Oral Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Research Articles

Efficacy and safety of fluzoparib combined with anlotinib in extensive stage small cell lung cancer after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy: a multi-center, single-arm prospective phase II clinical study (STAMP study)

BackgroundSmall-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive and lethal malignancy that accounts for 10–15% of lung cancers, and it is generally divided into limited and extensive stage. The standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC) is still platinum-based chemotherapy and as maintenance therapy scheme. Although most parts of patients experience a significant tumor response to first-line therapy, the disease recurs invariably. Anlotinib hydrochloride, a novel oral multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has significant inhibitory activity against angiogenesis-related kinases, such as VEGFR, FGFR, PDGFR, and c-Kit kinase associated with tumor cell proliferation. Fluzoparib is a type of inhibitor of poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP, including PARPl, PARP2 and PARP3). Previous studies have shown that Fluzoparib has a strong inhibitory effect on PARP1 activity at the molecular and cellular levels.MethodsThis is a multi-center, prospective, single-arm phase II clinical study. A total of 50 ES-SCLC patients who experienced disease progression after first-line standard platinum-based chemotherapy with/without immune checkpoint inhibitors scheme, or within 6 months after the completion of treatment will be recruited. Those who had prior treatment with any PARP inhibitor or antiangiogenic agent includes anlotinib, bevacizumab, sorafenib, and thalidomide are excluded. Eligible patients will receive oral anlotinib 8 mg once daily and oral fluzoparib 150 mg twice daily until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR).DiscussionThe addition of fluzoparib to anlotinib is expected to increase the clinical benefit in ES-SCLC patients after platinum-based chemotherapy.Trial registrationThis study protocol was prospectively registered on June 17, 2021. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04933175.

Anlotinib exerts an anti-T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia effect in vitro and in vivo

BackgroundDespite some progress having been made regarding the treatment of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL), the prognosis of T-ALL, particularly adult T-ALL, is still poor. Identifying novel, effective anti-T-ALL drugs is of great significance. Anlotinib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor currently utilized in the treatment of lung cancer, exhibited a promising anti-T-ALL effect. A comprehensive study should therefore be conducted to explore both the in vitro as well as in vivo mechanisms of the anti-T-ALL effects of anlotinib. MethodsCCK8 assays and flow cytometry were employed to investigate the viability, cell cycle distribution, and apoptosis of T-ALL cell lines when treated with anlotinib. T-ALL xenograft mouse models were established to examine the in vivo antileukemic effects of anlotinib. Cellular and molecular analysis of T-ALL were conducted to define the underlying mechanisms. ResultsIn vitro, anlotinib significantly inhibited the viability, induced G2/M phase arrest and apoptosis in T-ALL cell lines in a concentration-dependent pattern. In vivo, anlotinib also demonstrated a strong anti-tumor effect at doses that are well-tolerated. Interestingly, anlotinib could decrease the protein levels of the intracellular domains of NOTCH1 (ICN1) and c-Myc, two important targets for T-ALL. Mechanistically, anlotinib-induced c-Myc reduction was associated with proteasome-mediated degradation, while the ICN1 reduction was not due to protein degradation or transcriptional repression. ConclusionsThe present study showed that anlotinib may be a promising anti-T-ALL candidate drug, and simultaneous reduction of the protein levels of both ICN1 and c-Myc may contribute to the anti-T-ALL efficacy of anlotinib.

Clinical Utility of Mobocertinib in the Treatment of NSCLC - Patient Selection and Reported Outcomes.

Mobocertinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that selectively targets epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 insertion (EGFRex20ins) mutations. It is a structural analog of the third-generation TKI osimertinib, which targets EGFR T790M mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, mobocertinib gains selectivity for EGFRex20ins mutants over wild type (WT) by interacting with the C790 gatekeeper residue of EGFR. This is accomplished via a carboxylated isopropyl ester moiety at the C5-position of mobocertinib's central pyrimidine core. In Phase 1/2 dose-escalation and dose-expansion studies, mobocertinib was found to have an investigator-confirmed overall response rate (ORR) of 56% (9/16; 95% CI: 30-80%) and 25% (3/12; 95% CI: 5-57%) in patients without and with baseline brain metastasis, respectively. Median investigator-assessed progression-free survival (mPFS) was 10.2 months (95% CI: 5.6 - not reached) and 3.7 months (95% CI: 1.8-15.9) in patients without and with baseline brain metastasis, respectively. A third phase evaluated patients who had received pre-treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy (PPP) and included an extension cohort (EXCLAIM cohort) which evaluated patients treated previously with 1 or 2 lines of therapy. An Independent Review Committee (IRC) found both cohorts to have similar outcomes in terms of ORR, median time to response, mPFS, and disease progression or death. The treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) related to mobocertinib are similar to other EGFR inhibitors and are predominately gastrointestinal (eg diarrhea, nausea, vomiting) and cutaneous (eg rash). In September 2021, the FDA granted accelerated approval for mobocertinib in the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with EGFRex20ins mutation whose disease progressed while on platinum-based chemotherapy. The present review describes data that led to the approval of mobocertinib.

Safety, Tolerability, and Antitumor Activity of Zipalertinib Among Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Harboring Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Exon 20 Insertions.

