Off-label Indications Research Articles

On-label and off-label prescribing patterns of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in inpatient hospitalsettings in the US during the period ofmajorregulatory changes.

A number of policy and labeling interventions aimed at reducing inappropriate prescribing of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) were implemented in the U.S. between 2006 and 2010. These interventions included the addition of an FDA Black Box Warning to ESA labeling, the implementation of a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy program, and the adoption of payment restrictions by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The impact of these safety interventions on different types of ESA prescribing (on-label, off-label; evidence-based, not evidence-based) has not been investigated in a single study. The objective of this study was to explore the prescribing patterns of ESAs for on- and off-label indications in the U.S. hospital inpatients during the period of major policy and labeling changes. A retrospective analysis of ESAs utilization patterns was conducted using Cerner Health Facts® database from January 1, 2005 to June 30, 2011. The study population consisted of adult patients admitted to hospitals during the study period who received at least one ESAs order. Indications for ESA use were assigned based on ICD-9CM diagnosis codes, procedure codes, and medication records. ESA use was then classified based on FDA-approval and the strength of scientific evidence supporting its use. Indication categories included (1) on-label use (ONS); (2) off-label use, supported (OFS); and (3) off-label use, unsupported (OFU). Descriptive statistics were used to examine ESA use by patient, hospital, and physician characteristics and over time. ESAs were most frequently prescribed for ONS (48.7%), followed by OFU (42.7%) and OFS indications (8.6%). Of all off-label use, 83.2% were for unsupported indications. Between 2005 and 2010, the percent of inpatient visits with ESA use decreased for supported indications, both on-label (-63.2%) and off-label (-78.2%), but increased for unsupported indications (80%). OFU use surpassed ONS use as the most common type of ESA use in2009. Total and ONS ESA use decreased markedly, while OFU ESA use continued to increase during the period of major policy and labeling changes.

Use and Future Investigations of Recombinant and Plasma-Derived Coagulation and Anticoagulant Products in the Neonate.

Although congenital bleeding disorders can manifest in the newborn period, the most common causes of bleeding and thrombosis in neonates are acquired conditions. Factor concentrates are used for specific diagnoses (hemophilia with inhibitors, specific factor deficiency, von Willebrand disease) and approved indications, and increasingly for off-label indications (bleeding in surgery cardiopulmonary bypass, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation). We will review the approved indications for factor products in the neonate and discuss the evidence and rationale for off-label use of factor products in management of bleeding and thrombosis in the neonate.

Ivabradine: A Review of Labeled and Off-Label Uses.

Ivabradine is a unique medication recently approved in the USA for the treatment of select heart failure patients. It was first approved for use in several countries around the world over a decade ago as an anti-anginal agent, with subsequent approval for use in heart failure patients. Since ivabradine has selective activity blocking the I f currents in the sinus node, it can reduce heart rate without appreciable effects on blood pressure. Given this heart-rate-specific effect, it has been investigated in many off-label indications as an alternative to traditional heart-rate-reducing medications such as beta blockers and calcium channel blockers. We conducted searches of PubMed and Google Scholar for ivabradine, heart failure, HFrEF, HFpEF, angina, coronary artery disease, inappropriate sinus tachycardia, postural orthostatic hypotension, coronary computed tomography angiography and atrial fibrillation. We reviewed and included studies, case reports, and case series published between 1980 and June 2016 if they provided information relevant to the practicing clinician. In many cases, larger clinical trials are needed to solidify the benefit of ivabradine, although studies indicate benefit in most therapeutic areas explored to date. The purpose of this paper is to review the current labeled and off-label uses of ivabradine, with a focus on clinical trial data.

Aripiprazole and Acute Extrapyramidal Symptoms in Children and Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis.

