Several different prognostic systems are currently in use worldwide to predict the outcome of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Some of them have been widely publicized [1,2] while others have not been acknowledged by a wider audience so far [3]. All of the systems currently in use, except for the TNM-system, have taken care of the fact that prognosis in patients with HCC is decided not only by the tumor burden but, to a very significant part, also by the degree of the underlying liver cirrhosis. The oldest of the prognostic systems still in use today, the Okuda system, has simply taken three parameters of the Child-Pugh Score and supplemented it with a very crude estimation of the tumor size on imaging, thereby deriving a very simple but also for many patients today inaccurate three-stage prognostic system [4]. In particular, Okuda staging is mostly helpful for estimating the prognosis of the early as well as the most advanced stages of disease, while leaving the majority of patients in the intermediate Okuda stage II with a very rough estimate of the survival, which made it a system of very low practical value for the management of patients with HCC. In their recently published manuscript, Huitzil-Melendez and colleagues retrospectively compare the predictive power of seven different prognostic systems with regards to the outcome of patients with advanced stage HCC, destined to undergo medical therapy for their disease [5]. Their conclusion after evaluating TNM sixth edition, Okuda, BCLC, CLIP, CUPI, JIS, and GETCH in 187 eligible patients is that CLIP, CUPI, and GETCH were the most informative systems, while BCLC and TNM lacked discriminatory power in their patients. Looking at individual parameters, the addition of performance status, AST, abdominal pain, and esophageal varices to CLIP would be able to improve its prognostic accuracy even further. The general idea of the authors was to find
Read full abstract