Oral Anticoagulants Research Articles

10-Year Trends of Antithrombotic Therapy Status and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Renal Dysfunction - The Fushimi AF Registry.

Anticoagulation therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF) has undergone major changes following the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in 2011. However, the transition of anticoagulation therapy for AF patients with severe renal dysfunction remains to be elucidated. Follow-up data, including creatinine clearance (CrCl), were available for 3,706 patients in the Fushimi AF Registry. We divided patients into 3 groups based on CrCl as follows: (1) CrCl ≥50 mL/min; (2) 50 mL/min>CrCl≥30 mL/min; and (3) CrCl <30 mL/min. In patients with CrCl ≥50 mL/min and 50>CrCl≥30 mL/min, prescription of oral anticoagulants increased year-by-year from 2011 to 2021 with a growing proportion of DOAC; however, the prescription of oral anticoagulants remained almost unchanged in those with CrCl <30 mL/min. In patients with CrCl ≥50 mL/min and 50 mL/min>CrCl≥30 mL/min, the incidence of adverse events, including stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding, was lower among patients enrolled after 2014 than before 2013. However, these trends were not seen in patients with CrCl <30 mL/min. Despite the increased use of DOAC in patients with AF since 2011, anticoagulation therapy for AF patients with severe renal dysfunction has largely remained unchanged, and a reduction in adverse events in those patients has not been observed.

Clinical practices and treatment preferences in chronic coronary syndrome management among Indian physicians

Introduction: Chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) is a significant contributor to morbidity and mortality worldwide, particularly in India, where risk factors such as hypertension and diabetes are increasingly prevalent. Effective management of CCS typically involves lifestyle modifications, pharmacotherapy, and sometimes interventional procedures. Methods: A digital questionnaire-based survey was conducted across multiple sites in India, involving cardiologists and consultant physicians. The survey comprised nine questions addressing the prevalence of CCS, preferred treatments, and factors influencing prescribing decisions for novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs). Results: A total of 66 physicians were enrolled. Approximately 40.30% of physicians reported that more than 40% of their patients had CCS. The majority of physicians (57.81%) reported that dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was most preferred treatment for CCS. Around 51% of physicians reported bleeding risk as the primary hindrance in prescribing rivaroxaban and aspirin for CCS patients. The majority of physicians (42.19%) preferred rivaroxaban with a prescription rate of 40%. Apixaban was most commonly prescribed at a rate of 30% by 33.87% of physicians, while dabigatran was typically prescribed at rates of 10% and 20% (41.82% each). Warfarin was prescribed for 10% of patients by 51.79% of respondents. In non-valvular atrial fibrillation cases, 73.13% preferred rivaroxaban primarily for its once-daily dosing advantage. Conclusion: The present study reveals current trends in the management of CCS and the utilization of NOACs among physicians in India. It underscores the growing significance of NOACs, particularly rivaroxaban, in enhancing treatment outcomes for patients with CCS.

Can the Charlson comorbidity index help to guide DOAC dosing in patients with atrial fibrillation and improve the efficacy and safety of treatment? A subanalysis of the MAS study

BackgroundFrailty influences the effectiveness and safety of anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The age-weighted Charlson comorbidity index may offer a valuable tool to assess the risk of adverse events in AF patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). This sub-analysis of MAS trial data aimed to assess whether using the Charlson index, instead of the standard criteria, would have led to different dosing and improved adverse event occurrence during treatment. MethodsThe MAS study looked for a relationship between DOAC levels assessed at baseline and adverse events during follow-up. The study is described in detail elsewhere. ResultsAmong the 1,657 patients studied, 832 (50.2 %) had a relatively low Charlson index (up to 6, general median class), of whom 132 (15.9 %) were treated with reduced doses. Conversely, among the 825 patients with a high Charlson index (≥7), 257 (31.1 %) received standard doses. A weak but statistically significant positive correlation (r = 0.1413, p < 0.0001 by ANOVA) was observed between increasing Charlson classes and DOAC levels standardized to allow comparability among drug results. However, no significant differences were found in the incidence or number of adverse events during follow-up, or in other parameters, between patients with low and high Charlson's scores. ConclusionsUtilizing the Charlson index would have led to notable differences in DOAC dosing compared to standard criteria. However, we found no evidence that its use would have improved the prediction of adverse events in AF patients enrolled in the MAS study.

Use of Direct Anticoagulants in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Review of the Current Evidence and Emerging Perspectives.

Thromboembolic events and atrial fibrillation are common among kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), and these conditions typically require anticoagulation. Traditionally, vitamin K antagonists were used for management, but the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has increased in KTRs. In the general population, DOACs are recommended over warfarin, but the applicability of these recommendations to KTRs is unclear because of risk-benefit concerns. There is some hesitancy to use DOACs in KTRs because of their dependence on renal clearance for elimination, potential drug-drug interactions, and limited data. To date, studies of DOACs in KTRs have demonstrated that they are efficient in thromboembolic events, major bleeding is rare, and drug-drug interactions appear rare. However, no guidance yet exists about the use of DOACs, reversal of DOAC action, and the pre- and post-kidney transplant management of DOACs in KTRs, and the evidence base is scarce. Thus, decisions on DOAC use in KTRs are based on expert opinion and the resources and experiences of individual transplant centers. This review summarizes 10 published studies on the use of DOACs in 741 KTRs, evaluating the side effects, efficacy, drug-drug interactions, and perioperative management compared with those of 1320 KTRs using vitamin K antagonists. Although current data are limited, DOACs appear to be relatively safe and effective in KTRs, with some studies suggesting lower bleeding rates and better kidney function than with vitamin K antagonists. However, more research with larger patient groups is needed to draw definitive conclusions.

Atrial fibrillation and multimorbidity: How to choose the perfect direct oral anticoagulant?

Atrial fibrillation is one of the most common tachyarrhythmias, the prevalence of which is steadily increasing due to an increase in the proportion of the elderly population. The presence of a comorbidities in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation, increasing the risk of thromboembolic events, has a significant impact on the clinical strategy of atrial fibrillation, as well as on the choice of therapeutic tactics, especially anticoagulant therapy with proven efficacy and low risk of bleeding. One of the most common concomitant diseases in patients with atrial fibrillation are chronic kidney disease, anemia and coronary artery disease. These comorbidities in patients with atrial fibrillation not only increase the risk of stroke and/or systemic embolism, but are also accompanied by an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality, all causes mortality, and hemorrhagic events. At the same time, according to research data, about half of polymorbid patients with atrial fibrillation do not receive anticoagulant therapy, which indicates a low awareness of physicians about rational pharmacotherapy based on clinical recommendations for this cohort of patients. The drug of choice with the most studied safety profile and a high degree of efficacy in these patients is apixaban from the group of direct oral anticoagulants. Unlike vitamin K antagonists and other representatives of direct oral anticoagulants, apixaban, according to the conducted studies, is associated with a more significant reduction in the risk of thromboembolic events, and most importantly, has a lesser effect on the risks of bleeding in patients, predisposing to hemorrhagic complications, with atrial fibrillationand concomitant coronary artery disease, anemia, chronic kidney disease.

Four-factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate Use for Bleeding Management in Adult Trauma.

The clinical use of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate in adult trauma patients at risk of bleeding is supported by evidence for urgent reversal of oral anticoagulants but is controversial in acquired traumatic coagulopathy.

Oral Anticoagulation in Device Patients With Atrial High-Rate Episodes: Shared Decision-Making After ARTESIA and NOAH-AFNET-6.

Oral Anticoagulation in Device Patients With Atrial High-Rate Episodes: Shared Decision-Making After ARTESIA and NOAH-AFNET-6.

