Once-daily Extended-release Tacrolimus Research Articles

Impact of Switching From Immediate- or Prolonged-Release to Once-Daily Extended-Release Tacrolimus (LCPT) on Tremor in Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients: The Observational ELIT Study.

Once-daily extended-release tacrolimus (LCPT) exhibits increased bioavailability versus immediate-release (IR-TAC) and prolonged release (PR-TAC) tacrolimus. Improvements in tremor were previously reported in a limited number of kidney transplant patients who switched to LCPT. We conducted a non-interventional, non-randomized, uncontrolled, longitudinal, prospective, multicenter study to assess the impact of switching to LCPT on tremor and quality of life (QoL) in a larger population of stable kidney transplant patients. The primary endpoint was change in The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS) score; secondary endpoints included 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12) scores, tacrolimus trough concentrations, neurologic symptoms, and safety assessments. Subgroup analyses were conducted to assess change in TETRAS score and tacrolimus trough concentration/dose (C0/D) ratio by prior tacrolimus formulation and tacrolimus metabolizer status. Among 221 patients, the mean decrease of TETRAS score after switch to LCPT was statistically significant (p < 0.0001 vs. baseline). There was no statistically significant difference in change in TETRAS score after switch to LCPT between patients who had received IR-TAC and those who had received PR-TAC before switch, or between fast and slow metabolizers of tacrolimus. The overall increase of C0/D ratio post-switch to LCPT was statistically significant (p < 0.0001) and from baseline to either M1 or M3 (both p < 0.0001) in the mITT population and in all subgroups. In the fast metabolizers group, the C0/D ratio crossed over the threshold of 1.05ng/mL/mg after the switch to LCPT. Other neurologic symptoms tended to improve, and the SF-12 mental component summary score improved significantly. No new safety concerns were evident. In this observational study, all patients had a significant improvement of tremor, QoL and C0/D ratio post-switch to LCPT irrespective of the previous tacrolimus formulation administered (IR-TAC or PR-TAC) and irrespective from their metabolism status (fast or slow metabolizers).

P.25: Pharmacokinetic (PK) levels before and after conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus to once-daily extended-release tacrolimus (LCPT) in SPK transplant recipients

P.25: Pharmacokinetic (PK) levels before and after conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus to once-daily extended-release tacrolimus (LCPT) in SPK transplant recipients

A Low Tacrolimus Concentration-to-Dose Ratio Increases Calcineurin Inhibitor Nephrotoxicity and Cytomegalovirus Infection Risks in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Study in Japan

Tacrolimus (TAC) has several problems due to its narrow therapeutic window and variations pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Recently, several studies reported that TAC metabolism, defined by TAC blood trough concentration to dose (C/D) ratio, was associated with TAC toxicity. Reports on once-daily extended-release TAC (TAC-ER) are limited. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of the TAC metabolic rate on TAC-ER and compare TAC area under the curve (AUC) between fast and slow metabolizers. A total of 58 recipients were included in this study. The optimal cut-off value and time of the C/D ratio on TAC-ER for fast and slow metabolizers was determined using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for biopsy-proven calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity. The optimal time to evaluate the C/D ratio was 1 month after kidney transplantation (KT) and the cut-off value was 0.9. The multivariate analysis for CNI nephrotoxicity risk showed that only TAC metabolism was associated with CNI nephrotoxicity (hazard ratio 10.60, P=.005, 95% CI 2.03-55.22). Cytomegalovirus infection occurred more frequently in fast metabolizers when the cut-off value of the C/D ratio was set to 0.9 at 3 months after KT (P=.04). The TAC C4, AUC2-8, was higher in fast metabolizers than in slow metabolizers (P < .01, P=.03, respectively). The study revealed that TAC fast metabolizers on TAC-ER may be classified as a high-risk group for CNI nephrotoxicity and cytomegalovirus infection. The result of TAC AUC supported the hypothesis that fast metabolizers tended to be overexposed to immunosuppressive agents early after oral administration.

