Oral Desipramine Research Articles

Pharmacological Treatments for Localized Provoked Vulvodynia: A Scoping Review

Introduction Localized provoked vulvodynia (LPV) is a chronic pain condition without an identifiable cause that is localized to a portion of the vulva and provoked by pressure or touch. LPV is a commonly occurring but poorly understood condition lacking consensus on management. Method This scoping review used Arksey and O’Malley’s approach to identify and evaluate literature published between 2010 and 2023 that addressed the question: What is the current evidence on the efficacy or effectiveness of pharmacological treatments in the management of LPV? Results This review evaluated 18 papers reporting on the efficacy or effectiveness of oral, topical, and injectable medications. Seven of the studies were randomized controlled trials. Oral gabapentin and oral desipramine showed some improvement in sexual function compared to placebo. Small sample sizes and methodological issues limited confidence in interpreting findings. Pain was reduced in descriptive studies of tricyclic antidepressants, milnacipran, injectable anesthetics, and botulinum toxin. Where pain did not improve with treatment, some oral medications improved participants’ mood and sexual function. Some topical agents may be effective in reducing peripherally mediated neuropathic pain. Botulinum toxin was the most well-studied injectable but yielded mixed outcomes related to pain, quality of life, and sexual function. Conclusion There is a lack of convincing evidence to draw conclusions about the efficacy or effectiveness of pharmacological therapies for LPV. The breadth of therapies for treating LPV warrants the development of evidence-based, consensus guidelines for measuring treatment outcomes and improving comparisons across studies. Recommendations for research include addressing methodological shortcomings and diversifying the participant pool to increase the generalizability of findings.

Evaluation and Treatment of Vulvodynia: State of the Science.

Vulvodynia affects 7% of American women, yet clinicians often lack awareness of its presentation. It is underdiagnosed and often misdiagnosed as vaginitis. The etiology of vulvodynia remains unknown, making it difficult to identify or develop effective treatment methods. The purpose of this article is to (1) review the presentation and evaluation of vulvodynia, (2) review the research on vulvodynia treatments, and (3) aid the clinician in the selection of vulvodynia treatment methods. The level of evidence to support vulvodynia treatment varies from case series to randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Oral desipramine with 5% lidocaine cream, intravaginal diazepam tablets with intravaginal transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS), botulinum toxin type A 50 units, enoxaparin sodium subcutaneous injections, intravaginal TENS (as a single therapy), multimodal physical therapy, overnight 5% lidocaine ointment, and acupuncture had the highest level of evidence with at least one RCT or comparative effectiveness trial. Pre to posttest reduction in vulvar pain and/or dyspareunia in non-RCT studies included studies of gabapentin cream, amitriptyline cream, amitriptyline with baclofen cream, up to 6 weeks' oral itraconazole therapy, multimodal physical therapy, vaginal dilators, electromyography biofeedback, hypnotherapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, cold knife vestibulectomy, and laser therapy. There is a lack of rigorous RCTs with large sample sizes for the treatment of vulvodynia, rendering it difficult to determine efficacy of most treatment methods. Clinicians will be guided in the selection of best treatments for vulvodynia that have the highest level of evidence and are least invasive.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of treatment modalities for vestibulodynia in women

Objective: To quantify the effects of available treatments of vestibulodynia.Methods: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in six search engines until December 2018, comparing any intervention vs. placebo or sham in women with vestibulodynia. Primary outcome was dyspareunia assessed with visual analogue (VAS) or numeric rating (NRS) scales. Secondary outcomes were daily vestibular symptoms (DVS), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) and Index of Sexual Satisfaction (ISS). Effects were described as mean differences (MDs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Traditional and frequentist network meta-analyses (NMA) were performed using random effect models.Results: Four RCTs (n = 275) were included evaluating vaginal cream of conjugated oestrogens, oral desipramine with or without topical lidocaine, topical lidocaine, laser therapy and transcranial direct current. In traditional MA, interventions did not reduce dyspareunia (MD = 0.08; 95%CI = −0.49 to 0.64), DVS (MD = −0.04; 95%CI = −0.31 to 0.24; 4 interventions), or MPQ (MD = −0.17; 95%CI = −2.16 to 1.81; 4 interventions). ISS was significantly improved (MD = −5.14; 95%CI = −9.52 to −0.75). In NMA, oral desipramine with or without lidocaine significantly improved ISS vs. other treatments.Conclusions: Several existing interventions were not associated with improvements in vestibulodynia. There only was improvement of sexual function with oral desipramine with or without lidocaine.

