Organ Transplant Candidates Research Articles

Validation of Serum Tetrahydrocannabinol Assay and Its Clinical Application

Abstract Background The widespread use of marijuana across all age groups in the United States, driven by the legalization of recreational and medical cannabis, has underscored the need for accurate measurement of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and its metabolites in blood specimens. This requirement spans both legal and medical contexts, prompting the development of precise diagnostic tools. Methods We developed a high-throughput liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay, utilizing a straightforward protein precipitation extraction method to quantify THC and its metabolites: THC, 11-OH-THC, THC-COOH, cannabidiol (CBD), and THC-COOH glucuronide. The assay was rigorously validated for precision, linearity, stability, carryover, and quality assurance to ensure its reliability and accuracy for clinical use. Results Precision studies demonstrated a coefficient of variation ranging from 1.7% to 4.9%. The analytical measurement range was established at 1-100 ng/mL for THC, CBD, and 11-OH-THC, 5-500 ng/mL for THC-COOH, and 10-1000 ng/mL for THC glucuronide, accommodating the broad spectrum of THC/metabolite concentrations observed in our patient cohort. Carryover from all analytes were negligible (<0.01%). Sample stability was confirmed for up to two weeks at -20°C and through three freeze-thaw cycles. Despite a median THC concentration of 5 ng/mL in a limited sample size (N=44), high concentrations of THC and its metabolites correlated with trauma-related incidents and a history of polysubstance abuse in emergency department admissions. Conclusions The LC-MS/MS assay offers superior sensitivity and specificity compared to traditional immunoassays for cannabinoid detection, effectively distinguishing between THC and its metabolites. Its implementation will offer an advanced approach for analyzing the prevalence and clinical implications of THC and metabolite levels in various patient populations, including trauma, pediatric patients, and organ transplant candidates.

Incomplete Immunity for Varicella and Measles in Pediatric Organ Transplant Candidates. Real World Experience From an Infectious Diseases Pre-Transplantation Clinic.

Vaccinating pediatric solid organ transplant candidates against measles and varicella is crucial due to the risk of severe disease in immunosuppressed recipients and general avoidance of live virus vaccines post-transplantation. The world saw a resurgence of measles starting 2012 prompting the American Society of Transplantation in 2015 to release guidelines on recognition, prevention, and post-exposure prophylaxis of this disease in solid transplant recipients. This study aims to assess the extent of incomplete immunity to these viruses in candidates and the approach to immunity optimization during a period of heightened awareness. A cross-sectional study from 2012 to 2016 at Cleveland Clinic Children's included pediatric solid organ transplant candidates. Data on vaccination history, serology, and demographics were collected. Incomplete immunity was defined by incomplete vaccination or seronegativity. Among 91 candidates, 54.9% had complete varicella vaccination. Serological varicella immunity among patients tested varied by age: < 7 years, 50.0% positive in patients with complete schedules, none in the incomplete; ≥ 7 years, 50.0% positive in patients with complete schedules, 65.5% in the incomplete. For measles, 69.2% had complete vaccination, with immunity varying by age among those tested: < 7 years, 84.6% positive in patients with complete schedules, 42.9% in the incomplete; ≥ 7 years, 81.0% with complete, 62.5% with incomplete. Only 31.1% of those who qualified for a varicella additional dose and 28% who qualified for an additional measles dose received it, respectively. Incomplete immunity to varicella and measles was prevalent in pediatric solid organ transplant candidates at our center during the study period. Despite an increase in global measles activity, our efforts to optimize immunity through additional vaccine doses were only partially successful. Future research should focus on addressing strategies and understanding barriers to ensure timely vaccination for this vulnerable population prior to transplant, especially during periods of increased viral activity.

Analysis of Indeterminate QuantiFERON Assay Results in Solid Organ Transplant Candidates and Proposed Management Algorithm.

