Major Open Abdominal Surgery Research Articles

Preoperative intravenous iron for anaemia in elective major open abdominal surgery: the PREVENTT RCT.

Anaemia affects 30-50% of patients before they undergo major surgery. Preoperative anaemia is associated with increased need for blood transfusion, postoperative complications and worse patient outcomes after surgery. International guidelines support the use of intravenous iron to correct anaemia in patients before surgery. However, the use of preoperative intravenous iron for patient benefit has not been assessed in the setting of a formal clinical trial. To assess if intravenous iron given to patients with anaemia before major abdominal surgery is beneficial by reducing transfusion rates, postoperative complications, hospital stay and re-admission to hospital, and improving quality of life outcomes. A multicentre, double-blinded, randomised, controlled, Phase III clinical trial, with 1 : 1 randomisation comparing placebo (normal saline) with intravenous iron (intravenous ferric carboxymaltose 1000 mg). Randomisation and treatment allocation were by a secure web-based service. The study was conducted across 46 hospitals in England, Scotland and Wales between September 2013 and September 2018. Patients aged > 18 years, undergoing elective major open abdominal surgery, with anaemia [Hb level of > 90 g/l and < 120 g/l (female patients) and < 130 g/l (male patients)] who could undergo randomisation and treatment 10-42 days before their operation. Double-blinded study comparing placebo of normal saline with 1000 mg of ferric carboxymaltose administered 10-42 days prior to surgery. Co-primary end points were risk of blood transfusion or death at 30 days postoperatively, and rate of blood transfusions at 30 days post operation. A total of 487 patients were randomised (243 given placebo and 244 given intravenous iron), of whom 474 completed the trial and provided data for the analysis of the co-primary end points. The use of intravenous iron increased preoperative Hb levels (mean difference 4.7 g/l, 95% confidence interval 2.7 to 6.8 g/l; p < 0.0001), but had no effect compared with placebo on risk of blood transfusion or death (risk ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 1.37; p = 0.84; absolute risk difference +0.8%, 95% confidence interval -7.3% to 9.0%), or rates of blood transfusion (rate ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.68 to 1.43; p = 0.93; absolute rate difference 0.00, 95% confidence interval -0.14 to 0.15). There was no difference in postoperative complications or hospital stay. The intravenous iron group had higher Hb levels at the 8-week follow-up (difference in mean 10.7 g/l, 95% confidence interval 7.8 to 13.7 g/l; p < 0.0001). There were a total of 71 re-admissions to hospital for postoperative complications in the placebo group, compared with 38 re-admissions in the intravenous iron group (rate ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.34 to 0.85; p = 0.009). There were no differences between the groups in terms of mortality (two per group at 30 days post operation) or in any of the prespecified safety end points or serious adverse events. In patients with anaemia prior to elective major abdominal surgery, there was no benefit from giving intravenous iron before the operation. The impact of iron repletion on recovery from postoperative anaemia, and the association with reduced re-admission to hospital for complications, should be investigated. In the preoperative intravenous iron to treat anaemia in major surgery (PREVENTT) trial, all patients included had anaemia and only 20% had their anaemia corrected before surgery. The definition and causality of iron deficiency in this setting is not clear. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN67322816 and ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01692418. This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25 No. 11. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

The impact of total intravenous anesthesia versus inhalation anesthesia on acute kidney injury after major abdominal surgery: a propensity score analysis.

