Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Research Articles

The effect of incremental increases in the number of packed red blood cell units transfused on perioperative outcomes in open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Despite abundant evidence in the surgical and critical care literature demonstrating inferior outcomes in transfused patients, liberal use of blood transfusion, particularly after the initial unit, remains common in vascular surgery. We therefore sought to investigate the incremental risk of each additional unit of blood transfused intraoperatively for patients undergoing elective open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with regards to postoperative mortality and complications. Patients in the Vascular Quality Initiative registry undergoing elective open infrarenal AAA repair from 2003 to 2020 were included. Exclusion criteria were age greater than 90, prior aortic surgery, concomitant iliac aneurysm, and concomitant additional major procedure. Multivariable logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios for in-hospital mortality with incremental increases in packed red blood cells (pRBCs) given intraoperatively. Univariate analysis was performed for secondary outcomes including postoperative cardiac, respiratory, renal, and wound complications. Of 4608 patients who underwent elective open AAA repair, 796 patients (16.9%) underwent perioperative transfusion. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 2.5%. Adjusting for relevant factors, there was an increase in the odds of in-hospital mortality of 24% for each additional unit transfused. Incremental increases in the number of units transfused were associated with significantly higher risk of postoperative myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, pulmonary complications, renal failure, and wound complications. There appears to be an important increase in the odds of mortality for each additional unit transfused during infrarenal open AAA repair even when controlling for confounders.

Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Care in the United States.

Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has had a dynamic impact on abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) care, often supplanting open AAA repair (OAR). Accordingly, US AAA management is often highlighted by disparities in patient selection and guideline compliance. The purpose of this analysis was to define secular trends in AAA care. The Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative was queried for all EVARs and OARs (2011-2021). End points included procedure utilization, change in mortality, patient risk profile, Society for Vascular Surgery-endorsed diameter compliance, off-label EVAR use, cross-clamp location, blood loss, in-hospital complications, and post-EVAR surveillance missingness. Linear regression was used without risk adjustment for all end points except for mortality and complications, for which logistic regression with risk adjustment was used. In all, 66 609 EVARs (elective, 85% [n=55 805] and nonelective, 15% [n=9976]) and 13 818 OARs (elective, 70% [n=9706] and nonelective, 30% [n=4081]) were analyzed. Elective EVAR:OAR ratios were increased (0.2 per year [95% CI, 0.01-0.32]), while nonelective ratios were unchanged. Elective diameter threshold noncompliance decreased for OAR (24%→17%; P=0.01) but not EVAR (mean, 37%). Low-risk patients increasingly underwent elective repairs (EVAR, +0.4%per year [95% CI, 0.2-0.6]; OAR, +0.6 points per year [95% CI, 0.2-1.0]). Off-label EVAR frequency was unchanged (mean, 39%) but intraoperative complications decreased (0.5% per year [95% CI, 0.2-0.9]). OAR complexity increased reflecting greater suprarenal cross-clamp rates (0.4% per year [95% CI, 0.1-0.8]) and blood loss (33 mL/y [95% CI, 19-47]). In-hospital complications decreased for elective (0.7% per year [95% CI, 0.4-0.9]) and nonelective EVAR (1.7% per year [95% CI, 1.1-2.3]) but not OAR (mean, 42%). A 30-day mortality was unchanged for both elective OAR (mean, 4%) and EVAR (mean, 1%). Among nonelective OARs, an increase in both 30-day (0.8% per year [95% CI, 0.1-1.5]) and 1-year mortality (0.8% per year [95% CI, 0.3-1.6]) was observed. Postoperative EVAR surveillance acquisition decreased (67%→49%), while 1-year mortality among patients without imaging was 4-fold greater (9.2% versus imaging, 2.0%; odds ratio, 4.1 [95% CI, 3.8-4.3]; P<0.0001). There has been an increase in EVAR and a corresponding reduction in OAR across the United States, despite established concerns surrounding guideline adherence, reintervention, follow-up, and cost. Although EVAR morbidity has declined, OAR complication rates remain unchanged and unexpectedly high. Opportunities remain for improving AAA care delivery, patient and procedure selection, guideline compliance, and surveillance.

