Open-wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Group Research Articles

Better clinical outcomes and return to sport rates with additional medial meniscus root tear repair in high tibial osteotomy for medial compartmental knee osteoarthritis.

This retrospective study aimed to investigate whether the repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) is effective for improving clinical outcomes and return to sports rates in young patients (50 years old or younger) with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and MMPRTs. Between 2016 and 2019, 153 patients with KOA and MMPRTs who underwent open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) were retrospectively included. The patients were divided into OWHTO combined with MMPRT repair (n = 73) and isolated OWHTO (n = 80) groups. Lysholm scores, Hospital for Special Surgery (HHS) scores, Tegner scores, flexion contracture, range of knee flexion, return to sports rates and postoperative complications were compared. Radiological outcomes, including hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), joint line convergence angle (JLCA) and Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grade, were compared between the two groups. After a mean follow-up of 30.1 ± 3.0 months, the OWHTO + Repair group observed better clinical outcomes compared with the OWHTO group (Lysholm score: 86.7 ± 7.4 vs. 81.6 ± 6.9, p = 0.023. HHS score: 85.4 ± 8.20 vs. 80.5 ± 7.1, p = 0.039). The OWHTO + Repair group had higher Tegner scores and return to sports rates than the OWHTO group (Tegner score: 6 vs. 5, p = 0.020; return to sports rates: 38% vs. 15%, p = 0.001). No fracture or major complications occurred. Radiological outcomes showed no significant differences between the two groups (HKA: 181.1 ± 2.7 vs. 180.1 ± 1.5 n.s; MPTA: 90.1 ± 1.8 vs. 89.2 ± 1.4, n.s; JLCA:1.9 ± 0.7 vs. 2.1 ± 0.7, n.s). Additional MMPRT repair during OWHTO was associated with better clinical outcomes and higher rates of return to sports in young patients with medial compartment KOA and MMPRTs. Level III.

Hybrid Closed Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Maintains the Leg Length After Surgery Compared With Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy.

This study aimed to assess the changes in leg length following open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) and hybrid closed wedge high tibial osteotomy (h-CWHTO) and whether the change in leg length was associated with preoperative radiographic factors and the change in planned opening or closing width. We retrospectively evaluated the data of patients who underwent OWHTO (n=57) and h-CWHTO (n=31) between 2016 and 2019. Standing full-length anteroposterior radiographs were obtained preoperatively and one year postoperatively. Changes in the lower leg and tibial length were measured using radiography, and the planned opening or closing width was decided via operative planning. Flexion contracture was examined preoperatively and one year postoperatively using a goniometer, and the correlation factors and changes in leg length were analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation. In the OWHTO group, the lower leg was significantly longer by a mean of 6.0±8.7 mm compared to that preoperatively (p<0.01); however, no significant difference was observed in the h-CWHTO group (mean, -0.56±11.6 mm) (p=0.788). In the OWHTO group, flexion contracture did not improve after surgery, however, in the h-CWHTO group, flexion contracture significantly improved from -7.1±7.0 degrees to -4.7±6.2 degrees postoperatively (p<0.01). No radiographic factors or bone opening or closing width were associated with changes in leg length in both groups. OWHTO led to a significant elongation of the lower leg while leg length was maintained post-h-CWHTO. However, the changes in leg length following both OWHTO and h-CWHTO were not predictable from preoperative radiographic factors or changes in bone width.

Economic evaluation of high tibial osteotomy: Closing wedge is more cost-effective than open wedge technique when analysing the KOOS-12 improvement.

The purpose of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of two techniques for performing a knee valgus osteotomy: opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (OW-HTO) vs closing wedge high tibial osteotomy (CW-HTO). In this economic evaluation study, a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of the Spanish public healthcare system was performed, comparing OW-HTO with CW-HTO. All patients with medial knee osteoarthritis who underwent one of these procedures between 2018 and 2020 in our institution were included. The cost analysis included operating room, implant, graft and hospital admission costs. Functional outcomes (KOOS-12, Tegner activity scale, pain and satisfaction) and radiological outcomes (hip-knee-ankle angle, medial proximal tibial angle, tibial slope and patellar height) were analysed. The cost-effectiveness ratio was obtained by calculating the cost of improving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of KOOS-12 for each procedure. All costs are expressed in 2020 euros. Fifty-one patients met the inclusion criteria (27 OW-HTO and 24 CW-HTO). Good to excellent functional outcomes, significant pain reduction (>6 points) and high patient satisfaction (>9/10) were observed in both groups. Both techniques yielded excellent radiological outcomes. N.s. differences in functional or radiological outcomes improvements between both procedures were found. However, the OW-HTO group presented a higher total cost than the CW-HTO group (4612.1 ± 765.6€ vs. 1827.1 ± 701.9€; p < 0.001). The cost-effectiveness ratio was 818.1 ± 46.8 €/MCID for the CW-HTO procedure and 2414.3 ± 115.2 €/MCID for the OW-HTO procedure (p = 0.025). The CW-HTO procedure presented a cost-effectiveness ratio almost three times lower than the OW-HTO procedure. Both techniques allowed to achieve of good to excellent functional outcomes, significant pain reduction and high patient satisfaction while correcting the varus limb malalignment and the metaphyseal tibial varus in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis. Level III; economic study.

