Oral Corticosteroid Dose Research Articles

Long-Term Effectiveness of Anti-IL-4R Therapy Following Suboptimal Response to Anti-IL-5/5R Therapy in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma

Dupilumab is an anti-IL-4R monoclonal antibody (mAb) with proven efficacy in severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA). A suboptimal response to anti-IL-5/5R mAbs is seen in some patients with ongoing evidence of type 2 (T2) inflammation. To understand whether targeting IL-13 pathways with dupilumab in these patients may lead to better clinical outcomes. We performed a retrospective analysis of the extended clinical effectiveness of dupilumab up to 2 years of treatment in patients with SEA who had not responded adequately to anti-IL-5/5R biologics. The ability to achieve clinical remission and the change in the remission domains of exacerbation rate (AER), maintenance oral corticosteroid dose (mOCS), lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second), and asthma control (Asthma Control Questionnaire 6) were recorded. Thirty-seven patients (mean age 41 years, 70% female) were included in the analysis. The mean (standard deviation) AER fell by almost 90% from 3.16 (1.28) at dupilumab initiation to 0.35 (0.72) after 1 year. The median (interquartile range) mOCS dose (n= 20) fell from 10 (5-25) mg to 0 (0-5) mg at 1 year, with 14 of 20 (70%) able to stop prednisolone altogether. Clinical remission was achieved in 16 of 37 (43%). Patients who achieved remission had a higher pre-IL-5/5R fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) level (85 [39-198] parts per billion [ppb] vs 75 [42-96] ppb, P= .03). Significant improvements in clinical outcomes are possible after a switch to dupilumab in patients experiencing a suboptimal response to anti-IL-5/5R therapies. A higher FeNO in poor responders to anti-IL-5/5R who achieve remission with dupilumab is suggestive of an IL-13-driven subphenotype of T2-high asthma in which the eosinophil appears unlikely to play a key role in the disease pathogenesis.

Long-term multicenter comparison shows equivalent efficacy of monoclonal antibodies in severe asthma therapy

BackgroundMonoclonal antibodies (biologics) drastically changed severe asthma therapy. Mepolizumab (anti-interleukin (IL) 5), benralizumab (anti-IL5 receptor alpha), and dupilumab (anti-IL4/13) are the most used biologics in this context. While all biologics are efficient individually, the choice of biologic is complicated by insufficient data on their comparative long-term treatment efficacy. Here, we compare the real-life efficacy of these biologics in asthma therapy over 12 months.Methods280 severe asthma patients treated with mepolizumab (129/280, 46%), benralizumab (83/280, 30%) or dupilumab (68/280, 24%) for one year were analyzed retrospectively. Data were collected at baseline and after 6 and 12 months of therapy. Endpoints were changes pulmonary function (PF), exacerbation rate, oral corticosteroid (OCS) use and dose, asthma control test (ACT) score and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) levels as well as responder status measured by the recently published “Biologic Asthma Response Score” (BARS).ResultsAll biologics led to significant improvements in PF, ACT and OCS dose. Only Mepolizumab and Benralizumab significantly decreased the exacerbation rate, while only Mepolizumab and Dupilumab significantly decreased FeNO. Responder rates measured by BARS were high across all groups: roughly half of all patients achieved full response and most of the remainder achieved at least partial responder status. Overall, outcomes were similar between groups after both 6 and 12 months.ConclusionsAll biologics showed great efficacy in individual parameters and high responder rates measured by BARS without a clinically relevant advantage for any antibody. Response was usually achieved after 6 months and retained at 12 months, emphasizing the utility of early response assessment.

Sustained Effectiveness of Benralizumab in Naïve and Biologics-Experienced Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Patients: Results from the ANANKE Study.

Severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) patients often present overlapping inflammatory features rendering them eligible for multiple biologic therapies; switching biologic treatment is a strategy adopted to optimize asthma control when patients show partial or no response to previous biologics. ANANKE is a retrospective, multicenter Italian study (NCT04272463). Here, we outline the characteristics and long-term clinical outcomes in naïve-to-biologics and biologics-experienced patients treated with benralizumab for up to 96 weeks. Bio-experienced patients were split into omalizumab and mepolizumab subsets according to the type of biologic previously used. A total of 124 (76.5%) naïve and 38 (23.5%) bio-experienced patients were evaluated at index date; 13 patients (34.2%) switched from mepolizumab, 21 patients (55.3%) switched from omalizumab, and four patients (10.5%) received both biologics. The mepolizumab subset was characterized by the longest SEA duration (median of 4.6 years), the highest prevalence of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) (76.5%), and the greatest oral corticosteroid (OCS) daily dosage (median of 25 mg prednisone equivalent). The omalizumab group showed the highest severe annual exacerbation rate (AER) (1.70). At 96 weeks, treatment with benralizumab reduced any and severe AER by more than 87% and 94%, respectively, across all groups. Lung function was overall preserved, with major improvements observed in the mepolizumab group, which also revealed a 100% drop of the median OCS dose. Asthma Control Test (ACT) score improved in the naïve group while its increment was more variable in bio-experienced patients; among these, a marked difference was noticed between omalizumab and mepolizumab subsets (median ACT score of 23.5 and 18, respectively). Benralizumab promotes durable and profound clinical benefits in naïve and bio-experienced groups, indicating that a nearly complete depletion of eosinophils is highly beneficial in the control of SEA, independently of previous biologic use.

Real-World Effectiveness of Mepolizumab in Patients with Allergic and Non-Allergic Asthma.

Real-world data on mepolizumab in patients with severe asthma and allergic and non-allergic phenotypes are limited. This study investigated the effectiveness of mepolizumab treatment in patients with severe asthma with allergic and non-allergic phenotypes. This retrospective cohort study (GSK ID: 214148) used administrative claims data from the Optum Research Database. Eligible patients were ≥6 years of age with asthma and had ≥2 mepolizumab claims post-index. Index date was the first mepolizumab claim/administration (January 2016-December 2018). Patients were divided into two cohorts: allergic and non-allergic asthma, based on diagnosis codes, medication use and lab test results. Outcomes included the rate of asthma-related exacerbations and oral corticosteroid (OCS) use during the 12 months before (baseline period) and 12 months after (follow-up period) mepolizumab initiation. Study ended in December 2019. Overall, 240 (44.6%) and 298 (55.4%) patients were included in the allergic and non-allergic asthma cohorts, respectively. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) counts of asthma-related exacerbations were significantly reduced from baseline to follow-up in both the allergic and non-allergic asthma cohorts (3.2 [2.5] to 2.1 [2.1], p < 0.001 and 2.5 [2.2] to 1.7 [1.9], p < 0.001, respectively). The mean number of OCS pharmacy claims was significantly decreased by 33.3% and 41.4% from baseline to follow-up in the allergic and non-allergic cohorts, respectively (p < 0.001); mean daily OCS dose significantly decreased by 30.6% and 45.4%, respectively (p < 0.001) as well as the mean number of OCS bursts, which decreased by 44.9% and 41.8%, respectively (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between cohorts in reductions in asthma exacerbations, counts of OCS pharmacy claims or OCS bursts (baseline to follow-up). Mepolizumab significantly reduced asthma exacerbations and OCS use in patients with allergic and non-allergic asthma, suggesting that mepolizumab provides real-world benefit in severe asthma irrespective of whether a patient has an allergic phenotype.

Long-Term Safety and Effectiveness of Tacrolimus in Patients With Lupus Nephritis in Japan: 10-Year Analysis of the Real-World TRUST Study.

To assess the long-term safety and effectiveness of tacrolimus as maintenance therapy in patients with lupus nephritis (LN) receiving treatment in real-world clinical settings in Japan. An open-label, noncomparative, observational, prospective postmarketing surveillance study was conducted in 1395 patients with LN receiving maintenance treatment with tacrolimus at 278 medical institutions across Japan over a period of 10 years. Tacrolimus continuation rate and cumulative incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), relapse, progression to renal failure, and progression to dialysis were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Safety data were available for 1355 patients, almost half (49.3%) of whom remained on tacrolimus for the full 10 years of follow-up. A significant reduction in mean (SD) daily oral corticosteroid dose was observed from 16.0 (9.7) mg/day at 4 weeks after initiation of tacrolimus treatment to 7.2 (4.4) mg/day at year 10 (P < 0.001). The most frequently reported serious ADRs were infections (reported for 131 [9.7%] patients). Except for infections, no marked increase in the incidence of any other ADRs was seen over time, including renal impairment, malignant tumors, and cardiac dysfunction. Renal function was generally well maintained over the 10 years of follow-up. At year 10, cumulative rates of relapse, renal failure, and dialysis were 44.5%, 12.2%, and 4.5%, respectively. Tacrolimus was effective and generally well tolerated as maintenance therapy for LN in a large cohort of patients in Japan followed for 10 years, almost half of whom remained on therapy for the entire duration of follow-up. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01410747).

