Open Group Research Articles

Vascular Complications in Patients with ECMO Support after Cardiac Surgery.

Background: This study assessed vascular complications in patients who received extracorporeal membrane support following cardiac surgery. Methods: We included 84 post-cardiotomy patients who underwent extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) from July 2018 to May 2022. Only patients connected to VA-ECMO (Veno-Arterial) via peripheral cannulation were included in this study. Vascular complications were compared between those who had ECMO placed using the percutaneous technique (n = 52) and those who had it placed via femoral incision (n = 32). Results: The incidence of vascular thromboembolism was significantly higher in the percutaneous technique group compared with the open technique group (p < 0.05). Hematomas were also more frequent in the percutaneous technique group (p = 0.04). Conversely, bleeding and leakage were significantly more frequent in the open technique group (p = 0.04). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of wound infections or revisions in the inguinal area following ECMO removal. The mortality rate associated with vascular ischemia was 81.2%, while the overall in-hospital mortality rate was 60.7%. Conclusions: The open technique for ECMO placement may reduce the risk of thromboembolic events and hematomas compared to the percutaneous technique. However, it may be associated with a higher incidence of bleeding and leakage. Both techniques show similar outcomes in terms of overall mortality and wound infections.

Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary tumors: A randomized clinical trial.

There is a lack of robust evidence on the efficacy of laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy compared to open surgery. This study was aimed to compare time to functional recovery (FR) between laparoscopic and open pancreatoduodenectomy. This pragmatic, multicenter, randomized controlled phase 3 trial was conducted in seven tertiary centers. Patients with periampullary tumors were randomized using a block design in a 1:1 ratio and stratified by pancreatic fistula risk. Participants were randomized to undergo open or laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy by expert pancreatic surgeons. The primary outcome was the time to FR, defined as the number of days until FR was achieved in all five domains. The secondary endpoints included perioperative and short-term oncological outcomes. Between March 2019 and June 2022, 252 patients were randomly assigned to the laparoscopic (n=125) or open groups (n=127). Primary outcomes were reported in 235 patients. The mean time to FR was shorter in laparoscopic group compared to the open group (7.7d vs. 9.0d, P=0.03). Laparoscopic group exhibited a higher cumulative rate of FR compared to the open group (Hazard ratio,1.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.74; P=0.02). Severe complications, R0 resection, the number of retrieved lymph nodes and short-term survival rates were comparable between the two groups. Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy demonstrated modest advantages in FR time over open surgery for selected patients with experienced surgeons.

Open Abdominal Management for Damage Control in Liver Transplantation: A Single-center Experience.

Patients undergoing liver transplantation are in a state of coagulopathy before surgery because of liver failure. Intraoperative hemorrhage, massive transfusions, and post-reperfusion syndrome further contribute to coagulopathy, acidosis, and hypothermia. In such situations, temporary cessation of surgery with open abdominal management and resuscitation in the intensive care unit (ICU), which is commonly used as a damage control strategy in trauma care, may be effective. We assessed the outcomes of open abdominal management in liver transplantation and the corresponding complication rates. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of patients undergoing open abdominal management among 250 consecutive liver transplantation cases performed at our institution from 2009 to 2022. Open abdominal management was indicated in 16 patients. The open abdomen management group had higher Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores (24 versus 16, P < 0.01), a higher incidence of previous upper abdominal surgery (50% versus 18%, P < 0.01), more pretransplant ICU treatment (31% versus 10%, P = 0.03), and more renal replacement therapy (38% versus 12%, P = 0.01). At the time of the damage control decision, coagulopathy (81%), acidosis (38%), hypothermia (31%), and a high-dose noradrenaline requirement (75%) were observed. The abdominal wall was closed in the second operation in 75% of patients, in the third operation in 19%, and in the fourth operation in 6%. Postoperatively, the frequency of early allograft dysfunction was predominantly higher in the open abdominal management group (69%), whereas the frequency of vascular complications and intra-abdominal infection was the same as in other patients. Open abdominal management can be a crucial option in cases of complex liver transplant complicated by conditions such as hypothermia, acidosis, coagulopathy, and hemodynamic instability. Damage control management minimizes deterioration of the patient's condition during surgery, allowing completion of the planned procedure after stabilizing the patient's overall condition in the ICU.

