Office Blood Pressure Research Articles

Absolute cardiovascular risk assessment using ‘real world’ clinic blood pressures compared to standardized unobserved and ambulatory methods: an observational study

Clinic blood pressure (BP) is recommended for absolute cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment. However, in ‘real-world’ settings, clinic BP measurement is unstandardised and less reliable compared to more rigorous methods but the impact for absolute CVD risk assessment is unknown. This study aimed to determine the difference in absolute CVD risk assessment using real-world clinic BP compared to standardised BP methods. Participants were patients (n = 226, 59 ± 15 years; 58% female) with hypertension referred to a BP clinic for assessment. ‘Real-world’ clinic BP was provided by the referring doctor. All participants had unobserved automated office BP (AOBP) and 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) measured at the clinic. Absolute CVD risk was calculated (Framingham) using systolic BP from the referring doctor (clinic BP), AOBP and ABPM, with agreement assessed by Kappa statistic. Clinic systolic BP was 18 mmHg than AOBP and daytime ABPM and 22 mmHg higher than 24-h ABPM (p < 0.001). Subsequently, absolute CVD risk scores using clinic BP were higher compared to AOBP, daytime ABPM and 24-h ABPM (10.4 ± 8.1%, 7.8 ± 6.4%, 7.8 ± 6.3%, and 7.3 ± 6.1%, respectively, P < 0.001). As a result, more participants were classified as high CVD risk using clinic BP (n = 89, 40%) compared with AOBP (n = 44, 20%) daytime ABPM (n = 38, 17%) and 24-h ABPM (n = 38, 17%) (p < 0.001) with weak agreement in risk classification (κ = 0.57[0.45–0.69], κ = 0.52[0.41–0.64] and κ = 0.55[0.43–0.66], respectively). Real-world clinic BP was higher and classified twice as many participants at high CVD risk compared to AOBP or ABPM. Given the challenges to high-quality BP measurement in clinic, more rigorous BP measurement methods are needed for absolute CVD risk assessment.

Randomized Trials of Renal Denervation for Uncontrolled Hypertension: An Updated Meta-Analysis.

Despite optimal medical therapy, a significant proportion of patients' blood pressure remains uncontrolled. Catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) has been proposed as a potential intervention for uncontrolled hypertension. We conducted an updated meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of RDN in patients with uncontrolled hypertension, with emphasis on the differential effect of RDN in patients on and off antihypertensive medications. Online databases were searched to identify randomized clinical trials comparing efficacy and safety of RDN versus control in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Subgroup analyses were conducted for sham-controlled trials and studies that used RDN devices that have gained or are currently seeking US Food and Drug Administration approval. Fifteen trials with 2581 patients (RDN, 1723; sham, 858) were included. In patients off antihypertensive medications undergoing RDN, a significant reduction in 24-hour ambulatory (-3.70 [95% CI, -5.41 to -2.00] mm Hg), office (-4.76 [95% CI, -7.57 to -1.94] mm Hg), and home (-3.28 [95% CI, -5.96 to -0.61] mm Hg) systolic blood pressures was noted. In patients on antihypertensive medications, a significant reduction was observed in 24-hour ambulatory (-2.23 [95% CI, -3.56 to -0.90] mm Hg), office (-6.39 [95% CI, -11.49 to -1.30]), home (-6.08 [95% CI, -11.54 to -0.61] mm Hg), daytime (-2.62 [95% CI, -4.14 to -1.11]), and nighttime (-2.70 [95% CI, -5.13 to -0.27]) systolic blood pressures, as well as 24-hour ambulatory (-1.16 [95% CI, -1.96 to -0.35]), office (-3.17 [95% CI, -5.54 to -0.80]), and daytime (-1.47 [95% CI, -2.50 to -0.27]) diastolic blood pressures. RDN significantly lowers blood pressure in patients with uncontrolled hypertension, in patients off and on antihypertensive medications, with a favorable safety profile. The efficacy of RDN was consistent in sham-controlled trials and contemporary trials using US Food and Drug Administration-approved devices.

Catheter-Based Radiofrequency Renal Denervation in the United States: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Based on Contemporary Evidence

BackgroundCatheter-based radiofrequency renal denervation (RF RDN) has recently been approved as an adjunctive treatment for hypertensive patients without adequate blood pressure control. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of RF RDN in the United States based on contemporary clinical evidence. MethodsA decision-analytic Markov model projected costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALY), and clinical events for an active cohort treated with RF RDN and a control cohort treated with standard-of-care (defined as 1, 2, or 3 antihypertensive medications). Cohort demographics and therapy effect were derived from the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED study demonstrating an absolute 9.9 mm Hg reduction in office systolic blood pressure and 4.9 mm Hg reduction compared with sham control. Clinical event risk reduction from blood pressure lowering was based on a meta-regression of 47 hypertension trials. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was evaluated against willingness-to-pay thresholds of $50,000 per QALY (high value) and $150,000 per QALY (intermediate value). Extensive scenario and sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess robustness of the findings. ResultsRF RDN yielded a significant risk reduction in clinical events (0.80 for stroke, 0.88 for myocardial infarction, and 0.85 for cardiovascular death over 10 years). Over lifetime, RF RDN added 0.34 QALY at an additional cost of $11,275, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $32,732 per QALY. The cost-effectiveness of RF RDN was robust across a broad range of scenarios and sensitivity analyses. ConclusionsBased on a lifetime projection, catheter-based RF RDN is a cost-effective, high-value intervention for hypertensive patients with uncontrolled hypertension.

SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC AND CLINICAL PREDICTORS OF FAILURE TO ACHIEVE THE TARGET LEVEL OF BLOOD PRESSURE IN OUTPATIENTS WITH ISOLATED ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION AND IN COMBINATION WITH CARDIOVASCULAR COMORBIDITY

The problem of achieving the target level of blood pressure (TBP) is extremely relevant today, as arterial hypertension (AH) is the leading modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular complications.The aim of the study is to investigate the relationships between achievement/failure of TBP and socio-demographic and clinical characteristics in outpatients with isolated AH and in combination with cardiovascular comorbidity and to determine probable predictors of failure to achieve TBP.Material and methods. The study was carried out on the basis of the municipal non-profit enterprise “Gulsk outpatient clinic for general practice of family medicine” of the Strievsky village council, the village of Striyevo, Zvyagelsky district, Zhytomyr region The study involved 140 patients with AH, divided into three groups: isolated AH (n=60), AH+coronary heart disease (CHD) (n=35), AH+CHD+chronic heart failure (HF) (n=45). Patients were considered to have achieved the TBP if their office BP was &lt;140/90 mm Hg when measured twice with an interval of 1 month.Results. The absence of statistically significant changes according to achievement/failure of TBP between outpatients with isolated AH and AH with cardiovascular comorbidity (χ2=3.37; p=0.185) was revealed, while in the group with isolated AH 65.00%, in the group with AH + CHD – 45.71%, in the group of AH + CHD + HF – 57.78% of people did not reach the TBP. Analyzing the relationships between the achievement/failure of TBP and age, gender, social status and modifiable risk factors (smoking, alcohol abuse and salt abuse), statistically significant differences were found only in relation to salt abuse in outpatients with AH and cardiovascular comorbidity (in the group of AH + CHD 100.00%, and in the group AH + CHD + HF 96.15% of people who abuse salt did not reach the TBP). The results of the logistic regression analysis showed that the female gender is by 4.1 times more likely to be associated with failure to achieve TBP compared to the male gender in the group with isolated AH, by 3.5 times – in the group of AH+CHD, by 3.4 times – in the group of AH+CHD+HF; salt abuse increases the risk of not reaching the TBP in the group with isolated AH by 19.4 times; by 20.8 times – in the group of AH + CHD; by 21.1times – in the group of AH + CHD + HF. Analyzing the relationship between achievement/failure of TBP and clinical characteristics of outpatients with isolated AH, the duration of the disease in persons who did not reach TBP is 2.0 times longer than the catamnesis of persons who reached TBP (p&lt;0.001); the degree and stage of arterial hypertension significantly affects achievement/failure of TBP (χ2=22.27; p&lt;0.001 and χ2=7.66; p=0.022, respectively). The results of the logistic regression analysis show that an increase in BP (in particular, each subsequent degree of AH) is more often associated with failure to achieve TBP both in patients with isolated AH and in patients with AH and cardiovascular comorbidity: by 2.7 times in the group with isolated AH; by 2.8 times in the group of AH + CHD; by 3.0 times – in the group of AH+CHD+HF.Conclusions. Female gender, salt abuse, and the degree of AH are statistically significant factors associated with an increased risk of not reaching the target blood pressure level both in outpatients with isolated AH and in patients with AH combined with cardiovascular comorbidity.