Although several agents targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertions (ex20ins) have recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, toxicities related to the inhibition of wild-type (WT) EGFR are common with these agents and affect overall tolerability. Zipalertinib (CLN-081, TAS6417) is an oral EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with a novel pyrrolopyrimidine scaffold leading to enhanced selectivity for EGFR ex20ins-mutant versus WT EGFR with potent inhibition of cell growth in EGFR ex20ins-positive cell lines. This phase 1/2a study of zipalertinib enrolled patients with recurrent or metastatic EGFR ex20ins-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Seventy-three patients were treated with zipalertinib at dose levels including 30, 45, 65, 100, and 150 mg orally twice a day. Patients were predominantly female (56%), had a median age of 64 years, and were heavily pretreated (median previous systemic therapies 2, range 1-9). Thirty six percent of patients had received previous non-ex20ins EGFR TKIs and 3/73 (4.1%) patients received previous EGFR ex20ins TKIs. The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events of any grade included rash (80%), paronychia (32%), diarrhea (30%), and fatigue (21%). No cases of grade 3 or higher drug-related rash or diarrhea were observed at 100 mg twice a day or below. Objective responses occurred across all zipalertinib dose levels tested, with confirmed partial response (PR) observed in 28/73 (38.4%) response-evaluable patients. Confirmed PRs were seen in 16/39 (41%) response-evaluable patients at the dose of 100 mg twice a day. Zipalertinib has encouraging preliminary antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with EGFR ex20ins-mutant NSCLC, with an acceptable safety profile, including low frequency of high-grade diarrhea and rash.

Pyrotinib in combination with letrozole for hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer (PLEHERM): a multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial

BackgroundHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) targeted therapy combined with endocrine therapy has been recommended as an alternative treatment strategy for patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This study aimed to evaluate the role of pyrotinib, an oral pan-HER irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in combination with letrozole for patients with HR-positive, HER2-positive MBC.MethodsIn this multi-center, phase II trial, HR-positive and HER2-positive MBC patients who were not previously treated for metastasis disease were enrolled. Patients received daily oral pyrotinib 400 mg and letrozole 2.5 mg until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was the clinical benefit rate (CBR) assessed by an investigator according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1.ResultsFrom November 2019 to December 2021, 53 patients were enrolled and received pyrotinib plus letrozole. As of August 2022, the median follow-up duration was 11.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.7–14.0 months). The CBR was 71.7% (95% CI, 57.7–83.2%), and the objective response rate was 64.2% (95% CI, 49.8–76.9%). The median progression-free survival was 13.7 months (95% CI, 10.7–18.7 months). The most common treatment-related adverse event of grade 3 or higher was diarrhea (18.9%). No treatment-related deaths were reported, and one patient experienced treatment discontinuation due to adverse event.ConclusionsOur preliminary results suggested that pyrotinib plus letrozole is feasible for the first-line treatment of patients with HR-positive and HER2-positive MBC, with manageable toxicities.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04407988.

Efficacy of apatinib 250 mg combined with chemotherapy in patients with pretreated advanced breast cancer in a real-world setting.

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of apatinib (an oral small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting VEGFR-2) 250 mg combined with chemotherapy in patients with pretreated metastatic breast cancer in a real-world setting. A database of patients with advanced breast cancer who received apatinib between December 2016 and December 2019 in our institution was reviewed, and patients who received apatinib combined with chemotherapy were included. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), the objective response rate (ORR), the disease control rate (DCR), and treatment-related toxicity were analyzed. In total, 52 evaluated patients with metastatic breast cancer previously exposed to anthracyclines or taxanes who received apatinib 250 mg combined with chemotherapy were enrolled in this study. Median PFS and OS were 4.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.2-6.4) and 15.4 months (95% CI = 9.2-21.6), respectively. The ORR and DCR were 25% and 86.5%, respectively. Median PFS for the previous line of treatment was 2.1 months (95% CI = 0.65-3.6), which was significantly shorter than that for the apatinib-chemotherapy combination (p < 0.001). No significant difference was identified in the ORR and PFS among the subgroups(subtypes, target lesion, combined regimens and treatment lines). The common toxicities related to apatinib were hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, proteinuria, and fatigue events. Apatinib 250 mg combined with chemotherapy provided favorable efficacy in patients with pretreated metastatic breast cancer regardless of molecular types and treatment lines. The toxicities of the regimen were well tolerated and manageable. This regimen could be a potential treatment option in patients with refractory pretreated metastatic breast cancers.

Waldenström's macroglobulinemia - clinical symptoms and review of therapy yesterday, today and tomorrow.

Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a lymphoplasmocytic lymphoma with immunoglobulin M monoclonal protein. The incidence of this disease is very low (0.4/100,000), so that this disease can be regarded as an orphan's disease. It means that new drugs are often tested and registered for more frequent diseases. In this review we will focus on the efficacy of the new drugs for WM. The current treatment options for symptomatic WM patients include alkylating agent cyclophosphamide and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies. Therapy with rituximab and bendamustin resulted in longer therapeutic response then therapy with rituximab, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone. Many drugs, used in multiple myeloma (MM), shoved promising results in WM patients. Bortezomib is effective in WM, but its neurotoxicity is higher in WM than in MM patients. Therefore, new proteasome inhibitors, carfilzomib and ixazomib, are better tolerated as documented in several studies. New types of antiCD20 antibody (obinutuzumab) can be used in patients with rituximab intolerance. in five of our patients with WM, obinutuzumab and bendamustin reached deeper responses than therapies administered in previous lines of therapy. Oral Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib alone and in combination with rituximab have extended the treatment options for WM patients. New BTK inhibitors (e. g. acalabrutinib, zanubrutinib, and vecabrutinib) were tested and their lower toxicity (atrial fibrillation) was documented. Moreover, the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax is newly tested. New antiCD20 antibody (obinutuzumab) is of advantage in patients with WM with rituximab intolerance as well as bendamustin and new proteasome inhibitors (ixazomib and carfilzomib) or new BTK inhibitors with lower cardiotoxicity. Many of the abovementioned drugs do not have official registration for WM and can be administrated with the consent of the health care provider only. Thus, this work brings evidence of their efficacy.

