Orthopaedic Population Research Articles

Food Insecurity Is Common in the Orthopaedic Trauma Population.

Food insecurity is the condition of limited access to healthy and safe food. Malnutrition resulting from food insecurity is a concern particularly in the surgical population due to the association with impaired healing. This aim of this study was to report the incidence and risk factors for food insecurity in the orthopaedic trauma population. Orthopaedic trauma centers at three distinct regions of the United States enrolled patients who had undergone extremity or pelvis fracture fixation within the previous 6 months. Participants completed the United States Department of Agriculture Household Food Insecurity Survey, and food insecurity was defined as a score ≥3. In addition, participants recorded patient demographics and injury/treatment/household characteristics and completed information about diet quality. Diet quality was compared between households with and without food insecurity using chi-square or Fisher exact tests. Logistic regression was used to create a multivariable model of factors associated with greater odds of food insecurity. Food insecurity was documented in 11.5% (81/703) of households. Households with food insecurity were less likely to report daily consumption of fruit, vegetables, and protein-rich foods. We found a greater odds of food insecurity among households with a yearly income of <$50,000 (odds ratio = 4.30 [95% confidence interval = 2.07 to 8.92], P < 0.001), tobacco use (2.33 [1.26 to 4.28], P = 0.007), Medicaid or no insurance (2.34 [1.19 to 4.62], P = 0.014), and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity (4.55 [1.69 to 12.24], P = 0.003), for each 10-year decrease in age (1.19 [1.00 to 1.40], P = 0.045), multiple surgically treated fractures (2.41 [1.08 to 5.35], P = 0.031), and for each additional 15 minutes of travel time to the nearest grocery store (2.12 [1.37 to 3.26], P < 0.001). Food insecurity is common in the orthopaedic trauma population, and households with food insecurity are more likely to have low diet quality. Nutrition supplementation during the healing phase after trauma and referral to nutrition assistance programs has the potential to mitigate malnutrition and prevent negative outcomes resulting from food insecurity.

Common Comorbidities and a Comparison of 4 Comorbidity Indices in Patients Undergoing Orthopaedic Oncology Surgery.

Comorbidity indices are used to help to estimate patients' length of hospital stay, care costs, outcomes, and mortality. Increasingly, they are considered in reimbursement models. The applicability of comorbidity indices to patients undergoing orthopaedic oncology surgery has not been studied. The purpose of this study was to determine the predominant comorbidities in patients undergoing orthopaedic oncology surgery and to evaluate the predictive value of these indices. Patient demographic characteristics, diagnoses, and preoperative comorbidities were collected retrospectively on 300 patients undergoing orthopaedic oncology surgery between January 2014 and March 2023. In this study, 3 subsets of 100 patients each with malignant primary bone tumors, malignant primary soft-tissue tumors, or osseous metastatic disease were randomly selected. Comorbidities were tabulated and weighted according to the guidelines of the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), the National Institute on Aging/National Cancer Institute (NIA/NCI) index, the van Walraven Index, and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Index. Two-tailed bivariate Pearson correlations were performed to assess the relationship between the indices and between each index and patient outcomes. Comorbidities in our patient population were compared with those published in other studies. The predominant comorbidities in patients undergoing orthopaedic oncology surgery were hypertension, deficiency anemias, metastatic disease, recent unintended weight loss or being underweight, and fluid or electrolyte disorders. The percentage of patients with certain comorbidities exceeded those reported in other cancer, orthopaedic, and inpatient populations. The 4 comorbidity indices had variable correlation when assessing our patient population. The number of comorbidities and the weighted scores from all indices demonstrated little to no correlation with length of stay and survival in our patient sample. The prevalence of many comorbidities in patients undergoing orthopaedic oncology surgery is greater than those reported in other patient populations. Commonly utilized indices demonstrate variable correlation with one another. With these tools, there was little to no correlation between comorbidities and patient outcomes in our patient population. The comorbidities deemed protective in these tools may underestimate the true assessment of the comorbidities in patients undergoing orthopaedic oncology surgery. This highlights the importance of developing tools to properly assess the comorbidities in defined patient populations, especially as these models are used to set benchmarks for measuring patient outcomes; assessing quality, efficiency, and safety; and determining reimbursement criteria. Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Injury-Associated Anemia in Orthopaedic Trauma: A Comprehensive Review.

