Orthopaedic Residents Research Articles

To the bone: Prevalence and correlates of depression and anxiety among orthopedic residents in Mexico.

Examining orthopedic residents in Mexico, researchers explore the relationship between the presence of depressive or anxious symptoms and the degree of perfectionism, perceived work-related distress, and involvement in the care of patient(s) who died. This was a cross-sectional online survey of 642 orthopedic residents from October 2019 to April 2021. Of orthopedic residents contacted, 50.6% responded rate (70.9% male, average age 29.8 years). A total of 12.5% reported significant depressive symptoms and 18.4% reported significant anxious symptoms. On a scale from 0-100, the mean score of perceived work-related distress was 51.9. One-third (33.6%) reported being involved in the care of patient(s) who had died. Higher levels of work-related distress and higher scores on perfectionism were associated with depressive and anxiety symptoms. In particular, being involved in the care of patient(s) who had died was associated with anxious symptoms (OR = 1.79; 95%CI = 1.18-2.72). These results highlight the need for systematic monitoring of the mental health of orthopedic residents in Mexico, particularly those who report a high level of work-related distress or perfectionism or who have recently experienced the death of a patient.

AOA Critical Issues: Perceptions on the State of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Survey of the AOA Membership.

Orthopaedic surgery continues to trail other specialties in increasing diversity among its physician workforce. Various efforts have been and are currently being made to not only increase diversity, but also promote equity and inclusion in the field. The purpose of this study was to survey members of the American Orthopaedic Association (AOA) to determine how leaders in orthopaedics view diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) at the present time and to understand their perspective while moving into the future. An anonymous 11-question survey was disseminated online to AOA members in May 2022. These individuals were identified by the AOA membership directory and the email ListServe. The survey included free-response and multiple-choice questions. Demographic information was self-identified, and both qualitative and quantitative data were collected. Of the 1,657 AOA members who were provided the survey, 262 (15.8%) responded. Approximately 29.5% (77) and 45.6% (119) of the surveyed population ranked "retention of underrepresented populations in orthopaedic residency (women, URiM)" as "very important" or "absolutely essential," respectively. The answers to the free-response questions identified multiple core themes that responders were passionate about, namely resident and attending physician recruitment and retention, as well as resident selection. Leaders in the field of orthopaedic surgery desire for action to be taken in the field of DEI. The findings of this survey denote positive attitudes even though many inequalities still pervade the field of orthopaedics. Through mentorship, objective evaluation, transparency, and continued intentional action, orthopaedic surgery is well-positioned to continue to move forward with DEI.

Does "Hoarding" Impact Interview Distribution Among Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Applicants? A Modeling Study Based on a Large Database.

