Oncological Outcomes In Patients Research Articles

A contemporary comparison of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.

To analyze surgical and oncologic outcomes of patients undergoing open partial nephrectomy (OPN) versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We retrospectively investigated our institutional RCC database for patients who underwent PN for RCC from 1997 to 2018. Decision for technique was at the discretion of the operating urologist, following practice patterns and training history. Outcomes analyzed included pre/peri/post-operative parameters, pathologic outcomes, and disease recurrence rates. 1088 patients underwent PN from 1997 to 2018. After exclusionary criteria, 631 patients who underwent 647 unique PNs for a total of 162 OPN and 485 LPN remained. Baseline, pre-op, and pathologic characteristics were not statistically different. Surgical time was lower in laparoscopic cases [185 vs. 205min] (p = 0.013). Margin involvement was not statistically different; LPN had lower estimated blood loss (EBL) [150 vs. 250 mL] (p < 0.001) and longer ischemia time [21 vs. 19min] (p = 0.005). LPN had shorter length of stay [2 vs. 4 days] (p < 0.001), fewer overall complications (p < 0.001), and no significant difference in high-grade complications [2.89 vs. 4.32%] (p = 0.379). Fewer LPN patients developed metastases [1.65 vs. 4.94%] (p = 0.0499). Local recurrence rates were not statistically different [1.24 vs. 3.09%] (p = 0.193). Renal function was equivalent between cohorts post-operatively. Long-term oncologic outcomes were not significantly different between LPN versus OPN, with no statistical difference in patient and tumor characteristics. LPN was associated with lower EBL, shorter length of stay, and lower overall complication risk. Renal function was not significantly different between cohorts.

The effect of enhanced recovery after surgery on oncologic outcome following radical cystectomy for urothelial bladder carcinoma

IntroductionLimited data are available regarding the effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols on the long-term outcomes of radical cystectomy (RC) in bladder cancer patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the oncological outcomes in patients who underwent RC with ERAS protocol. MethodsWe reviewed the records of patients who underwent RC for primary urothelial bladder carcinoma with curative intent from January 2003 to August 2022. The primary and secondary outcomes were recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of ERAS on oncological outcomes. ResultsA total of 967 ERAS patients and 1144 non-ERAS patients were included in this study. The RFS rates at 1, 3, and 5 years after RC were 81%, 71.5%, and 69% in the ERAS cohort, respectively. This rate in the non-ERAS group was 81%, 71%, and 67% at 1, 3, and 5 years after RC, respectively (P = 0.50). However, ERAS patients had significantly better OS with 86%, 73%, and 67% survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years compared to 84%, 68%, and 59.5% survival rates in the non-ERAS group, respectively (P = 0.002). In multivariable analysis adjusting for other relevant factors, ERAS was no longer independently associated with recurrence-free (HR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.76–1.22, P = 0.75) or overall survival (HR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.66–1.09, P = 0.28) following RC. ConclusionERAS protocols are associated with a shorter hospital stay, yet with no impact on long-term oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing RC for bladder cancer.

Oncological outcomes of patients with oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer

Oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer was recently defined by consensus as the presence of no more than two metastases and an 18-week period of oncological stability during chemotherapy. The number of patients who fit this criterion and whether their oncological outcome differs from those with multi-metastatic disease is unknown. We analysed a database of 497 patients from 2017 to 2021 with metastatic oesophageal cancer. In total, 36 (7.2%) had oligometastatic disease and significantly improved median overall survival (mOS) versus multi-metastatic disease. In synchronous OMD, mOS was 26.8 months versus 7.3 months and in metachronous OMD, 38.6 months versus 6.1 months (both p < 0.0001). A subset of oligometastatic patients who underwent surgical management of their oligometastases after primary tumour resection demonstrated significantly increased mOS compared with systemic treatment alone (60 months versus 24.4 months; p < 0.038). Oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer is associated with improved oncological outcome when compared to multi-metastatic disease. Further work is needed to identify patients who will benefit from aggressive treatment of metastatic oesophagogastric cancer.