» Anemia is a common comorbidity in orthopaedic trauma patients with important clinical consequences, significantly negatively affecting a patient's course following orthopaedic trauma.» Anemia remains relatively understudied in the orthopaedic trauma population with a large amount of current literature focused solely on geriatric hip fracture patients.» Greater investigation into alternatives to blood transfusions such as iron therapy or cell salvaging for treatment of anemia in the orthopaedic trauma population is needed.

Opportunistic Computed Tomography: A Novel Opportunity for Osteoporosis Screening.

Retrospective review. To use opportunistic computed tomography (CT) screening to determine the prevalence of osteoporosis (OP) in patients presenting with spinal fractures and the rate of identification and treatment at our institution. OP remains a highly underdiagnosed and undertreated disease. Opportunistic abdominopelvic CT scans offer a feasible, accessible, and cost-effective screening tool for OP. Retrospective review of 519 patients presenting as trauma activation to the emergency department of a Level 1 Trauma Center after a spinal fracture. Patients were excluded if under the age of 18 or lacking a CT scan upon arrival in the emergency department. Hounsfield Units (HU) were measured at the L1 vertebral level on CT scans to determine bone density levels. Values of ≤100 HU were considered osteoporotic, whereas 101-150 HU were osteopenic. A total of 424 patients were included. The average HU was 204.8 ± 74.3 HU. Of the patients, 16.7% were diagnosed as osteopenic and 9.9% as osteoporotic. The mean age was 65 ± 14 years for osteopenic patients and 77 ± 11 years for osteoporotic. A statistically significant inverse relationship was found between age and bone density. Of the patients, 42.5% with low bone density HU measurements had a previously documented history of OP/osteopenia. There was a statistically significant association between females and low bone density. Patients injured in a fall were statistically significantly more likely to have lower bone densities than those in motor vehicle accidents. Of the osteoporotic patients, 9.5% were treated by our institution's fragility fracture team. Our study shows that among a cohort of patients with spinal fractures, 58% of patients with radiographic signs of OP are currently undiagnosed, resulting in a low treatment rate of OP. Increasing and standardizing the use of opportunistic CT scans would allow an increase in the diagnosis and treatment of OP in patients with spinal fractures. Further, opportunistic CT scans could also be useful for a broader orthopedic population at high risk of fragility fractures. Level II-therapeutic.

Area Deprivation Index as a proxy for socioeconomic status in outpatient orthopaedic surgery patients – A prospective registry cross sectional study

BackgroundWe aimed to determine if Area Deprivation Index (ADI) is associated with self-reported metrics socioeconomic status (SES), and to assess the relationship between ADI and preoperative score on common patient reported outcome scores (PROS). MethodsPatients presenting for outpatient orthopaedic surgery completed Patient-Reported Outcome Metric Information System (PROMIS) and joint-specific PROS. ADI was determined from geocoded home address. Sociodemographic data was collected from self-reported survey. Tests of association were used to describe the relationship between ADI and sociodemographic factors as well as the correlation between ADI and PROS. Extreme group analysis was used to examine which PROS may be subject to clinically meaningful variation. ResultsADI was associated with self-reported SES. ADI was correlated with score on all baseline PROS. Extreme group analysis showed that low SES was associated with clinically meaningful differences in some, but not all, PROS. ConclusionADI is associated with self-reported measures of SES in an orthopaedic outpatient surgical population. Lower SES correlates with worse function to a clinically significant degree for some PROS. SES should be considered in the context of preoperative symptom severity in outpatient orthopaedic surgery patients. ADI may be a useful adjunct to self-reported measures of SES for this purpose.

The Lack of Reporting Social Determinants of Health in Pediatric Orthopaedic Randomized Controlled Trials.

Social determinants of health (SDOHs) affect health outcomes outside the hospital, and understanding them can enhance postoperative outcomes in orthopaedic surgery patients. This study aimed to describe the prevalence of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in pediatric orthopaedic journals reporting on the SDOHs of their patient cohorts. We hypothesize that many SDOHs will be underreported in RCTs investigating pediatric orthopaedic surgery. Utilizing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, the authors queried the PubMed database to examine SDOHs from 2 pediatric orthopaedic journals: Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics and Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics: Part B. The inclusion criteria incorporated RCTs published between 2005 and April 2024. The exclusion criteria included any articles that were not RCTs published in this period. One hundred thirteen articles met the search criteria, with 31 excluded because they did not fall from 2005 to 2024. Eighty-two were published from 2005 to 2024, but 6 RCTs were excluded, as 3 were non-RCTs, and 3 examined cadavers. Seventy-six RCTs were included for analysis, with 65 articles from the Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics and 11 articles from the Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics: Part B . Articles originated from 17 countries, with the United States producing 61.8% (47) of the included studies. Of all 76 included studies, 96.1% (73) reported age, 88.2% (67) reported sex/gender, 30.3% (23) reported BMI, 21.1% (16) reported race/ethnicity, 5.3% (4) reported educational level, 2.6% (2) reported stress, and 2.6% (2) reported insurance. Smoking status, socioeconomic status, income levels, and employment status were each reported by only 1 study. The RCTs examining pediatric orthopaedic surgery tend to scarcely report SDOHs. Future RCTs should expand beyond demographic characteristics such as age, race/ethnicity, sex/gender, and BMI and incorporate other relevant SDOHs. This will allow us to develop a more comprehensive understanding of health outcomes in the pediatric orthopaedic population. I; Therapeutic Studies.

Challenges of perioperative pain control in opioid use disorder patients following intramedullary nail fixation.

Outcomes of patients with opioid use disorder undergoing elective procedures have been well studied, but research is lacking in the orthopaedic trauma population. The aim was to compare perioperative pain and morphine equivalents required by patients with versus without opioid use disorder following intramedullary nail fixation of femoral or tibial fractures. We conducted a retrospective review of all patients with isolated femoral or tibial diaphyseal fractures treated with intramedullary nail fixation. Outcomes were compared between patients with diagnosed opioid use disorder and controls without, including daily morphine equivalents and patient-reported pain scores. Patients with opioid use disorder (n = 42) required greater morphine equivalents and reported higher pain than controls (n = 42) at all time points but did not differ in change of morphine equivalents over the perioperative period. This highlights the challenge of perioperative pain control in this population and need for improved specific pain management protocols.

Risk factors associated with surgical site infection following orthopaedic surgery in South Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review protocol.

The objective of the scoping review will be to understand and describe risk factors associated with surgical site infection (SSI) in an orthopaedic surgery population in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Africa. This paper describes the protocol that will be used for the scoping review. A comprehensive literature search will be conducted using MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL (EBSCO), Embase and Cochrane Libraries to identify articles meeting the inclusion criteria, including both published and grey literature, in order to provide a broad overview of the reported risk factors associated with patients who have undergone an orthopaedic surgery with an outcome of SSI within 90 days of a procedure. Additional studies will be sourced by exploring the reference list of included eligible studies. By using a combination of the Population, Exposure, Outcome framework, terms and synonyms related to each category, in different variations, along with Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT) in the search strategy, identified comprehensive and relevant literature for the scoping review. It is anticipated the results will provide a baseline of risk factors that will inform the development of a risk assessment tool for clinical use. This protocol will inform the development of a scoping review to describe factors associated with SSIs following orthopaedic surgery in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Africa.

Risk Analysis Index Frailty Score as a Predictor of Otolaryngology Surgical Outcomes.

The Risk Analysis Index (RAI) score is a screening tool to assess patient frailty. It has been shown to be predictive of postoperative outcomes and mortality in orthopedic, urologic, and neurosurgical patient populations. We sought to evaluate the predictive ability of RAI score for surgical outcomes in an otolaryngology patient population. Retrospective study. Academic tertiary medical center. A retrospective study was conducted of adult patients undergoing otolaryngology surgery at a tertiary medical care center over 21 months. Patients were sent electronic RAI survey questionnaires via direct messaging, which was completed prior to surgery. Endpoint data were analyzed, including demographics, RAI score, and patient outcome data. Univariate analysis, ROC curves, and predictive modeling were utilized. A total of 517 patients responded to the RAI questionnaire, resulting in a 59.6% response rate. Mean RAI score was 21.38 ± 11.83. Higher RAI scores were associated with increased 30-day readmissions (P < .0015), postoperative complications (P < .001), hospital length of stay (P < .001), and discharge with home health (P < .001). Predictive models for RAI score and postoperative outcomes were created, and a cutoff score of RAI = 30 was established to identify frail patients. We evaluated if RAI scoring predicted postoperative complications in an otolaryngology patient population. Increased RAI score is significantly associated with poorer surgical outcomes, including increased hospital length of stay, 30-day readmissions, and postoperative complications. We propose a predictive model with suggested RAI cutoff scoring for use in the otolaryngology surgical population.

