Oral Anticoagulant Treatment Research Articles

The Influence of Frailty Syndrome and Dementia on the Convenience and Satisfaction with Oral Anticoagulation Treatment in Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

Background: The impact of frailty syndrome (FS) and dementia on the convenience and satisfaction with oral anticoagulation (OAC) treatment in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients is not well-known. Aim: Assessment the impact of FS and dementia on the convenience and satisfaction with OAC treatment in 116 elderly (mean age 75.2, SD = 8.2) patients with AF. Methodology: A self-administered questionnaire was used in the study to collect basic socio-demographic and clinical data. Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) questionnaire was used to assess the presence of FS, Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) to assess cognitive impairment (CI), The Perception of Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaire Part 2 (PACT-Q2) to assess convenience and satisfaction with OAC treatment, and the Arrhythmia-Specific Questionnaire in Tachycardia and Arrhythmia (ASTA) to assess quality of life (QoL). Results: Multivariable analysis as a significant, negative predictor of the convenience and satisfaction domain showed the occurrence of dementia (β = −0.34; p < 0.001, β = −0.41; p < 0.001, respectively) and prior major bleeding (β = −0.30; p < 0.001, β = −0.33; p < 0.001, respectively). Analysis showed a significant relationship between convenience and satisfaction and the overall result of the ASTA (r = −0.329; p < 0.001, r = −0.372; p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Elements of geriatric syndrome, such as FS and dementia, adversely affect treatment convenience and satisfaction with OAC treatment in AF. It has been shown that better convenience and satisfaction with OAC treatment translates into better QoL. There were no differences between satisfaction and convenience and the type of OAC treatment (vitamin K antagonists (VKA) vs. novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC).

Comparison of frequency of silent cerebral infarction as assessed by serum neuron specific enolase in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: Warfarin versus direct oral anticoagulant

Background Cerebral infarction in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) may clinically vary from being silent to catastrophic. Silent cerebral infarction (SCI) is the neuronal injury in the absence of clinically appearent stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Serum neuron specific enolase (NSE) is suggested to be a valid surrogate biomarker that allows to detect recent neuronal injury. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of recent SCI by positive NSE levels in patients with non-valvular AF (NVAF) on oral anticoagulants. Methods Blood samples for NSE were collected from 197 consecutive NVAF patients. NSE levels of greater than 12 ng/ml was considered as positive and suggestive of SCI. Results Patients were mainly female with a mean age of 69 years. Ninety-eight of them (49.7%) were taking warfarin. Mean INR level was 2.3 ± 0.9. Mean CHA2DS2-VASc score of the study population was 3.5 ± 1.5. Seventy-two patients (36.5%) were found to have NSE elevation. They were more likely to have history of chronic heart failure and previous stroke/TIA. Increased left atrial diameter and higher CHA2DS2-VASc were other factors associated with SCI. Patients on DOACs and patients taking aspirin on top of oral anticoagulant treatment were less likely to have SCI. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that increased left atrial diameter (OR: 2.5; 95% CI: 1.52–4; p < 0.001) and use of warfarin (OR: 2.8; 95% CI: 1.37–5.61; p = 0.005) were detected as independent predictors of SCI. Conclusions Our study revealed that DOACs were associated with significantly reduced SCIs compared with warfarin, probably due to more effective and consistent therapeutic level of anticoagulation.

Sex Differences in the Management of Oral Anticoagulation and Outcomes for Emergency Department Presentation of Incident Atrial Fibrillation

To examine sex differences in oral anticoagulation management and outcomes among patients with incident nonvalvular atrial fibrillation presenting to the emergency department (ED). We identified patients older than 20 years presenting to the ED with incident nonvalvular atrial fibrillation between April 1, 2012, and March 30, 2019, using linked administrative databases in Alberta, Canada. We assessed the use of and adherence to oral anticoagulants at 1 year using the proportion of days covered for direct oral anticoagulants and time in therapeutic range for warfarin. Outcomes included stroke, heart failure, and all-cause mortality at 1 year. Of the 28,886 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation presenting to ED, 44% were females. After adjustment, the rate of oral anticoagulant use was 5% lower in females with a guideline indication than that in males (adjusted hazard ratio 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91 to 0.99) discharged home, and there was no difference among admitted patients (adjusted hazard ratio 1.00, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.05). Females had high adherence to direct oral anticoagulants (≥80% proportion of days covered) compared to males (discharged: 77.7% versus 74.0%; admitted: 80.0% versus 76.7%; adjusted odds ratio for females: 1.15, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.29). More than half of the females and males had poor warfarin control (time in therapeutic range <65%) regardless of discharge status. In multivariable analyses, there was no sex difference in outcomes except a 1.48-fold (95% CI 1.14 to 1.92) higher risk of stroke in females. Females with incident nonvalvular atrial fibrillation discharged from the ED are less likely to receive oral anticoagulants than males. When oral anticoagulant treatment is initiated, females have high adherence to direct oral anticoagulants, and both the sexes have poor warfarin control. At 1 year, females were at a significantly higher risk of developing stroke.

Aetiology, secondary prevention strategies and outcomes of ischaemic stroke despite oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation

ObjectiveTo investigate the aetiology, subsequent preventive strategies and outcomes of stroke despite anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).MethodsWe analysed consecutive patients with AF with an index imaging-proven ischaemic stroke...

Efficacy and safety of the direct oral anti-coagulants in patients with cerebral vein thrombosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) are the standard oral anti-coagulant treatment for patients with cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). However, the direct oral anti-coagulants (DOACs) started replacing VKAs also in this setting. We aimed to evaluate safety and efficacy of the DOACs for CVT treatment. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO protocol registration number CRD42020191472). The electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL were searched from inception to January 2022. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies, enrolling at least 10 adult patients with CVT treated with any DOACs. Twenty-three studies were included, for a total of 618 CVT patients treated with DOACs (treatment duration range 3-12months). Mortality rate was 1.76% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70%-3.24%; I2 = 0%; 5/428 patients, 18 studies]; major bleeding 2.41% (95% CI 1.26%-3.91%; I2 = 1.5%; 12/534 patients, 21 studies); recurrent thrombosis 2.05% (95% CI 1.04%-3.37%; I2 = 0%; 10/577 patients, 21 studies); excellent neurological outcome 85.9% (95% CI 79.0%-91.7%; I2 = 63.7%; 289/340 patients, 13 studies); vessel recanalisation 89.0% (95% CI 82.9%-93.9%; I2 = 62.7%; 316/359 patients, 16 studies). No significant differences emerged by study design (RCTs vs. observational studies) or by treatment (DOACs vs. VKAs). This systematic review showed that the DOACs might represent a reasonable oral anti-coagulant treatment option for CVT patients.

Anticoagulant treatment and COVID-19

Objective: In this study, we aimed to examine the effect of atrial fibrillation (AF) on mortality in COVID-19 patients and the risk scores that can be used in determining risky AF patients. In addition, we aimed to examine the place of oral anticoagulant use in treatment.&#x0D; Materials and Methods: Records of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were retrospectively reviewed. Among these patients, 48 patients with a diagnosis of AF were identified. Intensive care need, mortality, CHA2DS2VASC and HAS-BLED scores of the patients were recorded. CRP and D-Dimer levels were recorded. Oral anticoagulant treatments used by the patients were recorded.&#x0D; Results: The CHA2DS2VASC (intensive care: 4,50±1,41, internal medicine service: 2,50±1,05, p

Oral Anticoagulant Treatment and the Risk of Dementia in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

BackgroundWe compared the dementia incidence rate between users and nonusers of oral anticoagulants (OACs) in a large cohort of primary care patients with atrial fibrillation.Methods and ResultsWe performed a retrospective study using an Australia‐wide primary care data set, MedicineInsight. Patients aged ≥18 years and newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2017, and with no recorded history of dementia or stroke were included and followed until December 31, 2018. We applied a propensity score for 1:1 pair matching of baseline covariates and Cox regression for comparing the dementia incidence rates for OAC users and nonusers. Data were analyzed for 18 813 patients with atrial fibrillation (aged 71.9±12.6 years, 47.1% women); 11 419 had a recorded OAC prescription for at least 80% of their follow‐up time. During the mean follow‐up time of 3.7±2.0 years, 425 patients (2.3%; 95% CI, 2.1%–2.5%) had a documented diagnosis of dementia. After propensity matching, the incidence of dementia was significantly lower in OAC users (hazard ratio [HR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.44–0.80; P<0.001) compared with nonusers. Direct‐acting oral anticoagulant users had a lower incidence of dementia than non‐OAC users (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.33–0.73; P<0.001) or warfarin users (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.28–0.74; P=0.002). No significant difference was seen between warfarin users and non‐OAC users (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.70–1.70; P=0.723).ConclusionsIn patients with atrial fibrillation, direct‐acting oral anticoagulant use may result in a lower incidence of dementia compared with treatment with either warfarin or no anticoagulant.

