You have accessJournal of UrologyBladder Cancer: Non-invasive I1 Apr 2015MP26-18 MULTI-ISTITUTIONAL CONTROLLED STUDIES DO NO REFLECT THE PATIENT'S COMPLIANCE TO BCG ENCOUNTERED IN CLINICAL PRACTICE. RESULTS ON 411 PATIENTS Vincenzo Serretta, Cristina Scalici Gesolfo, Vincenza Alonge, Fabrizio Di Maida, Lorenzo Rocchini, Marco Moschini, Andrea Gallina, and Renzo Colombo Vincenzo SerrettaVincenzo Serretta More articles by this author , Cristina Scalici GesolfoCristina Scalici Gesolfo More articles by this author , Vincenza AlongeVincenza Alonge More articles by this author , Fabrizio Di MaidaFabrizio Di Maida More articles by this author , Lorenzo RocchiniLorenzo Rocchini More articles by this author , Marco MoschiniMarco Moschini More articles by this author , Andrea GallinaAndrea Gallina More articles by this author , and Renzo ColomboRenzo Colombo More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.1140AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES BCG maintenance for at least one year is advocated by urological guidelines as the best intravesical regimen in high-risk non muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), conservatively treated. Noteworthy, a relevant percentage of patients does not complete the planned treatment. The aim of this study was to analyze the reasons for treatment interruption and low compliance. METHODS Consecutive patients affected by T1HG NMIBC undergoing conservative management with adjuvant BCG entered the study. The Connaught BCG strain was administered intravesically according to the South West Oncology Group schedule for one year, 81mg diluted in 50 ml of saline solution, starting 21-30 days after TUR. Toxicity and causes of treatment interruption were recorded. RESULTS Between 2000 and 2012, intravesical BCG with 1-year maintenance regimen was proposed to 411 patients. Out of them, 380 (92,5%) completed the induction cycle and 308 (81%) started the maintenance. A total of 215 (52.3%) completed the scheduled one-year treatment. Toxicity requiring treatment interruption was recorded in 25 (6.1%) patients only. In 60 patients (14.6%) a delay of one or more instillations was necessary. Grade-I toxicity, not requiring therapy interruption or delay, was recorded in 193 (46.9%) cases. In our experience, the patient's compliance registered during the induction cycle reached 92%, confirming the low toxicity and the good patients' acceptance of the 6-week induction. However, between the end of the induction course and the first maintenance instillation, 50 patients (13%) became reluctant to treatment for many personal reasons unrelated to toxicity and 22 (6%) were excluded for suspicious bladder lesion at cystoscopy. Moreover, patients' compliance to maintenance decreased from 81% at 3 months to 56.6% at 12 months. Surprisingly, the rate of drop-out (15%) remained stable at 6 and 12 months. Mild toxicity and social discomfort were the mean reasons for dropout during maintenance (60%). CONCLUSIONS Severe toxicity caused BCG interruption in a limited amount of cases. Almost 60% of treatment interruptions was attributable to low grade toxicity, inadequately considered by the urologists. The personal difficulties related to the prolonged treatment and the limited patients' awareness of the therapeutic value of maintenance were other important reasons. A structured periodical counseling and a timely recognition and therapy of mild but persistent symptoms, might significantly ameliorate patients' acceptance of BCG maintenance. © 2015 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 193Issue 4SApril 2015Page: e300 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2015 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Vincenzo Serretta More articles by this author Cristina Scalici Gesolfo More articles by this author Vincenza Alonge More articles by this author Fabrizio Di Maida More articles by this author Lorenzo Rocchini More articles by this author Marco Moschini More articles by this author Andrea Gallina More articles by this author Renzo Colombo More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract