Orthodontic Brackets Research Articles

Photo-disinfection of orthodontic brackets contaminated with <i>Lactobacillus acidophilus</i> with blue laser

Decontamination of teeth with Chlorhexidine (CHX) in the treatment of dental disease is associated with some concerns. The objective of the current study was to ascertain whether the Blue Diode Laser (BDL), as a new approach in combination with riboflavin and curcumin as photosensitizers, would have any impact on the number of Lactobacillus acidophilus around orthodontic brackets. A total of 36 orthodontic brackets were contaminated with L. acidophilus and categorized into six different groups, including the negative control, riboflavin alone or riboflavin + BDL with a radiant power of 500 mW, and curcumin alone or curcumin + BDL with a radiant power of 500 mW, and 0.2% CHX as positive control. Orthodontic brackets were irradiated with a BDL (wavelength of 450 nm) and radiant exposure of 30 J/cm2 for 30 s. Colony-forming units per milliliter (CFUs/ml) were determined. One-way Analysis Of Variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post-hoc tests were performed to compare CFU/ml between groups. All groups were better at eliminating L. acidophilus around orthodontic brackets than the negative control group, but this was not significant for riboflavin alone. The curcumin groups were more effective than the riboflavin groups at reducing CFU/ml of L. acidophilus. In addition, CHX was able to completely eliminate the colonies of L. acidophilus (p <0.0001). This study showed that curcumin and riboflavin plus BDL significantly reducedthe amounts of L. acidophilus around the orthodontic brackets.

An in vitro study of orthodontic brackets bonded to transition dental zirconia: Shear bond strength, adhesive remnant index, and surface irregularities

Orthodontic treatment often involves bonding brackets to teeth, and the protocols for natural enamel differ from those for prosthodontically restored teeth. With the rising number of adult orthodontic patients, many present with zirconia crowns. This study aimed to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of ceramic orthodontic brackets bonded to transition dental zirconia, which combines 3Y-TZP and 5Y-TZP powders. Ninety zirconia substrates were divided into three groups (n=30) based on transition zirconia brands (3M ESPE Lava™ Plus, Cercon® ht ML, and Katana™ Zirconia UTML) and bonded with ceramic brackets (CHIC Ceramic Roth Maxillary and Symetri Clear) using 3M™ Transbond™ XT. A control group used traditional zirconia and metal brackets. Surface treatments included 50-micron aluminium oxide abrasion and Z-Prime™ Plus application. SBS was tested post-thermocycling. Adhesive Resin Index (ARI) was scored and surface roughness was evaluated pre- and post-bonding. Group 1 (3M ESPE Lava™ Plus with CHIC Ceramic Roth Maxillary brackets) had a significantly lower SBS (mean 13.27MPa) compared to the other groups, which all had SBS values above 18.80MPa (P≤.023). Group 2 (3M ESPE Lava™ Plus with Symetri™ Clear) demonstrated a significantly higher mean ARI compared to the control group (Cercon® XT with Victory Series™ Roth), (P=.027). Additionally, significant changes in surface roughness were observed in Groups B (Cercon® ht ML) (P=.008) and C (Katana™ Zirconia UTML) (P=.016). This study determined that the shear bond strength of various transitional zirconia substrates with ceramic brackets exceeded the clinically acceptable SBS levels. The combination of 3M ESPE Lava™ Plus and Symetri™ Clear exhibited significant variation in ARI. Additionally, significant surface irregularities were observed in 3M ESPE Lava™ Plus and Cercon® ht ML following air abrasion, compared to other transitional zirconia brands.

Effect of different surface conditioning methods and low pH solutions on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to newly introduced CAD/CAM materials

