Oral Anticoagulant Group Research Articles

Use of oral anticoagulants and related factors among new-onset acute ischemic stroke patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: A report from the China Atrial Fibrillation Registry Study

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the oral anticoagulant (OAC) usage among new-onset acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in China, and to explore the possible influencing factors of influent anticoagulant therapy in these patients. Methods: The NVAF patients who experienced new-onset and non-fatal AIS from August 2011 to December 2018 in the China Atrial Fibrillation Registry (China-AF), were enrolled. The follow-up ended in December 2019. Information including patients' demographic characteristics, medical history, medication usage, which were collected before and after the index stroke, were analyzed. Patients were classified into OAC group or non-OAC group according to OAC usage within 3 months post stroke. Multivariate logistic regression analysis were conducted to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) of factors which might be associated with OAC usage within 3 months post stroke. Results: A total of 957 new-onset AIS patients were enrolled, 39.4% (377/957) patients were treated with OAC within 3 months after AIS. Covering by high-reimbursement-rate insurance (OR: 1.91, 95%CI: 1.28-2.86, P=0.002), higher number of concomitant drugs (1-2 types OR: 2.10, 95%CI: 1.36-3.23, P=0.001; ≥3 types OR: 2.31, 95%CI: 1.37-3.91, P=0.002) and 3-month-peri-stroke AF recurrence (OR: 3.34, 95%CI: 2.34-4.76, P<0.001) were associated with OAC usage within 3 months post stroke, while higher HASBLED score (OR: 0.49, 95%CI: 0.40-0.60, P<0.001) and pre-stroke antiplatelet usage (OR: 0.29, 95%CI: 0.20-0.43, P<0.001) were related to no OAC usage within 3 months post stroke. Conclusions: In China, the proportion of NVAF patients who initiated OAC therapy within 3 months after new-onset AIS is as low as about 39.4%. Factors related to the OAC usage within 3 months post stroke are 3-month-peri-stroke AF recurrence, number of concomitant drugs and patients with high-reimbursement-rate insurance coverage, but higher HASBLED score and pre-stroke antiplatelet usage are related to no OAC usage within 3 months post stroke.

Effects of short-term oral anticoagulation following surgical bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement

Short-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) is recommended for patients after surgical bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (bAVR); however, the potential benefits remain controversial. This study evaluated the effects of short-term OAC following bAVR. From 2010 to 2017, total 450 patients who underwent bAVR were enrolled. The outcomes of patients who did (OAC group) and who did not receive OAC (without-OAC group) after bAVR were compared. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for potential confounders, and a 1:1 matched cohort was formed. The main outcomes were all-cause mortality and bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (BVD). A total of 175 (39%) patients received OAC after bAVR. The median follow-up period was 2.9 years, the median duration of OAC use was 4 months; 162 pairs of patients were identified after the PSM. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of 1-year embolism/ischemic stroke between the OAC and without-OAC group in PSM cohort (0.62% vs. 1.89% for embolism, p=0.623; 0 vs. 1.23% for ischemic stroke, p=0.499). The prevalence of 1-year intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) between OAC and without-OAC group was also comparable (0.62% vs. 0.62%, p=1). The OAC group had a lower all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR):0.488, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.259-0.919). There was also a trend for reduced BVD in the OAC group (aHR: 0.661, 95% CI: 0.339-1.290). Our study demonstrated that short-term OAC use after bAVR was associated with lower all-cause mortality. The prevalence of 1-year embolism/ischemic stroke/ICH were comparable despite of OAC use.

Safety and efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke treated with anticoagulants: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundEndovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is an effective therapy in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with large vessel occlusion, especially for those who are unsuitable for intravenous thrombolysis. However, the safety and efficacy of EVT in AIS patients who receiving oral anticoagulants (OACs) is unclear, especially for the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). MethodsDatabase of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched from Jan 1, 2000, through the final search date of Jun 2, 2021. Eligible studies for enrollment required outcomes reported for events of sICH, mortality, functional status, and successful reperfusion. Meta-analysis was conducted to compare the outcomes difference after EVT between AIS patients with or without OACs use. The primary safety outcome was sICH after EVT, and the primary efficacy outcome was functional status at 3 months. ResultsOne thousand nine hundred forty studies were screened for eligibility and 15 of them were included in the meta-analysis. Compared the OACs group to control arm, vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) was associated with higher risk of sICH (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.10–2.02) and mortality (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.35–2.06). Poor functional outcomes were noted both in the VKAs and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) groups (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.54–0.71 and OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.53–0.71, respectively). No differences in successful reperfusion were observed.ConclusionsComparing with DOACs, VKAs use was associated with a higher risk of sICH and mortality after EVT. Patients who did not receive OACs exhibited more favorable outcomes. The successful reperfusion did not differ between groups. However, results for mortality and functional outcomes have to be interpreted with caution since they are based on non-randomized data and unadjusted proportions.