Oral Desipramine and Topical Lidocaine for Vulvodynia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Oral Desipramine and Topical Lidocaine for Vulvodynia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Oral Desipramine and Topical Lidocaine for Vulvodynia

To estimate the efficacy of common treatments for vulvodynia: topical lidocaine monotherapy, oral desipramine monotherapy, and lidocaine-desipramine combined therapy. A 12-week randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial was conducted on 133 vulvodynia-afflicted women assigned to four treatment arms: placebo tablets-placebo cream, desipramine tablets-placebo cream, placebo tablets-lidocaine cream, and desipramine tablets-lidocaine cream. The tampon test was selected as primary end point using a modified intention-to-treat analysis. Twelve secondary end points were also examined. At completion of the 12-week randomized phase, women were examined "open label" through 52 weeks postrandomization. All treatment arms reported substantial tampon-test pain reduction: 33% reduction placebo cream-placebo tablet, 20% reduction lidocaine cream-placebo tablet, 24% reduction placebo cream-desipramine tablet, and 36% reduction lidocaine cream-desipramine tablet. Compared with placebo, we found no significant difference in tampon-test pain reduction with desipramine (t=0.90; P=.37) or lidocaine (t=1.27; P=.21). Of the remaining 12 outcome measures, only the Index of Sexual Satisfaction, improved with desipramine compared with placebo (t=-2.81; P=.006). During the open-label phase, women undergoing vestibulectomy surgery reported significantly improved pain as measured by cotton swab test and the McGill Pain Scale compared with nonsurgical alternatives. Oral desipramine and topical lidocaine, as monotherapy or in combination, failed to reduce vulvodynia pain more than placebo. Placebo or placebo-independent effects are behind the substantial pain improvement seen in all treatment allocations. ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00276068. I.

The Tampon Test for Vulvodynia Treatment Outcomes Research

A standardized tampon insertion and removal test, the Tampon Test provides an alternative to sexual intercourse pain as an outcome measure for vulvodynia research. We report upon the reliability, validity, and responsiveness to change of the Tampon Test as an outcome measure for vulvodynia clinical trials. Outcome measures were assessed in women enrolled in the Vulvar Vestibulitis Clinical Trial, a randomized clinical trial of oral desipramine and topical lidocaine effectiveness. Reliability estimates of the Tampon Test using the Kappa statistic evaluated week-to-week measures at baseline. Tampon Test construct and discriminant validity were assessed through correlation with other outcome measures. Patients' ability to regularly perform the Tampon Test was compared with regularity of reporting intercourse pain. During the 2-week baseline phase, women with vulvodynia reported stable mean Tampon Test scores 4.6+/-2.6 (week -2); 4.6+/-2.7 (week -1); and 4.7+/-2.8 (week 0) with moderate week-to-week reliability (weighted Kappa 0.52). Over an 8-week phase of trial intervention, change in the Tampon Test measure significantly correlated to a number of outcome measures, including daily pain (r=0.42), intercourse pain (r=0.35), cotton swab vestibular pain (r=0.38), and the Brief Pain Inventory (r=0.49). Women with vulvodynia study participants performed the Tampon Test 96.3% of the requested time, which was twofold higher adherence than intercourse pain measurement (49.7%). The Tampon Test reflects a real life experience that is reliable, with good construct validity as shown by the breadth of correlated outcome measures. The Tampon Test is an appropriate outcome measure for vulvodynia research that can be considered for use as the primary efficacy endpoint in clinical trials of treatments for vulvodynia. ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00276068 II.

Disposition of desipramine, a sensitive cytochrome P450 2D6 substrate, when coadministered with intravenous temsirolimus

Intravenous (i.v.) temsirolimus, a novel inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), is approved for treatment of renal cell carcinoma. In vitro studies with pooled human liver microsomes showed that temsirolimus and its principal metabolite, sirolimus, inhibit the CYP2D6 isozyme (K(i) = 1.5 and 5 microM, respectively), indicating potential for pharmacokinetic interaction with agents that are substrates of CYP2D6. This 2-period study in healthy subjects investigated the pharmacokinetics of a single oral 50-mg dose of the CYP2D6 substrate desipramine, first without and subsequently with a single coadministered i.v. 25-mg dose of temsirolimus. The study population consisted of 25 males and 1 female; 10 were black, 12 were white, and 4 were of other races. Plasma and whole blood samples were available from all 26 subjects in period 1 following oral desipramine and from 23 subjects in period 2 following oral desipramine and i.v. temsirolimus coadministration. The 90% confidence intervals for least squares geometric mean ratios of desipramine and 2-hydroxy-desipramine C(max), AUC(T), and AUC were within 80-125%, indicating that parameter differences did not manifest into clinically relevant exposure changes. A single i.v. 25-mg dose of temsirolimus, alone or with desipramine, was well tolerated in healthy subjects. A single i.v. 25-mg dose of temsirolimus did not alter disposition of desipramine. Temsirolimus i.v. 25 mg may be safely administered with agents metabolized through the CYP2D6 pathway, but vigilance for drug interaction is warranted in patients with advanced malignancies.

