Opioid Errors Research Articles

Opioids for acute pain management in children.

Opioids are integral to multimodal analgesic regimens in children with moderate to severe acute pain. Throughout normal childhood there are marked changes in physiology, and social and psychological development that influence the perception and expression of pain, the pharmacology of opioids, and how they are used. A multidimensional pain assessment is key to guiding appropriate opioid prescribing. Most of the commonly used opioids in adults are used in children, with the increasing exception of codeine (as a result of regulatory change), and are generally well tolerated. Patient groups at increased risk of ventilatory impairment include neonates and those with obstructive sleep apnoea, severe neurodevelopmental conditions, trisomy 21, and severe epilepsy. Slow-release opioids are not recommended for general use, but may be used in select populations, for example, following scoliosis surgery, major trauma or burns. Prescribing and administration errors are a major issue in paediatrics generally; the potential consequences of opioid prescribing or administration errors are serious, particularly following hospital discharge. Opioids prescribed at discharge are frequently in excess of a child's analgesic requirements; three to five days supply appears sufficient for the majority of common paediatric operations. Discharge opioid prescriptions have been linked to long-term opioid use in adolescents with risk factors. Misuse of prescription opioids by adolescents is also concerning, with prevalence estimates ranging from 1.1% to 20%. Caregivers have a tendency to underdose opioids in their children; caregiver education may improve appropriate administration. Caregivers must also be provided with instructions on safe storage and disposal of unused opioids.

Opioid-related harm in a quaternary pediatric hospital: A 5-year review.

Opioid therapy in pediatrics may be particularly prone to error, yet the incidence of opioid-related medication error and harm has not yet been described in the pediatric inpatient setting. We reviewed a prospectively compiled medication safety database from November 1, 2012 to October 31, 2017. Reports originated from voluntary reporting, hospital code events, naloxone administrations, and reports of unexpected experiences of patient pain. Time, location, error characteristics, drug, route, prescription, error phase, mechanisms, harm, and outcome were collected for all reports. Error and harm were classified by the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCC MERP) system. Over 697 opioid medication safety reports were included during the study period. Opioids were administered at a rate of 79.26 administrations per 100 patient bed days, with morphine and hydromorphone administered at 62 versus 15 administrations per 100 bed days, respectively. Overall error rate was 0.94 errors per 103 patient days. Although the absolute rate of error reporting was greater for morphine (0.65 errors reported per 103 opioid administrations) than for hydromorphone, the adjusted incidence of harm was 0.211 per 103 hydromorphone administrations compared to 0.086 per 103 morphine administrations. 47 opioid errors resulted in harm, and administration errors (29) were almost twice as common as prescribing errors (15). We report and aim to establish a comparative reference point for incidence of opioid-related error and harm adjusted for both hospital bed days and total opioid administrations within the pediatric hospital inpatient setting based on the above findings.

Mitigating opioid errors in inpatient palliative care: A qualitative study

BackgroundOpioids are a high-risk medicine used in high doses and volumes in specialist palliative care inpatient services to manage palliative patients’ pain and other symptoms. Despite the high volume of opioid use in this care setting, serious errors with opioids are exceedingly rare. However, little is known about the factors that mitigate opioid errors in specialist palliative care inpatient services. AimTo explore palliative care clinicians’ perceptions of factors that mitigate opioid errors in specialist palliative care inpatient services. Methods and designA qualitative study using focus groups and semi-structured interviews. Participants and settingRegistered nurses, doctors, and/or pharmacists (‘clinicians’) who were involved with and/or had oversight of the services’ opioid delivery and/or opioid quality and safety processes, employed by one of three specialist palliative care inpatient services in metropolitan NSW. FindingsFifty-eight participants took part in this study, three-quarters (76%) of which were palliative care nurses. A positive opioid safety culture was central to mitigating opioid errors in specialist palliative care inpatient services. This culture of opioid safety was founded on clear and consistent safety messages from leadership, clinicians empowered to work together and practise safely, and a non-punitive approach to errors when they occurred. The clinical nurse educator was seen as pivotal to shaping, driving and reinforcing safe opioid delivery practices across the palliative care service. ConclusionCreating and sustaining a positive opioid safety culture, and promoting a non-punitive approach to opioid error and reporting, is essential to mitigating opioid errors in the specialist palliative care inpatient setting.

