Administrators at the University of Tsukuba have read the letter from 11 physicists who criticized the university’s disciplinary action against Teruji Cho (Physics Today, December 2008, page 10). We are concerned that the writers did so without a full grasp of the incident and the procedure followed by the university. The university’s website has posted the official investigation report in Japanese (http://www.tsukuba.ac.jp/public/press/080306press_4.pdf) and an abridged English translation (http://www.tsukuba.ac.jp/english/public/pressrelease/p_report/report_d.pdf).The University of Tsukuba has an established system of handling incidents of research-related misconduct under its Scientific Ethics and Research Conduct Committee. SERCC sets up an investigation committee that examines the details of the case and reports its findings to SERCC. If SERCC concludes that misconduct was perpetrated, the disciplinary committee of the university’s Education and Research Council determines the disciplinary measures.For the incident involving Cho and three assistant professors, the procedure was strictly followed. The investigation committee, whose members are listed in the online documents, included three distinguished plasma physicists from outside the university.After a year of investigation between April 2007 and March 2008, SERCC concluded that Cho and his three coworkers falsified raw data to make two figures for their paper published in Physical Review Letters (PRL) 1 1. T. Cho et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 055001 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.055001 and that the falsification constitutes scientific misconduct. SERCC based its conclusions on an in-depth examination of documentary evidence, including emails and intermediate analyses, that it acquired from the students who filed the misconduct complaint and from Cho and coworkers. SERCC reported its conclusions to the president of the university on 4 March 2008 and advised that the authors retract the paper. The president acted on those conclusions and advice. Subsequently, the disciplinary committee determined that Cho should be dismissed from the faculty, and that action was carried out on 27 August 2008. The committee also decided that the three assistant professors be suspended from their positions for one to four months; that was put into effect on 16 October 2008.During the investigation, the university, through SERCC and the investigation committee, took every measure to guarantee that Cho and the three coworkers had opportunities to present their views and rebuttals in written form. Those rebuttals, however, failed to convince SERCC to reverse its conclusions.In the incident, the falsification occurred during the process of making two figures from raw data. Since access to the raw data was confined to Cho’s group, uncovering such a falsification would have been extremely difficult if students from the group had not raised the issue. Besides Cho and the suspended professors, 11 University of Tsukuba faculty members are listed as coauthors of the PRL paper. They are experts on the GAMMA-10 tandem mirror and longtime collaborators with Cho. However, even they could not detect the falsification. After the investigation, 23 coauthors, including 1 of the 3 suspended assistant professors, have asked the PRL editorial office to withdraw their names from the paper.The incident has been deeply troubling for the university, since the mirror fusion research led by Cho had been an important component of our scientific activities for many years. We therefore made every effort to follow the due process of investigation and make sure our decisions were based on fact. The findings left us no choice but to take the action against Cho and three coworkers. The university’s investigation was open, and the results have been made public. We invite our colleagues in the international academic community to read the reports so they can understand the reasons for our action.REFERENCESection:ChooseTop of pageREFERENCE <<1. T. Cho et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 055001 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.055001 , Google ScholarCrossref, ISI© 2009 American Institute of Physics.