Phase 3 THOR study: Results of erdafitinib (erda) versus chemotherapy (chemo) in patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) with select fibroblast growth factor receptor alterations (FGFRalt).

LBA4619 Background: FGFRalt are observed in ~20% of pts with mUC. Erda is an oral selective pan-FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor granted accelerated approval to treat locally advanced or mUC in adults with susceptible FGFR3/2alt who have progressed after platinum-containing chemo. THOR (NCT03390504), a randomized phase 3 study, assessed whether erda provided a survival advantage vs investigator’s choice of chemo in pts with mUC who progressed after 1 or 2 prior treatments, including an anti-PD-(L)1 agent. Methods: Pts (≥18 y) with unresectable advanced/mUC and select FGFR3/2alt (mutations/fusions), ECOG performance status 0-2, adequate organ function, progression on/after prior systemic therapy (tx) that included an anti-PD-(L)1 agent, and ≤2 prior lines of tx were randomized 1:1 to receive erda (8 mg with pharmacodynamically guided uptitration to 9 mg on day 14) QD or investigator’s choice of chemo (docetaxel or vinflunine) Q3W until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. Results: 266 pts were randomized: 136 pts assigned to erda, 130 to chemo. In all pts, median age was 67 y; 30% had 1 prior line of tx, 70% had 2 prior lines; 74% had visceral metastases; 90% were PD-L1 low (CPS &lt;10). Median follow-up was 15.9 mo. The primary endpoint of the study was met, with erda significantly increasing OS and reducing the risk of death by 36%; median OS was 1 y (Table). These data met predefined stopping criteria for superiority. Erda also significantly improved median PFS (5.6 vs 2.7 mo) and ORR (46% vs 12%) vs chemo. No new safety signals were seen. Serious treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were observed in 13% and 24% of pts with erda and chemo, respectively, and grade (Gr) 3/4 TRAEs were observed in 46% and 46% of pts with erda and chemo, respectively. TRAEs leading to death were reported in 1 and 6 pts with erda and chemo, respectively. More TRAEs leading to dose reduction were observed with erda (66%) vs chemo (21%); 8% and 13% of pts had TRAEs leading to discontinuation of erda and chemo, respectively. Central serous retinopathy occurred in 23 pts (17%) with erda (Gr 1-2, 20 pts). Conclusions: In pts with FGFRalt advanced/mUC after prior treatment with PD-(L)1, erda significantly improved OS, PFS, and ORR vs investigator’s choice of chemo. Erda toxicity was consistent with the known safety profile. These results support the role of erda to treat pts with FGFRalt mUC after PD-(L)1 tx. Clinical trial information: NCT03390504 . [Table: see text]

Phase 1, randomized, open-label, single-dose, crossover study to evaluate the bioequivalence of four formulations of oral rivoceranib tablets in healthy subjects.

e15122 Background: Rivoceranib is a novel oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor that potently and selectively inhibits VEGFR2. Rivoceranib is being investigated for indications targeted towards solid malignancies as either monotherapy or in combination with other anticancer therapies. Herein, we assessed the bioequivalence of a single dose of rivoceranib administered as 4 different formulations in healthy subjects. Methods: This single-center, open-label, randomized, single-dose, 4-way crossover study evaluated the bioequivalence of 4 different formulations of rivoceranib oral tablets in healthy adults. Each subject participated in 4 treatment periods, where they were randomized to 1 of 4 sequences: ABCD, BDAC, CADB, and DBAC (Formulation A = rivoceranib 250 mg tablet/clinical formulation used in the pivotal phase 3 study, Formulation B = rivoceranib 200 mg tablet/clinical formulation used in early clinical studies, Formulation C = rivoceranib 250 mg tablet/formulation to be developed for future use, Formulation D = rivoceranib 250 mg tablet/to-be-marketed formulation). Results: Of the 60 subjects enrolled, 66.7% were male, 88.3% were white, and median age was 43 years. The median plasma rivoceranib Tmax was similar following all treatments (2 hours post-dose). The 90% CIs around the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of plasma rivoceranib AUC0-t, AUC0-inf, and Cmax for Formulation B vs. Formulation A and Formulation D vs. Formulation A were within the 80-125% reference interval, demonstrating bioequivalence between Formulation B and Formulation A as well as Formulation D and Formulation A. The 90% CIs around the GMRs of plasma rivoceranib AUC0-t, AUC0-inf, and Cmax for Formulation C vs. Formulation A were slightly outside of the 80%-125% reference interval. Conclusions: Formulations B (clinical formulation used in early clinical studies) and D (to-be-marketed formulation) were bioequivalent to Formulation A (clinical formulation used in the pivotal phase 3 study). Formulation C (formulation to be developed for future use) and Formulation A were similar, but the difference was slightly outside of the bioequivalence criteria. It remains to be evaluated whether the difference in bioavailability between Formulation C and Formulation A is clinically meaningful. Clinical trial information: NCT05287360 . [Table: see text]

Updated results from a phase 2 study of the oral vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) inhibitor rivoceranib for recurrent or metastatic (R/M) adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC).