Two-year outcomes of low-exposure extended-release tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil regimen in de novo kidney transplantation: A multi-center randomized controlled trial.

Once-daily extended-release tacrolimus (TACER) is commonly administered following kidney transplantation (KTx); however, its optimal dosage remains unknown. In this multi-center, randomized controlled trial, 62 living donor KTx recipients were assigned to either standard-exposure (SE; n=32) or low-exposure (LE; n=30) TACER (Graceptor®, Astellas Pharm Inc.) groups. All patients received basiliximab and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). The primary outcomes were acute rejection, graft/patient survival, and the secondary outcomes were incidence of cytomegalovirus infection, and de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) production. The tacrolimus trough level and estimated area under the blood concentration-time curve (eAUC) were significantly higher in SE than in LE (SE vs. LE; 1 year: 5.0 ± 0.9ng/ml and 206.9 ± 26.8 ng h/ml vs. 3.4 ± 1.0ng/ml and 153.9 ± 26.4 ng h/ml; 2 years: 4.8 ± 1.0ng/ml and 204.9 ± 30.1 ng h/ml vs. 3.8 ± 0.9ng/ml and 164.4 ± 27.0 ng h/ml). In contrast, the dosage and eAUC of MMF did not differ between groups. Two-year graft and patient survival rates were 100% in both groups, and acute rejection rates were 0% and 10% in the SE and LE, respectively (p=0.11). The mean estimated glomerular filtration rates did not differ between the groups. Cytomegalovirus infection was slightly lower in the LE (SE: 12.5% and LE: 6.7%, p=0.37). In the LE, four cases of dnDSA were noted within 2 years of transplantation; no case was observed in the SE (p=0.034). Although the LE TACER regimen showed similar rates of acute rejection, as well as graft and patient survival compared with SE after KTx, LE was significantly more associated with dnDSA. Further investigation of its long-term effect on graft survival is warranted. (University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry ID: UMIN000033089).

POSB119 Economic Impact of Once-Daily MeltDose Extended-Release Tacrolimus (LCP-TAC) in Patients with Kidney or Liver Transplantation in Spain

Tacrolimus is an immunosuppression drug widely used for prevention of allograft rejection in kidney and liver transplantations. The once-daily extended-release tacrolimus (LCP-Tac) is a novel formulation for tacrolimus, differentiated by using the MeltDose technology which was designed to enhance the bioavailability of drugs with low water solubility. This study assessed the economic impact of the use LCP-Tac compared with other once-daily extended-release tacrolimus (PR-Tac) and with twice-daily immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac) in patients with kidney or liver transplantation.