Effectiveness comparison of open reduction and hook plate fixation versus closed indirect reduction and dorsal extension blocking Kirschner wire fixation for bony mallet finger

To compare the effectiveness of open reduction and hook plate fixation versus closed indirect reduction and dorsal extension blocking Kirschner wire fixation for bony mallet fingers. The clinical data of 68 patients with bony mallet finger who admitted between May 2019 and June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 33 cases were in the open group (treated with open reduction and hook plate fixation) and 35 cases were in the closed group (treated with closed indirect reduction and dorsal extension blocking Kirschner wire fixation). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of gender, age, the affected side, the affected finger, cause of injury, time from injury to operation, and Wehbé-Schneider classification ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, fracture healing time, time of returning to work, and postoperative complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. At 12 months after operation, visual analogue scale (VAS) score was used to assess the pain of the injured finger, active flexion range of motion and extension deficit of the distal interphalangeal joint (DIP) were measured by goniometer, and the effectiveness was assessed by Crawford criteria. All patients in the two groups were followed up 12-26 months, with an average of 15 months. There was no significant difference in the follow-up time between the closed group and the open group ( P>0.05). The operation time in the closed group was shorter than that in the open group, and the intraoperative fluoroscopy times, the fracture healing time, and the time of returning to work in the closed group were more than those in the open group, and the differences were significant ( P<0.05). In the closed group, there were 5 cases of pinning tract infection and 3 cases of small area pressure ulcer skin necrosis on the dorsal side of the finger, which were cured after intensive nursing and dressing change. Local nail depression deformity occurred in 7 cases in the open group, and the deformity disappeared after removal of plate. The incisions of the other patients healed uneventfully without complications such as infection, skin necrosis, exposure of the internal fixation, or nail deformity. There was no significant difference in the incidence of skin necrosis between the two groups ( P>0.05), but the differences in the incidence of infection and nail deformity between the two groups were significant ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS score, DIP active flexion range of motion, DIP extension deficiency, or Crawford criteria evaluation between the two groups at 12 months after operation ( P>0.05). At last follow-up, there was no DIP osteoarthritis and joint degeneration in both groups. Open reduction and hook plate fixation versus closed indirect reduction and dorsal extension blocking Kirschner wire fixation have their own advantages and disadvantages, but both of them have good results in the treatment of bony mallet fingers. Open reduction and hook plate fixation is recommended for young patients with bony mallet fingers who are eager to return to work.

Short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched cohort study.

Radical surgery remains the primary option for locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) as it has the potential to considerably extend the patient's lifespan. At present, the effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for LRRC remains unclear. The clinical data of patients with LRRC who were admitted to the Cancer Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences between 2015 and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Patients were categorized into two groups, namely the open group and the laparoscopic group, based on the surgical method used. Propensity score matching was used to reduce baseline differences. The short-term outcomes and long-term survival between the two groups were compared. Curative surgery was performed on 111 patients who were diagnosed with LRRC. After propensity score matching, a total of 80 patients were included and divided into the laparoscopic group (40 patients) and the open group (40 patients). The laparoscopic group had less intraoperative bleeding (100 vs. 300, P = 0.011), a lower postoperative complication rate (20.0% vs. 42.5%, P = 0.030), a lower incidence of wound infection (0 vs. 15.0%, P = 0.026), and a shorter time to first flatus (2 vs. 3, P = 0.005). The laparoscopic group had higher 3-year overall survival (85.4% vs. 57.5%, P = 0.016) and 3-year disease-free survival (63.9% vs 36.5%, P = 0.029). In comparison to open surgery, laparoscopic surgery is linked to less bleeding during the operation, quicker recovery after the surgery, and a lower incidence of infections at the surgical site. Moreover, laparoscopic surgery for LRRC might yield superior long-term survival outcomes.