The effect of anesthetic types on postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) remains unclear particularly in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and inhalation anesthesia in terms of the risk of AKI after open major abdominal surgery (MAS). Adult patients who underwent open MAS (gastrectomy, hepatectomy, colectomy, or pancreatectomy) at our institute from2016 to2018 were included. Using the multivariable logistic regression, the risk of postoperative AKI was compared among patients who underwent TIVA (TIVA group) and inhalation anesthesia (inhalation group) both in the total cohort and in the propensity score-matched cohort. Additional multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score. In total, 3616 patients were analyzed. The incidence of postoperative AKI was 5.0% (77/1546) and 7.8% (161/2070) in the TIVA and inhalation groups, respectively. The risk of AKI was significantly higher in the inhalation group [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.27-2.35; P = 0.002] than the TIVA group. In the matched cohort (n = 1518 in each group), the inhalation group also had a higher risk of AKI (aOR 1.66; 95% CI 1.20-2.31; P = 0.002). The multivariable logistic regression with IPTW showed similar results (aOR 1.59; 95% CI 1.30-1.95; P < 0.001). The risk of AKI after open MAS differed significantly according to the anesthetic used. Patients receiving inhalation anesthesia may have a greater risk of postoperative AKI than those undergoing TIVA.

Goal-directed hemodynamic therapy versus restrictive normovolemic therapy in major open abdominal surgery: A randomized controlled trial

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to compare the occurrence of postoperative complications in patients undergoing elective open abdominal surgery and receiving intraoperative goal-directed hemodynamic therapy or restrictive normovolemic therapy. MethodsA total of 401 patients were randomized in the goal-directed hemodynamic therapy or restrictive normovolemic therapy groups. A cardiac output monitor was used in all goal-directed hemodynamic therapy patients and was left at the discretion of anesthetists in charge of patients in the restrictive normovolemic therapy group. The primary outcome was a composite morbidity endpoint (30-day mortality and complications grade 2–4 according to Dindo-Clavien classification). Secondary outcomes were the hospital duration of stay, the incidence of pulmonary, cardiovascular, and renal complications up to 30 days after surgery, and midterm survival. ResultsIntraoperatively, the goal-directed hemodynamic therapy group received higher intravenous fluid volumes (mean of 10.8 mL/kg/h and standard deviation of 4.0) compared with the restrictive normovolemic therapy group (mean of 7.2 mL/kg/h and standard deviation of 2.0; P < .001). On the first postoperative day, similar fluid volumes were infused in the 2 groups. The primary outcome occurred in 57.7% of goal-directed hemodynamic therapy and 53.0% of restrictive normovolemic therapy (relative risk, 1.09 [95% confidence interval, 0.91–1.30]), and there was no significant difference between groups for any secondary outcomes. ConclusionAmong patients undergoing major open abdominal surgery, the goal-directed hemodynamic therapy and the restrictive normovolemic therapy were associated with similar incidence of moderate-to-severe postoperative complications and hospital resource use.

Preoperative intravenous iron to treat anaemia before major abdominal surgery (PREVENTT): a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial

SummaryBackgroundPreoperative anaemia affects a high proportion of patients undergoing major elective surgery and is associated with poor outcomes. We aimed to test the hypothesis that intravenous iron given to anaemic patients before major open elective abdominal surgery would correct anaemia, reduce the need for blood transfusions, and improve patient outcomes.MethodsIn a double-blind, parallel-group randomised trial, we recruited adult participants identified with anaemia at preoperative hospital visits before elective major open abdominal surgery at 46 UK tertiary care centres. Anaemia was defined as haemoglobin less than 130 g/L for men and 120 g/L for women. We randomly allocated participants (1:1) via a secure web-based service to receive intravenous iron or placebo 10–42 days before surgery. Intravenous iron was administered as a single 1000 mg dose of ferric carboxymaltose in 100 mL normal saline, and placebo was 100 mL normal saline, both given as an infusion over 15 min. Unblinded study personnel prepared and administered the study drug; participants and other clinical and research staff were blinded to treatment allocation. Coprimary endpoints were risk of the composite outcome of blood transfusion or death, and number of blood transfusions from randomisation to 30 days postoperatively. The primary analysis included all randomly assigned patients with data available for the primary endpoints; safety analysis included all randomly assigned patients according to the treatment received. This study is registered, ISRCTN67322816, and is closed to new participants.FindingsOf 487 participants randomly assigned to placebo (n=243) or intravenous iron (n=244) between Jan 6, 2014, and Sept 28, 2018, complete data for the primary endpoints were available for 474 (97%) individuals. Death or blood transfusion occurred in 67 (28%) of the 237 patients in the placebo group and 69 (29%) of the 237 patients in the intravenous iron group (risk ratio 1·03, 95% CI 0·78–1·37; p=0·84). There were 111 blood transfusions in the placebo group and 105 in the intravenous iron group (rate ratio 0·98, 95% CI 0·68–1·43; p=0·93). There were no significant differences between the two groups for any of the prespecified safety endpoints.InterpretationPreoperative intravenous iron was not superior to placebo to reduce need for blood transfusion when administered to patients with anaemia 10–42 days before elective major abdominal surgery.FundingUK National Institute of Health Research Health Technology Assessment Program.