Comparing the Effect of DOAC-Stop® and DOAC-Remove® on Apixaban, Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran Prior to Thrombophilia and Lupus Testing.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) interfere with coagulation assays potentially leading to inaccurate results. This study determined the effectiveness of DOAC-stop® and DOAC-remove® in overcoming DOAC interference. It aimed to investigate the extent to which apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran had an effect on thrombophilia and lupus tests using normal plasma, as well as whether DOACs interfere with true-positive results by testing abnormal controls. Apixaban (0.03mg/mL), rivaroxaban (0.01mg/mL), and dabigatran (0.019mg/mL) stock solutions were made and added to the normal pool at three different concentrations (200, 400 and 600ng/mL) and to the abnormal controls at a single concentration. These samples and untreated DOAC controls were tested before and after adding either DOAC-stop® or DOAC-remove®. The measured parameters included protein C, protein S, antithrombin III (ATIII), DRVVS, DRVVC, PTT-LA and DOAC concentration. The normal pool spiked with DOAC was repeated seven times for each DOAC at each concentration level and the abnormal controls spiked with DOAC were repeated four times at a single concentration level for each DOAC. In the normal pool, dabigatran and rivaroxaban affected all lupus anticoagulant tests, whereas apixaban only affected DRVVS and DRVVC. While dabigatran led to false-positive protein S deficiency and falsely elevated ATIII. Both DOAC-stop® and DOAC-remove® brought the thrombophilia results and all falsely elevated lupus anticoagulant results back within the normal range for apixaban and rivaroxaban. For dabigatran all the affected lupus anticoagulant tests remained abnormal following DOAC-remove®, unlike DOAC-stop® treatment, where only DRVVS and DRVVC at 600ng/mL remained abnormal. In abnormal controls, all DOACs falsely elevated the lupus anticoagulant tests, whereas dabigatran caused false negative ATIII results, that were corrected (remained abnormal) with DOAC-stop® and DOAC-remove®. DOAC-stop® showed a greater reduction in lupus anticoagulant results than DOAC-remove®, causing a false-negative DRVVT ratio for rivaroxaban. DOAC-stop® is more effective than DOAC-remove® in removing all DOACs below the reference range, whereas DOAC-remove® failed to remove dabigatran.

SAFETY OF DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS IN PATIENTS WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 80 YEARS AND OLDER: CLINICAL RISK FACTORS

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) use is complicated by bleeding, especially in the geriatric population. Most studies focus on predicting major bleeding, while clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) is no less important for practice. АIM: of the study was to evaluate the ability of clinical factors to predict the risk of CRNMB while taking DOACs in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) aged 80 years and older. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 367 patients were examined with non-valvular AF aged 80 years and older (median age 84 [82; 88] years) taking DOACs. The main population parameters (gender and age composition of groups, body mass index), risk of ischemic stroke according to the CHA2DS2-VASc scale, risk of bleeding according to the HAS-BLED scale, comorbidity, Charlson comorbidity index, risk factors for chronic non-communicable diseases, number of medications taken, objective examination data, vascular wall stiffness, and laboratory test results were assessed. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, significant risk factors for developing CRNMB with all DOACs were: higher frequency of walking (p=0.022), lower heart rate (p=0.08), and history of gastric and duodenal ulcer (GDU) (odds ratio (OR) 5.34 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.31; 12], p0.001). As a result of multivariate analysis, a model for predicting CRNMB was developed, with age, type of DOAC, liver disease, acute cerebrovascular accident, history of GDU selected as predictors. The resulting model was characterized by 62.6% [95% CI: 57.4; 67.6] predictive accuracy, 66.5% [95% CI: 59.4; 73.1] sensitivity and 58.2% [95% CI: 50.4; 65.7] specificity. CONCLUSION: The study identified specific modifiable, potentially modifiable, and non-modifiable risk factors for the development of CRNMB in patients with AF over 80 years of age taking DOACs. The results of the study can be used to create an electronic system to support medical decision-making, manage risk factors, and improve the quality of life of the population.

Long-term Impacts of Long COVID: Increased Incidence of Cardiomyopathies, Joint Diseases, and Psychoanxiety Disorders.

The COVID-19 pandemic has intensified inquiries into the interplay between diabetes and disease severity, and the long-term impact of long-COVID. This study specifically explored the implications of different antithrombotic treatments on COVID-19 patients. It aimed to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in mitigating thromboembolic complications in COVID-19 patients. We conducted a study on 157 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 from August 2021 to August 2023. The study evaluated shifts in anticoagulant therapy recommendations, tracking the transition from VKA to DOACs, and analyzed associated health outcomes. A significant shift from VKA to DOACs prescriptions was observed, especially in high-risk patients. Despite the change in antithrombotic treatments, incidences of varices and varices with hemorrhoids increased by 2.6% and 3.2%, respectively. Long-COVID was also linked to higher occurrences of diabetes and gastrointestinal diseases. Joint diseases rose by 14%, indicating persistent inflammation. Cardiomyopathies increased by 3.9%, predominantly in high-risk groups, and psychoanxiety disorders surged by 39.5%, highlighting the need for further research. DOAC usage was more common in older age groups, with a 10.2% increase in recommendations among high-risk patients (p<0.05). The study underscores the evolving landscape of antithrombotic therapy in managing COVID-19 complications. Despite the increased use of DOACs, the rise in various health conditions suggests the necessity for personalized treatment strategies tailored to patient risk profiles.