BackgroundBoth the US FDA and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) have approved aripiprazole for use in adolescents for specific indications. Given the assumed favorable side-effect profile of aripiprazole, its use in children and adolescents has increased for both official and off-label indications (anxiety disorders, eating disorders, personality disorders). However, several cases of children and adolescents with new-onset extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) after commencing treatment with aripiprazole have been reported, and a more systematic appraisal of this possible risk is lacking.ObjectiveWe conducted a systematic review and a meta-analysis to assess the evidence for acute EPS (acute dystonia, akathisia, Parkinsonism) associated with the use of aripiprazole in children and adolescents.MethodWe searched the MEDLINE and Embase databases (2003–10 April 2016) for clinical trials in pediatric patients (aged 0–18 years) using the keywords ‘aripiprazole’ (regardless of the formulation) and ‘extrapyramidal symptoms’. We evaluated the abstracts of papers using the following exclusion criteria: (1) study design: case report, letter to the editor, editorial, or poster presentation data; (2) unrelated PICOS (population, intervention, comparators, outcomes, study) structure. We performed a meta-analysis, in which we used effect sizes with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). To examine the homogeneity of the effect size distribution, we used a Q-statistic. When we observed heterogeneity in effect sizes, we assessed the possible influence of moderator variables (age and sex, mean dose, study duration, and method of measuring EPS incidence) and evaluated the suitability of either a fixed or a random model. Finally, we assessed the incidence of EPS in children and adolescents treated with aripiprazole compared with placebo.ResultsAn initial search via PubMed and Embase yielded 328 hits. A manual search of the reference lists of review papers revealed seven additional relevant articles. We included 41 studies, with 2114 pediatric patients, in the meta-analysis. For the analysis of the mean incidence of EPS, data were provided by 24 studies, with a total of 1446 pediatric patients. Meta-analysis revealed a mean EPS incidence of 17.1 % (95 % CI 0.128–0.223). In terms of the incidence of various extrapyramidal side effects, overall, no significant effects of age, sex, mean dose, study duration, or measuring method could be demonstrated. The side effects ‘EPS’, ‘parkinsonism’, and ‘tremor’ were significantly more common in children and adolescents treated with aripiprazole than in those treated with placebo.ConclusionOur meta-analysis provides evidence for a non-negligible incidence of acute EPS in children and adolescents treated with aripiprazole. Although the study has several limitations and further investigation is needed, these findings may help clinicians make more balanced treatment choices and more closely monitor the use of this drug in youth.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40263-016-0367-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

High rates of off-label use in antibiotic prescriptions in a context of dramatic resistance increase: a prospective study in a tertiary hospital

The use of antibiotics, as any other drug, is regulated by the terms of its marketing authorisation, notified in the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC). If a prescription is not in accordance with the SPC, the physician prescribes off-label. There is very little literature regarding off-label use of antibiotics in adult healthcare facilities. A prospective monocentric study was conducted during 11 days from February to June 2015 in hospitalised patients from a tertiary teaching hospital with a high prevalence of multidrug-resistant organism colonisation to evaluate off-label use of antibiotics. Two independent experts assessed whether prescriptions complied with the latest guidelines in infectious diseases and whether off-label use of antibiotics was associated with an increased risk of adverse events. In total, 160 antibiotic prescriptions were analysed, of which 76 (47.5%) were off-label. Of the 76 off-label prescriptions, 50 (65.8%) were off-label regarding indications and 26 (34.2%) regarding doses. Nevertheless, 46/50 off-label indications (92.0%) and only 14/26 off-label doses (53.8%) were approved by experts, especially because of dose adjustment requirements. During follow-up, the rate of reported adverse events was not statistically different between patients with (n = 76) and without (n = 84) off-label prescriptions (P = 0.35). In a context of multidrug resistance and a lack of new drugs, high rates (47.5%) of antibiotic off-label use were observed in our hospital, but without an increased rate of adverse events. Moreover, 78.9% of off-label uses were in accordance with guidelines. Therefore, the SPC is not the warrant of an appropriate use of antibiotics.

