Once-weekly Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Research Articles

Dulaglutide, a GLP-1 receptor agonist, for the treatment of type 2 diabetes

The prevalence of diabetes continues to rise worldwide. Over the past five years, available treatment options have expanded to allow individualized management of patients with diabetes. The glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have become an essential tool in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This class provides several advantages for glycemic control with minimal risk of hypoglycemia. Based on the most recent guidelines for T2DM, GLP-1 receptor agonists can be prescribed as monotherapy or in combination with oral antidiabetic agents or insulin for the management of T2DM. Dulaglutide has become the most recent and available GLP-1 receptor agonist on the market. Dulaglutide is a once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonist that can be used as monotherapy or as a second-line agent for T2DM. This review article summarizes the efficacy, safety, and clinical attributes of dulaglutide among patients with T2DM.

Effect of baseline body mass index (BMI; < 30 kg/m2, ≥30-< 35 kg/m2, and ≥35 kg/m2) on glycaemic response and weight change in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) with baseline HbA1c ≥7.5% after treatment with the once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA), dulaglutide, and active comparators in five clinical studies (AWARD 1 – 5)

Introduction: We investigated the effect of baseline BMI on treatment with dulaglutide and active comparators in patients with T2DM with baseline HbA1c ≥7.5% (AWARD 1 – 5). The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends HbA1c ≥7.5% for initiation of GLP-1RA therapy.

Cardiovascular safety of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist taspoglutide in people with type 2 diabetes: an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

To study the short-term cardiovascular effects of the once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist taspoglutide. We conducted a meta-analysis of individual-participant data from nine randomized controlled trials in the T-Emerge programme, which assessed the efficacy and safety of taspoglutide in type 2 diabetes. Our primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular disease (CVD) and acute myocardial infarction, stroke and hospitalization for unstable angina. Overall, 7056 individuals were included in the analysis, and there were 67 primary endpoint events during 7478 person-years of follow-up (40 vs 27 events in the intervention vs control groups, respectively). The odds ratio for the composite endpoint among people randomized to taspoglutide was 0.94 (95% confidence interval 0.57-1.56), which was robust across multiple subgroups. Longer-term data were not available as the development of taspoglutide was stopped because of gastrointestinal intolerance and serious hypersensitivity reactions. The available data suggest that short-term, once-weekly administration of taspoglutide was not associated with an excess risk of CVD, and provide insights relevant to the development of other novel once-weekly incretin mimetics.

Pharmacokinetics and clinical use of incretin-based therapies in patients with chronic kidney disease and type2 diabetes.

The prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) of stages 3-5 (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] <60mL/min) is about 25-30% in patients with type2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). While most oral antidiabetic agents have limitations in patients with CKD, incretin-based therapies are increasingly used for the management of T2DM. This review analyses (1)the influence of CKD on the pharmacokinetics of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists; and (2)the efficacy/safety profile of these agents in clinical practice when prescribed in patients with both T2DM and CKD. Most DPP-4 inhibitors (sitagliptin, vildagliptin, saxagliptin, alogliptin) are predominantly excreted by the kidneys. Thereby, pharmacokinetic studies showed that total exposure to the drug is increased in proportion to the decline of GFR, leading to recommendations for appropriate dose reductions according to the severity of CKD. In these conditions, clinical studies reported a good efficacy and safety profile in patients with CKD. In contrast, linagliptin is eliminated by a predominantly hepatobiliary route. As a pharmacokinetic study showed only minimal influence of decreased GFR on total exposure, no dose adjustment of linagliptin is required in the case of CKD. The experience with GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with CKD is more limited. Exenatide is eliminated by renal mechanisms and should not be given in patients with severe CKD. Liraglutide is not eliminated by the kidney, but it should be used with caution because of the limited experience in patients with CKD. Only limited pharmacokinetic data are also available for lixisenatide, exenatide long-acting release (LAR) and other once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonists in current development. Several case reports of acute renal failure have been described with GLP-1 receptor agonists, probably triggered by dehydration resulting from gastrointestinal adverse events. However, increasing GLP-1 may also exert favourable renal effects that could contribute to reducing the risk of diabetic nephropathy. In conclusion, the already large reassuring experience with DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with CKD offers new opportunities to the clinician, whereas more caution is required with GLP-1 receptor agonists because of the limited experience in this population.