Wedge resection, segmentectomy, and lobectomy: oncologic outcomes based on extent of surgical resection for ≤2 cm stage IA non-small cell lung cancer.

Long-standing controversy has existed over whether sublobar resection is an adequate oncological procedure for clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) ≤2 cm, despite the recent randomized trial reports of Japanese Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) 0802 and Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 140503 demonstrating non-inferior outcomes with sublobar resection compared to lobectomy. As practice patterns shift, we sought to compare oncologic outcomes in patients with these early-stage tumors after wedge resection, segmentectomy, or lobectomy in a contemporary, real-world, cohort. A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database from a single institution was conducted from 2011 to 2020 to identify all patients with clinically staged IA1 or IA2 NSCLC (tumors ≤2 cm with no nodal involvement). The primary outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), with secondary outcomes of lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS), recurrence patterns, and perioperative morbidity and mortality. A total of 480 patients were identified; 93 (19.4%) patients underwent wedge resection, 90 (18.7%) received segmentectomy, and 297 (61.9%) underwent lobectomy. Patients who underwent wedge resection had worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (23.7% ECOG 1 or 2 vs. 5.6% among segmentectomy and 5.4% among lobectomy, P<0.05). Both wedge resection and segmentectomy patients had lower preoperative mean percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (%FEV1) compared to the lobectomy group (81.8% and 82.6% vs. 89.6%, P=0.002), a higher proportion of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and interstitial lung disease (ILD), and a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index. There were no statistically significant differences in 5-year OS, DFS, or LCSS between groups: 90%, 61%, 78% for wedge resections compared with 85%, 75%, 86% for segmentectomy, and 87%, 77%, 87% for lobectomy, respectively. Recurrence was observed in 17 patients who underwent wedge resection (18.3%, 8 local, 9 distant), 12 patients who received segmentectomy (13.4%, 6 local, 6 distant), and 38 patients who underwent lobectomy (12.8%, 11 local, 27 distant), which was not significantly different (P=0.36). Patients with inferior performance status or lower baseline pulmonary function are more likely to receive wedge resection for clinical stage IA NSCLC ≤2 cm in size. For these small tumors, lobectomy, segmentectomy, and wedge resection provide comparable oncologic outcomes.

Immunocyte profiling changes in patients received epidural versus intravenous analgesia after pancreatectomy: A randomized controlled trial

BackgroundPerioperative immunosuppressants, such as surgical stress and opioid use may downregulate anti-cancer immunocytes for patients undergoing pancreatectomy. Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) may attenuate these negative effects and provide better anti-cancer immunocyte profile change than intravenous analgesia using opioid. MethodsWe randomly assigned 108 adult patients undergoing pancreatectomy to receive one of two 72-h postoperative analgesia protocols: one was TEA, and the other was intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA). The perioperative proportional changes of immunocytes relevant to anticancer immunity—namely natural killer (NK) cells, cytotoxic T cells, helper T cells, mature dendritic cells, and regulatory T (Treg) cells were determined at 1 day before surgery, at the end of surgery and on postoperative day 1,4 and 7 using flow cytometry. In addition, the progression-free survival and overall survival between the two groups were compared. ResultsAfter surgery, the proportions of NK cells and cytotoxic T cells were significantly decreased; the proportion of B cells and mature dendritic cells and Treg cells were significantly increased. However, the proportions of helper T cells exhibited no significant change. These results were comparable between the two groups. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in progression-free survival (52.75 [39.96] and 57.48 [43.66] months for patients in the TEA and IV–PCA groups, respectively; p = 0.5600) and overall survival (62.71 [35.48] and 75.11 [33.10] months for patients in the TEA and IV–PCA groups, respectively; p = 0.0644). ConclusionsTEA was neither associated with favorable anticancer immunity nor favorable oncological outcomes for patients undergoing pancreatectomy.

Patterns of recurrence and disease progression in patients with positive-margin olfactory neuroblastoma following primary resection.

Olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) is a rare, malignant tumor of the sinonasal tract that arises from olfactory epithelium. Although surgery is the preferred first-line treatment, tumor involvement of adjacent structures may preclude the ability to achieve negative margins during initial resection. Herein, the authors examine the oncological outcomes of patients with positive margins after primary resection of ONB, with the aim of determining predictors of disease progression and patterns of recurrence. The authors performed an institutional review of 25 patients with positive-margin ONB after resection. Cox survival analyses were used to determine any statistically significant predictors of worse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A total of 93 patients who were diagnosed with ONB were identified, of whom 25 patients had positive margins following their primary resection. Eleven (44%) had a delayed finding of positive margins that were initially negative in the operating room but returned as positive on final pathology. Four patients had subtotal resection (STR), whereas the remaining patients underwent gross-total resection. Twenty-four patients received adjuvant radiotherapy (96%), and 15 additionally received adjuvant chemotherapy (60%). Fourteen patients (56%) experienced recurrence/progression at a median time of 35 months following resection (IQR 19-70 months). Local recurrence occurred in 10 patients (40%), regional in 9 (36%), and distant metastasis in 2 (8%). In Cox survival analyses, the 5-year PFS and OS were 55.1% and 79.2%, respectively. Kadish stage D was predictive of worse PFS in univariate (hazard ratio [HR] 15.67, 95% CI 3.38-72.61, p < 0.001) and multivariate (HR 15.46, 95% CI 1.45-164.91, p = 0.023) analyses. Hyams grade, adjuvant chemotherapy, and primary radiotherapy were not associated with PFS. Furthermore, Kadish stage D and STR were predictive of worse OS in univariate analysis (HR 12.64, 95% CI 2.03-78.86, p = 0.007; HR 7.31, 95% CI 1.45-36.84, p = 0.016; respectively). However, local and regional recurrence was not associated with worse OS. Approximately half of patients with positive-margin ONB may experience disease recurrence. Patients with an advanced disease stage (Kadish D) may have a higher likelihood of developing recurrence/progression. Furthermore, patients with tumor burden following resection (STR and Kadish D) may have worse OS. However, in positive-margin ONB with no gross disease following initial resection, the presence of disease recurrence does not significantly alter survival when receiving salvage therapy.

Sterile Water Versus Glycine in Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors—Immunogenic and Clinical Implications

Background and objectiveWe compared the oncologic outcomes of patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) who underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TUBRT) using sterile water vs glycine irrigation. The tumoricidal and immunogenic effects of these solutions on urothelial cancer cell lines were investigated. MethodsThe medical records of 530 consecutive patients who underwent TURBT using sterile water or glycine irrigation for NMIBC were reviewed. Recurrence and progression rates were evaluated using time dependent analyses.Bladder cancer cell lines (RT4, T24 and 5637) were treated with glycine and sterile water. Cell viability was evaluated with the XTT assay. Cell membrane calreticulin levels were evaluated with flow cytometry. Extracellular high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) and heat shock 70 (HSP70) protein levels were evaluated using western blots. Key findings and limitationsAfter propensity score matching each study arm comprised 161 patients. Median follow-up was 13.6 months (IQR 6.2, 24.5). The 2-year recurrence free survival was significantly lower in the sterile water vs glycine group (43% vs 71%, respectively, p<0.0001). Similarly, the 2-years progression free survival was significantly lower in the sterile water vs glycine group (85% vs 94%, respectively, p<0.014). Sterile water treatment resulted in the lowest number of viable cells. Early and late immunogenic cell death markers were markedly elevated in cells treated with glycine. Conclusions and clinical implicationsSterile water compared to glycine irrigation during TURBT for NMIBC was associated with higher recurrence and progression rates. Possible explanation for these findings is the diminished immune response associated with sterile water reflected in a comparatively lesser expression of immune response inducers. Patient summaryWe compared two irrigation fluids in non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer surgery: glycine and sterile water. Glycine outperformed sterile water in cancer recurrence, possibly boosting immunogenicity over sterile water.

Comparison of Oncological Outcomes of Pembrolizumab as Second-line Therapy and Maintenance Avelumab Therapy in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma After Platinum-based Chemotherapy.

