Online Hemodiafiltration Research Articles

Removal performance of pre- and post-dilution online hemodiafiltration using identical hemodiafilters in the same patients

Online hemodiafiltration (OHDF) for renal replacement therapy has two modes: pre- (pre-OHDF) and post-dilution OHDF (post-OHDF). To elucidate the precise differences between the two modes, a clinical study was performed using the same polysulfone hemodiafilters in the same patients. Eight patients were treated with ABH™-22PA for 6 weeks: 3 weeks of pre-OHDF (with substitution volumes of 24, 36, and 48 L) and 3 weeks of post-OHDF (6, 8, and 10 L). The reduction ratios of urea, uric acid (UA), creatinine (CRE), inorganic phosphorus (iP), beta-2-microglobulin (β2-MG), and alpha-1-microglobulin (α1-MG) were evaluated. The removal amounts of β2-MG, α1-MG, and albumin were also evaluated by analyzing the spent dialysis fluids. The types and numbers of adverse events (AEs) and device malfunctions were recorded. The reduction ratios of urea, UA, CRE, iP, and β2-MG were comparable among all conditions, while that of α1-MG tended to be slightly higher in post-OHDF than in pre-OHDF. The removal amounts of α1-MG and albumin in pre-OHDF and post-OHDF were significantly greater with the maximum substitution volume than with the minimum volume. However, the selective removal indices, which were obtained by dividing the amount of α1-MG removed by the albumin level, tended to be slightly higher in pre- than in post-OHDF. No device-related AEs or device malfunctions occurred in either mode. No significant differences in inflammatory responses, evaluated by high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and interleukin-6, were observed. This study provides removal performance and safety data regarding the application of ABH-22PA for pre- and post-OHDF.

Comparison of 2 medium cutoff dialyzers versus on-line hemodiafiltration regarding depurative ability and albumin loss: An uncontrolled clinical research.

Hemodialysis (HD) techniques that best remove molecules in the middle to high molecular weight range are on-line hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) and HD with medium cut-off (MCO) membranes. The aim of this study was to compare efficacy and safety of OL-HDF with FxCordiax HDF 800™, with HD with 2 MCO dialyzers: Theranova 500® and the new Elisio 21HX™ dialyzer. Fourteen patients following treatment with OL-HDF using FxCordiax HDF 800™ were randomized to receive a consecutive 1-week HD treatment with Theranova 500® and Elisio 21HX™.The reduction rate (RR) of differently sized molecules was compared, as well as the variation rate in molecules smaller than 1000, detected by nuclear magnetic resonance based chemometrics (metabolomics). Albumin loss in dialysate was quantified. Lower RRs were found for molecules around 20 000 with Elisio 21HX™ compared to OL- HDF (RR prolactin 58.5% versus 66.7%, p=0.034; RR Kappa light chain 63.1% versus 71.8%, p=0.010). Albumin loss per session was higher with Theranova 500® than with OL-HDF and with Elisio 21HX™ (2249.9 ± 714.1mg, 815.2 ± 474.0mg, 442.9 ± 135.9mg, p < 0.001, respectively). Metabolomic studies suggested, by semi-quantitative analysis, a greater depurative capacity of OL-HDF, followed by Elisio 21HX™, and then Theranova 500®. In this study, HD with Theranova 500® has proven to be very similar in efficacy to OL-HDF, although with a significantly higher albumin loss. HD with Elisio 21HX™ resulted in lower removal of molecules around 20 000 compared to OL-HDF, with no significant difference compared to Theranova 500®, and with less albumin loss than Theranova 500®.

α1- and β2-Microglobulin reduction ratios and survival in patients on predilution online haemodiafiltration.