А COMPREHENSIVE STUDY OF PATIENTS WITH ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE: AGE, GENDER, AND COMORBIDITY ASPECTS

The purpose of the study was to analyze the clinical characteristics, comorbid status, individual biochemical indicators, and systemic inflammation activity in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) depending on age, gender distribution, and diagnosis influence.Materials and methods. The study included 144 patients with IHD, who were divided into two groups – the main and the control. The main group comprised 120 patients with stable angina pectoris (SAP) II-III functional class (FC). The control group consisted of 24 patients with STEMI. All patients underwent a comprehensive examination: general clinical, anthropometric, laboratory (complete blood count, biochemical analysis), and instrumental (office blood pressure measurement, heart rate, and echocardiography). The comorbid profile of patients with IHD was assessed using the Charlson comorbidity index. The severity of systemic inflammation syndrome in the selected patient groups was assessed by the cellular composition of peripheral blood upon admission to the hospital, and based on the obtained data, the values of leukocyte inflammatory markers were calculated.Results. Patients in the main group were younger than those in the control group (54.78 ± 1.11 vs. 63.50 ± 1.82) (p&lt;0.001). A statistically significant predominance of men over women was found among the cohort of IHD patients (63.33% and 36.67%, respectively) (p&lt;0.001), with a tendency towards male predominance among patients with SAP II-III FC compared to those with STEMI (p = 0.074). Patients in the main group compared to those in the control group had significantly higher left ventricular ejection fraction (p&lt;0.001), systolic blood pressure (p&lt;0.001), and diastolic blood pressure (p=0.001). In the control group compared to the main group, more cases of patients with high levels of comorbidity were found (p&lt;0.001). Lower levels of creatinine, fibrinogen, prothrombin time, and glucose were observed in patients in the main group. Patients with SAP II-III FC compared to those with STEMI had lower levels of leukocyte inflammatory markers, such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (p&lt;0.001), systemic immune inflammation index (SII) (p=0.002), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) (p=0.007), and aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI) (p=0.011).Conclusions. The study underscores the need for an individualized approach to each patient with ischemic heart disease, considering their age, gender, and comorbid characteristics, as well as laboratory peculiarities, to improve therapy outcomes and prevent complications.

Time in therapeutic range and risk of preeclampsia in chronic hypertensive pregnant women.

Pregnancy Hypertensive Disorders (PHD), particularly Preeclampsia (PE), are significant contributors to maternal-fetal morbidity and mortality, with chronic arterial hypertension (CH) being a major risk factor. The prevalence of CH has risen alongside obesity and advanced maternal age. While antihypertensive treatment mitigates adverse pregnancy outcomes, the duration of effective blood pressure (BP) control, termed Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR), has not been extensively studied in pregnant women. TTR, reflecting the proportion of time BP remains within target ranges, predicts long-term cardiovascular and renal events in the general population but remains unexplored in pregnancy. This study investigates the association between TTR, assessed through office BP (OBP) and ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), and PE development in pregnant women with CH. In a retrospective longitudinal study, data from 166 pregnant women with HA referred to our hospital analyzed. BP was measured using OBP and ABPM from 10 weeks of gestation, with TTR calculated as the percentage of visits where BP remained within target ranges. The study defined four TTR control groups: 0%, 33%, 50-66%, and 100%. Results showed that 28% of the participants developed PE, with a higher incidence correlating with lower TTR in ABPM. TTR in ABPM was a significant predictor of PE risk, with the best-controlled group (100% TTR) demonstrating a 92% reduced risk compared to those with 0% TTR. The agreement between OBP and ABPM TTR was low, emphasizing the importance of ABPM for accurate BP monitoring in pregnancy. This study indicates that integrating ABPM for TTR assessment in high-risk pregnancies has the potential to reduce maternal and fetal complications.

Rationality and implication of catheter-based adrenal ablation for bilateral primary aldosteronism.

