Combination Of Oncolytic Viruses Research Articles

Revolutionizing Cancer Treatment: Unleashing the Power of Combining Oncolytic Viruses with CAR-T Cells.

Oncolytic Viruses (OVs) have emerged as a promising treatment option for cancer thanks to their significant research potential and encouraging results. These viruses exert a profound impact on the tumor microenvironment, making them effective against various types of cancer. In contrast, the efficacy of Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy in treating solid tumors is relatively low. The combination of OVs and CAR-T cell therapy, however, is a promising area of research. OVs play a crucial role in enhancing the tumor-suppressive microenvironment, which in turn enables CAR-T cells to function efficiently in the context of solid malignancies. This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the benefits and drawbacks of OV therapy and CAR-T cell therapy, with a focus on the potential of combining these two treatment approaches.

Simultaneous Expression of Different Therapeutic Genes by Infection with Multiple Oncolytic HSV-1 Vectors.

Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are anti-cancer therapeutics combining the selective killing of cancer cells with the triggering of an anti-tumoral immune response. The latter effect can be improved by arming OVs with immunomodulatory factors. Due to the heterogeneity of cancer and the tumor microenvironment, it is anticipated that strategies based on the co-expression of multiple therapeutic molecules that interfere with different features of the target malignancy will be more effective than mono-therapies. Here, we show that (i) the simultaneous expression of different proteins in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells can be achieved through their infection with a combination of OVs based on herpes simplex virus type 1 (oHSV1), each encoding a single transgene. (ii) The level of expressed proteins is dependent on the number of infectious viral particles utilized to challenge tumor cells. (iii) All recombinant viruses exhibited comparable efficacy in the killing of TNBC cells in single and multiple infections and showed similar kinetics of replication. Overall, our results suggest that a strategy based on co-infection with a panel of oHSV1s may represent a promising combinatorial therapeutic approach for TNBC, as well as for other types of solid tumors, that merits further investigation in more advanced in vitro and in vivo models.

Oncolytic Virotherapy: A New Paradigm in Cancer Immunotherapy.

Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are emerging as potential treatment options for cancer. Natural and genetically engineered viruses exhibit various antitumor mechanisms. OVs act by direct cytolysis, the potentiation of the immune system through antigen release, and the activation of inflammatory responses or indirectly by interference with different types of elements in the tumor microenvironment, modification of energy metabolism in tumor cells, and antiangiogenic action. The action of OVs is pleiotropic, and they show varied interactions with the host and tumor cells. An important impediment in oncolytic virotherapy is the journey of the virus into the tumor cells and the possibility of its binding to different biological and nonbiological vectors. OVs have been demonstrated to eliminate cancer cells that are resistant to standard treatments in many clinical trials for various cancers (melanoma, lung, and hepatic); however, there are several elements of resistance to the action of viruses per se. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the combination of OVs with other standard treatment modalities, such as chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapies, and cellular therapies, to increase the response rate. This review provides a comprehensive update on OVs, their use in oncolytic virotherapy, and the future prospects of this therapy alongside the standard therapies currently used in cancer treatment.

Personalizing Oncolytic Immunovirotherapy Approaches.

Development of successful cancer therapeutics requires exploration of the differences in genetics, metabolism, and interactions with the immune system among malignant and normal cells. The clinical observation of spontaneous tumor regression following natural infection with microorganismhas created the premise of their use as cancer therapeutics. Oncolytic viruses (OVs) originate from viruses with attenuated virulence in humans, well-characterized vaccine strains of known human pathogens, or engineered replication-deficient viral vectors. Their selectivity is based on receptor expression level and postentry restriction factors that favor replication in the tumor, while keeping the normal cells unharmed. Clinical trials have demonstrated a wide range of patient responses to virotherapy, with subgroups of patients significantly benefiting from OV administration. Tumor-specific gene signatures, including antiviral interferon-stimulated gene (ISG) expression profile, have demonstrated a strong correlation with tumor permissiveness to infection. Furthermore, the combination of OVs with immunotherapeutics, including anticancer vaccines and immune checkpoint inhibitors [ICIs, such as anti-PD-1/PD-L1 or anti-CTLA-4 and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T or CAR-NK cells], could synergistically improve the therapeutic outcome. Creating response prediction algorithms represents an important step for the transition to individualized immunovirotherapy approaches in the clinic. Integrative predictors couldinclude tumor mutational burden (TMB), inflammatory gene signature, phenotype of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, tumor microenvironment (TME), and immune checkpoint receptor expression on both immune and target cells. Additionally, the gut microbiota has recently been recognized as a systemic immunomodulatory factor and could further be used in the optimization of individualized immunovirotherapy algorithms.