β2-Microglobulin (β2-MG) and α1-microglobulin (α1-MG) have molecular weights of 11,800 and 33,000 Da, respectively. We studied the α1-MG and β2-MG reduction ratios (RRs) and survival in patients on predilution online haemodiafiltration (Pre-OL-HDF). Participants were 247 Pre-OL-HDF patients. α1-MG and β2-MG RRs were assessed at baseline. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazard analyses were used. In 247 patients, the median age was 67 (56-73) years, the dialysis duration was 77 (46-150) months, and the diabetes prevalence was 47.4%. Twenty-two patients died over the 450-day study period. The mortality cut-off values using receiver-operating characteristic curves for the α1-MG and β2-MG RRs were 20% and 80%, respectively. Survival rates were significantly (p < 0.05) higher in patients with α1-MG RRs ≥20% (n=134) compared with patients with α1-MG RRs <20% (n=113) and in patients with β2-MG RRs ≥80% (n=87) compared with patients with β2-MG RRs <80% (n=160). Cox models adjusting for diabetes and dialysis duration showed that α1-MG RR, β2-MG RR, and pre- and postdialysis β2-MG were risk factors for all-cause mortality; however, after additional adjustment for age, sex, and serum albumin, only β2-MG RR and pre- and postdialysis β2-MG were significant predictors of mortality (p < 0.05). α1-MG RRs were significantly correlated with β2-MG RRs (ρ=0.73, p < 0.0001) and serum albumin levels (ρ=0.13, p < 0.05). In patients on Pre-OL-HDF, α1-MG RRs ≥20% and β2-MG RRs ≥80% were associated with better survival, β2-MG RR ≥80% and pre-and postdialysis β2-MG levels were significant predictors of all-cause mortality, and α1-MG RR ≥20% may predict mortality.

Post-dialysis fatigue: Comparison of bicarbonate hemodialysis and online hemodiafiltration.

The present cross-sectional study aimed to compare the prevalence, the characteristics of post-dialysis fatigue and the length of recovery time after hemodialysis in prevalent end-stage renal disease patients (ESRD) receiving bicarbonate hemodialysis (HD) or hemodiafiltration (HDF). Patients were suffering from post-dialysis fatigue if they spontaneously offered this complaint when asked the open-ended question: "Do you feel fatigued after dialysis?". Moreover, each patient was invited to rate the intensity, duration, and frequency of post-dialysis fatigue from 1 to 5. In order to assess RECOVERY TIME AFTER DIALYSIS, patients were invited to answer to the following single open-ended question: "How long does it take you to recover from a dialysis session?" We included 335 patients: 252 received HD and 83 received HDF. Post-dialysis fatigue was present in 204 patients (60.9%). Prevalence of post-dialysis fatigue did not differ significantly between patients on HD (62.3%) and on HDF (56.6%; p=0.430). Median recovery time after dialysis was 180 min [180-240] and did not differ significantly between the two subgroups (180 min [130-240] and 240 min [120-332] p=0.671, respectively). Median post-dialysis fatigue intensity, duration, and frequency were 3 [1-5], 3 [1-5], and 4 [1-5] and did not differ significantly between patients on HD and on HDF. At the multivariate analysis, age, ADL and hemoglobin levels were the independent predictors of the HDF treatment. Prevalence and characteristics of post-dialysis fatigue do not differ significantly between patients receiving bicarbonate HD or HDF.

The Medium Cut-Off Membrane Does Not Lower Protein-Bound Uremic Toxins.

The accumulation of protein-bound uremic toxins (PBUT) is associated with increased cardiovascular outcomes in patients on dialysis. However, the efficacy of PBUT removal for a medium-cutoff (MCO) membrane has not been clarified. This study was designed to assess the efficacy of PBUT clearance according to dialysis modalities. In this prospective and cross-over study, we enrolled 22 patients who received maintenance hemodiafiltration (HDF) thrice weekly from three dialysis centers. The dialysis removal of uremic toxins, including urea, beta 2-microglobulin (B2MG), lambda free light chain (λ-FLC), indoxyl sulfate (IS), and p-cresyl sulfate (pCS), was measured in the 22 patients on high-flux HD (HF-HD), post-dilution online HDF (post-OL-HDF), and MCO-HD over 3 weeks. The average convection volume in post-OL-HDF was 21.4 ± 1.8 L per session. The reduction rate (RR) of B2MG was higher in post-OL-HDF than in MCO-HD and HF-HD. The RR of λ-FLC was the highest in MCO-HD, followed by post-OL-HDF and HF-HD. The dialysate albumin was highest in MCO-HD, followed by post-OL-HDF and HF-HD. Post-dialysis plasma levels of IS and pCS were not statistically different across dialysis modalities. The total solute removal and dialytic clearance of IS and pCS were not significantly different. The clearance of IS and pCS did not differ between the HF-HD, post-OL-HDF, and MCO-HD groups.

Anti-Inflammatory Approach in Chronic Dialysis Patients with SARS-CoV-2: ATA or PMMA Dialyzers?

Introduction: High-flux hemodialysis membranes may modulate the cytokine storm of SARS-CoV-2, but their impact on chronic hemodialysis (CHD) patients is unknown. The aim of the study was the evaluation of asymmetric cellulose triacetate (ATA) and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) dialyzers on inflammatory markers and clinical outcomes in CHD patients with SARS-CoV-2. Methods: A prospective, observational study on CHD patients with SARS-CoV-2 was carried out. Patients were enrolled from March 2020 to May 2021. Pre- and postdialysis C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were determined at each session. Patients who underwent on-line hemodiafiltration (OLHDF) with a PMMA dialyzer were compared with those treated with OLHDF with a ATA dialyzer. The primary endpoint was the differences in the reduction ratio per session (RR) of CRP, PCT, IL-6, and IL-6 RR >25%. Results: We consecutively enrolled 74 CHD patients with COVID-19, 48 were treated with ATA membrane, and 26 with PMMA. Median IL-6 RR was higher in the ATA group compared to PMMA (17.08%, IQR −9.0 to 40.0 vs. 2.95%, IQR −34.63 to 27.32). Median CRP RR was 7.77% (IQR 2.47–13.77) in the ATA group versus 4.8% (IQR −2.65 to 11.38) in the PMMA group (p = 0.0017). Median PCT-RR% was 77.38% (IQR 70.92–82.97) in ATA group versus 54.59% (IQR 42.62–63.16) in the PMMA group (p < 0.0001). A multiple logistic regression analysis with IL-6 RR >25% as the outcome including the membrane employed, pre-dialysis IL-6, CRP, PCT, and ferritin showed that ATA led to a higher probability to reach the outcome (OR 1.891, 95% CI 1.273–2.840, p = 0.0018) while higher CRP favors the risk of lower IL-6 RR values (OR 0.910, 95% CI 0.868–0.949, p ≤ 0.0001). Conclusions: In SARS-CoV-2 CHD patients treated with OLHDF, ATA showed a better anti-inflammatory profile, regarding IL-6 RR, compared to PMMA.

Comparison of High-Flux, Super High-Flux, Medium Cut-Off Hemodialysis and Online Hemodiafiltration on the Removal of Uremic Toxins

Comparison of High-Flux, Super High-Flux, Medium Cut-Off Hemodialysis and Online Hemodiafiltration on the Removal of Uremic Toxins

Impact of needle type on substitution volume during online hemodiafiltration: plastic cannulae versus metal needles.

Plastic cannulae have attracted increasing interest as an alternative to traditional metal needles with the aim of reducing cannulation-related complications. We investigated whether the substitution volumes during hemodiafiltration differ using these two types of needles in dialysis patients. An intervention study involving 26 hemodialysis patients was conducted in Korea between March and September in 2021. Patients first received online hemodiafiltration using traditional metal needles, and thereafter plastic cannulae were used in a stepwise protocol. Repeated-measures design and linear mixed-effect models were used to compare substitution volumes between the two needle types with the same inner diameter. The mean patient age was 62.7 years, and their mean dialysis vintage was 95.2 months. Most patients (92.3%) had an arteriovenous fistula as the vascular access. The substitution volume increased as blood flow and needle size increased for both plastic cannulae and metal needles. The substitution volume was significantly higher with 17-gauge (G) plastic cannulae than with 16-G metal needles at blood flow rates of 280, 300, and 330 mL/min. Similar results were obtained for 15-G metal needles and 16-G plastic cannulae at a blood flow rate of 330 mL/min. However, the patient ratings of pain on a visual analogue scale were higher for plastic cannulae. Higher substitution volumes were obtained at the same prescribed blood flow rate with plastic cannulae than with metal needles during online hemodiafiltration. Plastic cannulae are an option for achieving high-volume hemodiafiltration for patients with low blood flow rates.