Ischemic Stroke of Suspected Cardioembolic Origin Despite Anticoagulation: Does Thrombus Analysis Help to Clarify Etiology?

IntroductionDespite sufficient oral anticoagulation (OAC) to prevent cardioembolism, some patients suffer from cerebral ischemic strokes of suspected cardioembolic origin. Reasons for that are not clarified yet. In certain cases, the suspected cardioembolic origin of stroke is questioned. This study aimed to understand the thrombi origin and pathophysiology in patients suffering from stroke despite OAC by the analysis of histologic thrombus composition and imaging characteristics.Materials and MethodsOn two distinct cohorts, we retrospectively analyzed histologic (n = 92) and imaging features (n = 64), i.e., thrombus perviousness in admission CT imaging, of cerebral thrombi retrieved by the endovascular treatment for a large vessel occlusion of the anterior circulation. In each group, patients with non-cardioembolic strokes and suspected cardioembolic strokes with or without anticoagulation were compared.ResultsFibrin/platelet content of suspected cardioembolic thrombi (mean/SD 57.2% ± 13) is higher than in non-cardioembolic thrombi (48.9% ± 17; p = 0.01). In suspected cardioembolic thrombi, the fibrin/platelet content does not differ in the subgroups of patients with (57.3% ± 13) and without prior OAC treatment (56.6% ±13; p = 0.8), both with higher values than non-cardioembolic thrombi. Thrombus perviousness (ε) of suspected cardioembolic OAC thrombi (mean/SD: 0.09 ± 0.06) differs significantly from non-cardioembolic thrombi (0.02 ± 0.02; p < 0.001). Further, ε is higher in suspected cardioembolic thrombi with OAC than in cardioembolic thrombi without OAC (0.06 ± 0.03; p = 0.04) and with insufficient OAC (0.04 ± 0.02; p = 0.07).ConclusionThrombi of the suspected cardioembolic origin of patients with prior OAC do not differ in their histologic composition from those without prior OAC, but both differ from non-cardioembolic thrombi. These histologic results make a non-cardioembolic etiology for strokes despite prior OAC rather unlikely but favor other reasons for these ischemic events. Perviousness assessment reinforces the histologic findings, with additional information about the OAC thrombi, which present with higher perviousness. This suggests that OAC would not affect the relative histologic thrombus composition but may alter the microstructure, as reflected by perviousness.

Growth Differentiation Factor-15 Based ABC (Age, Biomarkers, Clinical History)-AF (Atrial Fibrillation)-Bleeding Risk Score for Elderly Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.

Background Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) is a strong predictor of bleeding in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. The novel ABC (age, biomarkers, and clinical history), AF, and bleeding risk score outperforms HAS-BLED bleeding risk score for major bleeding (MB) in patients with AF receiving oral anti-coagulation in the clinical trial cohort. However, it has not been entirely externally validated. We aimed to refine and understand the application of the ABC-AF bleeding risk score in elderly (aged ≥65 years old) patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) for predicting the different types of bleeding events and anti-thrombotic treatments. Methods We identified elderly patients with NVAF between March 2018 and December 2019 who were hospitalized for the first time after a diagnosis of NVAF. We measured the plasma concentration of the ABC biomarkers (growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15) and cardiac troponin-T (cTnT)) from enrolled patients. We collected their general information and follow up for one year until December 2020. During the follow-up period, information on the occurrence of bleeding events (major bleeding, clinically relevant nonmajor gastrointestinal bleeding (CRNM GIB), and minor bleeding events) was collected. Results We enrolled 342 elderly NAVF patients; the ABC-AF bleeding and HAS-BLED scores were quantified. With an average of 1.5 years of follow-up, 6 patients had an intracranial hemorrhage; 57 patients had CRNM GIB; and 68 patients had minor bleeding events (36 fecal occult blood positive and 32 other minor bleeding events). The ABC-AF bleeding score yielded a C-index of 0.72 (95% CI 0.60–0.84) for predicting MB in elderly patients with NAVF, C-index of 0.69 (95% CI 0.57–0.82) by HAS-BLED score. Comparison of the incidence of bleeding events during follow-up and the predicted 1-year incidence of bleeding events by each bleeding risk score, ABC-AF bleeding, and HAS-BLED scores have similar value in predicting the risk for elderly patients with NAVF in different types of bleeding events, whether on oral anti-coagulation treatment (OAC) or non-OAC (P > 0.05). Conclusion In elderly patients with NVAF, the biomarker-based ABC-AF bleeding score showed similar performance compared with the HAS-BLED bleeding risk score.