"Interview hoarding" is commonly used to refer to the concentration of interview offers among a small number of high-performing residency applicants. Theoretically, if the same applicants interview at every program, fewer rank lists will be submitted than open residency positions, leading to a "match crisis" with unfilled positions after the match. There are no published studies we are aware of that describe the observed distribution of residency interview offers among orthopaedic surgery applicants or the potential impact of "hoarding" on that distribution. We examined the distribution of interview invitations extended to orthopaedic surgery residency applicants in the 2020 to 2021 and 2021 to 2022 application cycles. The change in the shape of the interview invitation distribution was the primary outcome for two central questions: (1) Does the interview offer distribution curve among orthopaedic surgery applicants change meaningfully from baseline with implementation of an interview cap (Model 1)? (2) What is the impact on the distribution of invitations with a reduction in the number of applicants in the field (Model 2)? This was a retrospective study of orthopaedic surgery interview invitations extended to applicants via the Thalamus interview management program during the 2020 to 2021 and 2021 to 2022 residency application cycles. The Thalamus database was chosen because it contains data on interview invitations for orthopaedic surgery residency positions and has the largest market share in orthopaedics compared with similar databases. Thalamus data represent 1565 applicants and 53 residency programs (90% and 25% of the national total, respectively) in 2021 to 2022 and 993 applicants and 46 programs (77% and 23%, respectively) in 2020 to 2021. It has been shown to contain a representative sample of orthopaedic residency programs. An interview cap (Model 1) was simulated by removing excess interviews held by applicants above the 75th and 95th percentiles, which were chosen to represent a formal cap and an informal cap, respectively. A reduction in the size of the applicant pool was similarly modeled by randomly removing 5% and 25% of applicants, chosen to simulate informal and formal application requirements, respectively. In both models, the excess interviews were redistributed among the remaining applicants. Applicants received a mean of 1.8 ± 2.2 Thalamus interview invitations in 2020 to 2021 and 1.7 ± 2.4 invitations in 2021 to 2022, with no change to the overall distribution curve. A total of 39% (606 of 1565) of applicants received no Thalamus interview invitations in 2021 to 2022, 75% (1176 of 1565) received two or fewer, and < 1% (14 of 1565) of applicants received 10 or more invitations. Redistributing excess interviews held by the top 5% of applicants resulted in 2% (61 of 2651) of interviews being redistributed (Model 1). Removing 5% of the total applicant pool resulted in a redistribution of 3% (87 of 2651) of the interview invitations (Model 2). Orthopaedic surgery interview data demonstrated an expected uneven distribution of interview invitations, with a small proportion of highly competitive applicants receiving a higher number of interview offers as well as a large group of applicants receiving no interview invitations in Thalamus. Concerns that "hoarding" would lead to a crisis resulting in many unmatched residency positions seemed unfounded, given the excess of applicants relative to positions and the minimal change in the distribution of interviews in the cap model. Medical students applying to orthopaedic residency should seek individual advising to improve their individual odds of matching, while understanding that interview hoarding does not seem to alter the distribution of interviews. Program directors and medical students' advisors should be cognizant that a small proportion of applicants are broadly interviewed and may benefit from steps taken to ensure applicants have genuine interest in the program.

Orthopedic Resident and Patient Perception of Electronic Medical Record Use During the Clinic Visit.

Background The transition from paper charts to electronic medical records (EMRs) has resulted in greater efficiency and reduced medical errors. This study aimed to examine the perception of patients and orthopedic residents regarding computer use during the clinic visit. Methodology This study utilized a cross-sectional cluster design. Orthopedic resident physicians were given a one-time general pre-visit survey. Additional surveys were given to patients and resident physicians post-visit. Surveys included questions that assessed satisfaction and the perceived impact of computer usage on doctor-patient interactions. Logistic generalized estimating equations were run to determine if there was an association between patient response and clinician assessment, adjusting for repeated measures within clinicians. Results A total of 80 patients and 15 residents completed the surveys. Results from the physician pre-visit survey showed that more residents perceived the computer as having a "negative" (47%) than "positive" (26%) effect on their relationship with patients. According to the post-visit analysis, patients perceived the residents' use of the EMR as having an overall positive effect on their ability to establish a personal connection and having a positive effect on their ability to give them attention. Conclusions Overall, there was little correlation between patient and resident perception of the computer's effect on their relationship. Patients generally perceived the computer as having a positive effect on their interaction with the residents even when residents had a negative perception of the computer's effect on their interaction.

Development of an Orthopedic Surgery Anatomy Curricular Model for Fourth Year Medical Students Using a Modified Delphi Method

The purpose of this study was to develop anatomy-focused learning outcomes that can be used to design a fourth-year elective for students matriculating into orthopedic surgery residencies. A series of proposed learning outcomes (N=72) was developed using the ACGME Orthopedic Milestones 2.0 as a framework. In 2021, these were converted into a survey asking participants to rate the importance of each outcome on a 5-point Likert scale. The modified Delphi Method was used to refine the list of outcomes until group consensus was achieved. The consensus was defined using a conservative 3-tier approach. Eighteen academic centers with an associated orthopedic surgery residency. Twenty-six orthopedic surgeons (ranging from 1 to 42 years in practice). Of the 72 learning outcomes from the first-round survey, 25 met consensus criteria. Of the 62 learning outcomes from the second-round survey, 45 met consensus criteria. All learning outcomes that met consensus criteria after the second-round survey were stratified into low-yield (n = 8), intermediate-yield (n = 34), and high-yield (n = 28) categories. Using a modified Delphi Method, this study elicited feedback from experts in the field of orthopedic surgery to develop a framework for a fourth-year elective focused on anatomical concepts important for students applying to residencies in orthopedic surgery. The product of this process affords a great deal of flexibility when utilizing the results of this study in institution-specific curricular development.

