Extubation In Operating Room Research Articles

A Retrospective Multicenter Study of Operating Room Extubation and Extubation Timing following Cardiac Surgery

BackgroundIn an effort to enhance recovery after cardiac surgery, intraoperative extubation has been targeted as possibly beneficial. This multi-center cohort study aimed to assess this by evaluating the outcomes of OR extubation versus extubation within six hours of intensive care unit arrival (early ICU extubation). Furthermore, we assessed time to ICU extubation and mortality and morbidity. MethodsPatients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery across 79 hospitals between 2011-2020 were included to 1) compare outcomes among OR extubation and early ICU extubation patients, and 2) assess time to overall ICU extubation and outcomes. ResultsThe overall study cohort comprised 163,982 patients, including 95,982 patients [ [ OR extubation : n= 2,529 (2.6%)and early ICU extubation : n= 93,453 (97.4%)] who underwent comparison of OR with early ICU extubation. Following overlap weighting, OR extubation patients had longer OR times (5.6 vs. 5.1 hours, p < 0.0001), and higher rates of reintubation (5.2% vs 2.9%, p=0.003), prolonged ventilation (3% vs 2%, p = 0.021), reoperation for bleeding (1.5% vs 0.7%, p < 0,01), pneumonia (1.9% vs. 1.1% , p < 0.006), and greater in-hospital mortality on multivariable regression (OR 1.34, p < 0.001). OR extubation patients at centers with low OR extubation rates (< 10%, N=60) had higher mortality (odds ratio 1.6, p = 0.001). Beyond 22 hours of postoperative ICU ventilation, the risk of morbidity and mortality increased significantly . ConclusionsFew cardiac surgery patients are extubated in the OR, which is associated with no clinical benefit and with increased morbidity. Cardiac surgery programs should reconsider OR extubation following cardiopulmonary bypass. Additionally, increased intubation time, in particular > 22 hours, is associated with an increase in adverse outcomes.

Efficacy and complications of endoscopic thoracoscopic versus laparoscopic radical esophagectomy in esophageal cancer treatment: A retrospective study.

To evaluate the efficacy and postoperative complications of endoscopic thoracoscopic and laparoscopic radical esophagectomy compared to open surgery in esophageal cancer treatment. This retrospective study included 103 esophageal cancer patients admitted from August 2018 to March 2022, divided into observation (endoscopic surgery) and control (open surgery) groups. We compared intraoperative parameters, postoperative outcomes, immune function, and one-year overall survival (OS). Intraoperative bleeding volume, the retention time of chest tube, postoperative fasting time, and hospital stay in the observation group were smaller than those in the control group (P < .05). The differences were not statistically significant (P > .05) when comparing operative time, the number of intraoperative blood transfusion cases, and the rate of operating room extubation in these 2 groups. The differences were not statistically significant when comparing the amount of resected lymph nodes and the positive rate of incisal edge in these 2 groups (P > .05). There was no statistically significant difference in the complication rates such as pneumonia, pleural effusion, pneumothorax, pulmonary embolism, anastomotic fistula, the leakage of thoracic duct, the injury of RLN and arrhythmia in these 2 groups (P > .05). At 7 days postoperatively, the CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ in the observation group and the control group were smaller than the preoperative ones in their same groups, and they were larger in the observation group than those in the control group (P < .05); There was no statistically significant difference on the CD8+ in the observation group and the control group at 7 days postoperatively compared with the preoperative ones in their same groups (P > .05). The 1-year postoperative OS rate was 81.63% (40/49) in the observation group and 72.22% (39/54) in the control group, and the difference was not statistically significant when comparing the OS rates of these 2 groups (P = .238, HR = 0.622, 95% CI = 0.279-1.385). Endoscopic thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy offers less invasive treatment with significant short-term benefits and better preservation of immune function in esophageal cancer patients, making it a safe and effective surgical option.