Identification and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) mitigate the risk of tuberculosis (TB) reactivation after transplantation. TB reactivation is higher in those with indeterminate QuantiFERON (QFT) than those with negative results. Management of indeterminate QFT results in the pretransplant period remains unclear. We conducted a retrospective study of solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, 18 y and older, who were screened with QFT assay pretransplantation at Mayo Clinic between January 2010 and June 2023. We examined the frequency of indeterminate QFT results, results of repeat LTBI screening, treatment decisions, and rate of posttransplant TB infection. Of 13 008 patients screened for LTBI before SOT, 736 (6%) patients had indeterminate QFT results. Among these, 247 (34%) underwent a second LTBI screening test, and 39 (5%) received LTBI treatment. Among 247 patients with a repeat LTBI screening test, 185 (75%), 48 (19%), and 14 (6%) were tested by QFT, T-SPOT.TB, or TST, respectively. The repeat QFT remained indeterminate in 160 (86%) patients, whereas all T-SPOT.TB results were negative. Posttransplant TB infection occurred in 2 (0.3%) patients; neither had a second TB screening test pretransplant nor received LTBI treatment. In SOT recipients with indeterminate QFT results at pretransplant evaluation, opting for T-SPOT.TB as a second test may be preferable over repeat QFT. TB infection after transplantation in patients with a pretransplant indeterminate QFT result was rare. Patient management and LTBI treatment in those with indeterminate QFT pretransplant should account for epidemiological risk factors, and shared decision-making is recommended.

P.417: Free microvascular tissue transfers in solid organ transplant candidates and recipients.

P.417: Free microvascular tissue transfers in solid organ transplant candidates and recipients.

Disease progression of side-branch intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms following solid organ transplant

BackgroundBranch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMNs) are becoming more prevalent with advanced medical imaging and account for most of pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs). Most incidental lesions should be surveyed, with resection reserved for specific, high-risk cases. Solid organ transplantation candidates may be high risk of resection before transplant and will require systemic immunosuppression after transplant, which has been theorized to alter the natural history of the IPMN. We aimed to describe the progression in surveilled cysts after solid organ transplantation. MethodsA prospectively maintained database of PCNs was queried for patients with IPMN. Patients who had received a previous solid organ transplantation and with ≥2 imaging studies >6 months apart after transplantation were included. Clinically relevant (CR) progression was defined as symptoms, worrisome/high-risk stigmata, or invasive carcinoma (IC). Growth ≥5 mm in 2 years is considered CR progression; size ≥3 cm alone is not. ResultsBetween 1997 and 2023, 252 patients received solid organ transplantation (liver, 86; kidney, 113; and lung, 54) and were diagnosed as having an IPMN. This cohort was compared with a set of 770 patients surveilled for IPMN who did not have previous transplantation. Median follow-up period was 3.7 years (IQR, 1.6–6.8). Moreover, 2 transplant patients (0.8%) developed IC, and 4 developed (1.6%) high-grade dysplasia (HGD). Both were less common in transplant patients than the nontransplant population (IC, 3.3%; HGD, 2.9%), although this was not significant on time-to-event analysis (IC, P = .152; HGD, P = .352). The rate of CR progression was high in the transplant cohort (n = 118; 47%). Features of CR progression included size growth (n = 79; 67%), other worrisome/high-risk stigmata (n = 25; 21%), and new main duct involvement (n = 14; 12%). Compared with the nontransplant (n = 128; 17%), transplant patients had a higher rate of CR progression (P < .001), which was mostly explained by a more frequent size growth (31% vs 9%; P < .001). However, no transplant patients with size growth CR progression developed IC. Moreover, 17 (6.7%) required pancreatic surgery for CR progression after transplant vs 58 (7.5%) in the nontransplant population. Furthermore, 6 resected cysts (35%) harbored high-risk pathology after transplant (IC, 2; HGD, 4) vs 40 (69%) in the general population (P < .001; IC, 29; HGD, 11). ConclusionMalignant transformation of BD-IPMNs is rare despite systemic immunosuppression in solid organ transplant patients. This supports transplantation in patients with IPMN without fear of worsening their risk of pancreatic cancer, although it was associated with a higher risk of disease progression. Patients with IPMNs should be surveilled with yearly scans after transplant, with pancreatic resection reserved for only high-risk features as we continue to define the optimal criteria for those with CR progression.

Vaccinations in Paediatric Solid Organ Transplant Candidates and Recipients.

Solid organ transplant (SOT) candidates and recipients are a fragile population, in which the presence of a pre-transplant disease leading to organ insufficiency and the post-transplant immunosuppressive treatment expose them to an increased risk of infectious diseases. The best intervention to guarantee efficient prevention of infections, with optimal cost-benefit ratio, is represented by vaccination programs; however, the response to vaccines needs that the immune system maintains a good function. This is even more relevant at paediatric age, when specific immunological conditions make transplant candidates and recipients particularly vulnerable. Paediatric patients may be naïve to most infections and may have incomplete immunization status at the time of transplant listing due to their age. Moreover, the unaccomplished development of a mature immune system and the immunosuppressive regimen adopted after transplant might affect the efficacy of post-transplant vaccinations. Therefore, every effort should be made to obtain the widest vaccination coverage before the transplantation, whenever possible. This review reports the most relevant literature, providing information on the current approach to the vaccinations in paediatric SOT candidates and recipients.