AimTo evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of ceramic and metallic orthodontic brackets bonded to lithium disilicate ceramics or hybrid ceramics and subjected to different surface conditioning treatments. Materials and methodsIn total, 300 specimens were fabricated from GC LiSi (lithium disilicate) and GC Cerasmart (hybrid) ceramic blocks. The specimens were divided into four groups according to the following surface treatments: hydrofluoric acid (HF); sandblasting with 50 μm aluminum oxide; Monobond Etch and Prime; and erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er-YAG) laser. Metal (Victory Series) and ceramic (Clarity) brackets were bonded using an orthodontic adhesive resin (Transbond XT; 3M Unitek, CA, USA). The specimens were then stored in three different mediums (artificial saliva, mouth rinse, and gastric juice) and thermocycled. An SBS test was performed after 1 week. The surface morphology was examined after the conditioning treatments using a scanning electron microscope. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance, t-test, and Duncan test. ResultsThe SBS data revealed that the type of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) block and surface conditioning method significantly affected the SBS. The highest SBS was recorded (10.112 MPa) for the HF-treated hybrid ceramic blocks stored in the saliva medium, while the lowest SBS (1.862 MPa) was reported for the Er-YAG laser-treated lithium disilicate ceramic blocks stored in the gastric juice medium. GC Cerasmart exhibited better bond strength than that of GC LiSi; however, no significant difference was observed between the ceramic and metal brackets. ConclusionThe CAD/CAM material, surface conditioning method, and medium affect the SBS.

Effects of Adding Tricalcium Silicate Nanoparticles to the Universal G2 Bond Adhesive as Self-Etch Mode on the Shear Bond Strength to the Orthodontic Bracket.

This study investigated the effects of adding tricalcium silicate nanoparticles (TCSNp) to the universal G2 bond adhesive (G2BU) in self-etch (SE) mode on shear bond strength (SBS) to orthodontic brackets, cytotoxicity, and degree of conversion (DC). A total of 176 human teeth were divided into four groups based on TCSNp concentration in G2BU adhesive: 0% (control), 1%, 3%, and 5%. The G2BU adhesive consists of a hydrophilic primer (P) and a hydrophobic bonding agent (2B). TCSNp were added to the 2B component by mixing 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 g of TCSNp with 9.9, 9.7, and 9.5 g of 2B, respectively. SBS was assessed after 24 h of water storage and 5000 thermocycles using a universal testing machine. Cytotoxicity was evaluated using the MTT assay on rat embryo fibroblast cells, and DC was measured using fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. Statistical analysis included one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test, with significance set at p < 0.05. After 24 h, mean SBS values were 15.58 MPa (control), 13.66 MPa (1% TCSNp), 15.99 MPa (3% TCSNp), and 12.04 MPa (5% TCSNp). After 5000 thermocycles, SBS values decreased to 12.91 MPa (control), 12.42 MPa (1% TCSNp), 11.11 MPa (3% TCSNp), and 10.21 MPa (5% TCSNp). ANOVA showed significant differences between groups (p < 0.05), except between the control and 3% TCSNp groups. Cell viability increased with higher TCSNp concentrations, with significant differences at 72 h between control and 5% TCSNp groups (p = 0.014). Mean DC values were 51.66% (control), 49.33% (1% TCSNp), 49.66% (3% TCSNp), and 48% (5% TCSNp). ANOVA indicated no significant differences between groups. Adding TCSNp to G2BU in SE mode maintains clinically acceptable SBS levels and enhances cytocompatibility. Higher TCSNp concentrations may reduce SBS and DC slightly. Further studies are needed to evaluate long-term effects.

Orthodontic bracket failure rate after bonding with and without primer – A systematic review and meta-analysis

To compare the difference in failure rates between orthodontic brackets bonded with light-cured primer and those bonded without primer. An electronic search of five databases and additional manual searches were performed until January 2024. Randomized and prospective non-randomized controlled trials directly comparing the bracket failure rate with and without primer. Two authors independently collected study characteristics by extracting outcome data from pre-defined sheets. After evaluating the risk of bias, the odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with random-effects models. Four studies were evaluated using qualitative and quantitative analysis. The analysis included data from 199 patients (1691 brackets with primer and 1646 brackets without primer). Random effects of pooled meta-analysis demonstrated statistically significant differences in the bracket failure rates (odds ratio=1.50, p=0.010, [95% CI 1.10 to 2.05]). The risk of failure was 1.5 times greater when brackets were bonded without primer. The results should be interpreted in the context of the limited sample size, even though there was a substantial difference in the failure rates of brackets with and without a primer, favouring the use of a primer. Furthermore, the validity of the finding may be limited by potential variables such as patient factors, clinician expertise, and isolation. More extensive research is required to validate these findings (PROSPERO CRD42024593134).

Effectiveness of high-frequency vibration, cotton rolls and elastomeric wafers in alleviating debonding pain of orthodontic metal brackets: a randomized clinical trial

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of different pain mitigation methods during orthodontic debonding and to evaluate pain sensitivity across various regions of the dentition. A total of 144 participants (50 males and 94 females) with metal brackets were randomly assigned to one of four groups: High-Frequency Vibration (V), Cotton Roll (CR), Elastomeric Wafer (EW), and Open Mouth group (OM). Pain levels were measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) across different sextants of the dentition. The Kruskal-Wallis test and post hoc analyses were conducted to compare VAS scores between groups. The Mann-Whitney test was used to analyse sex-based differences. The V group, utilizing high-frequency vibration, had the lowest total VAS score, indicating superior pain relief compared to CR, EW, and OM groups. No significant difference was observed between the CR and EW groups. Median VAS scores were highest in the lower front sextant, followed by the upper front sextants, and lowest in the posterior regions, indicating greater pain sensitivity in the anterior regions during debonding. High-frequency vibration was the most effective method for reducing pain during orthodontic debonding, particularly in the anterior dental regions. Both CR and EW methods were also effective but to a lesser extent. These findings suggest that high-frequency vibration could significantly improve patient comfort during orthodontic procedures. Utilizing high-frequency vibration for orthodontic debonding can enhance patient comfort, especially in the more sensitive anterior dental regions, thereby potentially improving treatment compliance and experience.Trial registration: NCT05904587.

The Biofilm Removal and Bactericidal Effect of an 810-nm High-Power Laser on an Orthodontic Bracket Surface: An In Vitro Study.

Objective: The present study aimed to analyze the biofilm removal and bactericidal effect of laser treatment alone and laser combined with ultrasonic scaling on orthodontic brackets. It also assessed whether the use of a laser can improve the efficiency of biofilm removal and bactericidal effect compared with traditional ultrasonic instrumentation. Background Data: Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) can lead to white spots and dental caries. Orthodontic brackets make teeth cleaning more difficult, and biofilms or bacteria on the surface of brackets worsen the oral environment, which may cause some oral diseases. Laser can be used for biofilm removal and killing bacteria on the surface of an object through thermal, photochemical, and pressure effects, which is widely used in the treatment of oral diseases. Methods: A total of 600 mandibular incisor brackets were collected for this study. Among these, 320 unused brackets were used for the S. mutans crystal violet assay (n = 160) and for S. mutans live/dead bacterial staining (n = 160). Another 280 brackets, obtained from patients who had undergone therapy for over two years, were used for the mature multispecies biofilms removal assay (n = 120) and multispecies bacterial live/dead bacterial staining (n = 160). Ultrasonic scaling, laser, and laser combined with ultrasonic scaling were applied to the labial surface of brackets covered by S. mutans biofilm or mature multispecies biofilms. Specifically, we used the following three methods: ultrasonic scaling for 10 sec without laser; 810-nm laser (Doctor Smile, Italy, LA5D0 001.1) with 0.3-mm spot size at total 21.2 kJ/cm2 for 10 sec; and 810-nm laser at total 10.6 kJ/cm2 for 5 sec, followed by ultrasonic scaling for 5 sec. The 810-nm diode laser removed biofilms with a power of 1.5 W and a power density of 2.12 kW/cm2. The S. mutans biofilm was examined using crystal violet assay, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used for mature multispecies biofilms to evaluate the effect of the three methods on biofilm removal. Live/dead bacterial staining was used to examine the bactericidal effect on remaining biofilms by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Results: For S. mutans biofilm, the optical density (OD) value and live/dead bacterial ratio in the laser and the laser combined with ultrasonic scaling groups were significantly lower than those in the ultrasonic scaling group (p < 0.05); moreover, the OD value and the live/dead bacterial ratio in laser treatment combined with ultrasonic scaling and laser treatment alone showed no significant difference (p > 0.05). For mature multispecies biofilms, the percentage of biofilm coverage after treatment was higher in the laser group than in the ultrasonic scaling group (p < 0.05) and lower in the laser combined with ultrasonic scaling group than in the ultrasonic scaling group (p < 0.05), and live/dead bacterial staining showed that laser treatment alone killed the most bacteria, followed by laser treatment combined with ultrasonic scaling, while ultrasonic scaling alone seldom killed bacteria. Conclusions: Laser treatment alone has a better bactericidal effect and can also remove more S. mutans biofilm than ultrasonic scaling alone, but it fails to remove more mature multispecies biofilms. Laser treatment combined with ultrasonic scaling can remove more S. mutans biofilm and mature multispecies biofilms than ultrasonic scaling alone and also has a better bactericidal effect than ultrasonic scaling alone on a bracket surface.