Comparison of High-Flux, Super High-Flux, Medium Cut-Off Hemodialysis and Online Hemodiafiltration on the Removal of Uremic Toxins

Introduction: Online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) and hemodialysis (HD) using high-performance membranes such as adsorptive, medium cut-off (MCO), and super high-flux (SHF) dialyzers have been implemented to enhance the removal of middle molecules (MM). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of different dialysis strategies and dialyzers on small solutes and MM reduction ratio (RR) and mass removal. Methods: We performed a prospective study in 8 HD patients. Each patient underwent 9 dialysis sessions: seven sessions on HD using either Theranova 500™, Elisio 21H™, Renak PS-2.0W™, Filtryzer BK-2.1F™, Vie 21X™, TS-2.1UL™ or FDY 210-GW™ dialyzers and two sessions on OL-HDF using Elisio 21H™ or Renak PS-2.0W™ dialyzers. Results: Urea mass removal and RR were similar between all dialysis strategies. The lowest beta2-microglobulin RR was achieved with Filtryzer BK-2.1F™ HD (p < 0.05). Compared to Elisio 21H™ HD, Renak PS-2.0W™ OL-HDF produced higher beta2-microglobulin mass removal (181 ± 46 vs. 317 ± 161 mg, p < 0.05). Theranova 500™ HD, Vie 21X™ HD, FDY 210-GW™ HD, Elisio 21H™ OL-HDF, and Renak PS-2.0W™ OL-HDF induced higher RR for kappa and lambda FLC, as compared to Elisio 21H™ HD and Filtryzer BK-2.1F™ HD (p < 0.05). Renak PS-2.0W™ OL-HDF achieved higher kappa FLC mass removal compared to Elisio 21H™ HD (563 ± 515 vs. 141 ± 47 mg, p < 0.01) and to Renak PS-2.0W™ HD (563 ± 515 vs. 153 ± 25 mg, p < 0.05). Albumin loss varied from 0.02 ± 0.05 to 7.6 ± 3.8 g/session with Elisio 21H™ HD and Renak PS-2.0W™ OL-HDF, respectively. Compared to all other strategies, Renak PS-2.0W™ OL-HDF induced a significantly higher albumin loss (p < 0.05). Conclusion: This study confirms that albumin loss and removal of MM are similar using conventional Elisio 21H™ OL-HDF, MCO-HD, and SHF type V dialyzers. Although Renak PS-2.0W™ OL-HDF provides high performance for MM depuration, this protein-permeable dialyzer should not be used in OL-HDF because of excessive albumin loss.

Effects of high albumin leakage on survival between online hemodiafiltration and super high-flux hemodialysis: the HISTORY study