Safe and Effective Use of the Single-Use Pen for Injection of Once Weekly Dulaglutide in Injection-Naïve Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Patients and clinicians often avoid initiating injectable therapy in type 2 diabetes (T2D)—fearing pain and complexity. The single-use pen (SUP) device contains a pre-filled syringe and automates needle insertion and retraction, and drug delivery. It was designed for subcutaneous delivery of 0.5 mL of dulaglutide, a once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist.

Dulaglutide: a novel once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist

Dulaglutide is a novel continuous-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist developed for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes. It consists of two modified ‘GLP-1’ moieties covalently linked to a human immunoglobulin (IgG) 4-FC heavy chain. The large size of the molecule prolongs plasma half-life and allows for once-weekly administration. Clinical Phase II and III trials show dose-dependent reductions of HbA1c up to 1.6%, reduction in fasting plasma glucose up to 2.7 mmol/l and weight reductions up to 3.2 kg. Presumably, a dose of 1.5 mg once weekly will be the intended dose for treatment. Safety data indicate a low incidence of hypoglycemia and the most frequently reported adverse events are gastrointestinal, primarily nausea, which seem to reduce over time.

Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide monotherapy versus metformin in type 2 diabetes in a randomized controlled trial (AWARD-3).

Compare the efficacy and safety of monotherapy with dulaglutide, a once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonist, to metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes. The primary objective compared dulaglutide 1.5 mg and metformin on change from baseline glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at 26 weeks. This 52-week double-blind study randomized patients to subcutaneous dulaglutide 1.5 mg, dulaglutide 0.75 mg, or metformin. Patients (N = 807) had HbA1c ≥6.5% (≥48 mmol/mol) and ≤9.5% (≤80 mmol/mol) with diet and exercise alone or low-dose oral antihyperglycemic medication (OAM) monotherapy; OAMs were discontinued at beginning of lead-in period. At 26 weeks, changes from baseline HbA1c (least squares [LS] mean ± SE) were: dulaglutide 1.5 mg, -0.78 ± 0.06% (-8.5 ± 0.70 mmol/mol); dulaglutide 0.75 mg, -0.71 ± 0.06% (-7.8 ± 0.70 mmol/mol); and metformin, -0.56 ± 0.06% (-6.1 ± 0.70 mmol/mol). Dulaglutide 1.5 and 0.75 mg were superior to metformin (LS mean difference): -0.22% (-2.4 mmol/mol) and -0.15% (-1.6 mmol/mol) (one-sided P < 0.025, both comparisons), respectively. Greater percentages reached HbA1c targets <7.0% (<53 mmol/mol) and ≤6.5% (≤48 mmol/mol) with dulaglutide 1.5 and 0.75 mg compared with metformin (P < 0.05, all comparisons). No severe hypoglycemia was reported. Compared with metformin, decrease in weight was similar with dulaglutide 1.5 mg and smaller with dulaglutide 0.75 mg. Over 52 weeks, nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting were the most common adverse events; incidences were similar between dulaglutide and metformin. Dulaglutide improves glycemic control and is well tolerated as monotherapy in patients with early stage type 2 diabetes.

Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide added onto pioglitazone and metformin versus exenatide in type 2 diabetes in a randomized controlled trial (AWARD-1).