Cost-effectiveness of once-daily vs twice-daily tacrolimus among Hispanic and Black kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Tacrolimus is a first-line immunosuppressive therapy to prevent rejection and graft failure in kidney transplant recipients. Once-daily extended-release tacrolimus tablets (LCPT) have been shown to be efficacious, particularly for Hispanic and Black patient subpopulations who are rapid metabolizers, but is more costly than twice-daily immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of LCPT during the first year of treatment vs IR-Tac in kidney transplant recipients who are Hispanic or Black. METHODS: A decision analytic model from a US payer perspective was developed using (1) subgroup outcomes data pooled from two phase 3 clinical trials that compared LCPT and IR-Tac, and (2) direct costs from real-world data sources (ie, costs of LCPT and IR-Tac treatments, biopsy-proven acute rejection, treatment-related serious adverse events [SAEs], graft failure, and consequent dialysis). The primary outcome was cost per successfully treated patient, defined as having a functioning graft after 1 year and without treatment-related SAEs. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses established distributions for cost and outcomes estimates, and a series of one-way sensitivity analyses identified parameters that had the most effect on results. RESULTS: Total overall cost for the Hispanic group was $14,765 for LCPT and $12,416 for IR-Tac, and total cost in the Black group was $16,626 for LCPT and $9,871 for IR-Tac. Total overall effectiveness of LCPT and IR-Tac was 88.32% and 84.75% in the Hispanic group and 93.24% and 85.78% in the Black group, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for using LCPT over IR-Tac during the first year of treatment in the Hispanic group was $65,643 per additional successfully treated patient. The ICER for the Black group was $90,458. The single parameter having the most impact on results in both groups was the probability of a treatment-related SAE in IR-Tac, which accounted for 49% of variation in results in the Hispanic group and 46% in the Black group. CONCLUSIONS: Overall results for both groups show that LCPT is incrementally more costly and more effective compared with IR-Tac, indicating a trade-off scenario. LCPT is a cost-effective strategy if a decision makers' willingness to pay for 1 additional successfully treated patient exceeds the ICER and must be weighed against the costs of graft loss, continuing dialysis, and potential retransplant. This study provides a foundation for further research to update and expand inputs as more data become available to improve real-world relevance and decision making. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Veloxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., which provided clinical trial file data and nonbinding feedback on the model structure, data interpretation, clinical expertise, manuscript review, and areas of publication interest (ie, managed care). Hurwitz, Grizzle, Villa Zapata, and Malone received grant funding from Veloxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., through University of Arizona to conduct research and analysis for this study. Tyler is employed by Veloxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Some of the data reported and used in this research were available from the US Renal Data System, the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Healthcare Cost and Utility Project. The interpretation and reporting of these data are the responsibility of the authors and in no way should be seen as an official policy or interpretation of the US government.

Effect of CYP3A5 on the Once-Daily Tacrolimus Conversion in Stable Liver Transplant Patients.

Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A5 polymorphism influences tacrolimus metabolism, but its effect on the drug pharmacokinetics in liver transplant recipients switched to once-daily extended-release formulation remains unknown. The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of CYP3A5 polymorphism on liver function after once-daily tacrolimus conversion in liver transplant patients. A prospective open-label study included 60 stable liver transplant recipients who underwent 1:1 conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus to once-daily tacrolimus. All participants were genotyped for CYP3A5 polymorphism. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT 02882113). Twenty-eight patients were enrolled in the CYP3A5 expressor group and 32 in the non-expressor group. Although there was no statistical difference, incidence of liver dysfunction was higher in the expressor group than in the non-expressor group when converted to once-daily extended-release tacrolimus (p = 0.088). No biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft failure, and mortality were observed in either group. The decrease in dose-adjusted trough level (−42.9% vs. −26.1%) and dose/kg-adjusted trough level of tacrolimus (−40.0% vs. −23.7%) was significantly greater in the expressor group than in the non-expressors after the conversion. A pharmacokinetic analysis was performed in 10 patients and tacrolimus absorption in the non-expressor group was slower than in the expressor group. In line with this observation, the area under the curve for once-daily tacrolimus correlated with trough level (Cmin) in the non-expressors and peak concentration (Cmax) in the expressors. CYP3A5 genotyping in liver transplant recipients leads to prediction of pharmacokinetics after switching from a twice-daily regimen to a once-daily dosage form, which makes it possible to establish an appropriate dose of tacrolimus.

Sequential Cohort Analysis After Liver Transplantation Shows de Novo Extended Release Tacrolimus Is Safe, Efficacious, and Minimizes Renal Dysfunction

We conducted a single-center, prospective sequential cohort analysis of adult patients undergoing LT during a change in protocol from de novo BDT to ERT, with a 6-month post-LT follow-up. A total of 160 transplanted patients were evaluated; 82 were in the BDT group and 78 were in the ERT group. The cohorts were matched for standard variables and a similar proportion in each group received induction interleukin-2 receptor antibody (36% and 31%). There were no significant differences in the measured outcomes of patient and graft survival, biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes, post LT diabetes, and toxicity. A significantly lower number of patients developed chronic kidney disease Stage3-4 in the ERT cohort compared with BDT cohort. In patients with pre-LT renal dysfunction who received antibody induction, estimated glomerular filtration rate decreased significantly in the BDT but not the ERT group. We show that once-daily ERT is as safe and efficacious as BDT in de novo LT but optimally conserves renal function post-LT.