Coagulation Response and Prothrombotic Effect of Uninterrupted Oral Anticoagulant Administration AfterCatheter Ablation for VT.

Catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) is associated with perioperative thromboembolic risk. However, the strategy for postprocedural management remains unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prothrombotic response after VT ablation in various coagulation biomarkers in patients with and without the administration of oral anticoagulation (OAC). Data from 112 patients (58 with uninterrupted OAC and 54 without) with structural heart disease who underwent endocardial VT ablation were retrospectively analyzed. We also included 41 patients who underwent ablation for premature ventricular contraction from the right ventricle and 13 patients who underwent electrophysiology study (the control group). Blood samples of coagulation markers were collected before and 3days after the procedure in all patients. The percentage of D-dimer levels≤1.0μg/mL at baseline was lower in the VT ablation groups (76% and 50% in the OAC and non-OAC groups, respectively) than in the other groups (100%). After 3days, the percentage remained at 67% in the OAC group; however, the non-OAC VT group demonstrated a remarkable decrease of 20%. Similarly, fibrin monomer complex, thrombin antithrombin, and prothrombin fragment 1+2 levels were well suppressed in the control, premature ventricular contraction, and OAC groups. However, the non-OAC group demonstrated increased coagulation markers both before and after 3days. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that OAC administration and normal coagulation markers at baseline were independent predictors of stable coagulation status after ablation. The coagulation cascade was significantly activated in patients undergoing VT ablation. Uninterrupted OAC administration suppressed the coagulation response, which might be associated with a reduction in perioperative prothrombotic risk.

Safety and efficacy of different anticoagulation regimens after left atrial appendage occlusion

This study examined the safety and efficacy of different anticoagulation regimens in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAC) using the Watchman closure device. AF patients who underwent LAAC using the Watchman closure device in the Department of Cardiology, Jiangsu Taizhou People's Hospital between March 2018 and November 2019 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into two groups according to different postoperative anticoagulant regimens. One group was treated with anticoagulant therapy alone [oral anticoagulant (OAC)/new OAC (NOAC) group] and the other was given NOACs combined with single antiplatelet therapy (SPAT) (NOAC + SAPT group). The incidences of ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), major bleeding events, all-cause mortality, and device-related thrombosis (DRT) were recorded. Furthermore, multivariate regression was used to analyze the factors associated with the occurrence of early DRT. A total of 160 patients, including 42 (51%) females, with a mean age of 69.13±6.14 years were enrolled in this study. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.66±1.11 and the mean HAS-BLED score was 4.16±0.82. During the postoperative follow-up period, there were no significant differences in the incidence of ischemic stroke/TIA [hazard ratio (HR) =0.616; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.056 to 6.818; P=0.693], major bleeding events (HR =0.520; 95% CI: 0.047 to 5.764; P=0.594) nor all-cause mortality (HR =0.579; 95% CI: 0.052 to 6.394; P=0.656) between the two groups. However, the incidence of early DRT was higher in the OAC/NOAC group compared to the NOAC + SAPT group [odds ratio (OR) =0.120; 95% CI: 0.015 to 0.984; P=0.048]. Multivariate regression confirmed that atrial blood stasis (OR =11.367; 95% CI: 1.394 to 92.687; P=0.023) and peri-device leak (OR =9.337; 95% CI: 1.623 to 53.727; P=0.012) were independent predictors of early DRT. Short-term NOAC + SAPT after LAAC did not significantly increase the incidence of major bleeding events, ischemic stroke/TIA, nor all-cause mortality compared to OAC/NOAC therapy. Not only was NOAC + SAPT therapy found to be safe and effective in short-term follow-up, but it also lowered the risk of early DRT.

Temporal Trends of Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Atrial Fibrillation: Insight From the KAMIR-NIH Registry.