Evaluation of the Conventional Acid-Etching System and the Self-Etching Primer in Bonding Metallic Orthodontic Brackets: An In-Vitro and In-Vivo Study.

This study aimed to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of enamel-bonded orthodontic brackets with the conventional acid etching (CAE) system and the self-etching primer (SEP)in vitro and to compare the clinical performance of both systems when used in the treatment of malocclusion patients. In the first part of the study, 40 extracted human premolars were randomly divided into two groups containing 20 teeth. The first group (the conventional enamel etching group) employed37% phosphoric acid before bonding the metallic brackets (0.022-inch slot, MBT prescription, American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, WI, USA). The etching system wasTetric 5th (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein). The second group used a SEP (Sep Tetric 7th, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) to bond the same brackets. In the first part of the study, SBS was evaluated, followed by the adhesive remnant index (ARI) assessment. The second part of the study (i.e., the clinical part) assessed a cohort of 30 patients during a 6-month observation period. The upper 10 teeth (from the second premolar on the right side to the second on the right side) were bonded using the chosen method for each patient in the clinical assessment. That is, 150 teeth in each group were evaluated regarding the failure rate. The ARI was assessed for those teeth that lost their brackets. The mean SBS was greater in the SEP group compared to the CAE group (17.93 MPa and 16.60 MPa, respectively; P = 0.014). The difference was not statistically significant. Conversely, the failure rate was lower in the CAE group compared to the SEP group, with a failure rate of 6% and 14.7%, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (P = 0.014). However, the ARI showed no statistically significant difference in in-vivo and in-vitro analyses, as most bracket failures were at the adhesive level. Laboratory results showed no statistical difference in the SBS mean values between the two groups. Clinically, the SEP group showed a greater failure rate than the CAE group, but both failure rates in the two groups were within the clinically acceptable range. The ARI did not show any difference between the two groups in terms of the failure site when the evaluation was conducted in vivo and in vitro, as most of the areas of failure were concentrated in the material itself.

Comparative Analysis of Shear Bond Strength in Orthodontic Brackets Between Milled and 3D-Printed Definitive CAD/CAM Restorations

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different surface treatment methods on the shear bond strength (SBS) of metal brackets bonded to two types of CAD/CAM composite restorations: milled and 3D-printed. Materials and Methods: A total of 160 flat-shaped specimens (10 × 10 × 2 mm3) were prepared from four different CAD/CAM composites; two milled (Lava Ultimate™ [LU] and Grandio™ [GR]) and two 3D-printed (Crowntec™ [CT] and C&amp;B Permanent™ [CB]). These specimens underwent thermocycling (5000 cycles at 5–55 °C), then were categorized based on the surface treatment into four groups (n = 10): Group C (control, no surface treatment), Group HF (treated with 9.6% hydrofluoric acid), Group DB (mechanical roughening by a diamond bur), and Group SB (sandblasting using aluminum oxide). Metal brackets were bonded using Transbond XT Primer and universal adhesive, stored in artificial saliva for 24 h, then thermocycled again. Shear bond strength (SBS) was tested using a universal testing machine until bracket debonding occurred. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was assessed using a stereomicroscope to quantify the residual adhesive following debonding. Result: Regarding material, GR and LU restorations had significantly higher SBS values compared to CT and CB, ranging from 13.90 MPa to 20.35 MPa. Regarding surface treatment, SB and HF groups showed significantly higher SBS values. The ARI scores showed different adhesive modes of failure, with higher instances of scores 0 and 1, which indicate no or minimal adhesive remaining. Conclusions: Both milled and 3D-printed materials had adequate SBS for clinical use, with milled materials showing superior results. Surface treatments like sandblasting and HF significantly improved bond strength, with adhesive failure being common.