The Safer Prescription of Opioids Tool (SPOT) — a novel clinical decision support digital health platform for opioid conversion in palliative and end-of-life care: a single centre pilot study

BackgroundOpioid conversion is complex and currently performed manually using tables of approximate equivalence, often in high pressure clinical situations. Apps that offer opioid dose conversion are available but there are concerns about their accuracy, reliability, and clinical validation.AimThe study evaluated a novel opioid dose conversion app, The Safer Prescription of Opioids Tool (SPOT), as a clinician decision support (CDS) platform. The secondary objective was to use SPOT to describe patterns of opioid dose conversion in palliative and end-of-life care.MethodThis prospective clinical utility single-centre pilot study followed a mixed methods design. Prescribers completed an initial survey exploring their current opioid prescribing practice. Thereafter prescribers used SPOT for opioid dosage conversions in parallel to their usual clinical practice. Lastly, prescribers evaluated SPOT through a survey and focus group. SPOT was evaluated using clinical data across primary, secondary and tertiary care in palliative care and end of life care settings at a Scottish Health Board in both out-of-hours and in-hours.ResultsSPOT correctly matched the Gold Standard result in 258 of 268 (96.3%) calculations. Users had a statistically significant increase in confidence in prescribing opioids after using SPOT. A majority (62%) of conversions were for cancer pain. Focus group feedback highlighted perceived benefits in Quality Improvement and Safety when using SPOT.ConclusionSPOT is a safe, reliable and validated CDS that has significant potential to reduce harms from opioid dosing errors, particularly in primary care, including rural primary care, and the out-of-hours setting.

The Safer Prescription of Opioids Tool (SPOT): A Novel Clinical Decision Support Digital Health Platform for Opioid Conversion in Palliative and End of Life Care-A Single-Centre Pilot Study.

Opioid errors are a leading cause of patient harm. Active failures in opioid dose conversion can contribute to error. Conversion is complex and is currently performed manually using tables of approximate equivalence. Apps that offer opioid dose double-checking are available but there are concerns about their accuracy and clinical validation. This study evaluated a novel opioid dose conversion app, The Safer Prescription of Opioids Tool (SPOT), a CE-marked Class I medical device, as a clinician decision support (CDS) platform. This single-centre prospective clinical utility pilot study followed a mixed methods design. Prescribers completed an initial survey exploring their current opioid prescribing practice. Thereafter prescribers used SPOT for opioid dosage conversions in parallel to their usual clinical practice, then evaluated SPOT through a survey and focus group. SPOT matched the Gold Standard result in 258 of 268 (96.3%) calculations. The 10 instances (3.7%) when SPOT did not match were due to a rounding error. Users had a statistically significant increase in confidence in prescribing opioids after using SPOT. Focus group feedback highlighted benefits in Quality Improvement and Safety when using SPOT. SPOT is a safe, reliable and validated CDS that has potential to reduce harms from opioid dosing errors.