Off-label use of oral fluoroquinolone antibiotics in outpatient settings in the United States, 2006 to 2012.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the practice pattern of off-label use of fluoroquinolones (FQs) in ambulatory settings and to identify the related risk factors. The National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys from 2006 through 2012 was used to identify subjects who received FQ off-label prescriptions. We defined off-label use as the use of FQs for indications other than those in the FDA-approved drug label. Descriptive statistics were calculated by using a series of weighted chi-squared statistics. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to identify factors associated with off-label FQ drug use. There were 93 million ambulatory visits in which an FQ was prescribed, and 53.16% of these visits involved the prescribing of FQs in an off-label manner. The percentage of off-label prescriptions was the highest among individuals ≥80 years old (61.6%) and male patients (60.9%). The FQ drug prescribed most for an off-label indication in our study was ciprofloxacin (29.5% of the total visits). The multivariate analysis showed that age of ≥80 years and male patient was significantly associated with off-label use of FQs (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 3.66, 1.72-7.80 and OR 3.26, 2.32-4.56, respectively). Medicaid or private insurance versus Medicare were associated with significantly higher off-label prescribing of FQs (OR 2.53, 1.28-5.01 and 1.77, 1.03-3.03, respectively). The percentage of visits involving off-label FQs in US ambulatory settings is substantial. Efforts are needed consolidate and evaluate what high-quality scientific evidence is available and what is needed to support the safety and effectiveness of such off-label uses. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Drug Utilization Patterns and Costs of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents in an Outpatient Setting in Greece

Anemia in the elderly is often related to a higher prevalence of chronic diseases such as chronic kidney failure, arthritis, and malignancy. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) have been used for years to effectively treat anemia and when used appropriately can substantially improve the health status and quality of life of older adults. Following the 2008 recession in Greece, the government introduced ESA price control restrictions, but no prescribing restrictions, in an effort to reduce drug expenditure. ESA prescribing patterns and treatment costs were analyzed to determine inappropriate or appropriate use of these agents and related health care resources in Greece. A retrospective register-based drug utilization study was carried out using data from prescriptions dispensed at the public pharmacy of the largest social insurance fund (IKA-ETAM), for patients receiving ESAs over a six-month period. For each patient, demographic data, ESA dosage regimen, treatment indication and cost, prescriber specialty, and prescription origin were recorded. A total of 14,387 prescriptions from 6,074 patients (median age 74 years) were reviewed. A substantial number of patients (13.5%) were treated for off-label indications, for which the average cost per patient per indication was higher. ESA dosage/frequency of administration varied but was in accordance with recommendations. The percentage of patients who received innovator and biosimilar erythropoietin (EPO) was 88% and 12%, respectively. For the optimization of ESA utilization and the reduction of treatment costs, strict ESA prescription monitoring, development of registries, and criteria for off-label indications and biosimilar use in naive patients under the umbrella of risk-sharing agreements should be proposed.

Anti-inflammatory panacea? The expanding therapeutics of interleukin-1 blockade.

Blockade of interleukin (IL)-1 signaling is one of the oldest biologic therapies, yet the use of these agents is on the rise as the role of IL-1 activation is being recognized in a wide spectrum of inflammatory disorders. This review will cover established and emerging uses of IL-1 antagonism in rheumatic diseases. Expanding off-label indications for IL-1 blockade include neutrophil-dominant skin diseases, including pyoderma gangrenosum, hidradenitis supperativa, and pustular psoriasis. There is also increasing evidence for the use of IL-1 blockade in heart failure associated with rheumatic diseases. Somatic mosaicism in NLRP3 may explain the onset of later-in-life presentations of periodic fevers which are responsive to IL-1 blockade. Of importance, clinical response to anti-IL-1 therapy does not always denote protection from autoinflammatory disease complications such as macrophage activation syndrome or amyloidosis. Indications for IL-1 blocking therapies will likely continue to broaden, but given the rarity of many rheumatic diseases which respond to such treatment, rigorous, large clinical trials for each indication are unlikely to occur. Thus, recommended use of these medications will often fall to the discretion of the astute physician. However, medication cost and hurdles of insurance approval, rather than drug efficacy, may be the primary limitation for more widespread use.

Pediatric Glaucoma: Pharmacotherapeutic Options.