Major elective abdominal surgery acutely impairs lower limb muscle pyruvate dehydrogenase complex activity and mitochondrial function

SummaryBackground & aimsThis post hoc study aimed to determine whether major elective abdominal surgery had any acute impact on mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDC) activity and maximal mitochondrial ATP production rates (MAPR) in a large muscle group (vastus lateralis -VL) distant to the site of surgical trauma.MethodsFifteen patients undergoing major elective open abdominal surgery were studied. Muscle biopsies were obtained after the induction of anesthesia from the VL immediately before and after surgery for the determination of PDC and maximal MAPR (utilizing a variety of energy substrates).ResultsMuscle PDC activity was reduced by >50% at the end of surgery compared with pre-surgery (p < 0.05). Muscle MAPR were comprehensively suppressed by surgery for the substrate combinations: glutamate + succinate; glutamate + malate; palmitoylcarnitine + malate; and pyruvate + malate (all p < 0.05), and could not be explained by a lower mitochondrial yield.ConclusionsPDC activity and mitochondrial ATP production capacity were acutely impaired in muscle distant to the site of surgical trauma. In keeping with the limited data available, we surmise these events resulted from the general anesthesia procedures employed and the surgery related trauma. These findings further the understanding of the acute dysregulation of mitochondrial function in muscle distant to the site of major surgical trauma in patients, and point to the combination of general anesthesia and trauma related inflammation as being drivers of muscle metabolic insult that warrants further investigation.Clinical trial registrationRegistered at (NCT01134809).

A survey of neuraxial analgesic preferences in open and laparoscopic major abdominal surgery amongst anaesthetists in Australia and New Zealand.

Practising anaesthetists who are Fellows of the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists were surveyed with the objective of gaining insight into current analgesic preferences, with particular regard to neuraxial techniques, when managing patients having major open and laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Major abdominal surgery is common and effective analgesia is fundamental to optimal postoperative recovery. A multitude of analgesic options exist, with epidurals recommended in recent Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols. We believe the place of epidurals is increasingly questioned in the setting of continuous improvement in surgical technique, with increasing laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgery. Evidence for various techniques is mixed and benefit-risk profiles exist for all alternatives. An opioid epidemic and abuse crisis has directed attention towards opioid minimisation strategies. The survey was completed by 28% (275) of the 975 Fellows who received it, with good representation across the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists' general membership. Respondents manage laparoscopic major abdominal surgery more frequently than open procedures, with approximately one-third of respondents each providing anaesthesia for two open laparotomies versus four to eight laparoscopic cases per month. Respondents reported a high perceived benefit of neuraxial analgesia, which was discordant with their clinical practice. Less than half of the respondents used epidural or spinal analgesia in open surgery (48% versus 49% of respondents, respectively). A minority (16%) of respondents use a neuraxial technique in major laparoscopic surgery, with a strong preference for intrathecal morphine (74%) when they choose to do so. Further investigation of the role of intrathecal analgesia is warranted given the shift towards laparoscopic major abdominal surgery, the perceived benefits of neuraxial techniques and the need for opioid-sparing analgesic strategies.