Evaluation of the Adequacy of the Dosage Conversion Ratio in Switching from Twice-Daily Tacrolimus to Once-Daily Extended-Release Tacrolimus

Evaluation of the Adequacy of the Dosage Conversion Ratio in Switching from Twice-Daily Tacrolimus to Once-Daily Extended-Release Tacrolimus

Single Centre Experience with the use of Envarsus in Pediatric Kidney Transplant Population

Introduction There is no published experience with the use of Meltdose Tacrolimus (M-TAC) in pediatric transplant population. Theoretically, this new drug should not only improve adherence to treatment, but it could also offer better pharmacokinetics than once-daily extended-release tacrolimus (ER-TAC) with less side effects. Patients and Methods This is a retrospective study of a single centre experience with the use of M-TAC in pediatric stable kidney transplant recipients who were selectively converted from other tacrolimus (TAC) formulae to M-TAC. Sixteen patients (44% boys, mean age at transplant 9.3∓5.6 years, mean time after transplant of 2.7 years) were switched from Advagraf(R) or Prograf(R) to M-TAC. The reasons for conversion were: improve TAC pharmacokinetics (56%), improve patient's adherence to treatment (25%) or reduce TAC adverse events (19%). The immunossupression regime prior to conversion was TAC and prednisone based-triple therapy in 81% of them and double therapy in 19%. Results Mean pre-conversion TAC dose was 7.03∓4.3 mg/day. Mean post-conversion TAC dose was 5.03∓2.9 mg/day, with a mean Conversion Factor of 0.73∓0.08. Mean pre-conversion TAC through blood level was 7.52∓2.75 ng/ml (range 4.4 - 12.7) and the post-conversion mean level was 7.81∓2.78 ng/ml (range 3.2 - 15.4) At a mean time of 15 months of follow-up after conversion 94% of the patients are still on M-TAC treatment. A new onset diabetes (NODAT) was diagnosed 3 months after conversion and it disappeared after the M-TAC withdrawal. No clinical acute rejection events have been diagnosed after the conversion in this population. No beneficial effect was observed in 3 patients who persist showing high variability on TAC through blood levels.Conclusions The switch from other TAC formulae to Meltdose TAC using the recommended conversion factor of 0.7 can be safely done also in children. The through blood levels obtained after conversion are quite predictable and stable. The switch can be done without increasing the risk of rejection episodes.

Results of ASERTAA, a Randomized Prospective Crossover Pharmacogenetic Study of Immediate-Release Versus Extended-Release Tacrolimus in African American Kidney Transplant Recipients

Differences in tacrolimus dosing across ancestries is partly attributable to polymorphisms in CYP3A5 genes that encode tacrolimus-metabolizing cytochrome P450 3A5 enzymes. The CYP3A5*1 allele, preponderant in African Americans, is associated with rapid metabolism, subtherapeutic concentrations, and higher dose requirements for tacrolimus, all contributing to worse outcomes. Little is known about the relationship between CYP3A5 genotype and the tacrolimus pharmacokinetic area under the curve (AUC) profile in African Americans or whether pharmacogenetic differences exist between conventional twice-daily, rapidly absorbed, immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac) and once-daily extended-release tacrolimus (LifeCycle Pharma Tac [LCPT]) with a delayed absorption profile. Randomized prospective crossover study. 50 African American maintenance kidney recipients on stable IR-Tac dosing. Recipients were randomly assigned to continue IR-Tac on days 1 to 7 and then switch to LCPT on day 8 or receive LCPT on days 1 to 7 and then switch to IR-Tac on day 8. The LCPT dose was 85% of the IR-Tac total daily dose. Tacrolimus 24-hour AUC (AUC0-24), peak and trough concentrations (Cmax and Cmin), time to peak concentration, and bioavailability of LCPT versus IR-Tac, according to CYP3A5 genotype. CYP3A5 genotype, 24-hour tacrolimus pharmacokinetic profiles. ∼80% of participants carried the CYP3A5*1 allele (CYP3A5 expressers). There were no significant differences in AUC0-24 or Cmin between CYP3A5 expressers and nonexpressers during administration of either IR-Tac or LCPT. With IR-Tac, tacrolimus Cmax was 33% higher in CYP3A5 expressers compared with nonexpressers (P=0.04): With LCPT, this difference was 11% (P=0.4). This was primarily a pharmacogenetic study rather than an efficacy study; the follow-up period was too short to capture clinical outcomes. Achieving therapeutic tacrolimus trough concentrations with IR-Tac in most African Americans results in significantly higher peak concentrations, potentially magnifying the risk for toxicity and adverse outcomes. This pharmacogenetic effect is attenuated by delayed tacrolimus absorption with LCPT. Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, with study number NCT01962922.