Sequential therapy using chemotherapy and subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment prolongs the survival of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). However, no comparison data for oncological outcome between pembrolizumab and avelumab has been reported. Thus, we compared oncological outcomes between pembrolizumab as second-line therapy and maintenance avelumab therapy in patients with advanced UC. We retrospectively evaluated patients with advanced UC treated with pembrolizumab or avelumab between January 2018 and February 2023. We compared oncological outcomes after adjusting for patient characteristics. Immune-related adverse events (AEs) in each group were evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. There were 186 and 44 patients in the pembrolizumab- and avelumab-treated cohorts, respectively. After propensity score matching, 43 patients from each group were selected and analyzed. Median progression-free survival from the initiation of pembrolizumab and avelumab treatments was 126 and 139 days, respectively (log-rank test, p=0.625). Median overall survival in the pembrolizumab and avelumab cohorts were 658 days and not reached, respectively (log-rank test, p=0.249). Thirty-eight (20.4%) and 14 (31.8%) all-grade immune-related AEs were observed in 186 pembrolizumab- and 44 avelumab-treated patients, respectively (chi-squared test, p=0.112). Regarding endocrine-related AEs, 12 (6.5%) and none (0%) were observed in pembrolizumab- and avelumab-treated patients, respectively (Fisher's exact probability test, p=0.129). Pembrolizumab and maintenance avelumab therapy provide equivalent oncological outcomes in patients with advanced UC. Although no significant difference was observed, there might be a potential risk of higher endocrine-related AEs due to pembrolizumab compared to avelumab maintenance therapy.

The impact of a positive COVID-19 test on timeliness of radiation in patients receiving brachytherapy

BACKGROUNDDelays in initiating and completing brachytherapy may have adverse oncologic outcomes for patients with cervical, uterine, and prostate cancer. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on brachytherapy in the United States has not been well-characterized. OBJECTIVESWe aim to evaluate how a positive COVID-19 test affected timeliness of treatment for patients undergoing brachytherapy for cervical, uterine, and prostate cancer. METHODSWe queried the National Cancer Database to identify patients diagnosed with cervical, uterine, and prostate cancer in 2019 and 2020 who received brachytherapy in their treatment. Patients who tested positive for COVID-19 between cancer diagnosis and start of radiation were compared to those who did not test positive for COVID-19. Time in days from cancer diagnosis to initiation of radiation was compared using two-sample t-tests with p < 0.05 signifying significant differences. RESULTSWe identified 38,341 patients with cervical (n = 6,925), uterine (n = 18,587), and prostate cancer (n = 12,829). Rates of COVID-19 positivity were cervical cancer (n = 135; 2%), uterine cancer (n = 236; 1.3%), and prostate cancer (n = 141; 1%). Of those, 35% of cervical, 49% of uterine, and 43% of prostate cancer patients tested positive between their cancer diagnosis and initiation of radiation. Median days to radiation was significantly longer in these patients: 78 versus 51 for cervical cancer (p < 0.01), 150 versus 104 for uterine cancer (p < 0.01), and 154 versus 124 for prostate cancer (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONSFor patients with cervical, uterine, and prostate cancer diagnosed between 2019–2020, testing positive for COVID-19 after their cancer diagnosis was associated with a delay to initiation of radiation by 4–7 weeks.