A Patient-Centered Textbook Outcome Measure Effectively Discriminates Contemporary Elective Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Quality

IntroductionThere is persistent controversy surrounding the merit of surgical volume benchmarks being used solely as a sufficient proxy for assessing the quality of open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. Importantly, operative volume quotas may fail to reflect a more nuanced and comprehensive depiction of surgical outcomes most relevant to patients. Accordingly, we herein propose a patient-centered “textbook outcome” (TO) for AAA repair that is analogous to other large magnitude extirpative operations performed in other surgical specialties, and test its feasibility to discriminate hospital performance using Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) volume guidelines. MethodsAll elective open infrarenal AAA repairs (OAR) in the SVS-Vascular Quality Initiative were examined (2009-2022). The primary end-point was a TO, defined as a composite of no in-hospital complication or re-intervention/re-operation, length of stay ≤ 10-days, home discharge and 1-year survival. The discriminatory ability of the TO measure was assessed by comparing centers that did or did not meet the SVS annual OAR volume threshold recommendation (high-volume ≥ 10 OARs/year; low-volume <10 OARs/year). Logistic regression and multivariable models adjusted for patient and procedure-related differences. ResultsA total of 9,657 OARs across 198 centers were analyzed (mean age-69.5±8.4, female-26%, non-white-12%). A TO was identified in 44% (N = 4,293) of the overall cohort. The incidence of individual TO components included: no in-hospital complication (61%), no in-hospital re-intervention/re-operation (92%), LOS ≤ 10-days (78%), home discharge (76%), and 1-year survival (91%). Median annual center volume was 6 [IQR 3, 10] and a majority of centers did not meet the SVS volume suggested threshold (<10 OARs/year: N = 148 [74%]). However, most patients (N = 6,265 of 9,657 [65%]) underwent OAR in high-volume hospitals. When comparing high and low-volume centers, a TO was more likely to occur in high-volume institutions: ≥10 OARs/year, 46% vs. <10 OARs/year, 42%; P=.0006. The association of a protective effect for higher center volume remained after risk adjustment: OR 1.1, 95%CI 1.05-1.26; P=.003. ConclusionsTextbook outcomes for elective OAR reflect a more nuanced and comprehensive patient centered proxy to measure care delivery consistent with other surgical specialties. Surprisingly, a TO was achieved in < 50% of elective AAA cases nationally. Though the likelihood of a TO appears to correlate with SVS center volume recommendations, it more importantly reflects elements which may be prioritized by patients and thus offers insights into further improving real-world AAA care.

Predicting Outcomes Following Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Using Machine Learning

Predicting Outcomes Following Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Using Machine Learning

Activated clotting time-guided heparinization during open AAA surgery: a pilot study

BackgroundArterial thrombo-embolic complications (TEC) are still common during and after non-cardiac arterial procedures (NCAP). While unfractionated heparin has been used during NCAP for more than 70 years to prevent TEC, there is no consensus regarding the optimal dosing strategy. The aim of this pilot study was to test the effectiveness and feasibility of an activated clotting time (ACT)-guided heparinization protocol during open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery, in anticipation of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigating if ACT-guided heparinization leads to better clinical outcomes compared to a single bolus of 5000 IU of heparin.MethodsA prospective multicentre pilot study was performed. All patients undergoing elective open repair for an AAA (distal of the superior mesenteric artery) between March 2017 and January 2020 were included. Two heparin dosage protocols were compared: ACT-guided heparinization with an initial dose of 100 IU/kg versus a bolus of 5000 IU. The primary outcome was the effectiveness and feasibility of an ACT-guided heparinization protocol with an initial heparin dose of 100 IU/kg during open AAA surgery. Bleeding complications, TEC, and mortality were investigated for safety purposes.ResultsA total of 50 patients were included in the current study. Eighteen patients received a single dose of 5000 IU of heparin and 32 patients received 100 IU/kg of heparin with additional doses based on the ACT. All patients who received the 100 IU/kg dosing protocol reached the target ACT of > 200 s. In the 5000 IU group, TEC occurred in three patients (17%), versus three patients (9.4%) in the 100 IU/kg group. Bleeding complications were found in six patients (33%) in the 5000 IU group and in 9 patients (28%) in the 100 IU/kg group. No mortality occurred in either group.ConclusionsThis pilot study demonstrated that ACT-guided heparinization with an initial dose of 100 IU/kg appears to be feasible and leads to adequate anticoagulation levels. Further randomized studies seem feasible and warranted to determine whether ACT-guided heparinization results in better outcomes after open AAA repair.

