Opioid Agonist Treatment Research Articles

Experiences of serious depression and serious anxiety among individuals receiving injectable opioid agonist treatment (iOAT)

BackgroundThis study aims to provide evidence of factors that impact participant reported serious depression and serious anxiety among individuals receiving injectable opioid agonist treatment (iOAT). MethodsData from an 18-month longitudinal retrospective cohort of individuals receiving iOAT was utilized. The outcomes of serious depression and serious anxiety were ascertained via self-report in the European Addiction Severity Index. Two Generalized Linear Mixed Models were formulated using Penalized Quasi-Likelihood method. ResultsAnalyses included 131 participants. Average age was 49.04 years, 31 % self-identified as female, and 30 % self-identified as Indigenous. Adjusted analysis identified the importance of poorer physical health (AOR:1.06; 95 % CI: 1.03, 1.08), illicit opioid use (AOR: 1.03; 95 %CI: 1.01, 1.06), emotional abuse (AOR: 2.01; 95 % CI: 1.17, 3.44), and social isolation (AOR: 1.95; 95 % CI: 1.06, 3.58) with serious depression. Adjusted analysis of serious anxiety identified associations with age (AOR: 0.95; 95 % CI: 0.92, 0.98), illicit benzodiazepine use (AOR:1.31 95 % CI: 1.06, 1.61), poorer physical health (AOR: 1.05; 95 % CI: 1.03, 1.07), and social problems (AOR: 2.09; 95 % CI: 1.18, 3.71). LimitationsGeneralizability of study findings may be limited given the criteria used to enroll participants and to define depression and anxiety. ConclusionDepression and anxiety are highly prevalent among clients receiving iOAT. While both disorders share several factors, there are distinct characteristics associated with each outcome. These include poorer physical health, experiences of abuse, illicit substance use, and social problems. Understanding factors that influence depression and anxiety in iOAT can assist providers in supporting iOAT clients' mental health and developing individualized care plans.

“It feels like I’m coming to a friend’s house”: an interpretive descriptive study of an integrated care site offering iOAT (Dr. Peter Centre)

BackgroundInjectable opioid agonist treatment (iOAT) has proven to be a safe and effective treatment option for severe opioid use disorder (OUD). Yet, iOAT is often isolated from other health and social services. To align with a person-centered care approach, iOAT can be embedded in sites that combine systems and services that have been historically fragmented and that address multiple comorbidities (integrated care sites). The present study investigates the addition of iOAT at an integrated care in Vancouver, British Columbia. We aimed to capture what it means for service users and service providers to incorporate iOAT in an integrated care site and describe the processes by which the site keeps people engaged.MethodsWe conducted 22 interviews with 15 service users and 14 interviews with 13 service providers across two rounds of individual semi-structured interviews (Fall 2021, Summer 2022). The second interview round was precipitated by a service interruption in medication dispensation. Interview audio was recorded, transcribed, and then analysed in NVivo 1.6 following an interpretive description approach.ResultsThe emergent themes from the analysis are represented in two categories: (1) a holistic approach (client autonomy, de-medicalized care, supportive staff relationships, multiple opportunities for engagement, barriers to iOAT integration) and (2) a sense of place (physical location, social connection and community belonging, food).ConclusionIncorporating iOAT at an integrated care site revealed how iOAT delivery can be strengthened through its direct connection to a diverse, comprehensive network of health and social services that are provided in a community atmosphere with high quality therapeutic relationships.

Opioid Agonist Treatment Retention Among People Initiating Methadone and Buprenorphine Across Diverse Demographic and Geographic Subgroups in Ontario: A Population-based Retrospective Cohort Study

ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to compare time on treatment among individuals initiating buprenorphine/naloxone and methadone and understand how retention varies according to age, sex, and urban/rural residence. Methods: We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study among individuals aged 18 years and older, residing in Southern Ontario, Canada, who initiated buprenorphine/naloxone or methadone between October 2016 and December 2018 (N=15,724). We compared time on treatment across demographic and geographic subgroups. Our primary outcome was time to treatment discontinuation, defined as missing at least 14 consecutive days of opioid agonist therapy (OAT). Results: We identified 15,724 eligible individuals, among whom 7209 (45.8%) initiated buprenorphine/naloxone and 8515 (54.2%) initiated methadone. The median time to treatment discontinuation was significantly shorter among those initiating buprenorphine/naloxone rather than methadone (114 d, interquartile range:15–665 d vs. 263 d interquartile range: 32–1015 d, respectively, P<0.0001). Time on treatment increased with age in both OAT groups, with the exception of those aged 65 and older, where retention declined. Among methadone recipients, time on treatment was longer among rural relative to urban residents (372 vs. 255 d; P=0.0073), with no variation by sex. Conversely, females treated with buprenorphine/naloxone had significantly longer treatment retention than men (125 vs. 108 d; P=0.0372), with no variation by urban or rural residence. Conclusions: Treatment retention is lower among individuals treated with buprenorphine/naloxone relative to methadone. Moreover, retention varies between and within OAT groups by demographic variables and place of residence. Further research which aims to explain these differences is needed to optimize OAT treatment. Objectifs de l'étude: Comparer la durée du traitement chez les personnes qui commencent à prendre de la buprénorphine/naloxone et de la méthadone et comprendre comment la rétention varie en fonction de l'âge, du sexe et du lieu de résidence (urbain ou rural). Méthodes: Nous avons mené une étude de cohorte rétrospective basée sur la population parmi les personnes âgées de 18 ans et plus, résidant dans le sud de l’Ontario, au Canada, qui ont commencé à prendre de la buprénorphine/naloxone ou de la méthadone entre octobre 2016 et décembre 2018 (N=15 724). Nous avons comparé la durée du traitement entre les sous-groupes démographiques et géographiques. Notre résultat principal était le temps écoulé jusqu'à l’arrêt du traitement, défini comme l’absence d’au moins 14 jours consécutifs de traitement par agoniste opioïde (TAO). Résultats: Nous avons identifié 15 724 personnes éligibles, parmi lesquelles 7 209 (45,8%) ont commencé à prendre de la buprénorphine/naloxone et 8 515 (54,2%) de la méthadone. Le temps médian avant l’arrêt du traitement était significativement plus court chez les personnes ayant commencé la buprénorphine/naloxone plutôt que la méthadone (114 jours, intervalle interquartile [IQR] 15-665 jours contre 263 jours IQR 32-1 015 jours, respectivement, P<0.0001). La durée du traitement a augmenté avec l'âge dans les deux groupes de TAO, à l’exception des personnes âgées de 65 ans et plus, chez qui la rétention a diminué. Parmi les patients traités à la méthadone, la durée du traitement était plus longue dans les zones rurales que dans les zones urbaines (372 jours contre 255 jours; P=0.0073), sans variation selon le sexe. Inversement, les femmes traitées à la buprénorphine/naloxone avaient une durée de traitement significativement plus longue que les hommes (125 jours contre 108 jours ; P=0.0372), sans variation selon le lieu de résidence (urbain ou rural). Conclusion: La rétention du traitement est plus faible chez les personnes traitées à la buprénorphine/naloxone qu’avec la méthadone. De plus, la rétention varie entre et au sein des groupes TAO en fonction des variables démographiques et du lieu de résidence. Des recherches supplémentaires visant à expliquer ces différences sont nécessaires pour optimiser le traitement par TAO.

Trends in use of medicines for opioid agonist treatment in Australia, 2013–2022

BackgroundThere are limited longitudinal data on national patterns of opioid agonist treatment (OAT). This study describes 10-year trends in the sales of OAT medicines in Australia. MethodsA descriptive and time-series analysis of methadone, sublingual (SL) buprenorphine (+/−naloxone), and long-acting injectable (LAI) buprenorphine sold in Australia between 2013 and 2022 was performed. Total units sold were converted into an estimate of the number of clients that could be treated over a 28-day period with that amount of medicine (‘client-months’). ResultsBetween January 2013 and December 2022, the estimated number of client-months on: any OAT increased by 50 % to 53,501, methadone decreased (−8.5%), SL buprenorphine increased (+78%), and LAI buprenorphine increased substantially after September 2019. In January 2013, 78 % of OAT client-months received methadone. By December 2022, 48 % received methadone, 26 % SL buprenorphine, and 26 % LAI buprenorphine. Between 2013 to 2022, OAT client-months per capita were highest in the state of New South Wales. Over the study period, greater increases in OAT were observed in very remote areas (88%) compared to major cities (53%). The number of client-months in non-community pharmacy settings remained stable from 2013 to 2019/20, before increasing markedly. The introduction of LAI buprenorphine was associated with an immediate, sustained increase of 1,636 OAT client-months, and further increases of 190 OAT client-months each month. ConclusionPatterns of OAT have shifted over the last 10-years with buprenorphine (SL/LAI) now the most common OAT used in Australia. The introduction of LAI buprenorphine has expanded OAT access, particularly in non-community pharmacy settings, and in remote areas.