Bilateral continuous erector spinae plane block: an alternative to epidural catheter for major open abdominal surgery.

Bilateral continuous erector spinae plane block: an alternative to epidural catheter for major open abdominal surgery.

Estimated oxygen extraction versus dynamic parameters of fluid-responsiveness for perioperative hemodynamic optimization of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial

BackgroundGoal directed therapy (GDT) is able to improve mortality and reduce complications in selected high-risk patients undergoing major surgery. The aim of this study is to compare two different strategies of perioperative hemodynamic optimization: one based on optimization of preload using dynamic parameters of fluid-responsiveness and the other one based on estimated oxygen extraction rate (O2ER) as target of hemodynamic manipulation.MethodsThis is a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Adult patients undergoing elective major open abdominal surgery will be allocated to receive a protocol based on dynamic parameters of fluid-responsiveness or a protocol based on estimated O2ER. The hemodynamic optimization will be continued for 6 h postoperatively. The primary outcome is difference in overall postoperative complications rate between the two protocol groups. Fluids administered, fluid balance, utilization of vasoactive drugs, hospital length of stay and mortality at 28 day will also be assessed.DiscussionAs a predefined target of cardiac output (CO) or oxygen delivery (DO2) seems to be not adequate for every patient, a personalized therapy is likely more appropriate. Following this concept, dynamic parameters of fluid-responsiveness allow to titrate fluid administration aiming CO increase but avoiding fluid overload. This approach has the advantage of personalized fluid therapy, but it does not consider if CO is adequate or not. A protocol based on O2ER considers this second important aspect. Although positive effects of perioperative GDT have been clearly demonstrated, currently studies comparing different strategies of hemodynamic optimization are lacking.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04053595. Registered on 12/08/2019.

Distal splenopancreatectomy after previous open liver resection. Is the robot a valid option?

Presenter: Roberto Bustos MD | University of Illinois at Chicago Background: The Robotic approach in patients with previous major open abdominal surgery is still a matter of debate. Our experience suggests that, with proper planning, it is safe. Herein, we present a case of distal splenopancreatectomy in a patient with previous abdominal surgery safely managed in a minimally invasive approach. Methods: A 69-year-old male with PSH of liver cholangiocarcinoma resection one year prior, presents to clinic with a newly diagnosed distal pancreatic mass, discovered incidentally during a CT scan. Before surgery, the patient had 4 rounds of chemotherapy utilizing Fulfirinox. A robotic distal splenopancreatectomy was planned. Initially, trocars were placed in the left lateral quadrant to take down adhesions involving the stomach, liver, small bowel loops, transverse colon and omentum, that were covering the access to the surgical target. After a good surgical space was achieved, the robot was redocked targeting the distal pancreas. Results: Operative time was 211 minutes and estimated blood loss was 200 cc. The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged on POD6. Final pathology shows a T1N0 neuroendocrine tumor. The patient had no pain medication requirements and tolerating diet 1 week after surgery. Conclusion: The operation was accomplished safely and uneventfully. Further studies are needed to draw further Conclusions.

Changes in plasma volume before and after major abdominal surgery following stroke volume variation-guided fluid therapy: a randomized controlled trial.

The aim of intraoperative fluid therapy is to avoid both hypovolemia and hypervolemia; however, the patient's exact volume status is difficult to determine during surgery. Fluid optimization guided by stroke volume variation (SVV) has been widely used in patients undergoing major open abdominal surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in plasma volume before and after surgery following SVV-guided fluid therapy. Patients were randomly allocated into one of two groups according to the SVV criteria for fluid administration during surgery. In the fixed SVV fluid strategy group, fluid was administered to maintain the SVV below 13%. In the individual SVV group, individual SVV values of each patient were maintained until the end of surgery. Plasma volume, body weight, and extracellular water (ECW) were measured before and after surgery. Plasma volume was estimated using the indocyanine green dilution technique. A total of 118 patients were included. Median (25-75%) plasma volumes in the preoperative and postoperative period were 2.46 (2.20-2.88) L and 2.69 (2.33-3.12) L for the fixed SVV group (N.=57, P=0.133), respectively, and 2.56 (2.23-2.90) L and 2.89 (2.48-3.19) L for the individual SVV group (N.=61, P<0.001), respectively. Fluid administration during surgery to maintain SVV below 13% was effective for maintaining the preoperative plasma volume until the end of surgery in patients undergoing major open stomach or colorectal surgery. This result supports the validity of SVV-guided fluid therapy, which maintains the SVV value below 13%, in terms of maintaining patient volume status.