The Efficacy and Safety of the Off-Label Dose of Direct Oral Anti-Coagulants Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in China

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice. Anti-coagulation therapy, especially direct oral anti-coagulants (DOACs) is an indispensable therapy for AF. Considering the increased risks of bleeding, the off-label dose of DOACs has been applied in East Asia. However, the efficacy and safety of off-label dose of DOACs is controversial. Here, we investigate its efficacy and safety in AF patients in China. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. Patients diagnosed with AF between January 2015 and December 2015 were recruited. Participants were divided into three groups according to DOACs dose: standard dose of anti-coagulation (SAG) group, off-label dose of DOACs (OFL) group and non-anti-coagulation (NCG) group. Primary endpoint event was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoint events included thromboembolic events, acute coronary syndrome, major bleeding and any rehospitalization. All endpoints were collected in 2020. Results: 296 patients were included in this study. All-cause mortality in NCG (52%) group was the highest among these three groups (p&lt;0.001), and there was no significant difference between OFL (14%) and SAG group (19%, p=0.601). Compared to SAG group (1.8%), patients in OFL group (16.2%) had higher risk of stroke and thromboembolic events (p&lt;0.001). The incidence of other events including major bleeding (p=0.597) were similar between SAG group (8.1%) and OFL group (5.4%). Conclusions: Off-label dose of DOACs shows no overall benefits in the occurrence of thromboembolic risk compared to the standard dose of DOACs in AF patients in China. Collectively, standard dose of DOACs should be advocated in China.

Effectiveness and Safety of Anticoagulation Therapy in Frail Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

Frail patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are less likely to receive anticoagulation than nonfrail patients with AF despite frailty being associated with poorer clinical outcomes including stroke. Using a population-based cohort, we sought to assess the effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulants (OACs) in frail patients with AF. This retrospective cohort study analyzed 83 635 patients aged at least 65 years with AF and frailty (≥5 Hospital Frailty Risk Score) between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2016 from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. To account for the differences between patients receiving OAC or not and across different OAC regimens, propensity score-weighting was used. Net adverse clinical event, defined as the first event of ischemic stroke, major bleeding, or cardiovascular death, was compared. In addition, each individual outcome was examined separately. In the study population (57.1% women; mean age, 78.5±7.2 years), a total of 14 968 net adverse clinical event, 3718 ischemic stroke, 5536 major bleeding, and 6188 cardiovascular death occurred. In comparison with no OAC use, OAC use was associated with lower risks of net adverse clinical event (hazard ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.75-0.82]), ischemic stroke (hazard ratio, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.86-0.97]), and cardiovascular death (hazard ratio, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.49-0.55]), but no difference was observed for major bleeding (hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.95-1.10]). Compared with warfarin, all four individual direct OAC were associated with decreased risks of net adverse clinical event, ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and cardiovascular death. The associations for OAC use (compared to no OAC use) or direct OAC use (compared to warfarin) with favorable outcomes were more prominent in individuals with a higher CHA2DS2-VASc score of at least 3. Among frail patients with AF, OAC treatment was associated with a positive net clinical outcome. Direct OACs provided lower incidences of stroke, bleeding, and mortality, compared with warfarin.

2021 Korean Heart Rhythm Society Guidelines for Catheter or Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Rhythm control therapy is used in atrial fibrillation (AF) management to improve AF-related symptoms along with rate control. AF catheter ablation is effective in maintaining sinus rhythm and has an acceptable complication rate. Compared with antiarrhythmic drugs, AF catheter ablation is superior with respect to arrhythmia-free survival and improvement in the quality of life. Therefore, AF ablation is recommended for rhythm control after the failure of antiarrhythmic drugs and is sometimes considered a first-line therapy for AF patients. Radiofrequency and cryoballoon ablation show similar efficacy, with slightly different complication profiles. Surgery for AF is also an effective rhythm control therapy and should be considered in patients undergoing cardiac surgery or in those with failed catheter ablation. For patients undergoing AF catheter ablation, performing ablation under uninterrupted warfarin or non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant treatment is recommended for periprocedural stroke risk management. Here, we review existing data and discuss the general principles of AF catheter and surgical ablation in patients with AF.