Excellent hepatitis C virus cure rates despite increasing complexity of people who use drugs: Integrated-Test-stage Treat study final outcomes.

Achieving hepatitic C virus (HCV) elimination requires linking people who use drugs (PWUD) into care. We report final direct-acting antivirals (DAAs)-based outcomes from the Integrated-Test-stage -Treat (ITTREAT) study. Project ITTREAT (2013-2021), based at an addiction centre, was a 'one-stop' service with innovative linkage to care strategies. Primary outcome was sustained virological response (SVR12) (intention to treat ITT) including whether individuals were recruited in first (period 1) versus last four (period 2 included the COVID-19 pandemic) years of the study. Number recruited were n = 765, mean age 40.9 ± 10.1 years, 78% males, history of current/past injecting drug use (IDU) and alcohol use being 77% and 90%, respectively. Prevalence of a positive HCV PCR was 84% with 19% having cirrhosis. Comparing those recruited in period 2 versus period 1, there was increasing prevalence of IDU, 90% versus 72% (p < .001); homelessness, 67% versus 50% (p < .001); psychiatric diagnosis, 84% versus 50% (p < .001); overdose history 71% versus 31% (p < .001), receiving opioid agonist treatment (OAT) 75% versus 52% (p < .001) and comorbidity 44% versus 25% (p < .001). Of those treated with DAAs (n = 272), ITT SVR rates were 86% (95% CI: 81%-90%), being similar in period 2 versus period 1. Predictors of non-SVR were receiving OAT (OR 0.33, 95% CI: 0.12-0.87, p = .025) and ≥80% adherence (OR 0.01, 95% CI: 0.003-0.041, p < .001). Reinfection rates period 2 versus period 1 (per 100 person-years) were 1.84 versus 1.70, respectively. In the treated cohort, mortality was 15%, being mostly drug-related. Despite increasing complexity of PWUD, high SVR12 rates are achievable with use of OAT and good adherence.

Opioid agonist treatment in transition: A cross-country comparison between Austria, Germany and Switzerland

Background and AimsOAT is a well developed and successful treatment strategy for opioid dependent patients in Europe. It has significantly contributed to the fight against the HIV and HCV pandemics, leading to an increased life expectancy in this population. Building on the OAT experiences in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland and their models of care, the objective of this study is to analyse experiences and changes in patient structures to identify necessary adaptations for the system of care. MethodsWe analysed national register-based data from patients receiving OAT during the period spanning from 2010 to 2020 in Austria, Germany (cases), and Switzerland. We examined and compared OAT policies and practice at national levels through a review of literature and publicly available policy documents. ResultsAcross these three countries, the life expectancy of OAT patients increased substantially. The mean age increased from 33.0 in 2010 to 39.1 in 2020 in Austria, from 35.6 years to 41.5 years in Germany (cases), and from 39.6 to 47.1 in Switzerland, respectively. In all three countries, the percentage of patients/cases aged 60 years and older increased more than tenfold between 2010 and 2020. ConclusionsIntegrated support models, reliable care structures, internationally comparable high treatment coverage, flexible prescribing practices, and a wide range of available OAT medications are successful strategies. The experiences in these countries indicate that it is possible to address the complex and chronic nature of opioid dependence and its concurrent mental and physical health challenges, resulting in an increasing life expectancy of OAT patients.

