Option For Breast Reconstruction Research Articles

Chest wall perforator flaps (LTAP and LICAP) for total breast reconstruction

Background: The use of chest wall perforator flaps for partial breast reconstruction is well described. In select patients, particularly those unsuitable for standard techniques, these flaps can also provide an autologous total breast reconstruction (TBR) option. We describe the experience of a tertiary referral centre.

Single-stage buried autologous breast reconstruction (BABR)

Breast reconstructive standards are increasingly high oncologically, aesthetically, and practically. Autologous breast reconstruction remains the gold standard which, buried, after nipple-sparing mastectomy (where oncologically safe) or wise pattern reduction for large or ptotic patients, with contralateral symmetrisation where required, enables single-stage reconstruction. However, previous series report prohibitively high revision rates. This series prospectively compares a series of buried and non-buried free flaps for breast reconstruction. All breast reconstructions with free autologous tissue transfer, buried or with a cutaneous paddle, conducted over 8 years by a single surgeon were included. Demographic, oncologic and reconstructive details, immediate complications and revision surgeries were recorded and compared between the two groups. A total of 182 free flaps were performed on 156 patients, 69 buried and 113 with cutaneous paddles. There were no significant demographic or complication differences between the two groups. Of the buried group, 51% did not require further surgery compared to 29% of the paddle group. Buried autologous breast reconstruction is a safe and aesthetic option for breast reconstruction, and potentially single stage. This is particularly true where it is combined with nipple-sparing mastectomy (where oncologically safe) or breast reduction mastectomy, and contralateral symmetrisation, where required. Further research could include patient reported outcome measures and cost analysis.

Effects of COVID-19 on mastectomy and breast reconstruction rates: A national surgical sample.

BackgroundThe COVID‐19 pandemic profoundly impacted breast cancer treatment in 2020. Guidelines initially halted elective procedures, subsequently encouraging less invasive surgeries and restricting breast reconstruction options. We examined the effects of COVID‐19 on oncologic breast surgery and reconstruction rates during the first year of the pandemic.MethodsUsing the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, we performed an observational examination of female surgical breast cancer patients from 2017 to 2020. We analyzed annual rates of lumpectomy, mastectomy (unilateral/contralateral prophylactic/bilateral prophylactic), and breast reconstruction (alloplastic/autologous) and compared 2019 and 2020 reconstruction cohorts to evaluate the effect of COVID‐19.ResultsFrom 2017 to 2020, 175 949 patients underwent lumpectomy or mastectomy with or without reconstruction. From 2019 to 2020, patient volume declined by 10.7%, unilateral mastectomy rates increased (70.5% to 71.9%, p = 0.003), and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rates decreased. While overall reconstruction rates were unchanged, tissue expander reconstruction increased (64.0% to 68.4%, p < 0.001) and direct‐to‐implant and autologous reconstruction decreased. Outpatient alloplastic reconstruction increased (65.7% to 73.8%, p < 0.0001), and length of hospital stay decreased for all reconstruction patients (p < 0.0001).ConclusionsIn 2020, there was a nearly 11% decline in breast cancer surgeries, comparable mastectomy and reconstruction rates, increased use of outpatient alloplastic reconstruction, and significantly reduced in‐hospital time across all reconstruction types.

Prevention of Abdominal Bulging Using Onlay Dermal Autografts from Discarded Zone IV TRAM Flap Tissue.

While the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap is a popular option for abdominal-based breast reconstruction, abdominal wall morbidities such as bulging or hernia remain a concern. Here, we introduced a surgical technique for reinforcing the abdominal wall using an onlay autograft obtained from discarded zone IV tissue following a primary closure. We compared abdominal wall morbidities between patients receiving an onlay graft and those receiving primary closure only. We retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of patients who underwent breast reconstruction using a TRAM flap between December 2018 and May 2021. Additionally, we assessed donor-site morbidities based on physical examination. Of the 79 patients included, 38 had received a dermal graft and 41 had not. Donor-site morbidities occurred in 10 (24.5%) and 1 (2.6%) patients, and bulging occurred in 8 (19.5%) and 1 (2.6%) patients in the primary closure and dermal autograft groups, respectively. A statistically significant difference in the incidence of bulging was observed between the groups (p = 0.030). In conclusion, the introduction of a dermal autograft after primary closure can successfully ameliorate morbidities at the TRAM flap site.