The Effect of Chronic Oral Desipramine on Capsaicin-Induced Allodynia and Hyperalgesia: A Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study

The tricyclic antidepressants are often used for the treatment of neuropathic pain. In this study, we evaluated one of these drugs on human cutaneous experimental pain. A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover design methodology was conducted. Subjects participated in 2 14-day study sessions separated by a 7-day washout period. One session was with desipramine and one with placebo. At baseline, Day 7, and Day 15, quantitative sensory testing was performed to thermal and mechanical stimuli. On Day 15 only, intradermal capsaicin was injected on the volar aspect of the forearm followed by an assessment of pain and hyperalgesia. Oral desipramine had no significant effect on acute sensory thresholds, pain, secondary hyperalgesia, or flare response induced by intradermal capsaicin. Mean peak plasma levels of desipramine were within the therapeutic range for the treatment of depression. This study further supports a lack of effect of the tricyclic antidepressants on acute nociception and experimentally-induced secondary hyperalgesia.

Relationship between plasma desipramine levels, CYP2D6 phenotype and clinical response to desipramine: a prospective study.

The clinical relevance of the CYP2D6 oxidation polymorphism in the treatment of depression with desipramine (DMI) was studied prospectively in depressed outpatients. After CYP2D6 phenotype determination with dextromethorphan, 31 patients were treated with oral DMI at a dosage of 100 mg per day for 3 weeks. At the end of the 3rd week of treatment, severity of depressive symptoms was assessed by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and steady-state plasma concentrations of DMI and its metabolite 2-hydroxydesipramine (2-OH-DMI) were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Plasma DMI levels were significantly correlated with dextromethorphan metabolic ratio. The two patients with the poor metabolizer phenotype showed the highest plasma concentrations of DMI and complained of severe adverse effects, requiring dosage reduction. No significant correlation was found between plasma levels of either DMI or DMI plus 2-OH-DMI and antidepressant effect. These findings indicate that the dextromethorphan metabolic ratio has a great impact on steady-state plasma levels of DMI in depressed patients and may identify subjects at risk for severe concentration-dependent adverse effects. On the other hand, this index of CYP2D6 activity does not seem to predict the degree of clinical amelioration.

Positron emission tomographic imaging of cardiac sympathetic Innervation using 6-[18F]Fluorodopamine: Initial findings in humans

Objectives. This study evaluated the safety, efficacy and validity of 6-[18F]fluorodopamine positron emission tomographic scanning of cardiac sympathetic innervation and function in humans.Methods. Positron emission tomographic (PET) scans, arterial blood and urine were obtained after a 3-min intravenous infusion of 6-[18F]fluorodopamine (1 to 4 mCi, 188 to 809 mCi/mmol) in healthy volunteers, with or without pretreatment with oral desipramine to inhibit neuronal uptake of catecholamines.Results. 6-[18F]Fluorodopamine PET scanning visualized the left ventricular myocardium. Blood pressure increased slightly and transiently. The estimated absorbed radiation dose to the main target organ, the wall of the urinary bladder, was 0.8 to 1.0 rad/mCi of injected 6-[18F]fluorodopamine. By 24 h after the injection, the main 6F-compound in urine was 6F-vanillylmandelic acid, a metabolite of 6F-norepinephrine. Desipramine attenuated accumulation of myocardial 6-[18F]fluorodopamine-derived radioactivity and plasma 6Fdihydroxyphenylacetic acid.Conclusions. 6-[18F]Fluorodopamine produces negligible hemodynamic effects and acceptable radiation exposure at doses that visualize the left ventricular myocardium. Sympathetic nerves take up 6-[18F]fluorodopamine, which is translocated from the axoplasm into storage vesicles, where is it beta-hydroxylated to the fluorinated analogue of the sympathetic neurotransmitter norepinephrine. Therefore, the basis for visualization of myocardium after 6-[18F]fluorodopamine injection in humans is radiolabeling by 6-[18F]fluorodopamine and 6-[18F]fluoronorepinephrine of vesicles in sympathetic terminals. 6-[18F]Fluorodopamine PET scanning provides a novel means for assessing sympathetic innervation and function noninvasively in the human heart.