In vitro determination of genotoxicity and cytotoxicity induced by stainless steel brackets with and without surface coating in cultures of oral mucosal cells

BackgroundOrthodontics is a speciality of dentistry that uses a plethora of devices made from myriad materials to manage various malocclusions. Prolonged contact of orthodontic appliances with oral tissues can lead to cellular damage, highlighting the need for biocompatible materials to mitigate health risks.ObjectivesTo analyze the genotoxicity and cytotoxicity produced by metal brackets and coated metallic brackets with polymeric and nanoparticle coatings in oral mucosal cells.Materials & methodsThe current study compares the toxicity of 3 different types of orthodontic brackets with control groups of oral mucosal cells. Each of the three treatment groups consisted of 10 samples of orthodontic brackets: stainless steel brackets(Group 1), nanoparticle-coated brackets(Group 2), and polymeric-coated brackets(Group 3) exposed to corrosion eluates employing an oral biomimicry model. Two types of oral mucosal cells- Human Gingival Fibroblasts and Buccal Epithelial Cells were used to study the cytotoxic and/or genotoxic effects of the elutes. Intergroup comparisons were conducted using one-way analysis of variance, while scanning electron microscopy evaluated surface characteristic.ResultsThe interaction between metal ions and oral mucosal cells showed no statistically significant difference for toxicity assays between the three groups(p > 0.005). However, polymeric and nanoparticle-coated groups showed reduced cellular differentiation when compared with conventional stainless-steel brackets.ConclusionThis in-vitro study shows that polymeric or nanoparticle coating of conventional metal brackets aids in enhancing corrosion-resistant characteristics of orthodontic appliances and reduces the toxic oral environment created by metal release in the oral cavity.

Comparison of Friction Resistance Between Different Bracket Systems: An In Vitro Study

Introduction The efficiency of tooth movement associated with orthodontic sliding mechanics can be compromised by friction between archwire and tube or bracket slot. Orthodontic brackets and archwires are important constituents of an orthodontic appliance system. Friction is an uncontrolled variable of particular interest when continuous arch techniques are used to align and move teeth by way of sliding a tube or bracket along an arch. Aim and Objectives Comparison of frictional resistance between different bracket systems of 3M and MO brands in combination with different wires of 3M, MO, and G&amp;H brands. Evaluation of frictional resistance between two different types of bracket systems and different types of wire combinations. Materials and Methods Two types of bracket systems were used: metal bracket system and ceramic bracket system (3M and MO brands). Four different orthodontic wire alloys were used: stainless steel (SS), TMA, NiTi, and CuNiTi (3M, MO, and G&amp;H brands). A rectangular block made up of self-cure acrylic resin was designed to hold the bracket during the mechanical test. Each bracket base was glued to an acrylic block with cyanoacrylate glue. The wire segment was inserted into the bracket and was ligated passively with SS ligature wire. The bracket–wire combination was submitted to mechanical tests with a universal testing machine. One end of the acrylic block was mounted to the lower grip of the universal testing machine. The free end of the archwire was fixed to the upper grip of the universal testing machine. The friction which was generated between the wire and bracket was measured under dry conditions and at room temperature. The test wire was pulled through the bracket at a speed of 0.5 cm/min. The load cell registered a maximum force level. This data was stored in the computer and was submitted to statistical analysis, and parameter tests were applied. Results The highest mean friction resistance of 5.998 N was generated by group B2-E2 (ceramic bracket – MO + TMA archwire – MO). The lowest mean friction resistance of 2.552 N was generated by group A1-C1 (metal bracket – 3M + SS wire – 3M). There was a statistically significant difference between the friction generated by the metal bracket on SS archwire and the ceramic bracket on TMA archwire regardless of 3M or MO brand material ( p value &lt; .0001) and metal bracket ( p = .0004).

Quantitative Determination of Salivary Cariogenic Bacteria in Patients With Fixed Orthodontic Appliances.