Gunshot Trauma Patients Have Higher Risk of PTSD Compared With Blunt Trauma and Elective Populations: A Retrospective Comparative Study of Outpatient Orthopaedic Care.

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has been extensively studied in patients who have experienced natural disasters or military conflict, but there remains a substantial gap in knowledge about the prevalence of PTSD after civilian orthopaedic trauma, especially as related to firearms. Gun violence is endemic in the United States, especially in urban centers, and the mental impact is often minimized during the treatment of physical injuries. (1) Do patients who experience gunshot wound (GSW) trauma have higher PTSD screening scores compared with patients with blunt or other trauma (for example, motor vehicle and motorcycle accidents or stab wounds) and those with elective conditions (for example, arthritis, tendinitis, or nerve compression)? (2) Are PTSD scores correlated with pain scores in patients with GSW trauma, those with non-GSW trauma, and patients with elective orthopaedic symptoms? We performed a retrospective study of adults older than 18 years of age presenting to an orthopaedic clinic over an 8-month period between August 2021 and May 2022. All patients presenting to the clinic were approached for inclusion (2034 patients), and 630 new or postoperative patients answered study surveys as part of routine care. Patients were divided into three cohorts based on the orthopaedic condition with which they presented, whether gunshot trauma, blunt trauma, or elective orthopaedic symptoms. Overall, the results from 415 patients were analyzed, including 212 patients with elective orthopaedic symptoms, 157 patients with non-GSW trauma, and 46 patients with GSW trauma. Clinical data including demographic information were collected at the time of appointment and abstracted along with results from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, short screening questionnaire, which uses a 7-item scale scored from 0 to 7 (with higher scores representing worse symptoms), and from the numeric rating scale for pain (range 0 to 10). Both questionnaires were routinely administered by medical assistants at patient intake. The proportions of patients completing PTSD scoring were 45% (95) in the elective group, 74% (116) in the group with non-GSW trauma, and 85% (39) in the group with GSW trauma (p = 0.01). We compared the PTSD scores across the three groups and then dichotomized the scores as a negative versus positive screening result at a value of ≥ 4 with further comparative analysis. The correlation between pain and PTSD scores was also evaluated. Patients with GSW trauma had higher mean ± SD PTSD scores compared with those who had non-GSW trauma (4.87 ± 4.05 versus 1.75 ± 2.72, mean difference 3.21 [95% CI 1.99 to 4.26]; p < 0.001) and those who presented with elective conditions (4.87 ± 4.05 versus 0.49 ± 1.04, mean difference 4.38 [95% CI 3.50 to 5.26]; p < 0.001). When dichotomized for positive or negative PTSD screening results, patients with GSW trauma had a higher risk of having PTSD (64% [25 of 39]) compared with patients with non-GSW trauma (27% [31 of 116], relative risk 2.40 [95% CI 1.64 to 3.51]; p < 0.001) and compared with patients with elective conditions (4% [4 of 95], relative risk 15.22 [95% CI 5.67 to 40.87]; p < 0.001). Pain scores were correlated with PTSD scores only for patients with non-GSW trauma (ρ = 0.37; p < 0.0001). No correlation with pain scores was present for patients with GSW (ρ = 0.24; p = 0.16) or patients with elective conditions (ρ = -0.04; p = 0.75). In an orthopaedic clinic population, the prevalence of positive screening for PTSD was highest in the population sustaining gunshot trauma as compared with blunt or other trauma and elective orthopaedic conditions. Interestingly, pain scores correlated with PTSD screening only in the patients with non-GSW trauma. These differences suggest a substantial difference in the populations at risk of PTSD after trauma. Overall, the psychological impacts of gun trauma are poorly understood. The next step would be to prospectively study the differences and timelines of PTSD screening in patients with GSW trauma in comparison with patients with blunt or other trauma to better define the treatment needs in this population. Level III, prognostic study.

Prolonged Opioid Use and Associated Factors After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Tibial Shaft Fractures.