Secondary aorto-enteric fistula after aortic aneurysm repair

Overview: Secondary Aorto-enteric fistula (sAEF) is a serious complication after open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, diagnosis and treatment are the sacraments for a vascular surgeons. Objectives: Describe the patient’s characteristics and treatment results of a series of clinical cases diagnosed with Secondary Aorto-enteric Fistula after surgery to open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.. Methods: A clinical case series. Results: Report on 3 clinical cases of Secondary Aorto-enteric Fistula admitted to the hospital due to gastrointestinal bleeding, underwent surgery to completely remove the graft infection, restore the intestinal fistula, perform extra-anatomic bypass (axillary-bifemoral), the results showed one patient died early postoperatively due to multiple organ failure, two patients had stable postoperative progress and were discharged. Conclusions: Secondary Aorto-enteric Fistula is a rare complication, diagnosis and treatment are often very difficult, early surgery to remove the graft, performing extra-anatomic bypass is an effective method, helping to reduce the mortality rate.

One-stage or two-stage elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery and abdominal aortic aneurysm open repair in low and moderate cardiac surgical risk patients.

One-stage or two-stage elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery and abdominal aortic aneurysm open repair in low and moderate cardiac surgical risk patients.

Earned outcomes correlate with reliability-adjusted surgical mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and predict future performance

ObjectiveCumulative, probability-based metrics are regularly used to measure quality in professional sports, but these methods have not been applied to health care delivery. These techniques have the potential to be particularly useful in describing surgical quality, where case volume is variable and outcomes tend to be dominated by statistical “noise.” The established statistical technique used to adjust for differences in case volume is reliability-adjustment, which emphasizes statistical “signal” but has several limitations. We sought to validate a novel measure of surgical quality based on earned outcomes methods (deaths above average [DAA]) against reliability-adjusted mortality rates, using abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair outcomes to illustrate the measure’s performance. MethodsEarned outcomes methods were used to calculate the outcome of interest for each patient: DAA. Hospital-level DAA was calculated for non-ruptured open AAA repair and endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) in the Vascular Quality Initiative database from 2016 to 2019. DAA for each center is the sum of observed – predicted risk of death for each patient; predicted risk of death was calculated using established multivariable logistic regression modeling. Correlations of DAA with reliability-adjusted mortality rates and procedure volume were determined. Because an accurate quality metric should correlate with future results, outcomes from 2016 to 2017 were used to categorize hospital quality based on: (1) risk-adjusted mortality; (2) risk- and reliability-adjusted mortality; and (3) DAA. The best performing quality metric was determined by comparing the ability of these categories to predict 2018 to 2019 risk-adjusted outcomes. ResultsDuring the study period, 3734 patients underwent open repair (106 hospitals), and 20,680 patients underwent EVAR (183 hospitals). DAA was closely correlated with reliability-adjusted mortality rates for open repair (r = 0.94; P < .001) and EVAR (r = 0.99; P < .001). DAA also correlated with hospital case volume for open repair (r = −.54; P < .001), but not EVAR (r = 0.07; P = .3). In 2016 to 2017, most hospitals had 0% mortality (55% open repair, 57% EVAR), making it impossible to evaluate these hospitals using traditional risk-adjusted mortality rates alone. Further, zero mortality hospitals in 2016 to 2017 did not demonstrate improved outcomes in 2018 to 2019 for open repair (3.8% vs 4.6%; P = .5) or EVAR (0.8% vs 1.0%; P = .2) compared with all other hospitals. In contrast to traditional risk-adjustment, 2016 to 2017 DAA evenly divided centers into quality quartiles that predicted 2018 to 2019 performance with increased mortality rate associated with each decrement in quality quartile (Q1, 3.2%; Q2, 4.0%; Q3, 5.1%; Q4, 6.0%). There was a significantly higher risk of mortality at worst quartile open repair hospitals compared with best quartile hospitals (odds ratio, 2.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-3.76; P = .03). Using 2016 to 2019 DAA to define quality, highest quality quartile open repair hospitals had lower median DAA compared with lowest quality quartile hospitals (−1.18 DAA vs +1.32 DAA; P < .001), correlating with lower median reliability-adjusted mortality rates (3.6% vs 5.1%; P < .001). ConclusionsAdjustment for differences in hospital volume is essential when measuring hospital-level outcomes. Earned outcomes accurately categorize hospital quality and correlate with reliability-adjustment but are easier to calculate and interpret. From 2016 to 2019, highest quality open AAA repair hospitals prevented >40 perioperative deaths compared with the average hospital, and >80 perioperative deaths compared with lowest quality hospitals.