Association between oral corticosteroid starting dose and the incidence of pneumonia in Japanese patients with ulcerative colitis: a nation-wide claims database study.

A previous study demonstrated that half of patients started oral corticosteroids (OCS) for ulcerative colitis (UC) exacerbations at lower doses than recommended by Japanese treatment guidelines (initial OCS prednisolone equivalent dose, 30-40 mg). This may relate to physician's concern about infection, especially pneumonia including Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP), from high OCS doses. We assessed whether pneumonia incidence is increased with guideline-recommended OCS initial doses. This retrospective cohort study used the Japan Medical Data Center claims database (2012-2021). The whole cohort consisted of all UC patients who started OCS during the study period meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The matched cohort was created by propensity score matching; the lower (initial OCS dose < 30 mg), guideline-recommended (30-40 mg), and higher groups ( > 40 mg) in a 2:2:1 ratio. Pneumonia incidence in the primary analysis was evaluated in the matched cohort. A Poisson regression model determined pneumonia-related risk factors in the whole cohort. After screening, 3,349 patients comprised the whole cohort; 1,775 patients comprised the matched cohort (lower dose, n = 710; guideline-recommended dose, n = 710; higher dose, n = 355). The incidence of any pneumonia was low; no differences were observed in incidence rates across these dose subgroups. In total, 3 PJP cases were found in the whole cohort, but not detected in the matched cohort. Several risk factors for any pneumonia were identified, including age, higher comorbidities index, treatment in large facility and hospitalization. The incidence of pneumonia, including PJP, in UC patients was low across initial OCS dose treatment subgroups.

Clinical Remission in Patients Affected by Severe Eosinophilic Asthma on Dupilumab Therapy: A Long-Term Real-Life Study.

Background. Nowadays, highly selective biological drugs offer the possibility of treating severe type 2 asthma. However, in the real-life setting, it is crucial to confirm the validity of the chosen biological treatment by evaluating the achievement of clinical remission. Study purpose. The main aims of this real-life study were to evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab in terms of clinical, functional, and inflammatory outcomes at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months of treatment and to estimate the percentage of patients achieving partial or complete clinical remission at 12 and 24 months of treatment. In addition, we attempted to identify whether baseline clinical characteristics of patients could be associated with clinical remission at 24 months of treatment. Materials and methods. In this observational prospective study, 20 outpatients with severe uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma were prescribed dupilumab and followed-up after 6, 12, 18, and 24 months of treatment. At each patient visit, the need for oral corticosteroids (OCS) and corticosteroid required dose, number of exacerbations during the previous year or from the previous visit, asthma control test (ACT) score, pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in the 1st second (FEV1), fractional exhaled nitric oxide at a flow rate of 50 mL/s (FeNO50), and blood eosinophil count were assessed. Results. The number of OCS-dependent patients was reduced from 10 (50%) at baseline to 5 (25%) at one year (T12) and 2 years (T24). The average dose of OCS required by patients demonstrated a significant reduction at T12 (12.5 ± 13.75 mg vs. 2.63 ± 3.94 mg, p = 0.015), remaining significant even at T24 (12.5 ± 13.75 mg vs. 2.63 ± 3.94 mg, p = 0.016). The number of exacerbators showed a statistically significant decrease at T24 (10 patients, 50% vs. 3 patients, 15%, p = 0.03). The mean number of exacerbations demonstrated a statistically significant reduction at T24 (1.45 ± 1.58 vs. 0.25 ± 0.43, p = 0.02). The ACT score improved in a statistically significant manner at T12 (15.30 ± 4.16 vs. 21.40 ± 2.35, p < 0.0001), improving further at T24 (15.30 ± 4.16 vs. 22.10 ± 2.59, p < 0.0001). The improvement in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 values reached statistical significance at T24 (79.5 ± 14.4 vs. 87.7 ± 13.8, p = 0.03). The reduction in flow at the level of the small airways (FEF25-75%) also demonstrated an improvement, although it did not reach statistical significance either at T12 or T24. A total of 11 patients (55%) showed clinical remission at T12 (6 complete + 5 partial) and 12 patients (60%) reached clinical remission at T24 (9 complete + 3 partial). Only obesity was associated with a negative odds ratio (OR) for achieving clinical remission at T24 (OR: 0.03, 95% CI: 0.002-0.41, p = 0.004). No other statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics emerged between patients who reached clinical remission at T24 and the group of patients who did not achieve this outcome. Conclusion. Dupilumab appears to be an effective drug in promoting achievement of clinical remission in patients with severe uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma. The achievement of clinical remission should be continuously evaluated during treatment. Further studies are needed to clarify whether certain baseline clinical characteristics can help predict dupilumab favorable outcomes.