BackgroundAll-cause mortality is lower with a high substitution volume in predilution (pre) and postdilution (post) online hemodiafiltration (OHDF) than with hemodialysis (HD), and mortality does not significantly differ between pre- and post-OHDF groups. Despite the improved survival with a high substitution volume, there may be limitations. On the other hand, either normoalbuminemia or high albumin leakage in HD can reduce mortality, and super high-flux (SHF) membrane dialyzers can reduce mortality compared with low-flux and high-flux membrane dialyzers. Here, we investigated the associations of serum albumin concentration (s-Alb), albumin leakage, and substitution volume with all-cause mortality in OHDF and SHF-HD.MethodsIn a 3-year retrospective observational study of patients receiving dialysis from April 1 to July 1, 2017, we developed a propensity score-matched model using 783 stable patients (SHF-HD, 355; OHDF, 428). We used the log-rank test to compare Kaplan–Meier survival curves and Cox regression analysis to calculate hazard ratio (HR). Cox regression analysis was also used to compare the effect of estimated albumin leakage (EAL) and substitution volume on 3-year all-cause mortality.ResultsAll-cause mortality was significantly lower with high EAL than with low EAL (SHF-HD: P = 0.012, log-rank test; HR, 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23–0.85; OHDF: P = 0.027, log-rank test; HR, 0.41; 95% CI 0.18–0.93). The mortality of high EAL was not significantly different between high and low s-Alb in SHF-HD (3.5 ± 0.1 and 3.2 ± 0.2 g/dL) and OHDF (3.6 ± 0.2 and 3.2 ± 0.1 g/dL), despite significant differences in s-Alb. Mortality did not significantly differ between SHF-HD and OHDF with higher EAL ranges or a lower difference in EAL. Mortality in pre-OHDF was significantly correlated with EAL (P = 0.007, beta − 0.32) rather than substitution volume, and mortality in post-OHDF was not analyzed because of fewer deaths.ConclusionsThe results suggest that survival is improved more with high EAL than with low EAL in both OHDF and SHF-HD patients, that high EAL with mild-to-moderate hypoalbuminemia does not necessarily worsen survival in OHDF and SHF-HD patients, and that survival is equivalent between OHDF and SHF-HD patients with a similar level of EAL.

High-volume pre-dilution on-line hemodiafiltration is the adequate blood purification method from the viewpoint of amino acid nutrition

BackgroundWe compared amino acid leakage among high-volume pre-dilution on-line hemodiafiltration (Pre O-HDF), hemodialysis (HD), and post-dilution on-line hemodiafiltration (Post O-HDF).Subjects and methodsThe subjects were 9 patients. For HD, the total dialysate flow rate was established as 500 mL/min. For high-volume Pre O-HDF, it was established as 600 mL/min, under a replacement fluid volume of 90 L. For Post O-HDF, it was established as 600 mL/min, under a replacement fluid volume of 10 L. In both procedures, the duration of treatment was 4 h, and the blood flow volume was 200 mL/min. We compared the leakages of total amino acid, non-essential amino acid, and essential amino acid, clear spaces (CSs), β2-microglobulin (β2-MG) reduction rate, Kt/V for urea, and albumin leakage among the three procedures.ResultsAmino acid leakages after high-volume Pre O-HDF were significantly lower than HD and Post O-HDF. The CSs after high-volume Pre O-HDF were significantly lower than Post O-HDF. The β2-MG reduction rate after high-volume Pre O-HDF was significantly lower than Post O-HDF. The Kt/V for urea was not significantly different. Albumin leakages were below the detection limit (< 1 g) in the three procedures.ConclusionUnder the treatment conditions we performed this time, high-volume Pre O-HDF reduces amino acid leakage in comparison with HD and Post O-HDF. High-volume Pre O-HDF is a therapeutic mode that suppresses amino acid leakage.

Application of mathematical analysis on dialysis.

Hemodialysis is a blood purification method based on solute removal by diffusion and incorporates filtration to improve the efficiency of water removal and removal of high molecular weight substances. It is now a well-established treatment, due to the improved performance of dialyzers. This review outlines the development process of dialyzers, focusing on the application based on the mathematical analysis. First, phenomena occurring in the vicinity of the dialysis membrane are explained using a film model for diffusion and a gel polarization model for filtration. Then, currently established dialyzer designs are introduced using mathematical analysis. Furthermore, the design of dialyzers to promote internal filtration, the designs of hemodiafilters suitable for online hemodiafiltration (HDF), and the design of compact dialyzer for are also presented.