Fixed orthodontic treatment can alter the oral environment, potentially increasing cariogenic bacteria levels. This study aimed to utilize real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to quantify salivary levels of cariogenic bacteria in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. This case-control study was conducted in Erbil, Iraq, from April 2024 to August 2024. One hundred participants were included in the study by random sampling method and equally divided into two groups: case group ororthodontic group and control group. The orthodontic group included participants with fixed orthodontic brackets, while the control group included participants without current or past orthodontic treatment with matching age and sex as the orthodontic group. Data were collected via questionnaires, clinical examinations, and saliva sampling. Salivary samples were analyzed using real-time PCR to detect Streptococcus mutans (SM) and Lactobacillus (LB) spp. levels. The age ranged from 18 to 30 years, and the mean age of participants was 23.96 ± 3.64 years. No significant differences were observed between the two groups across most parameters, except in the use of fluoride therapy, where the control group demonstrated better usage (p≤0.003). Real-time PCR results indicated a significant difference in the levels of LB and SM between patients with fixed orthodontics and the control group (p≤0.001). However, no significant differences were found in decay indices such as decayed, missing, and filled teeth; decayed, missing, and filled surfaces; and plaque index in this study. The quantity and levels of LB and SM were higher in the orthodontic group compared to the control group. Despite the elevated bacterial levels in the orthodontic group, there was no significant difference in decay and plaque indices between the two groups.

The Mechanical and Clinical Properties of Customized Orthodontic Bracket Systems-A Comprehensive Review.

The rise of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) and 3D printing technologies in orthodontics has revolutionized the development of customized labial and lingual bracket systems with a variety of materials, which offer potential advantages over traditional orthodontic brackets. To highlight the current state of knowledge regarding the mechanical and clinical properties of CAD/CAM and 3D-printed custom bracket systems, we conducted a comprehensive search across the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus databases to identify relevant articles published before April 2024. Mechanical (including fracture toughness, hardness, modulus of elasticity, frictional resistance, slot accuracy, torque transmission, and shear bond strength) and clinical (including treatment efficiency and duration, cost, and comfort) properties were compared between traditional and customized orthodontic bracket systems in the current review. Our findings suggest that customized brackets have the potential to increase bracket slot precision, reduce treatment time, and offer cost-efficiency. However, it is worth noting that the advantages and disadvantages of customized bracket systems vary depending on the bracket material and the manufacturing methods, warranting comprehensively controlled investigations in the future.

The effect of addition of Bioglass 45S5 to orthodontic adhesive on shear bond strength of metal orthodontic brackets, An in vitro study

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of incorporating Bioglass (BG) 45S5 into an orthodontic adhesive on the shear bond strength (SBS) of metal orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel and the adhesive remnant index (ARI) score. Methods: In this in vitro study, 55 extracted sound premolars were randomly divided into five groups (n=11 each). Metal brackets were bonded using Ambar FGM orthodontic adhesive without BG (control group) and with BG 45S5 added at concentrations of 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% by weight in groups 2 to 5, respectively. The SBS was measured using a universal testing machine, and the ARI score was determined under a stereomicroscope at ×10 magnification. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA at a significance level of α=0.05. Results: The highest mean SBS was observed in the 20% BG Group (48.28±24.5 MPa), followed by the control group (35.81±11.11 MPa), 15% BG Group (19.64±5.42 MPa), 10% BG Group (16.3±9.33 MPa), and 5% BG Group (14.21±4.23 MPa). The SBS in the 20% BG Group was significantly higher than in the control (P=0.013), 5% BG (P=0.000), and 10% BG (P=0.002) groups. No significant differences were found in ARI scores among the groups (P=0.810). Conclusion: Adding BG 45S5 to the orthodontic adhesive at concentrations of 5%, 10%, and 15% did not significantly affect the SBS, but a 20% concentration increased the SBS. Incorporating BG at these levels does not adversely impact the SBS or ARI scores.

Comparison of static teeth exposure in different postures and its influencing factors of orthognathic surgery patients.