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) for bilateral primary aldosteronism (PA) are the mainstay option recommended by guidelines, but poor compliance occurs due to numerous side effects. We aimed to examine whether catheter-based adrenal ablation could be an alternative treatment for bilateral PA.644 PA patients were included from a total of 6054 hypertensive patients. Adrenal CT scan and adrenal venous sampling (AVS) were both performed for PA subtype classification. Clinical and biochemical outcomes were assessed at 6 months after treatment according to the Primary Aldosteronism Surgical Outcome (PASO) criteria.93 patients with PA were recruited to be treated by adrenal ablation, including 25 bilateral PA and 68 unilateral PA according to AVS results. Office SBP and DBP significantly decreased from baseline levels, serum potassium levels increased and ARR significantly decreased (p < 0.01) in both the bilateral and unilateral groups. In the bilateral group, complete, partial and absent clinical success was achieved in 6 (24.0%), 11 (44.0%) and 8(32.0%) patients, respectively. In the unilateral group, complete, partial and absent clinical success was achieved in 12 (17.6%), 37 (54.4%), and 19 (27.9%) patients, respectively. The numbers of patients achieving complete, partial, and absent biochemical success were 15 (60.0%), 6 (24.0%), and 4 (16.0%), respectively, in the bilateral group versus 37 (54.4%), 9 (13.2%), and 22 (32.3%), respectively, in the unilateral group. In conclusion, we provide evidence for the beneficial outcomes of unilateral adrenal ablation for patients with bilateral PA. Our findings provide insight into an alternative option for patients with bilateral excess aldosterone.

Ambulatory Blood Pressure Phenotypes, Arterial Stiffness And Cardiac Remodelling.

Evidence on the association of arterial stiffness and left ventricular (LV) concentric remodelling/ LVH assessed by echocardiography, with abnormal blood pressure (BP) phenotypes, defined by office and ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) in the community is scanty. We investigated this issue in the participants to the Pressioni Monitorate E Loro Associazioni (PAMELA) study. The study included 491 participants who attended the second and third survey of the PAMELA study performed after 10 and 25 years from the initial evaluation. Data collection included medical history, anthropometric parameters, blood examinations, office, ABPM, echocardiographic and Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index (CAVI) measurements. In the whole study sample (age 66+10 years, 50% males), the prevalence rates of sustained normotension (NT), white coat hypertension (WCH), masked hypertension (MH), sustained hypertension (SH) and non-dipping (ND) were 31.2, 10.0, 24.2, 34.6, and 35.8% and respectively. The likelihood of having SH, the BP phenotype carrying the greatest CV risk, was four times higher (OR= 4.31, CI:2.39-7.76, p<0.0001) in participants with increased CAVI and LV remodelling/LVH compared to their counterparts without organ damage. This association showed an incremental value in discriminating SH compared to both isolated markers of organ damage (OR=1.92,p=0.03 for increased CAVI and OR= 2.02, p=0.02 for LV remodelling/LVH). The presence of isolated but also combined organ damage was unrelated to ND. Our study provides new evidence of the incremental value of looking for both vascular and cardiac organ damage to optimize the identification and clinical management of SH in the general population.

Is unattended automated office blood pressure measurement truly not superior to office blood pressure measurement in predicting hypertension-mediated organ damage?

Is unattended automated office blood pressure measurement truly not superior to office blood pressure measurement in predicting hypertension-mediated organ damage?

Blood pressure variability assessed by office, home, and ambulatory measurements before and during antihypertensive drug treatment: a sub-analysis of the REVERENT randomized trial.

Blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) can be assessed using office (OBP), home (HBP), or ambulatory BP (ABP) measurements. This analysis investigated the association and agreement between OBP, HBP, and ABP measurements for BPV assessment at baseline and 10 weeks after initiating antihypertensive drug therapy. Untreated hypertensive patients with elevated BPV were randomized to receive an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ramipril) or a calcium channel blocker (nifedipine GITS) in a 10-week, open-label, blinded-end point study. BPV was assessed using standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) (reading-to-reading analyses). Data from 146 participants from three research centers (Athens/Greece; Milan/Italy; Shanghai/China) were analyzed [mean age 53 ± 10 (SD) years, male individuals 60%, baseline systolic OBP, HBP, and 24 h ABP 144 ± 9, 138 ± 10, and 143 ± 10 mmHg, respectively]. Post-treatment minus pre-treatment systolic CV difference was: OBP: 0.3%, P = 0.28; HBP: -0.2%, P = 0.20; 24 h ABP: 1.1%, P < 0.001. Home and ambulatory (not office) BPV indices presented weak-to-moderate correlation, both before and during treatment (range of coefficients 0.04-0.33). The correlation coefficient between systolic HBP and awake ABP CV was 0.21 and 0.28 before and during treatment, respectively ( P < 0.05/< 0.001, respectively). Home and ambulatory (not office) BPV indices presented slight-to-fair agreement (range 64-73%) in detecting participants with high systolic BPV (top quartile of respective distributions) both before and during treatment (kappa range 0.04-0.27). These data showed a weak-to-moderate association between out-of-office (but not office) BPV indices both before and during BP-lowering treatment, with reasonable agreement in detecting individuals with high BPV. Out-of-office BP measurements provide more similar and consistent BPV information than office measurements.

