Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer Research Articles

Assessment of treatment outcomes: cytoreductive surgery compared to radiotherapy in oligometastatic prostate cancer - an in-depth quantitative evaluation and retrospective cohort analysis.

The management of oligometastatic prostate cancer, defined by its few metastatic sites, poses distinct clinical dilemmas. Debates persist regarding the most effective treatment approach, with both cytoreductive surgery and radiotherapy being key contenders. The purpose of this research is to thoroughly evaluate and compare the effectiveness of these two treatments in managing patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer. A comprehensive search of the literature was carried out to find pertinent publications that compared the results of radiation and cytoreductive surgery for oligometastatic prostate cancer. A meta-analysis was conducted in order to evaluate both short-term and long-term survival. Furthermore, utilizing institutional patient data, a retrospective cohort research was conducted to offer practical insights into the relative performances of the two treatment regimens. Five relevant studies' worth of data were included for this meta-analysis, which included 1425 patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer. The outcomes showed that, in comparison to radiation, cytoreductive surgery was linked to a substantially better cancer-specific survival (CSS) [hazard ratio (HR): 0.70, 95% (CI): 0.59-0.81, P <0.001] and overall survival (OS) [HR, 0.80; 95% (CI), 0.77-0.82; P <0.01]. The two therapy groups' Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer-Free Survival (CRPCFS), however, did not differ significantly (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.17-1.06; HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.26-1.02, respectively). Out of the 102 patients who were recruited in the retrospective cohort research, 36 had cytoreductive surgery (CRP), 36 had radiation therapy (primary lesion), and 30 had radiation therapy (metastatic lesion). The follow-up time was 46.3 months (18.6-60.0) on average. The enhanced OS in the CRP group [OS interquartile range (IQR): 45-60 months] in comparison to the radiation group (OS IQR: 39.0-59.0 months and 25.8-55.0 months, respectively) was further supported by the cohort research. Furthermore, CRP had a better OS than both radiation (primary region) and radiotherapy (metastatic region), with the latter two therapeutic methods having similar OS. This meta-analysis and retrospective research provide valuable insights into the comparative efficacy of cytoreductive surgery and radiotherapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer. While short-term survival (PFS, CRPCFS) was similar between the two groups, cytoreductive surgery exhibited superior CSS and OS. Adverse event rates were manageable in both modalities. These findings contribute to informed treatment decision-making for clinicians managing oligometastatic prostate cancer patients. Further prospective studies and randomized controlled trials are essential to corroborate these results and guide personalized therapeutic approaches for this distinct subset of patients.

Metastases-directed radiotherapy in castration resistant oligo metastatic prostate cancer: A multicentric retrospective study from the French group COLib

Oligometastases aredefined as a number of detectable metastases less or equal to 5. In castrate-resistant oligo metastatic prostate Cancer (CR oligoM PC), Metastases-Directed Ablative radiotherapy (MDRT) is poorly investigated. Our study retrospectively reviewed the cases of CR oligoM PC treated with MDRT in 8 French high-volume radiotherapy centers.OS and PFS are defined as the delay between the first day of MDRT and death (OS) or progression according to PCWG criteria (PFS). OS and PFS are evaluated according to Kaplan Meyer, curves are compared with log rank test. Logistic regression was used to identify predictive factors for outcome: bone versus node metastasis, ISUP grade, PSA doubling Time (PSADT) at the time of MDRT, time to castration resistance.107 patients were included in the study, among those 197 metastases received MDRT. For the overall population, the median follow-up was 25.2 months (1,4–145). OS was 93 % at 2 years and 81,4% at 3 years. At 2 years, 100 % of patients with node-only metastasis were alive versus 88,7% among those who have bone metastases (p = 0,72). The median PFS was 12,6 months (IC 95 % [9,6; 17]), with no difference among patients with node only disease versus the rest of the cohort.The PFS was 18,2 months (10,0; 32,4) in patients with PSADT >6 months versus 10,7 months (8,9; 14,3) when PSADT was inferior to 6 months. However, this difference did not reach significant.We did not find a correlation neither between ISUP grade (1–2 versus 3–4-5) and PFS, nor between hormone-sensitivity duration and PFS.Patients receiving MDRT for CR oligoM PC have a good prognosis with 81,6% OS at 3 years. PSA DT longer than 6 months could be related to better PFS. MDRT strategy could postpone the onset of new systemic treatment with median PFS >1 year.