This study aimed to explore the differences and influencing factors of static teeth exposure in different postures of orthognathic surgery patients. A total of 148 patients were collected before or after orthognathic surgery. Photographs were taken in the upright and supine positions, and the static teeth exposure values were measured to compare whether the difference among different positions was statistically significant. The patients were classified in accordance with gender, presence or absence of orthodontic brackets, measurement time (preoperative or postoperative), and maxillary movement direction (forward or backward), and the difference of static teeth exposure was compared. The correlation between the difference of static teeth exposure and age was analyzed. The diffe-rence of static teeth exposure between the two positions was 0.99 mm±0.95 mm, which was statistically significant (P=0.000). A statistical difference in the difference of static exposure was observed between female and male (P<0.05). No statistical difference in the difference of static exposure was observed among orthodontic brackets, preoperative or postoperative time points, and maxillary movement direction. In addition, no significant correlation was found between the difference of static teeth exposure and age (r=-0.087, P=0.291). Compared with the upright position, the static exposure of teeth increased by approximately 0.99 mm in the supine position. The difference of static exposure under different postures was greater in males than in females. Furthermore, orthodontic bracket, maxillary surgery, maxillary movement direction, and age had no effect on the difference of static teeth exposure in different postures.

The effect of different enamel surface treatment methods on the shear bond strength between self-adhesive resin composite and orthodontic brackets

The effect of different enamel surface treatment methods on the shear bond strength between self-adhesive resin composite and orthodontic brackets

Impact of clear aligners and different esthetic orthodontic brackets on enamel demineralization (A comparative SEM study)

Impact of clear aligners and different esthetic orthodontic brackets on enamel demineralization (A comparative SEM study)

Effects of beverages on Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets

Effects of beverages on Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets

Comparison of Bracket Failure with Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Resin-Based Adhesive

A high strength of bonding materials is needed for orthodontic attachments to sustain therapeutic forces and patients’ masticatory habits. Objectives: To compare the bond strength of the resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) and resign based adhesive system which leads to bracket failure in orthodontic treatment (failure to bracket attachment) for the duration of 6 months at the a tertiary care hospital at Hyderabad, Sindh Pakistan. Methods: This comparative cross-sectional study involved 30 patients, each with 20 brackets, using non-probability sampling. Participants were between the ages of 13 and 30 with fully erupted permanent teeth and mild skeletal discrepancies. Quadrants were randomized, and 120 attachments were placed in total, split evenly between the two types of materials. The study involved bonding orthodontic brackets using either composite resin or RMGIC. The teeth were prepared and cleansed, and the brackets were bonded following standard procedures. Patients were monitored each month for six months (six visits) to check for any debonded or missing brackets. Chi-Square test was run to compare bracket failure between two groups. Results: There were significant differences in bracket failure rates between the composite and RMGIC sides. Composite had a lower failure rate, with 90% of brackets remaining intact compared to 63.3% with RMGIC (p=0.04). Gender comparisons showed both male and female participants experienced more failures with RMGIC than with composite, with p-values of 0.039 and 0.038, respectively. Conclusion: RMGIC could not withstand the forces experienced during fixed appliance treatment as effectively as composite resin, resulting in a higher debonding rate.

Evaluation of Etching Time Effect on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Bonded with Self-Adhesive Composite: An in-Vitro Study

Introduction: Precise acid etching of the tooth surface is a significant factor in the strength of the bracket bond. The current study aimed to determine the effect of different application times of acid etching on the shear bond strength of metallic orthodontic brackets under controlled laboratory conditions. Methods: Sixty intact premolar teeth were selected for this in-vitro study. The samples were divided into four groups based on the different acid etching times: 20, 25, 30, and 35 seconds. The teeth surfaces were etched with 37% phosphoric acid according to the specified times, and brackets were bonded to the enamel surface using GC Ortho connect composite. Shear bond strength values of the brackets was measured using a Universal Testing Machine. The amount of Adhesive Remnant Index was also observed using a stereomicroscope. Additionally, the surface roughness of the tooth enamel after bracket bonding was examined using SEM. The results related to shear bond strength were analyzed with one-way ANOVA statistical test and using SPSS version 16 software. The non-parametric Kruskal Wallis (Wallis-Kruskal) test was also used to check the frequency of ARI index. Results: The highest shear bond strength was observed at 25 seconds, and the lowest at 30 seconds. However, there was no significant difference in the shear bond strength of brackets was observed among the four groups (p=0.186). The highest ARI score was observed at 35 seconds, and the lowest at 20 seconds. No statistically significant difference was observed in the ARI scores in different groups. SEM images revealed that the enamel surface porosity was highest at 20 seconds. Conclusion: The results indicate that the shear bond strength and ARI at different acid etching times do not significantly differ. Therefore, orthodontic bracket bonding can be performed with less acid etching time.