700.11 - Systematic Review of Renal Denervation for Uncontrolled Hypertension: Meta-Analysis Results for Office, 24-Hour, and Daytime Ambulatory Blood Pressure

700.11 - Systematic Review of Renal Denervation for Uncontrolled Hypertension: Meta-Analysis Results for Office, 24-Hour, and Daytime Ambulatory Blood Pressure

Improvement of non-adherence and reduction of BP values in patients with difficult-to-treat hypertension: the ATHAN clinical trial.

Hypertension treatment and blood pressure (BP) control reduce cardiovascular disease burden. However, prevalence of controlled BP is overall insufficient and lack of adherence to treatment is a suggested major contributor. This prospective, randomized clinical trial was designed to evaluate whether a specific 3-month (m) action plan to improve therapeutic adherence results in a decrease in BP. Patients with ambulatory 24 h-BP ≥ 130/80 mmHg despite receiving ≥2 antihypertensive drugs and with therapeutic non-compliance confirmed by antihypertensive drugs analyzed in urine were randomized (1:1) to receive a specific 3 m program to improve adherence (INT = intervention) or routine follow-up (C = control). Antihypertensive treatment was not modified and knowledge of non-adherence was only notified to patients randomized to the intervention group. Before randomization and at 3 m all patients underwent urinary screening for antihypertensive drugs and 24 h-ambulatory-BP monitoring. Forty-five patients (36% women, mean age: 58 ± 13 yr) were randomized. At 3 m, mean (95% CI) BP differences (INT vs. C) were 12.2 mmHg (4.3-20.8), adjusted-p = 0.032 and 8.7 mmHg (2.5-14.8), adjusted-p = 0.018 for 24 h-systolic and 24 h-diastolic BP, respectively. Differences (INT vs. C) for office SBP and DBP were 18.4 mmHg (6.8-30.1), adjusted-p = 0.005 and 15.7 mmHg (7.2-24.2), adjusted-p < 0.001. Non-detected antihypertensive drugs were median [IQR]: 40% [25-100] and 0% [0-20] at baseline and 3 m, respectively, in the INT group, and 33.3% [25-63.7] and 33.3% [23.8-57.9], in the C group (p < 0.001 for the 3-month between-group comparison). A combined action plan of notifying knowledge of non-adherence plus a 3-month specific nursing intervention to improve therapeutic adherence results in BP reduction in patients with inadequate therapeutic compliance.

White-coat effect and masked hypertension in patients with high-normal office blood pressure: results of the Hungarian ABPM Registry.

Blood pressure (BP) lowering therapy in hypertension can markedly reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases. In case of high-normal office blood pressure (oBP), the initiation of antihypertensive medication is recommended by guidelines in patients with very high cardiovascular risk. The aims of this study were to evaluate the presence of white-coat high-normal BP (WhHNBP) and masked hypertension in high-normal oBP and to explore the prevalence of untreated very high cardiovascular risk patients. Data of the Hungarian Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) Registry between September 2020 and November 2023 were used in our analysis. From 38 720 uploaded ABPM curves with clinical data, 4300 individuals were categorized as having high-normal oBP. Among those, 3285 (76.4%) were on antihypertensive treatment. Based on the ABPM recordings, high-normal BP was confirmed in 20.5% ( n = 881), while WhHNBP was present in 27.6% ( n = 1188) and masked hypertension in 51.9% ( n = 2231). Similar results were found in treated and untreated subjects or patients as well. Independent predictors of WhHNBP were age [odds ratio (OR) 1.02 (95% confidence interval, 95% CI: 1.01-1.02), P < 0.001], female sex [OR: 1.59 (1.32-1.92), P < 0.001] and snoring [OR: 0.70 (0.57-0.86), P < 0.001]. Independent predictors of masked hypertension were male sex [OR: 1.31 (1.12-1.54), P < 0.001] and obesity [OR: 1.71 (1.39-2.09), P < 0.001]. Five hundred and two individuals had very high cardiovascular risk with high-normal oBP and only 25 of them were untreated. In high-normal oBP, WhHNBP or masked hypertension is present in three out of four individuals. Most of the patients with high-normal oBP and very high cardiovascular risk are already treated with antihypertensive drugs.