6040 Background: ACC is a rare tumor that overexpresses VEGF, primarily affecting salivary glands. Often indolent, it can progress, with metastases common in the lungs, liver, and bone. There are no FDA-approved systemic treatments (tx) for R/M ACC. Rivoceranib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that potently and selectively inhibits VEGFR2. Methods: In this single-arm, open-label multicenter trial, patients (pts) with R/M ACC with evidence of ≥20% progression by RECIST v1.1 or new lesions within the preceding 6 months (mos) were eligible, with no limit on prior tx. Pts received rivoceranib 700 mg daily until disease progression or withdrawal with pre-planned dose reductions for toxicity. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1 by investigator (INV) and by Independent Review Committee (IRC). Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and safety exploratory analysis included disease control rate (DCR) and ORR using CHOI criteria by IRC. Results: As of 11/2022, 80 pts (72 evaluable) were enrolled in the US and Korea (53% male; median age, 54 yrs), and 6 pts remain on tx. Primary tumor sites: major (34%) and minor (59%) salivary glands and other (8%). 74 pts (93%) had metastatic disease. 61.3% had prior systemic tx (18% prior VEGFR TKI). INV and IRC-assessed efficacy data are listed in the table. ORR by CHOI was 52.5% (53.1% VEGFR TKI-naive and 50% VEGFR TKI treated). mOS was 25.3 mos (28.3 mos VEGFR TKI-naïve and 22.6 mos VEGFR treated). Common adverse events (AEs) were hypertension (66%), fatigue (64%), and nausea (54%). Grade ≥3 AEs that occurred in &gt;5% of pts were hypertension (43%), stomatitis (8%), fatigue and anemia (6% each). There were 4 Grade 5 AEs (2 epistaxis [1 related], 1 acute respiratory failure, 1 respiratory failure). Conclusions: Updated results with additional 9-month follow-up data continue to demonstrate that Rivoceranib has clinical efficacy and a manageable safety profile in pts with R/M ACC. Clinical trial information: NCT04119453 . [Table: see text]

A comparative study evaluating the quality of life in patients receiving chemotherapy versus oral TKI in the third line and beyond setting for advanced non–small-cell lung cancer.

e21195 Background: The outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have improved due to the availability of more effective systemic &amp; improved supportive care. This has increased the number of patients who seek treatment in the third line &amp; beyond setting. We conducted this study to compare the quality of life (QoL), toxicity &amp; outcomes in patients receiving chemotherapy &amp; oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in this setting. Methods: In this phase 3 randomized open-label study patients with stage III/IV NSCLC with disease progression on at least 2 prior lines of chemotherapy, with a life expectancy of at least 3 months, without prior TKI exposure, and stable brain metastases (if any) were included. Patients were randomised to receive chemotherapy(Gemcitabine/docetaxel/paclitaxel/vinorelbine) or TKI (erlotinib or gefitinib). Patients were evaluated at every visit for clinical benefit and toxicity (as per CTCAE v4.3). A radiological tumour response assessment was done every 8-12 weeks from the start of therapy. The QoL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ C-30 &amp; LC-13 questionnaires at baseline and every 8-10 weeks while on treatment. The primary endpoint is the change in QoL scores at 8-10 weeks, the secondary endpoints are safety and overall survival. The change in QoL scores at baseline and scores at 8-10 weeks was determined and the mean difference between the arms was compared using the independent t-test. Overall and progression-free survival was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional regression analysis. Results 246 patients were enrolled in the study, 123 in each arm. There was a male predominance in both arms. There was no significant difference in the change in the QoL scores from baseline to the subsequent visit (at 8-10 weeks) in both arms in all domains of QLQ C-30 &amp; LC 13 except alopecia. The mean difference in scores for alopecia was 23.73 (+/-52.22) in the chemotherapy arm &amp; -18.35 (+/- 47.32) in the oral TKI arm (p = 0.000). The median follow-up was 88.1 mos (95%CI39.04-137.15). On ITT analysis the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.13 mos (95%CI 2.15-4.11) in the chemotherapy arm and 2.26 mos (95%CI 2.1-2.43) in the oral TKI arm, hazard ratio (HR) 1.074 (95% CI 0.833- 1.38), p = 0.6. There were 120 deaths in each arm. The median overall survival (OS) was 7.63 mos (95% CI 5.96-9.30) in the chemotherapy arm and 7.5 mos in the oral TKI arm (95% CI 5.85-9.14); HR 1.024 (95%CI 0.793-1.321),p = 0.9. The toxicity profile was similar in both arms except for CIPN, alopecia, pedal edema which was higher in the chemotherapy arm, &amp; dry skin &amp; skin rash was higher in the oral TKI arm Conclusion In the third line setting there is no significant difference in most QoL domains with similar outcomes( PFS&amp; OS) and toxicity profile is consistent with expected toxicities of the drugs.

BLU-945 monotherapy and in combination with osimertinib (OSI) in previously treated patients with advanced EGFR-mutant (EGFRm) NSCLC in the phase 1/2 SYMPHONY study.