Clinicians’ perceptions of opioid error–contributing factors in inpatient palliative care services: A qualitative study

Background: Opioid errors are a leading cause of patient harm and adversely impact palliative care inpatients’ pain and symptom management. Yet, the factors contributing to opioid errors in palliative care are poorly understood. Identifying and better understanding the individual and system factors contributing to these errors is required to inform targeted strategies. Objectives: To explore palliative care clinicians’ perceptions of the factors contributing to opioid errors in Australian inpatient palliative care services. Design: A qualitative study using focus groups or semi-structured interviews. Settings: Three specialist palliative care inpatient services in New South Wales, Australia. Participants: Inpatient palliative care clinicians who are involved with, and/or have oversight of, the services’ opioid delivery or quality and safety processes. Methods: Deductive thematic content analysis of the qualitative data. The Yorkshire Contributory Factors Framework was applied to identify error-contributing factors. Findings: A total of 58 clinicians participated in eight focus groups and 20 semi-structured interviews. Nine key error contributory factor domains were identified, including: active failures; task characteristics of opioid preparation; clinician inexperience; sub-optimal skill mix; gaps in support from central functions; the drug preparation environment; and sub-optimal clinical communication. Conclusion: This study identified multiple system-level factors contributing to opioid errors in inpatient palliative care services. Any quality and safety initiatives targeting safe opioid delivery in specialist palliative care services needs to consider the full range of contributing factors, from individual to systems/latent factors, which promote error-causing conditions.

Clinicians' perceptions of medication errors with opioids in cancer and palliative care services: a priority setting report.

This paper reports the findings of a priority setting process, undertaken with cancer and palliative care clinicians, to better understand the characteristics of medication errors with opioids within their services. Participants representing six public hospitals in one Australian state took part in a series of priority setting workshops and, drawing on actual incidents occurring in their services, sought to identify where in the opioid medication process errors were most frequently occurring. Opioid error types and perceived contributing factors were explored, and strategies to reduce/prevent opioid errors were proposed. The priority setting process provided valuable insights into the types of opioid errors that occur in cancer and palliative care services and the complexity of addressing opioid errors from the clinician's perspective. The findings from this priority setting process will inform future targeted quality improvement initiatives to support safe opioid medication practices in cancer and palliative care services.

Exploring Factors Contributing to Medication Errors with Opioids in Australian Specialist Palliative Care Inpatient Services: A Multi-Incident Analysis.

Opioid errors have the potential to cause significant patient harm. These high-risk medications are used in high volumes in palliative care services to manage pain and other symptoms. Palliative patients are at greater risk of harm from opioid errors, as they are generally older and taking numerous medications to manage multiple comorbidities. Understanding factors contributing to opioid errors in inpatient palliative care services is a largely underexplored, yet, essential aspect of patient safety. To explore and identify the characteristics and associated contributing factors of reported opioid errors in palliative care inpatient services using a multi-incident analysis framework. A multi-incident analysis of opioid errors reported over three years in two Australian specialist palliative care inpatient services. A total of 78 opioid errors were reported. The majority (76%) of these errors occurred during opioid administration, primarily due to omitted dose (34%) and wrong dose (17%) errors. Eighty-five percent of reported errors reached the patient resulting in opioid underdose for over half (59%) of these patients. Over one-third (37%) of errors caused patient harm, which required clinical intervention. Error contributing factors included the following: noncompliance with policy; individual factors such as distraction; poor clinical communication systems; and workload. This multi-incident analysis has provided initial insights into factors contributing to opioid errors in palliative care inpatient services. Further exploration is warranted to understand palliative care clinicians' perspectives of systems, individual, and patient factors that influence safe opioid delivery processes.

Opioid errors in inpatient palliative care services: a retrospective review

Opioids are a high-risk medicine frequently used to manage palliative patients’ cancer-related pain and other symptoms. Despite the high volume of opioid use in inpatient palliative care services, and the...

Analgesic-Related Medication Errors Reported to US Poison Control Centers.