Management of Femoral and Tibial Shaft Fractures in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury Patients.

To compare outcomes and complications between non-operative and operative management of femur and tibia fractures in patients with paraplegia or quadriplegia from chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). Design: Retrospective cohort study. Three Level-1 Trauma centers. All adult patients with paraplegia or quadriplegia due to a chronic SCI with operative or nonoperative treatment of a femoral or tibial shaft fracture from 01/01/2009 through 12/31/2019 were included. Outcomes collected included range of motion, pain, return to baseline activity, extent of malunion and treatment complications (infection, pressure ulcers, nonunion, DVT/PE, stroke, amputation, death). Comparison between operative and nonoperative treatment were made for each outcome. Fifty-nine patients with acute lower extremity fracture in the setting of chronic SCI fulfilled inclusion criteria with a median age of 46 years in the operative group and 47 years in the non-operative group. Twelve patients (70.6%) in the nonoperative group were male with 32 (76.2%) male patients in the operative group. Forty-six patients (78%) presented as low energy trauma. Differences were seen between operative and non-operative management for pressure ulcers (19% vs 52.9%, p=0.009) and mean VAS pain score at first follow-up (1.19 vs 3.3, p=0.03). No difference was seen for rates of infection, nonunion, DVT/PE, stroke, amputation, death, return to baseline activity, and range of motion. Tibial and femoral shaft fractures commonly resulted from low energy mechanisms in patients with chronic SCI. Operative treatment seemed to decrease morbidity in these patients via lowered rates of pressure ulcers and decreased pain compared to non-operative management. Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Comparison of survival and complications between minimally invasive and open staging surgeries in non-endometrioid endometrial cancer

ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare survival and complications between minimally invasive surgery and open surgery and evaluate related risk factors in patients with non-endometrioid endometrial cancer. MethodsClinicopathologic characteristics; survival outcomes; complications; and prognostic factors associated with progression-free survival and overall survival were compared among patients with non-endometrioid endometrial cancer who underwent primary staging surgery using laparoscopic, robotic, or open abdominal surgery (2004–2017). ResultsIn total, 91 patients were included: 41 and 50 underwent minimally invasive surgery and open surgery, respectively. The minimally invasive surgery and open surgery groups showed similar progression-free survival (5-year progression-free survival rate, 58.7 % vs. 58.5 %; P = .925) and overall survival (5-year overall survival rate, 73.6 % vs. 80.3 %; P = .834). Intraoperative (7.2 % vs. 6.0 %; P = .111) and postoperative surgical complications (14.6 % vs. 26.0 %; P = .165) were similar between the groups. However, blood loss was lower (mean, 305.1 vs. 561.2 ml, P < .001) and hospital stay was shorter (mean, 8.2 vs. 15.4 days, P < .001) in the minimally invasive surgery group. Using multivariate analysis, lymphovascular space invasion was identified as poor prognostic factor for progression-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 3.054; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.521–6.132; P = .002) and overall survival (adjusted HR, 3.918; 95 % CI, 1.455–10.551; P = .007), whereas age ≥ 60 years was poor prognostic factor for only overall survival (adjusted HR, 5.0953; 95 % CI, 1.660–15.378; P = .004). ConclusionsSurgical outcomes did not differ between the minimally invasive and open surgery group in patients with non-endometrioid endometrial cancer. Lymphovascular space invasion was a significant survival factor in this context.

Outcomes of open versus robotic partial nephrectomy: a 20-year single institution experience.