Incidence and risk factors for lateral hinge fractures in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy and medial opening wedge distal tibial tuberosity osteotomy

BackgroundThe aims of this study were (1) to compare the incidence of lateral hinge fractures (LHFs) in medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) and medial opening-wedge distal tibial tuberosity osteotomy (DTO), and (2) to investigate the risk factors for LHFs. The incidence of LHFs was hypothesized to be higher in the DTO group than the OWHTO group. The DTO procedure is also a risk factor for LHFs. MethodsA total of 167 knees that underwent OWHTO (n = 65) and DTO (n = 102) were subjected to propensity score matching for the comparison of the groups. The matched variables were sex, preoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, and preoperative medial proximal tibial angle. Forty-one matched pairs were enrolled for comparative analysis. Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate risk factors for LHFs. ResultsThe incidence of LHFs was not significantly different between the groups (34.1% vs. 26.8%, respectively; p = 0.631). Logistic regression analysis showed that age (odds ratio: 1.074, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.020–1.131, p = 0.007), BMI (odds ratio: 1.150, 95% CI: 1.049–1.260, p = 0.003), and preoperative HKA angle (odds ratio: 1.150, 95% CI: 1.049–1.260, p = 0.035) were significant risk factors for LHFs. The difference in surgical technique between OWHTO and DTO was not a risk factor for LHFs (p = 0.204). ConclusionsThe incidence of LHFs is similar in DTOs and OWHTOs, and the DTO procedure is not a risk factor for LHFs.Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Retro-tubercular Biplanar Medial Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Results in Superior Patellofemoral Alignment Versus Supra-tubercular Osteotomy

To compare the changes in patellofemoral (PF) joint alignment, focusing on multiple planes, between two different types of biplanar medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO). Patients who underwent biplanar OWHTO between July 2017 and May 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. They were allocated to either the supra-tubercular (ST)- or retro-tubercular (RT)-OWHTO group. The following radiologic parameters were compared between the two groups: 1) weight-bearing line ratio (WBLR), 2) patellar height, 3) posterior tibial slope (PTS), 4) tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, 5) TT-TG angle, and 6) femoral shaft-patellar tendon (FS-PT) angle. Clinical outcomes and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) were also evaluated. In total, 104 knees that underwent ST-OWHTO and 105 knees that underwent RT-OWHTO were evaluated. The patellar height significantly decreased only after ST-OWHTO (P < .001). The TT-TG distance and FS-PT angle significantly increased, more after ST-OWHTO than RT-OWHTO (mean change value: 5.72 mm vs 1.91 mm; P < .001 for TT-TG distance; and 4.72° vs 1.80°; P < .001 for FS-PT angle). The TT-TG angle increased significantly after ST-OWHTO (mean change value: 7.62°; P < .001) but decreased after RT-OWHTO mean change value:-4.30°; P < .001). The PTS more increased after RT-OWHTO than after ST-OWHTO (mean change value: 0.91° vs 1.69°; P= .003). Clinical outcomes in both groups improved postoperatively, and no significant differences were observed between the groups. RT-OWHTO resulted in lesser changes in multiplane PF joint alignment than ST-OWHTO. However, no difference was observed in clinical outcomes between both groups, and PTS increased after RT-OWHTO. Therefore, these aspects of RT-OWHTO should also be considered. Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Proximal tibial osteotomy with absorbable spacer combined with fibular osteotomy has similar clinical outcomes to high tibial osteotomy in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