Conversion From Once-Daily Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus to Once-Daily Extended-Release Tacrolimus in Stable Liver Transplant Recipients.

After organ transplant, strategies to simplify the therapeutic regimen may improve adherence and prevent rejection and/or graft loss. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety of conversion from once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus (Advagraf; Astellas Pharma Europe Limited, Middlesex, UK) to once-daily extended-release tacrolimus (Envarsus; Chiesi SAS, Nanterre, France) in stable adult liver transplant recipients. This observational study inclu-ded 44 liver transplant patients (median age of 59 y; 63.6% men; median delay after transplant of 72.5 mo). Conversion was based on a 1:0.70 proportion. Mean dose of tacrolimus was 2.65 ± 1.24 mg/day before conversion and 2.09 ± 1.68 mg/day after conversion (P < .05), with ratio of 1:0.79. Mean serum tacrolimus trough level increased after conversion (4.92 ± 1.65 vs 5.60 ± 2.89 ng/mL; P < .05), with ratio of 1:1.14. Six months after conversion, mean dose of tacrolimus was 1.65 ± 0.93 mg/day (ratio of 1:0.62) and mean serum tacrolimus trough level was 4.82 ± 1.85 ng/mL, similar to the initial level before conversion. At the end of follow-up, 2 patients had returned to once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus because of adverse effects (allergy, digestive trouble), which resolved thereafter. The mean cost of tacrolimus therapy was 5.54 ± 2.29 Euros/patient/day before conversion and 4.11 ± 2.32 Euros/patient/day after conversion (P < .05). Conversion from prolonged-release to extended-release tacrolimus in stable liver transplant patients is safe and cost-effective; however, initially, dose adaptations and careful monitoring are required.

A Steady-State Head-to-Head Pharmacokinetic Comparison of All FK-506 (Tacrolimus) Formulations (ASTCOFF): An Open-Label, Prospective, Randomized, Two-Arm, Three-Period Crossover Study.

This two‐sequence, three‐period crossover study is the first pharmacokinetic (PK) study to compare all three innovator formulations of tacrolimus (twice‐daily immediate‐release tacrolimus capsules [IR‐Tac]; once‐daily extended‐release tacrolimus capsules [ER‐Tac]; novel once‐daily tacrolimus tablets [LCPT]). Stable renal transplant patients were dosed with each drug for 7 days, and blood samples were obtained over 24 h. Thirty subjects were included in the PK analysis set. A conversion factor of 1:1:0.80 for IR‐Tac:ER‐Tac:LCPT was used; no dose adjustments were permitted during the study. The median (interquartile range) total daily dose was 6.0 (4.0–8.0) mg for IR‐Tac and ER‐Tac and 4.8 (3.3–6.3) for LCPT. Significantly higher exposure on a per milligram basis, lower intraday fluctuation and prolonged time (Tmax) to peak concentration (Cmax) were found for LCPT versus IR‐Tac or ER‐Tac. ER‐Tac showed no differences versus IR‐Tac in exposure, Cmax, Tmax or fluctuation. The observed exposure of IR‐Tac was used to normalize exposure for LCPT and ER‐Tac, resulting in the following recommended total daily dose conversion rates: IR‐Tac:ER‐Tac, +8%; IR‐Tac:LCPT, −30%; ER‐Tac:LCPT, −36%. After exposure normalization, Cmax was ~17% lower for LCPT than for IR‐Tac or ER‐Tac; Cmin was ~6% lower for LCPT compared with IR‐Tac and 3% higher compared with ER‐Tac.