Robotic assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN) has emerged in urologic practice for the management of appropriately sized renal masses. We provide a 20-year comparison of the outcomes of open partial nephrectomy (OPN) versus RPN for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at our institution. An IRB-approved retrospective review was conducted of RCC patients at a single institution from 2000 to 2022 who underwent RPN or OPN. In addition to demographics, procedural details including ischemia and operative time were collected. Oncologic outcomes were evaluated through Kaplan-Meier statistical analysis to determine recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) analysis. 849 patients underwent RPN while 385 underwent OPN. 61% were male with average age of 58.8 ± 12.8years. Operative time was shorter in the open group (184 vs 200min, p = 0.002), as was ischemia time (16 vs 19min, p = 0.047). However, after 2012, RPN became more common than OPN with improving ischemia time. RPN patients had significantly improved RFS (HR 0.45, p = 0.0004) and OS (HR 0.51, p = 0.0016) when controlled for T-stage and margin status. More > pT1 masses were managed with OPN than RPN (11.2 vs 5.4%, p < 0.0001). At our institution, RPN had an increasing incidence with reduced ischemia time compared to OPN over the last 10years. While higher stage renal masses were more often managed with OPN, selective use of RPN does offer improved oncologic outcomes. Further investigation is needed to evaluate optimization of the selection of RPN versus OPN in the nephron-sparing management of renal masses.

Open versus laparoscopic completion cholecystectomy in patients with previous open partial cholecystectomy; a retrospective comparative study

Background: Some patients report recurrence or persistence of their manifestations after cholecystectomy, and retained gallstones may be a relevant etiology for their complaint. Completion cholecystectomy is advised for these cases to alleviate their manifestations. No previous studies have compared the outcomes of open versus laparoscopic outcomes in these patients, especially in patients who had initial open partial procedures. That is why we performed this study to report the perioperative outcomes of the two approaches in such patients. Methodology: This is a retrospective analysis of 80 patients who had a completion cholecystectomy in our center (40 open and 40 laparoscopic cases) after initial open partial cholecystectomy. Results: The duration elapsed since the primary procedure had an average of 18 months in the open group and 21 months in the laparoscopic group. Abdominal pain and dyspepsia were the most common presentations. Some patients had stump cholecystitis or jaundice. The intraoperative assessment revealed either the residual gallbladder or a long cystic duct stump. Laparoscopy yielded shorter operative time, earlier oral intake, and shorter hospitalization periods compared to the open approach (P&lt;0.05). The latter was associated with a 20% wound infection rate that was never encountered after laparoscopy (P =0.003). Conclusion: Previous open partial cholecystectomy does not hinder subsequent laparoscopic completion cholecystectomy. Additionally, laparoscopy is associated with better perioperative outcomes than the open approach.

Open vs. closed reduction with pinning for displaced Rockwood and Wilkins' type C thumb metacarpal base fractures in children.

The treatment of severely displaced Rockwood and Wilkins' type C (RWC) thumb metacarpal basal fractures remains controversial in children. This retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy of two treatment methods, open vs. closed reduction with pinning of such injuries. This study included 30 patients with open physes, 14 boys and 16 girls, who all received either closed or open reduction treatment. The primary outcomes of interest included healing time, complications, and functional results, which were evaluated using the improved Mayo score standard. The minimum follow-up period was 24 months, with a mean of 30.3 months (range 24.0-45.0 months). Statistical significant was defined as P < 0.05. All fractures were healed within 7 weeks after surgery, regardless of which surgical approach was used. However, the recovery time was markedly faster in the closed group, with a mean of 4.2 weeks, than in the open group, with a mean of 4.7 weeks (P < 0.05). The operation time for closed group, taking 20 min in average, was also shorter than that for open group (P < 0.05). The total incidence of mild complications was lower for patients in the closed group than for patients in the open group (6.3% vs. 21.4%, P < 0.05). No major complications were observed in either group. In the closed group, a total of 15 patients exhibited excellent outcomes, while only one patient demonstrated good outcomes. On the other hand, in the open group, 12 patients experienced excellent outcomes, whereas two patients had good outcomes. There were no instances of osteomyelitis, refractures or nonunion, avascular necrosis (AVN), or premature physeal closure in either group. The data from the open group and closed group procedures for severely shifted RWC fractures in children indicate comparable prognoses and complication rates between the two groups. Obviously closed reduction, in particular, offers several advantages over open procedure, including shorter surgical duration, fewer K-wires required, and no need for open incisions. Consequently, closed reduction is the preferred method for treating such RWC fractures.

Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a multicenter real-world study

BackgroundOwing to the lack of evidence-based medical studies with large sample sizes, the surgical approach for the radical resection of rectal neuroendocrine tumors remains controversial.MethodsWe retrospectively collected the medical records of patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors who underwent radical resection at 17 large tertiary care hospitals in China between January 1, 2010, and April 30, 2022. All patients were divided into laparoscopic and open surgery groups. After propensity score matching to reduce confounders, the postoperative and oncologic outcomes were compared between the groups.ResultsWe enrolled 174 patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors who underwent radical surgery. After random matching, 124 patients were included in the comparison (62, laparoscopic surgery group; 62, open surgery group). The laparoscopic surgery group had fewer complications (14.5% vs. 35.5%, P = 0.007) and superior relapse-free survival (P = 0.048). Subgroup analysis revealed that the laparoscopic surgery group had fewer complications (10.9% vs. 34.7%, P = 0.004), shorter postoperative hospital stays (9.56 ± 5.21 days vs. 12.31 ± 8.61 days, P = 0.049) and superior relapse-free survival (P = 0.025) in the rectal neuroendocrine tumors ≤ 4 cm subgroup.ConclusionsLaparoscopic surgery was associated with improved postoperative outcomes and oncologic prognosis for patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors ≤ 4 cm; it can serve as a safe and feasible option for radical surgery of rectal neuroendocrine tumors.

Analysis between open and laparoscopic appendectomy. A comparative study of the procedure in Brazil and worldwide

Introduction: The appendix is an organ in the human body that serves as a reservoir for natural bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract and also has an immunological function that is not so well understood. The acute inflammatory process that can occur in this organ is called acute appendicitis and is the most common surgical emergency worldwide. Objectives: To carry out a literature review on the analysis between open and laparoscopic appendectomy, and to compare how this surgery is performed in Brazil and worldwide. Material and Methods: The methodology used was a literature review. The research was carried out through an electronic search of scientific articles published on the Scielo (Scientific Electronic Library Online) and Lilacs (Latin American Health Sciences Literature) and Pubmed websites. The health terminologies consulted in the Health Sciences Descriptors (DeCS/BIREME) were used to analyze open and laparoscopic appendectomy. Discussion: Appendectomy has largely replaced open surgery as the treatment of choice for diseases of the appendix, especially acute inflammation, as it has effective results and some advantages. Video appendectomy did not gain absolute acceptance as quickly as cholecystectomy, for example, and it is only in the last 10 years that this type of minimally invasive approach has excelled the open approach worldwide. Conclusion: According to the literature, laparoscopy has recently become the most prevalent way of performing appendectomy. Despite this trend, the majority of appendectomies were performed by the open route. This can be explained by logistical, financial or medical team preparation issues. Some studies have shown that the rate of complications after surgery in the laparoscopic group was significantly lower than in the open appendectomy group.

Elective Surgical Repair of Popliteal Artery Aneurysms with Posterior Approach vs. Endovascular Exclusion: Early and Long Term Outcomes of Multicentre PARADE Study

The aim of this study was compare elective surgical repair of popliteal artery aneurysms (PAAs) via a posterior approach vs. endovascular exclusion, analysing early and five year outcomes in a multicentre retrospective study. Between January 2010 and December 2023, a retrospectively maintained dataset of all consecutive asymptomatic PAAs that underwent open repair with posterior approach or endovascular repair in 37 centres was investigated. An aneurysm length of ≤ 60 mm was considered the only inclusion criterion. A total of 605 patients were included; 440 PAAs (72.7%) were treated via a posterior approach (open group) and the remaining 165 PAAs (27.3%) were treated using covered stents (Endo group). Continuous data were expressed as median with interquartile range. Thirty day outcomes were assessed and compared. At follow up, primary outcomes were freedom from re-intervention, secondary patency, and amputation free survival. Secondary outcomes were survival and primary patency. Estimated five year outcomes were compared using log rank test. At 30 days, no differences were found in major morbidity, mortality, graft occlusion, or re-interventions. Three patients (0.7%) in the open group experienced nerve injury. The overall median duration of follow up was 32.1 months. At five year follow up, freedom from re-intervention was higher in the open group (82.2% vs. 68.4%; p = .021). No differences were observed in secondary patency (open group 90.7% vs. endo group 85.2%; p = .25) or amputation free survival (open group 99.0% vs. endo group 98.4%; p = .73). A posterior approach was associated with better survival outcomes (84.4% vs. 79.4%; p = .050), and primary patency (79.8% vs. 63.8%; p = .012). Early and long term outcomes following elective repair of PAAs measuring ≤ 60 mm via a posterior approach or endovascular exclusion seem comparable. Nerve injury might be a rare but potential complication for those undergoing open surgery. Endovascular repair is associated with more re-interventions.