Real-World Effectiveness of Biologics in Patients With Severe Asthma: Analysis of the KoSAR.

Severe asthma is associated with high morbidity and healthcare utilization; however, treatment options for these patients are limited. This study aimed to determine the therapeutic effects of biologics in clinical practice. This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included 136 patients who received biologics for at least 4 months between September 2017 and July 2022 at 25 medical centers affiliated with the Korean Severe Asthma Registry (KoSAR). The study evaluated the treatment effects, including acute exacerbation rates, maintenance of oral corticosteroid dosages, lung function, quality of life, blood eosinophil count, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) levels, by comparing measurements before and after 4 months of biologic treatment. Responses for each medication was evaluated based on the Global Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness score, and any adverse reactions were summarized. With the administration of biologics over the course of 4 months, there was a reduction in asthma acute exacerbations, a significant improvement in lung function, and a significant decrease in daily maintenance dose of oral steroid. Blood eosinophil counts decreased in the mepolizumab and reslizumab groups, while FeNO levels decreased only in the dupilumab group. The Asthma Control Test, Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adult Korean Asthmatics, and the EuroQol-visual analogue scale scores showed a significant improvement. Most patients (80.15%) responded to the biologic treatment. Meanwhile, non-responders often had chronic rhinosinusitis as a comorbidity, exhibited lower lung function, and required higher doses of oral steroids. No severe adverse events were reported. Biologics are highly effective in Korean patients with Type 2 severe asthma, significantly reducing acute exacerbation rates and doses of oral corticosteroids, while also improving lung function. Therefore, it seems beneficial to administer biologics without any restrictions to patients exhibiting Type 2 severe asthma.

Can dose reduction be made in patients with allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis receiving high-dose omalizumab treatment?

Background. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) is an endotype of severe asthma which frequently needs biologics for their steroid sparing effect. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of reducing the omalizumab dose in patients with ABPA who were on long-term omalizumab treatment. Methods. Once asthma was controlled, two approaches were used to reduce total monthly omalizumab dose: 1) both extending dose intervals from 2 to 4 weeks and decrease omalizumab dose, 2) to reduce omalizumab dose while keeping dose intervals stable. Results. Thirteen patients with ABPA (8F/5M, mean age 53.4 ± 13.0 years) were included. Pre-omalizumab, mean numbers of attacks and hospitalizations were 2.5 ± 1.5 and 1.3 ± 0.8, mean oral corticosteroid (OCS, as methylprednisolone) dose was 12.2 ± 10.4 mg daily. First omalizumab dose reduction was made to all patients at a median time of 35 months (min 13, max 47). The 2nd dose reduction was made in four patients at median of 23.5 months. Mean OCS decreased to 0.69 ± 0.95 mg/day (p = 0.001) in the 1st year of omalizumab, could be stopped in 11 patients in last evaluation. Attacks/hospitalizations decreased significantly to 0.31 ± 0.86 and 0, respectively, in the 1st year of omalizumab. Total omalizumab dose was reduced by median 40% (min 20, max 60) in 1st intervention and 50% (min 20, max 67) after 2nd intervention. After omalizumab dose reduction, asthma control did not deteriorate and there was no need to increase the omalizumab or OCS-dose. Conclusions. Decreasing the total omalizumab dose does not cause clinical deterioration in ABPA after the disease is controlled.

Depression: A Contributing Factor to the Clinical Course in Myasthenia Gravis Patients.