Childhood glaucoma is a major therapeutic challenge for pediatric ophthalmologists and glaucoma specialists worldwide. Management depends on the etiology and age at presentation. A variety of drugs are available for the control of intraocular pressure in children; however, none of these drugs have been licensed by the regulatory agencies for use in children. Furthermore, evidence gained from randomized controlled trials in the pediatric population is sparse, and little is known regarding the use of newer anti-glaucoma preparations. This evidence-based review aims to discuss the available pharmacotherapeutic options for glaucoma in children. Topical adrenoceptor blockers, topical and systemic carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, prostaglandin (PG) analogs, adrenoceptor agonists, parasympathomimetics, and combined preparations are available for use in children, but usually as an off-label indication. Therefore, it is important to recognize that serious side effects have been reported, even with topical drops, and measures to reduce systemic absorption should be taken. Most drugs have been shown to have comparable ocular hypotensive effects, with the lowest occurrence of systemic side effects with PG analogs. Whereas a newly introduced prostaglandin analog, tafluprost, and some other preservative-free preparations have shown promising results in adult glaucoma patients, no pediatric reports are available as yet. Future studies may describe their role in treating pediatric glaucoma. This review also shares some suggested treatment pathways for primary congenital glaucoma (PCG), juvenile open angle glaucoma (JOAG), developmental glaucoma, aphakic/pseudophakic glaucoma, and uveitic glaucoma.

Clinical outcomes following "off-label" versus "established" indications of bioresorbable scaffolds for the treatment of coronary artery disease in a real-world population.

Our aim was to investigate one-year outcomes in patients treated with bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) for "off-label" versus currently "established" indications. Consecutive patients treated with BRS between May 2012 and September 2014 in two centres were retrospectively recruited. Patients who met inclusion criteria as defined by the ABSORB III study were allocated to the established indication group (ESTG; 21 patients with 35 lesions) and the remaining patients to the off-label group (OFLG; 168 patients with 225 lesions). Target vessel failure (TVF) and ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation (id-TLR) at one year were evaluated in both groups. Patients in the OFLG had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus and longer lesion length. Predilatation, post-dilatation and intracoronary imaging were conducted in the majority of patients. At one-year follow-up, TVF (0% vs. 7.8%, p=0.32) and id-TLR (0% vs. 4.5%, p=0.31) occurred only in the OFLG with no adverse events in the ESTG. Definite stent thrombosis occurred in two OFLG patients (1.3%). In a real-world setting, the majority (88.9%) of patients were treated with BRS for off-label indications. Off-label use of BRS appears to be associated with an acceptable occurrence of outcomes considering the greater complexity of this patient group.

Did FDA Decisionmaking Affect Anti-Psychotic Drug Prescribing in Children?: A Time-Trend Analysis.

BackgroundFollowing Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval, many drugs are prescribed for non-FDA-approved (“off-label”) uses. If substantial evidence supports the efficacy and safety of off-label indications, manufacturers can pursue formal FDA approval through supplemental new drug applications (sNDAs). We evaluated the effect of FDA determinations on pediatric sNDAs for antipsychotic drugs on prescribing of these products in children.MethodsRetrospective, segmented time-series analysis using new prescription claims during 2003–2012 for three atypical antipsychotics (olanzapine, quetiapine, ziprasidone). FDA approved the sNDAs for pediatric use of olanzapine and quetiapine in December 2009, but did not approve the sNDA for pediatric use of ziprasidone.ResultsDuring the months before FDA approval of its pediatric sNDA, new prescriptions of olanzapine decreased for both children and adults. After FDA approval, the increase in prescribing trends was similar for both age groups (P = 0.47 for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder; P = 0.37 for other indications). Comparable decreases in use of quetiapine were observed between pediatrics and adults following FDA approval of its pediatric sNDA (P = 0.88; P = 0.63). Prescribing of ziprasidone decreased similarly for pediatric and adult patients after FDA non-approval of its pediatric sNDA (P = 0.61; P = 0.79).ConclusionsThe FDA’s sNDA determinations relating to use of antipsychotics in children did not result in changes in use that favored the approved sNDAs and disfavored the unapproved sNDA. Improved communication may help translate the agency’s expert judgments to clinical practice.