Associations between pancreatectomy type, treatment sequence and textbook oncologic outcomes in patients with localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BackgroundPrior studies have shown that achievement of textbook oncologic outcomes (TOO) after pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with better survival outcomes. However, the associations between TOO, procedure type, and treatment sequence has not been examined. MethodsPatients with resected PDAC were identified within the National Cancer Database (2010–2018). We analyzed rates of TOO (defined as no 30-day readmission, no 90-day mortality, no prolonged length of stay, negative surgical margins, receipt of multi-agent chemotherapy, and nodal yield ≥12) stratified by procedure (pancreatoduodenectomy vs. distal pancreatectomy vs. total pancreatectomy) and treatment sequence (up-front surgery vs. neoadjuvant therapy). ResultsA total of 20,155 patients were identified. Patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy were less likely to have TOO compared to pancreatoduodenectomy (12.6% vs. 17.5%; OR=0.77, 95% CI: 0.68–0.88). There was no difference in TOO between patients who underwent total pancreatectomy compared to pancreatoduodenectomy (16.4% vs. 17.5%; OR=0.96, 95% CI: 0.84–1.11). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a 5-fold increase in the odds of TOO (OR=5.07, 95% CI: 4.35–5.91). TOO was associated with improved OS regardless of surgical procedure (pancreatoduodenectomy: median OS: 33.7 vs. 20.5mo; HR=0.69, 95% CI: 0.65–0.73; distal pancreatectomy: median OS: 35.8 vs. 23.9mo; HR=0.73, 95% CI: 0.64–0.84; total pancreatectomy: median OS: 30.1 vs. 19.9mo; HR=0.69, 95% CI: 0.61–0.79). ConclusionsThe rate of TOO was lower for distal pancreatectomy as compared to pancreatoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy. Neoadjuvant therapy was associated with higher likelihood of TOO. Regardless of pancreatectomy type, TOO was associated with improved OS.

Textbook oncologic outcomes are associated with increased overall survival in patients with pancreatic head cancer after undergoing laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy

BackgroundTextbook oncologic outcomes (TOO) have been used to evaluate long-term oncologic outcomes for patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) but not laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD). The aim of the study was to assess the prognostic value of TOO for patients with pancreatic head cancer undergoing LPD and discuss the risk factors associated with achieving TOO.MethodsPatients with pancreatic head cancer who underwent LPD in West China Hospital from January 2015 to May 2022 were consecutively enrolled. TOO was defined as achieving R0 resection, examination of ≥ 12 lymph nodes, no prolonged length of stay, no 30-day readmission/death, and receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Survival analysis was used to determine the prognostic value of a TOO on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Logistic regression was used to identify the risk factors of a TOO. The rates of a TOO and of each indicator were compared in patients who suffered or not from delayed gastric emptying (DGE).ResultsA total of 44 (25.73%) patients achieved TOO which was associated with improved median OS (TOO 32 months vs. non-TOO 20 months, P = 0.034) and a better RFS (TOO 19 months vs. non-TOO 13 months, P = 0.053). Patients suffering from DGE [odds ratio (OR) 4.045, 95% CI 1.151–14.214, P = 0.029] were independent risk factors for TOO. In addition, patients with DGE after surgery had a significantly lower rate of TOO (P = 0.015) than patients without DGE.ConclusionsAs there were significant differences between patients who achieved TOO or not, TOO is a good indicator for long-term oncologic outcomes in patients with pancreatic head cancer after undergoing LPD. DGE is the risk factor for achieving TOO, so it is important to prevent the DGE after LPD to improve the rate of TOO.

Intrauterine manipulator use during laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: association for pathological factors and oncologic outcomes

ObjectiveTo examine the association between intrauterine manipulator use and pathological factors and oncologic outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer who had laparoscopic hysterectomy in Japan.MethodsThis was a nationwide retrospective cohort...

Preoperative CA 19-9 Predicts Disease Progression in Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: An Analysis from the US HIPEC Collaborative.

Patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM) are increasingly treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC). Unfortunately, data identifying preoperative risk factors for poor oncologic outcomes after this procedure are limited. We aimed to determine the prognostic value of preoperative CEA, CA 125, and CA 19-9 on disease progression after CRS/HIPEC. Patients with CRPM treated with curative intent CRS/HIPEC from 12 participating sites in the United States from 2000 to 2017 were identified. Progression-free survival (PFS), defined as disease progression or recurrence, was the primary outcome. In 279 patients who met inclusion criteria, the rate of disease progression was 63.8%, with a median PFS of 11 months (interquartile range [IQR] 5-20). Elevated CA 19-9 was associated with dismal PFS at 2 years (8.9% elevated vs. 30% not elevated, p < 0.01). In 113 patients who underwent upfront CRS/HIPEC, CA 19-9 emerged as the sole tumor marker independently predictive of worse PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.88, p = 0.048). In the subgroup of patients who had received neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), no variable was independently predictive of PFS. CA 19-9 levels over 37 U/ml were highly specific for accelerated disease progression after CRS/HIPEC. Lastly, there was no association between PFS and elevated CEA or CA 125. Elevated CA 19-9 is associated with decreased PFS in patients with CRPM. While traditionally CEA is the main tumor marker assessed in colon cancer, we found that CA 19-9 may better inform preoperative risk stratification for poor oncologic outcomes in patients with CRPM. However, prospective studies are required to confirm this association.