Characteristics, treatment patterns and retention with extended-release subcutaneous buprenorphine for opioid use disorder: A population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada

BackgroundUptake and retention for opioid agonist treatment (OAT) remains low. Novel extended-release formulations may improve OAT accessibility by reducing the frequency of healthcare visits. Our aim was to examine uptake, characteristics, treatment patterns and retention of individuals initiating extended-release subcutaneous buprenorphine (BUP-ER), a monthly injectable OAT. MethodsWe conducted a population-based cohort study among adults aged 18+ initiated on BUP-ER between February 3, 2020 and March 31, 2022 in Ontario, Canada. Using administrative health data, we defined continuous BUP-ER use based on repeat injections within a 56-day period and used Kaplan-Meier curves to estimate time on treatment. Among new BUP-ER recipients, we described individual and prescriber characteristics, healthcare utilization and treatment patterns. Results2366 individuals initiated BUP-ER. The median time to BUP-ER discontinuation was 183 days (interquartile range: 66–428 days) and 52.0% of individuals were co-prescribed buprenorphine/naloxone at least once throughout the period of BUP-ER receipt. Among individuals who initiated on a dose of 300mg BUP-ER and had three or more injections, 18.8% continued to receive only 300mg doses (N=276 of 1470). Furthermore, 28.6% of those whose dose was reduced to 100mg (N=341 of 1194) had a subsequent dose increase to 300mg. ConclusionsOn average, people initiating BUP-ER discontinue within the first 6 months of treatment. While BUP-ER is likely providing an important OAT option, the high occurrence of discontinuation, supplementation with buprenorphine/naloxone, and frequent dose increases suggest inadequacy of current dosing recommendations among a proportion of individuals.

Measuring the importance of different barriers to opioid agonist treatment using best-worst scaling in an Australian setting

ObjectiveOpioid agonist treatment (OAT) is an effective treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD), however several client barriers to OAT are reported. Client importance of these barriers using economic preference elicitation measures have not been identified. This paper determines the most important OAT barriers using best-worst scaling (BWS) and compares the results of BWS to Likert scale. MethodsCross-sectional self-completed survey with 191 opioid dependent clients who attended Australian needle and syringe sites. Participants were presented 15 Likert scale barriers and 15 BWS barrier scenarios. The BWS data was presented using count analysis, multinomial logit and mixed logit models. The ranking of barrier items was completed using three BWS methods and one Likert scale method, with share preference results (BWS) or mean scores (Likert) used to rank the 15 barriers. ResultsThe most important client barriers were ‘enjoy using opioids’, ‘lack of support services’ and ‘hard to access’. The four ranking methods produced different barrier rankings for the most important barriers, but similar results for the least important barriers. ConclusionPolicies around OAT as a harm reduction approach, increased support services and increased availability of OAT services would be beneficial in improving OAT uptake. Comparing BWS and Likert methods produced different highest ranked barriers, indicating the method used to identify preferences has significant implications on the type of intervention prioritised.

Supervised on-site dosing in injectable opioid agonist treatment-considering the patient perspective. Findings from a cross-sectional interview study in two German cities.

Injectable opioid agonist treatment (iOAT) is an effective option to support people living with opioid use disorder (OUD) who have not sufficiently benefitted from oral OAT. However, iOAT has been criticised based on theoretical and practical grounds for its dosing policies: Current regulations demand supervised, on-site application and require patients to frequently visit their treatment facility. The current study aims to investigate how patients experience on-site application and derive strategies to enhance the acceptability and effectiveness of iOAT-delivery. This article is based on semi-structured interviews with 27 individuals currently or previously in iOAT in two German outpatient iOAT-clinics. We undertook an inductive qualitative content analysis, which included blinded, independent coding and the analysis of individual cases. Comments regarding on-site application and daily visits to the clinic were grouped into positive and negative aspects, iOAT as the best alternative option, facilitators of daily visits, and suggestions for improvement. Positive aspects took the factors stability and social support in regard. Negative aspects ranged from general inconveniences to major impediments to individuals' daily lives and towards achieving psychosocial goals. Participants reported rigorous adherence to iOAT's treatment regime, often due to a perceived lack of alternative options. Meeting iOAT's demands was eased by the patients' coping-strategies and through facilitating measures implemented by iOAT-clinics. Despite acknowledgement of the potential detriments from easing regulations, take-home arrangements were frequently suggested by participants to improve iOAT. Being required to attend the clinic for supervised iOAT-application is not experienced uniformly. While clinics can support their patients to cope with strict regulations, alternative approaches to iOAT-application should be considered to accommodate patients' individual needs. Examples from other treatment modalities (e.g., remote supervision and delivery services) might aid to reconcile individualisation while providing adequate safety measures and improve iOAT in the long term.

The Impact of Injectable Opioid Agonist Treatment (iOAT) on Involvement in Criminalized Activities: A Secondary Analysis from a Clinical Trial in Vancouver, BC.