Relation Between Oxidative Stress and Carotid Artery Atherosclerosis in Hemodyalisis Patients

Abstract Oxidative stress represents a significant risk factor for the accelerated development of atherosclerosis in a population of patients on regular hemodialysis. Oxidative stress induced by hemodialysis can be triggered with both the bioincompatibility of dialysis membrane and increased endotoxin concentration in a hemodialysis solution. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between the parameters of oxidative stress, microinflammation, nutrition, secondary hyperparathyroidism and carotid artery intima-media thickness in patients on regular hemodialysis.One hundred and twenty five patients treated with standard hemodialysis and on-line hemodiafiltration with "high-flux" polysulfone dialysis membrane were examined. The following parameters of oxidative stress were measured : index of lipid peroxidation - measured as TBARS, nitric oxide in the form of nitrite - NO2-, super oxide anion radical - O2- and hydrogen peroxide - H2O2, catalase, superoxide dismutase (SOD) and reduced glutathione activity. For statistical analysis of results, the following tests were used: the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, the Spirman test and the Pearson correlation test. Oxidative stress affects atherosclerosis of the carotid arteries in patients treated with regular hemodialysis and online hemodiafiltration. There is a statistically significant positive correlation between H2O2 concentration and the thickness of the carotid arteries` intima-media. High statistically significant positive correlation was found between TBARS concentration and carotid arteries intima-media thickness, while a high statistically significant negative correlation was found between SOD activity and a carotid artery intima-media thickness. There is a statistically significant negative correlation between the serum albumin and prealbumin concentration and a carotid artery intima-media thickness. Oxidative stress may be a significant risk factor for the carotid artery atherosclerosis development in patients treated with regular hemodialysis.

Online Hemodiafiltration Compared to Conventional Hemodialysis in Critically Ill Patients

Online hemodiafiltration (HDF) has been increasingly used for improved clearance of middle molecular weight toxins. The impact of this mode of clearance is unknown in critically ill patients. We aimed to determine whether the use of HDF in acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with lower mortality and improved kidney recovery up to 90 days after initiation of therapy. Single-center retrospective cohort study using data from 2017 to 2020 of adults with AKI who initiated intermittent renal replacement therapy (IRRT) in the intensive care unit (ICU), using either hemodialysis (HD) or HDF depending on the maintenance status of the water system without regards for patient characteristics. We assessed association with patient-events and session-events using time-dependent Cox models and general estimating equations models, respectively. We included 182 adults with AKI for whom 848 IRRT sessions were performed in the ICU. The 90-day mortality rate was 43 of 182 (24.6%). There was no significant association with the use of HDF and mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.85 (0.43; 1.67) P= 0.64), kidney recovery (aHR: 1.18 (0.76; 1.84) P=0.47), or intradialytic hypotension (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.91 confidence interval [CI]: 0.64-1.28 P= 0.58). HDF treatment was associated with a lower rate of subsequent vasopressor use (aOR: 0.60 CI: 0.36-0.99 P= 0.047) and a greater reduction of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) following the first session (-15.0% vs.+5.1%, P= 0.047) but was also associated with increased risk of filter thrombosis during treatment (aOR: 2.42 CI: 1.67-3.50 P< 0.001). The use of HDF in the setting of AKI was not associated with a differential risk of mortality or kidney recovery.

Water-Soluble Vitamins and Trace Elements Losses during On-Line Hemodiafiltration.

Maintenance hemodialysis induces water-soluble vitamins and trace elements losses, which is why recommendations regarding potential supplementation were provided, but mainly based on conventional hemodialysis. This study′s aim was to measure the water–soluble vitamins and trace element losses during one on-line post-dilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) session. Thirty-nine patients under maintenance HDF were enrolled. We used the Theraflux® sampler (Theradial Corp., Orvault, France) to analyze the full session dialysate mass transfer. Blood and dialysate samples were collected before and after one HDF session to measure B1, B2, B6, B9, B12, C vitamins, zinc, and selenium concentrations. Values significantly decreased for B1 (20.2%), B2 (13%), B6 (25.4%), B9 (32.6%), C (66.6%) and selenium (6.7%). No significant differences were found for vitamin B12 and zinc. The dialysate losses per session were 1.12 ± 0.88 mg for vitamin B1, 0.28 ± 0.30 mg for B2, 0.33 ± 0.09 mg for B6, 0.3 ± 0.18 mg for B9, 147.5 ± 145.50 mg for C and 25.75 ± 6.91 mg for zinc. Vitamin B12 and selenium were under detection values. In conclusion, during a standard 4hr-HDF session, we found important losses for vitamin B1, B6, B9, C and zinc, suggesting the need for regular monitoring of plasma levels and systematic supplementation of these compounds.