Background: Triple therapy is the combination of dual antiplatelet therapy plus oral anticoagulant after stent implantation. Current guidelines recommend triple therapy for acute coronary syndrome with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to identify temporal trends of antithrombotic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and AF.Methods: Among 13,104 consecutive patients from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institute of Health (KAMIR-NIH) registry, we identified 453 patients with AF after stent implantation for AMI; these patients were then divided into those who did and did not use oral anticoagulant (OAC) [OAC group (n = 71) vs. non-OAC group (n = 382), respectively].Results: The results showed that the prevalence of AF in AMI patients was 5.4% (712/13,104). Among 453 patients, only 15.7% (71/453) were treated with OAC while dual or single antiplatelet therapy was provided for 84.7% (382/453) of patients. In patients with high stroke risk (CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2), OACs were used only in 17% (69/406). Multivariate analysis revealed that female sex [odds ratio (OR) 2.11; 95% CI: 1.17–3.79], diabetes mellitus (DM) (OR 2.37; 95% CI: 1.35–4.17), prior cerebrovascular accident (CVA) (OR 4.19; 95% CI: 2–8.75), and congestive heart failure (CHF) (OR 1.89; 95% CI: 1.09–3.3) as the significant determinants of OAC use.Conclusion: The study concluded that OAC was underused. Approximately, 15%, of AMI patients with AF undergoing PCI with stent and female gender, DM, prior CVA history, and a history of CHF or the presence of moderate to severe left ventricle systolic impairment were significant determinants of OAC use.

Antithrombotic strategy and its relationship with outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic coronary syndrome.

This study aimed to explore antithrombotic strategy and its relationship with outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) at high risk for stroke and chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) in real-world clinical practice. Patients with AF at high risk for stroke complicated with CCS from China Atrial Fibrillation Registry (CAFR) were enrolled. The patients were divided into non-antithrombotic (Non-AT) group, oral anticoagulants (OAC) group, antiplatelet therapy (APT) group (aspirin or clopidogrel), and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) group (aspirin + clopidogrel) according to their antithrombotic strategies at baseline. The patients with OAC + single antiplatelet drug (14 cases) and OAC + dual antiplatelet therapy (7 cases) were excluded for the small sample size. The primary effectiveness outcome was the composite outcome of coronary events, thromboembolism, and all-cause mortality. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding events. From 2011 to 2018, 25,512 patients were included in the CARF study, 769 patients with AF at high risk for stroke and CCS were enrolled in this study. After a follow-up of 47.4 ± 25.3months, the incidences of primary effectiveness outcome were 44.6%, 25.7%, 43.6%, and 29.1% in the four groups, respectively (P < 0.001). The incidences of primary effectiveness and all-cause mortality were both significantly lower in the OAC group than in the Non-AT group, (25.7% vs. 44.6%, HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.39-0.73, P < 0.001) and (14.6% vs. 38.5%, HR 0.36, 95%CI 0.25-0.52, P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, age (HR 1.03, 95%CI 1.01-1.05, P = 0.015), heart failure (HR 1.67, 95%CI 1.20-2.33, P = 0.002) and OAC (HR 0.66, 95%CI 0.47-0.91, P = 0.012) were independent factors for the composite outcome. There was no significant difference in major bleeding events between the four groups. OAC monotherapy significantly reduced the primary effectiveness composite outcome and all-cause mortality in the patients with AF at high risk for stroke complicated with CCS. However, there was no significant difference in major bleeding among the different antithrombotic strategies.Trial Registration www.chictr.org.cn (No. ChiCTR-OCH-13003729).

Geriatric assessment in elderly patients receiving oral anticoagulants: results of the nursing study