Novel Once-Daily Extended-Release Tacrolimus Versus Twice-Daily Tacrolimus in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients: Two-Year Results of Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial

1-year data from this trial showed the noninferiority of a novel once-daily extended-release tacrolimus (LCPT; Envarsus XR) to immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac) twice daily after kidney transplantation. Final 24-month analysis of a 2-armed, parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, phase 3 trial. 543 de novo kidney recipients randomly assigned to LCPT (n=268) or IR-Tac (n=275); 507 (93.4%) completed the 24-month study. LCPT tablets once daily at 0.17 mg/kg/d or IR-Tac twice daily at 0.1 mg/kg/d; subsequent doses were adjusted to maintain target trough ranges (first 30 days, 6-11 ng/mL; thereafter, 4-11 ng/mL). The intervention was 24 months; the study was double blinded for the entirety. Treatment failure (death, transplant failure, biopsy-proven acute rejection, or loss to follow up) within 24 months. Safety end points included adverse events, serious adverse events, new-onset diabetes, kidney function, opportunistic infections, and malignancies. Pharmacokinetic measures included total daily dose (TDD) of study drugs and tacrolimus trough levels. 24-month treatment failure was LCPT, 23.1%; IR-Tac, 27.3% (treatment difference, -4.14% [95% CI, -11.38% to +3.17%], well below the +10% noninferiority criterion defined for the primary 12-month end point). Subgroup analyses showed fewer treatment failures for LCPT versus IR-Tac among black, older, and female recipients. Safety was similar between groups. From month 1, TDD was lower for LCPT; the difference increased over time. At month 24, mean TDD for LCPT was 24% lower than for the IR-Tac group (P<0.001), but troughs were similar (means at 24 months: LCPT, 5.47 ± 0.17 ng/mL; IR-Tac, 5.8 ± 0.30 ng/mL; P=0.4). Trial participant eligibility criteria may limit the generalizability of results to the global population of de novo kidney transplant recipients. Results suggest that once-daily LCPT in de novo kidney transplantation has comparable efficacy and safety profile to that of IR-Tac. Lower TDD reflects LCPT's improved bioavailability and absorption.

Conversion of twice-daily to once-daily tacrolimus is safe in stable adult living donor liver transplant recipients

Once-daily extended-release tacrolimus (Tac-OD) has been introduced as a useful therapeutic option to increase patient adherence to immunosuppressive therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the safety, efficacy and immunosuppressant adherence of conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus (Tac-BID) to Tac-OD in stable adult living donor liver transplant (LDLT) recipients in a single institution. Between February and May 2013, Tac-BID was converted to Tac-OD in recipients followed up for at least 12 months after transplantation and without previous rejection episodes. The switching policy was based on a dose ratio of 1:1 with dose adjustment target trough levels at 3-5 ng/mL. Tacrolimus trough levels, laboratory parameters, metabolic disorders, and adverse events were assessed. A total of 229 patients were enrolled in the study. The median age at conversion was 53 years (range 31-73). The median transplant duration was 35.3 months (range 12.0-95.4). During a median follow-up of 13.5 months after conversion, 9 patients returned to Tac-BID because of adverse events. No acute rejection episodes were observed. Of 214 patients still on Tac-OD at 12 months, 12 (5.6%) received a reduced dose and 95 (44.4%) required an increased dose over baseline. Overall adherence was 82.2% at the end of follow-up. The conversion from Tac-BID to Tac-OD with similar target trough levels after conversion is safe and effective for long-term stable LDLT patients.