To compare the efficacy and safety of dulaglutide, a once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonist, with placebo and exenatide in type 2 diabetic patients. The primary objective was to determine superiority of dulaglutide 1.5 mg versus placebo in HbA1c change at 26 weeks. This 52-week, multicenter, parallel-arm study (primary end point: 26 weeks) randomized patients (2:2:2:1) to dulaglutide 1.5 mg, dulaglutide 0.75 mg, exenatide 10 μg, or placebo (placebo-controlled period: 26 weeks). Patients were treated with metformin (1,500-3,000 mg) and pioglitazone (30-45 mg). Mean baseline HbA1c was 8.1% (65 mmol/mol). Least squares mean ± SE HbA1c change from baseline to the primary end point was -1.51 ± 0.06% (-16.5 ± 0.7 mmol/mol) for dulaglutide 1.5 mg, -1.30 ± 0.06% (-14.2 ± 0.7 mmol/mol) for dulaglutide 0.75 mg, -0.99 ± 0.06% (-10.8 ± 0.7 mmol/mol) for exenatide, and -0.46 ± 0.08% (-5.0 ± 0.9 mmol/mol) for placebo. Both dulaglutide doses were superior to placebo at 26 weeks (both adjusted one-sided P < 0.001) and exenatide at 26 and 52 weeks (both adjusted one-sided P < 0.001). Greater percentages of patients reached HbA1c targets with dulaglutide 1.5 mg and 0.75 mg than with placebo and exenatide (all P < 0.001). At 26 and 52 weeks, total hypoglycemia incidence was lower in patients receiving dulaglutide 1.5 mg than in those receiving exenatide; no dulaglutide-treated patients reported severe hypoglycemia. The most common gastrointestinal adverse events for dulaglutide were nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Events were mostly mild to moderate and transient. Both once-weekly dulaglutide doses demonstrated superior glycemic control versus placebo and exenatide with an acceptable tolerability and safety profile.

Effects of the once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist dulaglutide on ambulatory blood pressure and heart rate in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus, are associated with small reductions in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and increases in heart rate. However, findings based on clinic measurements do not adequately assess a drug's 24-hour pharmacodynamic profile. The effects of dulaglutide, a once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, on BP and heart rate were investigated using ambulatory BP monitoring. Patients (n=755; 56±10 years; 81% white; 48% women), with type 2 diabetes mellitus, taking ≥1 oral antihyperglycemic medication, with a clinic BP between 90/60 and 140/90 mm Hg were randomized to dulaglutide (1.5 or 0.75 mg) or placebo subcutaneously for 26 weeks. Ambulatory BP monitoring was performed at baseline and at 4, 16, and 26 weeks. The primary end point was change from baseline to week 16 in mean 24-hour SBP, a tree gatekeeping strategy compared the effects of dulaglutide to placebo. Both doses of dulaglutide were noninferior to placebo for changes in 24-hour SBP and diastolic blood pressure, and dulaglutide 1.5 mg significantly reduced SBP (least squares mean difference [95% confidence interval]), -2.8 mm Hg [-4.6, -1.0]; P≤0.001). Dulaglutide 0.75 mg was noninferior to placebo (1.6 bpm; [0.3, 2.9]; P≤0.02) for 24-hour heart rate (least squares mean difference [95% confidence interval]), but dulaglutide 1.5 mg was not (2.8 bpm [1.5, 4.2]). Dulaglutide 1.5 mg was associated with a reduction in 24-hour SBP and an increase in 24-hour heart rate. The mechanisms responsible for the observed effects remain to be clarified.

Albiglutide Does Not Prolong QTc Interval in Healthy Subjects: A Thorough ECG Study