A Core Outcome Set for Intact Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Technology and advances in clinical care have changed the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) but the clinical effectiveness of continuing advances needs to be assessed. To facilitate rapid synthesis of new evidence and improve stakeholder representation, including patients, the concept of core outcome sets (COS) has been developed. COS, reflecting the needs of all stakeholders, have been established across several surgical specialties. This study aimed to develop an international core outcome set for intact AAA repair. Following COMET methodology, potential outcomes were identified from a systematic review of published outcomes and focus groups involving patients, carers, and nurses. A 38 question Delphi consensus survey in lay language was developed (with translation to local languages); this included 35 themes identified from the findings of the systematic review and three themes from the focus groups. All three of the themes identified by the focus groups (cognitive, physical, and social functioning) can be evaluated from quality of life instruments, with overall quality of life being identified from the systematic review. The survey was completed by patients, carers or family members, vascular nurses, vascular surgeons, trainees, interventional radiologists, anaesthetists, and industry partners from six European countries. After two rounds of the survey, the top outcomes were discussed at a face to face multistakeholder consensus meeting. The 38 item questionnaire was amended after piloting among all stakeholder groups. After the first round of the Delphi survey (98 respondents) 15 questions were eliminated, and 11 further questions were eliminated after round 2 (90 respondents). This left two outcome questions for discussion at the consensus meeting, where the top six outcomes were unanimously endorsed: death at 30 days (or in hospital if longer), secondary AAA rupture, overall quality of life and retention of cognitive functioning after recovery, five year survival, and continued sac growth. Six core outcomes are recommended for use as a minimum framework in all future studies and registries of intact open and endovascular AAA repair. Further work to select instruments for quality of life and to define instruments for cognitive functioning is needed.

Assessment of fitness for open repair in patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms

ObjectiveEndovascular aortic repair (EVAR) was originally designed as a treatment modality for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) deemed unfit for open repair. However, the definition of “unfit for open repair” is largely subjective and heterogenous. The purpose of this study was to compare patients deemed unfit for open repair who underwent EVAR to a matched cohort who underwent open repair for infrarenal AAAs. MethodsThe Vascular Quality Initiative of the Society for Vascular Surgery was queried for patients who underwent EVAR and open infrarenal AAA repair from 2003 to 2022. Patients that underwent EVAR were included if they were deemed unfit for open repair by the operating surgeon. EVAR patients deemed unfit because of a hostile abdomen were excluded. Patients in both the open and EVAR datasets were excluded if their repair was deemed non-elective or if they had prior aortic surgery. EVAR patients were matched to a cohort of open patients. The primary outcome for this study was 1-year mortality. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, major adverse cardiac events, pulmonary complications, non-home discharge, reinterventions, and 5-year survival. ResultsA total of 5310 EVAR patients were identified who were deemed unfit for open repair. Of those, 3028 EVAR patients (57.0%) were able to be matched 1:1 to a cohort of open patients. Open patients had higher rates of major adverse cardiac events (20.2% vs 4.4%; P < .001), pulmonary complications (12.8% vs 1.6%; P < .001), non-home discharges (28.5% vs 7.9%; P < .001), and 30-day mortality (4.5% vs 1.4%; P < .001). There were no differences in early survival, but open repair had better middle and late survival compared with EVAR over the course of 5 years. A total of 74 EVAR patients (2.4%) had reinterventions during the study period. EVAR patients that required interventions had higher 1-year (40.5% vs 7.3%; P < .001) and 5-year mortality (43.2% vs 14.1%; P < .001) compared with those that did not require reinterventions. EVAR patients who had reinterventions had higher 1-year (40.5% vs 6.3%; P < .001) and 5-year (43.2% vs 20.3%; P = .006) mortality compared with their matched open cohort. ConclusionsPatients undergoing EVAR for AAAs who are deemed unfit for open repair have better perioperative morbidity and mortality compared with open repair. However, patients who had an open repair had better middle and late survival over the course of 5 years. The categorization of unfitness for open surgery may be inaccurate and re-evaluation of this terminology/concept should be undertaken.