Older Patients on Hemodiafiltration: Behavior of Uremic Toxins, Inflammation, Endothelium, and Bone Mineral Disorder

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects 10% of the world’s population. Uremic toxins, such as indoxyl sulfate (IS), p-Cresylsulfate (PCS) and indole acetic acid (IAA), are not sufficiently removed by conventional hemodialysis (HD) and have been associated with inflammation, poor quality of life, bone mineral disease (BMD) and endothelial injury. Online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) may promote greater clearance of uremic toxins than HD. However, there are few studies evaluating the effect of OL-HDF on serum levels of IS, PCS, IAA, and biomarkers associated with inflammatory, endothelial, and bone and mineral disorder in the elderly population. We evaluated the effect of 6 months of OL-HDF on the serum concentration of uremic toxins, biomarkers of inflammation, endothelial and bone mineral disorder in older patients on OL-HDF. IS, PCS, and IAA were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. We included 31 patients (77.4 ± 7.1 years, 64.5% male, 35.5% diabetic, on maintenance dialysis for 45 ± 20 days). From baseline to 6 months there was a decrease in serum concentration of IS but not PCS and IAA. We found no change in serum concentration of inflammatory, endothelial, or mineral and bone biomarkers. In summary, OL-HDF was capable to reduce IS in older patients. Whether this reduction may have an impact on clinical outcomes deserves further evaluation.

Modifiable Risk Factors Are Important Predictors of COVID-19-Related Mortality in Patients on Hemodialysis.

Patients with end-stage kidney disease face a higher risk of severe outcomes from SARS-CoV-2 infection. Moreover, it is not well known to what extent potentially modifiable risk factors contribute to mortality risk. In this historical cohort study, we investigated the incidence and risk factors for 30-day mortality among hemodialysis patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection treated in the European Fresenius Medical Care NephroCare network using conventional and machine learning techniques. We included adult hemodialysis patients with the first documented SARS-CoV-2 infection between February 1, 2020, and March 31, 2021, registered in the clinical database. The index date for the analysis was the first SARS-CoV-2 suspicion date. Patients were followed for up to 30 days until April 30, 2021. Demographics, comorbidities, and various modifiable risk factors, expressed as continuous parameters and as key performance indicators (KPIs), were considered to tap multiple dimensions including hemodynamic control, nutritional state, and mineral metabolism in the 6 months before the index date. We used logistic regression (LR) and XGBoost models to assess risk factors for 30-day mortality. We included 9,211 patients (age 65.4 ± 13.7 years, dialysis vintage 4.2 ± 3.7 years) eligible for the study. The 30-day mortality rate was 20.8%. In LR models, several potentially modifiable factors were associated with higher mortality: body mass index (BMI) 30-40 kg/m2 (OR: 1.28, CI: 1.10-1.50), single-pool Kt/V (OR off-target vs on-target: 1.19, CI: 1.02-1.38), overhydration (OR: 1.15, CI: 1.01-1.32), and both low (<2.5 mg/dl) and high (≥5.5 mg/dl) serum phosphate levels (OR: 1.52, CI: 1.07-2.16 and OR: 1.17, CI: 1.01-1.35). On-line hemodiafiltration was protective in the model using KPIs (OR: 0.86, CI: 0.76-0.97). SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis in XGBoost models shows a high influence on prediction for several modifiable factors as well, including inflammatory parameters, high BMI, and fluid overload. In both LR and XGBoost models, age, gender, and comorbidities were strongly associated with mortality. Both conventional and machine learning techniques showed that KPIs and modifiable risk factors in different dimensions ascertained 6 months before the COVID-19 suspicion date were associated with 30-day COVID-19-related mortality. Our results suggest that adequate dialysis and achieving KPI targets remain of major importance during the COVID-19 pandemic as well.