Proximal tibia osteotomy with absorbable spacer combined with fibular osteotomy (TPOASI) is an emerging surgical technique for treating knee osteoarthritis (KOA); however, the efficacy of this procedure remains unknown. We hypothesize that TPOASI can achieve similar clinical outcomes to opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OW-HTO). The objective of this study is to compare the clinical results between these two procedures. Patients who underwent TPOASI or OW-HTO from July 2016 to September 2020 were included. The following outcome parameters were determined before and after the surgery: the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the visual analogue scale of pain, the Intermittent and Persistent Osteoarthritis Pain Scale, femorotibial angle, and post-operative complications. In total, 209 cases were analyzed (102 in TPOASI group; 107 in OW-HTO group) with 3.1years average follow-up. Both procedures achieved significant improvement in KOOS (62.0 to 24.4 in the TPOASI and 62.8 to 26.2 in the OW-HTO group, p < 0.001) and WOMAC score (68.9 to 24.1 in the TPOASI versus 69.9 to 26.1 in the OW-HTO group, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in complications or femorotibial angle between the two groups but the only significant difference in the outcome parameters was the WOMAC stiffness score (19.6 in the TPOASI versus 26.5 in the OW-HTO group). TPOASI achieves comparable results to OW-HTO in terms of clinical scores, radiographic results, and complications, but has the advantage of avoiding internal fixation removal.

Effect of open-wedge high tibial osteotomy and lateral patellofemoral retinacular release on patellar position: an X-ray imaging-based comparative study.

Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) may cause adverse changes in the mechanical environment of the patellofemoral joint. For patients with lateral patellar compression syndrome or patellofemoral arthritis, intraoperative management is still challenging. The effect of lateral retinacular release (LRR) on patellofemoral joint mechanics after OWHTO remains unclear. Our study aimed to evaluate the effect of OWHTO and LRR on the patellar position based on lateral and axial radiographs of the knee joint. The study comprised 101 knees (OWHTO group) undergoing OWHTO alone and 30 knees (LRR group) undergoing OWHTO and concomitant LRR. The following radiological parameters were statistically analyzed preoperatively and postoperatively: femoral tibial angle (FTA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), weight-bearing line percentage (WBLP), Caton-Deschamps index (CDI), Insall-Salvati index (ISI), lateral patellar tilt angle (LPTA), and lateral patellar shift (LPS). The follow-up duration ranged from 6 to 38 months, with a mean of 13.51±6.84 months in the OWHTO group and 12.47±7.81 months in the LRR group. The Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grading system was used to evaluate changes in patellofemoral osteoarthritis (OA). Regarding the patellar height, preliminary analysis demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in the CDI and ISI in both groups (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in changes in CDI or ISI between the groups (P>0.05). In the OWHTO group, although there was a significant increase in the LPTA (P=0.033), the postoperative decrease in the LPS was not significant (P=0.981). In the LRR group, both the LPTA and LPS significantly decreased postoperatively (P=0.000). The mean changes in LPS were 0.03 mm in the OWHTO group and 1.44 mm in the LRR group, indicating a significant change in LPS (P=0.000). However, there was no significant difference in changes in LPTA between the groups, which was contrary to our expectations. Imaging showed no change in patellofemoral OA in the LRR group and progressive changes (from KL grade I to II) in patellofemoral OA in 2 (1.98%) patients in the OWHTO group. OWHTO can cause a significant decrease in patellar height and an increase in lateral tilt. LRR can significantly improve the lateral tilt and shift of the patella. The concomitant arthroscopic LRR should be considered for the treatment of patients with lateral patellar compression syndrome or patellofemoral arthritis.

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Double-Level Osteotomy Versus Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy for Bifocal Varus Deformity

In bifocal varus deformity, double-level osteotomy (DLO) is advocated to treat lower limb alignment to prevent an adverse increase in joint line obliquity. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological results after DLO and open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) in patients with combined varus deformity. It was hypothesized that DLO would improve clinical results without increasing the complication rate compared with OWHTO. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Inclusion criteria were medial tibiofemoral compartment pain, varus knee deformity with an abnormal medial proximal tibial angle <84° and a lateral distal femoral angle >90°, a functional anterior cruciate ligament, failure of nonoperative treatment, and a minimum 2-year follow-up with all clinical and radiological data. The rate of return to work or sports; the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS); the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score; and patient satisfaction were assessed at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Statistical comparison of the 2 groups was made using the chi-square or Student t test. A total of 69 consecutive patients were analyzed, of whom 38 underwent OWHTO and 31 underwent DLO surgery. A significant between-group difference was found for all radiological parameters; in particular, there was less joint line obliquity after DLO compared with OWHTO (1.7° vs 5.6°; P < .001). DLO provided better outcomes compared with OWHTO regarding the UCLA score (4.3 vs 6.7; P < .001) and patient satisfaction (2.6 vs 3.9; P < .001), but no significant difference in KOOS or return to work or sports was observed. The OWHTO group had more hinge fractures than the DLO group (34.2% vs 12.9%; P < .001). For combined tibial and femoral varus deformity, DLO produced more physiologic joint line obliquity with slightly improved UCLA and patient satisfaction scores. A greater incidence of hinge fracture was observed after isolated OWHTO compared with DLO due to a larger tibial correction; however, this had little effect on clinical results at the 2-year follow-up.