Background and Objectives: The association between myasthenia gravis (MG) and depression is intricate and characterized by bidirectional causality. In this regard, MG can be a contributing factor to depression and, conversely, depression may worsen the symptoms of MG. This study aimed to identify any differences in the progression of the disease among patients with MG who were also diagnosed with depression as compared to those without depression. Our hypothesis focused on the theory that patients with more severe MG symptoms may have a higher likelihood of suffering depression at the same time. Materials and Methods: One hundred twenty-two male and female patients (N = 122) aged over 18 with a confirmed diagnosis of autoimmune MG who were admitted to the Neurology II department of Myasthenia Gravis, Clinical Institute Fundeni in Bucharest between January 2019 and December 2020, were included in the study. Patients were assessed at baseline and after six months. The psychiatric assessment of the patients included the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 items (HAM-D), and neurological status was determined with two outcome measures: Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) and Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Life (MG-ADL). The patients were divided into two distinct groups as follows: group MG w/dep, which comprised 49 MG patients diagnosed with depressive disorder who were also currently receiving antidepressant medication, and group MG w/o dep, which consisted of 73 patients who did not have depression. Results: In our study, 40.16% of the myasthenia gravis (MG) patients exhibited a comorbid diagnosis of depression. Among the MG patients receiving antidepressant treatment, baseline assessments revealed a mean MG-ADL score of 7.73 (SD = 5.05), an average QMG score of 18.40 (SD = 8.61), and a mean Ham-D score of 21.53 (SD = 7.49). After a six-month period, a statistically significant decrease was observed in the MG-ADL (2.92, SD = 1.82), QMG (7.15, SD = 4.46), and Ham-D scores (11.16, SD = 7.49) (p < 0.0001). These results suggest a significant correlation between MG severity and elevated HAM-D depression scores. Regarding the MG treatment in the group with depression, at baseline, the mean dose of oral corticosteroids was 45.10 mg (SD = 16.60). Regarding the treatment with pyridostigmine, patients with depression and undergoing antidepressant treatment remained with an increased need for pyridostigmine, 144.49 mg (SD = 51.84), compared to those in the group without depression, 107.67 mg (SD = 55.64, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our investigation confirms that the occurrence of depressive symptoms is significantly widespread among individuals diagnosed with MG. Disease severity, along with younger age and higher doses of cortisone, is a significant factor associated with depression in patients with MG. Substantial reductions in MG-ADL and QMG scores were observed within each group after six months, highlighting the effectiveness of MG management. The findings suggest that addressing depressive symptoms in MG patients, in addition to standard MG management, can lead to improved clinical outcomes.

Eosinophil to lymphocyte ratio may predict OCS reduction and change in quality of life (AQLQ) resulting from asthma biological treatment

Objectives Simple clinical parameters that could be helpful in choice of monoclonal antibodies and prediction of their effectiveness are being sought. The aim was to assess if neutrophil-to-lymphocyte, eosinophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios may predict outcomes of biologic therapy for severe asthma. Methods Retrospective, single-center study including severe asthma patients treated with three different biologics. The blood ratios were assessed at initiation of treatment (point 0) and after six months (point 1). The chi-square test was used to analyze differences in nominal variables. Quantitative variables were compared by Student’s t-test, Mann–Whitney U or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Results 53 patients with severe asthma were included, among them 21 patients (40%) treated with omalizumab and 32 patients (60%) with mepolizumab or benralizumab. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios did not change during six-month-course of biological treatment. Eosinophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was higher at the point 0 (p = 0.016) in the group treated with anti-eosinophils than in the omalizumab group and lower at the point 1 (p = 0.006). In the anti-eosinophil group this ratio decreased between points 0 and 1 (p < 0.001). In the omalizumab group there was an inverse correlation between the initial ratio and oral corticosteroid dose reduction (rs = −0,67). In the a/eos group there were significant correlations between initial ratio and age (rs = 0.36), and ACQ (rs = −0.4) and ACQ (rs = 0.41) measured at the point 1. Conclusions Pretreatment eosinophil-to-lymphocyte ratio may predict oral corticosteroid dose reduction resulting from omalizumab treatment and change in quality of life and asthma control resulting from anti-IL-5 and IL-5R treatment.

Real-world safety andeffectiveness ofmepolizumab forpatients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis inJapan: A 48-week interim analysis ofthe MARS study.