Radical prostatectomy versus radiotherapy as local therapy for primary tumors in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer.

We compared radical prostatectomy (RP) and radiotherapy (RT) as local therapies for primary tumors and examined their associations with survival outcomes and urinary tract complications in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer (omPC). We evaluated the data of 85 patients diagnosed with omPC who underwent local therapy for primary tumors between January 2008 and December 2018. Of the 85 patients, 31 underwent prostate RT, while 54 underwent RP. Oligometastatic disease was defined as the presence of fewer than five metastatic lesions without visceral metastasis. Urinary tract complications, progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analyses. Patients treated with RT showed higher prostate-specific antigen levels. There was no significant difference in the 5-year PFS (52.5% vs. 37.9%, p=0.351), CSS (67.6% vs. 84.7%, p=0.473), or OS (63.6% vs. 73.8%, p=0.897) between the RT and RP groups. In the multivariate analyses, the type of local therapy was not associated with PFS (hazard ratio [HR]=1.334, p=0.356), CSS (HR=0.744, p=0.475), or OS (HR=0.953, p=0.897). Therefore, RP seems to be a possible treatment option for patients with omPC, exhibiting oncologic outcomes comparable to those with RT.

Efficacy and safety of combination neoadjuvant chemo-hormonal therapy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for oligometastatic prostate cancer.

Efficacy and safety of combination neoadjuvant chemo-hormonal therapy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for oligometastatic prostate cancer.

Metastasis-directed therapy in prostate cancer

Metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) in oligometastatic prostate cancer (omHSPC) is playing an increasingly important role in therapy with the aim of delaying disease progression, the start of systemic treatment or switching systemic treatment to improve the patient's overall prognosis. Molecular imaging as prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) imaging allows metastases to be detected with ahigher sensitivity and specificity. This means that they can be detected early and made accessible for treatment. The standard therapy for oligo-mHSPC is androgen deprivation (ADT), which is supplemented by novel hormonal therapeutics (NHT). Afew small prospective trials have shown an extension of the ADT-free interval and progression-free survival (PFS), particularly in metachronous oligo-mHSPC, by MDT, usually radiotherapy. Additional ADT can further extend the PFS in particular. There are hardly any prospective data for synchronous oligo-mHSPC. Despite the currently still poor evidence, MDT is playing an increasingly important role. The still unclear definition of oligometastasis and the large number of influencing factors make it difficult to compare current data. Large multicenter prospective data are still pending. It is also important to clarify the effect of limited ADT in combination with NHT in the treatment of synchronous and metachronous oligo-mHSPC with MDT. In synchronous oligo-mHSPC in particular, further benefit of additional local therapy of the primary in combination with MDT should also be investigated.

Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy in metastatic prostate cancer.

The evolving role of stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) as metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) for oligometastatic prostate cancer (omPCa) will be discussed. Oligometastatic disease (OMD) is an intermediate state between localized and wide-spread malignant disease. OMD has recently been spotlighted given the increasing demonstration of clinical benefit from local therapies despite presence of metastatic disease and allure of the curative potential of MDT in select cases. Among the different forms of MDT, SABR has rapidly become a widely adopted treatment modality. Significant efforts in this space have focused on omPCa, owing to its relatively indolent biology, presence of a sensitive and specific serum biomarker and recent advances in molecular imaging. While most studies have evaluated the role of SABR MDT in hormone sensitive omPCa, new emerging clinical data also suggests benefits of SABR MDT for even castration-resistant disease. Treating omPCa with SABR MDT appears to generate an efficacy signal with minimal morbidity across both hormone-sensitive and castration-resistant disease. However, additional definitive omPCa trial data are needed. Future research efforts should investigate biomarkers for this heterogeneous disease space and the role of SABR MDT in combination with systemic agents to improve upon standard of care treatments.