Strongyloides stercoralis infection in solid organ transplant recipients.

Strongyloides stercoralis infection remains of concern due to its high associated morbidity among solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) and the risk of donor-derived infection (DDI). We review key aspects of epidemiology to inform screening for and treatment of chronic infection among organ transplant candidates to reduce the risk of infectious complications in the posttransplant setting. In this work, we offer guidance regarding the optimal management of Strongyloides hyperinfection syndrome and disseminated infection and offer recommendations regarding posttreatment surveillance and the potential need for repeat treatment during subsequent periods of augmented immunosuppression. This review also provides updated recommendations for screening of deceased and living donors as recently proposed by the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network's Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee. Risk reduction of Strongyloides infection in the SOTR population can be further enhanced by optimized treatment of infection, posttreatment surveillance during at-risk periods and recent proposed policy shifts to universal donor screening.

A Digital Approach to Improve Infection Screening Among Solid Organ Transplant Candidates.

Pretransplantinfection screening (IS) of potential organ recipientsis essential to optimal outcome of solid organ transplantation (SOT). A pre-post study was performed during 2020-2023 to investigate the impact of the STREAM (Solid organ TRansplant stEwArdship and Multidisciplinary approach) intervention to improve IS in SOT. The intervention, performed in 2022, included the implementation of IS through educational meetings, local guidelines, and the availability of a digital screening tool. The objective of the study was the assessment of IS completion, including a list of 17 laboratory tests and the investigation of vaccination status. The reduction of unnecessary tests was also analyzed. The test of proportions and a multilevel multivariate Poisson regression model were used to compare IS completion before and after STREAM. infectious diseases (ID) consultation and urgent evaluation were investigated as predictors of IS completion. A total of 171 patients were enrolled, including liver (44%), heart (32%), and kidney (24%) transplant candidates. Mean age was 56 ± 11 years, and most patients (77%) were males. Ninety-five (56%) patients were included before the intervention and 76 (44%) after STREAM. IS completion increased after STREAM (IRR 1.41, p < 0.001) with significant improvement recorded for seven (39%) IS items. Unnecessary tests decreased by 43% after the intervention. ID consultation (IRR 1.13, p = 0.02) and urgent evaluation (p = 0.68, p < 0.001) were predictors of IS improvement. STREAM was successful in improving IS completion. Further research is needed to investigate the impact of this intervention on posttransplant infections.

The Cascade of Care in Management of Solid Organ Transplant Candidates With Latent Tuberculosis Infection.

Solid organ transplant (SOT) candidates should be screened and treated for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) to prevent tuberculosis (TB) reactivation after transplantation. We aimed to assess the steps from positive QuantiFERON (QFT) through LTBI treatment (cascade of care) in the SOT population. We conducted a retrospective study of SOT recipients older than 18 y with a positive QFT during pretransplant evaluation at the Mayo Clinic from January 2010 to June 2023. We analyzed each cascade step to determine associated drop-out factors for LTBI management. Of 629 patients who had positive QFT results, 587 (93%) were evaluated by an infectious disease (ID) specialist, 478 (76%) were recommended to start LTBI treatment, 473 (75%) initiated LTBI treatment, and 457 (73%) completed LTBI treatment. LTBI treatment was not recommended in 109 patients evaluated by infectious disease, most of whom had previously received either LTBI (n = 72) or TB (n = 14) treatment. LTBI treatment was initiated before or after transplantation for 45% and 55% of patients, respectively. Isoniazid monotherapy was the most common regimen (92%), and adverse events were rare (7%). Seven patients developed active TB infection posttransplantation under various circumstances (3 without LTBI treatment, 1 during LTBI treatment, and 3 after completing LTBI treatment). Our findings demonstrate the variability of LTBI management in SOT recipients with positive QFT. When recommended, most patients completed LTBI treatment successfully. Nonetheless, active TB was noted regardless of whether patients received LTBI treatment. This study highlights the importance of optimizing LTBI management in this population.

