Open Total Gastrectomy Research Articles

Short- and Long-term Outcomes of Surgical Treatment for Remnant Gastric Cancer After Distal Gastrectomy.

Remnant gastric cancer (RGC) after distal gastrectomy occurs in 1-2% of patients, while the biological features of RGC are unknown. A total of 22 consecutive patients with RGC who underwent total gastrectomy were analyzed. Their disease history included either gastric cancer (n=16) or peptic ulcer (n=6). Overall, 18 underwent open total gastrectomy (OTG) and 4 underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG). The mean number of lymph nodes dissected and metastatic lymph nodes was larger in the Ulcer group than in the Carcinoma group (p<0.005). The mean operation time was longer in the LTG than OTG (p<0.005). The median blood loss tended to be smaller in the LTG (p=0.090). Five-year overall and recurrence-free survival rates were 94% and 81%, respectively. The status of lymph node metastasis after surgery for RGC should be cautiously considered in the context of disease history. Both LTG and OTG can be treatment options for RGC.

Non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia associated with enteral feeding after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: report of two cases and review of the literature

BackgroundNon-occlusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI) is a rare but life-threatening complication of early postoperative enteral feeding. We herein report two patients who developed NOMI during enteral feeding after esophagectomy.Case presentationIn case 1, a 75-year-old man with no medical history was diagnosed with multiple primary cancers of the esophagus, stomach, and kidney. He underwent percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement followed by thoracoscopic esophagectomy and cervical esophagostomy placement as the first-stage operation. Gastrostomy feeding was started on postoperative day (POD) 3 with a polymeric formula (ENSURE H®). On POD 7, he developed acute abdominal pain and distension with bloody drainage through the gastrostomy tube. Dynamic computed tomography showed massive hepatic portal venous gas and pneumatosis intestinalis. Angiography showed diffuse spasms in the branches of the superior mesenteric artery. Under a diagnosis of NOMI, we started intra-arterial infusion of papaverine and prostaglandin E1. His symptoms improved, and he was discharged on POD 48.In case 2, a 68-year-old man with diabetes and atrial fibrillation was diagnosed with esophageal cancer. His medical history was significant for pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for gastric cancer and small bowel resection for trauma. He underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy, open total gastrectomy, colonic reconstruction, and jejunostomy tube placement. Adhesiolysis for abdominal severe adhesions caused by previous operations was difficult. Jejunostomy feeding was started on POD 3 with a polymeric formula (Racol®). On POD 7, he developed persistent diarrhea and cervical anastomotic leakage. On POD 9, he developed acute abdominal pain and distension with bloody drainage through the jejunostomy tube. Dynamic computed tomography showed the same findings as in case 1. Under a diagnosis of NOMI, we started intravenous infusion of papaverine and prostaglandin E1. His symptoms improved, and he was discharged on POD 28.ConclusionsThe causes of feeding-related NOMI may include the use of a high-osmolarity formula, preoperative malnutrition, abdominal adhesiolysis, systemic inflammation after anastomotic leakage, and a medical history of diabetes and atrial fibrillation. NOMI should be considered as a differential diagnosis in patients with these risk factors and clinical features such as acute abdominal pain and distension during enteral feeding.

Long-term outcome of laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis.

77 Background: Laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is technically and oncologically challenging procedure for surgeons. The aim of this study is to compare technical safety and long-term oncologic feasibility of LTG for AGC patients compared to open total gastrectomy (OTG) using propensity score (PS)-matched analysis. Methods: Between 2004 and 2014, 185 patients (OTG: 127, LTG: 58) underwent total gastrectomy due to advanced gastric cancer. PS-matching was done using patients’ age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status, extent of lymph node dissection, presence of combined resection and pathological stage of gastric cancer. Comparisons were made based on surgical outcomes and long-term survival rates. Results: After PS-matching, 102 patients, respectively 51 patients for each group, were enrolled. LTG had longer tumor-free proximal resection margin (OTG 2.5 cm vs. LTG 3.0 cm, p = 0.008). Total number of retrieved lymph node and metastasized lymph node was similar in both groups. The retrieved number of lymph nodes around splenic hilum (#10 and #11d) was similar in both groups (p = 0.105). Longer operation time was required in LTG (OTG 240 min. vs. LTG 320 min, p = 0.002) but less intraoperative bleeding was observed in LTG (OTG 390 cc vs. LTG 276 cc, p &lt; 0.001). Patients of LTG were discharged earlier than OTG (OTG 12 days vs. LTG 10 days, p = 0.043). Overall morbidity and mortality of both group was similar. Between two groups, there was not a difference in 5-year overall survival rate (OTG 56.3% vs. LTG 56.5%, p = 0.597) or disease free survival rate (OTG 59.0% vs. LTG 67.6%, p = 0.455). Conclusions: For treating proximal AGC, LTG may be a technically and oncologically safe and feasible method.