Non-Sexual Implications of Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors

Abstract Introduction Phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) hydrolyses cyclic guanylate monophosphate specifically to 5′ guanylate monophosphate, promoting corporeal vascular relaxation and penile erection in response to sexual stimulation. Oral PDE5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is) have afforded effective and well-tolerated treatment for erectile dysfunction. In addition, PDE5-Is have stimulated academic and clinical interest for their potential benefits in diverse non-sexual applications. Aim To highlight possible potential non-sexual implications of PDE5-Is. Methods A systematic review was conducted until January 2016 based on a search of all relevant articles in Medline Medical Subject Heading, Scopus, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases without language restriction. Key words used to assess outcome and estimates for the relevant associations were PDE5 inhibitors, sildenafil, tadalafil , vardenafil , and avanafil. Main Outcome Measures Different non-sexual implications for PDE5-Is. Results PDE5-Is demonstrated beneficial effects in different medical applications with possible widespread implications for cardiovascular, pulmonary, cutaneous, gastrointestinal, urogenital, cellular, musculoskeletal, neurologic, and reproductive disorders. However, most applications were carried out experimentally in preclinical studies of off-label indications. Conclusion PDE5-Is are a conceptually attractive therapeutic class of agents with pleiotropic effects. Exploring PDE5-Is for their possible implications seems to be valuable in different medical disorders. However, well-designed clinical trials are needed before these agents can be recommended for selected applications. Mostafa T. Non-Sexual Implications of Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors. Sex Med Rev 2017;5:170–199.

Risk of thromboembolism in patients with hereditary angioedema treated with plasma-derived C1-inhibitor

Plasma-derived C1-inhibitor (C1-INH) concentrates (pdC1-INH) have been used as safe and effective treatments for hereditary angioedema with C1-INH deficiency (C1-INH-HAE) for >30 years. Notwithstanding this, sporadic reports and a study into the high-dose therapy of neonates with C1-INH concentrate administered in an off-label indication raised concerns that this drug might increase the risk of thromboembolism. To investigate the incidence of thromboembolism and the background of the risk factors related to treatment with pdC1-INH. Our retrospective cohort study of 144 patients with C1-INH-HAE compared the incidence of thromboembolism and its risk factors in patients who received pdC1-INH with those who did not receive pdC1-INH as well as with those treated with danazol or with tranexamic acid. During the observation period (29 years), 104 of the 144 subjects received pdC1-INH. The average dose per treatment was 573.59 IU. None of the patients used an indwelling central venous catheter. Multiple risk factors for thromboembolism were identified in 93 of the 104 patients treated with pdC1-INH. The incidence rate of thromboembolism was 0.0019/100 person-years in patients treated with pdC1-INH, whereas it was 0.0211/100 person-years in the not-treated group. Our cohort study did not find any evidence for an increased risk of thromboembolism during treatment with pdC1-INH, despite the presence of multiple predisposing factors.