Long-Term Outcome Analysis and Technical Refinements after Autologous Breast Reconstruction with PAP Flap: What We Have Learnt

Introduction: The profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap represents a valuable alternative to the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap which, nowadays, is considered the golden standard for autologous breast reconstruction. The goal of this study was to evaluate the long-term satisfaction, functional outcomes of the donor site following PAP flap-based breast reconstruction and to present our personal learning experience along with suggestions for technique refinements. Methods: In this prospective single-center appraisal, 18 patients who underwent PAP flap-based breast reconstruction between January 2016 and November 2019 were enrolled. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and the Breast-Q questionnaire were employed to evaluate the results 12 months postoperative. Data were analyzed with the Q-Score program. Complications were recorded in the medical database and classified with the Clavien-Dindo classification. Results: In the questionable time frame, 164 female patients underwent free flap breast reconstruction. Of those, 18 patients that received PAP flaps (9 bilateral) were included in this study. We recorded one flap loss because of venous failure. Most complications concerned the donor site, including hematoma, seroma, and wound healing problems. Patients’ satisfaction was high at 12 months post-surgery, despite critical evaluation of the donor site scar. Conclusion: The PAP flap serves as an excellent option for breast reconstruction in patients who do not have abundant abdominal tissue. The overall clinical outcome was good and patients’ evaluation showed high satisfaction after 12 months despite high complication rates. Modifications in planning and flap harvesting might improve the donor site outcome and the overall complication rate.

Comparing Donor Site Morbidity for Autologous Breast Reconstruction: Thigh vs. Abdomen.

Background:Although abdominally-based free flaps have long been the gold standard, the profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap has emerged as an important alternative option for autologous breast reconstruction. The aim of this study was to directly compare the donor site morbidity of using the PAP versus deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free flap.Methods:We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction using a DIEP and/or PAP flap from January 2017 to December 2020. In total, 30 PAP flap patients were matched with 60 DIEP flap patients. Outcomes included donor site wound dehiscence, length of stay, narcotic consumption, and pain scores. Patient-reported outcomes for the thigh versus abdomen were compared using questions derived from the BREAST-Q.Results:There was no significant difference in length of stay (P = 0.182), reoperation rates (P = 0.999), flap failure rates (P = 0.999), or donor site complications (P = 0.999). Both groups had similar mean pain scores, maximum pain scores, daily and total narcotic requirements. In comparing the thigh or abdomen as a donor site, there was no difference in frequency of negative symptoms (difficulty with daily activities, discomfort, tightness, and negative impact on ability to work) or satisfaction scores as related to their appearance in and out of clothing and the appearance of the scar.Conclusions:The thigh and abdomen are both suitable donor sites for autologous breast reconstruction with similar flap-related and patient-reported outcomes. The ultimate decision regarding whether to use a PAP or DIEP flap for breast reconstruction should be tailored based on patient anatomy and preference.

Filling the Upper Pole with the Pectoralis Major Muscle Flap in Profunda Femoris Artery Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction.

Background and Objectives: Among many donor site options for autologous breast reconstruction, the use of the profunda femoris artery perforator (PAP) flap has become common in patients who are not suitable for the gold standard procedure, the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap. However, its limited volume has precluded its wide use in breast reconstruction. The aim of this report was to demonstrate the effectiveness of a method in which the anatomical position of the pectoralis major muscle was adjusted to augment the volume of the superior pole of the breast during PAP flap transfer. A comparison was made with a conventional PAP flap breast reconstruction. Materials and Methods: Fifty-nine consecutive cases where unilateral autologous breast reconstruction was performed using the vertically designed PAP flap were retrospectively reviewed. Conventional PAP flap transfer was performed in 36 patients (Group 1), and PAP flap transfer with pectoralis major muscle augmentation was performed in 23 patients (Group 2). Results: The patient satisfaction at 12 months postoperatively was statistically greater in Group 2, with the pectoralis major muscle augmentation, than in Group 1 [23/36 (64%) vs. 22/23 (96%), p = 0.005]. There were no significant differences in postoperative complication rates at the reconstructed site [2/36 (5.6%) vs. 0/23 (0%), p = 0.52]. Conclusions: Higher patient satisfaction could be achieved with pectoralis major muscle augmentation in PAP flap breast reconstruction without increasing the postoperative complication rate at the reconstructed site.