Dialysate sodium management in hemodialysis and online hemodiafiltration: The single-pool kinetic model revisited.

Determining the optimal dialysate sodium remains one of the challenges of hemodialysis prescription. Several arguments suggest that the dialysate sodium should be individually adjusted according to the patient's natremia. This strategy is greatly facilitated by using an algorithm. Only three such algorithms have been embedded in hemodialysis machines for the widespread generalization of this strategy in clinical routine: the Diacontrol (Hospal-Baxter Healthcare Corp., Deerfield, IL, USA), the HFR-Aequilibrium (Bellco-Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland), and the Na-control (Fresenius Medical Care, Bad-Homburg, Germany). Model the solute mass-transfer across the dialyzer membrane in online hemodiafiltration and adapt the Diacontrol algorithm based on a single-pool kinetic model of sodium balance for quantifying ionic balance and managing tonicity. (1) Substituting sodium measurements with conductivity measurements allows the control of tonicity which is a more physiological parameter than natremia. (2) Consideration of all ion exchanges as a whole and not just sodium exchange avoids some of the assumptions required by kinetic modeling of sodium balance. (3) Equations provided by the model are applicable to both hemodialysis and online hemodiafiltration. (4) The differences between this model used by Diacontrol and the models on which the other two software's (HFR-Aequilibrium and Na-control) are based are highlighted. The single-pool kinetic model developed for the management of natremia in hemodialysis is also valid for the management of tonicity for both conventional hemodialysis and all online hemodiafiltration procedures.

Sustainability and environmental impact of on-line hemodiafiltration.

Environment has become a main issue of human activities. Chronic hemodialysis (HD) therapy saves lives but consumes large amounts of water and power and produces a lot of care-related waste. On-line hemodiafiltration (HDF) improves patients' outcomes but increases water consumption from ultra-pure water needs and infusion volume. New-generation water treatment systems have much reduced the proportion of reject water that can also be reused. Reducing the dialysate flow in standard HD decreases significantly the water consumption but impacts negatively dialysis efficiency. When on-line HDF is prescribed, reducing the dialysate flow may be applied to decrease water needs while maintaining dialysis efficiency. Nowadays, dialysis prescription cannot ignore its impact on natural resources and environment.

On-line hemodiafiltration therapy for end-stage kidney disease patients: Promises for the future? What's next?

On-line hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) is currently the most advanced form of blood purification modality leading convective-based therapies in end-stage kidney disease patients. By adding a high convective component to the diffusive clearance achieved with highly permeable dialyzers, OL-HDF reinforces removal of small MWt compounds and enlarges the spectrum of uremic compounds cleared up to middle and large MWt compounds. The biological and clinical benefits of convective-based therapy are currently also being explored in a revisited hybrid modality, combining an increased internal filtration process with a more open membrane. Regular use of ultrapure dialysis fluid required by convective-based therapies improves the bio-incompatibility of the extracorporeal circuit so reducing inflammatory responses. On-line production of substitution fluid, relying on a cold sterilization by ultrafiltration, has several advantages: First, it is a safe and established process; and second, it provides an unlimited amount of substitution fluid at the same cost as regular ultrapure dialysis fluid. As such, OL-HDF is adaptable to all substitution modalities (post, pre, or mixed-HDF), thus allowing the dialytic convective dose to be adjusted to the individual patient needs. The development of OL-HDF opens new pathways such as task automation simplifying care workflow. All these features make OL-HDF the most versatile dialysis modality that can be now integrated in various treatment schedules according to session time and frequency (daily, nocturnal, or alternate day) or location (incenter, satellite, or potentially home-based therapy).