Safe Landing: Feasibility and Safety of Operating Room Extubation in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Valve Surgery

This study was designed to explore key safety outcomes after operating room (OR) extubation in minimally invasive cardiac valve surgery. Single-center retrospective chart review. Academic medical center in the United States. Patients undergoing valvular surgery via thoracotomy (November 2017-October 2022) at a single institution. The OR extubation protocol was implemented on August 20, 2020. Delirium rates, reintubation rates, and intubation duration were compared before and after OR extubation protocol implementation. Logistic regression identified patient perioperative characteristics associated with unsuccessful OR extubation. Among 312 patients, 254 were extubated in the intensive care unit (ICU) and 58 in the OR. Preoperative demographics were comparable except for the Charlson Comorbidity Index (median: 2.0 ICU extubation v 1.5 OR extubation). Interrupted time series analysis showed no change in postoperative delirium post-OR extubation implementation, with a trend toward decreasing delirium (risk ratio = 0.37, CI: 0.13-1.10, p = 0.07). The postimplementation era also had a lower median intubation duration (8 hours v 13 hours, p < 0.001) without increasing reintubation rates (1.7% v 7.9%, p = 0.159). Increased bypass length (odds ratio = 0.99, CI: 0.98-0.99, p < 0.001), intraoperative morphine milligram equivalents (odds ratio = 0.99, CI: 0.99-1.0, p = 0.009), and preoperative Charlson Comorbidity Index above 3 (odds ratio = 0.42, CI: 0.19-0.95, p = 0.037) were associated with decreased odds of OR extubation. OR extubation was not associated with increased postoperative delirium or reintubation rates but did decrease intubation duration. Successful OR extubation relies upon the consideration of various patient perioperative characteristics.

Operating Room Extubation for Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A National Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database Analysis

BackgroundThe utility of operating room extubation (ORE) after cardiac surgery over fast-track extubation (FTE) within 6 hours remains contested. We hypothesized ORE would be associated with equivalent rates of morbidity and mortality, relative to FTE. MethodsPatients undergoing nonemergent cardiac surgery were identified in The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database between July 2017 and December 2022. Only procedures with The Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk models were included. Risk-adjusted outcomes of ORE and FTE were compared by observed-to-expected ratios with 95% CIs aggregated over all procedure types, and ORE vs FTE adjusted odds ratios (ORs) specific to each procedure type using multivariable logistic regression. Analyzed outcomes were operative mortality, prolonged length of stay, composite reoperation for bleeding and reintubation, and composite morbidity and mortality. ResultsThe study population of 669,099 patients across 1069 hospitals included 36,298 ORE patients in 296 hospitals. Risk-adjusted analyses found that ORE was associated with statistically similar or better results across each of the 4 outcomes and procedure subtypes. Notably, rates of postoperative mortality were significantly lower in ORE patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.46-0.65), aortic valve replacement (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.24-0.77), and mitral valve replacement (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.26-0.89). ConclusionsExtubation in the OR was safe and effective in a selected patient population and may be associated with superior outcomes in coronary artery bypass, aortic valve replacement, and mitral valve replacement. These national data appear to confirm institutional experiences regarding the potential benefit of OR extubation. Further refinement of optimal populations may justify randomized investigation.

Extubation in operating room versus early extubation in ICU after open-heart surgery in patients with CHDs.

The "Fast track" protocol is an early extubation strategy to reduce ventilator-associated complications and induce early recovery after open-heart surgery. This study compared clinical outcomes between operating room extubation and ICU extubation after open-heart surgery in patients with CHD. We retrospectively reviewed 215 patients who underwent open-heart surgery for CHDs under the scheduled "Fast track" protocol between September 2016 and April 2022. The clinical endpoints were post-operative complications, including bleeding, respiratory and neurological complications, and hospital/ICU stays. The patients were divided into operating room extubation (group O, n = 124) and ICU extubation (group I, n=91) groups. The most frequently performed procedures were patch closures of the atrial septal (107/215, 49.8%) and ventricular septal (89/215, 41.4%) defects. There were no significant differences in major post-operative complications or ICU and hospital stay duration between the two groups; however, patients in group I showed longer mechanical ventilatory support (0.0 min vs. 59.0 min (interquartile range: 17.0-169.0), p < 0.001). Patients in Group O showed higher initial lactate levels (3.2 ± 1.7 mg/dL versus 2.5 ± 2.0 mg/dL, p = 0.007) and more frequently used additional sedatives and opioid analgesics (33.1% versus 19.8%, p = 0.031). Extubation in the operating room was not beneficial for patients during post-operative ICU or hospital stay. Early extubation in the ICU resulted in more stable hemodynamics in the immediate post-operative period and required less use of sedatives and analgesics.