Distal tibial tubercle-high tibial osteotomy with assistance of modifiable spreader in the treatment of varus knee osteoarthritis: A retrospective observational study

As one of the knee preservation surgical approaches, good clinical outcomes of high tibial osteotomy were reported. Aims of this study were to analyze the clinical outcome and pre- and postoperative radiographical parameter and knee functional score between distal tibial tubercle high tibial osteotomy (DTTHTO) and open wedge- high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) in patients with varus knee osteoarthritis after more than 1 year following-up. A total of 194 consecutive patients in our joint center from March 2016 to October 2021 were enrolled, according to the surgical method, patients were divided into DDTHTO and OWHTO groups. Radiographic parameters of Kellgren-Lawrence grading, hip-knee-ankle angle, weight bearing line ratio and medial tibial plateau angle, knee functional score of American knee society (AKS) score, western Ontario and McMaster universities arthritis index (WOMAC) score, visual analogue score (VAS) were introduced to evaluate clinical outcome for patients who received DDTHTO and OWHTO. There were 103 knees and 89 knees in the OWHTO and DTTHTO group, respectively. Mean weight bearing line ratio for OWHTO and DTTHTO were 25.1 ± 11.7 and 25.2 ± 12.0% respectively, medial tibial plateau angle and hip-knee-ankle angle angle demonstrated that all patients in the present study inherited a varus angle ranges from 3.4° to 9.5°. Preoperative AKS, WOMAC and VAS were 68.4 ± 5.7 versus 69.0 ± 5.9, 109.3 ± 15.0 versus 107.7 ± 14.0 and 6.8 ± 1.0 versus 6.9 ± 0.8, and there was no significant difference between 2 groups (P > .05). Mean postoperative AKS and WOMAC score for patients in both OWHTO and DTTHTO group were significantly improved, moreover, postoperative VAS of DTTHTO patients was lower than that in OWHTO group (P < .05). When comparing the operation time, intraoperative blood loss and bone union time, DHHTO group shows a superiority in these variables over patients in OWHTO (121 ± 29.6 vs 145.7 ± 35.2 minutes, 115.0 ± 20.8 vs 103.3 ± 17.3 mL, 13.7 ± 4.1 vs 12.0 ± 2.8 weeks; P < .005) and incidence of complication was lower for DTTHTO group. DTTHTO in patients with varus knee osteoarthritis has good clinical outcomes, and it can achieve a better postoperative alignment. Operation time and surgical trauma were also less in patients who underwent DTTHTO.

Less risk of conversion to total knee arthroplasty without significant clinical and survivorship difference for opening-wedge high tibial osteotomies in varus knee deformities at 10-year minimum follow-up compared to closing-wedge high tibial osteotomies.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and survivorship at minimum 10-year follow-up of patients undergoing primary valgisation high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for medial osteoarthritis (OA), treated by Opening-Wedge HTO (OW-HTO) or Closing-Wedge HTO (CW-HTO). This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients presenting to a single institution undergoing HTO for isolated medial compartment OA. Two hundred and twenty three HTOs for isolated medial tibio-femoral OA were performed between January 2002 and December 2010. Patients were eligible if they had minimum 10-year follow-up and received either a CW or OW-HTO. Fifteen (6.7%) patients died and twenty-five (11.2%) were lost to follow-up. One hundred and eighty three (82.1%) patients were included in the final analysis and divided into two groups: OW-HTO (96/183; 52.4%) and CW-HTO (87/183; 47.6%). Range of motion, KSS, KOOS scores, and conversion to TKA rate were analyzed between groups. Both groups were comparable regarding age, arthrosis stage, gender, ASA score and BMI at the time of HTO. Survival analysis was conducted with re-intervention for TKA as the end point. At the time of HTO, mean age was 55years ± 7.9 (27-73.9) with 72.7% of patients being male. The mean follow-up was 13.3years ± 2.7 (10-19). Sixty-four (34.9%) patients underwent TKA at a mean delay of 9.3years ± 3 (3-16). The conversion to TKA rate was significantly higher in the CW-HTO group versus the OW-HTO group: 42.5% (37/87) versus 28.1% (27/96) (p = 0.04). The survival at 15-year follow-up was 59.2% in the OW-HTO group versus 54.6% in the CW-HTO group (n.s.). At 13-year follow-up, KSS Function score was significantly better in the OW-HTO (90.9 versus 82.4; p = 0.007). No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding the KOOS score, KSS Knee Score and complication rate. At mean follow-up of 13years, no significant clinical and survivorship difference was observed between the two groups. The conversion to TKA was significantly lower following OW-HTO. Minor correction was associated with risk of requiring subsequent TKA. Retrospective case series, IV.