Optimizing Aesthetics in Reconstructive Breast Surgery Using Muscle-Sparing Latissimus Dorsi Flap in Radiated and Nonradiated Patients.

The latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap (LDMF) has been a workhorse for breast reconstruction. Its high rate of donor-site morbidity has led to the advent of the muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi flap (MSLDF). However, there are very limited reports using the MSLDF in irradiated patients. Prior studies of MSLDF have either precluded previously radiated patients from receiving MSLDF or have included them as part of their larger MSLSDF cohort without specifically analyzing their outcome as a separate group or comparing them to the traditional LDMF group. We describe the technique and outcome of MSLDF in both radiated and nonradiated patients and compare the outcome to our LDMF patients. A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing breast reconstruction between 2003 and 2020 using either a pedicled MSLDF or LDMF with a transverse skin paddle was conducted. All patients underwent a 2-stage reconstruction with the flap and tissue expander placement done during the first stage, and replacement with implant and, if needed, fat grafting to enhance soft tissue during the second stage. Complications, subjective functional morbidity, and aesthetic outcomes were reviewed. A total of 35 MSLDFs and 40 LDMFs were performed: 24 MSLDFs (69%) and 25 LDMFs (63%) were inset into a previously irradiated field. There were 2 cases of infection requiring explantation in both MSLDF (8.3%) and LDMF (8.0%) radiated cohorts. There were no cases of donor-site seroma in the MSLDF cohorts versus 12 (30%) in the LDMF cohorts. Minor distal tip superficial epidermolysis was seen in 5 MSLDFs (14.3%), 3 of which were in the radiated cohort, and in 1 LDMF (2.5%) radiated cohort with no cases of flap loss. Functional and aesthetic outcomes were satisfactory. Four patients who had a unilateral MSLDF had a completion upper back lift. This is the largest series to date demonstrating the use of the MSLDF in both nonradiated and radiated patients and comparing it to a standard LDMF for breast reconstruction by the same surgeon. The pedicled MSLDF is a versatile option for breast reconstruction in radiated patients, and radiation should not be considered a contraindication for its use.

Autologous Breast Reconstruction is Associated with Lower 90-day Readmission Rates.

Background:Breast reconstruction is associated with improved quality of life after mastectomy. Options for breast reconstruction include autologous and implant-based methods. Although autologous reconstruction is more technically challenging and requires longer operative time, it is thought of as the gold standard. Our study examined differences in 90-day readmission rates between implant-based and autologous breast reconstruction using discharge data from the National Readmission Database, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.Methods:The National Readmission Database was used to identify patients undergoing postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Patients were selected using ICD-10 PCS codes linked to autologous and implant-based reconstruction. Ninety-day readmission rates were determined. After matching the two groups on a 1:1 basis for baseline comorbidities and demographics, a multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to variables associated with higher readmission rates.Results:The leading diagnoses associated with readmissions were infectious and pulmonary. After one to one matching, autologous breast reconstruction, private insurance versus Medicaid, and income quartile 4 versus 1 were all less likely to be readmitted within 90 days of discharge. Patients with a high Charlson index and those with a longer length of initial hospital stay are significantly more likely to be readmitted within 90 days.Conclusions:Patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction were 23% less likely to be readmitted within 90 days from discharge. Fewer comorbidities, shorter length of hospital stay, and higher socioeconomic status are also associated with lower readmission rates following breast reconstruction.

Abstract P4-09-04: When discussing breast reconstruction, do psychosocial characteristics influence which surgical options patients remember?