Improving Vaccine Uptake Among Solid Organ Transplant Candidates

Vaccination in the pretransplantation phase is a key to improving the morbidity and mortality of solid organ transplant patients. A quality improvement project was undertaken to improve vaccine uptake among solid organ transplant candidates with the inclusion of a nurse practitioner-led infectious disease pretransplantation consultation service. Vaccination rates for coronavirus disease 2019, influenza, tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis, zoster, pneumococcal pneumonia, and hepatitis A were higher compared with the national vaccination rates. Implementation of a nurse practitioner-led pretransplantation vaccination review and counseling service can result in improved vaccination rates if implemented at transplant centers.

Physical exercise, the immune system and infection risk: implications for prehabilitation and rehabilitation for solid organ transplantation candidates and recipients.

Solid organ transplantation recipients have an increased risk of infection, exacerbated by immunosuppressant medications that need to finely balance suppression of the immune system to prevent allograft rejection while avoiding over-suppression leading to infections and malignancy. Exercise modulates immune functions, with moderate-intensity activities particularly associated with enhanced antiviral immunity and reduced infection incidence. However, investigations of the effects of exercise and physical activity on immune function and infection risk posttransplantation are scarce. This review highlights areas where the relationship between exercise, immune function and infection risk has greatest potential for benefit for solid organ transplantation and therefore greatest need for investigation. Moderate and higher intensity exercise do not appear to cause adverse immunological effects in kidney transplantation recipients, although evidence from other organ transplantation is lacking. Evidence from healthy younger and older adults suggests that regular exercise can reduce risk of respiratory infections and latent herpesvirus reactivation and improves antibody responses to vaccination, which is of great importance for organ transplantation recipients. There is a strong need for research to investigate the role of exercise on immune function and infection risk in solid organ transplantation to improve both allograft survival and long-term health of the recipient.

Exercise training in solid organ transplant candidates and recipients.

Exercise training programs are an integral part of the management of solid organ transplantation (SOT) candidates and recipients. Despite this, they are not widely available and specific guidelines on exercise parameters for each type of organ are not currently provided. A review of this topic could help clinicians to prescribe appropriate exercise regimens for their patients. In this narrative review, we discuss the physical impairments of SOT candidates and recipients and how these affect their physical function and transplant outcomes. We examine recent systematic reviews, statements, and randomized controlled trials on exercise training in SOT candidates and recipients and present the current available evidence while providing some practical recommendations for clinicians based on the frequency, intensity, time, and type principle. While randomized controlled trials of better methodology quality are needed to strengthen the evidence for the effects of exercise training and for the optimal training characteristics, the available evidence points to beneficial effects of many different types of exercise. The current evidence can provide some guidance for clinicians on the prescription of exercise training for transplant candidates and recipients.

Adaptación y validación de una versión abreviada de la escala SIPAT de riesgo psicosocial integrado en pacientes con cirrosis hepática candidatos a trasplante hepático (SIPAT-11)

IntroductionPatients with liver cirrhosis who are candidates for liver transplantation must be evaluated both clinically and socially in order to obtain the optimal outcomes and avoid futile therapeutic measures. For the evaluation of the social aspects in these patients, no validated scale in Spanish is available. The SIPAT (Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation) scale is an instrument that measures the social, family and psychological aspects in candidates for solid organ transplantation. The objective of this study is to adapt and validate an abbreviated version of the SIPAT scale in Spanish for patients with liver cirrhosis. Material and methodsProspective observational study carried out in the Hepatology Unit of the La Fe Unversity Hospital in Valencia, by questionnaire validation methodology. To analyze the reliability of the questionnaire, the internal consistency of all variables was calculated, for variability an exploratory factor analysis, and for stability the test-retest test was carried out. Results96 patients who were admitted for decompensated cirrhosis to the Hepatology Unit of the La Fe Hospital in Valencia between November 1, 2017 and January 31, 2017 were selected. 84% were men, the mean age was 60.01 (SD 10.12) years. In 73.2% of those admitted, the etiology of cirrhosis was alcoholic. 14.4% had a Child's stage A, 57.7% B and 27.8% C. The internal consistency of all variables reached a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.766. In the exploratory factor analysis, 6 dimensions of the questionnaire were identified that explain 84.27% of the total variability. To see the stability of the instrument, the measurement was repeated at 2 and 6 months of follow-up, obtaining in the test-retest a kappa agreement of 0.612 and 0.565 respectively. ConclusionThe SIPAT-11 questionnaire has good psychometric characteristics in cirrhotic patients who are candidates for liver transplantation. It is easy to complete and can be administered by professionals who are not specialists in the area of Mental Health.

Approach to vaccinating the pediatric solid organ transplant candidate and recipient.