A significant portion of the economic consequences of untreated Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) relate to individuals' involvement in the criminal justice system. The present study uncovers if treatment with iOAT is related to the number of criminal charges amongst participants, what type of crime participants were involved in, and the frequency with which participants were victims of crime. This study contributes to the body of research on the effectiveness of iOAT reducing criminal involvement. This is a secondary analysis of police record data obtained from the Vancouver Police Department over a three-year period during the Study to Assess Longer-term Opioid Medication Effectiveness clinical trial. The data was obtained from participants (N = 192) enrolled in the trial through a release of information form. During the three-year period, most charges (45.6%) were property offences, and 25.5% of participants were victims of crime. Participants with no treatment prior to randomization into the SALOME trial were 2.61 (95% CI = 1.64-4.14) more likely to have been charged with a crime than during the iOAT state. IOAT can reduce individuals' involvement with the criminal justice system and is thus a crucial part of the continuum of care. Addiction should be conceptualized as a healthcare rather than criminal issue.

Aligning public health and public safety: Probation as a touchpoint to identify and link patients with opioid use disorder to opioid agonist treatment.

People in criminal justice settings (CJS) have high rates of opioid use disorder (OUD) and HIV. Probation is part of the CJS and congregates many individuals with high rates of mental health and substance use disorders relative to the general population; nevertheless, probation remains a major improvement to incarceration. As a steppingstone to full decarceration efforts, community supervision settings like probation can be leveraged as "touchpoints" to identify and link people with OUD (and other co-morbid conditions) to treatment and reduce criminal activity. To determine the feasibility of a modified screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment (SBIRT) strategy to link probationers to opioid agonist therapies (OAT) in the newly created probation system in Ukraine, we conducted a single-arm SBIRT intervention in eight probation centers in four Ukrainian administrative regions. For those screening positive for OUD, interest in OAT was assessed before and after a brief intervention. Those interested in OAT were referred to community OAT services. Participants with OUD also underwent HIV testing. Of the 1,298 consecutive individuals screened, 208 (16.0%) met criteria for opioid dependence. Of these, 122 (58.7%) enrolled in brief intervention, of which 54 (44.3%) had HIV and 14 (25.9%) of these were newly diagnosed. After the brief intervention, interest in starting OAT increased significantly from a median of 7.0 to 8.0 (P = <0.001) using a 10-point scale. Thirty (N = 30; 24.6%) of the enrolled participants initiated OAT and 21 of these (70%) were retained in treatment for 6 months. The prevalence of OUD (and HIV) is high among people in probation in Ukraine. SBIRT can identify a large number of people eligible for OAT, many of whom were willing to initiate and remain on OAT. Integrating SBIRT into probation can potentially assist with OAT scale-up and help address HIV prevention efforts.

Peer-led safer supply and opioid agonist treatment medication distribution: a case study from rural British Columbia

BackgroundBritish Columbia (BC) has been facing a public health emergency of overdose since 2016, with rural regions of the province facing the highest rates of death. Peers (in this case, people with lived experience of substance use) are known to be effective patient navigators in health systems and can play a role in connecting patients to care and reducing overdose risk.Case presentationWe outline a peer-led program focused on opioid agonist treatment and prescribed safe supply medication delivery that began in March 2020 at a clinic in rural BC. The peer takes an Indigenous harm reduction approach and is focused on meeting the needs of the whole person. The peer has regular contact with approximately 50 clients and navigates medication delivery and appointments for approximately 10–15 people each day. Clients have been retained on the medication, and experienced improvement in other outcomes, including securing housing, employment and managing acute and chronic health conditions. The peer has established contact with clients since March 2020 to support engagement with health care and continuity of medication access. This program highlights the importance and value of peer-led work and need for further investments in peer-led programs to respond to the unregulated drug poisoning crisis.ConclusionsThis peer-led intervention is a promising approach to engaging people who remain disconnected from health services in care in a rural community. This model could be adapted to other settings to support patient contact with the health system and medication access and continuity, with the ultimate goal of reducing overdose risk.