Local therapies for oligometastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer

Oligometastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (omHSPC) is increasingly diagnosed due to the implementation of molecular imaging. OmHSPC is mostly defined as amaximum of four bone metastases without visceral metastases on conventional imaging. This study highlights the existing evidence regarding local treatment of omHSPC, taking into account molecular imaging and modern therapies. Narrative review article based on expert consensus and national/international guideline recommendations, supported by anonsystematic literature search in PubMed (MEDLINE). The authors consider the cited studies as the most significant works in this regard and these were selected to illustrate developments and fundamental concepts, without claiming completeness. Initially, the STAMPEDE study prospectively demonstrated an oncologic benefit of radiotherapy (RT) to the prostate in addition to androgen deprivation therapy for omHSPC. At 3years, overall survival (OS) was 81% with RT versus 73% without RT (hazard ratio [HR] 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.90; p = 0.007). However, this benefit was not observed in polymetastatic HSPC (HR 1.07; 95% CI 0.90-1.28; p = 0.4). In astudy by Dai etal., local therapy for omHSPC was performed surgically in 85% of cases, also demonstrating an OS advantage (HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.24-0.81; p = 0.008). OmHSPC should be treated using adjunctive RT. Preliminary prospective evidence shows comparable efficacy with prostatectomy. Modern systemic combination therapies challenge the role of local therapy.

Systemic and tumor-directed therapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer (SOLAR): A phase II trial for veterans with de novo oligometastatic prostate cancer.

163 Background: Treatment paradigms for oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer patients are evolving. Molecular imaging improves staging, intensified systemic and primary tumor directed therapy improves survival, metastasis-directed therapy improves local control. The impact of combining these imaging and therapeutic approaches into a planned multimodal treatment strategy is unknown. Here we report a prospective phase II single-arm trial combining local, metastasis-directed, and intensified systemic therapies of limited duration with the objective to durably render Veterans free of progression off therapy. Methods: Veterans with de novo M1a/b prostate cancer and 1-5 radiographically visible M1 lesions underwent radical local treatment, intensified systemic therapy for six months (leuprolide, abiraterone acetate with prednisone, apalutamide), and metastasis-directed stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SBRT). Radical local therapy was either radical prostatectomy (n=12) with lymph node dissection and post-operative radiotherapy (pT≥3a, N1, or positive margins) or radical radiotherapy (n=12) directed to the prostate, SVs, and pelvic LNs. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients achieving an undetectable serum PSA (for radical prostatectomy) or &lt;2 ng/mL (for radical radiotherapy) six months after recovery of testosterone to ≥150 ng/dL. Secondary endpoints included time to biochemical progression, time to radiographic progression, time to initiation of alternative antineoplastic therapy, prostate cancer specific survival, health related quality-of-life, safety and tolerability. Results: Twenty-eight patients enrolled and 4 dropped out (3 prior to start of treatment). All were staged by PSMA PET/CT except two (one by Fluciclovine PET/CT, and one by NaF PET/CT, CT, MRI). Twenty-nine percent were M1a, seventy-one percent were M1b. Median follow-up was 30 months (range 20 - 61 months). Mean and median number of M1 metastases were both two. Sixty-two percent completed all planned systemic therapy without dose modification. One did not recover testosterone after 29 months. Twenty-two had &gt;6 months follow-up after testosterone recovery, 19 of 22 (86%) remain free of any progression (primary endpoint). Three had metastatic progression, one poly nodal M1a progression, one multiple bone metastases, one multiple bone and nodal metastases. Grade 2 and 3 toxicities for primary tumor therapy were 46% and 4%; SBRT 0% and 0%; systemic therapy 42% and 4%. There was one Grade 4 toxicity. Conclusions: Although a small trial, a majority of patients with molecular imaging defined de novo oligometastatic prostate cancer treated with primary and metastasis-directed therapy with intensified systemic therapy of limited duration remained free of progression with a recovered testosterone off all active therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03298087 .