Interleukin-2 and Oncolytic Virotherapy: A New Perspective in Cancer Therapy.

By triggering immune responses in malignancies that have generally been linked to poor outcomes, immunotherapy has recently shown effectiveness. On the other hand, tumors provide an environment for cells that influence the body's immunity against cancer. Malignant cells also express large amounts of soluble or membrane-bound ligands and immunosuppressive receptors. In this regard, the combination of oncolytic viruses with pro-inflammatory or inflammatory cytokines, including IL-2, can be a potential therapy for some malignancies. Indeed, oncolytic viruses cause the death of cancerous cells and destroy the tumor microenvironment. They result in the local release of threat signals and antigens associated with tumors. As a result, it causes lymphocyte activity and the accumulation of antigenpresenting cells which causes them to accumulate in the tumor environment and release cytokines and chemokines. In this study, we reviewed the functions of IL-2 as a crucial type of inflammatory cytokine in triggering immune responses, as well as the effect of its release and increased expression following combination therapy with oncolytic viruses in the process of malignant progression, as an essential therapeutic approach that should be taken into consideration going forward.

Combination oncolytic virus, radiation therapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment in anti-PD-1-refractory cancer

BackgroundImmunotherapies are becoming front-line treatments for many advanced cancers, and combinations of two or more therapies are beginning to be investigated. Based on their individual antitumor capabilities, we sought to...

Adenovirotherapy delivering cross-hybrid IgGA Fc engineering PD-L1 inhibitors for enhanced cancer immunotherapy

Adenovirotherapy delivering cross-hybrid IgGA Fc engineering PD-L1 inhibitors for enhanced cancer immunotherapy

Comprehensive Overview of CAR-T Cell Therapy, Engineering Process and Future Prospects

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy is a revolutionary treatment method which applies the technology of modifying patients’ immune T cells to eliminate cancer cells. The immune system recognizes invading cells by noticing antigens on the foreign cells. The receptors of T cells bind to the antigens which notifies the rest of the immune system to eradicate the foreign invaders. CAR-T cell therapy has gained achievement in the treatment of hematologic malignancies such as B-ALL. CAR-T cell engineering process contains four steps including leukapheresis and the expression of the CAR on the T cells. Among the process, the Sleeping Beauty transposon system shortens the time between genetic modification and infusion so that patients can receive the modified T cells on site. GMP (Good Manufacture Practice) also ensures quality and safety of the CAR-T cells before infusing into the patients. CAR-T cells damage tumor cells by three major pathways. T cells utilize perforin and granzyme to lyse open antigen-positive tumor cells and use Fas and Fas ligand to target antigen-negative tumor cells. The derivation of cytokines from CAR-T cells sensitizes the tumor stroma and enhances tumor killing ability. The development in CAR-T cell designs has made a huge contribution to the success of the treatment where five generations of CAR-T cells have already been investigated. However, there are still some challenges associated with the treatment such as antigen escape relapse and on-target off-tumor toxicities observed in solid tumors. The technology can be further innovated by overcoming antigen escape loss, enhancing safety of CAR-T cells, and improving the persistence of CAR-T cells using the combination of oncolytic viruses with CAR-T cells. This review mainly focuses on the CAR-T cell engineering process and killing mechanisms as well as some obstacles and potential improvement for the technology.

A Dual-Responsive STAT3 Inhibitor Nanoprodrug Combined with Oncolytic Virus Elicits Synergistic Antitumor Immune Responses by Igniting Pyroptosis.