This study investigates the characteristics and trends of medication errors involving analgesic medications. A retrospective analysis was conducted of analgesic-related medication errors reported to the National Poison Data System (NPDS) from 2000 through 2012. From 2000 through 2012, the NPDS received 533,763 reports of analgesic-related medication errors, averaging 41,059 medication errors annually. Overall, the rate of analgesic-related medication errors reported to the NPDS increased significantly by 82.6% from 2000 to 2009, followed by a 5.7% nonsignificant decrease from 2009 to 2012. Among the analgesic categories, rates of both acetaminophen-related and opioid-related medication errors reported to the NPDS increased during 2000-2009, but the opioid error rate leveled off during 2009-2012, while the acetaminophen error rate decreased by 17.9%. Analgesic-related medication errors involved nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (37.0%), acetaminophen (35.5%), and opioids (23.2%). Children five years or younger accounted for 38.8% of analgesics-related medication errors. Most (90.2%) analgesic-related medication errors were managed on-site, rather than at a health care facility; 1.6% were admitted to a hospital, and 1.5% experienced serious medical outcomes, including 145 deaths. The most common type of medication error was inadvertently taking/given the medication twice (26.6%). Analgesic-related medication errors are common, and although most do not result in clinical consequences, they can have serious adverse outcomes. Initiatives associated with the decrease in acetaminophen-related medication errors among young children merit additional research and potential replication as a model combining government policy and multisectoral collaboration.

How did you know you got the right pill? Prescription opioid identification and measurement error in the abuse deterrent formulation era

Background Self-report of nonmedical prescription opioid use (NMPU) is a cornerstone of drug abuse surveillance, policymaking, and treatment service planning, but misclassification creates bias and may confuse or undermine NMPU estimates [1]. We detected old OxyContin (OC) abuse reports long after a reformulated version (OP) was released (August 2010). This study explored sources of possible NMPU misclassification and proposed solutions. Materials and methods A mixed-methods approach identified demographic, behavioral, and cognitive factors influencing endorsement of old formulations in: a) multivariable regression analyses of NMPU data from the ASI-MV surveillance program [2] examined predictors of endorsing old (vs. new) formulations during the post-reformulation period (n = 8032); b) prevalence estimates of OC availability from an online recreational drug user forum survey (fall 2013; n = 459); and c) semistructured interviews (n = 29) and cognitive interviews (n = 7) among residential and outpatient substance abuse treatment program clients reporting past 2-year use of OC/OP. A coding guide identified patterns and themes of misidentification in transcribed interviews.

Analgesic Medication Errors in North Carolina Nursing Homes

ABSTRACTThe objective of this study was to characterize analgesic medication errors and to evaluate their association with patient harm. The authors conducted a cross-sectional analysis of individual medication error incidents reported by North Carolina nursing homes to the Medication Error Quality Initiative (MEQI) during fiscal years 2010–2011. Bivariate associations between analgesic medication errors with patient factors, error-related factors, and impact on patients were tested with chi-square tests. A multivariate logistic regression model explored the relationship between type of analgesic medication errors and patient harm, controlling for patient- and error-related factors. A total of 32,176 individual medication error incidents were reported over a 2-year period in North Carolina nursing homes, 12.3% (n = 3949) of which were analgesic medication errors. Of these analgesic medication errors, opioid and nonopioid analgesics were involved in 3105 and 844 errors, respectively. Opioid errors were more likely to be wrong drug errors, wrong dose errors, and administration errors compared with nonopioid errors (P < .0001 for all comparisons). In the multivariate model, opioid errors were found to have higher odds of patient harm compared with nonopioid errors (odds ratio [OR] = 3, 95% confodence interval [CI]: 1.1–7.8). The authors conclude that opioid analgesics represent the majority of analgesic error reports, and these error reports reflect an increased likelihood of patient harm compared with nonopioid analgesics.

Opioid medication errors in pediatric practice: four years' experience of voluntary safety reporting.

