Ono Pharma Research Articles

Overall Survival Analysis of Bevacizumab Plus Erlotinib for Advanced EGFR-Mutant Metastatic NSCLC

Overall Survival Analysis of Bevacizumab Plus Erlotinib for Advanced <i>EGFR</i>-Mutant Metastatic NSCLC

The Echelon-2 Trial: 5-Year Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study of Brentuximab Vedotin and CHP (A+CHP) Versus CHOP in Frontline Treatment of Patients with CD30-Positive Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma

The Echelon-2 Trial: 5-Year Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study of Brentuximab Vedotin and CHP (A+CHP) Versus CHOP in Frontline Treatment of Patients with CD30-Positive Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma

ARIA-EAACI statement on asthma and COVID-19 (June 2, 2020).

ARIA-EAACI statement on asthma and COVID-19 (June 2, 2020).

Abstract 4981: Comprehensive analysis of immune phenotypes identifies CD73+ CD163high macrophages as a prognostic biomarker in lung adenocarcinoma

Abstract To better understand the immune profile within the tumor microenvironment (TME) and the potential immune-evasion capacity that may arise from administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors, we investigated immunological phenotypes and their correlations with genomic alterations in order to provide predictive/prognostic implications in lung adenocarcinoma (LAC).Surgical sections with corresponding peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected from 76 patients with pathologically confirmed Ia-IIIa. The histological contents expressing immune checkpoint molecules in the tumor nest and stromal area were imaged and quantified using a multi-spectral imaging system. Distribution of tumor mutation burden (TMB) and non-synonymous somatic mutations were analyzed in whole exome sequencing (WES) data.Total 76 patients consisted of EGFR-mutant (n=37) and EGFR-wild type (n=39) tumors. As is well known, the number of tumor-infiltrating cytotoxic T cells (174.7 ± 24.4 cells/mm2) and TMB (3.8 ± 0.4) in EGFR-mutant tumors was significantly lower than those of EGFR wild type tumors (394.2 ± 82.3 cells/mm2 and 6.7 ± 1.2) (p=0.0146 and p=0.0254, respectively), elucidating EGFR mutation-mediated immune evasion. The subjects carrying EGFR wild-type were classified into two subgroups by the density of tumor-infiltrating cytotoxic T cells, defined as the high TIL (n=20) and low TIL (n=19). There was great difference of mean density of cytotoxic T cells between low TIL group (129.6 ± 16.8 cells/mm2) and high TIL group (672.8±143.5 cells/mm2). Tumor-infiltrating T cells were granzyme B-positive, suggesting most cells were tumor-specific. Interestingly, no significant difference in TMB was found between the two subgroups (7.5 ± 1.9 in low TIL group vs. 5.8±1.3 in high TIL group; p=0.4642). Tumor proportion score (TPS) of PD-L1 was remarkably higher in high TIL group than low TIL group (29.7 ± 6.5% vs. 13.9 ± 2.8%, p=0.0008, respectively), but no significant differences of tumoral CD73 and IDO between the two groups (p=0.643 and p=0.923, respectively). Even there were no significant differences in counts of tumor-infiltrating macrophages in all types of macrophage, significantly higher counts of PD-L1+ M1-type macrophages (CD68+ CD163low) in the stromal area were discovered in the high TIL group compared to those of the low TIL group (396.2 ± 93.6 vs. 139.8 ± 30.1, p=0.0114, respectively), indicating that most of macrophages resided in the stromal area. Interestingly, the low TIL group exhibited higher counts of CD73+ M2-type macrophages (CD68+ CD163high) in the stromal area than the high TIL group (644.5 ± 110.9 vs. 387.9 ± 73.2, p=0.0639, respectively). Cell count ratio (M1/M2) of macrophages was significantly higher in the high TIL group (p=0.0042), suggesting that the TME with a smaller number of TILs tends to contain more M2-type macrophages. The tumor recurrence was more frequent in the low TIL group compared to the high TIL group with no statistical significance (p=0.127). In surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma patients, the subgroup with a low density of tumor-infiltrating cytotoxic T cells had a large number of CD73+ M2-type macrophages, which may contribute to poor prognosis. Acknowledgement: This study was sponsored by Ono Pharma Co., Ltd Citation Format: Jae-Hwan Kim, Tae-Min Kim, Sung-Gu Her, Kyoung-Ho Pyo, Jeong- Oh Kim, Beung-Chul Ahn, Byoung Chul Cho, Jin Hyoung Kang. Comprehensive analysis of immune phenotypes identifies CD73+ CD163high macrophages as a prognostic biomarker in lung adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 4981.