Routine Extubation in the Operating Room After Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass

BackgroundThe benefits of fast-track extubation in the intensive care unit (ICU) after cardiac surgery are well established. Although extubation in the operating room (OR) is safe in carefully selected patients, widespread use of this strategy in cardiac surgery remains unproven. This study was designed to evaluate perioperative outcomes with OR vs ICU extubation in patients undergoing nonemergency, isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). MethodsThe Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) data for all single-center patients who underwent nonemergency isolated CABG over a 6-year interval were analyzed. Perioperative morbidity and mortality with ICU vs OR extubation were compared. ResultsBetween January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2022, 1397 patients underwent nonemergency, isolated CABG; 891 (63.8%) of these patients were extubated in the ICU, and 506 (36.2%) were extubated in the OR. Propensity matching resulted in 414 pairs. In the propensity-matched cohort, there were no differences between the 2 groups in incidence of reintubation, reoperation for bleeding, total operative time, stroke or transient ischemic attack, renal failure, or 30-day mortality. OR-extubated patients had shorter ICU hours (14 hours vs 20 hours; P < .0001), shorter postoperative hospital length of stay (3 days vs 5 days; P < .0001), a greater likelihood of being discharged directly to home (97.3% vs 89.9%; P < .0001), and a lower 30-day readmission rate (1.7% vs 4.1%; P = .04). ConclusionsRoutine extubation in the OR is a feasible and safe strategy for a broad spectrum of patients after nonemergency CABG, with no increase in perioperative morbidity or mortality. Wider adoption of routine OR extubation for nonemergency CABG is indicated.

Feasibility and safety of ultra-fast track anesthesia for totally thoracoscopic closure of ventricular septal defect: A randomized controlled trial

ObjectiveUltra-fast channel anesthesia (UFTA) can reduce the dosage of opioid narcotic drugs, allow for a rapid postoperative extubation and reduce the harmful stress response during perioperative period. However, there has been limited information about the application of UFTA during thoracoscopic closure of ventricular septal defect (VSD). The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of UFTA technique in patients undergoing totally thoracoscopic closure of VSD. MethodsSeventy-eight patients were randomly divided into study (UFTA) and control (standard general anesthesia) group. Totally thoracoscopic closure of VSD was performed in all patients. Extubation in the study and control group was attempted in the operating room and the intensive care unit, respectively. ResultsAll patients in the study group were extubated in the operating room immediately after surgery, but 2 (6.1%) required reintubation. All the control group patients were extubated after a period of mechanical ventilation (3.0 ± 3.7 h vs 0 h in the study group, p = 0.001) in the intensive care unit. The intensive care and hospital stays in the study group were shorter than in the control group (4.3 ± 2.5 vs 13.4 ± 4.4 h, p = 0.003, and 5.8 ± 0.8 vs 6.5 ± 1.2 d, p = 0.047). The total costs for the treatment in the study group was lower than in the control group (5264 ± 514 vs 4662 ± 461 US dollars, p = 0.02). ConclusionsUFTA and operating room extubation was feasible and safe in the majority of patients following totally thoracoscopic closure of VSD. This technique was associated with a shorter intensive care stay and lower overall costs for the surgical treatment.