Risk of death, thromboembolic events, and bleeding in elderly patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Clinical Complexity who are not taking oral anticoagulation

Abstract Background Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (AF) often exhibit Clinical Complexity (CC), defined as ≥2 features, i.e. patients aged ≥75 years plus a body mass index (BMI) &amp;lt; 23/kg/m2 and/or bleeding history and/or chronic kidney disease. No data are available about the clinical course of patients with Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and CC who are not taking oral anticoagulation (OAC). Purpose To assess the risk of thrombotic and hemorrhagic events in patients with Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and CC who are not taking OAC. Methods Retrospective study with a health care research network (TriNetX). Based on the ICD-10-CM codes entered between 2011-2022 from 85 health care organizations mainly located in the United States, AF patients ≥75 years with CC were categorized into two groups based on the use of OAC during the last year before the study period. The primary outcomes were the one-year risk of death, major cardiovascular events ([MACE]: heart failure, stroke, and myocardial infarction), and major bleeding (central nervous system, gastrointestinal, internal bleeding, and hypovolemic shock). Secondary outcomes were each component of the primary outcome and catheter ablation. Cox regression analyses were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs following propensity score matching 1:1. Results Overall, we identified 271,402 AF CC patients not on OAC (80.1±6.8 years, 46.5% females) and 87,101 AF CC patients on OAC (79.8±6.5 years, 47.6% females). Before PSM, AF CC patients not on OAC showed no significant differences in cardiovascular and bleeding risk factors but were less treated with pharmacological treatment than AF CC patients on OAC. After PSM, no significant differences were found between the two groups, but AF CC not on OAC were at higher risk of all-cause death (HR 1.54, 95%CI 1.50-1.57), MACE (HR 1.13, 95%CI 1.11-1.16), and major bleeding (HR 1.34, 95%CI 1.31-1.38), when compared to AF CC on OAC. AF CC patients not on OAC were associated with a higher risk of each component of the primary outcome and with a lower use of catheter ablation procedures (HR 0.48, 95%CI 0.43-0.54) (Table 1). The risk of the composite outcomes was the highest in those with all the three CC components. A progressive increase in OAC prescription was observed during the follow-up period, with increasing of NOACs and lower use of warfarin being observed. There was a clear temporal relationship between increasing OAC prescription and incidence of bleeding in CC patients (Figure 1) Conclusions AF CC patients not on OAC have a high risk of all-cause death, thrombotic and hemorrhagic events. Over time, increasing NOAC use was associated with more bleeding in CC patients. New antithrombotic approaches aimed at reducing thrombotic risk without increasing bleeding risk are needed in these patients.Figure 1 OAC new prescriptions

Cluster-specific risk factors for suboptimal thromboprophylaxis in contemporary European cohort of patients with atrial fibrillation: the EHRA-PATHS Project

Abstract Background Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is essential to optimal thromboprophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Owing to bleeding risk concerns, OAC use may be challenging in clinically complex high-risk AF patients. Comorbidities might lead to suboptimal OAC use. We assessed cluster-specific risk factors for non-prescribing OAC in pre-defined AF clusters in contemporary European EHRA-PATHS AF cohort. Methods The EHRA-PATHS AF cohort was constructed using data from the three prospective EurObservational Research Programme (EORP) AF registries - General Pilot, General Long-term, and AF III registry. A two-step cluster analysis was performed. A hierarchical cluster analysis with 18 variables was used to identify the optimal number of clusters, followed by a K-means cluster analysis to determine variable cluster association. Cluster-specific risk factors for non-prescribing OAC were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results Of 18.799 patients, 2086 (11.1%) were not prescribed with OAC. Among the three clusters (see Table), OAC non-prescribing was significantly more prevalent in Cluster 1 (younger healthier AF patients) compared with Cluster 2 (Elderly with less comorbidity, mostly non-cardiovascular) or Cluster 3 (Elderly with more comorbidity, mostly cardiovascular), both P&amp;lt;0.001, with no significant difference between Clusters 2 and 3 (P=0.161). Cluster-specific multivariable risk factors for non-prescribing OAC are shown in Table. In all three clusters AF clinical type was significantly associated with OAC non-use. In Cluster 1, OAC non-use was less likely in the presence of CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk factors, while bleeding risk factors were predominant multivariable predictors of OAC non-use among elderly (Clusters 2 and 3). Conclusion Our findings in a large contemporary European cohort suggest that different considerations prevail in treatment decision on OAC use in AF patients in clinical practice, depending on patient’s age and AF clinical type, as well as the presence and type of underlying comorbidities. Our findings could help in formulating targeted interventions to optimize stroke prevention in different subgroups of AF patients.

