HE United States Board on Geographic Names is a competent and well-equipped organization and is able to command the services of high authorities on the regions with which it deals. Consequently, although one may disagree with certain fundamental principles employed, and object to certain of the decisions, in a recent publication of the Board on the geographical names of Antarctica, nobody examining the work closely will deny that the careful sorting and sifting reflected here and the full and reliable notes accompanying each main entry have made this a volume of scholarly comment which no student of can afford to neglect. history of nearly every name listed as a main entry has been traced and recorded. Many difficulties of identification, localization, and repetition have been resolved. Numerous original names have been restored to their proper places. And, in spite of American policy toward sovereignty in the Antarctic, the research has been done with a fair-mindedness and impartiality that are rare in the international relations of our times. For this reason alone it would be a pleasure to be able to recommend the Board's work on Antarctic names to the English-speaking world without reserve. But our friends would, I believe, prefer honest criticism to the concealment of an unfavorable opinon of their underlying principles. The Geographical Names of Antarctica contains I7 pages of introductory matter, a list of expeditions (92 pages), a bibliography (i6 pages), and a list of geographical names (127 pages, listing about I400 entries). introduction explains an elaborate scheme for the giving, checking, revision, and reduction to regular form of geographical names in the Antarctic. bibliography represents the impressive documentary background to the work, and the list of names is the result. form of reference to the reports of expeditions in the bibliography is in some respects faulty; and there is no reference to the International Polar Commission, which had an office in Brussels before the war of I914-1918. This commission published a bibliography by Jean Denuce that was considered at the time to be the best and most comprehensive available.I regional limit set to the Antarctic by the Board on Geographic Names is nowhere clearly explained, but the name (not itself listed) seems always to mean the supposedly continuous mass of land around the South Pole. There are, nevertheless, numerous marine names in the list. As Gribb Bank and Coronation Island are admitted but Banzare Rise and Thule (Morrell Island) are excluded, the limit seems to be 60? S., to the somewhat arbitrary exclusion of Scotia Sea and Drake Passage and inclusion of the South Sandwich Islands, though of no individual island in the group. This limitation seems to account for