FOUND Trial: randomised controlled trial study protocol for case finding of obstructive sleep apnoea in primary care using a novel device

IntroductionObstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a common, but underdiagnosed, sleep disorder. If untreated, it leads to poor health outcomes, including Alzheimer’s disease, cancer, cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. Our aim...

Home blood pressure-lowering effect of a non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor blocker, esaxerenone, versus trichlormethiazide for uncontrolled hypertension: the EXCITE-HT randomized controlled study.

The EXCITE-HT study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of esaxerenone versus thiazide diuretics (trichlormethiazide) as second-line treatment for Japanese patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension. This was a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study. The non-inferiority of esaxerenone to trichlormethiazide was confirmed if the upper limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in systolic blood pressure (SBP)/diastolic blood pressure (DBP) change between groups was below 3.9/2.1 mmHg. A total of 295 and 290 patients were included in the esaxerenone and trichlormethiazide groups, respectively. The non-inferiority of esaxerenone to trichlormethiazide was demonstrated: least squares mean change differences in morning home SBP/DBP at end of treatment (EOT) were -2.2 (95% CI, -3.6, -0.8) mmHg for SBP/-0.6 (-1.4, 0.2) mmHg for DBP. Morning home, bedtime home, and office BP significantly decreased (all p < 0.001) from baseline to EOT in both groups. The urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide level decreased from baseline to Week 12 in both groups, with no notable intergroup difference. Serum potassium elevations occurred more frequently with esaxerenone, while serum potassium reductions occurred more with trichlormethiazide. Uric acid elevations were observed in both groups, but more frequently with trichlormethiazide than esaxerenone. No cases of gout occurred in this study. Reductions in estimated glomerular filtration rate were similarly observed in both groups. EXCITE-HT is the first randomized controlled study to demonstrate evidence that esaxerenone is non-inferior to trichlormethiazide as second-line treatment for Japanese patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension, with no new safety concerns. The EXCITE-HT study demonstrated the non-inferiority of esaxerenone to trichlormethiazide in its morning home blood pressure lowering effect and safety profile in Japanese patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension who were previously treated with an angiotensin II receptor blocker or calcium channel blocker.