9011 Background: Despite improved frontline OSI treatment outcomes, patients (pts) with advanced EGFRm NSCLC inevitably progress, with worse outcomes in the EGFR L858R subgroup (median PFS of 14.4 vs 21.4 mo in pts with exon 19 deletions). BLU-945 is an investigational, next-generation, oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that targets common EGFR-activating and T790M and C797X resistance mutations, while being selective against EGFR wild type (WT). Preclinically, BLU-945 in combination (combo) with OSI had enhanced potency on L858R and extended antitumor response durability versus OSI alone. SYMPHONY (NCT04862780) is an ongoing first-in-human phase 1/2 study of BLU-945 monotherapy (mono) or combo with OSI. Methods: In the phase 1 dose escalation, pts (aged ≥18 y; metastatic EGFRm NSCLC; ECOG PS 0–1; treated with ≥1 EGFR TKI) received BLU-945 mono starting at 25 mg QD. Pts progressing on OSI could receive BLU-945 with 80 mg OSI starting at 50% of the highest safe BLU-945 mono dose. Each dose escalation followed a Bayesian Optimal Interval design. Safety, including dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), PK, and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) mutational status were assessed. Results: As of Jan 6, 2023, 108 pts received BLU-945 mono (25–600 mg QD; 100–300 mg BID). Pts had a median of 3 lines of prior therapy and were genomically complex with ctDNA detectable EGFR on-target and/or off-target resistance alterations (46%) at baseline. DLTs included alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) elevation, hepatic cytolysis, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and hyponatremia, occurring at doses of ≥400 mg/d. The maximum tolerated dose was 500 mg/d. The most common AEs were nausea (42%), headache (40%), increased ALT (38%), increased AST (37%), and vomiting (32%). Robust on-target EGFR activity was observed with ctDNA reduction on day 15 in 90%, 85% and 70% of EGFR T790M, C797S, and L858R alleles at ≥400 mg/d doses, respectively. At ≥400 mg/d, 48% had tumor shrinkage, including partial responses (PRs). Twenty-five pts received BLU-945 (200–400 mg QD; 100–200 mg BID) combo with OSI. Pts had a median of 2 lines of prior therapy. The most common combo AEs were fatigue (36%), diarrhea (32%), headache (32%), and nausea (28%). Other EGFR WT AEs were dry skin (20%) and rash (8%). One DLT (Grade 4 pneumonitis) was reported in the BLU-945 300 mg QD with OSI group. Tumor reductions, including PRs in 2 pts progressing on OSI, were observed at ≥300 mg/d. Dose escalation is ongoing. Conclusions: BLU-945 mono and combo with OSI were generally well tolerated and showed robust on-target EGFR ctDNA reduction, with tumor shrinkage in genomically heterogeneous, heavily pretreated pts. Combo showed responses at BLU-945 doses lower than in mono, consistent with additive benefit. The combo safety profile and on-target activity provide rationale for further development in front line. Clinical trial information: NCT04862780 .

Tumor agnostic efficacy and safety of erdafitinib (erda) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors with prespecified FGFR alterations (FGFRalt): RAGNAR primary analysis.

3121 Background: FGFRalt are present across malignancies at various frequencies and may act as oncogenic drivers across tissue histology. Erda is an oral selective pan-FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor with activity and safety in pts with prespecified FGFR-altered locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) and cholangiocarcinoma . RAGNAR (NCT04083976) is an ongoing phase 2 open-label, single-arm tumor agnostic trial of erda in pretreated adult and pediatric pts with FGFRalt advanced solid tumors. Interim results showed erda clinical benefit, with an objective response rate (ORR) of 29.2%. Here we report results of the primary analysis. Methods: Pts aged ≥12 y with advanced or metastatic (non-UC) tumors of any histology with predefined FGFR1-4alt (mutations/fusions per local/central test), disease progression on ≥1 prior line of systemic therapy (tx), and no alternative standard tx received oral erda until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary end point was ORR by independent review committee (IRC). Secondary end points included duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR [CR + PR + SD]), clinical benefit rate (CBR [CR + PR + SD &gt;4 mo]), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Results: At data cutoff, 217 pts were treated, median age was 57.0 y (range, 12-79), median prior systemic tx was 2 (46%; ≥3 lines of tx) with an ORR to last line prior to study entry of 10.1%. ORR to erda tx by IRC was 29.5% (95% CI, 23.5-36.0) with 6 CRs (2.8%) and 58 PRs (26.7%) in 16 distinct tumor types, including advanced CNS, thoracic, gastrointestinal, gynecologic, and rare tumors. ORR was comparable across FGFR1-3 mutations (25.3% [95% CI, 16.0-36.7]) and fusions (32.6% [95% CI, 25.1-40.9]). Median DOR, PFS, and OS were 6.9 mo (95% CI, 4.4-7.1), 4.2 mo (95% CI, 4.1-5.5), and 10.7 mo (95% CI, 8.7-12.1), respectively; DCR was 73.7% and CBR was 45.6%. 99.5% of pts experienced TEAEs, including 70.0% with grade ≥3. Treatment-related serious AEs occurred in 8.3% of pts with no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: Primary analysis results from RAGNAR, the largest tumor agnostic trial of targeted tx to date, confirm efficacy of erda in heavily pretreated pts with FGFRalt advanced solid tumors. Erda activity was observed in adults and adolescents across tumor types, and across FGFR1-3 gene mutations and fusions. Erda tolerability was consistent with its known safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT04083976 . [Table: see text]