Effect of light walking combined with arthroscopic surgery on bone mineral density in patients with foot and ankle osteoarthritis

ObjectiveTo observe the effect of light walking combined with arthroscopic surgery on the efficacy and Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of patients with ankle arthritis. Methods 180 patients with ankle arthritis were retrospectively selected, who were divided into a control group (Group A) and an experimental group (Group B) according to treatment methods, with 90 patients in each group. Group A was treated with conventional open surgery and Group B was treated with light walking combined with arthroscopic surgery. The two groups were compared before and after treatment on scales such as the AOFAS ankle hindfoot score. Meanwhile, the patients' BMD and levels of inflammatory factors such as tumor cell necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were compared before and after treatment. Results The Kofoed and AOFAS scale scores were higher for mild walking combined with arthroscopic surgery than for conventional treatment (P < 0.05), and their pain visual analogue VAS scores were lower than for conventional treatment (P < 0.05). In Group B, the postoperative BMD increase was significantly higher (P < 0.05). The R-value between PDGF bone growth factor and BMD was 0.957 and the R-value between VEGF growth factor and BMD was 0.903. The R-value between patient age and BMD was −0.936 and the R-value between patient BMI and BMD was −0.913. The treatment efficiency in Group B was 96.7 %. Conclusion The results prove that light walking combined with arthroscopic surgery is suitable for the surgical treatment of patients with ankle arthritis because it has a better therapeutic effect and makes patients' BMD level improved.

Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A propensity-matched national analysis on surgical outcomes and healthcare disparities

BackgroundPancreatic adenocarcinoma of distal pancreas is hard to treat due to late presentation. While open distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy has had favourable outcomes, it has also had many complications which were low among Minimally invasive procedures. This retrospective cohort analysis compares minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) outcomes using a national inpatient database. MethodsThe study used 2016–2020 NIS data. The study included 1577 distal pancreatic malignant tumor surgery patients. There were 530 Minimally Invasive and 1047 Open groups. Propensity matched analysis was performed on surgical groups to reduce confounding variables. ResultsIn comparison to open procedures, minimally invasive techniques reduced hospital stays by 10 ​% (OR ​= ​0.90, 95 ​% CI 0.86–0.93). While not statistically significant, the unmatched analysis linked MIDP to lower in-hospital mortality. African Americans were 37 ​% less likely to undergo MIDP than Caucasians (OR ​= ​0.63, 95 ​% CI ​= ​0.40–0.96). ConclusionNationwide analysis suggests MIDP may be a safe and effective surgical treatment for distal pancreatic adenocarcinoma. It may reduce hospital stays and mortality over open surgery. The study also suggests race may affect minimally invasive procedure rates.

Clinical effectiveness of transaxillary single-port endoscopic surgery in the treatment of breast benign tumor.