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy shows excellent efficacy against malignancies; however, insufficient tumor immunogenicity and the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) are considered as the two major stumbling blocks to a broad ICB response. Here, a combinational therapeutic strategy is reported, wherein TME-reactive oxygen species/pH dual-responsive signal transducers and activators of transcription 3 inhibitor nanoprodrugs MPNPs are combined with oncolytic herpes simplex virus 1 virotherapy to synergistically ignite pyroptosis for enhancing immunotherapy. MPNPs exhibit a certain level of tumor accumulation, reduce tumor cell stemness, and enhance antitumor immune responses. Furthermore, the simultaneous application of oncolytic viruses (OVs) confers MPNPs with higher tumor penetration capacity and remarkable gasdermin-E-mediated pyroptosis, thereby reshaping the TME and transforming "cold" tumors into "hot" ones. This "fire of immunity" strategy successfully activates robust T-cell-dependent antitumor responses, potentiating ICB effects against local recurrence and pulmonary metastasis in preclinical "cold" murine triple-negative breast cancer and syngeneic oral cancer models. Collectively, this work may pave a new way and offer an unprecedented opportunity for the combination of OVs with nanomedicine for cancer immunotherapy.

Design Strategies and Precautions for Using Vaccinia Virus in Tumor Virotherapy.

Oncolytic virotherapy has emerged as a novel form of cancer immunotherapy. Oncolytic viruses (OVs) can directly infect and lyse the tumor cells, and modulate the beneficial immune microenvironment. Vaccinia virus (VACV) is a promising oncolytic vector because of its high safety, easy gene editing, and tumor intrinsic selectivity. To further improve the safety, tumor-targeting ability, and OV-induced cancer-specific immune activation, various approaches have been used to modify OVs. The recombinant oncolytic VACVs with deleting viral virulence factors and/or arming various therapeutic genes have displayed better therapeutic effects in multiple tumor models. Moreover, the combination of OVs with other cancer immunotherapeutic approaches, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and CAR-T cells, has the potential to improve the outcome in cancer patients. This will open up new possibilities for the application of OVs in cancer treatment, especially for personalized cancer therapies.

Oncolytic viruses combined with immune checkpoint therapy for colorectal cancer is a promising treatment option.

Immunotherapy is one of the promising strategies in the treatment of oncology. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, as a type of immunotherapy, have no significant efficacy in the clinical treatment of patients with pMMR/MSS/MSI-L mCRC alone. Therefore, there is an urgent need to find combination therapies that can improve the response rate of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Oncolytic viruses are a new class of cancer drugs that, in addition to directly lysing tumor cells, can facilitate the action of immune checkpoint inhibitors by modulating the tumor microenvironment and transforming “cold” tumors into “hot” ones. The combination of oncolytic viruses and immune checkpoint inhibitors is currently being used in several primary and clinical studies to treat tumors with exciting results. The combination of genetically modified “armed” OV with ICIs is expected to be one of the treatment options for pMMR/MSS/MSI-L mCRC. In this paper, we will analyze the current status of oncolytic viruses and ICIs available for the treatment of CRC. The feasibility of OV in combination with ICI for CRC will be discussed in terms of the mechanism of action of OV in treating tumors.

Oncolytic Viruses: Newest Frontier for Cancer Immunotherapy.

Simple SummaryOncolytic viruses (OVs) are viruses that selectively target and kill cancer cells while sparing normal ones. OVs are from diverse families of viruses, but naturally occurring OVs have been genetically engineered due to their limitations in therapeutic application. These engineered OVs with enhanced tumor targeting ability, oncolytic activity, or generating potent anti-tumor immune responses are tested in preclinical animal models and cancer patients in clinical trials. Due to their multi-mechanistic anti-tumor effects, OVs have emerged one of the key cancer immunotherapy agents. However, due to the limited success with novel anti-cancer therapies such as immunotherapies and cell-based therapies, combination therapies should be tested with OVs. We discuss such combination therapies that are explored to further improve oncolytic virotherapy.Cancer remains a leading cause of death worldwide. Despite many signs of progress, currently available cancer treatments often do not provide desired outcomes for too many cancers. Therefore, newer and more effective therapeutic approaches are needed. Oncolytic viruses (OVs) have emerged as a novel cancer treatment modality, which selectively targets and kills cancer cells while sparing normal ones. In the past several decades, many different OV candidates have been developed and tested in both laboratory settings as well as in cancer patient clinical trials. Many approaches have been taken to overcome the limitations of OVs, including engineering OVs to selectively activate anti-tumor immune responses. However, newer approaches like the combination of OVs with current immunotherapies to convert “immune-cold” tumors to “immune-hot” will almost certainly improve the potency of OVs. Here, we discuss strategies that are explored to further improve oncolytic virotherapy.