519P - Initial results of lung cancer genomic screening project for individualized medicine in Asia: LC-SCRUM-Asia

BackgroundLC-SCRUM was established in 2013 to screen target genes in lung cancer to advance the development of new molecular targeted drugs and diagnostics. To date, with the cooperation of over 200 institutions across Japan, LC-SCRUM has performed genomic analysis of over 7000 lung cancer patients. Since Mar 2019, LC-SCRUM has expanded to Taiwan as genomic screening infrastructure with the cooperation of Asian countries. Here, we report initial results of Asian international genomic screening, LC-SCRUM-Asia. MethodsTumor samples of non-small cell lung cancer patients were analyzed for oncogenic alterations using targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) with Oncomine Comprehensive Assay. The analysis was performed as central test at CLIA lab in Japan. ResultsAs of May 31th in 2019, the LC-SCRUM-Asia has the participation of 5 institutions in Taiwan and 161 in Japan. For the first 2 month, a total of 477 patients (23 from Taiwan and 454 from Japan) were enrolled in this study. Median age were 68 years (range, 45-84) in Taiwan cohort and 67 (28-87) in Japan. In Taiwan 65% of patients were women, 70% adenocarcinoma and 70% non-smoker, and in Japan 37% of patients were women, 79% adenocarcinoma and 29% non-smoker, respectively. Of 13 analyzable patients in Taiwan, targeted NGS showed that 9 (69%) had at least one targetable oncogenic alterations, including 4 EGFR mut, 2 KRAS mut, 2 ALK fusinos and 1 RET fusions plus EGFR mut. Of 423 patients in Japan, 196 (46%) had at least one targetable oncogenic alterations. Oncogenic alterations commonly found were EGFR mut (19%), KRAS mut (13%), ALK fusions (2%), RET fusions (1%) and others in Japan. ConclusionsAsian international genomic screening can be implemented between Taiwan and Japan settings. LC-SCRUM-Asia will contribute to further development of precision medicine for lung cancer patients in Asia. Updated results will be presented at the meeting. Legal entity responsible for the studyLC-SCRUM-Asia. FundingAstraZeneca, Ignyta, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Taiho, Takeda, Merck Serono, Novartis, MSD, Pfizer, Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Boehringer Ingelheim, Astellas, LOXO, Janssen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Ono. DisclosureC-H.S. Kuo: Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Boehringer Ingelheim; Honoraria (self): Roche; Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): Eli Lilly; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Honoraria (self): ONO Pharma; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: Chugai; Advisory / Consultancy: Takeda. K. Yoh: Honoraria (self): Chugai; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Taiho; Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD; Honoraria (self): Novartis. Y. Zenke: Honoraria (self): Boehringer Ingelheim; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Lilly; Honoraria (self): Chugai; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD; Honoraria (self): Taiho; Honoraria (self): Ono pharmaceutical. S. Matsumoto: Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck Serono; Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Chugai Pharma. K. Goto: Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Lilly; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Chugai; Research grant / Funding (institution): Ignyta; Research grant / Funding (institution): Kyowa Hakko Kirin; Research grant / Funding (institution): Daiichi Sankyo; Research grant / Funding (institution): Eisai; Research grant / Funding (institution): Taiho; Research grant / Funding (institution): Takeda; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck Serono; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Research grant / Funding (institution): Boehringer Ingelheim; Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas; Research grant / Funding (institution): LOXO; Research grant / Funding (institution): Janssen; Research grant / Funding (institution): Thermo Fisher Scientific; Research grant / Funding (institution): Ono. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

1478O - Results of the ASCEND-7 phase II study evaluating ALK inhibitor (ALKi) ceritinib in patients (pts) with ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) metastatic to the brain

1478O - Results of the ASCEND-7 phase II study evaluating ALK inhibitor (ALKi) ceritinib in patients (pts) with ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) metastatic to the brain

1473P - First-line ceritinib versus chemotherapy in patients (pts) with advanced ALK rearranged (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ASCEND-4 Asian subgroup analysis