Changes in the Perioperative Management and Outcomes of Patients With Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Undergoing Radical Nephroureterectomy at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: Over 20 Years of Experience.

We evaluated surgical trends, perioperative management evolution, and oncologic outcomes in patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) at a tertiary cancer center over a 24-year period. Between 1995 and 2018, we evaluated 743 consecutive patients with UTUC who underwent RNU. Generalized additive models were used to estimate the associations between date of surgery and continuous outcomes using a linear model, dichotomous outcomes using a logit link, categorical outcomes using multinomial models, and 2- and 5-year survival outcomes using Cox proportional hazards models. Over the study period, preoperative diagnostic endoscopic biopsies increased from 10% to 66%, along with the proportion of patients who underwent RNU for high-grade disease from 55% to 91%. The rate of open RNU declined from 100% to 56% with a rise in minimally invasive approaches. Median lymph node yield increased with more retroperitoneal lymph node dissections performed. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy utilization increased with a contemporary utilization rate of 32%, coinciding with an increase in pT0 rate from 2% to 8%. Cancer-specific survival probabilities improved over the study period, while metastasis-free and overall survival remained stable. We found several changes in treatment patterns and outcomes for patients with UTUC over the past 2 decades. How individual alterations in management factors, such as patient selection, perioperative chemotherapy, lymphadenectomy, and salvage therapies, impact patient outcomes is challenging in the setting of multiple overlapping practice changes for this rare disease and warrants further investigation.

Clinical and oncologic outcomes of posterior only total en bloc spondylectomy for spinal metastasis involving third lumbar vertebra: A case series.

A posterior-only total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) of the L3 level was deemed a highly intricate surgical procedure, necessitating the preservation of the L3 nerve root to prevent neurological deterioration. Despite bilateral preservation efforts of the L3 nerve roots, neurological deterioration proved unavoidable. This study aims to present the clinical, neurologic, and oncologic outcomes of spinal metastasis patients who underwent a posterior-only approach TES, encompassing the L3 vertebra. All patients with L3-involved spinal metastasis undergoing posterior TES between January 2018 and January 2022 were investigated. The primary outcomes considered were the local recurrence rate and manual muscle testing of the lumbar myotome. Secondary outcomes included Frankel neurological status, operative time, blood loss, perioperative and postoperative complications, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score. Five patients with TES involving L3 (three females) met the inclusion criteria. All patients had solitary metastases (three in the lungs, 2 in the breasts). Postoperatively, all patients experienced weakness of the hip flexors, but they were able to ambulate independently 12 months after surgery. One patient exhibited adjacent segment (L2) disease progression and underwent corpectomy 18 months after TES. No local recurrences at the surgical site were detected on magnetic resonance imaging at the 1-year follow-up. Posterior-only TES for L3-involved vertebrae yielded excellent results in the local control of metastatic disease. Despite hip flexor weakness, all patients were able to regain independent ambulation after 12 months. TES can offer favorable clinical and oncological outcomes in patients with solitary spinal metastases.

Association of perioperative acute kidney injury with oncological outcomes in patients who undergo radical cystectomy: A multicenter retrospective study.

