The global campaign has resulted in a 99% decline in paralytic poliomyelitis since 1988, using, predominantly, trivalent oral polio vaccine (OPV). While poliovirus type 2 has been eradicated, endemic disease with type 1 and 3 polioviruses persists in some areas, notably in India and Nigeria. This is because of low vaccine coverage, although low efficacy of trivalent OPV may also be responsible. Two recent studies compared monovalent and trivalent OPV.1,2 In Nigeria,1 a case control study of 3624 persons with type 1 paralytic poliomyelitis estimated the field effectiveness of one dose of either monovalent type 1 vaccine or trivalent vaccine to be 67% and 16%, respectively. Trivalent OPV was only 18% effective against type 3 paralytic poliomyelitis, but too few doses of monovalent type 3 vaccine were given to assess its effectiveness.1 In Egypt,2 the immunogenicity of a birth dose of oral monovalent type 1 vaccine was superior to trivalent OPV; 55% and 32% seroconversion rates, respectively. In addition, fewer babies who received the monovalent vaccine shed type 1 virus after a challenge dose of oral monovalent vaccine at 30 days of age (26% vs. 42% with trivalent OPV). These two studies support the potential benefit of using monovalent oral poliomyelitis vaccines to eliminate disease transmission in remaining endemic areas. However, maintaining high vaccine coverage, with whatever vaccines are used, remains a challenge. Submitted by: Dr. Kristine Macartney (kristinm@chw.edu.au) This is an extremely important paper. The usual reasons for not continuing antibiotic treatment in newborns with sterile blood cultures was to prevent selection of resistant organisms and to prevent systemic fungal infection. This is a large 4-year, retrospective, multi-centre cohort study of extremely low-birthweight babies (<1000 g). Included babies (n= 4039) received antibiotics within 3 days of birth, had sterile blood cultures and survived for 5 days or more. Babies who received prolonged antibiotic therapy, defined as five or more days of antibiotics, despite negative blood cultures, were compared with babies whose antibiotics were stopped earlier. There was predictable selection bias: babies who received prolonged antibiotics were sicker, less mature, had lower Apgar scores, and were more likely to be black. However, after adjusting for these factors in multivariate analyses, babies given prolonged antibiotics had increased mortality (odds ratio (OR) 1.46, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.19 to 1.78). In addition, of those babies intubated for 7 days, prolonged antibiotics were associated with increased mortality (OR 1.42, 1.13 to 1.80), and increased incidence of necrotising enterocolitis (OR 1.50, 1.11 to 2.02). Only 22 babies needed to be treated (Number Needed to Harm) with prolonged antibiotics for one extra baby to die, or develop NEC. Causes of death were unspecified, and mechanism of harm from prolonged antibiotics remains unknown. However, the authors speculate that alteration of bowel microflora may contribute. Of particular interest, a Cochrane review reported that probiotics can protect newborns against NEC and death, perhaps through a similar mechanism. (http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/cochrane/clsysrev/articles/CD005496/frame.html). Link: http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/123/1/58 Submitted by: David Isaacs, davidi@chw.edu.au Warts are known to be common in primary schoolchildren. Generations of schoolchildren have been forced by schools to wear footwear at the swimming pool or in showers to prevent transmission. A Dutch study examined the hands and feet of 1465 children aged 4 to 12 years and found that 33% of children had warts. Plantar warts were commonest (20% of children), while 9% had hand warts and 4% had both. A questionnaire, answered by 76% of parents, found no correlation between environmental factors connected to barefoot activities, public showers or swimming pool visits, and the presence of warts. Children with a family member with warts had twice the risk of having warts and the other risk factor was a high prevalence of warts in the child's school class. There are good safety reasons for children to wear footwear in showers and by the pool, but preventing warts is not one of them. Submitted by David Isaacs (davidi@chw.edu.au)