Extubation in the operating room results in fewer composite mechanical ventilation-related adverse outcomes in patients after liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundTo investigate the effect of extubation in the operating room (OR) on mechanical ventilation-related adverse outcomes in patients who undergo liver transplantation.MethodsPatients who underwent liver transplantation between January 2016 and December 2019 were included. According to the timing of extubation, patients were divided into OR extubation group and intensive care unit (ICU) extubation group. The propensity score was used to match OR extubation group and ICU extubation group at a 1:2 ratio by demographical and clinical covariates. The primary outcome was a composite of mechanical ventilation-related adverse outcomes, including 30-day all-cause mortality, in-hospital acute kidney injury (stage 2 or 3), and in-hospital moderate to severe pulmonary complications. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital moderate to severe infectious complications, unplanned reintubation rates, ICU and postoperative hospital lengths of stay, and total hospital cost.ResultsA total of 438 patients were enrolled. After propensity score matching, 94 patients were in OR extubation group and 148 patients were in ICU extubation group. Incidence of the composite mechanical ventilation-related adverse outcomes was significantly lower in OR extubation group than ICU extubation group, even after adjusting for confounding factors (19.1% vs. 31.8%; Odds Ratio, 0.509; 95% Confidence Index [CI], 0.274-0.946; P=0.031). The duration of ICU stay was much shorter in OR extubation group than ICU extubation group (median 4, Interquartile range [IQR] (3 ~ 6) vs. median 6, IQR (4 ~ 8); P<0.001). Meanwhile, extubation in the OR led to a significant reduction of total hospital cost compared with extubation in the ICU (median 3.9, IQR (3.5 ~ 4.6) 10000 US dollars vs. median 4.1, IQR (3.8 ~ 5.1) 10000 US dollars; P=0.021). However, there were no statistically significant differences in moderate to severe infectious complications, unplanned reintubation rates, and the length of postoperative hospital stay between groups.ConclusionsAmong patients who underwent liver transplantation, extubation in the OR compared with extubation in the ICU, significantly reduced the primary composite outcome of 30-day all-cause mortality, in-hospital acute kidney injury (stage 2 or 3), or in-hospital moderate to severe pulmonary complications.Trial registrationThe trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov with registration number NCT04261816. Retrospectively registered on 1st February 2020.

Enhancing Recovery in Congenital Cardiac Surgery

BackgroundThe benefits of a comprehensive enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program for patients with congenital heart disease are largely unknown. This study evaluated adherence and to outcomes of a recently implemented enhanced recovery program (ERP) in congenital cardiac surgery. MethodsPatients undergoing elective procedures for simple and moderately complex congenital cardiac surgery have followed institutional ERP guidelines since October 2018. Adherence to guidelines over a 12-month period (P2) was compared with implementation data (P1, 5 months). The association of outcomes with continuous time was estimated using linear regression. ResultsAmong 559 patients (representing 40% of the cardiac surgical volume) following the ERP over a period of 17 months, no differences in patient characteristics were observed between periods, except a higher incidence of previous operations in P2. Adherence to many aspects of guidelines improved from P1 to P2. The following improvements were notable: operating room extubation, 27% in P2 vs16% in P1 (P = .006); and a decrease in median ventilation time, 6.0 hours (interquartile range [IQR], 0-9.2 hours) in P2 vs 7.6 hours (IQR, 3.8-12.3 hours) in P1 (P = .002). In addition, there was a reduction in opioids, reported as oral morphine equivalents, that was most significant for intraoperative oral morphine equivalents: 5.00 mg/kg (IQR, 3.11-7.60 mg/kg) in P2 vs 6.05 mg/kg (IQR, 3.77-9.78 mg/kg) in P1 (P = .001). There was no difference in overall intensive care unit and postoperative lengths of stay, except in lower-risk surgical procedures. Surgical outcomes were similar in the 2 periods. ConclusionsAn enhanced recovery program reduced the use of opioids, led to more extubation in the operating room, and reduced mechanical ventilation duration in patients undergoing congenital cardiac surgery.

The Impact of Extubation Setting on Operating Room Efficiency, Hospital Costs, and Patient Safety in a Children's Hospital

Introduction: Operating room (OR) throughput and efficiency is a key driver of hospital costs. We sought to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cost implications of a practice of post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) extubation for 4 common pediatric surgical operations. Methods: The records of 6,956 children who underwent inguinal hernia repair, laparoscopic appendectomy, pyloromyotomy, and tonsillectomy/adenoidectomy at a free-standing children’s hospital between July 2018 and June 2020 were reviewed. OR flow time metrics and postoperative airway interventions were assessed. Based on a 2014 study, 1 minute of operative time was assessed at $37. Exclusion criteria included PACU holds and direct transfers from the OR to an inpatient unit. Results: There were 5,245 procedures analyzed. All patients were extubated in the PACU except during periods of elevated COVID-19 transmission risk or when the PACU was understaffed. The mean time from procedure completion to leaving the OR was between 3.7 and 4.8 minutes for patients extubated in the PACU and 10.0 and 13.0 minutes for those extubated in the OR. PACU respiratory events were minor, infrequent, and of similar incidence after PACU or OR extubation. Conclusion: We found PACU extubation to be safe and effective in reducing patient time in the OR by up to 13 minutes. We project that our hospital has saved more than $1 million in 2 years due to the time savings associated with only these 4 common operations. In a time of limited resources, a policy of PACU extubation could have a substantial impact on the financial viability of children’s hospitals.