The 5-Factor Modified Frailty Index is a Succinct yet Effective Predictor of Adverse Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Open Surgery for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

BackgroundFrailty is an age-related, clinically recognizable state marked by increased susceptibility. The 5-item Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) offers a concise assessment of frailty and has demonstrated its efficacy in various surgical fields. While the mFI-5 has been validated for Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA), its applicability in open surgical repair (OSR) for AAA remains largely unexplored. This study sought to evaluate the utility of mFI-5 in predicting 30-day outcomes following OSR for AAA. MethodsPatients underwent OSR for AAA were identified in ACS-NSQIP targeted database from 2012-2021. Patients were stratified into three cohorts: mFI-5 score of 0 (control), 1, and 2+. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare 30-day perioperative outcomes between frail patients and controls adjusting preoperative variables with p-value<0.1. ResultsOf the 5,249 patients who underwent OSR for AAA, 1,043 were controls, 2,938 had an mFI-5 score of 1, and 1,268 had an mFI-5 score of 2+. When compared to the control group, patients with an mFI-5=1 were more likely to have pulmonary events (aOR=1.452, p<0.01), bleeding events (aOR=1.33, p<0.01), wound complications (aOR=2.214, p<0.01), ischemic colitis (aOR=1.616, p=0.01), and unplanned reoperation (aOR=1.292, p=0.04). Those with an mFI-5=2+ demonstrated higher risks of mortality (aOR=1.709, p<0.01), MACE (aOR=1.347, p=0.04), pulmonary events (aOR=2.045, p<0.01), renal dysfunction (aOR=1.568, p<0.01), sepsis (aOR=1.587, p=0.01), bleeding events (aOR=1.429, p<0.01), wound complications (aOR=2.338, p<0.01), ischemic colitis (aOR=1.775, p=0.01), unplanned reoperation (aOR=1.445, p=0.01), operation over 4 hours (aOR=1.34, p<0.01), length of stay over 7 days (aOR=1.324, <0.01), discharge not to home (aOR=1.547, p<0.01), 30-day readmission (aOR=1.657, p=0.01). ConclusionThe mFI-5 emerges as a succinct yet effective indicator of frailty for patients undergoing OSR for AAA. Especially, a mFI-5 score of 2+ is linked with increased 30-day mortality and complications. As such, mFI-5 can be used as a valuable screening tool for frailty in patients undergoing OSR for AAA.

Follow-up compliance in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair at Veterans Affairs hospitals

ObjectiveThe Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines recommend annual imaging surveillance following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and every 5 years following open surgical repairs (OSR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Adherence to these guidelines is low outside of clinical trials, and compliance at Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals is not yet well-established. We examined imaging follow-up compliance and mortality rates after AAA repair at VA hospitals. MethodsWe queried the VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for elective infrarenal AAA repairs, EVAR and OSR, then merged in follow-up imaging and mortality information. Mortality rate over time was derived using Kaplan-Meier estimation. Generalized estimating equation with a logit link and a sandwich standard error estimate was performed to compare the probability of having annual follow-up imaging over time between procedure types and to identify variables associated with follow-up imaging for EVAR patients. ResultsOur analysis included 11,668 patients who underwent EVAR and 4507 patients who underwent OSR at VA hospitals between the years 2000 and 2019. The 30-day mortality rate for EVAR and OSR was 0.37% and 0.82%, respectively. OSR was associated with lower long-term mortality after adjusting age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification and preoperative renal failure with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.84-0.92; P < .01). Of surviving patients, the follow-up imaging rate was 69.1% by 1 year post-EVAR. The follow-up rate after 5 years was 45.6% post-EVAR compared with 63.6% post-OSR of surviving patients. A history of smoking or drinking, baseline hypertension, and known cardiac disease were independently associated with poor follow-up after EVAR. ConclusionsPatients undergoing elective open AAA repair in the VA hospital system had lower long-term mortality compared with patients who underwent endovascular repair. Compliance with post-EVAR imaging is low. Patient factors associated with poor post-EVAR imaging surveillance were smoking within the last year, excess alcohol consumption, and cardiac risk factors including hypertension, prior myocardial infarction, and congestive heart failure.