Bio-electrical impedance analysis for perioperative fluid evaluation in open major abdominal surgery

Water retention and intercompartmental redistribution occur frequently in association with adverse postoperative outcomes, yet the available strategies for non-invasive assessment are limited. One such approach for evaluating body water composition in various circumstances is bio-electrical impedance analysis (BIA). This study aims to appraise the usefulness of the Body Composition Monitor (BCM, Fresenius Medical Care, Germany) in assessing body fluid composition and intercompartmental shifts before and after open major abdominal surgery. This prospective, clinician blinded observational study enrolled all the patients scheduled consecutively for elective major open abdominal surgery during a 1-year period starting from January 1st, 2016. BIA parameters—total body water (TBW), extracellular water (ECW), intracellular water (ICW), absolute fluid overload (AFO), and relative fluid overload (RFO) were measured before and after surgery. The results were compared with fluid balance and outcome parameters such as organ dysfunction, ICU-and hospital length of stay (-LOS). The study population included 71 patients aged 60.2 ± 12 of whom 60.6% men and with a BMI of 26.3 ± 5.1 kg/m2. Postoperative acute kidney injury, respiratory dysfunction, and infections occurred in 14.0%, 19.7% and 28.1% of cases, respectively. The median LOS in ICU was 20 h and the hospital-LOS was 10 days. Positive intraoperative fluid balance (2.4 ± 1.0 L) resulted in a significant increase of TBW (1.4 ± 2.4 L) and of ECW (1.4 ± 1.2 L). Intraoperative fluid balance significantly correlated with TBW change (r = 0.23, p = 0.04) and with AFO change (r = 0.31, p < 0.01). A significant correlation was found between pre- and postoperative AFO and RFO on one hand, and ICU-LOS on the other. BIA may be a useful tool for the perioperative assessment of volume status.

Effectiveness of a national quality improvement programme to improve survival after emergency abdominal surgery (EPOCH): a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial

Emergency abdominal surgery is associated with poor patient outcomes. We studied the effectiveness of a national quality improvement (QI) programme to implement a care pathway to improve survival for these patients. We did a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial of patients aged 40 years or older undergoing emergency open major abdominal surgery. Eligible UK National Health Service (NHS) hospitals (those that had an emergency general surgical service, a substantial volume of emergency abdominal surgery cases, and contributed data to the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit) were organised into 15 geographical clusters and commenced the QI programme in a random order, based on a computer-generated random sequence, over an 85-week period with one geographical cluster commencing the intervention every 5 weeks from the second to the 16th time period. Patients were masked to the study group, but it was not possible to mask hospital staff or investigators. The primary outcome measure was mortality within 90 days of surgery. Analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. This study is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN80682973. Treatment took place between March 3, 2014, and Oct 19, 2015. 22 754 patients were assessed for elegibility. Of 15 873 eligible patients from 93 NHS hospitals, primary outcome data were analysed for 8482 patients in the usual care group and 7374 in the QI group. Eight patients in the usual care group and nine patients in the QI group were not included in the analysis because of missing primary outcome data. The primary outcome of 90-day mortality occurred in 1210 (16%) patients in the QI group compared with 1393 (16%) patients in the usual care group (HR 1·11, 0·96-1·28). No survival benefit was observed from this QI programme to implement a care pathway for patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery. Future QI programmes should ensure that teams have both the time and resources needed to improve patient care. National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research Programme.