Protocol for Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Radiotherapy for Prostate and Oligometastatic Lesions in Patients With Low-Burden Sensitive Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: An Open, Exploratory Pilot Clinical Trial.

The existing large prospective study demonstrates the benefits of primary radiotherapy in patients with low-volume oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC), and there is additional evidence of the benefits of local metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) for metastatic lesions. However, there are no results from a prospective study to demonstrate the efficacy of radiotherapy for prostate and oligometastases. Therefore, the aim of the protocol is to illustrate the efficacy of radiotherapy for prostate and oligometastatic lesions in patients with low-volume de novo hormone-sensitive OMPC. This study involves a prospective, single-center, limited-sample, single-arm exploration of radiotherapy for prostate and oligometastatic lesions in patients diagnosed with low-volume hormone-sensitive OMPC. Eligible participants undergo thorough assessments and treatment involving endocrine therapy alongside radiation targeting metastatic lesions and the pelvic region. The primary site is treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), while metastatic sites are treated with either VMAT or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) depending on their location. All patients received radiation therapy for both the primary and metastatic lesions combined with endocrine therapy. Endocrine therapy with an antiandrogen (bicalutamide, for 4 weeks) androgen deprivation therapy combined with novel hormonal agents (acetate abiraterone) will be continued for 2 years. The primary objective is to evaluate progression-free survival-2 (PFS-2), while secondary endpoints include androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)-free survival, quality of life (QoL), overall survival, time to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), radiation-related complications, and endocrine therapy-related adverse events. Approval was obtained from the ethics committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University (CHEC2023-220). This is a single-arm exploration pilot trial evaluating radiotherapy for prostate and oligometastatic lesions in patients with OMPC. It aims to disseminate its findings through peer-reviewed journals and relevant medical conferences, with the intention of publication and presentation at these events. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT06198387.

Prognostic value of PSMA-extracellular vesicles in oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy: A multi-center observational study.

191 Background: Two randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that SABR can prolong time to progression in oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (omCSPC) patients. However, there is a need for predictive tools to identify patients who will benefit from SABR alone or with systemic therapy. We investigated the prognostic value of PSMA-positive extracellular vesicles (PSMA+EVs) in a blinded observational study using blood samples from three independent patient cohorts. Methods: We obtained plasma samples from 157 omCSPC patients treated with SABR from the ORIOLE cohort (N=30, JHU) and STOMP-like cohorts (N=80, UGhent; N=47, Iridium Net). Baseline PSMA+EV levels (EV/ml) were measured by nanoscale flow cytometry. Primary clinical endpoints were biochemical progression (bPFS) and radiographic progression (rPFS). Optimal cutoffs for PSA (ng/ml) and PSMA+EV (EVs/ml) were defined as the point with the most significant log-rank test split. Kaplan-Meier curves and univariate Cox regression models were used to determine the association of PSMA+EV levels with clinical outcomes. Results: Twenty percent of patients (N=157 total) were diagnosed with bone scan, 79% with PET imaging, and 1% with other modalities. Ninety-four percent of patients presented with ≤3 metastases on imaging. In the pooled STOMP-like cohorts, median bPFS was 27.9 and 18.0 months for PSMA+EV low and high groups, respectively (p=0.039). Median rPFS was 36.0 versus 27.0 months (p=0.029). In the ORIOLE cohort, median bPFS was 24.3 and 5.9 months in PSMA+EV low and high, respectively (p=0.021). Median rPFS was 36.0 versus 11.1 months (p=0.019). High baseline PSMA+EV levels were associated with higher risk of both biochemical and radiographic progression (Table). Combination of baseline PSA low and PSMA+EV low outperformed either biomarker alone and better predicted risk of disease progression after SABR. Conclusions: While prospective biomarker-guided trials are warranted, a PSMA+EV blood test can aid patient selection by identifying omCSPC patients who may have durable responses to SABR without ADT. [Table: see text]

Dissecting tumor-immune dynamics and radiotherapy response in oligometastatic prostate cancer.

