalter taxonomy of recall, which deals with increasingly complex levels of interpretation and application of knowledge; comparison was made of the LLM's performance across taxonomic levels and was analyzed using a chi-square test. ChatGPT selected the correct answer 47% (97 of 207) of the time, and 53% (110 of 207) of the time it answered incorrectly. Based on prior Orthopaedic In-Training Examination testing, the LLM scored in the 40th percentile for postgraduate year (PGY) 1s, the eighth percentile for PGY2s, and the first percentile for PGY3s, PGY4s, and PGY5s; based on the latter finding (and using a predefined cutoff of the 10th percentile of PGY5s as the threshold for a passing score), it seems unlikely that the LLM would pass the written board examination. The LLM's performance decreased as question taxonomy level increased (it answered 54% [54 of 101] of Tax 1 questions correctly, 51% [18 of 35] of Tax 2 questions correctly, and 34% [24 of 71] of Tax 3 questions correctly; p = 0.034). Although this general-domain LLM has a low likelihood of passing the orthopaedic surgery board examination, testing performance and knowledge are comparable to that of a first-year orthopaedic surgery resident. The LLM's ability to provide accurate answers declines with increasing question taxonomy and complexity, indicating a deficiency in implementing knowledge. Current AI appears to perform better at knowledge and interpretation-based inquires, and based on this study and other areas of opportunity, it may become an additional tool for orthopaedic learning and education.

The Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Pain (MSP) Among Orthopedic Surgeons and Residents in Saudi Arabia's Eastern Area.

Orthopedic surgery is a tiring specialty both physically and mentally. Surgeons tend to hold strenuous postures for long periods of time. Orthopedic surgery residents are affected just as much as their seniors by the difficult ergonomics. More care should be aimed toward healthcare professionals to improve patient outcomes and decrease the burden on our surgeons. The goal of this study is to pinpoint the areas of musculoskeletal pain among orthopedic surgery physicians and residents and its prevalence in the eastern province of Saudi Arabia. A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Eastern region of Saudi Arabia. A simple random selection of 103 male and female orthopedic surgery residents from Saudi Commission for Health Specialties accredited hospitals was enrolled in the study. Residents enrolled from the firstto fifthyear. Data were collected using a self-administered online questionnaire based on the musculoskeletal Nordic questionnaire activated in 2022-2023. Out of 103, a total of 83 completed the survey. The majority (49.9%) were junior residents from residency year (R) 1-R3 and exactly 52 (62.7%) residents were males. The majority of the participants, which were 35 physicians (55.6%), perfume less than six operations as average operations per week, and duration stay in the operating room (OR) per operation there were 29 physicians (46%) stay in the OR for 3-6 h. The most reported sites of pain included lower back pain (46%), followed by neck pain (39.7%) and then upper back pain (30.2%). About 27% of the participants had the pain for more than 6 months, however, only 7 (11.1%) residents seek for medical help. Considering the associated factors with MSP, smoking, and residency year were significantly associated with having musculoskeletal pain (MSP). The presence of MSK pain among R1 residents represents 89.5%, in comparison with R2 residents Who reported 63.6% and 66.7% among R5 residents. This finding indicates a decrease in MSP among residents over the 5 years of residency programs. Additionally, the majority of the participants with MSP reported being smokers 24 (88.9%), controversy, only three of the participants represent (11.1%) without MSP and smokers. Musculoskeletal pain is a serious issue that needs to be addressed. The results indicate that the most reported areas of MSP were the low back, neck, and upper back.Only a minority of the participantswent to seek medical help. Residents from R1 experienced more MSP than their seniors and this could indicate an adaptive behavior from senior staff. More research should be done on the topic of MSP in order to promote health among caregivers across the kingdom.

Update on Educational Resources and Evaluation Tools for Orthopaedic Surgery Residents.

Innovations in orthopaedic resident educational resources and evaluation tools are essential to ensuring appropriate training and ultimately the graduation of competent orthopaedic surgeons. In recent years, there have been several advancements in comprehensive educational platforms within orthopaedic surgery. Orthobullets PASS, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Clinical Classroom, and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery Resident Orthopaedic Core Knowledge each have their own unique advantages in preparation for the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination and American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery board certification examinations. In addition, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestones 2.0 and the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Knowledge Skills Behavior program each provide objective assessment of resident core competencies. Understanding and using these new platforms will help orthopaedic residents, faculty, residency programs, and program leadership to best train and evaluate their residents.

Orthopaedic surgery residents report little subjective or objective familiarity with healthcare costs.

Residents have limited education regarding the cost of orthopaedic interventions. Orthopaedic residents' knowledge was surveyed in three scenarios involving an intertrochanteric femur fracture: 1) uncomplicated course with 2-day hospital stay; 2) complicated course necessitating ICU admission; and 3) readmission for pulmonary embolism management. From 2018 to 2020, 69 orthopaedic surgery residents were surveyed. Respondents estimated hospital charges and collections; professional charges and collections; implant cost; and level of knowledge depending on the scenario. Most residents (83.6%) reported feeling "not knowledgeable". Respondents reporting "somewhat knowledgeable" did not perform better than those who reported "not knowledgeable". In the uncomplicated scenario, residents underestimated hospital charges and collections (p < 0.01; p = 0.87), and overestimated hospital charges and collections and professional collections (all p < 0.01) with an average percent error of 57.2%. Most residents (88.4%) were aware the sliding hip screw construct costs less than a cephalomedullary nail. In the complex scenario, while residents underestimated the hospital charges (p < 0.01), the estimated collections were closer to the actual figure (p = 0.16). In the third scenario, residents overestimated the charges and collections (p = 0.04; p = 0.04). Orthopaedic surgery residents receive little education regarding healthcare economics and feel unknowledgeable therefore a role for formal economic education during orthopaedic residency may exist.