IntroductionAlbiglutide, a selective once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, is being developed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Albiglutide’s effect on cardiac repolarization (QTc interval) was assessed in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in healthy subjects with a nested crossover comparison for moxifloxacin.MethodsSubjects were randomized to albiglutide (n = 85) or placebo (n = 89) and received injections of 30 mg albiglutide or placebo on Days 1 and 8 and 50 mg albiglutide or placebo on Days 15, 22, 29, and 36. In the placebo group, moxifloxacin was administered on Day −1 in half the subjects and on Day 40 in the other half. Blood samples for albiglutide plasma concentration were drawn on Days 4 and 39 and serial ECGs were extracted from continuous recordings on Days −2 (baseline), −1, 4, 39, and 40.ResultsDemographics were generally similar between albiglutide and placebo subjects: mean age was 29 years and BMI 25 kg/m2. Mean change-from-baseline QTcI (∆QTcI, which was corrected for individual heart rate) on Day 4 after a single dose of albiglutide 30 mg and on Day 39 after repeat dosing with albiglutide 50 mg once weekly was similar to the placebo response. The placebo-corrected ΔQTcI (ΔΔQTcI) on both albiglutide doses was small with the largest ΔΔQTcI of 1.1 ms (upper bound of 90% CI 3.8 ms) on Day 4 and −0.6 ms (upper bound of CI 1.8 ms) on Day 39. Moxifloxacin caused the largest mean effect on ΔΔQTcI of 10.9 ms and the lower bound of the CI was above 5 ms at all preselected timepoints, thereby demonstrating assay sensitivity. Albiglutide was well tolerated and there were no clinically relevant differences in safety data between albiglutide and placebo.ConclusionAlbiglutide at doses up to 50 mg in healthy subjects did not prolong the QTc interval.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13300-014-0055-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Cardiovascular outcomes associated with a new once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonist vs. traditional therapies for type 2 diabetes: a simulation analysis

The effect of glucose-lowering agents on diabetes-related complications including cardiovascular (CV) events is of major importance. In the absence of a long-term study, we simulated such a trial using a mathematical model where subjects were given exenatide once-weekly (EQW), which has been shown to improve glycaemic control and reduce weight, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and lipids in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Using the Archimedes Model, we followed a simulated population derived from individuals with T2DM in NHANES who were drug-naïve or on oral agents only. We modelled the effects of four treatment strategies including standard care (SC, maintaining levels of control seen in NHANES), intensive glycaemic control (IGC, target HbA1c < 7% with conventional antidiabetic agents) and two versions of EQW added to SC: one with glycaemic and weight reduction only (EQW-1) and one with additional improvements in SBP and lipids (EQW-2). EQW strategies were derived from 52-week clinical trial data. Endpoints included macrovascular and microvascular outcomes. Simulated EQW treatment resulted in earlier benefit and 2-3 times greater relative reductions in major adverse CV events than IGC when compared to SC (6% relative reduction by year 20 for IGC vs. 12 and 17% for the EQW strategies). For microvascular complications, EQW showed comparable benefit to IGC for neuropathy but significantly greater impact on renal complications. This analysis shows that the novel drug EQW has the potential to greatly reduce CV events through its combined effects on glycaemia, weight and other CV risk factors.

An overview of once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists-available efficacy and safety data and perspectives for the future

Incretin-based therapies, such as the injectable glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and orally administered dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, have recently been introduced into clinical practice. At present, the GLP-1 receptor agonists need to be administered once or twice daily. Several once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonists are in phase 3 development. This review examines the efficacy, safety and perspective for the future of the once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonists: exenatide once weekly, taspoglutide, albiglutide, LY2189265 and CJC-1134-PC, and compared them to the currently available agonists, exenatide BID and liraglutide QD. A greater reduction in haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and fasting plasma glucose was found with the once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonists compared with exenatide BID, while the effect on postprandial hyperglycaemia was modest with the once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonist. The reduction in HbA1c was in most studies greater compared to oral antidiabetic drugs and insulin glargine. The reduction in weight did not differ between the short- and long-acting agonists. The gastrointestinal side effects were less with the once-weekly agonists compared with exenatide BID, except for taspoglutide. Antibodies seem to be most frequent with exenatide once weekly, while hypersensitivity has been described in few patients treated with taspoglutide. Injection site reactions differ among the long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists and are observed more frequently than with exenatide BID and liraglutide. In humans, no signal has been found indicating an association between the once-weekly agonists and C-cell cancer. The cardiovascular safety, durability of glucose control and effect on weight will emerge from several ongoing major long-term trials. The once-weekly GLP-1 receptor analogues are promising candidates for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, although their efficacy may not be superior to once-daily analogue liraglutide.