Abstract Background It is well known that thrombosis and bleeding risk increases with age, in the same time prevalence of geriatric syndromes increases too. It can influence negatively on efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy. However, impact of geriatric syndromes is often underestimated in clinical practice. Purpose To evaluate prevalence of geriatric syndromes in elderly patients receiving oral anticoagulants (OAC). Methods This study enrolled 510 patients (19% male) aged 75–100 (mean 82±4) years hospitalized to our clinic consecutively from June to November in 2019. Nurses examined all patients according to specially designed nursing assessment algorithm that included Mini-Cog test, Morse Fall and Norton scales, Barthel Activities of daily living Index, Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) tests, Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) scale, Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15), and some other questionnaires. Before hospitalization, 61 patients (12%) received OAC due to atrial fibrillation (AF) (83,6%), venous thromboembolism (VTE) (9,8%) and AF+VTE (6,6%). In all patients, AF frequency was 21% (n=107), but OAC were prescribed in 51% (n=55) only. Patients receiving OAC (group 1; n=61) did not differ from those without OAC (group 2; n=449) by age, sex, frequency of hypertension, previous myocardial infarction and revascularization, stable angina, and some other chronic diseases. Results Patients in group 1 had lower score on Norton scale (17,2±2,3 vs 18,1±1,8; p=0,001), Barthel Index (87,9±19,1 vs 94,4±10,7; p&amp;lt;0,001), SPPB (4,5±3,1 vs 6,0±3,3; p=0,001), walk speed (0,50±0,44 vs 0,60±0,30 m/s; p=0,014) and higher score on Morse Fall scale (47,8±20,7 vs 39,8±20,6; p=0,005) compared to patients in group 2. They had higher frequency of frailty (SPPB tests ≤7 score) (82% vs 66%; p=0,011), functional dependence (Barthel Index ≤60 score) (71% vs 44%; p&amp;lt;0,001) and pressure ulcers high risk (Norton scale ≤13 score) (6,6% vs 1,6%; p=0,012). They also had higher frequency of fall in the past year (57% vs 41%; p=0,017), high fall risk (Morse Fall scale ≥51 score) (38% vs 28%; p=0,073) and subcutaneous hematomas (25% vs 12%; p=0,009). Univariate regression analysis with age and sex adjustment showed that patients receiving OAC had higher risk of functional dependence (OR 3,05; 95% CI 1,69–5,49; p&amp;lt;0,001), frailty (OR 2,31; 95% CI 1,16–4,62; p=0,018) and pressure ulcers high risk (OR 4,24; 95% CI 1,19–15,16; p=0,026). OAC therapy was also associated with falls in the past year (OR 1,94; 95% CI 1,13–3,35; p=0,016) Conclusion Patients receiving OAC had a higher incidence of some geriatric syndromes, such as frailty, functional dependence, falls, pressure ulcers high risk, and lower functional status compared to patients without OAC. Nursing assessment of geriatric patients provides physician with additional data that allows to identify factors potentially affecting the efficacy and safety of OAC therapy. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Net clinical benefit of direct oral anticoagulants in very elderly and high bleeding risk patients with atrial fibrillation who are often excluded from oral anticoagulation therapy: a nationwide popul

Abstract Background In the Edoxaban Low-Dose for Elder Care Atrial Fibrillation Patients (ELDERCARE-AF) trial, low-dose edoxaban (15mg once daily) showed better efficacy for stroke prevention and positive net clinical benefit compared to placebo in very elderly and high bleeding risk patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who often excluded from oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy. However, there are limited data to generalize the ELDERCARE-AF results into daily practice. Purpose To investigate the optimal OAC strategy for the best net clinical benefit in ELDERCARE-AF-like patients. Methods Using the Korean nationwide claims database, we included patients with incident non-valvular AF aged 80 years or older between 2014 and 2017. Among these, patients with one or more of the following criteria were finally included in the analysis: a low creatinine clearance (15 to 30 mL/min), a history of bleeding from a critical area or organ or gastrointestinal bleeding, low body weight (≤45kg), continuous use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or current use of an antiplatelet drug. The risks of ischemic stroke, major bleeding, all-cause death, and composite clinical outcome (ischemic stroke+major bleeding+all-cause death) as a measure of net clinical outcome were evaluated during follow-up. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was used to balance covariates between the groups. Results A total of 23,858 patients were finally included (no OAC, n=16,575; warfarin, n=2390; and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), n=4893, respectively). Among DOAC group, 69% used low-dose including rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily, dabigatran 110 mg twice daily, apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily, and edoxaban 30 mg once daily and 9% used very low dose including rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily and edoxaban 15 mg once daily (Figure). Median follow-up duration was 2 years (interquartile ranges, 1 to 3 years). Baseline characteristics were well-balanced after IPTW. Compared to the no OAC group, the DOAC group was associated with a lower risk of ischemic stroke (hazard ratio [HR], 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.81, 0.68–0.95) and all-cause death (0.90, 0.85–0.95), and a higher risk of major bleeding (1.43, 1.20–1.69) (Figure). Patients treated with DOAC showed a lower risk of composite clinical outcome compared to those without OAC treatment (0.93, 0.88–0.98). Warfarin treatment did not reduce the risk of ischemic stroke (1.03, 0.85–1.23) and all-cause death (1.05, 0.99–1.12), but increased the risk of major bleeding (1.60, 1.32–1.92) and the composite clinical outcome (1.08, 1.02–1.15) compared to no OAC group. Conclusion In very elderly patients with non-valvular AF who had one or more frail components, DOACs which were currently prescribed in usual clinical practice showed better effectiveness and positive net clinical benefit compared to no OAC treatment. Compared to the latter, warfarin did not show benefit and possible harm. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Antiplatelet Effect of Single Antiplatelet Therapy With Prasugrel and Oral Anticoagulation After Stent Implantation in a Rabbit Arteriovenous Shunt Model.

