You have accessJournal of UrologyUrodynamics/Incontinence/Female Urology: Incontinence - Evaluation & Therapy II1 Apr 20121186 FINAL OFFICE EVALUATION FINDINGS IN E-SISTER PARTICIPANTS AT ONE CENTER: A GLIMPSE INTO THE LONG-TERM RESULTS OF STRESS INCONTINENCE SURGERY Philippe Zimmern, Hong Zhao, Tamara Dickinson, Xian-Jin Xie, and Gary Lemack Philippe ZimmernPhilippe Zimmern Dallas, TX More articles by this author , Hong ZhaoHong Zhao Dallas, TX More articles by this author , Tamara DickinsonTamara Dickinson Dallas, TX More articles by this author , Xian-Jin XieXian-Jin Xie Dallas, TX More articles by this author , and Gary LemackGary Lemack Dallas, TX More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.1431AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Because of attrition rate in long-term surgical incontinence studies, most available data are derived from phone interviews or postal questionnaires. We report on an ancillary study of E-SISTER participants at one center who returned for long-term office evaluation. METHODS Following IRB and UITN approval, participants in E-SISTER at one center were invited to return for an extensive final office evaluation, including validated questionnaires, physical examination (with POP-Q), cough stress test, and a non-invasive flow rate. The intent of this visit was to explore the rate of recurrent urethral hypermobility, secondary prolapse, voiding changes over time, patient satisfaction. All visits were conducted by an expert examiner unaware of patient original surgical assignment. A mixed model analysis was used to compare baseline, 2 year (end of SISTER trial), and last visit/evaluation datasets between the 2 groups. RESULTS Of 31 patients, 27 returned for a final assessment, including 12 Burch (B) and 15 Fascia sling (S). Median follow-up was 7.2 years. Using strict 5 SISTER criteria, success rate was 25% for Burch and 40% for Sling (p=0.68). Over 85 % of patients had a negative stress test. Reduction in incontinence episodes was high compared to baseline (p=0.009). Point Aa, a surrogate marker for bladder neck and proximal urethral support, improved in both groups after surgery, but did not change over time for the B group while it kept improving for S, possibly from retraction and scarring effect. No significant changes were observed for all other POPQ points over time. Mean PdetQmax was unchanged in the B group but significantly higher in the S group at 2 years (baseline18,5 cm H2O versus 32,1 cm H2O). Mean maximum flow rate dropped considerably in the S group over time (baseline 29, to 16.7 ml/sec at last visit), but remained unchanged in the Burch group. PVR remained low in both groups. 100% recommended the surgery to a friend or would have the surgery done again. QoL scores went down significantly at 2 years and trended upward at last evaluation, although much lower than at baseline. CONCLUSIONS We found stable urethral support, no secondary prolapses, concerning changes in flow parameters in the sling group over time, and a high level of satisfaction despite a notable failure rate based on very strict SISTER outcome criteria. © 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byKuprasertkul A, Christie A, Lemack G and Zimmern P (2019) Long-Term Results of Burch and Autologous Sling Procedures for Stress Urinary Incontinence in E-SISTEr Participants at 1 SiteJournal of Urology, VOL. 202, NO. 6, (1224-1229), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2019. Volume 187Issue 4SApril 2012Page: e480-e481 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Philippe Zimmern Dallas, TX More articles by this author Hong Zhao Dallas, TX More articles by this author Tamara Dickinson Dallas, TX More articles by this author Xian-Jin Xie Dallas, TX More articles by this author Gary Lemack Dallas, TX More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...