Abstract Introduction Although decisions about breast reconstruction surgery include patients’ perspectives, little is known about which options patients recall discussing and how their psychosocial factors influence their recall. The purpose of this study was to explore whether psychosocial factors were associated with the breast reconstruction options a patient remembers discussing with their reconstructive surgeon, controlling for medical factors that impact surgical decision-making. Material and methods From 2011 to 2014, we recruited English-speaking adults whose legal sex was female who had an appointment at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center to discuss breast reconstruction. After the clinical consultation, participants indicated which reconstruction procedures they remembered discussing with their reconstructive surgeon (choose all that apply): (1) implant-based, (2) tissue-based, (3) combination of implant and tissue. Analyses focused on three groups: participants who remembered (a) only an implant-based option being discussed; (b) only a tissue-based option being discussed; and (c) implant-based, tissue-based, and combination options being discussed. We investigated the association between which reconstruction option(s) a participant remembered discussing with her reconstructive surgeon and her body image investment (Appearance Schemas Inventory-Revised (ASI-R)), body image (Body Image Scale (BIS)), and overall psychological distress (Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18)), considering participant age and Body Mass Index (BMI). Multiple multinomial logistic regression models were used to investigate the associations of participant factors with the reconstruction options they remembered discussing with their surgeon. Akaike information criterion (AIC) was applied to select the best-fitting multivariable model. Results Out of 306 participants,138 participants remembered discussing only implant-based reconstruction; 118 participants remembered discussing only tissue-based reconstruction; and 50 participants remembered discussing implant-based, tissue-based, and combination options. The majority of participants were Caucasian (74.8%) and non-Hispanic (75.2%). BMI, body image investment, and body image were identified as associated with remembering different reconstruction options being discussed and were included in the multiple multinomial logistic regression model. Greater body image investment (i.e., higher ASI-R composite score) was significantly associated with higher odds of remembering discussing only implant-based reconstruction as compared to remembering discussing only tissue-based reconstruction, adjusted for the other factors in the model (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.04-2.79, p-value = 0.035). Greater body image dissatisfaction or concerns (i.e., higher BIS score) was associated with higher odds of remembering discussing only tissue-based reconstruction compared to remembering discussing only implant-based reconstruction, adjusted for the other factors in the model (adjusted OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.00-1.08, p-value = 0.045). Conclusion Our findings indicate that even when adjusted for BMI, patients with higher body image investment may be more likely to remember discussions about implant-based reconstruction, and patients with greater body image dissatisfaction may be more likely to remember discussions about tissue-based reconstruction. Tailored counseling approaches may be recommended to ensure all patients equally attend to and consider all medically-relevant options when discussing breast reconstruction surgery. Citation Format: Haoqi Wang, Jun Liu, Mary Catherine Bordes, Deepti Chopra, Gregory P Reece, Mia K Markey, Aubri S Hoffman. When discussing breast reconstruction, do psychosocial characteristics influence which surgical options patients remember? [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-09-04.

Fat Grafting following Internal Tissue Expansion: An Option for Breast Reconstruction after Total Mastectomy.

Background:Breast reconstruction is currently performed as standard practice.Methods:A prospective study was performed of patients after total mastectomy who underwent autologous breast reconstruction with fat grafting (FG) combined with internal tissue expansion between September 2015 and December 2020. The patients were classified into groups A to F depending on the steps of breast reconstruction. Groups A and B described patients with completed breast reconstruction with FG and expander removal, with or without nipple/areola complex reconstruction. C described patients during deflation of the expander combined with simultaneous FG. D described patients after expander implantation and refilling. E described patients after first FG, and F included patients who discontinued reconstruction with the described method and converted to reconstruction with a breast implant.Results:Among 22 treated patients‚ two were after first FG (9.09%‚ group E), two were after expander implantation and refilling (9.09%‚ group D), three were during deflation of the expander combined with simultaneous FG (13.63%‚ group C), and four (18.18%) had completed breast reconstruction—two (9.09%) without NAC reconstruction and symmetrization (group B) and two (9.09%) with completed breast reconstruction (group A). In 11 patients (50%), breast reconstruction was abandoned after expander implantation and one to three FG procedures (group F), converting to breast reconstruction with a breast implant.Conclusions:This study demonstrated successful breast reconstruction using FG and expander implantation. Breast reconstruction using this method is safe and enables possible abandonment at any treatment stage, as well as conversion to breast reconstruction with implants.