Feasibility of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for advanced Siewert type Ⅱ and type Ⅲ esophagogastric junction carcinoma: A propensity score-matched case-control study

This study aims to compare laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) with open total gastrectomy (OTG) for treating advanced Siewert type Ⅱ and type Ⅲ adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG). The data for this study included 872 patients with advanced Siewert type Ⅱ and type Ⅲ AEG who were candidates for undergoing total gastrectomy from January 2012 to December 2017 in Gastrointestinal Surgery Department of the First Hospital of Jilin University. After screening all the patients' data, 722 patients underwent the propensity score match (PSM) and out of them, 685 patients were selected and grouped into LTG group (n=468) and OTG group (n=217). Observing the patients' C reactive protein (CRP) level (p<0.001) and pain score on postoperative day (POD) 1 (p<0.001) and POD2 (p<0.001) showed that the patients in LTG group were less stressed than those in OTG group. Moreover, patients who underwent LTG were able to sooner take liquid food (p<0.001), get off beds to walk (p<0.001), restore bowel function (p<0.001), and had shorter postoperative stay (p<0.001). On the other hand, these two groups showed no significant difference regarding postoperative complication rate (p=0.19). The median survival for the LTG and OTG groups was 56 months and 47 months, respectively, and the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 40% and 29.1%, respectively. The LTG group obtained better OS (p<0.01), with hazard ratio of 0.69 (LTG vs. OTG, 95% confidence interval, 0.52 to 0.91). Moreover, the hazard ratio of Siewert type Ⅱ was 0.79 (95% confidence interval, 0.46 to 1.12) and that of Siewert type Ⅲ was 1.16 (95% confidence interval, 0.78 to 1.54). It can thus be seen that LTG is a safe and effective method for treating patients with advanced Siewert type Ⅱ and type Ⅲ AEG and patients with Siewert type Ⅱ AEG may benefit more from LTG in the long term.

Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Testing of the Perigastric Vagus Nerve Branches to Evaluate Viability and Signals along Nerve Pathways during Gastrectomy.

PurposeThe perigastric vagus nerve may play an important role in preserving function after gastrectomy, and intraoperative neurophysiologic tests might represent a feasible method of evaluating the vagus nerve. The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of neurophysiologic evaluations of the function and viability of perigastric vagus nerve branches during gastrectomy.Materials and MethodsThirteen patients (1 open total gastrectomy, 1 laparoscopic total gastrectomy, and 11 laparoscopic distal gastrectomy) were prospectively enrolled. The hepatic and celiac branches of the vagus nerve were exposed, and grabbing type stimulation electrodes were applied as follows: 10–30 mA intensity, 4 trains, 1,000 µs/train, and 5× frequency. Visible myocontractile movement and electrical signals were monitored via needle probes before and after gastrectomy. Gastrointestinal symptoms were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively at 3 weeks and 3 months, respectively.ResultsResponses were observed after stimulating the celiac branch in 10, 9, 10, and 6 patients in the antrum, pylorus, duodenum, and proximal jejunum, respectively. Ten patients responded to hepatic branch stimulation at the duodenum. After vagus-preserving distal gastrectomy, 2 patients lost responses to the celiac branch at the duodenum and jejunum (1 each), and 1 patient lost response to the hepatic branch at the duodenum. Significant procedure-related complications and meaningful postoperative diarrhea were not observed.ConclusionsIntraoperative neurophysiologic testing seems to be a feasible methodology for monitoring the perigastric vagus nerves. Innervation of the duodenum via the celiac branch and postoperative preservation of the function of the vagus nerves were confirmed in most patients.Trial RegistrationClinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0000823

Study on safety of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for clinical stage I gastric cancer: the protocol of the CLASS02\u201301 multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial

BackgroundThe safety of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for the treatment of gastric cancer remains lack of clinical evidence. The Chinese Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (CLASS) Group recently launched a multicenter randomized clinical trial (CLASS02–01) to compare the safety of LTG for clinical stage I gastric cancer with the conventional open total gastrectomy (OTG).MethodsThis CLASS02–01 trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open, and non-inferiority trial. Two hundred patients who met the inclusion criteria and did not accord with the exclusion criteria will be randomly divided into LTG group (n = 100) and OTG group (n = 100). The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the early operative morbidity and mortality of LTG compared with OTG for clinical stage I gastric adenocarcinoma. The second purpose is to evaluate the recovery course and compare the postoperative hospital stay of the patients enrolled in this study.DiscussionThis CLASS02–01 trial is the first prospective randomized two-arm controlled study to determine the safety of LTG compared with OTG. Through this trial, we hope to show that experienced surgeons can safely perform LTG with lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03007550. December 30, 2016.

Introduction of minimally invasive surgery for distal and total gastrectomy: a population-based study

BackgroundMinimally invasive gastrectomy has been introduced in Western populations during the last decade. As minimally invasive distal gastrectomy (MIDG) versus total gastrectomy (MITG) are procedures with a different complexity, outcomes may differ. The aim of this population-based cohort study was to evaluate the safety of MIDG and MITG. Materials and methodsAll patients who underwent potentially curative gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma were included from the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit (2011–2016). Propensity score matching was applied to create comparable groups of patients receiving open distal gastrectomy (ODG) versus MIDG and open total gastrectomy (OTG) versus MITG, using patient and tumor characteristics. Postoperative outcomes and short-term oncological outcomes were appraised. ResultsOf the 1970 eligible patients, 1138 underwent distal gastrectomy and 832 underwent total gastrectomy. For distal gastrectomy, 390 ODG were matched to 288 MIDG patients. Although overall postoperative morbidity and mortality were similar, patients who underwent MIDG encountered less intra-abdominal abscesses (4% vs. 1%, p = 0.039) and wound complications (6% vs. 2%, p = 0.021). The median hospital stay was shorter after MIDGs (9 vs. 7 days, p < 0.001). For total gastrectomy, 323 OTG patients were matched to 258 MITG patients. Overall postoperative morbidity, mortality and hospital stay were similar, whereas the anastomotic leakage rate was higher after MITGs (11% vs. 17%, p = 0.030). Short-term oncological outcomes between both groups were equal for distal and total gastrectomy. ConclusionBenefits of MIG during the early introduction were demonstrated for distal gastrectomy but not for total gastrectomy. An increased anastomotic leakage rate was encountered for MITG.

Laparoscopic total gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer: A single-institution experience.

The incidence of remnant gastric cancer is increasing because of past use of subtotal gastrectomy to treat peptic ulcer and increased survival rates after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. The feasibility and advantages of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for remnant gastric cancer remain unclear. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the safety, feasibility, and clinical short-term outcomes of LTG for remnant gastric cancer. Patients who underwent completion total gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer between April 2007 and October 2017 were divided into two groups: the open total gastrectomy (OTG) group and the LTG group. Clinicopathological data and short-term outcomes were analyzed. A total of 31 remnant gastrectomies (23 OTG, 8 LTG) were performed. Blood loss was significantly lower in the LTG group than in the OTG group (135.5 vs 568.3 mL, P = 0.013). However, there was no significant difference in the operation time, days to food intake, or length of hospital stay between the two groups. Additionally, there was no significant difference in the postoperative complications, number of retrieved lymph nodes, or pathological findings. Two LTG patients (25.0%) required conversion to open surgery. There was no mortality in either group. LTG for remnant gastric cancer can be a safe treatment option and may have an advantage of less blood loss than OTG.