The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to determine the rate of prolonged opioid use and identify associated risk factors after perioperative opioid exposure for tibial shaft fracture surgery. We used the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database (IBM) to identify patients 18 to 64 years old who filled a peri-operative opioid prescription after open reduction and internal fixation of a tibial shaft fracture from January 2016 to June 2020. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors (eg, demographics, comorbidities, medications) associated with prolonged opioid use (ie, filling an opioid prescription 91 to 180 days postoperatively); adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were reported. The rate of prolonged opioid use was 10.5% (n=259/2475) in the full cohort and 6.1% (n=119/1958) in an opioid-naive subgroup. In the full cohort, factors significantly associated with increased odds of prolonged use included preoperative opioid use (OR, 4.76; 95% CI, 3.60-6.29; P<.001); perioperative oral morphine equivalents in the 4th (vs 1st) quartile (OR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.75-4.09; P<.001); age (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02-1.04; P<.001); and alcohol or substance-related disorder (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.15-2.40; P=.01). Patients in the Northeast and North Central (vs South) regions had decreased odds of prolonged use (OR, 0.61-0.69; P=.02-.04). When removing preoperative use, findings were similar in the opioid-naive subgroup. Prolonged opioid use is not uncommon in this orthopedic trauma population, with the strongest risk factor being preoperative opioid use. Nevertheless, shared risk factors exist between the opioid-naive and opioid-tolerant subgroups that can guide clinical decision-making. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(4):e188-e196.].

Strategies to increase response rates for patient‐reported outcome measures in orthopaedics: A scoping review

AbstractPurposeLow response rates remain a challenge for collecting patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs). This review aimed to identify and synthesise the strategies to increase PROM response rates in orthopaedic populations or settings that have been evaluated in the peer‐reviewed literature. Such a synthesis can guide future research and provide a structure for future implementation evaluations.MethodsWe completed a scoping review of English‐language articles in peer‐reviewed journals published from 1 January 2013 to 30 October 2023 in PubMed, Embase via Ovid, and Scopus. Eligible articles had a primary focus on patients with orthopaedic conditions and/or described activities in an orthopaedic practice setting and had to present numeric data on response rates for (a) two or more strategies or (b) before and after a specific strategy.ResultsAcross 27 papers, the largest category of evaluated strategies was ‘administration modality’ (n = 16). Other categories of strategies included ‘administration setting’ (n = 5), ‘manual effort’ (n = 5), ‘reminder’ (n = 4), ‘invitation’ (n = 3), ‘automation’ (n = 3), ‘education and training’ (n = 3), ‘measure characteristic’ (n = 3), ‘incentive’ (n = 2), and ‘administration frequency’ (n = 1). Eighteen of 23 studies that completed significance testing identified a significant difference in favour of an intervention, but there were mixed findings across studies within categories.ConclusionOpportunities exist to evaluate categories of strategies beyond the technical modality of administration (e.g. paper vs. electronic) to increase response rates. Additionally, the review findings highlight the need for increased standardisation of terminology and improved specification of strategies and response rate outcomes for systematic implementation evaluations and cross‐institutional comparisons.

Venous thromboembolism testing practices after orthopaedic trauma: prophylaxis regimen does not influence testing patterns.

To determine venous thromboembolism (VTE) testing patterns in an orthopaedic trauma population and to evaluate for differences in VTE surveillance by prophylaxis regimen through a secondary analysis of the ADAPT trial. Prospective randomized trial. Level I trauma center. Three hundred twenty-nine adult (18 years and older) trauma patients presenting with an operative extremity fracture proximal to the metatarsals/carpals or any pelvic or acetabular fracture requiring VTE prophylaxis. VTE imaging studies recorded within 90 days post injury. Percentage of patients tested for VTE were compared between treatment groups using Fisher's exact test. Subsequently, multivariable regression was used to determine patient factors significantly associated with risk of receiving a VTE imaging study. Sixty-seven patients (20.4%) had VTE tests ordered during the study period. Twenty (29.9%) of these 67 patients with ordered VTE imaging tests had a positive finding. No difference in proportion of patients tested for VTE by prophylaxis regimen (18.8% on aspirin vs. 22.0% on LMWH, P = 0.50) was observed. Factors associated with increased likelihood of VTE testing included White race (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.61, 95% CI: 1.26-5.42), increased Injury Severity Score (aOR for every 1-point increase: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.05-1.15), and lower socioeconomic status based on the Area Deprivation Index (aOR for every 10-point increase: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.00-1.30). VTE surveillance did not significantly differ by prophylaxis regimen. Patient demographic factors including race, injury severity, and socioeconomic status were associated with differences in VTE surveillance. Level I, Therapeutic.