Tumor-tagging by oncolytic viruses: A novel strategy for CAR-T therapy against solid tumors.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is one of the most promising immunotherapies in the past decade. It brings hope for cure to patients with previously refractory hematological malignancies. However, when translating this strategy into non-hematologic malignancies, the antitumor activity from multiple clinical studies seemed to be subtle or transient. The less satisfying efficacy in solid tumors might at least due to antigen heterogeneity, suboptimal CAR-T cell trafficking and tumor immunosuppressive environment. Here, we will review the updating strategies to challenge the therapeutic impediments of CAR-T therapy in non-hematologic malignancies. We mainly focus on the combination with oncolytic viruses (OV), the born allies for CAR-T cells. In addition to previously reported OVs-arming strategy, we discuss recently proposed tumor-tagging concept by OVs as CAR-T targets, as well as the possible improvements. Overall, tumor-tagging strategy by OVs combination with CAR-T would be a novel and promising solution for the heterogeneity and immunosuppressive microenvironment of solid tumors.

Combining Oncolytic Viruses with Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment of hematological malignancies, but solid tumors continue to pose significant challenges. Oncolytic viruses (OVs) have generated significant excitement in the field of cancer treatment recently. In particular, OVs can help CAR T cells overcome some of the immunosuppressive mechanisms within the tumor microenvironment through OV intrinsic effects or delivery of immunostimulatory agents. Numerous preclinical studies demonstrate that combining CAR T cells with OVs can increase CAR T cell trafficking, antitumor activity, and elimination of antigen-negative tumor cells. Despite promising preclinical results, only one clinical trial (NCT03740256) investigating CAR T and OV combination therapy is underway, highlighting the challenges of translating this approach to the clinic. Antiviral immunity and the route of OV administration, in addition to concerns about cost and safety, limit the clinical application of this approach. Strategies to reduce the production cost of both CAR T cells and OVs, as well as molecularly modifying OVs to enhance their bioavailability, will likely encourage further exploration of this combination therapy in clinical trials.

Abstract 912: Synergistic combination of oncolytic virotherapy and immunotherapy for glioma