Background: Antiplatelet therapy following stent implantation in patients requiring oral anticoagulation (OAC) is controversial because triple therapy (i.e., dual antiplatelet therapy [DAPT] with OAC) is associated with a high risk of bleeding.Methods and Results: In this study, 21 rabbits were divided into 5 groups: prasugrel and warfarin (Prasugrel+OAC group); aspirin and warfarin (Aspirin+OAC group); prasugrel, aspirin, and warfarin group (Triple group); prasugrel and aspirin (Conventional DAPT group); and no medication (Control group). The treated groups were administered medication for 1 week. An arteriovenous shunt loop was established from the rabbit carotid artery to the jugular vein and 2 bare metal stents were deployed in a silicone tube. After 1 h of circulation, the volume of thrombi was evaluated quantitatively by measuring the amount of protein. Bleeding time was measured at the same time. The volume of the thrombus (amount of protein) around stent struts was lowest in the Triple group, followed by the Prasugrel+OAC and Conventional DAPT groups, and was highest in the Control group. Bleeding time was the longest in the Triple group, followed by the Aspirin+OAC, Prasugrel+OAC, Conventional DAPT, and Control groups.Conclusions: This study suggests that prasugrel with OAC may be a feasible antithrombotic regimen following stent implantation in patients who require OAC therapy.

Analysis of antithrombotic therapy in elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in the Kyrgyz Republic and ways to increase treatment adherencе

Aim. To analyze anticoagulant therapy in elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and ways to increase adherence in the work of a specialized team.&#x0D; Methods. The study followed 250 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation aged 65 to 74 years (mean age 70.74.39 years). The patients were divided into three groups: the first group included 105 people, who were prescribed warfarin in a retrospective study; the second group 57 people treated with rivaroxaban, and the third group 88 people treated with warfarin. The second and third groups were prospective study groups which were supervised by a specialized team of physicians. The groups were matched on sex and age, comorbidities. Statistical data analysis and mathematical processing were performed by using the methods of descriptive and variational statistics. Most parameters reported as absolute values and percentages, while quantitative data the 25th and 75th percentiles.&#x0D; Results. All patients included in the study had a high risk of developing thromboembolic complications by their CHA2DS2-VASc score (2) and a low risk of developing hemorrhagic complications on the HAS-BLED scale (average score 1.490.04). They were prescribed anticoagulant therapy. By the end of the year follow-up from the start of anticoagulant therapy, only 9.5% of patients were treatment adherent, in the second group 43.8%, in the third group 70.5% of patients. The reason for refusing to take warfarin in the vast majority of cases was the inability to control the international normalized ratio, medical contraindications, and the high cost of the drug in prescribing rivaroxaban. The results showed that the majority of patients with atrial fibrillation (90.5%) receive inadequate antithrombotic therapy in routine outpatient clinical practice. At the same time, in a very small number of patients (9.5%) receiving warfarin, this type of therapy can be considered adequate (60% or more of the stay time in the therapeutic range of international normalized ratio of 2.0 to 3.0).&#x0D; Conclusion. Anticoagulant therapy prescription under the supervision of a specialized team contributes to a significant improvement in treatment adherence (from 43.8 to 70.5%); promising in the future is the use of drugs from the group of new oral anticoagulants that do not require routine monitoring of coagulogram.

B-PO05-154 AN UPDATED META-ANALYSIS COMPARING LEFT ATRIAL APPENDAGE CLOSURE AND ORAL ANTICOAGULATION

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) trials such as PREVAIL and PROTECT revealed non-inferiority of LAAC compared to warfarin. The recently published PRAGUE study showed that LAAC was non-inferior to direct oral anti-coagulants. Current guidelines give a IIb recommendation for LAAC in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) with increased risk of stroke and contraindication to long-term anticoagulation. We performed an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LAAC to oral anticoagulation (OAC). We performed a literature review in PubMed, SCOPUS, and Cochrane for related articles. The search yielded 83 publications, out of which three RCT’s (PREVAIL, PRAGUE and PROTECT) were included. The Mantel- Haenszel random effects model was used to calculate odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Outcomes analyzed were ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, systemic embolization, cardiovascular mortality, major bleeding and non-procedure related major bleeding. The trials included 1516 patients, of which 933 received LAAC and 583 received OAC. The rate of hemorrhagic stroke (OR = 0.21, 95% CI [0.08-0.57], P=0.002), cardiovascular mortality (OR = 0.62, 95% CI [0.39-0.98], P=0.04) and non-procedure related major bleeding (OR = 0.46, 95% CI [0.31-0.67], P<0.0001) was significantly lower in the LAAC group compared to OAC group. There was no significant difference in ischemic stroke, systemic embolization and major bleeding rates between the two groups. In patients with NVAF eligible for anti-coagulation but with high bleeding risk, LAAC is a safe and effective treatment option.