Oral anticoagulants or antiplatelets for cryptogenic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Cryptogenic strokes comprise 20 to 30% of ischemic strokes and include a substantial proportion classified as embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS). However, the optimal antithrombotic strategy for cryptogenic stroke remains contentious. Purpose We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulants (OAC) versus antiplatelets in patients with cryptogenic stroke. Methods Six electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to Feb 15, 2024 to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing stroke recurrence and major bleeding rates between OAC and antiplatelets in cryptogenic stroke patients. We included trials adhering to a stringent diagnostic work-up for cryptogenic stroke, defined as cerebral infarction not attributed to definite sources of cardioembolism, large artery atherosclerosis, or small artery disease despite undergoing comprehensive investigations. The primary outcome was recurrent ischemic stroke, and the secondary outcome was major bleeding based on International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis criteria. Subgroup analysis was conducted for ESUS patients with an increased risk of cardiac emboli, such as patent foramen ovale (PFO) and atrial cardiopathy, defined as lead V1 terminal P-wave &amp;gt; 5000 μV × ms in electrocardiogram, serum N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide level &amp;gt; 250 pg/mL, and left atrial diameter (LAE) &amp;gt; 4 cm, or LAE index ≥ 3 cm/m2 on echocardiogram. Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence (CI) was used as a measure of the effect estimates for aforementioned outcomes. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed using a restricted maximum likelihood model given between-study variance is inevitable. Results Our meta-analysis included 9 RCTs with a total of 15,139 patients (OAC = 7,343; antiplatelets = 7,796). ARCADIA, RE-SPECT ESUS, and NAVIGATE ESUS Trial investigated apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban, respectively, while warfarin was primarily used as OAC in the remaining six trials. Aspirin was predominantly utilized for antiplatelet therapy. There was no significant difference in recurrent ischemic stroke between OAC and antiplatelets (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.04; I2 = 0%). However, OAC use was associated with a significantly higher risk of major bleeding (HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.07 to 2.56; I2 = 36%). Subgroup analysis in ESUS patients revealed comparable rates of recurrent ischemic stroke in those with atrial cardiopathy (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.29; I2 = 0%) and PFO (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.49 to 1.07; I2 = 0%). Conclusions Our meta-analysis suggests that OAC use does not decrease the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke compared with antiplatelet use but is associated with a significantly higher risk of major bleeding in patients with cryptogenic stroke.Primary (A) and secondary (B) outcomesSubgroup analysis for recurrent stroke

Cost differences between oral anticoagulation therapies in atrial fibrillation patients