The impact of routine post-anesthesia care unit extubation for pediatric surgical patients on safety and operating room efficiency

PurposeMaximizing operating room (OR) efficiency is essential for hospital cost containment and effective patient throughput. Little data is available regarding the safety and efficacy of extubation of children in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) by a nurse rather than in the OR. We sought to evaluate the impact of a long-standing practice of PACU extubation upon airway complications and OR efficiency. MethodsThe records of 1930 children who underwent inguinal hernia repair, laparoscopic appendectomy or pyloromyotomy at a children's hospital between July, 2018 and June, 2020 were reviewed. Extubations were performed in the OR only when the PACU was inadequately staffed or during the early months of the Covid-19 pandemic. Cases in which there was a deep extubation, a PACU hold was in effect or a patient went directly to an inpatient unit from the OR were excluded. Intra- and post-operative time metrics were recorded and emergency airway interventions were assessed. Results1747 operations were evaluated. Time from the end of the procedure to leaving the OR ranged from 4.1 to 4.8 min when extubation was done in the PACU and was 6–9 min less than with OR extubation. (see table). There were 23 airway events (1.5% of all cases) after PACU extubation that necessitated only brief bag-mask ventilation. There were no cases of re-intubation. ConclusionsIn a large population of children undergoing diverse surgical procedures, post-anesthesia care unit extubation was safe and resulted in rapid transfer of patients from the operating room after completion of their operation. Time saved because of shorter operating room times reduces hospital costs and can allow for increased throughput. Extubation in the post-anesthesia care unit may not only be as safe as operating room extubation, but may result in fewer serious airway events as patients may be less likely to have their endotracheal tube removed prematurely. Level of evidenceTreatment Study, Level III

Fast-Tracking in Lung Transplantation: OR-Extubation

<h3>Purpose</h3> Fast-tracking in cardiac-thoracic surgery is highly challenging. It requires multimodal and transdisciplinary collaboration. Early postoperative extubation in the operating room (OR) is an aspect of this strategy1. The objective of the present study was to report our whole experience of immediate end-surgery extubation after lung transplantation. <h3>Methods</h3> The Ethical Board of the French Society for Anesthesia and Intensive Care approved this analysis of the prospectively Lung Transplant database. All consecutive patients undergoing double-lung transplantation from January 2012 to December 2018 were analyzed, except repeated transplantation during the study period, and transplantation under cardiopulmonary bypass. The cardio-respiratory weaning protocol has been previously published2 (Figure). The aims of the study were: to identify factors predicting immediate extubation, and to compare outcome among patients. <h3>Results</h3> Among the 410 patients included, 142 (34.6%) were extubated in the OR. Predictive factors for OR extubation are reported in Table 1. Postoperative outcomes are summarized in Table 2. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Immediate extubation via a fast-tracking protocol is feasible after lung transplantation. It forecasts a positive outcome. It requires transdisciplinary collaboration.

Operating room extubation: A predictive factor for 1-year survival after double-lung transplantation