Clinical research status of laparoscopic total gastrectomy in China

Many retrospective and cohort studies have shown that laparoscopic total gastrectomy(LTG) has advantages of less trauma, quicker recovery and better incision than open total gastrectomy, and is not inferior to laparotomy in safety and the short- and long-term outcomes, so it has been widely applied. However there is still a lack of high level evidence-based basis. At present, several prospective multicenter clinical studies are being carried out in China, Japan and South Korea which have high incidence of gastric cancer to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of LTG and evaluate its long-term outcomes as well. A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the safety of laparoscopic and open radical gastrectomy(CLASS-02 Research) conducted by Professor Sun Yihong, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, is under way. The subjects of this study were the patients with clinical stage I(, the lesion locating in the gastric body, gastric fundus, or the esophagogastric junction (not involving the cardia dentate line), who were expected to be treated with total gastrectomy. The primary outcome measures were early operative morbidity and mortality and the secondary outcome measures were early postoperative recovery course and postoperative hospital stay. It is believed that results of the study will provide a high level evidence-based basis for the safety of LTG. The ongoing JCOG-1401 study in Japan aims to assess the feasibility and safety of LTG and LAPG for the treatment of early gastric cancer. LTG (Roux-en-Y reconstruction) or LAPG (double-tract or jejunal interposition reconstruction) will be performed in patients with clinical stage I( gastric cancer in this study. The primary endpoint of the study is the incidence of anastomotic leakage, and the secondary endpoints are proportion of patients converted to open surgery, the time to the first flatus, analgesic requirement, postoperative body temperature, the overall survival and relapse-free survival. The follow-up time is at least 5 years, and the results will also effectively evaluate the long-term efficacy of LTG and LAPG in the treatment for early gastric cancer. No.10 lymph nodes dissection of D2 total gastrectomy is a major difficulty in LTG. Japanese JCOG-0110 study has showed that for proximal gastric cancer patients without involvement of the greater curvature of the stomach, routine splenectomy for No.10 lymph nodes dissection is not recommended. In this regard, Professor Huang Changming, Union Hospital of Fujian Medical University, led the ongoing CLASS-04 study to evaluate the safety, feasibility and clinical efficacy of laparoscopic No.10 lymph node dissection with spleen preservation for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer locating in the upper part of the stomach. The ongoing CLASS-02 and JCOG-1401 studies will answer whether LTG is suitable for the treatment of early gastric cancer. We believe that in the absence of high level evidence-based basis, LTG should be applied cautiously to advanced gastric cancer, and LTG for early gastric cancer patients should also be operated by experienced surgeons.

Introducing laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer in general practice: a retrospective cohort study based on a nationwide registry database in Japan.

Although laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) is considered a technically demanding procedure with safety issues, it has been performed in several hospitals in Japan. Data from a nationwide web-based data entry system for surgical procedures (NCD) that started enrollment in 2011 are now available for analysis. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from 32,144 patients who underwent total gastrectomy and were registered in the NCD database between January 2012 and December 2013. Mortality and morbidities were compared between patients who received LTG and those who underwent open total gastrectomy (OTG) in the propensity score-matched Stage I cohort and Stage II-IV cohort. There was no significant difference in mortality rate between LTG and OTG in both cohorts. Operating time was significantly longer in LTG while the blood loss was smaller. In the Stage I cohort, LTG, performed in 33.6% of the patients, was associated with significantly shorter hospital stay but significantly higher incidence of readmission, reoperation, and anastomotic leakage (5.4% vs. 3.6%, p<0.01). In the Stage II-IV cohort, LTG was performed in only 8.8% of the patients and was associated with significantly higher incidence of leakage (5.7% vs. 3.6%, p<0.02) although the hospital stay was shorter (15days vs. 17days, p<0.001). LTG was more discreetly introduced than distal gastrectomy, but remained a technically demanding procedure as of 2013. This procedure should be performed only among the well-trained and informed laparoscopic team.

The gastric carcinosarcoma with severe venous invasion: a case report

BackgroundGastric carcinosarcoma with severe venous invasion is extremely rare, and to the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case.Case presentationA 79-year-old man visited the Onomichi General Hospital following abnormal upper gastrointestinal series findings. Laboratory data demonstrated no anemia, and the serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels were not elevated. Endoscopy identified a Borrmann type III lesion in the cardiac end of the stomach. Abdominal contrast-enhanced computerized tomography (CT) indicated that the lesser curvature of the stomach wall was modestly enhanced with bulky lymph nodes. Pathological biopsy examination identified a group 5, papillary adenocarcinoma. We diagnosed advanced gastric cancer with bulky lymph nodes (cT4aN3M0, cStage IIIC). Following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the patient underwent open total gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection. Histopathologically, the tumor consisted of two components: a tubular adenocarcinoma and a sarcoma. The tumor cells were mainly intravenous and were not detected in the gastric wall stroma; this resulted in a venous invasion. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that the tumor was positive for vimentin and partly positive for desmin and cytokeratin CAM5.2. We diagnosed a true gastric carcinosarcoma with severe venous invasion. Abdominal CT 2 months after surgery showed a low density area in the liver, suggesting metastasis.ConclusionsCarcinosarcomas with lymph node metastasis are sometimes reported, but progression into the vasculature is very rare. We present a case of carcinosarcoma with unusual progression characteristics.