Associations of Preoperative Nutritional Status and Sarcopenia With Mortality in Patients With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm After Open and Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Retrospective Study

Objective: The effect of preoperative malnutrition and sarcopenia on outcomes in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) after open (OSR) and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EAR) are undefined. We conducted the study to address this issue in this population. DesignRetrospective observational study. SettingA large tertiary hospital. ParticipantsPatients with AAA who underwent OSR and EVAR. InterventionsEvaluation of nutritional status [Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS2002) and the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) scores], muscle size (skeletal muscle index, SMI) and postoperative parameters. Measurements and main results199 patients were reviewed from January 2020 to December 2022. Patients are categorized into group A (CONUT < 4) and group B (CONUT ≥ 4) based on whether their CONUT scores are less than 4. The mortality (P = 0.004) and the incidence of Clavien-Dindo class III complications (P = 0.007) in Group B were higher than those in group A. CONUT score was an independent risk factor for mid-term mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.329; 95% CI, 1.104-1.697; P = 0.002) and Clavien-Dindo class III complications (odds ratio [OR], 1.225; 95% CI, 1.012-1.482; P = 0.037) according to univariate and multivariate analyses, whereas NRS2002 score and sarcopenia were not. Kaplan-Meier curves showed a lower mid-term survival rate in Group B (log-rank P < 0.001). Conclusion: In patients with AAA undergoing OSR or EVAR, CONUT score ≥ 4 was associated with increased Clavien-Dindo class III complications and mortality. Preoperative nutritional status should be evaluated and optimized in this high-risk population.

Acute Intraoperative Conversion from Endovascular to Open vs Planned Open Operation for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Propensity-Score Matched Study from the American College of Surgeons NSQIP Targeted Database.

Evaluating outcomes for acute intraoperative conversion to open surgery during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) was difficult due to low incidence. This study aimed to compare 30-day outcomes between patients with acute intraoperative conversion during EVAR and planned open surgery, and to identify risk factors associated with acute conversion. Patients underwent EVAR or planned open AAA repair were identified in ACS-NSQIP targeted databases 2012-2021. Patients with acute intraoperative conversion during EVAR were selected. A 1:3 propensity-score matching was used to match demographics, baseline characteristics, surgical indications, aneurysm size and extent, and emergency cases between the conversion open and planned open groups. Thirty-day postoperative outcomes were assessed. Out of 20,566 EVAR, 177 (0.86%) had acute intraoperative conversion to open surgery. The conversion open group was matched to 504 out of 5,249 planned open patients. Conversion open and planned open groups had comparable 30-day mortality (23.43% vs 17.46%, p=0.09) and organ system complications including MACE (14.86% vs 10.71%, p=0.17), pulmonary complications (17.71% vs 24.01%, p=0.09), and renal complications (8.57% vs 11.11%, p=0.39). The conversion open group had lower bleeding requiring transfusion (48.57% vs 75.60%, p<0.01), shorter operation time (p<0.01), and shorter length of stay (p<0.01). Other postoperative outcomes did not differ. Risk factors associated with acute intraoperative conversion included ruptured aneurysm with or without hypotension. Protective factors included hypertension and aortic distal aneurysm extent. While this study does not endorse a universal "EVAR first" strategy for all patients with AAA, EVAR can be attempted first in eligible AAA patients. Even when EVAR is unsuccessful, intraoperative conversion to open surgery still appears to be safe compared to planned open repair.