Anlotinib plus irinotecan or docetaxel in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) relapsed within six months: Updated results from a single-arm, phase Ⅱ study.

e20629 Background: There is still no unsatisfactory treatment strategy for patients (pts) with advanced SCLC relapsed within six months after first-line treatment, although chemotherapy alone is the standard treatment. Anlotinib, an oral multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, effectively inhibits angiogenesis and enhances tumor cell response to chemotherapy. In the ALTER 1202 trial, anlotinib had significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of advanced SCLC pts who received at least two lines chemotherapy. Therefore, we presented the updated efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus irinotecan or docetaxel in SCLC relapsed within six months after first-line treatment. Methods: Eligible pts with advanced SCLC who have relapsed within six months after first-line platinum-based treatment received anlotinib (12mg, QD from day 1 to 14 of a 21-day cycle, the dose could be adjusted to 10mg or 8mg according to the patient's tolerance) and irinotecan (65mg/m2, day1,8, q3w, up to 4 cycles) or docetaxel (60mg/m2, q3w, up to 4 cycles) until progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included PFS, the disease control rate (DCR), OS and safety. Results: As of Jan 31, 2023, we recruited 39 pts, among which 36 pts (median age: 63.2 years, male: 86.1%, ECOG PS 1: 80.6%, brain metastasis: 58.3%, liver metastasis: 36.1%) were eligible for efficacy analysis. Median follow-up time was 17.2 months (95% Cl, 8.27 -26.13 ). Of 36 evaluable pts, 1 pts had complete response (CR) , 20 pts reached partial response (PR) and 11 pts had stable disease(SD). The ORR was 58% (21/36) and the DCR was 89% (32/36), respectively. The median PFS was 4.4 months (95%Cl: 3.73- 5.08). The median OS was 7.9 months (95%Cl: 5.28-10.52). The Progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with recurrence &gt; 3 months and ≤ 6 months (PFS 6.5 m and OS 11.9 m) after first-line therapy improved more significantly than in patients with recurrence ≤ 3 months (PFS 4.1 m and OS 5.9 m). Most common grade 1-2 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) included weakness(58.3%), anorexia(38.9%), anemia(25%), hypertension (15.6%), Oral mucositis (13.9%) and leucopenia (11.1%). 3 pts (8.3%) suffered from grade 3 AEs, which were thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, and anemia. Conclusions: Anlotinib combined with irinotecan or docetaxel as second-line treatment for non-sensitive recurrent SCLC (i.e., extensive-stage disease time to relapse: 0-6 months) showed superior efficacy and safety compared with standard chemotherapy. It may become a novel therapeutic strategy for the population. Clinical trial information: NCT04757779 .

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib in overall and disease-specific advanced gynecological cancer: A real-world study.

5608 Background: Anlotinib is a novel oral small-molecule multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has been approved for treating non-small cell lung cancer. However, its efficacy and safety among patients with advanced gynecological cancer. We conducted this study to address this issue in the real-world setting. Methods: Data from patients treated with anlotinib for persistent, recurrent or metastatic gynecological cancer including cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancer were collected from 17 centers from August 2018. The database lock-time was on March 2022. Anlotinib was administered orally on days 1–14 every 3 weeks until disease progression, severe toxicity occurred, or death. The outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: A total of 249 patients were analyzed, with a median follow-up of 14.46 months. The overall ORR and DCR were 28.1% (95% CI 22.6% to 34.1%), and 80.7% (95% CI 75.3% to 85.4%), respectively. Specifically, the ORR varied from 19.7% to 34.4% and the DCR differed from 81.7% to 90.0% in disease-specific advanced gynecological cancer. The median PFS was 6.1 months and ranged from 5.6 to 10.0 months in the overall and disease-specific advanced gynecological cancer, respectively. Larger cumulative dosage of anlotinib (&gt;700 mg) was in general associated with longer PFS in the overall and disease-specific advanced gynecological cancer. The most common adverse event related to anlotinib use was pain/arthralgia (18.3%). Conclusions: In conclusion, anlotinib holds promise in treating patients with advanced gynecological cancer, such as cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancer, with reasonable efficacy and tolerable safety.

A randomized trial of eribulin monotherapy versus eribulin plus anlotinib in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer

Eribulin mesylate is a novel, nontaxane, microtubule dynamics inhibitor. In this study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of eribulin versus eribulin plus the oral small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor anlotinib in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. In this single-center, open-label, phase II clinical study (NCT05206656) conducted in a Chinese hospital, patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracycline- or taxane-based chemotherapy were randomized (1 : 1) to receive eribulin alone or in combination with anlotinib. The primary efficacy endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). From June 2020 to April 2022, a total of 80 patients were randomly assigned to either eribulin monotherapy or eribulin plus anlotinib combination therapy, with 40 patients in each group. The data cut-off was 10 August 2022. The median PFS was 3.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8-5.5 months] for eribulin and 5.1 months (95% CI 4.5-6.9 months) for eribulin plus anlotinib (hazard ratio= 0.56, 95% CI 0.32-0.98; P= 0.04). The objective response rates were 32.5% versus 52.5% (P= 0.07), respectively, and disease control rates were 67.5% versus 92.5% (P= 0.01), respectively. Patients <50 years of age, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0, visceral metastasis, number of treatment lines of four or more, hormone receptor negative (triple-negative), and HER2 low expression appeared to benefit more from combined treatment. The most common adverse events in both groups were leukopenia (n= 28, 70.0%, patients in the eribulin monotherapy group versus n= 35, 87.5%, patients in the combination therapy group), aspartate aminotransferase elevations (n= 28, 70.0%, versus n= 35, 87.5%), neutropenia (n= 25, 62.5%, versus n= 31, 77.5%), and alanine aminotransferase elevations (n= 25, 62.5%, versus n= 30, 75.0%). Eribulin plus anlotinib can be considered an alternative treatment option for HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.