A qualitative assessment of tablet injectable opioid agonist therapy (TiOAT) in rural and smaller urban British Columbia, Canada: Motivations and initial impacts

BackgroundThe evolving and unpredictable unregulated drug market has driven an unprecedented overdose crisis that requires effective intervention. Growing evidence suggests that novel opioid agonist treatments, such as tablet injectable opioid agonist therapy (TiOAT), have potential to prevent overdoses and other drug-related harms. More evidence is needed to characterize their utility in achieving these outcomes. The current article is an analysis of two TiOAT programs implemented in British Columbia, Canada, to assess impact on health and well-being, including overdose risk. Moreover, we explored participants' enrollment goals and if they were achieved. MethodsThe study employed qualitative methods to evaluate the TiOAT program in two sites between October 2021 and April 2022. We developed a semi-structured interview tool to guide in depth interviews. All interviews (n = 32) took place on teleconference software or in person. Thematic analysis allowed for the emergence of themes associated with TiOAT participation. ResultsParticipants discussed various motivations for enrolling in TiOAT, which included gaining financial stability, reducing or eliminating drug use, addressing withdrawal symptoms, wanting to work, and improving social circumstances. An assessment of initial programmatic impacts revealed that many participant-identified motivators were achieved. Participants also reported fewer or no overdoses since starting TiOAT, and many reported switching from injecting to smoking drugs. Some challenges included adequate dosing as evidenced by ongoing withdrawal and pain. Some participants requested additional opioids, such as diacetylmorphine, to aid in reducing illicit drug use. ConclusionParticipants described how TiOAT helped them to achieve many of their goals. Suggested programmatic improvements include enhanced patient-provider co-design with respect to dosing to address ongoing withdrawal and pain. As the unpredictability the unregulated drug market worsens, novel options, such as TiOAT, ought to be implemented broadly to reduce overdose events and improve quality of life for people who use drugs.

Barriers and facilitators to the involvement of general practitioners in the prescription of buprenorphine

IntroductionFrance has one of the highest opioid agonist treatment (OAT) coverage rates in the world. French general practitioners (GPs) are providing the majority of prescriptions. However, a fall in the number of GPs initiating buprenorphine has been observed over the last decade. MethodsThe objective of this study was to explore the obstacles and facilitators to the involvement of GPs in the prescription of buprenorphine. A qualitative study comprising 14 individual interviews and a focus group bringing together 5 GPs was conducted among GPs based in France between June 2021 and March 2022. We performed data analysis using a grounded theory methodology. ResultsThe interviews showed a great diversity in the level of involvement of GPs, depending on their experience, their representations of patients with OUD, their mode of exercise, and their personal preferences. The negative representations of the patients associated with the feeling of physical and ethical endangerment, the feeling of powerlessness, the fear of a disruption of the practice and the feeling of incompetence appeared at the forefront of the difficulties stated. Conversely, the strengthening of initial training and the facilitation of access to self-training tools and multidisciplinarity, the consideration of opioid use disorder (OUD) as a chronic illness with the application of a patient-centered motivational approach, as well as the defining and respecting one's own limits when prescribing buprenorphine seem to be the keys to a balanced and fulfilling practice. ConclusionRaising awareness of the frequency of OUD appeared to be an additional lever to enhance the interest of the GPs concerned. Additional studies focusing on the evolution of professional practices would be necessary to extend these findings.

Reasons for not entering opioid agonist treatment: A survey among high-risk opioid users in Finland.

Aims: To characterise and understand the untreated high-risk opioid user population in Finland, and to determine the reasons why these people do not enter treatment. Methods: The study setting was a half-year cross-sectional survey in Finland during 2021-2022. An electronic questionnaire with 24 structured questions was concluded in 16 needle exchange units. Participants were opioid-dependent people without opioid agonist treatment (OAT), and they answered the survey voluntarily and anonymously. Results: Of the 167 respondents, 62% were men, 53% were aged ≤34 years, 66% had used opioids for >6 years, and 78% used drugs intravenously (IV) daily. The most used opioid (95%) was buprenorphine. Most respondents used opioids as self-medication for withdrawal symptoms (75%), or to treat psychological symptoms (59%) or pain (43%). Of them, 70% also used other substances for recreational purposes. The most common named reasons to stay outside OAT were as follows: seeking treatment is too difficult (37%); treatment is too binding (36%); and fear of actions from authorities (23%). Conclusions: For opioid-dependent respondents who would be eligible for OAT in Finland, treatment awareness is limited. These high-risk opioid users also think that the treatment would be too binding. In conclusion, there is a need for increase in general information about, accessibility to, acceptance for and individualisation of OAT.