Myocardial Injury after Non-Cardiac Surgery in Patients Who Underwent Open Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Retrospective Study.

Myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS) has been known to be associated with mortality in various surgical patients; however, its prognostic role in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) open repair remains underexplored. This study aimed to investigate the role of MINS as a predictor of mortality in patients who underwent AAA open repair. This retrospective study investigated 352 patients who underwent open repair for non-ruptured AAA. The predictors of 30-day and 1-year mortalities were investigated using logistic regression analysis. MINS was diagnosed in 41% of the patients after AAA open repair in this study. MINS was an independent risk factor of 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 10.440, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.278-85.274, p = 0.029) and 1-year mortality (OR: 5.189, 95% CI: 1.357-19.844, p = 0.016). Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated significantly lower overall survival rates in patients with MINS compared to those without MINS (p = 0.003). This study revealed that MINS is a common complication after AAA open repair and is an independent risk factor of 30-day and 1-year mortalities. Patients with MINS have lower overall survival rates than those without MINS.

Trends in AAA Repair in Australia Over Twenty Years.

The advent of endovascular techniques has revolutionised the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Many countries have seen a transition from open AAA repair (OAR) to endovascular AAA repair (EVAR) over the past 25 years. The only study done in Australia that describes this change was done in the private sector. Majority of healthcare in Australia is delivered through the public, universal healthcare system. The aim of this study was to evaluate the trends in AAA repair in the Australian public sector over the past two decades. The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) Procedures Data Cubes from the National Hospitals Data Collection was used to extract data pertaining to AAA repairs from 2000 to 2021. Population data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics was used to calculate incidence of each type of repair per 100,000 population. There were 65,529 AAA repairs performed in the Australian public sector from 2000 to 2021. EVARs accounted for 64.4% (42,205) and OARs accounted for 35.6% (23, 324) of them. EVAR surpassed OAR as the preferred method of AAA repair in 2006. This trend was observed in both males and females and across all age groups. There was a consistent and steady transition from OAR to EVAR over the 21 year period with EVAR surpassing OAR as the preferred method of AAA repair relatively early in Australia compared to other countries. Further research that investigates medium- and long-term outcomes of newer stent grafts is needed to further ascertain the continued viability and effectiveness of this trend in AAA treatment.

Wound healing and hernia after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair - Onlay self-gripping polyester mesh reinforcement compared with small bite sutured closure.

Prophylactic mesh implantation following open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm is a debatable subject. To assess the efficacy of a self-gripping polyester mesh used in on-lay technique to prevent incisional hernia after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 495 patients who underwent aortic surgery between May 2017 and May 2021. Patients included in the study underwent open surgical repair for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with closure of the abdominal wall with either small bite suture technique or prophylactic mesh reinforcement. Primary endpoint of the study was the occurrence of incisional hernia during a two-year follow-up period. Secondary endpoints were mesh-related complications. Mesh implantation with the on-lay technique was successful in all cases. No patient in the mesh group developed an incisional hernia during the 24-month follow-up period. Two patients in the non-mesh group developed a symptomatic incisional hernia during the follow-up period at 6 months. Three cases of post-operative access site complications were observed in the mesh group. Application of a self-gripping polyester mesh using the on-lay technique demonstrates acceptable early-durability after open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. However, it appears to be associated with a number of post-operative access site complications.

Impact of Serum Albumin Levels and Body Mass Index on Outcomes of Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Korean Population