Long Intravascular Persistence of 20% Albumin in Postoperative Patients.

Albumin may persist intravascularly for a shorter time in patients after major surgery than in healthy volunteers due to a surgery-induced breakdown (shedding) of the endothelial glycocalyx layer. In this nonrandomized clinical trial, an IV infusion of 3 mL/kg of 20% albumin was given at a constant rate during 30 minutes to 15 patients on the first day after major open abdominal surgery (mean operating time 5.9 h) and to 15 conscious volunteers. Blood samples and urine were collected during 5 h and mass balance calculations used to estimate the half-lives of the administered albumin molecules and the induced plasma volume expansion, based on measurements of hemodilution and the plasma albumin concentration. At the end of the infusions, albumin had diluted the plasma volume by 13.3% ± 4.9% (mean ± SD) in the postoperative patients and by 14.2% ± 4.8% in the volunteers (mean difference -0.9, 95% CI, -4.7 to 2.9; 1-way ANOVA P = .61), which amounted to twice the infused volume. The intravascular half-life of the infused albumin molecules was 9.1 (5.7-11.2) h in the surgical patients and 6.0 (5.1-9.0) h in the volunteers (Mann-Whitney U test, P = .26; geometric mean difference 1.2, 95% CI, 0.8-2.0). The half-life of the plasma volume expansion was 10.3 (5.3-17.6; median and interquartile range) h in the surgical patients and 7.6 (3.5-9.0) h in the volunteers (P = .10; geometric mean difference 1.5, 95% CI, 0.8-2.8). All of these parameters correlated positively with the body mass index (correlation coefficients being 0.42-0.47) while age and sex did not affect the results. Twenty percent albumin caused a long-lasting plasma volume expansion of similar magnitude in postoperative patients and volunteers.

Stroke Volume Variation and Pleth Variability Index- Are They Two Faces of the Same Coin?

Introduction: Fluid requirement in patients undergoing major bowel surgery has been a matter of debate and no consensus has been reached. Stroke Volume Variation (SVV) and Pleth Variability Index (PVI) are dynamic indicators of preload. One is invasive and well established where as the other, is noninvasive and relatively new.Aim: This study was designed to compare SVV and PVI when used simultaneously and continuously in patients undergoing major open abdominal surgery. Materials and Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted on patients undergoing major open abdominal surgery. They were monitored continuously with FloTrac® to measure SVV and Masimo pulse oximeter to measure PVI, along with standard monitoring. Readings of both SVV and PVI were noted at baseline and every 10 minutes thereafter till the end of surgery. SVV was used for clinical decision-making and fluid infusion. The displayed PVI at each of these time points was observed for concurrence between the pair of measurements.Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS 15.0 software. SVV and PVI measurements were compared by correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman analysis. Interclass correlation coefficients with respect to individual patient data are expressed using R software.Results: A total of 516 pairs of measurements were obtained from 15 patients. The pattern of variation of both SVV and PVI was similar in all patients. Mean PVI reading was ≈2-3% higher than SVV. When individual readings of PVI and SVV were plotted against each other, there was very weak positive correlation (r=0.3742). Bland-Altman plot showed the scatter to be wide, reiterating lack of agreement. The median (IQR) difference between SVV and PVI was -2% (-4 to -1%) but the range was very wide (-18% to 9%). Perfusion Index (PI) was > 0.5 in 95% of all individual readings (490/516).Conclusion: PVI overestimates and is unreliable as an indicator of fluid requirement as compared to SVV. PVI cannot be substituted for SVV in patients undergoing major open abdominal surgery.

The impact of timing of antibiotics on in-hospital outcomes after major emergency abdominal surgery.