Novel Once-Daily Extended-Release Tacrolimus (LCPT) Versus Twice-Daily Tacrolimus in De Novo Kidney Transplants: One-Year Results of Phase III, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial

This Phase III randomized trial examined efficacy and safety of a novel once-daily extended-release tacrolimus formulation (LCP-Tacro [LCPT]) versus twice-daily tacrolimus in de novo kidney transplantation. Primary efficacy end point was proportion of patients with treatment failure (death, graft failure, biopsy-proven acute rejection or lost to follow-up) within 12 months. Starting doses were, LCPT: 0.17 mg/kg/day and tacrolimus twice-daily: 0.1 mg/kg/day; 543 patients were randomized, LCPT: n = 268; tacrolimus twice-daily: n = 275. At 12 months treatment failure was LCPT: 18.3% and tacrolimus twice-daily: 19.6%; the upper 95% CI of the treatment difference was +5.27%, below the predefined +10% noninferiority criteria. There were no significant differences in the incidence of individual efficacy events or adverse events. Target tacrolimus trough levels were more rapidly achieved in the LCPT group. Following initial dose, 36.6% of patients in the LCPT group had rapidly attained trough levels within 6-11 ng/mL versus 18.5% of tacrolimus twice-daily patients; majority of tacrolimus twice-daily patients (74.7%) had troughs <6 ng/mL compared with 33.5% in the LCPT group. Overall, cumulative study dose was 14% lower for LCPT. Results suggest that use of once-daily LCPT in de novo kidney transplantation is efficacious and safe. Lower LCPT dose reflects the improved absorption provided by the novel formulation.

One Agent-Once a Day: 2 Year Outcomes of a Prospective Randomized Trial of Once Daily (Extended Release) Tacrolimus Maintenance Monotherapy vs Twice Daily (Standard Release) Tacrolimus After Alemtuzumab Induction &amp; Early Steroid Cessation (TAESR Trial). Rejection and Variation in Tacrolimus Levels.

Introduction: The availability of once-daily extended-release tacrolimus (Advagraf), provides the opportunity to develop a one-agent, once-a-day, maintenance immunosuppressive regimen from the well established combination of tacrolimus monotherapy after alemtuzumab induction with early steroid cessation. Methods: We have undertaken a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing graft and patient outcomes, and tacrolimus trough level intra-patient variability with once vs twice daily tacrolimus monotherapy (n=52 vs 50 patients). Results: At 2 years post-transplant, patient survival, graft survival, and the incidence of all rejection (biopsy proven acute cellular, and acute and chronic antibody mediated) did not differ significantly between the two arms:Table: No Caption available.Intra-patient variability (coefficient of variation) of tacrolimus levels did not differ significantly between the two groups, although after the first year post-transplant there was a trend to increased variability in the twice daily, standard release group, and decreasing variability in the once daily, extended release group.Figure: No Caption available.Conclusions: Once daily extended release tacrolimus provideds safe and effective maintenance monotherapy after alemtuzumab induction and early steroid cessation, with graft and patient survival, and rejection levels comparable to twice daily, standard release tacrolimus. DISCLOSURES:McLean, A.: Grant/Research Support, Astellas pharma UK.

Conversion from twice-daily to once-daily extended-release tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients: 2-year results and review of the literature.

Tacrolimus extended-release formulation has been approved for use in Canada since October 2008. In initial studies, efficacy and safety profile were demonstrated as similar for both formulations (twice-daily tacrolimus and extended-release formula tacrolimus). To validate the safety and efficacy of extended-release formula tacrolimus, we conducted a prospective observational study. At our institution, between January 2009 and January 2010, the switch from tacrolimus to extended-release formula tacrolimus was done in 130 stable kidney recipients. Clinical data were accessed at baseline (data before conversion), 1 to 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after conversion. One hundred thirty renal transplant recipients were included in the current study. During the observation period, we saw no acute rejection and no change in graft function (mean serum creatinine levels remained stable). However, compared with baseline, mean tacrolimus trough levels were significantly reduced at 1 to 2 weeks, at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and at 24 months after conversion. Regarding the safety profile, no significant changes were noted in blood glucose, potassium, and magnesium. Approximately 35% of recipients preferred the extended-release formula tacrolimus to twice-daily tacrolimus. Conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus to extended-release once-daily tacrolimus appears to be safe and convenient up to 2 years after conversion in some recipients.