Immediate Breast Reconstruction Using the Goldilocks Procedure: A Balance between More Surgery and Patient Satisfaction.

Since its first description in 2012, the Goldilocks procedure has become an option for immediate breast reconstruction, particularly for obese patients who are poor candidates for traditional implant or autologous reconstruction. In this work, the authors performed a longitudinal study of patients who underwent mastectomy with Goldilocks reconstruction to assess the incidence of additional surgical procedures, and to assess surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction. A retrospective review of patients who underwent mastectomy with the Goldilocks procedure only at Mayo Clinic Rochester between January of 2012 and September of 2019 was performed. Demographics, complications, additional breast procedures performed to attain the final results, and patient-reported outcomes using the BREAST-Q were recorded. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify statistical associations and risk factors. Sixty-three patients (108 breasts) were included. Mean age was 57.8 years. Mean body mass index was 37.6 kg/m2. Median follow-up time after the mastectomy with the Goldilocks procedure was 15 months. The major complication rate within the first 30 days was 9.3 percent. Forty-four breasts (40.7 percent) underwent additional surgery. Dyslipidemia was significantly associated with an increased risk of additional surgery (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.00; p = 0.045). Scores in the four BREAST-Q domains were not statistically different between patients who had additional procedures and those who did not. Based on the results, the authors recommend a thorough preoperative discussion with patients who are candidates for the Goldilocks procedure to explore all options for reconstruction and their expectations, because it is crucial to reduce the necessity for additional operations in this high-risk population. Risk, III.

Creating a Biological Breast Implant with an Omental Fat-Augmented Free Flap.

Women with inadequate myocutaneous or fasciocutaneous soft-tissue donor sites for breast reconstruction after mastectomy are mostly limited to implants. Alternative substitutes are needed for those who do not want-or in whom there are contraindications for-implant-based reconstruction. The authors report a novel technique using an omental fat-augmented free flap to create an autologous breast mound that has comparable shape and projection to a breast implant. Three patients with breast cancer who desired unilateral reconstruction were identified in the period 2019 to 2020. All had insufficient traditional autologous sites and were averse to the use of implants. A nipple-sparing mastectomy was performed, and the omentum was laparoscopically harvested and fat-grafted ex vivo and then encased in acellular dermal matrix for microvascular anastomoses. The body mass indexes of the three patients were 17.6, 25, and 28.3 kg/m2. Each individual's mastectomy specimens and corresponding omentum plus fat-grafting weights were 113.7/228, 271/293, and 270/360 g. No postoperative complications occurred. The reconstructed breast remains soft, with stable breast volume at 6 months and without evidence of fat necrosis. This novel use of fat grafting into an omental flap enveloped in acellular dermal matrix, the omental fat-augmented free flap, provides a viable and successful autologous alternative for patients who are not candidates for traditional autologous breast reconstruction options because of body habitus or personal preference.

Lateral chest wall perforator flaps in partial breast reconstruction

BackgroundBreast conserving surgery (BCS) has been a standard procedure for the treatment of breast cancer instead of mastectomy whenever possible. Lateral chest wall perforator flaps are one of the volume replacement techniques that participate in increasing the rate of BCS especially in small- to moderate-sized breasts with good cosmetic outcome. In this study, we tried to evaluate the outcome of those flaps as an oncoplastic procedure instead of the conventional flaps.MethodsThis study included 26 patients who underwent partial mastectomy with immediate reconstruction using lateral chest wall perforator flaps in the period from October 2019 to November 2020. The operative time, techniques, and complications were recorded. The cosmetic outcome was assessed 3 months post-radiation therapy through a questionnaire and photographic assessment.ResultsLateral intercostal artery perforator (LICAP), lateral thoracic artery perforator (LTAP) and combined flaps were performed in 24, 1, and 1 patients, respectively. The mean operative time was 129.6 ± 13.2 min. The flap length ranged from 10 to 20 cm and its width from 5 to 9 cm. Overall patients’ satisfaction was observed to be 88.5% as either excellent or good and the photographic assessment was 96.2% as either excellent or good.ConclusionsLateral chest wall perforator flaps are reliable and safe option for partial breast reconstruction with an acceptable aesthetic outcome. In the era of oncoplastic breast surgery, they deserve to gain attention especially with the advantages of some modifications added to the classic technique.