Interobserver Agreement and Satisfaction With the use of Telemedicine for Evaluating low Back Pain: A Primary, Observational, Cross-Sectional, Analytical Study.

A primary, observational, cross-sectional, analytical study. The development of a framework for systematic telemedicine (TM) for orthopedic physicians in frequent clinical care may increase agreement in diagnosis and satisfaction among users of TM. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate the agreement in the diagnosis of low back pain (LBP) between TM, systematized by a self-completed digital questionnaire, and face-to-face (FF) care in patients with LBP. This study included adults up to 75years of age with LBP for more than 6 weeks. They were evaluated at 2 independent time points (TM and FF) by different orthopedists with 3 different levels of expertise. Professionals evaluated the sample without prior knowledge of the diagnosis, and each orthopedist provided a diagnosis. Diagnostic agreement was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were the duration of the visit and satisfaction among healthcare professionals. A total of 168 participants were eligible, of whom 126 sought care through TM and 122 sought FF care (mean age, 47 years [range, 18-75years]; 66.4% women). The agreement among professionals regarding the diagnosis was moderate (kappa = .585, P = .001). TM was faster than FF (11.9minutes (standard deviation = 4.1) vs 18.6 (SD = 6.9), P < .001). Professional satisfaction was higher among spine specialists than among orthopedic residents and orthopedists who were not specialists in spine surgery. Agreement in diagnosis was moderate for TM, with a 30% shorter visit duration than FF. Satisfaction varied by professional expertise and was higher among spine specialists than among professionals with other expertise.

Comparisons of Procedures Performed in Training vs in Early Practice by Orthopaedic Trauma Surgeons.

The Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) has maintained an accreditation process of orthopaedic trauma fellowships with various requirements including an annually reviewed list of qualifying trauma cases in the form of American Medical Association Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. The correlation between these established and monitored CPTs and the actual practices of orthopaedic trauma surgeons has not been studied. American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery part II case logs (trauma subspecialty) (2012 to 2018) were compared with OTA fellowship case logs (2015 to 2019). Case logs from 447 surgeons and 166 trauma fellowship programs were compared. Four CPT code categories were defined: complex trauma (OTA required CPT codes, excluding Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education [ACGME] orthopaedic residency requirements), general trauma (ACGME residency required trauma codes), general orthopaedics (nontrauma ACGME residency requirements), and others (codes not included in residency or trauma fellowship requirements). OTA fellows performed a higher median percentage of complex trauma compared with American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery candidates (34% vs. 21%, P < 0.001): Both cohorts performed a similar percentage of general trauma (23%). OTA fellows performed more general orthopaedics (40% vs. 1%, P < 0.001). Several OTA required codes were performed infrequently (0 to 3 during board collection) by most surgeons, and several procedures are being performed that are not included in current CPT code requirements. Early-career traumatologists are performing orthopaedic trauma procedures they were trained on during residency and fellowship, with varying complexity. Trauma fellows perform a higher percentage of complex trauma compared with early-career trauma surgeons. Continued surveillance is necessary such that educational improvements can be made to maximize the quality of trauma fellowship education. Level III, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Unveiling the Economic Toll of Surgical Learning Curve in Elderly Hip Fractures.

Can the financial impact of implant choice during the learning curve of inexperienced surgeons in hip fracture surgery be quantified? Hip fractures in the elderly are a significant medical concern, often requiring surgical interventions performed by orthopedic surgery residents. As healthcare costs rise, exploring cost reduction opportunities within the healthcare system becomes crucial. In this prospective analysis, we examined the financial implications of implant choices encountered by residents during their learning curve in hip fracture surgery. Our study included 278 surgically treated pertrochanteric fractures using the same locking cephalomedullary nail. Data on patients, surgeons (including their experience and seniority), and all implants charged by the hospital were collected. This encompassed documentation of any nail-related equipment that was opened on the operating table and whether it was subsequently used by the end of the procedure. By calculating the number and cost of these implants, we assessed the financial burden associated with suboptimal choices made during the learning curve. Our findings revealed that in 16.18% of surgeries, instances of suboptimal implant utilization occurred, highlighting the complexities of the learning process. Importantly, the rate of these challenges was not influenced by surgeon seniority or patient characteristics. The mean additional cost per surgery was determined to be USD 65.69 ± 157.63 for surgeries with suboptimal implant utilization, compared to USD 56.55 ± 139.13 for surgeries without such challenges. Although there was a trend towards higher implant-related costs in resident-led surgeries, the difference did not reach statistical significance. These findings underscore the feasibility of enabling residents to autonomously perform intramedullary nailing surgeries, even without specialist supervision, while incurring minimal additional expenses during the learning curve. By acknowledging the financial implications associated with the learning curve in the management of hip fractures, we can strive to optimize healthcare costs, thus addressing an important aspect of this issue.