Patients undergoing major open emergency abdominal surgery experience high morbidity and mortality rates and often have sepsis at admission. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between antibiotic timing and in-hospital outcomes such as complications, need for reoperation, length of stay, and 30-day mortality. This retrospective observational cohort study was conducted between January 2010 and December 2015 including patients that were triaged through the emergency department for subsequent major open abdominal surgery. All relevant perioperative data were extracted from medical records. The outcomes of interest were development of in-hospital postoperative complications, reoperations, length of stay, and 30-day mortality, all in association with antibiotic timing, categorized according to 0-6, 6-12, or > 12h from triage. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to evaluate adjusted outcomes associated with antibiotic timing. A total of 408 patients were included, of whom 107 (26.2%) underwent at least one reoperation and 55.4% had at least one postoperative complication. These complications consisted of 26% surgical complications and 74% medical complications. Of the surgical complications, 73% were Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3. The median length of stay was 9days and the overall 30-day mortality was 17.9%. The data showed that the development of complications, need for reoperation, 30-day mortality, and the length of stay were significantly correlated to delayed antibiotic administration of more than 12h from admission. Antibiotic administration more than 12h from triage was associated with a significantly increased risk of postoperative complications, need for reoperation, 30-day mortality, and a prolonged length of stay, when compared to patients that received antibiotic treatment 0-6h and 6-12h after triage. Our data suggest that prophylactic antibiotics should be administered to all patients undergoing major open emergency abdominal surgery; however, the dose and duration cannot be concluded on the basis of our data and should be further examined.

Outcome impact of hemodynamic and depth of anesthesia monitoring during major cancer surgery: a before-after study.

Hemodynamic and depth of anesthesia (DOA) monitoring are used in many high-risk surgical patients without well-defined indications and objectives. We implemented monitoring guidelines to rationalize hemodynamic and anesthesia management during major cancer surgery. In early 2014, we developed guidelines with specific targets (Mean arterial pressure > 65mmHg, stroke volume variation < 12%, cardiac index > 2.5lmin-1m-2, central venous oxygen saturation > 70%, 40 < bispectral index < 60) for open abdominal cancer surgeries > 2h. Pre-, intra-, and post-operative data were collected from our electronic medical record database and compared before (March-August 2013) and after (March-August 2014) guideline implementation. A total of 596 patients were studied, 313 before (Before group) and 283 after (After group) guideline implementation. The two groups were comparable for age, ASA score, physiological P-POSSUM score, and surgery duration, but the operative P-POSSUM score was higher in the after group (20 vs. 18, p = 0.009). The use of cardiac output, central venous oxygen saturation and DOA monitoring increased from 40 to 61%, 20 to 29%, and 60 to 88%, respectively (all p-values < 0.05). Intraoperative fluid volumes decreased (16.0 vs. 14.5mlkg-1h-1, p = 0.002), whereas the use of inotropes increased (6 vs. 11%, p = 0.022). Postoperative delirium (16 vs. 8%, p = 0.005), urinary tract infections (6 vs. 2%, p = 0.012) and median hospital length of stay (9.6 vs. 8.8days, p = 0.032) decreased. In patients undergoing major open abdominal surgery for cancer, despite an increase in surgical risk, the implementation of guidelines with predefined targets for hemodynamic and DOA monitoring was associated with a significant improvement in postoperative outcome.

Surgical injury: comparing open surgery and laparoscopy by markers of tissue damage.