660 Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent complication in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who undergo radical cystectomy (RC). Previous studies have reported that AKI during cancer treatment was associated with poor oncological outcomes in several malignancies. Moreover, we previously have reported the negative impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy-induced AKI on oncological outcomes in patients with MIBC. However, the impact of perioperative AKI on oncological outcomes in patients who undergo RC remains unclear. Methods: This multi-institutional retrospective study included 798 patients with MIBC who underwent RC. AKI was defined according to the KDIGO criteria. Stage 1 AKI was diagnosed with an increase in serum creatinine by just 0.3 mg/dL. Patients were divided into two groups: patients who developed AKI after RC (AKI group) and patients who did not (non-AKI group). Multivariable Cox-proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of perioperative AKI on recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Results: The median age and follow-up period were 70 years and 64 months, respectively. Of the 798 patients, 408 (51%) developed AKI after RC. Approximately 73% AKI were stage 1 AKI. RFS, CSS, and OS in the AKI group were significantly shorter than those in the non-AKI group ( P = 0.003, P = 0.035, and P &lt; 0.001, respectively). After adjustment for confounding variables, AKI was significantly associated with shorter RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.357, P = 0.019), CSS (HR 1.345, P = 0.042), and OS (HR 1.344, P = 0.009). Conclusions: Perioperative AKI was associated with poor oncological outcomes in patients with MIBC who underwent RC. [Table: see text]

Latissimus Dorsi Flap Revisited: Coverage of Large Chest Wall Defects Following Mastectomy for Locally Advanced Breast Carcinoma and Angiosarcoma.

The latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap (LDMF) remains a significant tool in the armamentarium of the oncoplastic breast surgeon. Despite declining popularity for reconstruction, owing to the increasing use of implants and free flaps, it still has an important role in certain salvage situations and as a flap to cover large defects. We report our experience with the use of LDMF for immediate coverage of large mastectomy defects when options are limited. Retrospective series of prospectively collected patient records. Patient and tumour characteristics, length of stay, and post-operative and oncologic outcomes are reported. Patients with angiosarcoma were discussed at tertiary sarcoma centres as per national guidelines. Operations were carried out by oncoplastic breast surgeons. The case series was approved by the institutional information governance department in line with institutional requirements for patient data sharing. All patients provided written consent for photography. Descriptive statistics were used to report findings.Median (IQR) was used for continuous variables. Six women were included, with a median age of 62.5 years, from December 2019 to October 2022. Follow-up ranged from 15 to 49 months. Median tumour size was 72.5 (16.25) mm. Four patients had locally advanced breast carcinoma (LABC), and two had breast angiosarcoma. The donor site and chest wall defects were closed primarily in all cases. Median length of stay was three nights. All mastectomy wounds healed without issues and any delay to their adjuvant treatment. One patient had a minor latissimus dorsi (LD) donor site wound breakdown managed conservatively. Three patients had adjuvant radiotherapy after surgery. Four patients, one after high-grade angiosarcoma and three after aggressive breast carcinoma, had a locoregional recurrence or distant metastases and succumbed within 20 months of surgery. The LDMF can be a reliable option for the primary closure of large post-mastectomy wounds. Its use can lead to timely wound healing, allowing patients to undergo adjuvant treatment without delay. However, the overall oncologic outcomes in patients with LABC and angiosarcoma are poor due to the underlying aggressive tumour biology. Long-term outcomes are to be interpreted with caution due to the small number of patients with diverse pathologic features.

Oncologic Outcome of Patients With Pathologic T0 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.

To investigate the oncologic outcomes of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who have achieved a pathologic complete response (pCR) of the primary tumor (ypT0) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT). Patients with thoracic ESCC who underwent scheduled NCRT followed by surgery at our hospital between January 2010 and December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Only patients with ypT0 disease were enrolled in this study. A total of 118 patients were ultimately enrolled in this study. Ninety-two patients achieved pCR in the primary tumor and lymph nodes (ypT0N0), while 26 patients had residual metastatic disease in 52 lymph nodes (ypT0N+). Forty-five of the 52 lymph nodes with residual tumors were abdominal lymph nodes. Positive lymph nodes were more often observed in patients with tumors located in the lower third of the esophagus. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates for the entire study group were 96.5%, 79.5%, and 77.1%, and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 90.5%, 76.8%, and 69.0%, respectively. According to multivariate analyses, pN classification was an independent predictor of both OS and DFS (P < 0.05), while sex and cT classification were also found to be independent prognostic factors for DFS (P < 0.05). Residual nodal metastatic disease in patients with ypT0 ESCC after NCRT was more often found in the abdominal lymph nodes. pN classification was an independent predictor of both OS and DFS for ypT0 ESCC patients after NCRT.