Oral Anticoagulation Discontinuation Following Catheter Ablation of Typical Atrial Flutter

Catheter ablation (CA) of typical atrial flutter (AFL) is the preferred treatment for typical AFL due to its excellent long-term success rate. However, current guidelines recommend pursuing oral anticoagulation (OAC) based on established indices of stroke regardless of the perceived success of ablation. We conducted a retrospective study of all patients who underwent typical AFL ablation at our institute from 2011 to 2017. All patients continued OAC for at least six weeks post-CA and underwent 24-hour Holter monitoring. OAC was discontinued if there was no evidence of recurrence at six weeks. In patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction or prior atrial fibrillation episodes, OAC was continued for six months with repeat Holter monitoring at six months. A total of 106 patients were included in our analysis, with a mean age of 64 ± 14 years and 78.3% of whom were male. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3 ± 1 points. OAC was discontinued by six weeks in 17% and at one year in 55.7% of patients, respectively, but was continued indefinitely in 44.3%. Over a mean follow-up period of 28.6 ± 27.3 months, there was one ischemic stroke in the OAC discontinuation group and no ischemic events in the continued OAC group. There were a total of three major bleeding events, all in the OAC group. In patients undergoing successful AFL ablation, a strategy of OAC discontinuation with close rhythm monitoring appears feasible. The benefit of continued OAC in this cohort may be outweighed by an adverse risk of bleeding. Further studies examining rhythm-guided OAC can minimize unnecessary exposure to long-term anticoagulation.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Following Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy: A Retrospective Feasibility Study at a Single Academic Medical Center

ObjectivesTo evaluate the use of direct oral anticoagulants following radical cystectomy for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. We compared the experience of those who received venous thromboembolism prophylaxis following a robot-assisted radical cystectomy with either a direct oral anticoagulant or enoxaparin. MethodsMedical records of 66 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical cystectomy between July 2017 and May 2020 at a single academic institution were reviewed retrospectively. Patients received extended prophylaxis with either a direct oral anticoagulant or enoxaparin before or following surgical discharge. Venous thromboembolic events and complications resulting in emergency department visits and readmissions were reviewed over a 90-day postoperative period. ResultsA total of 4 venous thromboembolic events within 90 days of surgery were observed. Among patients taking enoxaparin, 5% (2/37) developed a deep vein thrombosis and 3% (1/37) developed a pulmonary embolism. Among patients taking direct oral anticoagulants, 3% (1/29) developed a deep vein thrombosis. Zero patients in the enoxaparin group and 3% (1/29) of patients in the direct oral anticoagulant group experienced bleeding that required an emergency department visit. ConclusionDirect oral anticoagulants performed comparably to enoxaparin in this feasibility study following robot-assisted radical cystectomy in 66 patients. No significant differences in the number of venous thromboembolisms or bleeding complications were observed. These data encourage future studies and support the prospect of direct oral anticoagulants as a potentially suitable oral alternative to injectable low molecular weight heparins for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis following radical cystectomy.

Efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism: a meta-analysis.

ObjectiveSeveral trials had compared the efficacy and safety between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin for acute venous thromboembolism, but the results were incomplete. This updated review comprehensively assessed the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism.DesignMeta-analysis of randomised control trials. Six databases were searched from January 2000 to December 2018.SettingAdult patients had got non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants or warfarin for venous thromboembolism.ParticipantsRandomised control trials that compared the efficacy and safety between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin.Main outcome measuresThe efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants .ResultsSeven studies involving 29,879 cases were included, among which 14,943 cases were assigned to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants group and 14,936 cases to warfarin group. Meta-analysis showed that compared with warfarin, recurrent venous thromboembolism (odds ratio 0.94 [95% confidence interval 0.81 to 1.11]), death related to venous thromboembolism or fatal pulmonary embolism (odds ratio 1.00 [95% confidence interval 0.63 to 1.60]), symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis (odds ratio 0.88 [95% confidence interval 0.72 to 1.09]), symptomatic nonfatal pulmonary embolism (odds ratio 1.03 [(95% confidence interval 0.82 to 1.30]) and all deaths (odds ratio 0.92 [95% confidence interval 0.76 to 1.12]) are similar in non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants group, but major bleeding event (odds ratio 0.61 [95% confidence interval 0.50 to 0.75]) and clinically relevant non-major bleeding event (odds ratio [95% confidence interval 0.53 to 0.85]) are less in non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants group. ConclusionsFor the treatment of venous thromboembolism, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants is as effective as warfarin, and has a better safety profile than warfarin.