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Youth Exposed to Antipsychotics: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Antipsychotics are used increasingly in youth for nonpsychotic and off-label indications, but cardiometabolic adverse effects and (especially) type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) risk have raised additional concern. To assess T2DM risk associated with antipsychotic treatment in youth. Systematic literature search of PubMed and PsycINFO without language restrictions from database inception until May 4, 2015. Data analyses were performed in July 2015, and additional analyses were added in November 2015. Longitudinal studies reporting on T2DM incidence in youth 2 to 24 years old exposed to antipsychotics for at least 3 months. Two independent investigators extracted study-level data for a random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression of T2DM risk. The coprimary outcomes were study-defined T2DM, expressed as cumulative T2DM risk or as T2DM incidence rate per patient-years. Secondary outcomes included the comparison of the coprimary outcomes in antipsychotic-treated youth with psychiatric controls not receiving antipsychotics or with healthy controls. Thirteen studies were included in the meta-analysis, including 185,105 youth exposed to antipsychotics and 310,438 patient-years. The mean (SD) age of patients was 14.1 (2.1) years, and 59.5% were male. The mean (SD) follow-up was 1.7 (2.3) years. Among them, 7 studies included psychiatric controls (1,342,121 patients and 2,071,135 patient-years), and 8 studies included healthy controls (298,803 patients and 463,084 patient-years). Antipsychotic-exposed youth had a cumulative T2DM risk of 5.72 (95% CI, 3.45-9.48; P < .001) per 1000 patients. The incidence rate was 3.09 (95% CI, 2.35-3.82; P < .001) cases per 1000 patient-years. Compared with healthy controls, cumulative T2DM risk (odds ratio [OR], 2.58; 95% CI, 1.56-4.24; P < .0001) and incidence rate ratio (IRR) (IRR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.71-5.35; P < .0001) were significantly greater in antipsychotic-exposed youth. Similarly, compared with psychiatric controls, antipsychotic-exposed youth had significantly higher cumulative T2DM risk (OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.50-52.90; P < .0001) and IRR (IRR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.31-2.44; P < .0001). In multivariable meta-regression analyses of 10 studies, greater cumulative T2DM risk was associated with longer follow-up (P < .001), olanzapine prescription (P < .001), and male sex (P = .002) (r(2) = 1.00, P < .001). Greater T2DM incidence was associated with second-generation antipsychotic prescription (P ≤ .050) and less autism spectrum disorder diagnosis (P = .048) (r(2) = 0.21, P = .044). Although T2DM seems rare in antipsychotic-exposed youth, cumulative risk and exposure-adjusted incidences and IRRs were significantly higher than in healthy controls and psychiatric controls. Olanzapine treatment and antipsychotic exposure time were the main modifiable risk factors for T2DM development in antipsychotic-exposed youth. Antipsychotics should be used judiciously and for the shortest necessary duration, and their efficacy and safety should be monitored proactively.

Off-label use of the expensive orphan drug eculizumab in France 2009-2013 and the impact of literature: focus on the transplantation field.

The orphan drug eculizumab (Soliris ®) is one of the most expensive in the world and based on expenditures is classed among the highest in France, a scenario suggestive of off-label use. Given its pharmacological properties, it is likely to be used in organ transplantation. Our purposes were to describe the consumption trends of eculizumab for off-label indications overall and in the organ transplantation field and to assess the impact of publications on the latter use. We carried out a temporal ecological study within the French national hospitalization database (PMSI). First, the trend of eculizumab consumption (2009-2013) was compared to our estimate of the maximum on-label consumption (overall and for transplantation). Second, we evaluated the impact of the publications supporting the effectiveness of eculizumab in the transplantation field on temporal trends of eculizumab consumption. Eculizumab total consumption exceeded our estimate of the maximum on-label consumption since the end of 2011 and increased until the end of the study. The off-label consumption represented at least 50% of the total consumption. The off-label consumption in organ transplantation also increased since 2011. The amount of publications grew through the study period, but overall, the evidence level remained low. Statistically, publications were neither associated with the drug consumption for transplantation in the long term nor in the short term. Eculizumab started being notably used for off-label indications in France since the end of 2011, and this use increased until the end of the study. We found only low-level evidence concerning the off-label use of eculizumab in the transplantation field through the studied period.

Use of One-Way Intrabronchial Valves in Air Leak Management After Tube Thoracostomy Drainage

A persistent air leak represents significant clinical management problems, potentially affecting morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. In 2008, a unidirectional, intrabronchial valve received humanitarian device exemption for use in managing prolonged air leak after pulmonary resection. Since its introduction, numerous reports exist but no large series describe current utilization or outcomes. Our aim was to report current use of intrabronchial valves for air leaks and review outcome data associated with its utilization. A multicenter, retrospective review of intrabronchial valve utilization from January 2013 to August 2014 was performed at eight centers. Data regarding demographics, valve utilization, and outcomes were analyzed. We identified 112 patients undergoing evaluation for intrabronchial valve placement, with 67% (75 of 112) undergoing valve implantation. Nearly three quarters of patients underwent valve placement for off-label usage (53 of 75). A total of 195 valves were placed in 75 patients (mean 2.6 per patient; range, 1 to 8) with median time to air leak resolution of 16 days (range, 2 to 156). We present the largest, multicenter study of patients undergoing evaluation for intrabronchial valve use for air leak management. Our data suggest the majority of intrabronchial valve placements are occurring for off-label indications. Although the use of intrabronchial valves are a minimally invasive intervention for air leak management, the lack of rigorously designed studies demonstrating efficacy remains concerning. Prospective randomized controlled studies remain warranted.