Penpulimab plus platinum-based chemotherapy combined with anlotinib in first-line treatment for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer: A single-arm, open-label phase Ⅱ study (ALTN-AK105-II-06).

e17512 Background: Penpulimab is a novel human immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) antibody. Anlotinib is a novel oral multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor and primary targeted to VEGFR, FGFR, PDGFR and c-Kit. ALTN-AK105-II-06 (ChiCTR2200062897) is a single-arm, open phase Ⅱ clinical trial aimed to assess the effiacy and safety of penpulimab plus chemotherapy combined with anlotinib as fist-line therapy for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer. Methods: Eligible adults with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer not previously treated with systemic chemotherapy and not amenable curative treatment, with CPS more than 1% PD-L1 expression, and ECOG 0-1 were considered eligible for enrolment. Patients received 2 cycles of penpulimab 200mg Q3W + chemotherapy (paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 + cisplatin 50 mg/m2 or carboplatin AUC 5) + anlotinib 10mg, following with penpulimab and anlotinib for maintenance therapy. Patients were treated on continuous 3 weeks of penpulimab for up to 2 years, until disease progression, or unacceptable toxicities. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), overall survival (OS), 6-month PFS, safety and quality of life. Results: From Sep 2022 to Feb 2023, 9 patients were recruited with a median age of 56.4 years (range: 45-66), FIGO histopathological stage IIB (33.3%), III (44.5%) and IV (22.2%) were enrolled. 22.2% patients had ECOG PS 0. At data cutoff date (Feb 02, 2023), 8 patients had at least one post treatment anti-tumor assessment. 1 (12.5%) patient achieved CR, 6 (75%) patients achieved PR and 1 (12.5%) patient NE. The ORR was 87.5%. Median PFS and OS were not reached. Grade ≥3 TRAEs incidence was 44.44%. The most common grade ≥3 TRAEs were hypertension (22.22%), leukopenia (11.11%), neutropenia (11.11%) and hypertriglyceridemia (11.11%). Conclusions: This chemo-less therapy of only 2 cycles of chemotherapy combined with penpulimab + anlotinib in first-line treatment, maintaining with penpulimab and anlotinib showed promising efficacy with a favourable toxicity profile for patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer. We will report more data in the future. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2200062897 .

Preclinical and early clinical data of ZN-1041 in combination with trastuzumab deruxtecan to treat breast cancer with or without CNS metastases.

1041 Background: While treatment options for advanced HER2+ breast cancer have improved, HER2+ breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) remain a clinical challenge warranting the development of additional, brain permeable HER2-targeted therapies. ZN-1041 is a brain permeable, selective HER2-targeted oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Preclinical studies have demonstrated efficacy and safety of ZN-1041 warranting clinical development alone and in combination with approved monoclonal antibodies or antibody drug conjugates for patients (pts) with HER2+ BCBM. Methods: Anti-tumor activity of ZN-1041 alone or in combination with trastuzumab emtansine (TDM1), trastuzumab deruxtecan (TDXd), or trastuzumab (H) plus pertuzumab (P) was evaluated in BT474 BM orthotopic xenograft models. ZN-A-1041-101-US (NCT05593094) is an on-going phase 1, multicenter, open-label study. The study comprises dose escalation of ZN-1041 monotherapy (Phase 1a) in pts with HER2+ solid tumors with or without BM, dose escalation (Phase 1b) and expansion (phase 1c) of ZN-1041 in combination with TDM1 (Arm 1), TDXd (Arm 2), or HP as maintenance therapy (Arm 3) in pts with HER2+ mBC with or without BM. The primary objectives were safety, tolerability and recommended phase 2 dose. The secondary objective includes pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary efficacy per RECIST 1.1. Results: Preclinically, ZN-1041 alone or combined with TDM1, TDXd or HP demonstrated significant improvement in intracranial tumor growth inhibition compared to TDM1, TDXd, or HP alone. As of data cutoff, Phase 1a (n = 7 pts) and Arm 2 of Phase 1b (n = 3 pts) were completed. Among 10 pts enrolled, 8 pts had received prior HER2 TKI. In Phase 1a, ZN-1041 was well tolerated with no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) or drug discontinuation due to toxicity up to a dose of 800 mg BID. Adverse reactions were mainly grade 1. The most common treatment related adverse reactions (TRAEs≥15%) were grade 1 nausea (43%) and vomiting (29%), with no ≥ grade 2 diarrhea reported. PK exposure was increased with dose escalation. In Phase 1a, one pt with mBC (without BM) achieved a confirmed partial response (PR) at 400 mg BID dose for &gt; 15 months; one with gastric cancer achieved stable disease at the first dose level of 50mg BID for nearly 1 year. In Phase 1b, pts who had previously progressed on TDXd and/or TKI were enrolled and received ZN-1041 at a dose of 800 mg BID in combination with TDXd. Combination therapy was well tolerated with no DLTs reported. One pt with BCBM who was previously on tucatinib and TDXd had a confirmed PR. Conclusions: Safety and tolerability was observed for ZN-1041 with maximum tolerated dose 800 mg BID as monotherapy and combined with TDXd in pts with advanced HER2+ malignancies. Encouraging efficacy was observed in treatment-refractory settings. Additional safety and efficacy data of ZN-1041 in combination with TDM1, TDXd or HP are warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT05593094 .