MO184ANTICOAGULANT THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE AND ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

Abstract Background and Aims Chronic kidney disease (CKD) significantly alters the pharmacokinetics of drugs, which in practice complicates the selection of adequate anticoagulant therapy (ACT) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and CKD. At the same time, in the vast majority of patients with AF and CKD, ACT is required to prevent life-threatening thromboembolic complications. In such an environment, maintaining a balance between the effectiveness and safety of ACTs is extremely important. Aim is evaluation of the efficacy and safety of the use of direct oral anticoagulants (OAC) in CKD stages 1-3 in combination with AF. Method The study included 93 patients (38 men and 55 women) aged 41 to 86 years with CKD stages 1-3 and AF receiving therapy with OAC (rivaroxaban) and vitamin K antagonists (warfarin). The observation period was 12 months. Results An analysis of 75 patients with CKD of various stages and AF receiving rivaroxaban was performed, the control group consisted of 18 patients taking warfarin. The average CHA2 DS2-VASc score in the OAC group was 4.1±1.8 points, in the warfarin group - 4.2±1.3 points. There were also no significant differences between the groups in terms of the average score on the HAS-BLED scale (risk of developing hemorrhagic complications): 2.3±0.94 points in the OAC group, 2.5±0.6 points in the warfarin group. Among the comorbidities in the OAC group, 93.2% of patients had arterial hypertension (AH), 24.5% had type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM); in the warfarin group, 94.3% of patients had hypertension and 16.8% had type 2 diabetes. In 23.9% of patients in the OAC group, minor bleeding was recorded. The largest number of hemorrhagic complications occurred in patients with stage 3 CKD: 18.9% of bleeding, which significantly (p&amp;lt;0.05) exceeds the number of bleeding in patients with a more pronounced decrease in renal function. In 33.3% of patients with diabetes, hemorrhagic complications were recorded, which is significantly (p&amp;lt;0.05) more than in the group of patients without diabetes - 21.4%. The greater number of hemorrhagic complications is most likely due to a more pronounced progression of the decline in renal function compared with patients without diabetes: 71.4% of patients with diabetes showed a decrease in GFR by an average of 16.6 ml/min/1.73 m2 for 12 months, which is significantly more (p&amp;lt;0.05) than in patients without diabetes (an average of 5.7 ml/min/1.73 m2). Conclusion In patients with CKD stages 1-3 with non-valvular AF, the use of OAC is most effective and safe in preventing thromboembolic complications. At the same time, the progression of CKD against the background of diabetes when taking anticoagulants occurs faster than in its absence, regardless of the specific anticoagulant. Patients with AF, DM and CKD are more likely to have hemorrhagic complications, which requires more frequent monitoring and monitoring of the functional state of the kidneys.

Role of Different Antithrombotic Regimens after Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: A Large Single Center Experience.

Background: Optimal antithrombotic therapy after left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion is still not clear. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of different antithrombotic regimens after the procedure. Methods and Results: We retrospectively analyzed data of 260 patients who underwent LAA occlusion and divided them into four groups according to therapy at discharge: dual antiplatelet therapy (group A, 71.5%); oral anticoagulants (group B, 19%); “minimal” antithrombotic therapy (single antiplatelet agent or without any antithrombotic therapy; group C, 4.5%) and other therapeutic regimens (such as a combination of antiplatelets and anticoagulants; group D, 4.5%). We analyzed baseline characteristics, procedural data, and clinical and transesophageal follow-up for each group. The incidence of adverse events was low in the whole population and had a similar distribution among groups. The majority of bleeding events was registered during the first 3 months after the procedure (34 out of 46, 70%). Ischemic events (2%), as well as silent left atrial thrombosis, were rare and not significantly higher in the population discharged with “minimal” antithrombotic therapy. Conclusion: Our experience seems to suggest that LAA occlusion was associated with a low incidence of adverse events, regardless of antithrombotic therapy. A “minimal” drug regimen may be feasible without losing efficacy on embolic prevention for patients with high bleeding risk.

Oral anticoagulation and outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction: Insights from the Hungarian Myocardial Infarction Registry.