BackgroundMajor abdominal surgery (MAS) is high-risk intervention usually accompanied by tissue injury leading to a release of signaling danger molecules called alarmins. This study evaluates the surgical injury caused by two fundamental types of gastrointestinal surgical procedures (open surgery and laparoscopy) in relation to the inflammation elicited by alarmins.Patients and methodsPatients undergoing MAS were divided into a mixed laparoscopy group (LPS) and an open surgery group (LPT). Serum levels of alarmins (S100A8, S100A12, HMGB1, and HSP70) and biomarkers (leukocytes, C-reactive protein [CRP], and interleukin-6 [IL-6]) were analyzed between the groups. The secondary objectives were to compare LPT and LPS cancer subgroups and to find the relationship between procedure and outcome (intensive care unit length of stay [ICU-LOS] and hospital length of stay [H-LOS]).ResultsA total of 82 patients were analyzed. No significant difference was found in alarmin levels between the mixed LPS and LPT groups. IL-6 was higher in the LPS group on day 2 (p=0.03) and day 3 (p=0.04). Significantly higher S100A8 protein levels on day 1 (p=0.02) and day 2 (p=0.01) and higher S100A12 protein levels on day 2 (p=0.03) were obtained in the LPS cancer subgroup. ICU-LOS and H-LOS were longer in the LPS cancer subgroup.ConclusionThe degree of surgical injury elicited by open MAS as reflected by alarmins is similar to that of laparoscopic procedures. Nevertheless, an early biomarker of inflammation (IL-6) was higher in the laparoscopy group, suggesting a greater inflammatory response. Moreover, the levels of S100A8 and S100A12 were higher with a longer ICU-LOS and H-LOS in the LPS cancer subgroup.

Feasibility evaluation of an action camera for video documentation in open abdominal surgery

Intraoperative video recording in abdominal surgery has become indispensable for educational and scientific reasons. Documentation of open surgery is still technically demanding. Since no perfect camera system exists, modern action cameras may offer a solution to this problem. A head-mounted ActionPro X7 camera (ACTIONPRO, Roethenbach, Germany) was tested in 50 open abdominal surgeries. Full HD (High Definition) videos were of excellent quality and allowed a first-person view of the operation field. Short battery life of approximately 80 min, wearing discomfort, and recurrent connectivity problems were significant limitations. Modern action cameras can provide high-quality videos in open abdominal surgery. They offer an inexpensive and widely available alternative for surgical video documentation. (1) First-time usage of an action camera in major open abdominal surgery. (2) Handsfree filming allowing easy documentation of versatile technical approaches and special intraoperative observations. (3) High-quality footage filmed with a cost-effective camera.

Postoperative inflammation and insulin resistance in relation to body composition, adiposity and carbohydrate treatment: A randomised controlled study

SummaryBackground & aimsThe aims of this study were to identify whether differences in distribution of adipose tissue and skeletal muscle in obese and non-obese individuals contribute to the magnitude of the postoperative inflammatory response and insulin resistance, with and without preoperative treatment with carbohydrate drinks.MethodsThirty-two adults (16 obese/16 non-obese) undergoing elective major open abdominal surgery participated in this 2 × 2 factorial, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Participants received Nutricia preOp® or placebo (800 ml on the night before surgery/400 ml 2–3 h preoperatively) after stratifying for obesity. Insulin sensitivity was measured using the hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp preoperatively and on the 1st postoperative day. Vastus lateralis, omental and subcutaneous fat biopsies were taken pre- and postoperatively and analysed after RNA extraction. The primary endpoint was within subject differences in insulin sensitivity.ResultsMajor abdominal surgery was associated with a 42% reduction in insulin sensitivity from mean(SD) M value of 37.3(11.8) μmol kg−1 fat free mass (FFM) to 21.7(7.4) μmol kg−1 FFM, but this was not influenced by obesity or preoperative carbohydrate treatment. Activation of the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells (TREM1) pathway was seen in response to surgery in omental fat samples. In postoperative muscle samples, gene expression differences indicated activation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR-α)/retinoid X-receptor (RXR-α) pathway in obese but not in non-obese participants. There were no significant changes in gene expression pathways associated with carbohydrate treatment.ConclusionThe reduction in insulin sensitivity associated with major abdominal surgery was confirmed but there were no differences associated with preoperative carbohydrates or obesity.

Preoperative physiotherapy for the prevention of respiratory complications after upper abdominal surgery: pragmatic, double blinded, multicentre randomised controlled trial

ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy of a single preoperative physiotherapy session to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) after upper abdominal surgery.DesignProspective, pragmatic, multicentre, patient and assessor blinded, parallel group, randomised placebo...