213 Background: Radiation therapy (RT) can improve survival in oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC) patients (pts). Reports implicate immune system contribution to both local tumor control and systemic regression of metastases. Understanding molecular and immune drivers of clinical responses in irradiated OMPC pts may elucidate mechanisms of RT-driven antitumor immune activity. Methods: Prospective samples from consented pts with OMPC (de novo/oligorecurrent) receiving RT included baseline (pre-RT) and 3 post-RT blood samples (RT end, 3-, 6-months). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PMBC) were obtained at each timepoint. PBMC sample barcoding and antibody labeling was performed prior to analysis by mass cytometry by time of flight (CyTOF). Data were debarcoded/analyzed using standard deconvolution/gating/clustering algorithms. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests identified longitudinal differences in comparison to baseline. P &lt;0.05 denotes significance. Results: Between 2020-2022, 14 OMPC pts (56 samples) met inclusion criteria (2 de novo, 12 oligorecurrent). All received androgen deprivation therapy. De novo OMPC pts received simultaneous RT to the prostate, pelvis, and OM lesions. 6/12 oligorecurrent pts received simultaneous RT to a pelvic field along with OM lesions, while the remainder received RT to the OM lesions alone. Median follow-up was 17 months (r, 3-29). Four pts (28.6%) experienced recurrence (defined by PSA progression). Median time to recurrence after RT was 10.5 months. Significant differences in immune cell subsets after RT compared to pre-RT levels were identified by CyTOF analysis. CD4+ naïve cells peaked 6 months post-RT, while CD4+ effector memory (EM) cells peaked immediately post-RT (p=0.0012) and decreased to baseline levels at 3 months. CD4+ effector cells expressing TIGIT, OX40, ICOS, and CD69 were significantly more abundant immediately post-RT (p&lt;0.05) compared to baseline. CD8+ cells expressing ICOS increased post-RT and were significantly increased at 6 months (p=0.03). In marked contrast to recurrent pts, non-recurrent pts exhibited increasing CD4+ T regulatory cells that peaked 6 months post-RT (p=0.04) and CD4+ EM cells that peaked post-RT (p=0.02). CD4+ effector cells expressing ICOS (p=0.01) and PD-1 (p=0.01) were both increased immediately post-RT, while cells expressing 4-1BB continued to increase and peaked 6 months post-RT (p=0.04). These changes were not observed or not significant in the recurrent population. Conclusions: Longitudinal immune cell subset changes can be observed after RT for OMPC. These data support immune activation, particularly immediately post-RT in non-recurrent pts, with some longitudinal changes lasting up to 6 months. Further analyses include TCR sequencing, inclusion of serum proteomics, and baseline genomic markers that may predict immune system activation and clinical outcomes.

ARTO trial: Overall survival analysis from a randomized phase II trial testing the benefit of adding stereotactic body radiotherapy to abiraterone acetate in patients with oligometastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer.

ARTO trial: Overall survival analysis from a randomized phase II trial testing the benefit of adding stereotactic body radiotherapy to abiraterone acetate in patients with oligometastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer.

A phase 2 single-arm study testing SBRT, adenosine signaling modulation, and immune checkpoint inhibition for men with hormone-sensitive oligometastatic prostate cancer (SBRT-AMICO).

A phase 2 single-arm study testing SBRT, adenosine signaling modulation, and immune checkpoint inhibition for men with hormone-sensitive oligometastatic prostate cancer (SBRT-AMICO).

Mature results of a phase 2 pilot study of radium-223 and radiotherapy in untreated hormone-naïve men with oligometastatic prostate cancer to bone.