Efficacy of antihypertensive treatment for target organ protection in patients with masked hypertension (ANTI-MASK): a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Masked hypertension is associated with target organ damage (TOD) and adverse health outcomes, but whether antihypertensive treatment improves TOD in patients with masked hypertension is unproven. In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at 15 Chinese hospitals, untreated outpatients aged 30-70 years with an office blood pressure (BP) of <140/<90mm Hg and 24-h, daytime or nighttime ambulatory BP of ≥130/≥80, ≥135/≥85, or ≥120/≥70mm Hg were enrolled. Patients had ≥1 sign of TOD: electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) ≥1400cm/s, or urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) ≥3.5mg/mmol in women and ≥2.5mg/mmol in men. Exclusion criteria included secondary hypertension, diabetic nephropathy, serum creatinine ≥176.8μmol/L, and cardiovascular disease within 6 months of screening. After stratification for centre, sex and the presence of nighttime hypertension, eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive antihypertensive treatment or placebo. Patients and investigators were masked to group assignment. Active treatment consisted of allisartan starting at 80mg/day, to be increased to 160mg/day at month 2, and to be combined with amlodipine 2.5mg/day at month 4, if the ambulatory BP remained uncontrolled. Matching placebos were used likewise in the control group. The primary endpoint was the improvement of TOD, defined as normalisation of baPWV, ACR or LVH or a ≥20% reduction in baPWV or ACR over the 48-week follow-up. The intention-to-treat analysis included all randomised patients, the per-protocol analysis patients who fully adhered to the protocol, and the safety analysis all patients who received at least one dose of the study medication. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02893358. Between February 14, 2017, and October 31, 2020, 320 patients (43.1% women; mean age±SD 53.7±9.7 years) were enrolled. Baseline office and 24-h BP averaged 130±6.0/81±5.9mm Hg and 136±8.6/84±6.1mm Hg, and the prevalence of elevated baPWV, ACR and LVH were 97.5%, 12.5%, and 7.8%, respectively. The 24-h BP decreased on average (±SE) by 10.1±0.9/6.4±0.5mm Hg in 153 patients on active treatment and by 1.3±0.9/1.0±0.5mm Hg in 167 patients on placebo. Improvement of TOD occurred in 79 patients randomised to active treatment and in 49 patients on placebo: 51.6% (95% CI 43.7%, 59.5%) versus 29.3% (22.1, 36.5%; p<0.0001). Per-protocol and subgroup analyses were confirmatory. Adverse events were generally mild and occurred in 38 (25.3%) and 43 (26.4%) patients randomised to active treatment and placebo, respectively (p=0.83). Our results suggest that antihypertensive treatment improves TOD in patients with masked hypertension, highlighting the need of treatment. However, the long-term benefit in preventing cardiovascular complications still needs to be established. Salubris China.

Differences in the effectiveness and safety of different renal denervation devices.

Renal denervation (RDN) is a minimally invasive, endovascular catheter-based procedure using radiofrequency, ultrasound, or alcohol-mediated ablation to treat resistant hypertension. RDN gained popularity in 2009 when it was shown to have an antihypertensive effect. However, concerns about the efficacy of RDN were raised in the HTN-3 trial published in 2014, and the development of several RDN devices was then discontinued. In the process, new randomized controlled trials were conducted after the development of some of the RDN devices, the quality assurance of the procedure, changes in ablation points, and improvements in study design. In November 2023, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved a radiofrequency RDN device and an ultrasound RDN device. The results of a randomized controlled trial of an alcohol-mediated RDN device have been published, and future trends are being watched closely. In this mini-review, we summarize the differences in the antihypertensive effect and safety of the different RDN devices and the endpoints of the procedure in order to contribute to the further development of RDN devices Currently available renal denervation device. A multielectrode radiofrequency ablation (Spyral), (B) ultrasound denervation (Paraise), and (C) alcohol-mediated perivascular denervation (Peregrine). ASBP ambulatory systolic blood pressure, ADBP ambulatory diastolic blood pressure, OSBP office systolic blood pressure, ODBP office diastolic blood pressure. Analysis according to types of renal denervation device (radiofrequency, ultrasound, or alcohol-mediated device). P values for interaction were 0.578 (ambulatory SBP), 0.499 (ambulatory diastolic BP), 0.853 (office SBP), and 0.870 (office diastolic BP).

Cardiac Structure and Function in 8- to 12-Year-Old Children Following In-Utero Exposure to Preeclampsia (FINNCARE Study).

We evaluated how elevated blood pressure in children exposed to preeclampsia (PE) impacted on their cardiac structure and function, as well as relations with maternal, gestational, and perinatal factors and child body size and composition. A total of 182 PE (46 early-onset preeclampsia) and 85 unexposed (non-PE) children were examined in the FINNCARE study 8 to 12 years after the index pregnancy with echocardiography; office, central, and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressures; and body anthropometrics and composition. PE children had lower right ventricular basal sphericity index (mean difference, -0.26 95% CI, -0.39 to -0.12) and lower mitral lateral E'-wave peak velocity (-1.4 cm/s [95% CI, -2.1 to -0.6]), as well as higher E to E' ratio (0.40 [95% CI, 0.15-0.65]) and indexed tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (0.03 [95% CI, 0.01-0.05]) compared with non-PE children. These differences were accentuated in early-onset PE children. Left ventricular mass (LVM) or left atrial volume were not different between PE and non-PE children. Lean body mass, body fat percentage, and 24-hour systolic blood pressure were independent predictors of LVM. Lean body mass and body fat percentage were independent predictors of left atrial volume. No significant associations between LVM or left atrial volume and maternal, gestational, or perinatal parameters were found. Preadolescent PE children display a more globular-shaped right ventricle with higher longitudinal systolic displacement as well as mildly altered diastolic indices, with the alterations being pronounced in early-onset preeclampsia. Lean body mass and adiposity are independently related with LVM and left atrial volume, and systolic blood pressure with LVM in both PE and non-PE children. These unfavorable associations indicate remodeling of cardiac structure in young children also reflected in mild functional changes in PE children. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; unique identifier: NCT04676295.