BackgroundIn global phase III ASCEND-4 study (NCT01283516), ceritinib 750mg/day (fasted), demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS by BIRC (median, 16.6 mos [95% CI: 12.6, 27.2] vs 8.1 mos [95% CI: 5.8, 11.1]; HR=0.55; p<0.001) compared to chemotherapy (pemetrexed 500mg/m2 + cisplatin 75mg/m2 or carboplatin AUC 5-6, followed by pemetrexed maintenance) in untreated pts with advanced ALK+ NSCLC. Here, we report the efficacy and safety of ceritinib in Asian pts from ASCEND-4 study. MethodsPts with stage IIIB/IV, ALK+(centrally tested IHC), nonsquamous NSCLC, ≥1 measurable lesion per RECIST v1.1, and WHO PS 0–2 were eligible. Efficacy and safety were evaluated in Asian pts who had not received prior systemic anticancer therapy except neo-/adjuvant therapy. Data cutoff: June 24, 2016. ResultsAmong 376 pts randomized (1:1) in the study, 158 pts were Asian, with 76 in ceritinib arm and 82 in chemotherapy arm. Of these, 25 pts (32.9%) in ceritinib arm and 21 (25.6%) in chemotherapy arm had brain metastases at baseline. Median duration of treatment exposure: 64.5 wks (ceritinib, N=76) and 35.0 wks (chemotherapy, N=75). Median duration from randomization to data cutoff: 18.3 mos. Ceritinib demonstrated superior PFS by BIRC (median, 26.3 mos; 95% CI: 8.6, NE; HR=0.66) compared to chemotherapy (Table). Most common (≥50%; all grades; all-causality) AEs in ceritinib arm: diarrhea (85.5%), ALT increased (73.7%), vomiting (73.7%), AST increased (69.7%), and nausea (69.7%). Incidence of grade 3/4 AEs was <6%, except ALT increased (38.2%), GGT increased (22.4%), AST increased (21.1%), fatigue (7.9%), amylase increased (6.6%), and hyperglycemia (6.6%). Only 7 pts (9.2%) discontinued ceritinib due to AEs.Table1473PTableBy BIRC (N*=158)Ceritinib 750mg N=76Chemotherapy N=82Overall response rate (ORR), % [95% CI]65.8 [54.0, 76.3]29.3 [19.7, 40.4]Best overall response, n (%) Complete response (CR) Partial response (PR) Stable disease (SD) Progressive disease (PD) Non-CR/Non-PD Unknown0 50 (65.8) 11 (14.5) 11 (14.5) 2 (2.6) 2 (2.6)0 24 (29.3) 38 (46.3) 6 (7.3) 3 (3.7) 11 (13.4)Disease control rate (DCR), % [95% CI]82.9 [72.5, 90.6]79.3 [68.9, 87.4]M‡=50M‡=24Median DOR, months [95% CI]NE [24.7, NE]16.4 [7.8, NE]n/N (%)14/50 (28.0)8/24 (33.3)% Event-free probability estimates [95% CI]9 months81.2 [67.0, 89.8]76.1 [48.0, 90.4]12 months79.0 [64.5, 88.1]50.8 [22.5, 73.5]15 months70.4 [54.0, 81.9]50.8 [22.5, 73.5]Median PFS, months [95% CI]26.3 [8.6, NE]10.6 [6.7, 15.0]n/N (%)32/76 (42.1)45/82 (54.9)% Event-free probability estimates [95% CI]9 months61.0 [48.4, 71.5]54.7 [41.8, 65.8]12 months61.0 [48.4, 71.5]49.8 [37.1, 61.2]15 months55.9 [43.2, 66.9]39.0 [26.9, 51.0]*Total number of patients included in the full analysis set.‡Total number of patients with confirmed complete response or partial response. n: Total number of events included in the analysis. N: Total number of patients included in the analysis. ConclusionsIn Asian pts with ALK+ NSCLC, ceritinib demonstrated durable and clinically meaningful efficacy and a safety profile consistent with overall ASCEND-4 study results. Clinical trial identificationNCT01828099. Editorial acknowledgementShilpa Garg, Novartis Healthcare Pvt Ltd. Legal entity responsible for the studyNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. FundingNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. DisclosureD.S. Tan: Honoraria (self): Merck, Pfizer, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Takeda; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, AstraZeneca, Eli-lily, Loxo; Research grant / Funding (self): Novartis, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Bayer, Pfizer; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Merck, Pfizer, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche,Takeda. S. Geater: Advisory / Consultancy: Boehringer Ingelheim; Honoraria (institution): AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca, Roche, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim; Full / Part-time employment: Prince of Songkla Univerisity. C.J. Yu: Honoraria (self): Roche, AstraZeneca, Ono pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche, AstraZeneca, Ono pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim. T.C. Hsia: Advisory / Consultancy: Norvatis, Lilly, AZ, Roche local speaker. M.C. Lin: Advisory / Consultancy: AZ, Novartis, BI, Roche. V. Sriuranpong: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca, Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, Eisai, Boehringer, Taiho, MSD, BMS, Amgen; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca, Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, Boehringer, Eisai, Taiho, Lilly, MSD. P. Sen: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Novartis. F. Branle: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Novartis. M. Shi: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Novartis stock; Full / Part-time employment: Novartis. Y.L. Wu: Honoraria (self): AZ, Roche, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, MSD, BMS, BI; Advisory / Consultancy: AZ, Roche, BI; Research grant / Funding (institution): AZ, Roche. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