Patient-reported barriers for adherence to prophylactic enoxaparin after orthopedic trauma surgery

IntroductionVenous thromboembolism following orthopedic trauma surgery remains prevalent despite prophylaxis being a standard of care. Enoxaparin injection is a commonly utilized prophylaxis regimen among high-risk patients. Patient-reported rates of nonadherence and barriers to enoxaparin use are not described in the literature. A better understanding of these barriers and their impact on adherence to post-discharge prophylaxis regimens may shed light on persistent outcomes gaps. Materials and methodsSemi-structured interviews were administered to adult patients prescribed prophylactic enoxaparin and presenting to orthopedic surgery outpatient clinic at an urban level 1 trauma center for a post-operative appointment following traumatic injury from April to July 2023. Patients self-reported their age, gender, race, and mobility. Inductive thematic analysis with three-reviewer consensus identified common barriers among responses. Adherence rates were calculated by dividing patients’ estimated number of missed doses over total prescribed doses at the point of inquiry. ResultsWe identified 154 eligible patients through chart review, and 50 enrolled and interviewed. Participants had a mean age of 37 years. Of 50 participants, 20 identified as female; 25 identified as Black or African American, 16 as White, 5 as Hispanic, 2 as Asian, and 2 as multiracial. Twenty-one participants were non-ambulatory at time of interview. Mean and median patient-reported adherence were 64.5 % (SD 35.5) and 70.5 % (IQR 33–100) respectively. Five patients reported complete nonadherence, while 17 patients reported perfect adherence. Every participant reporting complete nonadherence identified as Black or African American, as compared to 8 out of 17 reporting perfect adherence. Despite acknowledging a twice-daily prescription, 17 patients reported once-daily rather than twice-daily use. Inductive thematic analysis revealed the following six barriers to prophylaxis adherence (number of participants reporting): Inconvenience (18 patients), Pain (16), Fear (12), Acquisition (7), Bruising (7), and Mechanism (7). Altogether, 40 patients endorsed at least one barrier to adherence. Discussion & conclusionsMost patients face barriers to adherence with post-discharge prophylactic enoxaparin, and the resultant rates of adherence are low. This may contribute to persistent outcomes gaps in the orthopedic trauma population despite prophylaxis standards. Changes in prescribing patterns and patient engagement techniques may improve post-operative thromboembolic outcomes.

Rehabilitation Techniques for Adults Undergoing External Fixation Treatment for Lower Limb Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

External fixation devices are commonly used in orthopaedic surgery to manage a range of pathologies. In this patient population, there is currently no consensus on optimal rehabilitation techniques. There exists a large variation in practice, with a limited understanding of how these affect treatment outcomes. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic review was conducted of Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), MEDLINE, PEDro, and COCHRANE databases, grey literature sources and forward and backward searching of included articles. Studies were selected following rigorous screening with predefined inclusion criteria. Data quality was assessed using validated appraisal tools. Articles were synthesised by rehabilitation type and descriptive analysis was subsequently performed. From 1,156 articles identified, 18 were eligible for inclusion. The overall quality was low, with clinical commentaries and case studies being the most common study type. Studies were synthesised by rehabilitation type, the most common themes being gait re-education, strengthening, therapy-assisted, active exercises and weight-bearing exercises. There is a lack of high-quality evidence to support meaningful recommendations and guide rehabilitation practices for this patient cohort. Further research for patients being treated in external fixation, especially related to the potential effects of physical rehabilitation on bone healing, return of strength, mobility and independent function is likely to have transferability within wider orthopaedic populations. This systematic review is unable to provide clinical recommendations due to the poor quality of the available literature. However, it is hoped this paper will provide a foundation for further research to improve rehabilitation for patients being treated with external fixation. Pawson JR, Church D, Fletcher J, et al. Rehabilitation Techniques for Adults Undergoing External Fixation Treatment for Lower Limb Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2024;19(1):45-55.

Anterior Minimally Invasive Approach (AMIS) for Total Hip Arthroplasty: Analysis of the First 1000 Consecutive Patients Operated at a High Volume Center.