Benign breast lumps affect 10% of women in their lifetimes. Endoscopic surgery could be an alternative surgical technique for benign breast tumors because it is performed through small wounds hidden in inconspicuous areas. The aim of this study was to explore the safety and esthetic effects of endoscopic surgery in the treatment of benign breast disease. This retrospective cohort study analyzed 363 patients with benign breast tumors from August 2021 to December 2023 in the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, of whom 118 underwent transaxillary single-port endoscopic surgery and 245 underwent traditional open surgery. Clinicopathologic characteristics, surgery type, hospital stay, and complications were analyzed to assess the effectiveness of the procedure for benign breast tumors. Breast tumor resection was successfully performed in 363 patients by endoscopic surgery or traditional open surgery. Endoscopic procedures demonstrated longer durations of surgery (98.54±35.17min vs. 70.28±26.06min, p<0.01) and postoperative drainage (64.30±34.92mL vs.18.49±19.86mL, p<0.01), but there was less blood loss. The nipple-areolar complex of the patients who underwent endoscopic resection was significantly more sensitive than the traditional open surgery group. Patients in the endoscopic group reported higher satisfaction with surgical outcome (13.10±1.97 vs. 12.63±1.90, p<0.01). And there was a significant difference in the wound scar and cosmetic outcome total score between the two groups. Transaxillary single-port endoscopic surgery is effective and safe and improves postoperative nipple-areolar sensation and cosmetic outcome, as compared to the conventional technique.

Clinical effect and prognosis of transoral or endoscope-assisted transoral release for irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation: A retrospective cohort study

BackgroundThe clinical applications of endoscope-assisted transoral release for irreducible atlantoaxial dislocations are limited. This study aimed to investigate the clinical effect and prognostic factors of traditional and endoscope-assisted transoral release, as well as posterior reduction and fixation, in treating irreducible atlantoaxial dislocations. Materials and methodsWe conducted a retrospective study on 59 patients with irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation who underwent either traditional or endoscope-assisted transoral release, posterior fixation, and fusion between January 2018 and January 2023. Various data, including surgical time, blood loss, drainage volume, oral intake, hospital stay, complications, and neurological status (assessed by the Japanese Orthopedic Association [JOA] score and Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]), were recorded. Imaging parameters such as the atlantodontoid interval (ADI), space available for the cord (SAC), and cervicomedullary angle (CMA) were analyzed and compared. In addition, the correlation between ODI, JOA and patient age, course of disease, preoperative ADI, SAC and CMA were analyzed. ResultsNo significant differences were observed in age, sex, BMI, preoperative ADI, preoperative SAC, or preoperative CMA. All patients achieved excellent reduction with no significant differences between the two groups. Patients in the endoscopic group experienced significantly reduced blood loss, earlier oral intake, and shorter hospital stays compared to those in the open group (P < 0.05). The ODI and JOA scores improved significantly in both groups at 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively (P < 0.05). Postoperative ADI, SAC, and CMA values in both groups were significantly better than preoperative values (P < 0.001). The patient age, course of disease and the preoperative ADI were negatively correlated with the postoperative ODI and the JOA improvement ratio (P < 0.01), and the preoperative SAC and preoperative CMA had positive correlations with the postoperative ODI and the JOA improvement ratio (P < 0.01) at 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. ConclusionPatient age, course of disease, preoperative ADI, SAC and CMA are correlated with the operative prognosis of irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation. The endoscope-assisted transoral approach, compared to the traditional transoral approach, is minimally invasive, resulting in less operative blood loss, earlier oral intake and a shorter length of hospital stay, which could be offered as an alternative for irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation.

The contemporary management of perforated appendicitis in adults: To operate or wait?