Abstract Background Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have largely replaced warfarin as the primary choice of oral anticoagulation (OAC) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. This study uses a nationwide registry data set to compare the health and social care costs of AF patients using different OAC therapies. We studied how these costs were distributed among different care services in the year following AF onset and how the costs develop in time before and after AF diagnosis. Methods This study is a part of the Finnish AntiCoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation (FinACAF) research project, which includes data on patients with AF, combining registry data on primary and secondary care services as well as social services, drug purchases and laboratory data. We included all new-onset AF patients from 2011 to 2017 in Finland with an indication for OAC treatment. Patients were divided based on their first OAC purchase. Time in therapeutic range (TTR) values were assessed for warfarin patients, and they were divided into quartiles based on their TTR value. Standardized costs were determined for different health and social care contacts, accounting for hospital care, primary and ambulatory care, and long-term care. Drug costs were acquired from the Reimbursement for Prescription Medicines registry. Results A total of 130,745 patients (66,610 on warfarin, 32,996 on DOACs) were included. First-year total costs after onset of AF were €10,412 for rivaroxaban (n=13,320), €12,631 for apixaban (n=11,886), €10,706 for dabigatran (n=7,514) and €10,689 for edoxaban (n=366). Costs of care clustered near the diagnosis of AF (Figure 1). Costs for warfarin patients increased inversely with TTR, ranging from €10,945 in the highest TTR quartile (TTR over 82%) to €21,387 in the lowest (TTR under 57%). Average first-year costs for warfarin patients were €15,689, higher than DOAC patients by €3,058-€5,277 (Figure 2). Patients without any OAC had the highest first-year costs, €17,898. Patients with high risk of stroke had higher total costs both in patients using DOACS (€7,271 for patients with a CHA2DS2VA score of 1 vs €11,947 for patients with CHA2DS2VA 2+) and warfarin (€9,933 for CHA2DS2VA 1 vs €16,354 for CHA2DS2VA 2+). Drug costs averaged €1,541 for rivaroxaban, €1,659 for apixaban, €1,495 for dabigatran and €1,540 for edoxaban, and €986 warfarin users. Hospital care was the largest cost driver with 64% of total costs across the whole cohort, followed by primary care (19%), drug purchases (7%), social service costs (6%) and reimbursements for travel and private care (4%). Conclusions DOACs were superior to warfarin in a broad range of social and healthcare cost measures despite higher drug expenses. Patients on warfarin with low TTR and patients without any OAC had the highest cost of care.

Frailty and anticoagulant prescription in older hospitalized patients with atrial fibrillation: a multi-centred observational study

Abstract Background Evidence of the impact of frailty on anticoagulant prescription in older people with atrial fibrillation (AF) is conflicting. Some studies suggested that oral anticoagulants (OACs) were underutilized in older people with frailty while others have not found this. Aims The primary aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of frailty in hospitalized older patients with AF and the association between frailty and OAC prescription during admission. The secondary aim was to examine the association between frailty and prescription of rate/rhythm control medications during admission. Methods This is a retrospective observational cohort study. Adults aged ≥65 years with AF admitted to six hospitals in Australia between 1 June 2022 and 31 August 2022 were eligible for this study. Frailty was defined by a Frailty Index constructed using information from the electronic medical records. Logistic regression models were applied to examine the association between frailty and the prescriptions of OACs, rate control drugs and rhythm control drugs during admission. Results are presented as odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Results A total of 685 patients were included in this analysis. They had a mean age of 82.6, and 49.8% were female. Using the cut-off point of 0.25, 42.8% of the patients were identified as being frail. Overall, 75.6% of the patients were prescribed OACs (67.9% in the frail compared to 81.4% in the non-frail, p&amp;lt;0.001), 37.7% received rate control drugs (42.0% in the frail versus 34.4% in the non-frail, p=0.044), while 27.3% received rhythm control drugs (22.9% in the frail compared to 30.6% in the non-frail, p=0.024). The adjusted odds ratios of frailty on prescriptions during admission were 0.53 (95%CI 0.37 – 0.78) for OACs, 1.45 (95%CI 1.05 – 1.99) for rate control drugs, and 0.79 (95%CI 0.55 – 1.13) for rhythm control drugs. Conclusion Our study found a high prevalence of frailty in older inpatients with AF and frailty was associated with a reduced likelihood of receiving OACs. Further studies are needed to understand the reasons for under-coagulation in frail patients with AF.Prescriptions of OACs during admission

Antithrombotic strategies after cryptogenic stroke: a systematic review, pairwise, and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract Background No definite etiology is identified in 30-40% of ischemic stroke cases, which is known as cryptogenic stroke. Several antithrombotic strategies have been investigated for cryptogenic stroke management; however, the optimal strategy remains unknown. Purpose We aim to assess the efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulants (OACs) versus aspirin, and the comparative efficacy and safety of different OACs after cryptogenic stroke. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) obtained from PubMed, Embase Cochrane, Scopus, and WOS until February 2024. We used the fixed-effects model to report dichotomous outcomes using a risk ratio (RR), with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Analysis was conducted using R, version 4.2.0. Results Seven RCTs with 15.240 patients were included. In pairwise analysis, there was no difference between OACs and aspirin regarding all-cause mortality (RR: 1.13, CI [0.89, 1.43], P= 0.33) and stroke recurrence (RR: 0.93, CI [0.82, 1.07], P= 0.31). However, OACs were associated with a significantly increased incidence of major bleeding (RR: 1.6, CI [1.24, 2.05], P= 0.01), with no difference regarding the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage (RR: 1.09, CI [0.3, 3.97], P= 0.9). Moreover, in network analysis, none of the OACs showed a significant efficacy in preventing all-cause mortality and stroke recurrence compared to aspirin. However, only rivaroxaban significantly increased the incidence of major bleeding (RR: 2.69, CI [1.67, 4.33]). Conclusion OACs did not protect against stroke recurrence or decrease the incidence of all-cause mortality but increased the incidence of major bleeding in patients with cryptogenic stroke.