160 Background: We hypothesized that treatment with Radium-223 (Ra223) and to ≤5 sites of bony metastases could safely delay the time to start androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and maintain quality of life (QoL). Methods: 20 men previously treated with surgery, radiation, or both for M0 PCa later developed ≤5 bone-only mets were eligible for this prospective trial. Inclusion: testosterone ≥ 100 ng/dL and mets on conventional bone scan, validated by a CT, MRI, or PET/CT. Exclusion: LHRH therapies after initial treatment or N1 disease at diagnosis of bone mets. Therapy was 6 cycles of Ra223 and SBRT (30 Gy in 5 fractions between cycles 1-2). Bone scan was performed at baseline and q3 months. PSA was evaluated monthly during the Ra223 course and q3 months after. Therapeutic effectiveness was defined as ≥20% of patients meeting the primary endpoint of freedom from ADT (FFAdt) use at 15 months. Discontinuation of study therapy occurred if: PSA rise &gt; 10% if baseline PSA &gt;20ng/ml, PSA&gt;20 if baseline PSA &lt;20 ng/ml, radiographic progression or a skeletal-related event (SRE). All endpoints were timed from the Cycle 1 radium date. Patients were followed for 2 years. Clinically significant changes in patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures were defined as &gt;1/2 standard deviation from the mean baseline value and were censored after the time of ADT use. Continuous and categorical covariates were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum and Pearson’s Chi2 tests and univariate Cox regression. Statistical significance was considered at P&lt;0.05. Results: The median number of Ra223 cycles was 6. 6 patients had &lt;6 cycles (range 2-5) due to progression. FFAdt at 15 and 24 months was 50.0% and 40.0%, respectively (p&lt;0.001). Median time to ADT was 15 months. 11 (55%) and 5 (25%) patients had a PSA decline exceeding 50% and 90%, respectively. Two patients had undetectable (PSA&lt;0.01) at 2 years. There were no significant changes from baseline in any PRO QoL domain (physical functioning, anxiety, depression, fatigue, satisfaction with participation in social roles, sleep disturbance, and pain interference). There were 2 patients with Grade 3 SREs (bone fracture, pain). Grade 2+ events attributed as possible or likely to Ra-223 were seen in 4 patients (bone pain, fatigue, fracture, decreased WBC count, and other). Grade 2+ events attributed as possible or likely to EBRT were seen in 2 patients, including fatigue and other pain. No differences were noted for age, baseline PSA, days from primary treatment, NCCN risk group, TNM stage, ISUP grade group, BMI, or # of lesions in those who met or failed the primary endpoint (all p&gt;0.05). Conclusions: In this prospective pilot study, the first-line use of Ra223 and SBRT to conventionally imaged oligomets in hormone-naïve men resulted in a significant delay in ADT use compared to historical control. The therapy is well tolerated, maintains QoL, and may result in undetectable PSA. Clinical trial information: NCT03304418 .

Progress in Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: Emerging Imaging Innovations and Therapeutic Approaches

Prostate cancer (PCa) exhibits a spectrum of heterogeneity, from indolent to highly aggressive forms, with approximately 10–20% of patients experiencing metastatic PCa. Oligometastatic PCa, characterized by a limited number of metastatic lesions in specific anatomical locations, has gained attention due to advanced imaging modalities. Although patients with metastatic PCa typically receive systemic therapy, personalized treatment approaches for oligometastatic PCa are emerging, including surgical and radiotherapeutic interventions. This comprehensive review explores the latest developments in the field of oligometastatic PCa, including its biological mechanisms, advanced imaging techniques, and relevant clinical studies. Oligometastatic PCa is distinct from widespread metastases and presents challenges in patient classification. Imaging plays a crucial role in identifying and characterizing oligometastatic lesions, with new techniques such as prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography demonstrating a remarkable efficacy. The management strategies encompass cytoreductive surgery, radiotherapy targeting the primary tumor, and metastasis-directed therapy for recurrent lesions. Ongoing clinical trials are evaluating the effectiveness of these approaches. Oligometastatic PCa occupies a unique position between locally advanced and high-volume metastatic diseases. While a universally accepted definition and standardized diagnostic criteria are still evolving, emerging imaging technologies and therapeutic strategies hold promise for improving the patient outcomes in this intermediate stage of PCa.