390O - Efficacy and safety of ceritinib in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with leptomeningeal metastases (LM): Results from the phase II, ASCEND-7 study

390O - Efficacy and safety of ceritinib in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with leptomeningeal metastases (LM): Results from the phase II, ASCEND-7 study

LBA45 - Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) impact of pembrolizumab (P) versus chemotherapy (C) as first-line (1L) treatment in PD-L1–positive advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma

LBA45 - Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) impact of pembrolizumab (P) versus chemotherapy (C) as first-line (1L) treatment in PD-L1–positive advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma

1544P - The safety assessment of crizotinib and alectinib from real-world data of 840 ALK-inhibitor naïve patients with NSCLC harboring ALK-rearrangement (WJOG9516L)

1544P - The safety assessment of crizotinib and alectinib from real-world data of 840 ALK-inhibitor naïve patients with NSCLC harboring ALK-rearrangement (WJOG9516L)

747P - A phase Ib trial of lenvatinib (LEN) plus pembrolizumab (PEMBRO) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC): Updated results

747P - A phase Ib trial of lenvatinib (LEN) plus pembrolizumab (PEMBRO) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC): Updated results

Thrombolysis with Alteplase at 0·6 mg/kg for Acute FLAIR-Negative Stroke with Unknown Time of Onset: THAWS Randomized Controlled Trial

Thrombolysis with Alteplase at 0·6 mg/kg for Acute FLAIR-Negative Stroke with Unknown Time of Onset: THAWS Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomised Phase II Study of Palbociclib Plus Exemestane with GnRH Agonist Versus Capecitabine in Premenopausal Women with Hormone Receptor-Positive HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer

Background: Endocrine treatment is preferred recommendation by clinical guidelines in premenopausal as well as postmenopausal women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In real-world clinical practice, however, substantial numbers of patients are treated with chemotherapy in earlier lines The purpose of this phase II study was to compare the clinical antitumor activity and safety of combined therapy with exemestane plus gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist plus palbociclib with that of capecitabine in premenopausal women with HR-positive, HER2-negative MBC. Methods: This was a prospective, two-arm, randomized, multicenter open-label phase II study. Participants were premenopausal women with breast cancer that had relapsed or progressed during prior tamoxifen. One line of previous chemotherapy for metastatic setting was allowed. Patients were randomized to chemotherapy (capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 twice daily for 2 weeks every 3 weeks) or combination endocrine therapy (exemestane 25 mg/day for 28 days and palbociclib 125 mg/day for 21 days every 4 weeks plus leuprolide). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Findings: Of 189 patients enrolled between 2015 and 2018 from 14 centers, 184 were randomly assigned to chemotherapy (n=92) or endocrine therapy with palbociclib (n=92). Median age was 44 years (range 28–58). Approximately half the patients (51%) were treatment naive for MBC. During a median 17 months of followup, median PFS was superior for endocrine therapy plus palbociclib than for capecitabine [20·1 vs. 14·4 months, p=0·0469 by log-rank test; hazard ratio 0·659 (95 CI 0·437–0·994)]. Hematological toxicities of ≥ grade 3 were significantly more common with palbociclib than with capecitabine (75·0% vs. 16·3%). Diarrhea (12·0% vs. 38·4%) and hand–foot syndrome (1% vs. 77%) were more common with capecitabine. Interpretation: Exemestane plus palbociclib with ovarian suppression showed clinical benefit in terms of PFS compared with capecitabine in premenopausal patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative MBC. Trial Registration: The ClinicalTrials.gov identifier number was NCT02592746. Funding Statement: This study was supported by Pfizer (exemestane, palbociclib), Shinpoong (capecitabine), Daewoong Korea and Takeda (leuprolide) for study drugs. This work was partly funded by a grant from the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (HA17C0055) and by the National R&D Program for Cancer Control, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (1720150). Declaration of Interests: Dr. PARK reports grants and non-financial support from Pfizer, grants and non-financial support from AstraZeneca, grants and non-financial support from Novartis, grants and non-financial support from Merck, grants from Eisai, grants and non-financial support from Roche, outside the submitted work. Dr. Im reports grants from Pfizer, drug supply from Pfizer, Shinpoong, Daewoong, and Dakeda, during the conduct of the study; grants from AstraZeneca and Pfizer, travel expenses for advisory board participation and advisory role for Novartis, advisory role for Hanmi, Pfizer, Eisai, Amgen, Lilly, MediPacto, Roche, outside the submitted work. Dr. Jung reports personal fees from AstraZeneca Korea, personal fees from Roche Korea, outside the submitted work. Dr. Kim reports grants from Ono Pharma Korea Co., Ltd., outside the submitted work. Dr. Ahn reports personal fees and non-financial support from Astrazeneca, Roche, Beringer Ingelheim, Menarini, Pfizer, BMS, ONO, Boryung, grants from Samyang, outside the submitted work. Dr. Lee reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Bayer, personal fees from Eisai, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Ono, personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Samsung Bioepis, outside the submitted work. Dr. Kim reports grants from Novarts, grants from Sanofi Genzyme, non-financial support from Dongkook Pharma Co Ltd., outside the submitted work. Dr. Ahn reports personal fees from Amgen, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Menarini, personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Eisai, personal fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, personal fees from BMS-Ono, personal fees from MSD, personal fees from Janssen, personal fees from Samsung Bioepis, personal fees from Takeda, outside the submitted work. All other authors declare they have no conflicts of interest. Ethics Approval Statement: The study was conducted in full accordance with the guidelines for Good Clinical Practice and the Declaration of Helsinki, and was approved by the institutional ethics committees of each hospital and the KCSG institutional review board. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant.

Efficacy and Safety of Temelimab, an Antibody Antagonist of the Human Endogenous Retrovirus Type-W env Protein, in Participants with Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Double-Blind, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2b Clinical Trial

Efficacy and Safety of Temelimab, an Antibody Antagonist of the Human Endogenous Retrovirus Type-W env Protein, in Participants with Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Double-Blind, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2b Clinical Trial

Possibility of a Risk-Adapted Treatment Strategy for Untreated Aggressive Adult T-Cell Leukemia-Lymphoma (ATL) Based on the ATL Prognostic Index: A Supplementary Analysis of the JCOG9801 Study

Possibility of a Risk-Adapted Treatment Strategy for Untreated Aggressive Adult T-Cell Leukemia-Lymphoma (ATL) Based on the ATL Prognostic Index: A Supplementary Analysis of the JCOG9801 Study

DS-3201, a Potent EZH1/2 Dual Inhibitor, Demonstrates Antitumor Activity Against Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) Regardless of EZH2 Mutation