Although obese patients seem to be susceptible to chronic diseases, obesity paradox has been observed in the field of vascular surgery, in which many previous studies have reported that overweight patients have good postoperative outcomes and underweight patients have poor postoperative outcomes. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the impact of body mass index (BMI) and serum albumin levels, which are evaluated as indicators of nutritional status, on outcomes of open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. We reviewed the vascular surgery database of a single tertiary referral center for all patients who underwent open AAA repair due to degenerative etiology from 1996 to 2021. To analyze the effect of BMI, patients were classified into 4 groups according to the Asian-Pacific classification of BMI: underweight (UW) (<18.5kg/m2), normal weight (NW) (18.5-22.9kg/m2), overweight (OW) (23-24.9kg/m2), and obese (OB) (≥25kg/m2). The χ2, Fisher's exact, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare demographics, comorbidities, radiologic findings, surgical details, and 1-year mortality rates between the 4 groups. We also compared the preoperative serum albumin levels of each group to assess nutritional status indirectly. Cox's proportional hazards model was performed to determine factors associated with mortality. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed, and the differences were analyzed by a log-rank test. We did not perform an analysis for 30-day mortality because cases of 30-day mortality in UW patients were rare due to the unbalanced distribution of the number of patients in the 4 groups. Among a total of 678 patients, 22 were classified as UW (3.2%), 200 as NW (29.5%), 183 as OW (27.1%), and 273 as OB (40.1%). The median age was 70 (64-75) years and 577 of 678 (85.1%) patients were male gender. Higher serum albumin level was associated with decreased 1-year mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15-0.63; P=0.001). UW patients had a higher 1-year mortality rate than NW patients (HR, 3.67; 95% CI, 1.02-13.18; P=0.046). OB patients had a lower overall mortality rate than NW patients (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.53-1; P=0.05). Low BMI (<18.5kg/m2) and low serum albumin level were associated with poor 1-year survival after elective open AAA repair. These patients also need more careful preoperative intervention, like weight gain or nutritional support, for better outcomes. The obesity paradox existed in our study; high BMI (≥25kg/m2) was associated with better overall survival after elective open AAA repair.

Sexual dysfunction after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: 16 years' experience in a quaternary center and literature review.

Open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair can lead to sexual dysfunction (SD) in men. To determine the prevalence of SD following open AAA repair, explore whether surgical techniques for aortic reconstruction can have a differential impact on the occurrence of SD, and summarize current knowledge in this field. Retrospective review of 100 patients submitted to open AAA repair between 1995 and 2010 in a quaternary center. Sexual dysfunction was assessed according to questions from the modified International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), considering the condition before surgical repair and 3 months after surgery. The chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and Student's t test were used for statistical analyses. 100 patients were included (mean age = 66.4 years old). Normal sexual activity, no sexual activity, erectile dysfunction, and retrograde ejaculation with preserved erectile function were found in 36%, 21%, 18%, and 24% of patients, respectively. The group of patients with no sexual activity was older (mean age = 72.3 years old vs 64.5 years old, p < 0.001). Erectile dysfunction prevalence was higher in patients submitted to an aorto-bifemoral bypass (p = 0.032). Retrograde ejaculation was more frequent in patients submitted to an aorto-aortic bypass (p = 0.007). Sexual function is a frequent condition intimately associated with the aortic reconstruction technique. The literature review found contradictory results regarding whether the endovascular approach is protective compared with open repair, but clearly demonstrated the importance of techniques targeting preservation of the internal iliac artery and the superior hypogastric plexus.

Short-term Outcomes of Elective Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

To evaluate the presentations, aetiologies, and outcomes (survival and morbidity) of patients who underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair at a tertiary care centre in a low middle-income country (LMIC). Case-series study. Place and Duration of the Study:Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan, from January 2000 till April 2022. All patients who underwent elective open repair for AAA were identified using ICD coding 10. Patients' demographics, presentations, treatment options, and outcomes were recorded on a specially designed proforma. Outcomes were measured in terms of 30-day survival and perioperative complications. Forty-two patients were included in the study. Thirty-nine (92.9%) of them were males. The mean age was 63.8 + 12.6 years. Thirty-four (81%) patients had an infrarenal aortic aneurysm. The average aneurysm diameter was 8.0 + 2.73 cm. The in-hospital survival rate was 95.2% whereas 2 (4.8%) patients had in-hospital mortality. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was the most common complication, seen in 5 (11.9%) patients. Adverse outcomes were seen more in diabetic patients whereas increased incidence of AKI was noted in operations with supra-renal clamping (p<0.05). Most patients presented with symptoms and large aneurysm size. Open AAA repair was performed safely with 4.8% in-hospital mortality and acceptable morbidity in the LMIC setting. Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, Low middle-income country.