A Comparison of the Body Composition Changes Between Laparoscopy-assisted and Open Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

Laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) for gastric cancer may prevent the loss of body weight or lean body mass after surgery due to its reduced surgical stress compared with open total gastrectomy (OTG). A total of 303 patients were examined in this study. All patients received the same perioperative care via fast-track surgery. The body weight and composition were evaluated using a bioelectrical impedance analyzer within 1 week before and at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery. Two hundred and eight patients received OTG, and 95 received LATG. Although the clinical T factor and N factor were significantly different between these two groups, other clinical factors were similar. The respective body weight loss (1 week/1 month/3 months) was -4.7%/-8.0%/-11.9% in the OTG group and -4.7%/-8.2%/-11.6% in the LATG group, that were not significantly different between the two groups at any time point of measurement (p=0.698/0.528/0.534, respectively). The respective lean body mass loss (1 week/1 month/3 months) was -4.2%/-6.4%/-7.4% in the OTG group and -4.0%/-5.8%/-6.2% in the LATG group, that were not significantly different between the groups (p=0.503/0.588/0.946, respectively). The body composition changes were similar between the OTG and LATG groups using the same perioperative care of fast-track surgery. Adopting a laparoscopic approach would not help in reducing loss of body weight or lean body mass after gastric cancer surgery.

A comparison of short-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy and open total gastrectomy in early gastric cancer

A comparison of short-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy and open total gastrectomy in early gastric cancer

Internal Hernia After Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.

The aim of this study was to clarify internal hernia (IH) characteristics after laparoscopic gastrectomy. This was a retrospective study of 1943 consecutive gastric cancer patients who underwent surgery at our institute between 2004 and 2015. Since 2013, our technique includes antecolic Roux-en-Y (RY) with closure of all mesenteric defects during laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) as standard. Postoperative IH was only detected in patients who underwent total gastrectomy with RY reconstruction. Furthermore, the incidence of IH was significantly higher after LTG than after open total gastrectomy (4.9% vs. 1.0%; P=0.005). IH after LTG occurred in 8.0% of patients before standardization with closure of the mesenteric defects, but no IH was observed after standardization (P=0.047). Closure of all mesenteric defects is recommended for gastric cancer patients who undergo LTG with antecolic RY. Registration number: UMIN000009163/000025029 (www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/).

Totally laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A case-matched study about short-term outcomes.

Although surgical outcomes of totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG) have been reported from several centers, the effectiveness of this technique has not been conclusively established. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of TLTG for gastric cancer.A prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed data were used by comparing the short-term surgical outcomes of 124 patients who underwent TLTG with those of 124 patients who underwent open total gastrectomy (OTG) between March 2007 and March 2016.The 2 groups were well matched with respect to age, sex, body mass index, ASA score, and tumor stage. There was no significant difference with regard to the operation time but TLTG showed significantly less intraoperative blood loss (115.5 ± 70.2 vs 210.5 ± 146.7 mL, P < .01). Total numbers of retrieved lymph nodes were similar in the 2 groups. Postoperatively, no significant differences were found for morbidity or mortality. The time to first flatus, initiate oral intake, and postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter in the TLTG group than in the OTG group (3.2 ± 1.0 vs 4.1 ± 1.2 days; 4.4 ± 1.2 vs 5.6 ± 2.0 days; and 8.9 ± 3.1 vs 11.3 ± 4.5 days, respectively; P < .01).TLTG for gastric cancer is technically safe, feasible, and minimally invasive compared with OTG. A prospective randomized trial is needed to establish the value of TLTG.