Impact of prior oral anticoagulant use and outcomes on patients from secondary analysis in the AUGUSTUS trial

ObjectiveManaging antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is challenging and can be affected by prior oral anticoagulant...

Incident peptic ulcers and concomitant treatment of direct oral anticoagulants and oral bisphosphonates-a real-world cohort study.

This study examines whether concomitant use of oral bisphosphonates (oBP) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) increases the risk of peptic ulcers more than any drug alone. A population-based cohort study was performed. We sampled a cohort of oBP and DOAC users from a sample of 2,622,742 individuals, consisting of diabetes patients and age- and gender-matched controls, obtained from the Danish National Patient Register. The exposures were concomitant use of oBP and DOAC and single use of DOAC and single use of oBP. The primary endpoint was the first incident peptic ulcer. Information on exposure and outcome were collected from national registries. The period of observation was from 01.01.2008 until 31.12.2018. Unadjusted and adjusted Cox regressions were performed. 8077 individuals received concomitant treatment with DOAC and oBP; 96,451 individuals used DOAC and no oBP; and 118,675 used oBP and no DOAC. The mean duration of follow-up was 1.9years for concomitant users, 2.5years for DOAC users, and 4.5years for oBP users. A total of 4742 individuals with incident peptic ulcers were collected. We observed an increased risk of incident ulcer in users of DOAC and oBP compared to single DOAC treatment in the adjusted analysis (HR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.03; 1.48). However, the effects were abolished when excluding individuals with a previous ulcer. We observed an increased risk of incident ulcer in users of DOAC and oBP compared to users of oBP in the adjusted model (HR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.11; 1.63). Based on our results, concomitant use of oBP and DOAC is associated with a slight increase in the risk of peptic ulcers compared to either drug alone. The prescribing physician should weigh the slight increased risk of ulcer in concomitant users of oBP and DOAC with beneficial reductions in stroke and fractures.

Oral anticoagulant treatment after bioprosthetic valvular intervention or valvuloplasty in patients with atrial fibrillation-A SWEDEHEART study.

AimsTo describe the prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF), use of oral anticoagulants (OAC) and change in antithrombotic treatment patterns during follow-up after valve intervention with a biological prosthesis or valvuloplasty.Methods and resultsAll patients with history of AF or new-onset AF discharged alive after valvular intervention (biological prosthesis or valvuloplasty) between 2010–2016 in Sweden were included (n = 7,362). Information about comorbidities was collected from national patient registers. Exposure to OAC was based on pharmacy dispensation data. In total 4,800 (65.2%) patients had a history of AF, and 2,562 (34.8%) patients developed new-onset AF, with 999 (39.0%) developing new-onset AF within 3 months after intervention. The proportion of patients with biological valve prosthesis was higher in patients with new-onset AF compared to history of AF (p<0.001). CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2 was observed in 83.1% and 75.5% patients with history of AF and new-onset AF, respectively. Warfarin was more frequently dispensed than NOAC at discharge in patients with history of AF (43.9% vs 7.3%), and in patients with new-onset AF (36.6% vs 17.1%). Almost half of the AF population was not dispensed on any OAC at discharge (48.8% in patients with history of AF and 46.3% in patients with new-onset AF).ConclusionIn this real world study of patients with AF and recent valvular intervention, risk of new-onset AF after valvular intervention is high emphasizing need for frequent rhythm monitoring after intervention. A considerable undertreatment with OAC was observed despite being indicated for the majority of the patients. Warfarin was the OAC most frequently dispensed.

What to do with device-detected atrial high-rate episodes: Summary of the evidences.

Cardiac implanted electronic devices (CIEDs), that perform atrial sensing via an atrial electrode, commonly detect self-terminating atrial arrhythmias. Nomenclature of these arrhythmias is defined as atrial high-rate episodes (AHREs) and subclinical atrial fibrillation (SCAF). We have provided a comprehensive summation of the trials regarding the incidence and adverse outcomes of AHREs. The reported incidence of AHRE varies considerably (approximately 10%-70%) between studies depending on the definition of AHRE, duration of follow-up and the clinical profile of the population. There is increasing evidence related with the association between AHREs' and stroke and/or systemic embolism. However, risk of stroke and/or systemic embolism seems to be less than the risk associated with clinical AF. There is still lack of sufficient evidence related with oral anticoagulation (OAC) in patients with AHRE to reduce thromboembolic risk. Although, the strongest association of OAC treatment with reduction in stroke has been reported to be observed among patients with device detected SCAF episodes of >24h; it is still questionable whether AHRE is a direct cause of thromboembolic event or just a marker of increased risk. Results of ongoing randomized clinical trials (NOAH-AFNET 6 and ARTESIA) will provide robust evidence on effect of OAC therapy on AHREs.