Abstract Oncolytic viral immunotherapy is a novel approach to cancer treatment. Viruses can directly kill cancer cells, provide antigens to dendritic cells to stimulate a T cell response, and make cancer cells express genes of immune-enhancing cytokines locally within the tumor microenvironment. We hypothesized that the combination of oncolytic virus with a local stimulus for activating tumor-specific T cells and an anti-immunosuppressant would improve treatment of gliomas and applying the combination treatment after the resection of late-stage established glioma might overcome immunosuppression caused by surgical trauma, kill the residual tumor and cure glioma-bearing mice. Virally encoded IL15Rα-IL15 as the T cell activating stimulus and a prostaglandin synthesis inhibitor as the anti-immunosuppressant were combined with adoptive transfer of tumor-specific T cells. Two oncolytic poxviruses, vvDD vaccinia virus and myxoma virus, were each engineered to express the fusion protein IL15Rα-IL15 and a fluorescent protein. Viral gene expression (YFP or tdTomato Red) was confirmed in the murine glioma GL261 in vitro and in vivo. GL261 tumors in immunocompetent C57BL/6J mice were treated with vvDD-IL15Rα-YFP vaccinia virus or vMyx-IL15Rα-tdTr combined with other treatments, including vaccination with GARC-1 peptide (a neoantigen for GL261), rapamycin, celecoxib, and adoptive T cell therapy. The feasibility of partial resection of late-stage established glioma in mouse brain was confirmed. We found that vvDD-IL15Rα-YFP and vMyx-IL15Rα-tdTr each infected and killed GL261 cells in vitro. In vivo, NK cells and CD8+ T cells were increased in the tumor due to the expression of IL15Rα-IL15. Each component of a combination treatment contributed to prolonging survival: an oncolytic virus, the IL15Rα-IL15 expressed by the virus, a source of T cells (whether by pre-vaccination or adoptive transfer), and prostaglandin inhibition all synergized to produce elimination of gliomas in a majority of mice. vvDD-IL15Rα-YFP occasionally caused encephalitis, but vMyx-IL15Rα-tdTr was safe and effective, causing a strong infiltration of tumor-specific T cells and eliminating gliomas in 83% of treated mice All these facts suggest that IL15Rα-IL15-armed oncolytic poxviruses provide potent antitumor effects against brain tumors when combined with adoptive T cell therapy, rapamycin and celecoxib. And it is possible to do tumor resection on mice bearing late-stage glioma. We are working on applying the combination treatment after the resection of late-stage established glioma. Citation Format: Bingtao Tang, Zong Sheng Guo, David Bartlett, Jia Liu, Grant McFadden, Joanna Shisler, Kari Foss, Heidi Phillips, Terence Lichtor, Edward Roy. Synergistic combination of oncolytic virotherapy and immunotherapy for glioma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 912.

Adenovirus and Immunotherapy: Advancing Cancer Treatment by Combination.

Gene therapy with viral vectors has significantly advanced in the past few decades, with adenovirus being one of the most commonly employed vectors for cancer gene therapy. Adenovirus vectors can be divided into 2 groups: (1) replication-deficient viruses; and (2) replication-competent, oncolytic (OVs) viruses. Replication-deficient adenoviruses have been explored as vaccine carriers and gene therapy vectors. Oncolytic adenoviruses are designed to selectively target, replicate, and directly destroy cancer cells. Additionally, virus-mediated cell lysis releases tumor antigens and induces local inflammation (e.g., immunogenic cell death), which contributes significantly to the reversal of local immune suppression and development of antitumor immune responses (“cold” tumor into “hot” tumor). There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that the host immune response may provide a critical boost for the efficacy of oncolytic virotherapy. Additionally, genetic engineering of oncolytic viruses allows local expression of immune therapeutics, thereby reducing related toxicities. Therefore, the combination of oncolytic virus and immunotherapy is an attractive therapeutic strategy for cancer treatment. In this review, we focus on adenovirus-based vectors and discuss recent progress in combination therapy of adenoviruses with immunotherapy in preclinical and clinical studies.

Recent advances in targeting cancer stem cells using oncolytic viruses.

Oncolytic virotherapy is a promising antitumor strategy which utilizes the lytic nature of viral replication to kill cancer cells. Oncolytic viruses (OVs) can induce cancer cell death and trigger immune responses to metastatic cancer in vivo. Reverse genetic systems have aided the insertion of anticancer genes into various OVs to augment their oncolytic capacity. Furthermore, OVs target and destroy the population of tumor-initiating cancer stem cells. These cancer stem cells are associated with metastasis and development of resistance to conventional anticancer approaches. Targeting cancer stem cells is essential since killing only differentiated tumor cells may lead to enrichment of cancer stem cells and thus indicate a poor prognosis. In this review, we summarize the oncolytic activity of various classes of OVs towards different types of cancer stem cells and also discuss the synergistic activity achieved by the combination of OVs with traditional therapies on chemo- and radiotherapy-resistant cancer stem cells.