CORR Insights®: What are the Trends in Racial Diversity Among Orthopaedic Applicants, Residents, and Faculty?

CORR Insights®: What are the Trends in Racial Diversity Among Orthopaedic Applicants, Residents, and Faculty?

Technology-Assisted Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Orthopaedic Residency Training: A National Survey.

The adoption of technology-assisted total joint arthroplasty (TA-TJA) is increasing; however, the extent to which TA-TJA is used among orthopaedic trainees is unknown. The purpose of this study was to assess the current use of TA total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) by orthopaedic residents and to evaluate resident perceptions toward TA-TJA in their surgical training. In this cross-sectional study, an anonymous electronic survey was sent to all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited orthopaedic surgery residency program coordinators to distribute to their PGY-2 to PGY-5 residents. The survey consisted of 24 questions, including resident demographics, utilization of TA-TJA in their training, and perceptions regarding TA-TJA. A total of 103 orthopaedic residents completed the survey, of whom 68.0% reported using TA-TJA at their institution. Of the residents using TA-TJA, 28.6% used TA for total TKA only, 71.4% used TA for both TKA and THA, and none used TA solely for THA. One-third of residents (33.3%) use TA for more than half of all TKAs conducted, whereas 57.0% use TA for <10% of all THAs conducted. Approximately half of all residents (49.5%) thought that training in TA-TJA should be required during residency, with no significant differences between junior and senior level residents ( P = 0.24). Most (82.0%) thought that trainees should be required to learn conventional TJA before learning TA-TJA. 63.0% thought that technology had a positive effect on their primary TJA training experience; however, 26.0% reported concern that their training conducting conventional TJA may be inadequate. This study demonstrates that most orthopaedic residents currently conduct TA-TJA and highlights notable differences in TJA training experiences. These results provide a platform for future work aimed at further optimizing TJA training in residency, particularly as technology continues to rapidly evolve and utilization of TA-TJA is projected to grow exponentially. N/A, survey-based study.

Outcomes of Incidental Durotomy Repair in Thoracolumbar Spine Surgery: An Institutional Experience With Orthopedic Residents.

Background The occurrence of incidental durotomies (IDs) following spinal operations is a widely recognized issue. Complications such as poor outcomes, extended hospitalization, prolonged immobilization, infections, and revision surgeries are all potential consequences of inadequate durotomy management during the initial surgery. This study aims to describe the outcomes of ID repair in thoracolumbar spine surgery in terms of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score and visual analog scale (VAS) when performed with the active involvement of orthopedic residents in the surgical procedure. Methodology Between April 2021 and April 2023, a hospital-based observational study was conducted among 110 patients hospitalized in the orthopedic ward at R.L. Jalappa Hospital and Research Center in Kolar, Karnataka, who required IDs due to an accidental dural tear or a postoperative CSF fluid leak following thoracolumbar spine procedures. Patients with a previous history of thoracolumbar spine surgery, vertebral tumors, spinal metastasis, infections, e.g., spondylodiscitis, or Pott's spine were excluded. The ODI score and VAS score were calculated on the postoperative day, one month, and three months following surgery. Results The mean age of the study participants was 62.81 + 10.49 years, with a male preponderance of 67.2% among the study participants. The mean BMI of study participants was 23.77 kg/m2. Approximately 24.5% of participants had a prior history of spinal surgery. Among 110 patients, 32 had postoperative complications. Six patients reported experiencing urinary retention, followed by five with CSF leakage and one with a postural headache(five cases). Based on the ODI score, mild disability was seen in 32.7% of the study samples at three months of follow-up. Based on the VAS score, moderate pain was seen among all the study samples at three months of follow-up. The ANOVA test revealed statistically significant differences in ODI and VAS score reductions between the immediate postoperative period and the one-month and three-month follow-up periods (p = 0.001 and p = 0.0247, respectively). Conclusion Less than one-third of the samples had postoperative complications. At three months, ODI scores showed mild disability in one-third of the study samples. At three months, all study samples had moderate VAS pain. The improvement in ODI and VAS scores from the day after surgery through the one-month and three-month follow-up periods was statistically significant.