The objective of the study is to assess real-world, long-term safety/effectiveness of mepolizumab for eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) in Japan. The Mepolizumab long-term study to Assess Real-world Safety and effectiveness of EGPA in Japan (MARS) (GSK ID: 213684/NCT04551989) is an ongoing 96-week study of patients with EGPA who received four-weekly mepolizumab 300 mg subcutaneously for ≥96 weeks before study entry (baseline) and continued treatment. This interim analysis included safety from baseline to Week 48 (observation period) and clinical outcomes before mepolizumab and during the observation period. Of 118 patients enrolled, 29% (34/118) experienced adverse events (AEs), of which 13% (15/118) experienced serious AEs; none were considered mepolizumab related. The median oral corticosteroid (OCS) dose decreased from 6.9 (pre-mepolizumab) to 3.0 (baseline) and 2.0 mg/day (Weeks 45-48); the proportion of patients receiving no OCS increased from 8% to 32% and 38%, respectively. Patients experiencing clinical symptoms decreased from 94% (pre-mepolizumab) to 73% (baseline) and 67% (Week 48). During the observation period, 5% of patients experienced EGPA relapse; the rates of EGPA-related hospitalisations, EGPA-related emergency room/unscheduled visits, and asthma exacerbations were 0.05, 0.09, and 0.08 event/person-year, respectively. The results of mepolizumab treatment for ≥144 weeks (before baseline plus observation) were consistent with the known safety profile and allowed OCS dose reduction while improving disease control versus pre-treatment among patients with EGPA.

Steroid-sparing effect of belimumab: results from a retrospective observational study of real-world data

ObjectiveComparison of oral corticosteroid (OCS) use in patients with SLE in a US rheumatology network pre- and post-belimumab initiation.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study (GSK Study 214140) used data from the Patient-Important...

Long-Term Follow-up of Hypereosinophilic Syndrome Patients Treated with Mepolizumab: A Nationwide Real-Life Study of 59 Patients

Background Mepolizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against IL-5, has proven efficacious for the treatment of FIP1L1 ∷ PDGFRA ( F/P)-negative Hypereosinophilic Syndrome (HES) in two randomized controlled trials with short term follow-up. However, both its efficacy and safety profiles on the long term are unknown. Methods All F/P-negative HES patient treated with mepolizumab in France from 2003 to 2022 in either GlaxoSmithKline-sponsored randomized trials (MHE100185 and HES200622) or long-term access programs (MHE100901 and MHE10417) were included. For each study visit, we retrospectively collected the following data: drug doses (and spacing), HES-disease status, absolute eosinophil counts (AEC), and doses of oral corticosteroids (OCS). Clinical remission (CR) was defined as the absence of symptoms related to HES. Complete hematological remission (CHR) was defined as an AEC &amp;lt; 0.5 x 10 9/L, and relapse by the occurrence of new or worsening of HES-related symptoms, irrespective of either AEC or increase of HES treatments. Relapse-free survival was modeled using a Kaplan-Meier method. We also assessed the rates of “super responses”, a new outcome measure defined as the combination of both CR, CHR and complete withdrawal of OCS at last follow-up. Results and discussion Data were available for 64 out of the 80 patients identified. All patients ultimately received 300mg subcutaneous mepolizumab, but 27 (45.8%) patients had initially been started on higher doses (700 or 750 mg intravenous). Five patients were excluded because of misdiagnoses despite initially high AEC and HES-mimicking presentation (IgG4-related disease (n=1), Castleman's disease (n=1), lymphoma (n=2) and STAT6 gain-of-function mutation (n=1)). Ultimately, the study population consisted of 59 patients (idiopathic HES, n=51; lymphocytic HES, n=8) with chronic HES sensitive to high-dose OCS yet who remained OCS-dependent on the long run (median [IQR] dose of OCS at baseline: 11 [9-20] mg/d). In median, patients had two organs involved, with gastro-intestinal, respiratory, and cutaneous manifestations being the most frequent symptoms. After a median follow-up of 4.5 [2.5-12.3] years, 11 patients (19%) relapsed, among whom five were clearly related to prior mepolizumab spacing to more than four weeks between injections (Figure 1). In details, most of the patients were in CR (n=55, 93%) and/or in CHR (n=56, 95%) at last follow-up, including 38 (64%) OCS-free patients who fulfilled criteria for super response. No baseline predictive factor for super response was evidenced. When focusing on the 21 (36%) patients with more than eight years of follow-up (median 14.4 [12.2-17.3] years), outcomes tended to be the same as those of the overall population. At last follow-up more than 70% of patients were able to space mepolizumab's infusions for more than four weeks (median time between two injections at last follow-up: 8 [4-11] months). Ultimately, four patients were able to discontinue mepolizumab without subsequent relapse with more than two years of follow-up. There was no new safety signal, and no patient withdrew mepolizumab due to a treatment-related adverse event. Conclusion Mepolizumab remains highly efficacious in the long-term (including in patients with more than 10 years of follow-up), enabling sustained disease remission despite tapering of OCS and spacing of injections. Very few cases of mepolizumab failure were identified, among which the leading cause was HES misdiagnosis.