ObjectivesThe optimal management of perforated appendicitis remains controversial. Many studies advocate for antibiotics and an interval appendectomy whereas others suggest that performing an appendectomy at the time of presentation decreases post-operative morbidity. Confounding this argument further are the patients who fail non-operative management and end up requiring surgery during their initial hospitalization. This study aims to determine if early operative intervention should be considered for perforated appendicitis. MethodsThis was a retrospective review of all patients who underwent an appendectomy (both laparoscopic or open) for perforated appendicitis between 2015 and 2020 at our institution. ResultsA total of 271 patients met inclusion criteria for this study. Of this group, 250 patients underwent an immediate appendectomy whereas the remaining 21 patients underwent a trial of non-operative management and eventually required an appendectomy during their initial admission. When comparing the immediate versus delayed operative groups, there were no differences in demographic data including age and gender, and no differences in various imaging findings including AAST Grade IV or V appendicitis. Operatively, patients in the delayed group had a longer operative time (83.1 ± 32.9 vs. 64.1 ± 26.2, p = 0.01), were more likely to require an open operation (23.8 % vs. 2.8 %, p < 0.0001), and were more likely to have a drain placed intra-operatively (42.9 % vs 14.4 %, p = 0.004). While there were no differences in 30-day readmission rates, patients in the delayed group had a significantly longer hospital length of stay than patients in the immediate group (9.4 ± 7.4 vs. 3.1 ± 3.3, p = 0.008). ConclusionsPatients undergoing an immediate appendectomy for perforated appendicitis can discharge from the hospital sooner and demonstrate no increase in post-operative morbidity suggesting that surgeons can initially manage this disease process in an operative fashion.

Protective Effect of Minimally Invasive Approach on Postoperative Peak Transaminase Following Liver Resection: A Single-Center Propensity Score-Based Analysis.

Postoperative serum ALT levels are one of the most frequently used marker to detect liver tissue damage following liver resection. The aim of this study was to evaluate if minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) may result in less hepatic injury than open hepatectomy by assessing the differences of postoperative ALT levels. Patients who underwent MILS between 2009 and 2019 at our unit were included and compared with open liver resections. Median ALT levels was measured on postoperative day (POD) 1, 3 and 5. Postoperative peak transaminase (PPT) of ALT was determined on POD 1. The stabilized inverse probability treatment weighing (SIPTW) process was used to balance the two groups. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to analyze factors associated with high PPT. After SIPTW, 292 MILS were compared with 159 open resections. Median ALT levels on POD 1, 3 and 5 were significantly higher in the open group than in the MILS group (301 vs. 187, p = 0.002; 180 vs. 121, p < 0.0001; 104 vs. 60, p < 0.0001; respectively). At the multivariable logistic regression analysis, MILS showed a protective effect for high PPT. MILS was associated with significantly lower postoperative ALT levels compared with open liver resections. MILS showed a protective effect for high PPT.

Development of Fewer Falls in MS-An Online, Theory-Based, Fall Prevention Self-Management Programme for People With Multiple Sclerosis.

The aim of this study was to describe the process used to develop a theory-based, online fall prevention self-management programme for ambulatory and non-ambulatory people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). The development process was guided by the Medical Research Council framework of complex interventions and began with a scoping review of the literature on self-management of falls in pwMS. Subsequent phases of development were performed through iterative and concurrent processes and were informed by the perspectives of pwMS and healthcare professionals with MS expertise. Through a systematic and iterative process in close collaboration with pwMS and healthcare professionals, a theory-based online fall prevention self-management programme, Fewer Falls in MS, for ambulatory and non-ambulatory pwMS was developed. The programme is grounded in theory and pedagogical models and features utilization of action plans to address diverse influences on fall risks. A carefully operationalized definition of self-management and an iterative co-development process were essential to the creation of the Fewer falls in MS programme. Continuation of the co-development process and collaboration with end users was needed to refine the programme. PwMS and healthcare professionals were involved throughout the development process of the programme. The patient organization Neuro Sweden was contacted in the initial phase to discuss the relevance of a self-management programme to prevent falls in MS. They supported the research group (all authors) in identification of and contact with pwMS with interest to participate. Three members of the research group (S.T.J., M.F. and C.Y.), that is, the operative group, met neuro Sweden and one pwMS to further discuss the relevance of a self-management programme to prevent falls. To develop the process and content of the fall prevention programme, a co-design process was performed together with pwMS and healthcare professionals. The results of the co-design process are presented in this manuscript. In addition to participating in the co-design process, pwMS and healthcare professionals provided feedback to the research group on programme process and content on several occasions during the subsequent programme development process. In a pretest (Beta version) of the programme, four pwMS acted as test subjects and provided additional feedback on the programme to the research group. NCT04317716.