Operating room (OR) extubation has been reported after lung transplantation (LT) in small cohorts. This study aimed to evaluate the prognosis of OR-extubated patients. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the safety of this approach and to identify its predictive factors. This retrospective single-center cohort study included patients undergoing double lung transplantation (DLT) from January 2012 to June 2019. Patients undergoing multiorgan transplantation, repeat transplantation, or cardiopulmonary bypass during the study period were excluded. OR-extubated patients were compared with intensive care unit (ICU)-extubated patients. Among the 450 patients included in the analysis, 161 (35.8%) were extubated in the OR, and 4 were reintubated within 24 hours. Predictive factors for OR extubation were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)/emphysema (p = .002) and cystic fibrosis (p = .005), recipient body mass index (p = .048), and the PaO2/FiO2 ratio 10 minutes after second graft implantation (p < .001). OR-extubated patients had a lower prevalence of grade 3 primary graft dysfunction at day 3 (p < .001). Eight (5.0%) patients died within the first year after OR extubation, and 49 (13.5%) patients died after ICU extubation (log-rank test; p = .005). After adjustment for OR extubation predictive factors, the multivariate Cox regression model showed that OR extubation was associated with greater one-year survival (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.40 [0.16-0.91], p = .028). OR extubation was associated with a favorable prognosis after DLT, but the association should not be interpreted as causality. This fast-track protocol was made possible by a team committed to developing a comprehensive strategy to enhance recovery.

The Benefits of early Extubation in OR and ICU after Cardiac Surgery

Objective: Operating room (OR) extubation after adult cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass CPB is rare. We examined the outcome, factors, and benefits of OR extubation.&#x0D; Methods: We operated on 60 patients in German Hospital Tirana, from January 2019 to September 2020, who had undergone CABG cardiac operations: 52 patients, mitral valve repair 5 patients, aortic stenosis 1patient, Bentall procedure 1 patient, left atrial myxoma 1 patient. The patient's age was from 46-82 years old, there were 24 female patients and 36 male patients, 24 diabetic patients, 36 non-diabetic patients, in all cases we did not apply epidural anesthesia.&#x0D; Anesthesia was used with low doses of fentanyl. in combination with propofol, sevoflurane. In all cases, neostigmine was used for decurarisation.&#x0D; The quality and depth of anesthesia were assessed with obvious signs such as tachycardia, hypertension, sweating. Endogenous stress was also assessed by monitoring glycemia during the intervention.&#x0D; As extubation criteria were assessed the patient's consciousness, respiratory mechanics, hemodynamic stability, diuresis, bleeding from drains.&#x0D; Results: 16 patients were extubated in the OR and 44 patients were extubated 15-20 minutes after the intervention in ICU. There was no reintubation. 2 patients were transferred immediately from OR to the pavilion. 35 patients were transferred to the pavilion 3-4 hours after extubation. 23 patients were transferred to the pavilion the next morning. Patients left the hospital after 5-7 days.&#x0D; Conclusions: Extubation in the OR in the early postoperative period has now become a routine in all specialized clinics. The time spent in the ICU is very low and the day spent in the ward was 5-7 days. The benefit is in the best and fastest activation of patients in the early postoperative period as well as in reduced intervention costs.

Extubation in the Operating Room After Transapical Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Safely Improves Time-Related Outcomes and Lowers Costs: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

The experience of safe extubation in the operating room (OR) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedure remains not well established. The authors conducted this study to assess the effect of OR extubation in comparison with extubation in the intensive care unit (ICU) on the outcomes and cost in patients undergoing transapical-TAVI. A propensity score-matched analysis. A single major urban teaching and university hospital. A total of 266 patients undergoing transapical TAVI under general anesthesia between June 2015 and March 2020. Propensity matching on pre- and intraoperative variables was used to identify 99 patients undergoing extubation in the OR versus 72 undergoing extubation in the ICU for outcome analysis. After matching, extubation in the OR showed significant reductions of length of stay (LOS) in ICU (38.8 ± 17.4 v 58.0 ± 70.0 h, difference -19.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] -35.7 to -2.7, p = 0.009) and postoperative LOS in hospital (7.1 ± 3.9 v 10.1 ± 4.6 d, difference -3.0, 95% CI -4.3 to -1.7, p < 0.0001) compared with ICU extubation, but did not significantly affect the composite incidence of any postoperative complications (46.5% [46 of 99] v 52.8% [38 of 72], difference -6.3%, 95% CI -21.5 to 8.9, p = 0.415). Also, extubation in the OR led to significant reduction of total hospital cost compared with extubation in the ICU (¥303.5 ± 17.3 v ¥329.9 ± 52.3 thousand, difference -26.2, 95% CI -38.8 to -13.7, p < 0.0001). The current study provided evidence that extubation in the OR could be performed safely without increases in morbidity, mortality, or reintubation rate and could provide cost-effective outcome benefits in patients undergoing transapical-TAVI.