Efficacy and Safety of Biologics for Oral Corticosteroid–Dependent Asthma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

A maintenance oral corticosteroid (OCS) in addition to high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting β2-agonists in patients with severe asthma leads to long-term adverse events. Oral corticosteroid-sparing agents are of high priority. This network meta-analysis assessed biologics' comparative efficacy and safety in OCS-dependent patients with asthma. We performed a systematic search through PubMed, Scopus, Embase, the Cochrane Center of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar for randomized controlled trials that addressed the efficacy and safety of biologics compared with placebo in OCS-dependent patients with asthma from inception to July 2023. The primary outcome was an overall reduction in the OCS dose while asthma control was maintained. We included seven randomized controlled trials involving 1,052 OCS-dependent patients with asthma. Compared with placebo, benralizumab every 8 weeks, benralizumab every 4 weeks, dupilumab, and mepolizumab were efficacious in achieving a reduction in the OCS dose with low to moderate confidence (odds ratio [95% CI]: 4.12 [2.22-7.64]; 4.09 [2.22-7.55]; 3.25 [1.90-5.55]; and 2.39 [1.25-4.57], respectively) whereas tralokinumab, tezepelumab, and subcutaneous reslizumab were ineffective. An indirect comparison found no significant differences among benralizumab, dupilumab, and mepolizumab. Efficacy in reducing exacerbations was consistent with the primary analysis. High baseline blood eosinophil counts benefit from anti-IL-5 therapies, whereas high FeNO levels favor dupilumab regardless of blood eosinophil counts. Adverse events between biologics and placebo were comparable, except for eosinophilia with dupilumab. In OCS-dependent patients with asthma, benralizumab, dupilumab, and mepolizumab were superior to placebo in reducing the OCS dose. Evaluating baseline biomarkers helps in choosing the proper biologics to maximize treatment effects.

Anifrolumab for systemic lupus erythematosus: A clinical study of Japanese patients in Kanazawa University Hospital.

We investigated the effectiveness of anifrolumab in treating systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We treated seven patients with SLE (age range, 31-68 years; median age, 48 years); one male and six females) with anifrolumab between January 2022 and February 2023 at Kanazawa University Hospital. The period between the onset and initiation of anifrolumab treatment was 60-276 months (median, 234 months), and the SLE disease activity index-2000 (SLEDAI-2 K) before treatment was 2-6 months (median, 3 months). Five patients experienced skin rashes or alopecia, and their cutaneous lupus erythematosus disease area and severity index (CLASI) activity scores were 2-9 (median, 4). Six patients continued treatment with anifrolumab, but one did not because of uncontrolled pleurisy and pericarditis. Our results demonstrated that anifrolumab was effective in treating SLE and reducing both SLEDAI-2 K and CLASI activity scores (median decrease, 100%). Furthermore, the oral corticosteroid dosage could be reduced in all patients who were able to continue treatment. Our findings indicate that anifrolumab is effective not only for reducing disease and eruption activities, but also facilitates tapering of corticosteroid dosage.

Benralizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma in real life: confirmed effectiveness and contrasted effect on sputum eosinophilia versus exhaled nitric oxide fraction - PROMISE.

Randomised controlled trials have shown that benralizumab, an anti-interleukin-5 receptor monoclonal antibody, reduces exacerbations and oral corticosteroid dose and improves asthma control and lung function in severe eosinophilic asthma. The aim of this study was to confirm results of randomised controlled trials in real life in a population of 73 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma treated with benralizumab for at least 12 months. Patients underwent careful monitoring of asthma exacerbations, exhaled nitric oxide fraction, lung function, asthma control and quality of life questionnaire responses and sputum induction, and gave a blood sample at baseline, after 6 months and then every year. We found significant reductions in exacerbations (by 92%, p<0.0001) and oral corticosteroid dose (by 83%, p<0.001) after 6 months that were maintained over time, with 78% of patients able to stop oral corticosteroid therapy. Patients improved their Asthma Control Test (ACT) score (from 11.7±5.1 to 16.9±5.35, p<0.0001), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score (from 2.88±1.26 to 1.77±1.32, p<0.0001) and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score (+1.04, p<0.0001) at 6 months and this was maintained during follow-up. Only 35% and 43% of patients reached asthma control according to an ACT score ≥20 and ACQ score <1.5, respectively. We observed stable post-bronchodilation lung function over time and a significant reduction in sputum eosinophil count, with 85% of patients exhibiting sputum eosinophil counts <3% after 6 months (p<0.01) with no effect on exhaled nitric oxide fraction. In our real-life study, we confirm the results published in randomised controlled trials showing a sharp reduction in exacerbations and oral corticosteroid therapy, an improvement in asthma control and quality of life, and a dramatic reduction in sputum eosinophil count.