Association of the joint line orientation angle of the contralateral limb with the alignment change of the unilateral and bilateral opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy.

This study aimed to evaluate and compare unilateral and bilateral open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) using mid-term serial assessment of clinical and radiological outcomes, especially focussing on coronal lower extremity alignment. Serial radiological assessments were performed in 40 patients (80 knees) with bilateral OWHTO and 49 patients (49 knees) with unilateral OWHTO. Both groups were further divided into four subgroups to compare each limb (unilateral involved and non-involved limbs and bilateral primarily and secondarily treated limbs). Radiological and clinical outcomes were evaluated and compared among the four groups. For the alignment change assessment, the pelvic tilt angle (PTA), weight-bearing line ratio (WBLR), joint line orientation angle (JLOA), medial proximal tibia angle (MPTA), joint line convergence angle (JLCA), distal tibia articular angle (DTAA), and talar inclination (TI) were measured pre- and postoperatively at 3, 6, and 12months and annually thereafter. Student's t-test, one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance, and correlation analysis were used to compare the groups. Patients in the unilateral and bilateral OWHTO groups had similar postoperative radiological and clinical outcomes. Each unilaterally involved limb and primarily treated bilaterally involved limb were negatively affected by the contralateral limb with respect to increased JLOA during the postoperative period (unilateral OWHTO group: r = -0.350, p = 0.023; bilateral OWHTO group: r = -0.520, p = 0.005). The correction change of the ankle parameters in the secondarily treated limb showed greater varus alignment than the primarily treated limb after bilateral OWHTO (DTAA (0.1±3.0 vs. -0.5 ± 3.8°, p = 0.014) and TI (0.9±3.2° vs. -0.3 ± 2.9, p = 0.001)). Unilateral and bilateral OWHTOs shared similar postoperative radiological and clinical outcomes. Alignment changes of the unilateral OWHTO and the primarily treated limb of the bilateral OWHTO were associated with the JLOA of the contralateral limb. Cohort study; Level III.

Can double-level osteotomy prevent patellofemoral osteoarthritis progression compared with open wedge high tibial osteotomy?

To compare radiographic, clinical, and arthroscopic findings in patellofemoral (PF) osteoarthritis (OA) between open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) and double-level osteotomy (DLO) with the same operative indication. After adjustment for patient age, and coronal alignment, 36 knees with OWHTO alone and 36 knees with DLO were compared. Radiographic, clinical, and arthroscopic findings were documented before osteotomy. Arthroscopic findings were observed 1year after osteotomy, and clinical and radiographic findings were observed 2years after osteotomy. Patellar height was evaluated using the Insall-Salvati (IS) ratio, Carton-Deschamps (CD) index, and Blackburne-Peel (BP) index. Lateral patellar tilt and patellar shift were measured. A power analysis was performed. The postoperative CD and BP indices in the OWHTO group were lower than those in the DLO group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). The CD and BP indices in both groups significantly decreased postoperatively (all p < 0.001). Tilting angles in the OWHTO and DLO groups significantly decreased postoperatively (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). There were no significant differences in American Knee Society scores, Kujala score, and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores between both groups. The PF OA progression of the trochlear in the OWHTO group was higher than that in the DLO group (p = 0.002), and the PF OA progression of the patellar facet in the DLO group and anterior femoral condyle in both groups on the lateral side were higher than those on the medial side (p = 0.006, 0.032, and 0.041, respectively). DLO decreased the rate of low patellar height compared with OWHTO. DLO decreased the rate of PF OA progression in the trochlea compared with OWHTO. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes in both groups. Level III, case-control study.