Enhancer of zests homologous (EZH)1 and its close homolog EZH2 are component of polycomb repressive complex (PRC) 2 protein complex, and play redundant and crucial role for the maintenance of transcriptional repression by tri-methylating histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27). Hyper tri-methylation of H3K27 has been associated with lymphoma and myeloma progression, suggesting that PRC2 is a therapeutic target for hematological malignancies. Selective EZH2 inhibitors induce compensatory activation of EZH1 which in turn re-activates PRC2 function. We hypothesized that dual inhibition of EZH1 and EZH2 is more effective than selective EZH2 inhibition as anti-tumor therapy.We have developed a novel EZH1 and EZH2 dual inhibitor DS-3201, which simultaneously inhibited the enzymatic activity of EZH1 and EZH2 in nano-molar concentration. DS-3201 showed anti-proliferative effect against various NHL cells, such as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), mantle cell lymphoma, and peripheral T-cell lymphoma, with GI50 values less than 100 nM regardless of EZH2 gain-of-function mutations. DS-3201 also induced differentiation of undifferentiated NHL cells with increment of cell lineage specific markers and which induced cell death in vitro. DS-3201 also showed synergistic effect with the standard of care agents for NHL in vitro and in vivo.An open-label phase 1 clinical study was initiated to examine the safety and pharmacokinetics of multiple-dose monotherapy of DS-3201b which is the salt form of DS-3201 in patients with NHL (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02732275). Eighteen patients with relapsed or refractory NHL were enrolled. The patients received oral administration of DS-3201b once daily in a 28-day cycle at dose of 150, 200 and 300 mg. Preliminary efficacy results (D. Maruyama, et al. ASH 2017), showed that the overall response rate was 58.8% (10/17) with 1 complete response and 9 partial responses (PR). Thirteen NHL patients including five follicular lymphoma (FL) and one DLBCL were analyzed for gene mutation status by targeted gene sequencing. EZH2 mutation was detected only in one FL patient, who achieved PR. It was suggested that DS-3201b has clinical activity against NHL, regardless of the mutation status of EZH2. DisclosuresHonma:Daiichi Sankyo: Employment. Nosaka:Daiichi Sankyo: Employment. Shiroishi:Daiichi Sankyo: Employment. Takata:Daiichi Sankyo: Employment. Hama:Daiichi Sankyo: Employment. Yamamoto:Daiichi Sankyo RD Novare: Employment. Adachi:Daiichi Sankyo: Employment. Maruyama:Mundipharma International: Honoraria, Research Funding; MSD: Honoraria, Research Funding; Chugai Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Dai-ichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Biomedis International: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Honoraria, Research Funding; Fujifilm: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ono Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Eisai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Dai-Nippon-Sumitomo: Honoraria; Asahi Kasei Pharma: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Solasia Pharma: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Otsuka: Research Funding; Amgen Astellas BioPharma: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Zenyaku Kogyo: Honoraria, Research Funding. Tobinai:Chugai Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ono Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Eisai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; SERVIER: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Zenyaku Kogyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; HUYA Bioscience International: Consultancy, Honoraria. Ishida:Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co.Ltd: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene K.K: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer AG: Research Funding; Mundiparma K: Honoraria. Kusumoto:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd: Honoraria, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Honoraria, Research Funding. Tsukasaki:Daiich-Sankyo: Consultancy; Ono Pharma: Consultancy; HUYA: Consultancy, Research Funding; Chugai Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Mundy Pharma: Honoraria; Kyowa-hakko/Kirin: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Fujioka:Daiichi Sankyo: Employment. Watanabe:Daiichi Sankyo: Employment. Kanno:Daiichi Sankyo: Employment. Kumazawa:Daiichi Sankyo RD Novare: Employment. Fujitani:Daiichi Sankyo: Employment. Araki:Daiichi Sankyo: Employment. Fujiwara:Daiichi Sankyo: Employment.

Randomized Phase II/III Study of Standard R-CHOP Versus CHOP Combined with Dose-Dense Weekly Rituximab (RW-CHOP) for Previously Untreated DLBCL: JCOG0601

Randomized Phase II/III Study of Standard R-CHOP Versus CHOP Combined with Dose-Dense Weekly Rituximab (RW-CHOP) for Previously Untreated DLBCL: JCOG0601

The ECHELON-2 Trial: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Phase 3 Study of Brentuximab Vedotin and CHP (A+CHP) Versus CHOP in the Frontline Treatment of Patients with CD30+ Peripheral T-Cell Lymphomas

The ECHELON-2 Trial: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Phase 3 Study of Brentuximab Vedotin and CHP (A+CHP) Versus CHOP in the Frontline Treatment of Patients with CD30+ Peripheral T-Cell Lymphomas

LBA9 - IMpower150: An exploratory analysis of efficacy outcomes in patients with EGFR mutations

LBA9 - IMpower150: An exploratory analysis of efficacy outcomes in patients with EGFR mutations

PLCG2 Protective Variant p.P522R Modulates Tau Pathology and Disease Progression in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment

Background: A rare coding variant (rs72824905, p.P522R) conferring protection against the susceptibility to Alzheimer's disease (AD) was recently identified in the gene encoding the enzyme phospholipase-C-γ2 (PLCG2). Here, we explore the protective nature of this variant with regard to AD pathology indicated by biomarkers, cognitive decline, and potential underlying biological mechanisms. Methods: Association of p.P522R with CSF levels of pTau181, total Tau and Aβ1-42 was assessed in 1,282 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or AD-dementia syndrome. In addition, the association with longitudinal cognitive decline was tested in 3,010 MCI patients from memory clinic cohorts and 10,100 individuals from population-based studies using latent process linear mixed models. Finally, unsupervised co-trans-regulatory network analysis and biological experiments were conducted. Findings: Carriers of the p.P522R variant showed lower pTau181 levels in CSF compared to non-carriers, specifically in the presence of amyloid pathology. In MCI patients but not in population-based cohorts, the p.P522R variant was associated with slower cognitive decline with an effect size similar to that of APOE-e4. We identified a network of coregulated proteins linking PLCG2 to APOE and TREM2. Finally, in vitro experiments confirmed that inflammasome activation upon phospholipase C stimulation might act downstream of PLCG2. Implication: Our data link the protective effect of p.P522R in PLCG2 to reduced Tau pathology, to a slower cognitive decline in MCI patients and to underlying inflammatory processes. Therapies targeting the enzyme PLCG2 might provide a therapeutic approach for AD. Funding Statement: EU Joint Programme Neurodegenerative Disease Research, Innovative Medicines Initiative 2, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, La Caixa, Grifols SA, German Federal Ministry of Research and Education, Sanofi Laboratories, Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale, Fondation Plan Alzheimer, Stichting Alzheimer Nederland, Stichting VUmc fonds, Netherlands Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports, Directorate of Long-Term Care, Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), EMGO+ Research Institute. Declaration of Interests: All authors report no conflict of interest. PL received consultation and/or lecture honoraria from IBL International, Fujirebio Europe, AJ Roboscreen, and Roche. JW received honoraria for consulting activities, lectures or advisory board participation from Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Hoffmann-La-Roche, MSD Sharp + Dome, Janssen-Cilag GmbH, Immungenetics AG, Boehringer Ingelheim. LF received honoraria for consulting activities, lectures or advisory board participation from Allergan, Eli Lilly, Avraham Pharmaceuticals, Axon Neuroscience, Axovant, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eisai, Functional Neuromodulation, Lundbeck, MerckSharpe & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Pharnext, Roche, Schwabe Pharma; he served on Data and Safety Monitoring boards or endpoint committees with Avraham Pharmaceuticals, Axon Neuroscience, Forschungszentrum Julich, Novartis, Pharmatropix. JP received honoraria for consulting activities, lectures or advisory board participation from Fujirebio Europe, Ono Pharma, Eli Lilly, and Nestle Institute of Health Sciences. ARu reports consulting Fees: Landsteiner Genmed, Grifols, Araclon biotech. And Lecture Fees: Araclon Biotech.PA reports personal fees from Servier, Total, Genoscreen, Takeda, Foundation Alzheimer. OP received research funding, consultancy fees or speech honoraria from Axovant, Biogen, Genentech, Lilly, Lundbeck, Novartis, Pharmatrophix, Piramal, Probiodrug, Roche, Takeda and TauRx Pharmaceuticals. MB receives fees or has received for consulting from Lab. Servier, Roche, Lilly, Avid, Bayer, Elan, Janssen, Neuroptix, Sanofi. She receives or has received fees for lectures from Lilly, Nutricia, Roche, Schwabe, Araclon, Esteve, Grifols, Janssen, Novartis, Piramal, Pfizer-Wyett, Servier. She receives fees for being part of the Advisory Board of Lilly and Schwabe. She reports grants/research funding from Abbvie, Araclon, Biogen Research Limited, Bioiberica, Grifols, Lilly, S.A, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Laboratorios Servier, Nutricia SRL, Oryzon Genomics, Piramal Imaging Limited, Roche Pharma SA, and Schwabe Farma iberica SLU, all outside the submitted work. She has not received personal compensations from these organizations Ethics Approval Statement: The individual studies were approved by the respective ethics committees.