(1) Background: Direct anterior approach (DAA) has recently acquired popularity through improvements such as the anterior minimally invasive surgical technique (AMIS). This retrospective study examines the first 1000 consecutive THAs performed utilizing the AMIS approach in a high-volume center between 2012 and 2017. (2) Methods: 1000 consecutive THAs performed at a single institution utilizing the AMIS approach were retrospectively analyzed with a minimum five-year follow-up. Full evaluation of demographic information, clinical parameters, intraoperative complications, and radiological examinations are reported. (3) Results: Overall complication rate was 9.4% (94/1000), including 8 dislocations, 57 femoral-cutaneous nerve injuries, 12 intraoperative femoral fractures, 9 infections and 8 leg length discrepancy. Implant survival rates were 98.5% at 1 year, 97.5% at 3 years, 97% at 5 years, and 95.3% at 7 years. Causes of failure included periprosthetic fractures (0.8%), implant dislocations (0.6%), septic loosening (0.5%), aseptic mobilizations (0.2%), and symptomatic limb length discrepancies (0.2%). (4) Conclusions: Controversies persist around the direct anterior approach (DAA) for THA, primarily regarding the increased complications rate during the learning curve. However, this study advocates for widespread adoption of the DAA approach. The results demonstrate acceptable complication rates and remarkable functional outcomes, affirming its viability in the broader orthopedic patient population.

Capability After Total Knee Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis Is Strongly Associated With Preoperative Symptoms of Depression.

Primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aims to improve the level of capability (ability to perform valued life activities) associated with knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, some evidence suggests a substantial proportion of patients remain dissatisfied with their outcomes after this procedure. We sought to better understand the association between mental health, specifically symptoms of depression, with postoperative outcomes. Symptoms of depression are shown to be common among orthopaedic populations in general and can be briefly and conveniently evaluated using the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) in a less burdensome manner compared with longer mental health surveys. This study assesses the association between preoperative depressive symptoms (PHQ-2) and levels of capability at 6 weeks and 6 months after TKA. We conducted a prospective cohort study involving 114 patients with knee OA across five clinics in California and Texas scheduled for TKA. Participants completed a preoperative PHQ-2 and Knee Injury and OA Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR) survey at 6 weeks and 6 months post-TKA. We analyzed these data using bivariate and multivariable regression. Preoperative PHQ-2 scores were significantly associated with lower KOOS JR scores at 6 weeks and 6 months post-TKA. Latino/Hispanic race was also associated with lower KOOS JR scores at 6 weeks. The association between preoperative depressive symptoms and level of capability after TKA were more pronounced at 6 months compared with 6 weeks. Preoperative symptoms of depression are strongly associated with reduced capability after TKA and can be screened for using the PHQ-2-a brief tool that can be feasibly incorporated into clinical workflows. User-friendly assessment of depressive symptoms can assist orthopaedic surgeons in identifying and addressing mental health at the outset during the management of knee OA.

Markerless motion capture provides repeatable gait outcomes in patients with knee osteoarthritis

Motion analysis has seen minimal adoption for orthopaedic clinical assessments. Markerless motion capture solutions, namely Theia3D, address limitations of previous methods and provide gait outcomes that are robust to clothing choice and repeatable in healthy adults. Repeatability in orthopaedic populations has not been investigated and is important for clinical utility and adoption. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the repeatability of Theia3D for gait analysis in a knee osteoarthritis population. Ten orthopaedic patients with knee osteoarthritis underwent gait analysis on three visits, with an average of 8 days between. Participants were recorded during one-minute overground walking trials at self-selected typical and fast speeds by 8 synchronized video cameras. Video data were processed using Theia3D. Intraclass correlations were used to examine the repeatability of temporal distance metrics as well as segment lengths of the underlying kinematic model. Inter-trial and inter-session variability of lower extremity joint angles were estimated for each point of the gait cycle. Intraclass correlations were greater than 0.98 for all temporal distance metrics for both speeds. Lower body segment lengths had intraclass correlations above 0.90. Participant average joint angle waveforms displayed consistent patterns between visits. The average inter-trial and inter-session variability in joint angles across speeds were 1.17 and 1.45 degrees, respectively. The variability in joint angles between visits was less than typically reported for marker-based methods. Gait outcomes measured with Theia3D were highly repeatable in patients with knee osteoarthritis providing further validation for its use in clinical assessment and longitudinal studies.

Radiographic Thigh Muscle Measurements Are a Reliable Predictor of Psoas Area and Sarcopenia.