Investigating hepatitis C screening among people receiving opioid agonist treatment: A retrospective audit study.

Estimates of the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) amongst people who inject drugs are in the range of 50%. Opioid Agonist Treatment (OAT) clinics have a large proportion of people who inject drugs. These clinics, therefore, present an excellent opportunity to identify and treat patients with HCV. Despite this, it remains unclear as to how well these clinics screen patients for HCV. This study aims to quantify the rate of HCV screening of patients that enrolled into treatment at an OAT clinic attached to a large teaching hospital in NSW. A retrospective audit of the electronic medical record of patients commencing OAT at the clinic was performed to determine the rate of HCV screening. During the audit period, there were 99 episodes of care that involved the commencement of OAT at the clinic, for patients who had a history of injecting drugs. Successful screening for HCV occurred in 56% (55/99) of these episodes. Of those screened, 26% were ribonucleic acid positive. Analysis of demographics did not reveal a statistically significant difference between those that were screened and those that were not. This study revealed a suboptimal rate of HCV screening at the OAT clinic. To improve the screening rate, the clinic could consider providing dried blood spot testing at the initial nurse assessment or having a clinician capable of venepuncture at the clinic.

Integrating long-acting injectable treatment to improve medication adherence among persons living with HIV and opioid use disorder: study protocol

BackgroundOral antiretroviral therapy (ART) has been effective at reducing mortality rates of people with HIV. However, despite its effectiveness, people who use drugs face barriers to maintaining ART adherence. Receipt of opioid agonist treatment, in the context of HIV care, is associated with medication adherence and decreased HIV viral loads. Recent pharmacological advancements have led to the development of novel long-acting, injectable, medications for both HIV (cabotegravir co-administered with rilpivirine) and OUD (extended-release buprenorphine). These therapies have the potential to dramatically improve adherence by eliminating the need for daily pill-taking. Despite the extensive evidence base supporting long-acting injectable medications for both HIV and OUD, and clinical guidelines supporting integrated care provision, currently little is known about how these medications may be optimally delivered to this population. This paper presents the study design for the development of a clinical protocol to guide the delivery of combined treatment for HIV and OUD using long-acting injectable medications.MethodsThe study aims are to: (1) develop a clinical protocol to guide the delivery of combined LAI for HIV and OUD by conducting in-depth interviews with prospective patients, clinical content experts, and other key stakeholders; and (2) conduct This single group, open pilot trial protocol to assess feasibility, acceptability, and safety among patients diagnosed with HIV and OUD. Throughout all phases of the study, information on patient-, provider-, and organizational-level variables will be collected to inform future implementation.DiscussionFindings from this study will inform the development of a future study to conduct a fully-powered Hybrid Type 1 Effectiveness-Implementation design.

Internalized Stigma and its Correlates Among Opioid Agonist Treatment Service Users in Nepal

Opioid use disorder is associated with high levels of stigma and discrimination, which impact treatment seeking and compliance. Despite extensive evidence as an optimal intervention for opioid use disorder, enrollment in Opioid Agonist Treatment (OAT) in settings like Nepal, is accompanied by moral judgements and stigma with a broad narrative of it being merely a replacement of ‘one addiction with another’. Stigma is eventually internalized by many service users impacting enrollment and maintenance in OAT, and quality of life. This study aimed to assess internalized stigma among OAT service users in Nepal and to explore its association with sociodemographic characteristics, lifetime mental disorders and quality of life. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 231 OAT service users, the survey instrument included the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview for DSM-5, Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness Inventory (ISMI) and the World Health Organization Quality of Life –BREF. Factors associated with quality of life and internalized stigma were investigated using bivariate and multivariate analyses. More than half (56.28%) of respondents reported having high internalized stigma with a mean ISMI score of 2.71 ± 0.64. All 29 ISMI items were found to have a mean score greater than 2.5 indicating a high burden of internalized stigma. Service users reporting higher internalized stigma had significantly lower quality of life across all domains, greater medical co-morbidity, lifetime anxiety and depressive disorder and alcohol use disorder. To lessen stigma and its impacts, our findings recommend a national initiative targeting stigma reduction interventions for existing OAT services and beneficiaries.