Peculiarities of postoperative period in women depending on breast reconstruction option

Peculiarities of postoperative period in women depending on breast reconstruction option

Long-Term Effectiveness of a Decision Support App (Pink Journey) for Women Considering Breast Reconstruction Surgery: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

BackgroundVarious kinds of breast reconstruction (BR) options, including implants and autologous, and surgery techniques, including traditional and endoscope assisted, can be used to perform surgery. All options have their own advantages and disadvantages. Women decide on an option depending on the values and preferences they emphasize. Lacking knowledge about BR or having decision difficulties during the treatment decision process makes women experience more decision regret, psychological distress, and poor body image. Delivering decision support with a values clarification exercise using eHealth approaches would be beneficial for patient outcomes.ObjectiveThis study aims to examine the effects of a decision support app on decision-making quality and psychological morbidity for women considering BR surgery.MethodsThis randomized controlled trial included women who were over 20 years of age and were newly diagnosed with breast cancer and candidates for mastectomy. Women having an option for breast conservation were excluded. After being referred from the outpatient physician, the women provided consent and completed the baseline assessment. Women allocated to the control group (CG) received usual care and were provided with a pamphlet with information about types of surgery and the advantages and disadvantages of different surgery types. Women allocated to the intervention group (IG) were given the same pamphlet and guided to use the Pink Journey app to support their decision. Then they were also prompted to discuss the opinions with their significant others. Finally, the decision-making process of using the app was printed out for women that they could take home. Decision conflict, anxiety, and depression were measured at baseline. At 1 week after the intervention (T1) and at 1 month (T2), 8 months (T3), and 12 months (T4) after surgery, the women completed decision conflict, decision regret, anxiety, depression, and body image scales. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed.ResultsFrom February 2018 to July 2019, 96 women were randomly assigned to the CG (n=48) or the IG (n=48). Results revealed that body image distress declined significantly for the IG but increased for the CG. The interaction of time and group also reached significance, indicating a significant decrease in body image distress from baseline in the IG compared with the CG after the 12th month (T4) follow-up (β=–2.25, standard error=1.01, P=.027). However, there was no significant difference in decision conflict (P=.21-.87), decision regret (P=.44-.55), anxiety (P=.26-.33), and depression (P=.20-.75), indicating that the decrease in these outcomes in the IG was not greater than those in the CG.ConclusionsAlthough we found no effect on decision conflict, decision regret, anxiety, and depression, a decision aid that combines surgery information and values clarification can help women reduce their body image distress.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04190992; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04190992

Breast reconstruction using the profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap: Technical refinements and evolution, outcomes, and patient satisfaction based on 116 consecutive flaps

When a deep inferior epigastric artery flap is not suitable, the profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap can be a good alternative for autologous breast reconstruction. Popularity of the PAP flap is expanding, but it is still only slowly being adopted worldwide. We report our experience with 116 consecutive PAP flaps showing refinements and evolution of the technique towards improvement in outcomes and patients' satisfaction. We prospectively collected data from consecutive PAP flap breast reconstructions performed from 2016 to 2019. Patients' demographics, pre-, intra-, postoperative data, and revision procedures were analyzed. The BREAST-Q and a specific questionnaire investigating outcomes at the donor site were completed preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively. One-hundred and sixteen PAP flaps were performed in 86 patients, 64 unilateral and 22 bilateral breast reconstructions. Mean body mass index was 24.72kg/m2 (range 18.9-29.2) and mean flap weight was 251.30g (range 152-455g). Complications included donor site hematoma (1.7%), seroma (2.6%), fat necrosis (1.7%), and wound dehiscence (2.6%). No arterial/venous thrombosis nor flap losses were recorded. Patients reported high satisfaction in all BREAST-Q domains, with mean postoperative scores being higher than preoperative ones, suggesting a positive effect in quality of life and satisfaction. Scores were significant in the satisfaction with breast domain (p=0.0016). Breast reconstruction with PAP flap yields a high success, low complications, and excellent cosmetic outcomes in the breast and donor sites. It improves patients' satisfaction and quality of life; hence, it can be considered an excellent option for autologous breast reconstruction.