Survival benefit of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX for patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

While patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) are a target population for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), formal guidelines for neoadjuvant therapy are lacking. We assessed the perioperative and oncological outcomes in patients with BRPC undergoing NAC with FOLFIRINOX for patients undergoing upfront surgery (US). The AHPBA criteria for borderline resectability and/or a CA19-9 level > 100 μ/mL defined borderline resectable tumors retrieved from a prospectively populated institutional registry from 2007 to 2020. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) at 1 and 3 years. A Cox Proportional Hazard model based on intention to treat was used. A receiver-operator characteristics (ROC) curve was constructed to assess the discriminatory capability of the use of CA19-9 > 100 μ/mL to predict resectability and mortality. Forty BRPC patients underwent NAC, while 46 underwent US. The median OS with NAC was 19.8 months (interquartile range [IQR], 10.3-44.24) vs. 10.6 months (IQR, 6.37-17.6) with US. At 1 year, 70% of the NAC group and 41.3% of the US group survived (p = 0.008). At 3 years, 42.5 % of the NAC group and 10.9% of the US group survived (p = 0.001). NAC significantly reduced the hazard of death (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.54; p = 0.001). CA19-9 > 100 μ/mL showed poor discrimination in predicting mortality, but was a moderate predictor of resectability. We found a survival benefit of NAC with FOLFIRINOX for BRPC. Greater pre-treatment of CA19-9 and multivessel involvement on initial imaging were associated with progression of the disease following NAC.

Association of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings with oncologic outcomes in non-palpable localized prostate cancer.

281 Background: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is becoming increasingly integrated into the evaluation and medical decision making for localized prostate cancer. However, mpMRI findings have not been correlated with prostate cancer outcomes and therefore are not currently included in staging. The purpose of this study was to test the association between mpMRI detected extraprostatic extension with oncologic outcomes in patients with non-palpable prostate cancer. Methods: We used the Veterans Affairs Prostate Data Core to identify patients diagnosed with cT1N0M0 prostate cancer between 2000-2021 with an mpMRI prior to definitive treatment. We reviewed MRI reports to identify presence of extracapsular extension (MRI-T3a), seminal vesicle invasion (MRI-T3b), and adjacent organ invasion (MRI-T4). We assessed the impact of mpMRI findings on metastasis free survival with multivariable Fine-Gray competing-risks regression. Results: Overall, 3,142 veterans with cT1N0M0 prostate cancer were included. There were 1,411 (45%) Black patients. By clinical staging, 904 (29%) had low risk, 1,626 (52%) had intermediate risk, and 612 (19%) had high risk disease. The majority of patients were treated with radiation (N=2,267; 72%). There were 217 (7%) patients with MRI-T3a disease, 87 (3%) patients with MRI-T3b disease, and 26 (1%) patients with MRI-T4 disease. The median follow-up time was 5.4 years (90% CI, 1-13 years). The 5-year cumulative incidence of metastases for patients with low, intermediate, and high risk prostate cancer were 3% (95% CI, 2-4%), 7% (95% CI, 6-8%), and 15% (95% CI, 12-18%). The 5-year cumulative incidence of metastases for patients with MRI-T3a, MRI-T3b, and MRI-T4 disease were 15% (95% CI, 10-20%), 29% (95% CI, 29-39%), and 40% (95% CI, 13-66%). After controlling for age, race, risk stratification (which includes prostate specific antigen (PSA) and grade group), local therapy, and co-morbidities, the presence of MRI-T3a (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.09-2.29, p=0.02), MRI-T3b (HR 3.38, 95% CI 2.31-4.95, p&lt;0.0001), and MRI-T4 disease (HR 4.47, 95% CI 2.32-8.62, p&lt;0.0001) were independently associated with worse metastasis free survival. Similar results were obtained with PSA and grade group as individual variables. Conclusions: Extraprostatic extension observed on mpMRI is independently prognostic of metastasis free survival in patients with non-palpable prostate cancer. mpMRI is a critical imaging modality that should be widely available for patients with prostate cancer, and studies are ongoing to define its role as a standard staging modality.