Diversity-Related Positions in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Programs.

The Association of American Medical Colleges and the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons have incorporated diversity and inclusion as one of their primary goals. Orthopaedic surgery remains the least diverse medical specialty when measured for practicing physicians and trainees. The purpose of this study was to determine the number and distinct types of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) positions within orthopaedic surgery residency programs in the United States. The Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database was used to obtain a list of all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited orthopaedic surgery residency programs. The following was collected from 193 residency program websites between June 6, 2022, and June 26, 2022: program location, university or community based, allopathic or osteopathic recognition, number of faculty in the orthopaedic department, number of residents per year, diversity-related statements, and diversity-focused faculty positions. Of the 193 programs evaluated, 74 (38.9%) included DEI statements on their website while only 42 (21.8%) had at least one DEI-specific faculty role (e.g., diversity committee, diversity liaison, vice chair for DEI). For 16 (8.3%) programs, the faculty role was nonspecific to the orthopaedic residency program. Nonspecific roles were primarily created by the affiliated school of medicine, but in 4 (2.1%) outlier cases, faculty members assumed DEI roles through a medical center, a graduate medical education program, or a department of surgery. Less than half of orthopaedic surgery residency programs currently advocate for DEI on their associated websites while fewer than 25% have a DEI faculty position. Previous studies have called for a greater number of DEI positions and committees among orthopaedic residencies because of the lower admittance rate of qualified Under Represented in Medicine (URiM) applicants. A role dedicated to DEI may increase the number of women and URiM applicants pursuing a career in orthopaedic surgery.

Assessing Gender Differences in Technical Skills and Confidence in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Applicants.

Variations in confidence for procedural skills have been demonstrated when comparing male and female medical students in surgical training. This study investigates whether differences in technical skill and self-reported confidence exist between male and female medical students applying to orthopaedic residency. All medical students (2017 to 2020) invited to interview at a single orthopaedic residency program were prospectively evaluated on their technical skills and self-reported confidence. Objective evaluation of technical skill included scores for a suturing task as evaluated by faculty graders. Self-reported confidence in technical skills was assessed before and after completing the assigned task. Scores for male and female students were compared by age, self-identified race/ethnicity, number of publications at the time of application, athletic background, and US Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 score. Two hundred sixteen medical students were interviewed, of which 73% were male (n = 158). No gender differences were observed in suture task technical skill scores or mean difference in simultaneous visual task scores. The mean change from pre-task and post-task self-reported confidence scores was similar between sexes. Although female students trended toward lower post-task self-reported confidence scores compared with male students, this did not achieve statistical significance. Lower self-reported confidence was associated with a higher US Medical Licensing Examination score and with attending a private medical school. No difference in technical skill or confidence was found between male and female applicants to a single orthopaedic surgery residency program. Female applicants trended toward self-reporting lower confidence than male applicants in post-task evaluations. Differences in confidence have been shown previously in surgical trainees, which may suggest that differences in skill and confidence may develop during residency training.

Decoding the Signals: An Analysis of Preference Signaling in the 2023 Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Match.