Association between preprocedural thromboembolic or bleeding events under oral anticoagulation therapy and mid-term outcomes after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure

Abstract Background Currently, no consensus has been established on the most effective antithrombotic therapy to prevent thromboembolic and bleeding events in patients undergoing percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). Methods We retrospectively investigated the incidence of device-related thrombosis (DRT), thromboembolic events, and bleeding events in patients who underwent LAAC from September 2019 to October 2022. After categorizing patients into groups based on preprocedural thromboembolic or bleeding events under oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy, we compared the incidence of DRT and prognosis according to the postprocedural antithrombotic therapy. Results In patients who received the conventional antithrombotic therapy (OAC with and without single antiplatelet therapy for 45 days after LAAC and dual-antiplatelet therapy from 45 days to 6 months followed by single antiplatelet therapy), preprocedural thromboembolic events despite OAC were independently associated with DRT or postprocedural thromboembolic events at the 3-year follow-up (hazard ratio [HR] 4.55; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.32–15.6; P = 0.016), whereas preprocedural bleeding events were independently associated with postprocedural bleeding events (HR 8.01, 95% CI 1.45–58.3; P = 0.036). Continuation of OAC for 12 months among patients who developed preprocedural thromboembolic events during OAC significantly decreased the incidence of DRT or postoperative thromboembolic events (P = 0.002) with no increase in the bleeding events (P = 0.522). Conclusions Preprocedural thromboembolic and bleeding events can predict adverse events after LAAC with conventional antiplatelet-based antithrombotic therapy. Patients who develop thromboembolic events under continuous OAC may benefit from continuous OAC for 1 year after LAAC.

The effect of oral anticoagulants on the incidence of dementia in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia, with dementia being an increasingly recognised complication of this. Treatment with oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy may be protective in developing this complication. Purpose This meta-analysis aims to investigate the validity of this hypothesis, whilst additionally exploring the effect of specific OAC medication subtypes on the incidence of dementia. Methods A comprehensive search of MEDLINE and Embase for relevant studies reporting the efficacy of OAC therapy for the incidence of dementia in patients with AF was conducted from its inception until March 2023. This included observational studies that reported odds ratio, risk ratio and hazard ratio for adult AF patients. Studies including patients with prior OAC use or prior history of dementia were excluded. Statistical analysis was performed using a random-effects model to calculate the pooled hazard ratio and their corresponding 95% confidence interval for all outcomes. Subgroup analyses were also performed according to the study design, presence of observational window, and prior history of stroke in patients. Results A total of 13 studies were included in the study. Although the heterogeneity was high in all comparisons, we demonstrated that OAC usage lowered the risk of developing dementia in AF patients when compared to the non-OAC cohort. Looking more specifically at medication subtypes, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K agonists (VKA) were both effective in reducing the likelihood of AF patients developing dementia when compared to non-OAC treatments. Conclusion Our meta-analysis confirms that administration of OAC and its subtypes (VKA and DOAC) are effective pharmacotherapies in managing dementia in patients with AF. These findings have important clinical implications for the management of AF patients and highlight the need for further investigation of the protective effects of OAC therapy on cognitive decline. Future research should explore the long-term effects of OAC therapy on cognitive function in AF patients.

Temporal trends in initiation of oral anticoagulants and stroke-free survival among elderly and very elderly patients with new onset atrial fibrillation - a 20-year perspective.