Unilateral breast reconstruction using double transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flaps

When the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is unavailable, autologous reconstruction of a moderate-to-large breast presents a surgical challenge. We retrospectively review our experience of unilateral breast reconstruction using double transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flaps and highlight specific technical considerations. Thirty-four patients underwent double TUG flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction between 2012 and 2020. The average patient age was 50 years and the average body mass index (BMI) was 23.1kg/m2. In all cases, the indication for surgery was breast cancer: 31 patients had immediate reconstruction, 11 had simultaneous axillary surgery and eight had primary contralateral symmetrising surgery. Of the 68 TUG flaps, 67 (98.5%) were successful. The mean operative time was 5h 50min (195-460min) and the mean combined flap weight was 551g (279-916g). Eight patients returned to the operating theatre in the early post-operative period and five patients underwent secondary lipofilling to address contour deformities. Most commonly (n=22), the flaps were oriented horizontally/obliquely, with one flap anastomosed medially to the internal mammary axis and the other anastomosed lateral to the subscapular system. The internal mammary artery perforators and serratus anterior artery provided the best vessel calibre match with the TUG vessels. Double TUG reconstruction is a safe and reliable option for unilateral breast reconstruction and is an important option when the DIEP flap is unavailable.

Extreme oncoplasty for centrally located breast cancer in small non-ptotic breasts: extending the indications of chest wall perforator flaps with areolar reconstruction.

BackgroundBreast cancers located centrally require excision of nipple-areola complex. A simple central wide excision is a safe option but results in suboptimal aesthetic outcome. An oncoplastic option involves therapeutic mammoplasty with or without areolar reconstruction, limited to moderate and large ptotic breasts. For small non-ptotic breasts, most surgeons would resort to mastectomy with/without reconstruction.MethodsLateral chest wall perforator flap (CWPF) is an option for partial breast reconstruction in small to moderate sized, non-ptotic breasts for laterally located tumours. We have extended the application of CWPF for central tumours to avoid mastectomy in selected patients.ResultsWe here present a case series of four patients with small to medium-sized non-ptotic breasts, who had centrally located breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS). Three patients had single stage CWPF reconstruction, and one had central excision with immediate reconstruction following a failed attempt at therapeutic mammoplasty. All had the areola reconstructed using flap skin; one patient had simultaneous nipple reconstruction.ConclusionsCWPF is an option for treatment of centrally located breast cancers/DCIS needing nipple-areola complex excision for patients wishing to avoid mastectomy. Patients with small to medium-sized non-ptotic breasts are suitable, and need to be carefully selected.

Inferior gluteal artery perforator (IGAP) flap versus profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap as an alternative option for free autologous breast reconstruction

When patients are unsuitable for deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction, the inferior gluteal artery perforator (IGAP) flap has been used as an alternative option. However, the profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap is also gaining popularity as an alternative to the DIEP flap for several reasons. This retrospective cohort study compares baseline characteristics, peri- and post-operative outcomes following IGAP flap and PAP flap breast reconstructions after mastectomy for cancer. In a single center in the UK, from September 2008 through December 2016, 43 women underwent IGAP Flap(s) breast reconstruction and 51 received PAP flap(s) breast reconstructions. Statistical analysis was performed to compare baseline, peri-operative and post-operative variables between the two reconstruction methods. Perioperative complications requiring reoperation were experienced in women undergoing IGAP flap breast reconstructions only (21% versus 0%, p=0.001), principally due to the risk of total flap failure (12% versus 0%, p=0.01). Women undergoing IGAP flap breast reconstructions were at significantly higher odds of revision surgery (OR 17 [95% CI: 5.5-53], p<0.001), which was unchanged after adjusting for bilateral reconstructions (adjusted OR 18 [95% CI: 5.3-58], p<0.001). PAP flaps appear to be associated with significantly fewer complications and revision surgeries than IGAP flaps for breast reconstruction in women undergoing mastectomy for cancer and who are unsuitable for a DIEP flap breast reconstruction.