In recent decades, hybrid testing (HT) technology, which combines numerical simulation with large-scale structural experiments to simulate the nonlinear response of seismic structures more economically, has been developed as an alternative to the shaking table test (STT). However, research focused on validating HT results through large-scale structural dynamic tests is limited. This study aims to investigate the reliability of HT results by comparing them with those of the STT for a large-scale RC structure. The prototype structure considered in the HT is a half-scale seven-story RC building that was previously tested on a (8 m × 8 m) shaking table to investigate the dynamic response of RC structures during extreme ground motions. An open-source HT framework, involving the finite-element software OpenSees and control middleware OpenFresco, is employed as the HT tool. The hybrid model used in the HT consists of a two-column physical substructure and a nonlinear numerical substructure with plastic hinges, which was validated by numerical simulation before the test. A comparison between the results of the HT and STT reveals that the HT effectively reproduces the STT results for the 7-story RC structure, including inter-story drifts, inter-story shear forces, and floor accelerations under different ground motion intensities. This validates the reliability of the HT and demonstrates its advantages in conducting large-scale RC structure experiments.
Read full abstract