Severity of gastrointestinal bleeding is similar between patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants or vitamin K antagonists.

Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a common adverse event related to anticoagulation therapy. However, evidence comparing the severity, etiology and outcome of GIB in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) vs. vitamin K antagonists (VKA) is scarce. To evaluate the severity, etiology and outcomes of GIB in patients under DOACs compared to VKA. Patients under oral anticoagulant therapy admitted to the emergency department with acute GIB were prospectively recruited from July 2016 to January 2018 at a tertiary referral hospital. Demographic and clinical outcome were obtained from medical records. Severity of the GIB event was classified as mild, major or severe according to clinical presentation and the type of support needed. Etiology and location of bleeding, number of packed red blood cells transfused (PRBC) and length of hospital stay were recorded until discharge or in-hospital death. A total of 208 patients with acute GIB under oral anticoagulant treatment were recruited: 119 patients were on VKA and 89 patients on DOAC with similar characteristics. Thirty-one patients had severe GIB; 134 major and 43 mild, with no differences in severity, number of PRBC and length of hospital stay between the groups. Peptic disease was the most frequent etiology of GIB in patients on VKA (20.2 % vs. 13.6%, p=0.20). Diverticular bleeding was the most frequent adverse event in patients on DOAC (14.3% vs. 24.8%, p= 0.056). Severity and clinical outcomes of GIB are similar between patients on DOAC and patients on VKA, regardless of etiology of GIB.

Clinical implications of anticoagulant oral therapy in elderly patients with hip fracture.

Background and aim:Proximal femur fractures (PFFs) are among the most common fractures, especially in the elderly population. A PFF often represents a life-changing event. Their dramatic effects are attributable not only to the massive hemorrhages caused by the fracture, but also and due to the high risk of dramatic complications. These risks are supposed to be even higher for patients under oral anticoagulant treatment. In this study we evaluated how oral anticoagulant therapy effected patient’s prognosis.Methods:Ours was a case-control review of geriatric-aged patients treated surgically for proximal femur fractures between 2013 and 2019. Cases were divided in 2 groups depending if they were (Group A) or were not (Group B) under oral anticoagulant therapy at the moment of hospitalization.Results:200 cases were included in our study: 100 in Group A and 100 in Group B. Surgical delay was significantly higher for cases under oral anticoagulant treatment compared to the other cases. Group A cases were transfused with a significantly higher frequency and with more blood units compared to Group B (p=0.0300; p=0.013). Combined cardiological and vascular complications occurred in 21 cases (10.5%), being significantly more common in Group A (16) than Group B (5), as testified by a chi-square test (P=0.011).Conclusions:Cases under oral anticoagulant therapy are fragile patients with a higher risk to develop massive hemorrhages. For this reasons, it is mandatory to achieve an early stabilization of patient’s clinical conditions and then perform surgery as soon as possible. (www.actabiomedica.it)

Oral Anticoagulant Treatment in Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis - Results of an International Audit

Oral Anticoagulant Treatment in Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis - Results of an International Audit

Zbrinjavanje krvarenja kod pacijenta na terapiji ne-vitamin K oralnim antikoagulansima - prikaz slučaja

Introduction: Management of haemorrhage depends on the severity of bleeding and associated injuries. In this paper, we present a case of bleeding patient on the anticoagulants for which there was no specific reversal agent. Aim of the study is to present the management of haemorrhage in a patient on anticoagulant therapy in the General Hospital in Loznica, Serbia. Material and methods: Overview of hospital documentation and physician's reports. Case report: In the abscence of a specific reversal agents and laboratory tests, management of haemorrhage included methods of mechanical/surgical haemorrhage control, application of antifibrinolitics and administration of blood products, such as fresh frozen plasma (FFP), combined with forced diuresis and 7-day clinial follow-up period. NOAC treatment was suspended until the complete stopping of bleeding. After the bleeding was stopped, non-vitamin-K oral anticoagulants (NOAC) treatment was resumed with lowered dosis. Conclusion: In the abscence of specific reversal agents, reversion of NOAC effects is possible in minor haemorrhage. Patients with major haemorrhage should be treated with available specific reversal agents and/or prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC). However, this type of therapy is currrently available only in the terciary health care intitutions.