Solid organ transplantation (SOT) candidates and recipients are at increased risk for morbidity and mortality from vaccine-preventable infections. Children are at particular risk given that they may not have completed their primary immunization series at time of transplant or have acquired natural immunity to pathogens from community exposures. Multiple society guidelines exist for vaccination of SOT candidate and recipients, although challenges remain given limited safety and efficacy data available for pediatric SOT recipients, particularly for live-vaccines. After transplant, individual patient nuances regarding exposure risks and net state of immunosuppression will impact timing of immunizations. The purpose of this review is to provide readers with a concise, practical, expert-opinion on the approach to vaccinating the SOT candidate and recipient and to supplement existing guidelines. In addition, pediatric-specific knowledge gaps in the field and future research priorities will be highlighted.

Vaccination Recommendations in Solid Organ Transplant Adult Candidates and Recipients.

Prevention of infections is crucial in solid organ transplant (SOT) candidates and recipients. These patients are exposed to an increased infectious risk due to previous organ insufficiency and to pharmacologic immunosuppression. Besides infectious-related morbidity and mortality, this vulnerable group of patients is also exposed to the risk of acute decompensation and organ rejection or failure in the pre- and post-transplant period, respectively, since antimicrobial treatments are less effective than in the immunocompetent patients. Vaccination represents a major preventive measure against specific infectious risks in this population but as responses to vaccines are reduced, especially in the early post-transplant period or after treatment for rejection, an optimal vaccination status should be obtained prior to transplantation whenever possible. This review reports the currently available data on the indications and protocols of vaccination in SOT adult candidates and recipients.

Determinants of compliance to influenza and COVID-19 vaccination in a cohort of solid organ transplant patients in Puglia, Southern Italy (2017–2022)

ABSTRACT Influenza and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination are recommended in both solid organ transplant (SOT) candidates and recipients. In Puglia, Southern Italy, an active vaccination offer program has been activated targeting these patients. This study aims at investigating vaccination coverage (VC) for both vaccines in a SOT patients’ cohort, as well as at identifying the vaccination compliance determinant. This is a retrospective, population-based study. The study population consists of the SOT patients who accessed Bari’s “Policlinico” General Hospital during 2017–2022. Patients were contacted and, after providing their consent, asked their immunization status regarding influenza and COVID-19 and whether they had already undergone transplant or were waiting to do so. Regression models were fitted to investigate the determinants of VCs for influenza vaccination (2021/22 and 2022/23 seasons) and for COVID-19 vaccination (three-dose base cycle, first and second booster doses). Three-hundred and ten SOT patients were identified; 85.2% (264/310) had already undergone SOT. VCs were suboptimal, especially for constant yearly influenza vaccination (17.7%) and COVID-19 vaccination’s second booster (1.94%). Logistic regression highlighted that influenza VCs are higher for SOT recipients than SOT candidates, as well as for older patients, although when considering both vaccination seasons only age significantly impact the vaccination uptake. Older age was the only influential variable for COVID-19 VC. VCs for SOT patients seem to be unsatisfying. Stronger interventions are required.

Implementation of a vaccination clinic for adult solid organ transplant candidates: A single-center experience

Vaccination is an evidence-based strategy to prevent or reduce the severity of infectious diseases (ID). Here, we aimed to describe the experience of implementing a vaccination clinic specifically targeting liver, heart, lung, and combined dual organ transplantation at a single transplantation center in Denmark. In this cohort of 242 solid organ transplant (SOT) candidates, we investigated seroprotection and the proportion of recommended vaccinations documented before transplantation. Furthermore, we registered completed vaccinations after ID consultations. The median age in our cohort was 53 years (IQR, 42–60), 60% were males (n = 135), and liver transplants (n = 138; 57%) were the most frequently planned organ transplants. Before the consultation to the vaccination clinic, influenza and pneumococcal vaccines had the highest proportion of documented vaccination (58% and 37%, respectively). Serological protection was more frequently observed for measles, mumps, or rubella (MMR, approximately 90% for each), while only 30% (n = 72) of SOT candidates showed seroprotection against pneumococcal disease. All SOT candidates required at least one of the recommended vaccines, and over 90% required three or more. At least 10% of patients in our cohort needed a live attenuated vaccine for either MMR or yellow fever. The most frequently administered vaccine was the tetanus–diphtheria-acelullar pertussis (Tdap) booster (n = 217; 90%), influenza vaccination was either administered (n = 16; 7%) or recommended (n = 226; 93%), PCV13 was administered (n = 155; 64%) or recommended (n = 27; 11%), and PPSV23 was either administered (n = 18; 7.4%) or recommended (n = 140; 58%). All SOT candidates adhered completely to their vaccination schedules. Based on our findings, we recommend prioritizing vaccination before transplantation by providing ID consultations for SOT candidates.