Risk Factors for Delayed Extubation Following High Posterior Cervical and Occipital Fusion.

Much has been written on initial airway management in patients undergoing cervical spine procedures, but comparatively less is known about extubation criteria. High cervical and occipital fusion procedures pose a particular risk for extubation given the potential for a reduced range of motion at the occiput-C1 and C1-C2 joints should reintubation be necessary. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of posterior high cervical and occipital fusion cases to identify factors related to delayed extubation and postoperative airway and pulmonary complications. Using a convenience sample of all cases operated between January 2009 and April 2018, we reviewed anesthesia records and discharge summaries to compare patient characteristics, airway management, surgical factors, and postoperative complications between patients who underwent delayed extubation and those who did not. A total of 135 patients met our inclusion criteria. Overall, 92 (68.1%) patients were extubated in the operating room (OR), and 43 (31.9%) underwent delayed extubation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified age, procedure length, C2 as the highest level fused, and percentage colloid administered as predictors of delayed extubation. We did not find a difference in the rate of postoperative pulmonary complications between groups (6/92 [6.5%] for OR extubation; 2/43 [4.7%] for delayed extubation). Two patients had serious airway complications, and both were extubated in the OR (2/92, 2.2%). The decision to extubate immediately postoperatively after high cervical and occipital fusion should be considered carefully as the morbidity associated with airway obstruction can be severe in this population, while negative effects of delayed extubation were not evident in our analysis.

Analysis of pre- and intraoperative clinical factors for successful operating room extubation after living donor liver transplantation: a retrospective observational cohort study

BackgroundEarly extubation after liver transplantation is safe and accelerates patient recovery. Patients with end-stage liver disease undergo sarcopenic changes, and sarcopenia is associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality. We investigated the impact of core muscle mass on the feasibility of immediate extubation in the operating room (OR) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).MethodsA total of 295 male adult LDLT patients were retrospectively reviewed between January 2011 and December 2017. In total, 40 patients were excluded due to emergency surgery or severe encephalopathy. A total of 255 male LDLT patients were analyzed in this study. According to the OR extubation criteria, the study population was classified into immediate and conventional extubation groups (39.6 vs. 60.4%). Psoas muscle area was estimated using abdominal computed tomography and normalized by height squared (psoas muscle index [PMI]).ResultsThere were no significant differences in OR extubation rates among the five attending transplant anesthesiologists. The preoperative PMI correlated with respiratory performance. The preoperative PMI was higher in the immediate extubation group than in the conventional extubation group. Potentially significant perioperative factors in the univariate analysis were entered into a multivariate analysis, in which preoperative PMI and intraoperative factors (i.e., continuous renal replacement therapy, significant post-reperfusion syndrome, and fresh frozen plasma transfusion) were associated with OR extubation. The duration of ventilator support and length of intensive care unit stay were shorter in the immediate extubation group than in the conventional extubation group, and the incidence of pneumonia and early allograft dysfunction were also lower in the immediate extubation group.ConclusionsOur study could improve the accuracy of predictions concerning immediate post-transplant extubation in the OR by introducing preoperative PMI into predictive models for patients who underwent elective LDLT.

Can complex mitral valve repair be performed with robotics? An institution's experience utilizing a dedicated team approach in 500 patients†.