Effects of desipramine on norepinephrine clearance in congestive heart failure

Elevated plasma norepinephrine (NE) in congestive heart failure (CHF) is caused by increased NE spillover and decreased NE clearance. To evaluate the effects of neuronal uptake blockade on NE clearance, we studied NE kinetics during steady-state infusions of [3H]NE, before and after oral desipramine (DMI, 50 mg) in 11 patients with CHF and 8 normal volunteers. Baseline plasma NE was greater in the CHF group (637 +/- 56 vs. 271 +/- 32 pg/ml; P less than 0.001), NE clearance was lower in CHF (1.31 +/- 0.21 vs. 1.94 +/- 0.17 l.min-1.m-2; P = 0.026), and NE spillover was greater in CHF (4.71 +/- 0.78 vs. 3.04 +/- 0.35 nmol.min-1.m-2, P = 0.054). After DMI, plasma NE rose significantly in CHF (778 +/- 67; P = 0.008), and NE clearance decreased further in CHF (0.97 +/- 0.16; P = 0.024), but neither changed in normal subjects. NE spillover did not change in either group. There appears to be an enhanced effect of DMI on NE clearance in CHF patients. Two general mechanisms may be responsible for this finding, an increased concentration of drug, possibly caused by a decreased volume of distribution, and an increased sensitivity of neuronal amine pumps to DMI. Both mechanisms may reflect a more general abnormality of clearance of drugs and hormones related to abnormalities of tissue perfusion in CHF.

Neuroendocrine challenge tests in depression: a study of growth hormone, TRH and cortisol release

Thirty drug-free patients fulfilling the DSM-III criteria for major depression serially underwent the dexamethasone suppression test (DST), thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) test and a growth hormone (GH) challenge test with oral desipramine. Fifty-three per cent of the sample showed a blunted GH response, 47% were DST non-suppressors while 26% had a blunted TSH response. Eighty per cent of patients showed some biological abnormality. There was no clear association between any of these abnormalities. Neither was there any association between the neuroendocrine parameters studied and the severity of depression or patient gender. There was a trend for increasing GH blunting and DST non-suppression with increasing age.

Duration of the suppressive effect of tricyclic antidepressants on histamine-induced wheal-and-flare reactions in human skin

The antihistaminic properties of the tricyclic antidepressants have been recognized since these compounds were first developed. Antidepressants, which are equally effective for treating depression or used in the treatment of chronic urticaria, have varying in vitro antihistaminic properties. We compared the duration of H 1-receptor blockade by two tricyclic antidepressants, doxepin (the most potent antihistamine) and desipramine (the least potent antihistamine), in a single dose, double-blind, noncrossover study. After baseline prick test with histamine phosphate 1:1000 by Multitest (Lincoln Diagnostics, Decatur, Ill.), the suppression of cutaneous histamine-induced wheal-and-flare responses were measured daily for 7 days in 33 healthy volunteers who were randomly administered a single 25 mg dose of oral desipramine or doxepin. Significant differences in the suppression of the wheal-and-flare responses to histamine between the two drugs were noted ( p < 0.05) during the first 3 days. Desipramine suppressed the wheal for 2 days and flare for 1 day. Doxepin suppressed the wheal for 4 days and flare for 6 days. Our results suggest doxepin should be withheld for at least 7 days before allergy skin testing.

Chronic treatment with antidepressant drugs and the analgesia induced by 5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine: attenuation by desipramine.

The effect of chronic and acute oral or intraperitoneal treatment with the antidepressant drugs, desipramine, amitriptyline, alaproclate and iprindole, upon pain thresholds in the tail flick, hot plate and shock titration tests of nociception in saline- and 5-MeODMT-treated rats was studied. Chronic desipramine treatment increased the pre-test tail flick latencies. In the saline-treated rats, chronic oral desipramine treatment increased tail flick latencies, whereas chronic oral amitriptyline treatment decreased tail flick latencies. In 5-MeODMT-treated rats, chronic oral desipramine treatment attenuated the effects of 5-MeODMT (1 mg/kg) in all three tests of nociception, whereas chronic amitriptyline caused a potentiation in the tail flick and hot plate tests. Chronic oral iprindole treatment attenuated 5-MeODMT-induced analgesia in the hot plate test. Chronic intraperitoneal desipramine treatment attenuated 5-MeODMT analgesia in the tail flick and shock titration tests. In a different chronic treatment experiment, oral desipramine treatment attenuated 5-MeODMT analgesia in the tail flick test and zimeldine did for both the tail flick and hot plate tests, whereas mianserin potentiated 5-MeODMT-induced analgesia in both the tail flick and hot plate tests. In the saline-treated rats, acute treatment with all four drugs, desipramine, amitriptyline, iprindole and alaproclate, elevated the shock thresholds, whereas in 5-MeODMT-treated rats, desipramine and amitriptyline elevated shock thresholds. Two main conclusions can be drawn: chronic desipramine caused a quite consistent attenuation of 5-MeODMT-induced analgesia and the effects of acute treatment differed strongly from that of the chronic treatment. The effects of chronic administration with these antidepressants were compared with other findings using different measures of behavioural and receptor function.