While previously used in other specialties, the preference signaling program (PSP) was implemented in the 2022 to 2023 orthopaedic surgery residency application process for the first time. The PSP allowed for 30 signaling tokens to be sent by applicants to programs of their choice to indicate particular interest in a program. It remains unknown how the PSP affects applicants and programs in the orthopaedic surgery residency match. Thus, this study's purpose was to assess the utility of preference signaling within the orthopaedic surgery residency application process in its inaugural year of use. An anonymous electronic survey was emailed to all orthopaedic surgery residency applicants who applied to the authors' institution during the 2022 to 2023 application cycle. The survey was sent after match lists were submitted and closed before the release of match results. The survey collected information regarding applicant demographics, preference signaling habits, and attitude toward preference signaling. The survey was completed by 101 applicants. Applicants applied to a mean of 90 programs (range: 10-197) and received an average of 12 interview invitations (range: 0-39). Applicants almost uniformly used all 30 signals, with nearly two-thirds signaling their home programs (65%, 49/76), and nearly all applicants sending signals to programs at which they performed away rotations (95.7%, 88/92). Applicants received a mean of 9 invitations from programs they signaled, compared with 2 invitations from programs they did not signal. Applicants were significantly more likely to receive an interview invite at a program they signaled than one they did not (p < 0.01). Overall, 57% of applicants (57/101) found the PSP to be helpful, whereas 28% (28/101) found it to be unhelpful, and 16% (16/101) had a neutral opinion. This study reports that the PSP in the 2022 to 2023 orthopaedic surgery match was an effective method of expressing interest in a program because applicants were significantly more likely to receive interview invites to signaled programs. More than half of respondents felt PSP to be helpful; however, the effect on application numbers is still unclear. III.

Match Rates Among Underrepresented Minority and Female Applicants to Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Programs from 2011 to 2021: How Are We Doing?

Orthopaedic surgery residency programs have traditionally had less representation of underrepresented minority (URM) and female trainees compared with other medical specialties. Widespread efforts have been implemented to increase the diversity of orthopaedic surgery residency programs; however, it is not known whether URM and female applicants are increasingly likely to match as a result. Thus, we aimed to study the independent association between URM and female applicants and matching into orthopaedic surgery over the past decade. Applicant-level data from the Electronic Residency Application Service were reviewed from 2011 to 2021 with variables including demographic variables, URM status, and matriculation to an orthopaedic surgery residency program. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the likelihood of matriculating into orthopaedic surgery when controlling for number of applications, top 40 medical school status, AOA status, and MD/other degree. Twelve thousand one hundred eleven applicants were identified from 2011 to 2021 with a match rate of 70% overall. Two thousand fifty-six applicants (17%) were female and 1,926 (16%) classified as URM. The total number of applications increased from 1,074 in 2011 to 1,229 in 2021. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) associated with matching among all applicants decreased from 0.75 in 2011 to 0.64 in 2021, p < 0.001, and the OR of non-URM male and female applicants also decreased (female: 0.79-0.69, p < 0.001; male: 0.78-0.65, p < 0.001). The OR of URM male applicants did not change significantly (0.57-0.55, p = 0.60). The OR for URM female applicants, however, increased significantly from 0.46 to 0.61, p < 0.001. Over the entire time frame, the odds of matching were significantly lower for URM applicants compared with non-URM applicants (both male and female). Overall, the adjusted odds ratio of matching into orthopaedic surgery among female URM applicants has increased over the past decade, indicating successful efforts to improve the diversity of orthopaedic surgery training programs. The odds of URM male applicants have remained relatively constant, and the odds of URM male and female applicants were significantly lower than all non-URM applicants. III.

Health Literacy Awareness Among Orthopaedic Surgery Residents: A COERG Survey.

This study was endorsed by the Collaborative Orthopaedic Education Research Group board. A 17-item questionnaire was administered anonymously to orthopaedic residents through a secure online platform in the 2020 to 2021 academic year. All participation was voluntary. One hundred ninety-two residents (42%) from 19 orthopaedic programs completed the survey. Most residents felt "somewhat comfortable" with issues related to HL. Most residents reported no specific training in HL issues during residency (77.5%). Of the 43 residents (22.3%) who did receive formal training, most of these individuals felt that the training is effective (N = 42, 97.7%). Role playing/standardized patient encounters were reported as the most effective form of HL training. Residents felt it was somewhat important to receive formal HL training in residency (median = 4.0, interquartile range = 3.0-5.0), and there was a modest desire for formalized training (39%). This study is the first to characterize orthopaedic resident perceptions of HL issues in practice and training. Residents were somewhat confident in their understanding of HL concepts, and those who received formal training felt it was effective. However, there remains a low rate of formal orthopaedic resident training in HL issues, which may be an area for improvement in orthopaedic training paradigms.