Resistant hypertension: diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment a clinical consensus statement from the Thai hypertension society

Resistant hypertension (RH) includes hypertensive patients with uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) while receiving ≥3 BP-lowering medications or with controlled BP while receiving ≥4 BP-lowering medications. The exact prevalence of RH is challenging to quantify. However, a reasonable estimate of true RH is around 5% of the hypertensive population. Patients with RH have higher cardiovascular risk as compared with hypertensive patients in general. Standardized office BP measurement, confirmation of medical adherence, search for drug- or substance-induced BP elevation, and ambulatory or home BP monitoring are mandatory to exclude pseudoresistance. Appropriate further investigations, guided by clinical data, should be pursued to exclude possible secondary causes of hypertension. The management of RH includes the intensification of lifestyle interventions and the modification of antihypertensive drug regimens. The essential aspects of lifestyle modification include sodium restriction, body weight control, regular exercise, and healthy sleep. Step-by-step adjustment of the BP-lowering drugs based on the available evidence is proposed. The suitable choice of diuretics according to patients’ renal function is presented. Sacubitril/valsartan can be carefully substituted for the prior renin-angiotensin system blockers, especially in those with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. If BP remains uncontrolled, device therapy such as renal nerve denervation should be considered. Since device-based treatment is an invasive and costly procedure, it should be used only after careful and appropriate case selection. In real-world practice, the management of RH should be individualized depending on each patient’s characteristics.

Cutoffs for white-coat and masked blood pressure effects: an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring study.

The values used to define white-coat and masked blood pressure (BP) effects are usually arbitrary. This study aimed at investigating the accuracy of various cutoffs based on the differences (ΔBP) between office BP (OBP) and 24h-ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) to identify white-coat (WCH) and masked (MH) hypertension, which are phenotypes coupled with adverse prognosis. This cross-sectional study included 11,350 [Derivation cohort; 45% men, mean age = 55.1 ± 14.1 years, OBP = 132.1 ± 17.6/83.9 ± 12.5 mmHg, 24 h-ABPM = 121.6 ± 11.4/76.1 ± 9.6 mmHg, 25% using antihypertensive medications (AH)] and 7220 (Validation cohort; 46% men, mean age = 58.6 ± 15.1 years, OBP = 136.8 ± 18.7/87.6 ± 13.0 mmHg, 24 h-ABPM = 125.5 ± 12.6/77.7 ± 10.3 mmHg; 32% using AH) unique individuals who underwent 24 h-ABPM. We compared the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and area under the curve (AUC) of diverse ΔBP cutoffs to detect WCH (ΔsystolicBP/ΔdiastolicBP = 28/17, 20/15, 20/10, 16/11, 15/9, 14/9 mmHg and ΔsystolicBP = 13 and 10 mmHg) and MH (ΔsystolicBP/ΔdiastolicBP = -14/-9, -5/-2, -3/-1, -1/-1, 0/0, 2/2 mmHg and ΔsystolicBP = -5 and -3mmHg). The 20/15 mmHg cutoff showed the best AUC (0.804, 95%CI = 0.794-0.814) to detect WCH, while the 2/2 mmHg cutoff showed the highest AUC (0.741, 95%CI = 0.728-0.754) to detect MH in the Derivation cohort. Both cutoffs also had the best accuracy to detect WCH (0.767, 95%CI = 0.754-0.780) and MH (0.767, 95%CI = 0.750-0.784) in the Validation cohort. In secondary analyses, these cutoffs had the best accuracy to detect individuals with higher and lower office-than-ABPM grades in both cohorts. In conclusion, the 20/15 and 2/2 mmHg ΔBP cutoffs had the best accuracy to detect hypertensive patients with WCH and MH, respectively, and can serve as indicators of marked white-coat and masked BP effects derived from 24 h-ABPM.