Effect of incarceration and opioid agonist treatment transitions on risk of hospitalisation with injection drug use-associated bacterial infections: A self-controlled case series in New South Wales, Australia

BackgroundTransitional times in opioid use, such as release from prison and discontinuation of opioid agonist treatment (OAT), are associated with health harms due to changing drug consumption practices and limited access to health and social supports. Using a self-controlled (within-person) study design, we aimed to understand if these transitions increase risks of injection drug use-associated bacterial infections. MethodsWe performed a self-controlled case series among a cohort of people with opioid use disorder (who had all previously accessed OAT) in New South Wales, Australia, 2001-2018. The outcome was hospitalisation with injecting-related bacterial infections. We divided participants’ observed days into time windows related to incarceration and OAT receipt. We compared hospitalization rates during focal (exposure) windows and referent (control) windows (i.e., 5-52 weeks continuously not incarcerated or continuously receiving OAT). We estimated adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRR) using conditional logistic regression, adjusted for time-varying confounders. ResultsThere were 7590 participants who experienced hospitalisation with injecting-related bacterial infections (35% female; median age 38 years; 78% hospitalised with skin and soft-tissue infections). Risk for injecting-related bacterial infections was elevated for two weeks following release from prison (aIRR 1.45; 95%CI 1.22–1.72). Risk was increased during two weeks before (aIRR 1.89; 95%CI 1.59–2.25) and after (aIRR 1.91; 95%CI 1.54–2.36) discontinuation of OAT, and during two weeks before (aIRR 3.63; 95%CI 3.13–4.22) and after (aIRR 2.52; 95%CI 2.09–3.04) OAT initiation. ConclusionRisk of injecting-related bacterial infections varies greatly within-individuals over time. Risk is raised immediately after prison release, and around initiation and discontinuation of OAT. Social contextual factors likely contribute to excess risks at transitions in incarceration and OAT exposure.

Prescription drugs with potential for misuse in Irish prisons: analysis of national prison prescribing trends, by gender and history of opioid use disorder, 2012 to 2020

BackgroundPharmacotherapy is essential for the delivery of an equivalent standard of care in prison. Prescribing can be challenging due to the complex health needs of prisoners and the risk of misuse of prescription drugs. This study examines prescribing trends for drugs with potential for misuse (opioids, benzodiazepines, Z-drugs, and gabapentinoids) in Irish prisons and whether trends vary by gender and history of opioid use disorder (OUD).MethodsA repeated cross-sectional study between 2012 and 2020 using electronic prescribing records from the Irish Prison Services, covering all prisons in the Republic of Ireland was carried out. Prescribing rates per 1,000 prison population were calculated. Negative binomial (presenting adjusted rate ratios (ARR) per year and 95% confidence intervals) and joinpoint regressions were used to estimate time trends adjusting for gender, and for gender specific analyses of prescribing trends over time by history of OUD.ResultsA total of 10,371 individuals were prescribed opioid agonist treatment (OAT), opioids, benzodiazepines, Z-drugs or gabapentinoids during study period. History of OUD was higher in women, with a median rate of 597 per 1,000 female prisoners, compared to 161 per 1,000 male prisoners. Prescribing time trends, adjusted for gender, showed prescribing rates decreased over time for prescription opioids (ARR 0.82, 95% CI 0.80–0.85), benzodiazepines (ARR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98–0.999), Z-drugs (ARR 0.90, 95% CI 0.88–0.92), but increased for gabapentinoids (ARR 1.07, 95% CI 1.05–1.08). However, prescribing rates declined for each drug class between 2019 and 2020. Women were significantly more likely to be prescribed benzodiazepines, Z-drugs and gabapentinoids relative to men. Gender-specific analyses found that men with OUD, relative to men without, were more likely to be prescribed benzodiazepines (ARR 1.49, 95% CI 1.41–1.58), Z-drugs (ARR 10.09, 95% CI 9.0-11.31), gabapentinoids (ARR 2.81, 95% CI 2.66–2.97). For women, history of OUD was associated with reduced gabapentinoid prescribing (ARR 0.33, 95% CI 0.28–0.39).ConclusionsWhile the observed reductions in prescription opioid, benzodiazepine and Z-drug prescribing is consistent with guidance for safe prescribing in prisons, the increase in gabapentinoid (primarily pregabalin) prescribing and the high level of prescribing to women is concerning. Our findings suggest targeted interventions may be needed to address prescribing in women, and men with a history of OUD.