Subgroup analyses of safety and efficacy by number and types of prior lines of treatment in FRESCO-2, a global phase III study of fruquintinib in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

3604 Background: Effective treatment options are limited for patients (pts) with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Fruquintinib (F), a highly selective, potent, oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFR-1, -2, and -3, was evaluated in the global phase III FRESCO-2 study (NCT04322539) and demonstrated a clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in OS and PFS with a favorable safety profile. Here we report subgroup analyses of efficacy and safety by prior lines (PL) and types of anti-cancer treatment (Tx) for metastatic disease (MD). Methods: FRESCO-2 was conducted in the US, Europe, Japan &amp; Australia, comparing F + best supportive care (BSC) with Placebo (P) + BSC. Pts were given 5 mg PO, QD, 3 wks on, 1 wk off, in a 28-day cycle. Eligible pts received prior chemotherapy, anti-VEGF, and if RAS wild type, anti-EGFR therapies; if BRAFV600E mutant or MSI-H, and appropriate targeted regimen; and had progressed on, or were intolerant to, trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) and/or regorafenib (R). Subgroup (sbgrps) analyses for efficacy and safety were performed according to number of prior lines of tx (LOT) and by types of therapy. Results: A total of 691 pts were randomized; F:461 vs P:230. The median number of prior lines of anti-cancer tx for metastatic disease F vs P was 4 (2, 16) vs 4 (2, 12). F improved OS and PFS compared to P for all sbgrps and prior tx for MD, consistent with those of the ITT population (pop). (Table: OS reported by sbgrps and prior tx for MD). Occurrence of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events were generally balanced between F vs P and consistent across all subgroups. The most common ≥ G3 AEs in ≥5% of pts on F within majority of sbgrps were hypertension, asthenia and palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia and were consistent with the overall safety population. Additional analyses based on duration of prior anti-VEGF and last therapy prior to F will be presented at the conference. Conclusions: F demonstrated clinically meaningful improvement in OS, PFS with an acceptable safety profile across all sbgrps. These results were consistent with the effect observed in the overall population; irrespective of previous tx with anti-VEGF, anti-EGFR, TAS-102 and R further supporting F as a potential new tx option for pts with refractory mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT04322539 . [Table: see text]

A phase IV study to evaluate the safety of fruquintinib in Chinese real-world clinical practice.

e15568 Background: Fruquintinib is a highly selective, potent, oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFR-1, -2, and -3, which was approved in China for 3L mCRC patients based on results of FRESCO study (NCT02314819). In addition, FRESCO-2 (NCT04322539) demonstrated a consistent efficacy and safety profile of Fruquintinib in more heavily treated mCRC worldwide patients. This Phase IV study aims to evaluate the safety of Fruquintinib in real-world clinical practice in China. Methods: This is a prospective, multicenter, phase IV study, to evaluate a real-world safety of Fruquintinib in China. Patients who are within the first cycle of Fruquintinib treatment or plan to use Fruquintinib within 1 week can be enrolled into this study. Three visits are scheduled, including the day of consent, 1 month after consent, and 6 months after consent or 30 days after the last dose (whichever occurs first). The primary endpoint is the collected AE. Results: From April 2019 to Feb 2022, a total of 3005 patients from 96 study sites received at least one dose of fruquintinib and were enrolled in the safety analysis set (SS). The median age of the patients was 60, of which 1053 patients (35.0%) were ≥65.In SS, a total of 1923 patients (64.0%) started Fruquintinib at 5 mg/day. The median relative dose intensity was 85.3%; the median exposure time was 2.7months. In SS, 2291 patients (76.2%) reported TEAEs; 1901 patients (63.3%) reported investigator assessed fruquintinib-related TEAEs.718 patients (23.9%) reported ≥Grade3 TEAEs; 418 patients (13.9%) reported investigator assessed fruquintinib-related ≥Grade3 TEAEs. 330 patients (11.0%) reported SAE; 86 patients (2.9%) reported investigator assessed fruquintinib-related SAE. 169 patients (5.6 %) reported TEAEs leading to death;8 patients (0.3%) reported investigator assessed fruquintinib-related TEAEs leading to death. The most frequent fruquintinib-related TEAEs(＞10%）include palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (PPES,19.4%)，hypertension (15.6%) &amp; fatigue (10.1%); the most frequent Fruquintinib-related≥Grade 3 TEAE (≥1%）include hypertension (6.4%) &amp; PPES (2.2%); The most frequent fruquintinib-related TEAE (≥5%) leading to dose modification was PPES (5.4%). Conclusions: The results are consistent with the fruquintinib safety profile observed in existing clinical studies. No new or significant safety signals were identified. Clinical trial information: NCT04005066 .