PurposeThis study intends to compare the radiation doses and cancer induction risks from thoracic diagnostic CT (DG-CT) and radiotherapy treatment planning CT (RP-CT) scans. Material and methodsA cross-sectional study on two groups of patients who underwent thoracic CT scans with RP-CT (n = 100) and DG-CT (n = 100) was conducted. The characteristics of the two groups, including age, weight, height, and body mass index were almost similar. To calculate organ and effective doses in a standard 70 kg phantom, the volume CT Dose Index (CTDIv) and dose-length product (DLP) were recorded and utilized with the ImPACT CT Patient Dosimetry Calculator. Patient-specific organ and effective doses were acquired by applying a weight-based correction factor. The lifetime attribute risk (LAR) of cancers was estimated according to the method proposed in Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation (BEIR VII) which considers age and sex differences. ResultsThe mean ± standard deviation values of CTDIv, DLP, and effective dose were 12.19 ± 3.49 mGy, 568.68 ± 109.42 mGy cm, and 11.46 ± 2.07 mSv for RP-CT, respectively. For DG-CT, these values were 12.33 ± 3.37 mGy, 372.46 ± 99.57 mGy cm, and 7.65 ± 2.07 mSv, respectively. In males, the mean ± SD of cancer incidence risk of all cancers, all solid, and leukemia were 34.57 ± 18.91, 28.79 ± 16.74, 5.77 ± 2.28 per 100,000 individuals, respectively, for DG-CT. These values were 50.77 ± 14.53, 42.37 ± 12.81, and 9.09 ± 1.67 per 100,000 individuals, respectively, for RP-CT. In the female patients, the mean ± SD of cancer incidence risk of all cancers, all solid, and leukemia were 55.04 ± 31.64, 50.77 ± 14.53, 4.32 ± 1.26 per 100,000 individuals, respectively, for DG-CT. These values for RP-CT were 85.46 ± 30.10, 73.49 ± 26.12, and 6.97 ± 1.69 cancers per 100,000 individuals, respectively. ConclusionCancer incidence and mortality risks for RP-CT were higher than for DG-CT scans, highlighting the need for greater optimization of exposure parameters. For individuals, particularly young female patients, the advantages of CT imaging must be balanced against the risks of radiation.
Read full abstract