A prospective cohort conversion study of twice-daily to once-daily extended-release tacrolimus: role of ethnicity

BackgroundTacrolimus is a widely used calcineurin inhibitor in kidney transplantation. It is available as twice-daily Prograf® (Tac-BID) and once-daily Advagraf® (Tac-OD). Although therapeutically equivalent, some patients require dose adjustments to achieve similar trough concentrations [C0] after conversion. Tacrolimus exposure is affected by ethnicity in the de novo setting but the role of ethnicity in determining dose requirements and adjustments after conversion is unknown.MethodsIn this study, 496 renal transplant recipients (RTRs) were prospectively converted from Tac-BID to Tac-OD, with dose adjustments targeted to achieve similar [C0] at 12 months post-conversion. Renal function, acute rejection and Tac dose adjustments by ethnicity were analyzed.ResultsThere were similar numbers of recipients from living and deceased donors. The mean transplant duration was 7 years. Of the RTRs, 60% were Caucasian and 40% were identified as belonging to an ethnic minority. There was no change in estimated renal function (eGFR) post-conversion to Tac-OD. At 12 months, 35/488 (7%) RTRs were receiving a reduced dose, 101/488 (21%) required a dose increase of which 77 (16%) were receiving at least a 30% increase in dose over baseline. The percentage of those in ethnic groups requiring a dose increase of >30% varied from 8.0% for South Asians to 27.5% for East Asians (P = 0.03), despite East Asians having a similar baseline dose of Tac-BID (3.59 mg/day) compared to the entire cohort (3.53 mg/day).ConclusionsEthnicity may play an important role in dosing requirements when converting from Tac-BID to Tac-OD, unrelated to baseline dose. Further investigation is required to determine the reasons for ethnic variability when patients are converted between tacrolimus preparations.

A Switch From Conventional Twice-Daily Tacrolimus to Once-Daily Extended-Release Tacrolimus in Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients

BackgroundExtended-release tacrolimus (TAC-ER) was developed to provide a more convenient treatment compliance and improve safety by avoiding toxic peak levels. We prospectively evaluated the safety and effectiveness of a 1:1 dose switch from twice-daily tacrolimus to once-daily TAC-ER in stable kidney transplant recipients and assessed their satisfaction with the regimen. Patients and methodsTacrolimus was switched to TAC-ER (1:1 dose) in 12 kidney transplant recipients with stable renal function from March 2010 to August 2011. The posttransplantation follow-up period was 7.6 ± 4.3 years (range 1.5–13.2 years). No patient had diabetes mellitus in this group. We evaluated the tacrolimus trough levels, serum creatinine, potassium, glucose, glycohemoglobin (HbA1c), and urine protein concentrations once a month from 6 months prior to 1 year after switching. A satisfaction survey for TAC-ER treatment was performed 3 months after the switch. The questionnaire included administration compliance questions such as “forget to take less often,” “easy to carry,” “easy to store,” and “general satisfaction.” ResultsAfter the switch to TAC-ER, we observed a quick and sustained 25% decrease in TAC trough levels from 4.8 ± 1.0 to 3.6 ± 0.8 (P = .0002). No significant differences in serum creatinine, potassium, glucose, HbA1c, or urine protein concentration were observed during the 14.6 ± 2.6 months' follow-up period. No recipient experienced acute rejection. The satisfaction survey demonstrated that the stable kidney transplant recipients were satisfied with the switch. ConclusionsA switch from twice-daily tacrolimus to once-daily TAC-ER (1:1 dose) was safe and effective. TAC-ER can improve treatment compliance in stable kidney transplant recipients.