Anticoagulation reduces the risk of stroke and embolization and is recommended in most patients with atrial fibrillation. Patients after coronary intervention and acute coronary syndromes require antiplatelet treatment. Although oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy may interfere with the outcome of patients after coronary intervention, its exact impact remains unclear. Importantly, risk-benefit relations may be considerably different after myocardial infarction. Data of patients registered from the Hungarian Myocardial Infarction Registry, a mandatory nationwide program for hospitals treating patients with myocardial infarction, were processed. Patients registered between 01.2014. and 12.2017 were included. All-cause mortality, the composite of cardiac events (MACE), and transfusion were compared between patients receiving OAC treatment and a propensity score (PS) matched control group. Subgroup analyses of different anticoagulation and antiplatelet strategies were performed with propensity weighted Cox proportional hazards' models to estimate risk during the first year after the index event. From 30681 patients 1875 cases received OAC treatment and had apparently worse prognosis. After PS-matching, however, we found no difference regarding mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.91 95% CI 0.77-1.09, P=.303), MACE (HR: 0.92 95% CI 0.78-1.09, P=.335) or transfusion (HR: 1.21, 95% CI 0.97-1.49, P=.086). In PS-adjusted analyses for the OAC group, patients who received aspirin were associated with lower mortality (HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.60-0.997, P=.048) and MACE (HR:0.73, 95% CI 0.58-0.92, P=.008) compared to those without aspirin. In patients with acute myocardial infarction, the prognosis of OAC-treated patients was comparable to the PS matched control; however, the omission of aspirin therapy was associated with unfavorable outcomes.

Missed Opportunities to Initiate Oral Anticoagulant in Atrial Fibrillation: Insights from Australian Acute Coronary Syndrome Registries

Many patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) do not receive oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy. The aims of this study were to 1) document receipt of OAC among patients with a history of AF admitted with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS); and to 2) determine whether hospital admission was associated with an improvement in prescription of OAC therapy. Using Australian data from the Cooperative National Registry of Acute Coronary Care, Guideline Adherence and Clinical Events (CONCORDANCE) and Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) registries, 1,479 patients with a history of AF presenting with an ACS were separated into two groups: aspirin monotherapy/no therapy (No OAC) or oral anticoagulant ± aspirin (OAC). Clinical characteristics and in-hospital treatments and outcomes were compared. Of 1,479 patients, 532 (36%) with a history of AF presented on OAC with the remainder receiving antiplatelet (n=580 [39%]) or no antithrombotic therapy (n=367 [25%]). Treatment with OAC prior to presentation increased during the 18 years of the study (27% to 56%, p=0.0002). Ninety-five per cent (95%) of the OAC group had a CHA2DS2-VA score >1 vs 88% of the No OAC group (p<0.001). Patients receiving OAC had a lower prevalence of bleeding risk factors than no OAC patients (p<0.001). Only 39% of this cohort was discharged on an OAC, although this increased during the observational period (26-61%, p≤0.0001). In patients presenting with an ACS with a history of AF, receipt of OAC has improved over time but remains suboptimal. There is minimal escalation in provision of OAC therapy during hospital care, indicating missed opportunities to address this evidence practice gap.

The Association of Preinfection Daily Oral Anticoagulation Use and All-Cause in Hospital Mortality From Novel Coronavirus 2019 at 21 Days: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Practices regarding anticoagulation use in coronavirus disease 2019 focus primarily on its efficacy in the critically ill without a clear understanding of when to begin anticoagulation. We sought to understand the association of preinfection daily oral anticoagulation use and the short-term mortality of patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019. Retrospective chart review. Large health system with high coronavirus disease 2019 prevalence. Patients 60 years or older admitted to the hospital with positive coronavirus disease 2019 polymerase chain reaction test. We compared both those on warfarin and those on a direct oral anticoagulant prior to admission and throughout disease course with those who were never exposed to an oral anticoagulant. Our primary outcome was inhospital mortality at 21 days from the first coronavirus disease 2019 test ordered. Patients in the direct oral anticoagulant group (n = 104) were found to have significantly lower 21-day all-cause in hospital mortality than patients in the control group (n = 894) both prior to adjustment (14.4% vs 23.8%; odds ratio, 0.57 [0.29-0.92]; p = 0.03) and after controlling for age, gender, and comorbidities (odds ratio, 0.44 [0.20-0.90]; p = 0.033). Patients on warfarin (n = 28) were found to have an elevated unadjusted mortality rate of 32% versus 23.8% in the control group (odds ratio, 1.51 [0.64-3.31]; p = 0.31). After adjustment, a reduction in mortality was observed but not found to be statistically significant (odds ratio, 0.29 [0.02-1.62]; p = 0.24). There was no statistical difference noted in the number of bleeding events in each group. In this retrospective cohort study evaluating oral anticoagulant use among patients with coronavirus disease 2019, we found that patients who are on daily oral anticoagulation at the time of infection and throughout their disease course had significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality at 21 days. Validation of these findings should be performed on population-based levels. While research regarding anticoagulation algorithms is ongoing, we believe these results support future randomized control trials to understand the efficacy and risk of the use of early oral anticoagulation.