Poster 379: Mentorship and Research Program to Improve Opportunity Among Underrepresented Students Pursuing Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine

Objectives: In North America, the orthopaedic specialty has limited diversity with over 80% of orthopaedic surgeons being caucaisan male. Over the last 20 years, many specialty societies have attempted to improve diversity in the specialty, with limited changes over the last 10 years. The purpose of this program was to identify a diverse and under-represented group of potential orthopaedic surgery resident candidates in the last year of college or first 2 years of medical school, and create an educational/mentorship experience that would increase their interest in orthopaedic careers. Methods: Over a 2-year period, we received over 250 applications and selected 17 and 10 students to participate in the summer 2021 and 2022 programs respectively. The program delivered a curriculum from June-August 2021, and 2022 consisting of 1) weekly instructional courses on research-related topics led by a content expert; 2) weekly faculty lectures discussing topics including orthopaedic topics, diversity in medicine, leadership, and work-life balance; and 3) an 8-week summer research experience paired with a faculty and peer mentor. We surveyed students to measure skill progression, satisfaction, and overall program evaluation. Pre/post-program evaluation, mid-program check-in, and student feedback surveys were collected. Results: Program participants represented a range of race and ethnic backgrounds, research experience level, and various geographic locations across the US. The cohort included a high rate of female (48%) and Black (30%) participants. On average, post-program survey scores indicated that participants believed that the summer program improved their research skills (9.4 of 10), improved their orthopaedic interest (9 of 10), and improved mentorship and networking (9.3 of 10). For feedback surveys, respondents (88%) felt they were adequately matched to their faculty mentor. (72% felt they had realistic deliverables for research projects within the 8-week program. 92% indicated they contributed to an abstract or manuscript as a co-author. Over 50% plan to apply to orthopaedic residency. Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of building a high-impact remote summer program catered to underrepresented students interested in orthopaedics. Although a remote program has some limitations, it has some advantages, including : 1. allowing for a significant mentorship/research experience, that does not involve the cost/complexity of travel for 2 months, and 2. it allows access to people from a larger geographic area. Our findings indicate that students improved their research skills, interest, and confidence to pursue orthopaedic residency, and mentorship/networks in the field. We plan to longitudinally track program alumni and evaluate the overall impact of this program on the field of orthopaedics. This program is simple – a remote mentoring/research opportunity, that requires a small investment for centers to participate – but would benefit from having more mentors for the students. The large number of student applicants confirms a significant number of students that are interested in this program, and access to more mentors could increase the size and impact of the program. We encourage other centers to develop similar programs to support increased diversity in those that will pursue careers in orthopaedics and sports medicine.

Evaluating ChatGPT Performance on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination.

Artificial intelligence (AI) holds potential in improving medical education and healthcare delivery. ChatGPT is a state-of-the-art natural language processing AI model which has shown impressive capabilities, scoring in the top percentiles on numerous standardized examinations, including the Uniform Bar Exam and Scholastic Aptitude Test. The goal of this study was to evaluate ChatGPT performance on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE), an assessment of medical knowledge for orthopedic residents. OITE 2020, 2021, and 2022 questions without images were inputted into ChatGPT version 3.5 and version 4 (GPT-4) with zero prompting. The performance of ChatGPT was evaluated as a percentage of correct responses and compared with the national average of orthopedic surgery residents at each postgraduate year (PGY) level. ChatGPT was asked to provide a source for its answer, which was categorized as being a journal article, book, or website, and if the source could be verified. Impact factor for the journal cited was also recorded. ChatGPT answered 196 of 360 answers correctly (54.3%), corresponding to a PGY-1 level. ChatGPT cited a verifiable source in 47.2% of questions, with an average median journal impact factor of 5.4. GPT-4 answered 265 of 360 questions correctly (73.6%), corresponding to the average performance of a PGY-5 and exceeding the corresponding passing score for the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part I Examination of 67%. GPT-4 cited a verifiable source in 87.9% of questions, with an average median journal impact factor of 5.2. ChatGPT performed above the average PGY-1 level and GPT-4 performed better than the average PGY-5 level, showing major improvement. Further investigation is needed to determine how successive versions of ChatGPT would perform and how to optimize this technology to improve medical education. AI has the potential to aid in medical education and healthcare delivery.