Salvage of severe knee osteoarthritis: efficacy of tibial condylar valgus osteotomy versus open wedge high tibial osteotomy

IntroductionTo compare the clinical outcomes and the radiographic features between tibial condylar valgus osteotomy (TCVO) and open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO). New insight into the indication criteria for TCVO was also clarified for achieving satisfactory results.Materials and methodsSixty-three knees with medial-compartment osteoarthritis were retrospectively studied. Thirty-four knees with subluxated lateral joint and depression of the medial tibial plateau underwent TCVO and the rest underwent OWHTO. Among the 63 knees included, 27 knees with a pre-operative femorotibial angle (FTA) ≥ 185° were defined as severe varus (subgroup S, 15 in STCVO group and 12 in SHTO group). Lower limb alignment, intra-, and extra-articular congruency were evaluated according to the radiograph obtained before and 24 months after surgery. The visual analog scale (VAS) score and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score were obtained to assess the clinical results. Opening angle and distance of the opening gap in each group were measured by intra-operative fluoroscopy.ResultsDuring the 2-year follow-up period, the mean HSS score increased from 70.3 to 81.4 in HTO group and 65.9 to 87.3 in TCVO group (p < 0.05). The mean VAS score decreased from 5.9 to 2.6 and 6.0 to 2.1, respectively (p < 0.01). Pre-operative FTA was restored to 172.9° in HTO group and 171.3° in TCVO group, and percentage of mechanical axis (%MA) was improved to 59.7% and 61.2%, respectively. Joint line convergence angle (JLCA) was slightly restored and medial tibial plateau depression (MTPD) was relatively the same before and after OWHTO, while these parameters improved greatly (from 6.4° to 1.2° and − 8.0° to 5.9°, p < 0.01) in TCVO group. More undercorrected knees were observed in SHTO group than STCVO group (58.3% and 13.3%, p < 0.05). Opening angle and distance of the opening gap were larger in TCVO group (19.1° and 14.0 mm) than those in OWHTO group (9.3° and 10.1 mm, p < 0.05).ConclusionCompared to OWHTO, TCVO had priority in treating advanced knee OA with intra-articular deformity. However, TCVO had a limited capacity to correct the varus angle. Besides, TCVO might be suitable for medial-compartment OA with a pre-operative FTA ≥ 185°.

Joint line obliquity was maintained after double-level osteotomy, but was increased after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy.

To compare the radiographic, clinical, and arthroscopic outcomes of varus osteoarthritic knees treated with an open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) alone or with a double-level osteotomy (DLO). It was hypothesized that treatment with DLO would maintain the joint line obliquity (JLO) and acquire better arthroscopic and clinical outcomes after surgery than OWHTO alone. Knees with predicted medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) > 95° were treated with OWHTO alone or with DLO. Preoperatively, age, body mass index, and hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) differed between the two groups. Therefore, after adjustment for those factors, 34 knees with OWHTO alone and 34 knees with DLO were compared. On whole-leg radiographs for a single leg, HKA, weightbearing line (WBL) ratio, lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), MPTA, and JLO were measured before and 2years after surgery. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by the Knee Society Score (KSS) knee, KSS function, Lysholm, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) scores before and 2years after surgery. Arthroscopic findings were obtained before and 1year after surgery. Various factors were compared between the two groups. JLO increased significantly from 1.4° to 6.3° in the OWHTO group (p < 0.001) and changed from 1.0° to 1.3° in the DLO group (n.s.). Postoperative MPTA and JLO in the OWHTO group were significantly higher than those in the DLO group (both p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the KSS knee, KSS function, and KOOS scores between the two groups. Postoperative Lysholm score in the DLO group was higher than that in the OWHTO group (p < 0.025). Femoral and tibial cartilage regeneration in the medial condyles and deterioration in the lateral condyles did not differ between the two groups on second-look arthroscopy. JLO was not significantly changed after surgery in the DLO group. DLO enabled the acquisition of physiological JLO compared with OWHTO alone. Retrospective comparative study, Level III.