Trends inprevalence, treatment use, anddisease burden inpatients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis inJapan: Real-world database analysis.

We report the prevalence of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) and describe oral corticosteroid (OCS) use and disease burden before and after the mepolizumab approval in 2018 for EGPA in Japan. Two retrospective studies (GSK IDs: 218083 and 218084) used two databases: (1) the JMDC insurer database (Japanese health insurer claims) was used to report annual EGPA prevalence and OCS use in mepolizumab-treated patients and (2) Medical Data Vision database was used to report annual treatment use, OCS dose, relapses, and healthcare resource utilization in patients with EGPA. EGPA prevalence (95% confidence interval) increased from 4.2 (0.1, 23.4) in 2005 to 58.6 (53.2, 64.5) per 1,000,000 in 2020. Median OCS dose (mg/day) decreased from a range of 4.8-7.7 during 2010-2017 to 4.5-4.8 during 2018-2020 (lowest dose in 2020). The proportion of patients with prednisolone-equivalent daily OCS dose >10 mg decreased from 2017 (11.9%) to 2020 (10.3%), while the median dose halved. The proportion of patients with EGPA relapses (64.3% to 41.6%) and hospitalization (27.8% to 23.6%) decreased from 2010 to 2020. EGPA prevalence increased between 2005 and 2020. With the introduction of mepolizumab for EGPA in 2018, real-world OCS use, relapses, and healthcare resource utilization decreased.

Anti-IL-5 dans l’asthme sévère associé à une granulomatose éosinophilique avec polyangéite. Étude en vie réelle

Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is a form of necrotizing vasculitis affecting small vessels and typically characterized by severe glucocorticoid (GC)-dependent eosinophilic asthma. While mepolizumab, which is indicated at a dose of 100mg/4weeks in severe eosinophilic asthma, has been shown to be an effective treatment for EGPA-related asthma at a dose of 300mg/4weeks, it was only recently approved at this dose. This retrospective, single-center, observational study was conducted to investigate over a 5-year period (2014-2019) the effect of mepolizumab 100mg/4weeks at 12months in patients with EGPA and glucocorticoid-dependant severe asthma. Response to treatment was defined as reduction in daily dose of oral corticosteroids to at most 5mg/day or reduction in annual exacerbation by at least 50%. Thirty patients were included, of whom twenty-three were treated (two were not fully evaluable). Among the 21 evaluable treated patients, 13 (62%) had responded at 12months. At baseline, non-responders had lower FEV1 levels and lower blood eosinophil levels than responders. Mepolizumab at a "severe asthma" dose (100mg/4weeks) is effective in treatment of GC-dependent severe asthma in most patients with EGPA.

Factors Affecting the Ability to Discontinue Oral Corticosteroid Use in Patients with EGPA Treated with Anti-Interleukin-5 Therapy

Introduction: Patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) and some with severe eosinophilic asthma require continuous long-term oral corticosteroid (OCS) treatment for disease control. The anti-interleukin-5 agent, mepolizumab, has recently become available for the treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma and EGPA, with promising results and safety profiles. The proportion of patients with EGPA who discontinued oral steroids was 18% in the MIRRA trial. To compare patients with EGPA who were able to discontinue steroids with mepolizumab with those who could not. Methods: Twenty patients with EGPA treated with mepolizumab were evaluated at Osaka Habikino Medical Center. The OCS dose, asthma control test score, fractional exhaled nitric oxide levels, peripheral eosinophil count, and spirometric parameters were evaluated before and after treatment. Results: There was a significant reduction in the mean OCS dose from a prednisolone equivalent of 8.88 ± 4.99 mg/day to 3.18 ± 3.47 mg/day (p < 0.001). In this study, 40% of patients discontinued oral steroids. The most common reason for the failure to discontinue steroids in patients was poor asthma control. The percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s significantly improved in patients with EGPA who could discontinue steroids after receiving mepolizumab. Conclusion: In this real-world study, treatment with mepolizumab for EGPA was associated with a significant reduction in OCS use; however, poor asthma control was identified as an inhibiting factor for steroid reduction.