Impact of Type 2 Diabetes on the Outcomes of Solid Organ Transplantations in the U.S.: Data From a National Registry.

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a major driver of chronic diseases around the globe. The aim was to assess the impact of T2D on the outcomes of solid organ transplantations. We used the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients from 2006 to 2021 to collect data for all patients age ≥18 years who received a lung, heart, liver, or kidney transplant in the U.S. We included 462,692 solid organ transplant recipients: 31,503 lung, 38,004 heart, 106,639 liver, and 286,440 kidney transplantations. The prevalence of pretransplantation T2D was 15% in lung, 26% in heart, 25% in liver, and 30% in kidney transplant recipients, increasing over time. Posttransplantation mortality was significantly higher among transplant recipients with T2D versus those without T2D (lung 32.1% vs. 29.3% [3 years], 46.4% vs. 42.6% [5 years]; P < 0.01; heart 11.2% vs. 9.1% [1 year], 24.4% vs. 20.6% [5 years]; P < 0.0001; liver 10.6% vs. 8.9% [1 year], 26.2% vs. 22.0% [5 years]; P < 0.0001; kidney 5.3% vs. 2.5% [1 year], 20.8% vs. 10.1% [5 years]; P < 0.0001). Independent association of pretransplantation T2D with higher posttransplantation mortality was significant after adjustment for clinicodemographic confounders (adjusted hazard ratio in lung transplant recipients 1.08 [95% CI 1.03-1.13]; heart 1.26 [1.20-1.32]; liver 1.25 [1.21-1.28]; kidney 1.65 [1.62-1.68]; P < 0.01). The prevalence of T2D in solid organ transplantation candidates is increasing. In all solid organ transplantations, pretransplantation T2D was independently associated with higher posttransplantation mortality, most profoundly in kidney transplantations.

Pretransplantation coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination requirements: A matched case-control study of factors associated with waitlist inactivation

Numerous United States transplant centers require solid organ transplantation candidates to be vaccinated against the coronavirus disease of 2019 to be active on the United Network for Organ Sharing waiting list. This study examined characteristics of adult patients on one center's kidney transplantation waiting list whose status was inactivated due to a lack of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination by July 1, 2022, and who did not subsequently provide proof of vaccination by August 31, 2022 (cases). Patients in the control group were retrospectively matched to patients in the case group in a 4-to-1 fashion according to age, sex, and “active” status on the waiting list. Multivariable logistic regression was performed, with race/ethnicity, primary language, health insurance, education, and Vaccine Equity Metric (VEM, a measure of health equity at the zip code level) quartile as covariates. Results revealed that patients from zip codes in the lowest VEM quartile (odds ratio [OR] 1.89; P = .02) and those insured by governmental payors (Medicare: OR, 2.00; P < .01 and Medicaid: OR, 2.89; P < .01) had higher odds of being inactivated than those from zip codes that make up the highest VEM quartile and those insured by commercial payors, respectively. These findings serve as a cautionary tale regarding universal pretransplantation vaccination requirements, which may raise equity concerns that should be considered upon policy implementation.

Malnutrition in solid organ transplant patients: A review of the literature.

Screening for malnutrition is of vital importance for solid organ transplant candidates to optimize nutrition status before transplant, to improve clinical outcomes and to inform selection committees of nutritional contraindications and risks. There are multiple criteria and screening tools available for determining malnutrition diagnosis and risk. Registered Dietitian Nutritionists use these tools for nutrition assessments to quantify the severity of malnutrition, provide patient-centered interventions, and monitor progression. Many transplant centers in the United States utilize the American Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics' Adult Malnutrition Criteria, though there is limited research using these criteria specifically in the transplant population. Malnutrition, utilizing other diagnostic and screening tools, has been associated with important complications, including longer length of hospital stay, increased mortality, decreased quality of life, worsened end-stage organ progression, and decreased functional status. Malnutrition typically results from sarcopenia and cachexia, and can ultimately lead to frailty, causing further negative impacts on transplant outcomes. This literature review summarizes the current research on malnutrition in solid organ transplant candidates and provides recommendations for future research and current practice implications.