Successful conversion surgery for gastric cancer with multiple liver metastases treated after S-1 plus cisplatin combination chemotherapy: a case report

BackgroundGastric cancer with multiple liver metastases have poor prognosis. Recently, stage IV gastric cancer patients who respond well to systemic chemotherapy can be treated by gastrectomy. We herein report a case of advanced gastric cancer with liver metastases who was successfully downstaged by systemic chemotherapy and underwent conversion surgery.Case presentationA 60-year-old male patient was diagnosed with gastric cancer with multiple liver metastases [cT3N3M1, stage IV]. After 18 courses of S-1 plus cisplatin combination chemotherapy (S-1 administered orally (80 mg/m2/day) twice a day for 21 consecutive days and cisplatin (60 mg/m2) infused on day 8), marked regression of liver metastasis was achieved, and we performed open total gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection. The patient was discharged from the hospital 10 days after the operation. Histopathological examination revealed no malignant cells in the lymph nodes [ypT1bN0M0, stage IA]. S-1 as the adjuvant chemotherapy was administered for 12 months, and the patient is alive without a recurrence for 33 months after surgery.ConclusionsConversion surgery may improve the poor prognosis of gastric cancer.

P-121 - Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer?A propensity score-matched analysis

P-121 - Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer?A propensity score-matched analysis

Comparisons of short-term and survival outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients.

ObjectivesThe safety and surgical oncology of laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) remain inconclusive and challenging. This study aimed to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes between LATG and open total gastrectomy (OTG) procedures.ResultsIn the all-included analyses, there were 69 patients in the LATG group and 268 in the OTG group. LATG was as safe as OTG without increasing postoperative morbidity and mortality. Stage imbalance might introduce differences in the numbers of harvested lymph nodes in LATG (34.4 ± 12.0) and OTG (40.9 ± 16.9), whereas 95.7% of patients underwent D2/D2+ dissection during the LATG procedure. After a median 31 months of follow-up, the overall survival outcomes were comparable between the LATG and OTG procedures (HR = 1.16, 95% CI 0.68–1.97). Sensitivity analysis found comparable node retrieval and stage-specific or treatment-specific overall survival.Materials and MethodsA retrospective case-control study was conducted among gastric cancer patients who underwent either LATG or OTG with curative intention between June 2006 and December 2015. Data retrieval was based on the Surgical Gastric Cancer Patient Registry in the West China Hospital. The primary outcome was overall survival. The secondary outcomes were postoperative complication incidence and severity, operation duration, blood loss, number of harvested lymph nodes, and postoperative hospital stay. Matched pairwise case-control comparisons were performed as a sensitivity analysis.ConclusionsLATG by experienced surgeons possibly has comparable short-term surgical outcomes and long-term survival outcomes compared with OTG for gastric cancer patients. However, high-quality RCTs are necessary before confirmative judgment and recommendation as an optional treatment in general practice.

Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.

BackgroundFew studies have been designed to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG), and a retrospective study of a large patient cohort is valuable before conducting randomized controlled clinical trials.ResultsAmong all patients, age, tumor location, histologic type, pT stage, pN stage and pTNM stage significantly differed between the LATG group and OTG group. After the propensity score matching, the clinicopathological characteristics did not significantly differ between groups. The operation time, estimated blood loss, time to first flatus and the number of retrieved lymph nodes (P < 0.05) were better in the LATG group than the OTG group. Morbidity and mortality were lower in the LATG group than the OTG group (P < 0.05) for pre-matched patients. However, significant intergroup differences in morbidity were not identified after propensity matching. Although overall survival did not significantly differ between groups for the pre-matched patients, the 3-year cumulative survival rates were significantly lower in the LATG group (89.9%) than the OTG group (97.7%) for patients with stage I disease (P = 0.028). After propensity score matching, the analysis of the cumulative survival curve did not show a significant difference for any cancer stage.Materials and MethodsWe prospectively collected data from 1096 patients who underwent total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Propensity score matching was applied to compare the covariates between the LATG group and the open total gastrectomy (OTG) group. Operative outcomes and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups.ConclusionsImplementation of LATG for gastric cancer is a safe, reliable and minimally invasive procedure with long-term outcomes similar to those of OTG. Further randomized controlled clinical trials can be conducted to provide valuable evidence of the safety and efficacy of LATG in treating gastric cancer.

Clinical efficacy of surgical treatment for stage IV gastric cancer after conversion therapy

Clinical efficacy of surgical treatment for stage IV gastric cancer after conversion therapy