Review on Application of Oncolytic Virotherapy of Cancer Cells in Veterinary Medicine

Oncolytic virotherapy is using oncolytic viruses (OVs) which selectively infect and kill cancer cells. Oncolytic viruses represent a highly targeted approach to established cancer that brings a multimechanistics approach and an acceptable safety profile to patients with a variety of cancers. A variety number of viruses have been developed as oncolytic virotherapeutics, including Adenovirus, Vaccinia virus, Herpesvirus, Measles , Coxsackie A virus, Newcastle disease virus, and Reovirus . Anticancer viruses can now be engineered to selectively attack cancer cells, spare normal tissue, awaken the host immune system and reverse immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment. But virotherapy is not a cure on its own. Research suggests that virotherapies will serve to supplement chemotherapy, radiation therapy or immunotherapy. Combinations of OV with cytotoxic agents are feasible and safe, with the potential of transient immune supperssion of the host in order to increase viral access to the tumor and provide time for viral oncolysis to exceed the tumor’s replicative potential. Granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor as an immune-stimulatory cytokine boosts host immune activity through the infiltration of dendritic cells and CD4+ and CD8+ T cells at tumor sites. Concomitants to human, cancer is the leading cause of death in companion animals such as dogs and cats. The most important challenges for the successful clinical use of OVs in veterinary practice are reduction of viral toxicity, optimization of virus delivery to tumor, and enhancement of viral spread throughout the tumor mass. The multifactorial, interplay can be determined by the complex interactions between the tumor and its microenvironment, the virus, and the host immune response. Yet, there is promise that OVs will soon be a new, powerful treatment option for veterinary patients with cancer. Hence, sound understanding of the biology of OVs and its application in veterinary medicine require. Keywords: Cancer, Combination-therapy, Oncolytic virotherapy , Virus. DOI: 10.7176/ALST/79-04 Publication date: March 31 st 2020

Oncolytic Viruses: Priming Time for Cancer Immunotherapy

New immuno-oncology therapies are improving cancer treatments beyond the former standard of care, as evidenced by the recent and continuing clinical approvals for immunotherapies in a broad range of indications. However, a majority of patients (particularly those with immunologically cold tumors) still do not benefit, highlighting the need for rational combination approaches. Oncolytic viruses (OV) both directly kill tumor cells and inflame the tumor microenvironment. While OV spread can be limited by the generation of antiviral immune responses, the initial local tumor cell killing can reverse the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, resulting in more effective release of tumor-associated antigens (TAAs), cross-presentation, and antitumoral effector T cell recruitment. Moreover, many OVs can be engineered to express immunomodulatory genes. Rational combination approaches to cancer immunotherapy include the use of OVs in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or adoptive T cell therapy (ACT) to promote sustained antitumoral immune responses. OV combinations have additive or synergistic efficacy in preclinical tumor models with ICIs or ACT. Several preclinical studies have confirmed systemic reactivation and proliferation of adoptively transferred antitumoral T cells in conjunction with oncolytic OVs (expressing cytokines or TAAs) resulting from the specific tumor cell killing and immunostimulation of the tumor microenvironment which leads to increased tumor trafficking, activity, and survival. Recent clinical trials combining OVs with ICIs have shown additive effects in melanoma. Additional clinical data in an expanded range of patient indications are eagerly awaited. The relative timings of OV and ICI combination remains under-studied and is an area for continued exploration. Studies systematically exploring the effects of systemic ICIs prior to, concomitantly with, or following OV therapy will aid in the future design of clinical trials to enhance efficacy and increase patient response rates.

Optimizing oncolytic virotherapy in cancer treatment.

In the wake of the success of modern immunotherapy, oncolytic viruses (OVs) are currently seen as a potential therapeutic option for patients with cancer who do not respond or fail to achieve durable responses following treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. OVs offer a multifaceted therapeutic platform because they preferentially replicate in tumour cells, can be engineered to express transgenes that augment their cytotoxic and immunostimulatory activities, and modulate the tumour microenvironment to optimize immune-mediated tumour eradication, both at locoregional and systemic sites of disease. Lysis of tumour cells releases tumour-specific antigens that trigger both the innate and adaptive immune systems. OVs also represent attractive combination partners with other systemically delivered agents by virtue of their highly favourable safety profiles. Rational combinations of OVs with different immune modifiers and/or antitumour agents, based on mechanisms of tumour resistance to immune-mediated attack, may benefit the large, currently underserved, population of patients who respond poorly to immune checkpoint inhibition.