Abstract Background Oral anticoagulants (OACs) significantly reduce the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, evidence regarding efficacy of OACs are lacking in the very elderly patients. Aim To examine temporal trends in initiation of OACs and five-year stroke-free survival in the very elderly patients with new onset AF over a time span of 20 years. Methods From the Danish nationwide registries, we identified patients ≥ 65 years of age with new onset AF from 1999 to 2018. The index date was defined as the day of AF diagnosis for outpatients and as the day of discharge for inpatients. Patients with a prescription of OAC, history of bleeding events, or history of stroke/transient ischemic attack prior to index were excluded. Patients were divided into two age groups based on their age at index: 1) 65-84 years (elderly); and 2) ≥ 85 years (very elderly). Patients were further divided into four calendar year groups from 1999-2018, based on the year of inclusion. We investigated the initiation of OACs and calculated the absolute five-year probability of stroke-free survival in both age groups. Results We included 167,122 patients with new-onset AF between January 1st, 1999, and December 31st, 2018. Among the patients, 23.1 % were aged 85 years or older, 48 % were male and 80.5 % had a CHA2DS2-VASc score equivalent to 2 or higher for men and 3 or higher for women. Initiation of OACs increased in both age groups after the guideline implementation of DOACs in 2010 (Figure 1). In the elderly age group, the proportion of patients receiving OACs increased from 50% in 2010 to almost 90% in 2018. In the very elderly age group, the proportion increased from 25% in 2010 to almost 90% in 2018. The probability of the five-year stroke-free survival improved by approximately 15% from 1999 to 2018 in the elderly age group, with no significant changes in the very elderly age group. Conclusion The proportion of elderly AF patients receiving OAC has increased markedly in the last 20 years. Even so, stroke-free survival remains the same among the very elderly patients.Five-year stroke-free survival

Evaluation of the biomarker-based ABC-AF-bleeding risk score and clinically based bleeding scores in 31,605 patients with atrial fibrillation treated with oral anticoagulation

Abstract Background International guidelines recommend a systematic evaluation of bleeding risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) to guide oral anticoagulation. However, it remains challenging to accurately predict bleeding risk. The biomarker-based ABC-AF-bleeding risk score to predict bleeding in anticoagulated patients with AF has shown promise. Purpose To evaluate the performance of the biomarker-based ABC-AF-bleeding risk score and compare its performance with other bleeding risk scores in 31,605 patients randomized to direct oral anticoagulant or warfarin using individual patient data from three randomized clinical trials. Methods The COMBINE AF biomarker data set contains individual patient data from three pivotal randomized trials (ARISTOTLE, ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48, and RE-LY) comparing apixaban, edoxaban or dabigatran with warfarin, in patients with AF at increased risk of stroke. The ABC-AF-bleeding biomarkers were analyzed in plasma samples collected at baseline (hemoglobin, troponin T high-sensitivity, and GDF-15) using Roche Diagnostics Elecsys assays. The biomarker-based ABC-AF-bleeding risk score (Age, Biomarkers, Clinical history of prior bleeding) was calculated as previously published. The discrimination was assessed by Harrell’s c index and compared with three clinically based bleeding risk scores; HASBLED, ORBIT, and DOAC. Results During a median follow-up time of 2.0 years, a total of 1,572 ISTH major bleeding events occurred (incidence rate per 100 person-years of 2.79) including 593 gastrointestinal (1.04) and 270 intracranial (0.47) bleeding events. The biomarker-based ABC-AF-bleeding score was well calibrated for major bleeding in the total material (Figure). The c indices for major bleeding were 0.68 (95% confidence interval 0.67-0.70), for gastrointestinal bleeding 0.70 (0.68-0.72), and for intracranial bleeding 0.66 (0.63-0.69). The biomarker-based ABC-AF-bleeding risk score provided superior discrimination compared with the clinically based risk scores in the full cohort (Table). The ABC-AF-bleeding risk score also provided superior discrimination for major bleeding in clinically relevant subgroups based on age, sex, body mass index, coronary artery disease, diabetes, heart failure, kidney function, and irrespective of DOAC or VKA use. Conclusions In patients with AF treated with different types of OAC the biomarker-based ABC-AF-bleeding score provide better discrimination of the risk för major bleeding than risk scores based only on clinical factors. The results were consistent for different types of bleeding and across multiple subgroups. There was good calibration when comparing predicted vs observed rate of major bleeding. These findings support the utility of the biomarker-based ABC-AF-bleeding risk score for advancing precision medicine in patients with AF.Calibration of ABC-AF-bleeding scoreTable