The Judicious Use of Recombinant Factor VIIa.

Recombinant activated factor VIIa (rFVIIa) is a prohemostatic agent initially approved for use in hemophilia patients with inhibitors and recently for Glanzmann thrombasthenia. Despite its approval indications, rFVIIa has also been used for a diverse range of off-label indications to treat bleeding related to traumatic injury, major hemorrhage following surgery, intracranial hemorrhage, and for uncontrolled bleeding as a prothrombotic hemostatic agent. Despite its off-label use, the benefit of rFVIIa in most nonhemophilia settings remains uncertain as the majority of clinical trials have not consistently demonstrated beneficial effects as determined by reduced bleeding, decreased blood product utilization, or have not demonstrated a mortality benefit. As with any prohemostatic agent, the risk of thromboembolic events is increased when rFVIIa is used off-label. Pooled data from randomized nonhemophilia studies report an increased risk in the elderly for arterial thromboses, although most individual trials have been underpowered to determine adverse thrombotic events. The causes of thrombotic adverse events associated with off-label use of rFVIIa may be due to an increased risk of adverse events due to critical illness or due to higher doses of rFVIIa used in off-label trials. Without clearly supportive data, physicians should consider risk versus benefit and exercise restraint using rFVIIa in off-label settings. Further, evidence-based guidelines should be developed by professional organizations, and additional randomized controlled clinical trials are needed to further assess the efficacy and safety of off-label rFVIIa use.

Deux cas de toxidermies graves secondaires à un mésusage de la griséofulvine

Griseofulvin is an antifungal drug known to cause drug rash. However, it is widely prescribed outside its classic indications. Herein, we describe 2 cases in which griseofulvin was prescribed for off-label indications. Case No. 1. A 51-year-old woman was referred to the department of internal medicine for management of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS). The symptoms appeared 17 days after she had taken griseofulvin for inguinal intertrigo. Case No. 2. A 19-year-old female patient consulted for toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) affecting 30% of her body surface, with a positive Nikolsky sign and severe mucosal lesions. These symptoms appeared 9 days after she began taking griseofulvin, which had initially been prescribed for her husband for mycosis. Toxic epidermal necrolysis, a condition chiefly of drug-related origin, is a severe mucocutaneous syndrome characterized by massive keratinocytic apoptosis. Although there are few scientific publications referring to griseofulvin-induced drug eruption, they deserve to be mentioned since this drug is widely used for purposes other than the approved indications and can cause life-threatening reactions. We report two cases of toxic epidermal necrolysis related to the misuse of griseofulvin. It is important to bear in mind the precautions for use of oral antifungal drugs, which are strictly reserved for use against resistant or diffuse forms of mucocutaneous fungal infections.