High-risk and Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: Current Treatment Paradigms

Summary Over the past decade or so with the treatment of high risk and oligometastatic disease has undergone a paradigm shift. Improvements in surgical techniques especially the robot assisted surgeries and better radiation techniques have ensured a good quality of life with maintained oncological outcomes. Further to it development and better understanding the disease biology have ensured good outcomes even in high grade cancers. This comprehensive overview delves into the management of high-risk prostate cancer and oligometastatic prostate cancer, addressing their definitions, diagnostic workup, and treatment modalities. Essentially managing high-risk and oligometastatic prostate cancer requires a multidisciplinary approach, integrating surgery, radiation, and systemic therapies.

Cytoreductive surgery in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer

Cytoreductive surgery in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer

Health-related quality of life in men with oligometastatic prostate cancer following metastases-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy: Real-world data from the E2-RADIatE OligoCare cohort

ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of metastases-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in men with oligometastatic prostate cancer (PCa) using real-world data from the OligoCare cohort. Materials and methodsOligoCare is a pragmatic, observational cohort designed to assess the impact of metastases-directed SBRT on patients with oligometastatic disease (OMD). We report an interim analyses of the secondary endpoint HRQoL, assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30, within six months of metastases-directed SBRT for oligometastatic disease in men with PCa among the first 1600 registered patients. HRQoL data collection was optional within the OligoCare cohort. To compare HRQoL between baseline and first follow-up assessment, a Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used. A multiple linear regression model was used to explore the HRQoL associations with predefined factors. ResultsOut of the 1600 registered patients, 658 were treated for oligometastatic PCa, of which 233 had baseline QoL data and 132 patients had both baseline and follow-up HRQoL data. At baseline, most patients had a WHO performance status of 0 or 1 (87 %), were de-novo oligometastatic (79 %), had one metastasis (90 %), and had a good overall global health status (mean 80.81, SD16.11, IQR 75–92). 51 % received hormonal therapy as concomitant systemic treatment. Patients with comorbidities as assessed by the Charlson Comorbidity index had a worse global health status at baseline (-4.88, 95 % CI:-9.35, −0.42). No clinically meaningful significant difference in global health status was observed at first assessment following SBRT (median 3.0 months) compared with baseline (mean difference 2.27, 95 % CI:-1.54, 6.08). Upon evaluating the proportions, meaningful clinically important differences (a 10-point or more difference) was observed in, 17 % and 11 % of the patients reporting deterioration and improvement of global health status, respectively. ConclusionMetastases-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy had no negative impact on global HRQoL within the first six months after treatment.

Metastasis-directed therapy: new standard or too early to change paradigm?

SummaryMetastasis-directed therapy (MDT) is an emerging treatment strategy for patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer (PCa), particularly for oligorecurrent disease. This review aims to summarize findings from several prospective trials in the setting of oligorecurrent PCa. We found that MDT is feasible, has high tolerability, and is effective in terms of local control of treated lesions and of deferring disease progression in well-selected patients. Selecting patients for MDT requires thoughtful consideration of factors such as the castration status, the number of detected metastases, and the imaging modality used for metastasis detection. Notably, the studies included in this review varied in terms of these factors, complicating the comparability of their results. Despite the existence of several prospective clinical trials in the field, there is an absence of high-level evidence attributable to the lack of phase 3 clinical trials. As a result, current guidelines recommend the administration of MDT exclusively within the context of clinical trials. Despite this, retrospective series indicate that MDT is already frequently utilized outside of clinical trials.

Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer—The Middle Child Syndrome

Oligometastatic prostate cancer is an evolving clinical entity as more data from novel imaging tools such as PSMA PET/CT emerges. Recognition of this disease entity allows for unique interventions which differ from conventional treatment of metastatic prostate cancers such as the initiation of chemotherapy. With metastasis-directed therapy (MDT), there is potential for early eradication of limited disease metastases and a delay in systemic treatment with its associated treatment-related toxicities. This review explores the current evidence and outcomes of different metastasis-directed therapies such as the role of radiotherapy in low volume metastasis and the use of PSMA ligands to facilitate pelvic lymph node dissections. With a deeper understanding of this low metastasis state, it has revolutionized the current viable treatment options, and more studies are ongoing to provide further insights into this unique disease entity.