Poster 389: Operating Through the Pain: Systematic Review of Musculoskeletal Pain and Injury Epidemiology Among Orthopedic Surgeons and Trainees

Objectives: Many orthopedic surgeons experience work-related injury and musculoskeletal symptoms. The culture of orthopedics lends itself to surgeons and trainees operating through such injuries, which may jeopardize the health of orthopedic surgeons and impact their ability to provide exemplary patient care. The objective of this study was to present a comprehensive synthesis of the literature pertaining to occupational injuries among orthopedic surgeons, with particular emphasis on characterizing the predominant causes, treatments, and reported outcomes associated with these injuries. Methods: A systematic review of the English-language literature from PubMed, Embase, and Scopus was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. All studies assessing MSK-injury/pain epidemiology, treatment, or outcomes among orthopedic surgeons and trainees were included. Studies primarily assessing ergonomics pertaining to specific manufacturers or devices were excluded. Reviews, meta- analyses, editorials and conference abstracts were excluded. Results: The literature search yielded 719 abstracts, and a total of 11 articles were identified for inclusion. All included studies were survey-based. A total of 2153 orthopedic surgeons, fellows, and residents were surveyed across several subspecialties (Table 1). 1547 orthopedic surgeons and trainees (71.9%) reported present or past work-related or work-exacerbated musculoskeletal injury/pain (Table 2). Four studies reported the back as the most commonly injured body part (Table 2). Four studies reported pain scores (Table 2). Three studies noted a greater prevalence of acute pain/injury as compared to chronic pain/injury (Table 2). Seven studies investigated the treatment of musculoskeletal injury/pain among orthopedic surgeons and trainees, including surgical, non-surgical, and pharmacological interventions (Table 3). A total of 605 of 1054 injured orthopedic surgeons/trainees (57.4%) received some form of treatment for musculoskeletal pain/injury. However, only 305 of 1054 injured orthopedic surgeons and trainees (28.9%) took time off from work due to pain/injury. Three studies compared the incidence of musculoskeletal injury/pain by orthopedic subspecialty and found no difference between subspecialties (Table 4). One study compared injury/pain incidence by training level and found no difference. Seven studies compared injury/pain incidence by sex and found no difference (Table 4). Nine studies assessed injury/pain incidence by number of years in practice; five of these studies reported a statistically significant association, where a higher number of years in practice correlated positively with a higher incidence of musculoskeletal injury/pain (Table 4). Conclusions: Many orthopedic surgeons and trainees experience musculoskeletal pain/injury and work through these symptoms. Many surgeons believe their injury/pain will have a deleterious impact on surgical performance and patient care. Thus, hospitals and other administrative programs should consider assessing orthopedic surgeons’ physical health and encourage paid rest time or other treatment modalities to promote surgeon well-being and optimize patient outcomes. [Table: see text][Table: see text][Table: see text][Table: see text]

Effect of a surgical skills month on intern performance in the orthopaedic in-training examination

Background: The orthopaedic in-training examination (OITE) is an annual national assessment of knowledge in orthopaedic surgery residents. Our primary aim was to determine if intern performance in the OITE (measured by correct answers) differed before and after the adoption of a formal surgical skills month (SSM) in the residency curriculum. A secondary aim was to evaluate the relationship between intern OITE and post-graduate year two (PGY-2) scores. Methods: A single institution retrospective cohort study was performed, comparing orthopaedic surgery interns who took the OITE before (15 residents) and after (16 residents) the year 2013 (when an SSM was introduced). De-identified OITE raw and percentage correct scores were obtained from all resident records. Statistical testing included independent sample t test and linear regression, with a significance level of 0.05. Results: Comparison of OITE percentage of correct answers overall, between interns before and after 2013, showed a significant increase after initiating the SSM (44.8%±4.13% vs. 49.9%±8.44%, P=0.0414). In addition, regression analysis demonstrated a positive linear relationship between intern and PGY-2 OITE scores after the SSM was implemented (R 2=0.380, P=0.011, β=0.424, CI: 0.1135341 –1.190913). Conclusion: Implementation of an SSM led to increased intern OITE scores. Moreover, intern OITE scores were more predictive of PGY-2 scores after SSM implementation. Earlier education (such as a surgical skills month) for orthopaedic surgery interns can aid knowledge acquisition and career development at the beginning of their training. Level of Evidence: Level III.