JULIA REINHARD LUPTON Othello Circumcised: Shakespeare and the Pauline Discourse of Nations IN HIS ESSAY “Is THERE A NEo-RACISM?” Etienne Balibar pro- poses that we now live under a new ideology of the nations, a “racism-without- races” that promotes various forms of ethnic cleansing under the alibi of “cultural” identity, purity, or autonomy, a discourse that co-opts and neutralizes the postwar vocabulary of liberal humanism and pluralism. Balibar links this neoracism of the late modem to the protoraczsm of the early modern period: A racism which does not have the pseudo-biological concept of race as its main driving force has always existed, and it has existed at exactly this level of secondary theoretical elaborations. Its prototype is anti-Semitism. Modern anti-Semitism—the form which be- gins to crystallize in the Europe of the Enlightenment, if not indeed from the period in which the Spain of the Reconquisla and the Inquisition gave a statist, nationalistic inflexion to theological anti-J udaism—is already a “culturalist” racism. . . . in many respects the whole of current differentialist racism may be considered, from the formal point of view, as a generalized anti-Semitism. This consideration is particularly important for the interpretation of contemporary Arabaphobia, especially in France, since it carries with it an image of Islam as a “conception of the world” which is incompatible with Europeanness.' Mapping contemporary neo-racism onto the deep structures of anti-Semitism, Balibar derives the anti-Islamic strain in contemporary politics from the long tradition of anti-jewish thought in Western historiography. Following Balibar's diagnosis, I argue here that Shakespeare’s Othello provides a canonical articulation of this protoracism insofar as the play fashions the Muslim in the image of the Jew according to the protocols of Pauline exegesis; in Balibar's terms, Othello stages a “culturalist” rather than biologistic ordering of intergroup relations, a reli- giously grounded discourse barely visible from the vantage point of the modern racial theories that have since displaced it, yet intermittently readable in the strange light of the neoracism that has emerged in recent years. A fundamental religious ambiguity vexes the racialization of Othello through- out the play; although his professed Christianity authorizes Othello’s place in Venice, the play never decisively determines whether he has converted from a pagan religion or from Islam. I argue that the black Gentile of a universal church undergirds Othello’s opening narrative of international romance, but that this di- vine comedy of pagan conversion is continually shadowed by the more troubling possibility of Othello’s entrance into Christianity via its disturbing neighbor, Is- lam. This secondary scenario, which subsumes Islam within what Balibar calls “a REPRESENTATIONS 57 - Winter 1997 © THE REGENTS or THE UNIVERSITY or CALIFORNIA 73
Read full abstract