Can double-level osteotomy prevent patellofemoral osteoarthritis progression compared with open wedge high tibial osteotomy?

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

To compare radiographic, clinical, and arthroscopic findings in patellofemoral (PF) osteoarthritis (OA) between open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) and double-level osteotomy (DLO) with the same operative indication. After adjustment for patient age, and coronal alignment, 36 knees with OWHTO alone and 36 knees with DLO were compared. Radiographic, clinical, and arthroscopic findings were documented before osteotomy. Arthroscopic findings were observed 1year after osteotomy, and clinical and radiographic findings were observed 2years after osteotomy. Patellar height was evaluated using the Insall-Salvati (IS) ratio, Carton-Deschamps (CD) index, and Blackburne-Peel (BP) index. Lateral patellar tilt and patellar shift were measured. A power analysis was performed. The postoperative CD and BP indices in the OWHTO group were lower than those in the DLO group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). The CD and BP indices in both groups significantly decreased postoperatively (all p < 0.001). Tilting angles in the OWHTO and DLO groups significantly decreased postoperatively (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). There were no significant differences in American Knee Society scores, Kujala score, and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores between both groups. The PF OA progression of the trochlear in the OWHTO group was higher than that in the DLO group (p = 0.002), and the PF OA progression of the patellar facet in the DLO group and anterior femoral condyle in both groups on the lateral side were higher than those on the medial side (p = 0.006, 0.032, and 0.041, respectively). DLO decreased the rate of low patellar height compared with OWHTO. DLO decreased the rate of PF OA progression in the trochlea compared with OWHTO. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes in both groups. Level III, case-control study.