Quetiapine safety in older adults: a systematic literature review

Quetiapine is a second-generation antipsychotic that is commonly prescribed for a range of approved and off-label indications in older adults. However, little is known about its safety in this population. The available evidence on quetiapine safety is based on studies on second-generation antipsychotics as a group, often in the general population and for approved indications. There are no systematic reviews on the safety of quetiapine in older adults, and therefore, there is a need for systematically assessing quetiapine safety in this group of patients to establish an appropriate safety profile for this vulnerable population. The aim of this paper was to review and describe adverse drug events associated with quetiapine use in older adults. A systematic literature search was performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Databases searched were CINAHL, PubMed, Medline, PsycInfo and the Cochrane Library. Sixty-nine papers met the inclusion criteria. The majority of the studies (n=36, 52%) were observational, and 11 (16%) were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Most of the reported indications (75%) were off-label. The most commonly reported adverse events were somnolence (25-39%), dizziness (15-27%), headache (10-23%), postural hypotension (6-18%) and weight gain (11-30%). From the included RCTs, comparing quetiapine with placebo, quetiapine resulted in significantly greater cognitive impairment, higher rates of falls and injury and increased mortality in patients with parkinsonism, but not in patients with dementia. Compared with risperidone and olanzapine, quetiapine had significantly lower risk of mortality, reduced rate of cerebrovascular events, increased rate of falls and injury and less metabolic disorders compared with olanzapine, but higher metabolic disorders compared with risperidone. This work provides full characterization of quetiapine safety in older people, which may help healthcare providers better anticipate, prevent and manage ADEs in this population.

Classification of psychotropic drugs: Problems, solutions, and more problems.

Byline: T. Sathyanarayana Rao, Chittaranjan. Andrade The current classification of drugs was introduced by the World Health Organization in 1976.[sup][1],[2] This classification is known as the ATC system, where A refers to the anatomical site of action (e.g., the central nervous system [CNS]), T refers to the therapeutic indication (e.g., the treatment of depression), and C refers to the chemical class of the drug (e.g., selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor [SSRI]). In the ATC classificatory system, the anatomical site of action could be the CNS (e.g., carbamazepine), the respiratory system (e.g., salbutamol), the cardiovascular system (e.g., digoxin), the gastrointestinal system (e.g., omeprazole), and so on. A problem here is that, for example, antimicrobials and antineoplastic drugs do not act on a specific anatomical system; however, they do act at a specific anatomical target, such as bacterial or neoplastic cells. Vitamins are other examples of drugs that are hard to classify with regard to an anatomical target. For Level 1 CNS drugs, Level 2 includes analgesics, anesthetics, antiepileptics, anxiolytics, antidepressants, antipsychotics, antidementia drugs, mood stabilizers, hypnotics, and others. A problem here is that drugs are classified according to the original indication for which they were studied and approved. However, many drugs have many indications. For example, SSRIs have demonstrated efficacy in depression, generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), premenstrual dysphoric disorder, migraine (prophylaxis), and other conditions. Nevertheless, SSRIs are still classified as antidepressants. Similarly, antipsychotics such as aripiprazole are effective in schizophrenia, in mania, as antidepressant augmentation treatment in major depressive disorder, as SSRI augmentation treatment in OCD, and in the treatment of delirium. Quetiapine and lurasidone are specifically effective as monotherapy for bipolar depression, and quetiapine is effective as monotherapy for generalized anxiety disorder. Some of these are not approved indications but are indications for off-label use. In like manner, antiepileptics such as valproate are effective in epilepsy, bipolar disorder, pain syndromes, migraine prophylaxis, aggression, anxiety, tardive movement disorders, and other labeled or off-label indications. For Level 1 CNS drugs and Level 2 antidepressants, Level 3 includes monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), SSRIs, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, noradrenergic and selective serotonergic antidepressants, and other drugs. Here, the method of classification is a little unsystematic, for example, whereas MAOI, SSRI, and SNRI are mechanisms, TCA describes a structure. Terms such as “newer” antidepressants tell us nothing about the drugs. Classifying Antipsychotic Drugs The problem is greater with the antipsychotic drugs. In the early decades, it was convenient to classify these drugs, based on structure, as phenothiazines, butyrophenones, diphenylbutylpiperidines, and other drugs. With subsequent drug development, many agents were synthesized that had no other member in their group. However, around the same time, a change in adverse effect profile spawned the atypical/typical distinction and usage, and afterward, the older/newer and first/second/third generation antipsychotic terminologies. A problem here is that some of the older antipsychotics did not produce much extrapyramidal adverse effects (EPS), if at all, and were, therefore, atypical in action; thioridazine is an example. In contrast, risperidone, ziprasidone, aripiprazole, blonanserin, and many other newer antipsychotics do produce considerable dose-dependent EPS and akathisia. …