It is common to upgrade chemical enhanced oil recovery (CEOR) method by using two or more additives to simultaneously benefit from their mechanisms in EOR process. Chemical water engineering in combinational methods should be such that additives do not neutralize each other's effects and do not change EOR mechanisms. Dissolved carbon dioxide is considered as an additive in carbonated water injection process. Oil swelling is the most important mechanism of carbonated water injection. Besides, wettability of reservoir rock, especially carbonate rock, in this method shifts to hydrophilicity. Injection of carbonated water and injection of surfactant solution are two important methods of EOR. When dissolved carbon dioxide is used as an additive, in addition to EOR, a large amount of carbon dioxide is stored in underground reservoir. In other words, carbonated water injection method follows a process with economic and environmental goals. However, its effect on water and crude oil interfacial tension (IFT) is not significant. In this study, the technique of combining additives was investigated to solve this challenge, i.e. to strengthen the mechanism of reducing interfacial tension. An anionic surfactant synthesized from Rapeseed oil at lower concentrations than critical micelle concentration (CMC), CMC and above CMC in combination with enriched chemical water by dissolved carbon dioxide was used. The experiments of IFT, oil swelling and contact angle were performed for this purpose. Pressure, temperature and salinity effects as parameters affecting carbonated water performance were studied in the experiments. According to the findings, the combination of using the surfactant with carbonated water significantly reduces the IFT even at higher concentrations than CMC. At 80 °C and 2000 psi, the IFT of carbonated fluids at the surfactant concentrations of 0, 3500, 4500, and 5500 ppm were 10.927, 4.948, 3.596, and 1.503 mN/m, respectively. The contact angle increases at a lower concentration than CMC, decreases sharply at CMC and the intensity of the decreasing trend decreases at a higher concentration than CMC but it remains less than the contact angle at CMC. At 80 °C and 2000 psi, the contact angle values at the surfactant concentrations of 0, 3500, 4500 and 5500 ppm were 71.41°, 80.52°, 60.44° and 55.18°, respectively. Crude oil swelling rises at a lower concentration than CMC and CMC but decreases at a higher concentration than CMC as it has the highest value at CMC. At 80 °C and 2000 psi, increased oil swelling values at the surfactant concentrations of 0, 3500, 4500 and 5500 ppm were 10.10%, 15.41%, 15.62% and 14.52%, respectively.