Sarcopenia is associated with falls, fractures, postoperative complications such as periprosthetic joint infections and dislocations, and early mortality. Although cross-sectional imaging is currently used to diagnose sarcopenia, inexpensive and widely available screening tests are needed. The goal of this study was to investigate whether measurements of thigh muscles made on radiographs can predict psoas muscle area and the presence of sarcopenia as determined on computed tomography (CT) scans. A retrospective radiographic review was performed to measure thigh muscle area in the coronal and sagittal planes using the differential in soft-tissue attenuation. Psoas muscle area on CT at L3 and L4 served as the gold standard for the diagnosis of sarcopenia. The correlation between thigh muscle and psoas muscle areas was determined, and multivariable models were developed to identify predictors of psoas muscle area and sarcopenia. Four hundred and fourteen patients (252 male, 162 female) were identified. Seventy-six (18.4%) of the patients had an L4 psoas muscle area below the sex-specific cutoff value for sarcopenia. Patients with sarcopenia on abdominal CT had significantly smaller thigh muscle measurements on all radiographic views. The mean and standard deviation of the thigh muscle measurements were determined for the entire cohort and for patients with sarcopenia, as well as for adults aged 18 to 40 years without sarcopenia to provide normative reference values. The intraclass correlation coefficients were >0.8 for all radiographic measurements. The anteroposterior-view measurement of thigh muscle width and lateral-view measurement of quadriceps height were identified as independent predictors of both psoas muscle area and sarcopenia. Measurements of thigh muscle size made on radiographs can predict both psoas muscle area and sarcopenia. These measurements are a reliable and readily available screening tool to aid in the diagnosis and treatment of sarcopenia in the orthopaedic population. Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Health Disparities in Patients With Musculoskeletal Injuries: Food Insecurity Is a Common and Clinically Challenging Problem.

Health disparities have important effects on orthopaedic patient populations. Socioeconomic factors and poor nutrition have been shown to be associated with an increased risk of complications such as infection in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. Currently, there are limited published data on how food insecurity is associated with medical and surgical complications. We sought to (1) determine the percentage of patients who experience food insecurity in an orthopaedic trauma clinic at a large Level 1 trauma center, (2) identify demographic and clinical factors associated with food insecurity, and (3) identify whether there are differences in the risk of complications and reoperations between patients who experience food insecurity and patients who are food-secure. This was a cross-sectional study using food insecurity screening surveys, which were obtained at an orthopaedic trauma clinic at our Level 1 trauma center. All patients 18 years and older who were seen for an initial evaluation or follow-up for fracture care between November 2022 and February 2023 were considered for inclusion in this study. For inclusion in this study, the patient had to have surgical treatment of their fracture and have completed at least one food insecurity screening survey. Ninety-eight percent (121 of 123) of patients completed the screening survey during the study period. Data for 21 patients were excluded because of nonoperative treatment of their fracture, nonfracture-related care, impending metastatic fracture care, and patients who had treatment at an outside facility and were transferring their care. This led to a study group of 100 patients with orthopaedic trauma. The mean age was 51 years, and 51% (51 of 100) were men. The mean length of follow-up available for patients in the study was 13 months from the initial clinic visit. Patient demographics, hospital admission data, and outcome data were collected from the electronic medical records. Patients were divided into two cohorts: food-secure versus food-insecure. Patients were propensity score matched for adjusted analysis. A total of 37% of the patients in this study (37 of 100) screened positive for food insecurity during the study period. Patients with food insecurity were more likely to have a higher BMI than patients with food security (32 kg/m 2 compared with 28 kg/m 2 ; p = 0.009), and they were more likely not to have healthcare insurance or to have Medicaid (62% [23 of 37] compared with 30% [19 of 63]; p = 0.003). After propensity matching for age, gender, ethnicity, current substance use, Charleston comorbidity index, employment status, open fracture, and length of stay, food insecurity was associated with a higher percentage of superficial infections (13% [4 of 31] compared with 0% [0 of 31]; p = 0.047). There were no differences between the groups in the risk of reoperation, deep infection, and nonunion. Food insecurity is common among patients who have experienced orthopaedic trauma, and patients who have it may be at increased risk of superficial infections after surgery. Future research in this area should focus on defining these health disparities further and interventions that could address them. Level III, therapeutic study.