Opioids are the most common source of drug error that leads to harm in pediatric hospitals. To undertake a comprehensive review of experience with voluntary safety reports describing pediatric opioid medication errors at The Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto, Ontario), and to characterize the specific opioids involved, severity and type of error described, hospital location and time of day that the error occurred. All medication-related safety reports submitted to an anonymous, voluntary electronic safety reporting database in a university-affiliated pediatric hospital during the first four years of its use were examined. A database of opioid error reports was created for further analysis. A total of 5,935 medication-related safety reports were collected, 507 of which described opioids. Morphine was the most frequently reported opioid, administration was the most frequently reported stage of the medication process (192 errors) and surgical wards were the location from which opioid error was most frequently reported (128 reports). Twenty-two reports described patient harm requiring urgent treatment and intervention. Errors with codeine or hydromorphone resulted in the most significant harm reported. A total of 162 reports described problems with inappropriate opioid disposal, missing opioids, or incorrect opioid counts and checks. Future opportunities for improvement in opioid safety should focus on morphine, opioid administration errors in general, the safe disposal of opioids in the hospital environment and the identification of pain as an adverse event.

Medication errors with opioids: Results from a national reporting system

Background: Errors may be more common and more likely to be harmful with opioids than with other medications, but little research has been conducted on these errors. Methods: The authors retrospectively analyzed MEDMARX®, an anonymous national medication error reporting database, and quantitatively described harmful opioid errors on inpatient units that did not involve devices such as patient-controlled analgesia. The authors compared patterns among opioids and qualitatively analyzed error descriptions to help explain the quantitative results. Results: The authors included 644 harmful errors from 222 facilities. Eighty-three percent caused only temporary harm; 60 percent were administration errors and 21 percent prescribing errors; and 23 percent caused underdosing and 52 percent overdosing. Morphine and hydromorphone had a significantly higher proportion of improper dose errors than other opioids (40 percent and 41 percent compared with 22 percent with meperidine). Hydromorphone errors were significantly more likely to be overdoses (78 percent vs 47 percent with other opioids). Omission errors were significantly more common with fentanyl patches (36 percent compared with 12 percent for other opioids). Wrong route errors were significantly more common with meperidine (given intravenously when prescribed as intramuscular, 34 percent vs 3 percent for morphine). Oxycodone errors were significantly more likely to be wrong drug errors (24 percent vs 11 percent for other opioids), often because of confusion between immediate- and sustained-release formulations. Conclusions: Reported opioid errors are usually associated with administration and prescribing and frequently cause uncontrolled pain as well as overdoses. These patterns of errors should be considered when using opioids and incorporated into pain guidelines, education, and quality improvement programs.

Medication errors with opioids: Results from a national reporting system

Errors may be more common and more likely to be harmful with opioids than with other medications, but little research has been conducted on these errors. The authors retrospectively analyzed MEDMARX, an anonymous national medication error reporting database, and quantitatively described harmful opioid errors on inpatient units that did not involve devices such as patient-controlled analgesia. The authors compared patterns among opioids and qualitatively analyzed error descriptions to help explain the quantitative results. The authors included 644 harmful errors from 222 facilities. Eighty-three percent caused only temporary harm; 60 percent were administration errors and 21 percent prescribing errors; and 23 percent caused underdosing and 52 percent overdosing. Morphine and hydromorphone had a significantly higher proportion of improper dose errors than other opioids (40 percent and 41 percent compared with 22 percent with meperidine). Hydromorp hone errors were significantly more likely to be overdoses (78 percent vs 47 percent with other opioids). Omission errors were significantly more common with fentanyl patches (36 percent compared with 12 percent for other opioids). Wrong route errors were significantly more common with meperidine (given intravenously when prescribed as intramuscular, 34 percent vs 3 percent for morphine). Oxycodone errors were significantly more likely to be wrong drug errors (24 percent vs. 11 percent for other opioids), often because of confusion between immediate- and sustained-release formulations. Reported opioid errors are usually associated with administration and prescribing and frequently cause uncontrolled pain as well as overdoses. These patterns of errors should be considered when using opioids and incorporated into pain guidelines, education, and quality improvement programs.

Opioid Medication Errors Common in Hospitals

Opioid Medication Errors Common in Hospitals

Opioid Medication Errors Common in Hospitals

Opioid Medication Errors Common in Hospitals