The full potential of robotics has not been achieved in terms of addressing the most challenging mitral valve (MV) cases. We outline our technique and report our early results with totally endoscopic robotic MV repair in a wide range of pathologies. From May 2011 to August 2017, a dedicated team attempted totally endoscopic robotic MV repair in 500 MV regurgitation patients. Repair complexity was scored in 3 categories. We analysed our sequential case experience by quartiles. Patient mean age was 60.8 years (range 18-88). Aetiologies included: degenerative 382 (76.4%), functional 37 (7.4%), inflammatory 22 (4.4%) and others 59 (11.8%). Mitral annular calcification was present in 64 (12.8%) cases. Simple MV repair (annuloplasty alone or with 1 leaflet segment repair) was performed in 240 (48%) patients, complex (repair involving more than 1 segment on the same leaflet) in 140 (28%) patients and most complex (bileaflet repair or mitral annular calcification excision with atrioventricular groove repair) in 120 (24%) patients. Concomitant procedures included: left appendage closure (94.8%), patent foramen ovale/atrial septal defect (PFO/ASD) closure (19.6%), cryoablation (19.4%), tricuspid repair (6.2%) or hybrid percutaneous coronary revascularization (7.8%). The overall repair rate was 99.4%, with 0.6% early mortality and 1.2% stroke rate (0.2% permanent neurological deficit). Case complexity increased with our experience. Despite an increase in aortic occlusion and perfusion times (median 86.5 and 125 min) and a slight decrease in operating room extubation rate (overall 64%), length of hospital stay (median 4 days) and 30-day readmission rate (overall 3.6%) were not affected by the progressive inclusion of more complex cases. Totally endoscopic robotic MV repair performed by a dedicated team allows one to address the entire spectrum of pathological complexity and provides consistent results.

OC76 THE MORE PROCEDURE (MININVASIVE, OPCAB, RAPID SURGICAL INTENSIVE CARE UNIT EXIT, EXTUBATION INTO THE OPERATING ROOM): OUR MININVASIVE APPROACH TO SURGICAL MYOCARDIAL REVASCULARIZATION

Abstract Background and Aim: To compete with PCI invasiveness, we adopted a composite surgical strategy which we called the MORE approach. Methods: Criteria for enrolment into the MORE study were haemodynamic stability and EF ≥ 45%. Criteria for operating room (OR) extubation were: normothermia, good cardiac output and no evidence of bleeding. From November 2016 to April 2018, 85 ACS patients underwent MORE technique: lower partial or a full sternotomy through a 10 cm skin Minincision; complete Off-pump revascularization; Rapid mobilization; Extubation into the OR. Results: Five patients failed OR extubation and 10 patients needed incision extension for poor coronary vessel exposure. We did not register any operative mortality, perioperative MI or CV events. Mean graft/patient ratio was 2.8. Early mobilization allowed 78 (92%) patients to be seated edge-of-bed after two hours. In the afternoon, 65 patients returned to the Coronary Intensive Care Unit. This rapid surgical intensive care unit (SICU) exit allowed 31 afternoon patients to be accommodated in the SICU bed, freed up by the morning cases. This offered economic benefits: taking up less ‘valuable bed space’ in the first operative day and increasing the number of the surgical procedures as a result of an improved SICU bed availability. Conclusions: MORE protocol allowed selected ACS OPCAB patients to be OR extubated, early mobilised and same-day discharged from the SICU. The minincision, avoiding excessive rib traction, reduced the postoperative pain and was a very well-accepted cosmetic bonus. The rapid SICU bed turnover allowed an overutilization of our present logistic facilities.

Effect of aminophylline on efficacy of extubation under ultra-fast track anesthesia in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease undergoing surgical correction of anomaly

Objective To evaluate the effect of aminophylline on the efficacy of extubation under ultra-fast track anesthesia (UFTA) in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) undergoing surgical correction of anomaly. Methods Ninety American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ pediatric patients, aged<6 yr, undergoing surgical correction of anomaly, were randomized into 3 groups (n=30 each)using a random number table method: group Ⅰ, group Ⅱ and group Ⅲ.After the end of surgery, normal saline was given in groupⅠ, 1 mg/kg aminophylline was given in groupⅡ, and 2 mg/kg aminophylline was given in group Ⅲ.The condition of extubation in the operating room and respiratory rate at extubation were recorded.Mean arterial pressure, heart rate and bispectral index value were recorded at the end of surgery, and at 9 and 15 min after administration. Results Compared with groupⅠ, the rate of successful extubation in the operating room, BIS value at 9 min after administration and respiratory rate at extubation were significantly increased inⅡand Ⅲ groups (P 0.05). Conclusion Aminophylline can increase the efficacy of extubation under UFTA in pediatric patients with CHD undergoing surgical correction of anomaly, and 1 mg is the recommended dose. Key words: Aminophylline; Heart defects, congenital; Anesthesia; Trachea