Patellofemoral Cartilage Degeneration After Closed- and Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy With Large Alignment Correction

Background: Previous studies have reported patellofemoral cartilage degeneration and analyzed the factors affecting degeneration after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO). However, no studies have evaluated patellofemoral cartilage degeneration or examined the factors affecting degeneration after closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy (CWHTO). Purpose: To investigate and compare patellofemoral cartilage degeneration after CWHTO and OWHTO via arthroscopic evaluation and to analyze the factors affecting the degeneration. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 54 CWHTOs and 50 OWHTOs were performed with first-look arthroscopy between 2013 and 2017 at one institution. Hardware removal and second-look arthroscopy were performed, on average, 30.2 months after CWHTO and 26.8 months after OWHTO (P = .178). Patient characteristics did not differ significantly between the groups. Radiographically, the mechanical axis, posterior tibial slope, and modified Blackburne-Peel ratio were evaluated. Arthroscopically, the percentage of patient with patellofemoral cartilage degeneration was evaluated according to the International Cartilage Repair Society grading system. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the factors affecting patellofemoral cartilage degeneration in terms of demographics and the change of mechanical axis (correction angle), tibial posterior slope angle, and modified Blackburne-Peel ratio. The Anterior Knee Pain Scale was used for clinical comparison between the patellofemoral degenerative and nondegenerative groups. Results: No significant differences were observed in pre- and postoperative radiographic results between the CWHTO and OWHTO groups, except that the postoperative modified Blackburne-Peel ratio was significantly smaller among the OWHTOs. The percentage of patients with patellofemoral cartilage degeneration were 29.6% in the CWHTO group and 44% in the OWHTO group (P = .156) at second-look arthroscopy. The correction angle was the only significant factor affecting cartilage degeneration in the CWHTO group (odds ratio, 2.324; P = .013; cutoff value, 9.6°) and the OWHTO group (odds ratio, 1.440; P = .041; cutoff value, 10.1°). The postoperative Anterior Knee Pain Scale score was significantly lower in the patellofemoral degenerative group as compared with the nondegenerative group among the OWHTO group (81.6 vs 76.4; P = .039); among the CWHTO group, there was a lower tendency in the degenerative group, but this was without significance (81.1 vs 79.6; P = .367). Conclusion: Patellofemoral cartilage degeneration progressed after CWHTO and OWHTO with large alignment correction. High tibial osteotomy should be selected with careful consideration of the osteoarthritic status of the patellofemoral joint and required correction angle, regardless of applying a closed- or open-wedge technique.

Outcome after treatment of osteoarthritis with open-wedge high-tibial osteotomy with a plate: 2-year results of a Japanese cohort study.

This prospective multicenter study evaluated patient reported outcomes (PROs) in individuals undergoing medial open-wedge high-tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) with plate stabilization compared to conservative care or no treatment. One hundred eighteen of 148 patients older than 40 years were elected for OWHTO with plate treatment. Thirty patients declined surgery and were followed as a conservative group. The primary outcome measure was the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at 2 years. Secondary measures included Oxford knee score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index, range of motion (ROM), joint space width (JSW), femorotibial angle (FTA), and weight-bearing line ratio (WBLR). Patient enrollment and baseline characteristics were heterogeneously distributed and led to group characteristics that were not comparable. Therefore, the comparison of the KOOS between the groups showing no differences must be treated with caution. In the OWHTO plate group, all PROs and the ROM significantly improved between baseline and 2-year follow-up. JSW remained stable in the OWHTO group. The FTA and WBLR significantly changed from a mean of 179.3 (95% confidence interval (CI): 178.7, 179.9) to 169.8 (95% CI: 169.2, 170.5) and from 23.1 (95% CI: 20.7, 25.5) to 62.4 (95% CI 59.0, 65.8), respectively. Treatment failure with conversion to total knee arthroplasty occurred in 1% of the OWHTO group; and in the conservative group, 10% converted to HTO or knee arthroplasty. OWHTO with plate leads to significant improvement of PROs and function 2 years after intervention and demonstrates reliable mechanical axis correction with subsequent shift of weight-bearing.

Tibial rotational alignment after opening-wedge and closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy.

ABSTRACTA lot of good outcomes have been reported after opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) and closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy (CWHTO).The purpose of this study was to examine the rotational alignment after OWHTO and CWHTO performed by the same surgeon in one hospital.The sample included 30 knees from 24 patients. In all cases, the same orthopaedic surgeon performed the osteotomy surgeries using the same method. The tibial external rotation angle (TERA) was measured using the CT images of proximal tibial plateau and distal tibial malleolus from the consecutive axial CT slices of tibia. In this study, two considerations were examined. The first was the change in rotation angle, which was defined by TERA noted before and after the operation. The second was the relationship between the correction angle of the osteotomy and the rotation angle change of the distal tibia. The first was evaluated using the paired-Student’s t-test, while the second was analyzed with Pearson’s correlation coefficient. In the OWHTO group, the mean TERA was 21.4± 7.0° preoperatively and 20.2 ± 8.0° postoperatively, but no significant difference was seen between pre- and post-operation measurements (p = 0.21). Significant TERA increasing (that is, external rotation of the distal tibia) was seen postoperatively in only three knees. In the CWHTO group, the mean TERA was 19.9 ± 10.5° preoperatively and 16.5 ± 9.5° postoperatively, and significant difference was seen between pre- and post-operative TERA (p < 0.05). No significant correlation was seen between the correction angle and the change of the rotation angle in either group (r = 0.40, r = 0.12) .In the OWHTO group, both internal and external rotation of the distal tibia can occur after surgery. In the CWHTO group, the distal tibia rotated internally postoperatively. No significant correlation was seen between the correction angle and the change in the rotation angle in either group

Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy and unicomartmental knee arthroplasty in treating medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee: a Meta analysis

To systematic evaluate the outcome of open-wedge high tibial osteotomy(OWHTO) and unicomartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in treating medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. According to the retrieval strategy made by the Cochrane collaboration, a computer-base research of Medline, Pubmed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, and Wanfang databases was performed and search deadline was March 2018. Related Chinese and English orthopedic journals and conference papers were manually searched. Controlled studies of OWHTO and UKA in the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis were included. The quality of included researches was evaluated, and the data of postoperative knee function, complications, total knee arthroplasty(TKA) revision rates, and postoperative pain were extracted. Meta analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.0 software. A total of 8 articles that met the criteria were included containing a total of 675 patients. Meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in postoperative HSS score, knee score, functional score, and Lysholm score between the OWHTO and UKA groups(P=0.32, P=0.87, P=0.22, P=0.53). The range of joint motion in the OWHTO group was better than that in the UKA group, and the difference was statistically significant(P=0.009). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications and the rates of revision to TKA between the two groups(P=0.81, P=0.23). There was no difference in postoperative knee pain between the two groups. In the treatment of medial compartmental osteoarthritis of the knee that meets the surgical indications, OWHTO had better postoperative joint mobility. The results were similar in postoperative knee score, postoperative complications, and postoperative TKA revision rates between OWHTO and UKA groups.

Comparison of torsional changes in the tibia following a lateral closed or medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy

ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to evaluate, by computed tomography (CT), whether different torsional changes occur in the tibia following a lateral closed wedge high tibial osteotomy (CWHTO) versus a medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) procedure. It was hypothesized that the distal fragment of the tibia would show greater internal rotation after CWHTO. MethodsThirty knees from 25 patients who underwent HTO were enrolled. Fifteen knees of 14 patients who underwent CWHTO and 15 knees of 11 patients who received OWHTO were match-paired. CT scans were taken before and three weeks after surgery. Rotational changes in the distal fragment of the tibia were assessed by measuring the tibial torsion angle (TTA). ResultsThe mean TTA in the CWHTO group pre-operatively and postoperatively was +23.9° ± 7.8° and + 18.2° ± 7.0°, respectively. Internal rotation of the distal fragment of the tibia after CWHTO was −5.7 ± 3.3° (P < 0.001). In the OWHTO group, the mean TTA pre-operatively and postoperatively was +27.9° ± 6.9° and + 26.8 ± 7.7°, respectively, with no significant change in torsion observed (P > 0.05). ConclusionsThe distal fragment of the tibia rotated internally after CWHTO but not after OWHTO. Level of evidenceLevel III: case–control study.

Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: no difference in progression of patellofemoral joint arthritis.

The purpose of this retrospective comparative study was to evaluate and compare, radiographically and clinically, progression of osteoarthritis (OA) in the patellofemoral (PF) compartment after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO), and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) over a minimum follow-up of 5years. In this study, 42 knees in an OWHTO group were compared with 59 knees in a UKA group in terms of radiographic parameters, such as the grading system for OA progression in the PF compartment, and clinical parameters, such as the PF pain and function scores over a minimum follow-up of 5years. There was no significant difference of OA progression in the PF compartment between the two groups on knee radiography. Compared with the preoperative grades, the UKA group showed significant progression of OA in the medial PF compartment at the final follow-up, whereas the medial PF compartment showed significant stepwise progression by only one grade when compared to the OWHTO group. The PF pain and function scores showed no statistical differences between the two groups at the final follow-up, regardless of OA progression. There was no significant difference between OWHTO and UKA in terms of progression of OA in the PF compartment or deterioration of PF function score over a minimum follow-up of 5years. However, the medial PF compartment of the UKA group was minimal, and worsened or progressed by only one grade. III.